Article: Mental illness mostly caused by life events not genetics, argue psychologists

Article: Mental illness mostly caused by life events not genetics, argue psychologists


To be specific, there are two root causes of mental illness: socipathism, which is the lack of consideration of the truth, and mental stress, which is the lack of released dopamine to handle the workload of considering that a brain is trying to do. And so the mental illness indicated by that above linked-to article is caused by the impact that life events have on a person's dopamine availability. With sufficient dopamine availability, a person will be able to rise above every challenging event.

That overcoming is a brain considering the meaning of every consideration which is a part of the event which a person encountered. And having greater dopamine availability won't change the amount of work which is to be done, but will make every workload weigh less and be handled with greater ease, and in less discomfort.

And genes are outputs of considering, which is the work of a brain that requires dopamine to do, and which suffers when a brain hasn't enough dopamine availability to perform it - and that suffering is then expressed in all the outputs of the processes which had to work without sufficient dopamine. And it is the false doctrines of reward-seeking sociopaths that has created the influences in society which are to blame for the continued existence and prevalence of mental health issues.



It's incredible that however many people (scientists, doctors, psychologists, etc...) have spent 100 years accomplishing absolutely nothing but an endless wild-goose chase of their own preferred determining.

A bunch of dopamine-plentiful people determined that it was better that any number of dopamine deficient people be tortured their whole lives, in pain, unhappiness and despair, conceding experience and opportunity, endlessly enduring agonizing stress and anxiety... all of it just because the dopamine-plentiful people found it preferential to their own comfort and position in society. Those people have been no different than slave owners whose entire fortunes were built on the backs of exploitation of others, and who would not give up their slaves, but would forcefully argue against the abolition of slavery - and they are still doing it.

Keeping dopamine deficiency states in society lets doctors and their ilk pretend that they're deserving of their reputation, their incomes, their self-determined "rewards"... but none of it is true. They are the most dishonourable of people, and their whole state in life has been built upon a lie, fraud, the undetected genocide of innocents and the most vulnerable. Everything that any doctor has ever judged a drug user of being all applies to doctors, themselves: They are in denial of reality, they harm others in pursuit of their goal, their ideology is selfish and only serving of them, they steal from people (their very lives), they cheat people (of their very mind, good health, and again lives)... they are acting out a sociopathic fantasy, and like bumbling idiots pretending that they are anything at all representing good.



This is what a doctor really is the custodian of:
Nixon official: real reason for the drug war was to criminalize black people and hippies

All modern institutional approach to drugs and health treatment is rooted in false and contrived drug propaganda, and is, itself, propaganda. And when governments, whose prerogative has been to use scare tactics to keep people away from looking at criminalized substances objectively, controls drug research licensing, and when pharmaceutical companies, who make their profit from inferior medications, fund the drug research that's available while also lobbying governments, and when a doctor’s greatest qualification for their job is precisely that they have no experience but are dopamine-rich due to being little-considering, what do you think that the expectable outcome from drug research and application will be?

The lie has been too sweet for doctors to pass up. They tell themselves that they deserve the things which that lie promised them, having jumped through the hoops of medical school, having not engaged in all the things they made harsh and harmful judgements against others for doing... they tell themselves that their placement in the lie is their "reward" - and they seek that reward more than they seek to do good for others. That reward, by their own labelling, is a release of dopamine within their brains. And so, in the end, they've been nothing but crack addicts, leeching off society and doing it harm for the purpose of trying to instil as much sense of that "reward" inside of themselves as they can. And their determinations in pursuit of this shut shuts down their considering, leading there to be much dopamine to fuel their depravity. And their depravity is that they have turned a falsehood into trillion-dollar industries, and that their whole livelihoods are built upon the liquidation of the lives of others, under pretence of helping them.

As Jesus said, no person can serve two masters: Either they will love one and hate the other, or vice versa. This is the same as what I said: For all things there is an ordering of considerations. And the final consideration will flip the polarity of all those that came before it and did not acknowledge it. A person who is reward-oriented is not truth-oriented, and a person who serves their own reward will hate the truth, because the truth says that their self-determined reward doesn't exist in the truth: There is no reward for the truth - the truth is, and there is no other. And Reason will flip the polarity of the entire world so that the truth may present in it once again.

Shrapnel

ASMR Response is Dopamine / Understanding Dopamine’s Experience in a Body

ASMR stands for Autonomous sensory meridian response, and is the producing of brain and body tingles and relaxing sensations though auditory “triggers”. There are many YouTube channels dedicated to delivering this type of experience.

Not every person is immediately responsive to ASMR, just as how a thing is considered by a person changes what influence, if any, it will bear within them.

But for those people for whom ASMR is effective, when immersing in sounds and sensations that have considered since your earliest days as a human, to hold relaxing, calming, safety-reassuring, and intimate meaning, the recognition of those associations invokes Reason’s principle, and it relaxes processes within a person’s brain, freeing up potentially very significant amounts of dopamine (more than typical prescription medications will provide a person with).



Also, just like ASMR’s responses can be experienced throughout the body, not just in the head, it is likewise with dopamine’s release. I previously mentioned that an orgasm is entirely the experience of a small surge in dopamine being release in part of a brain, and I’ve also said that when high doses of cocaine are taken, that the same experience occurs throughout a person’s whole body. All the synapses in a brain correspond to something within the human body, and when a synapse becomes flooded with dopamine, the area which corresponds to it will feel good. For lack of having experience, most people may think that the feeling of an orgasm is something unique to sexuality – but this is not the case. That same experience will occur from any and every area and part of the human body, if dopamine is filled in the synapses which correspond to that area of the body.

The feeling of goodness caused by dopamine in a part of a body is also a positive comment on that area of the body, letting it know that it is ready and strongly supported for robust and accurate functionality, and that it has the means to do whatever it needs to, and that experience and knowing is shared throughout a person’s mind and body.

While having dopamine flood synapses which correspond to genitals might (or not, depending on a person’s consideration) provoke a person’s sexual interest, the same is not true regarding having dopamine flood synapses which correspond to non-sexual areas of their body. There is nothing specifically arousal-producing about dopamine, but dopamine is physio-fuel for all a brain’s work, and the more of it that is available to a synapse, the stronger, healthier, better-functioning, alive and awake the physiological processes which listen to that synapse will be. Dopamine really is life, and fullness of life-giving to the brain and body, and as such should be regarded as a first recourse in addressing and preventing health situations – because dopamine is, by natural and good design, a primary consideration to all a brain and body’s work, and everything else exists downstream and is conditional to having enough of it available. To not embrace dopamine is to be in resentment and loathing of one’s own state of being human, and spiting of one’s own better health.



A person who seeks the ASMR experience is seeking the same thing as a person who uses dopaminergics, and is also mostly getting the same thing as a person who uses dopaminergics like crack cocaine, or methamphetamine.

The positive therapeutic effects of ASMR are the positive therapeutic effects of increasing dopamine availability within a brain, and therefore the positive therapeutic effect of using cocaine. Though I would not say that it is equally the therapeutic effect of all dopaminergics, which typically allow adrenaline to increase alongside dopamine, because that adrenaline increase is antagonistic towards stress states, and makes for a very different experience, more challenged experience than dopamine’s increase all on its own.

If a person receives a strong effect from ASMR, then they can understand what cocaine feels like, knowing that experience for themselves, and being a partaker in that experience. Of course, by using cocaine, that experience can be made much greater, penetrate more deeply, and be more consistent, and work even with people who don’t react greatly to ASMR. Understanding this, a person who is familiar with strong ASMR responses should easily realize how positive cocaine use is for stress states, and for positively and successfully addressing various negative health states.

Shrapnel

A Crash-Course in the Basics for Truth-Based Human Health Treatment

Dopamine, serotonin, adrenaline, opioids, cannabinoid receptors, GHB receptors... from the day a human is born, even for one that's in their mother's womb, their brain is an ongoing drug bath. And all human experience and productivity are achieved and expressed through the manipulation of drug levels in a person's brain.

i.

Some most basic understanding that is essential for a person to be capable of compassionately and successfully treating people of their stress / dopamine deficiency ailments is as follows:

a)

Dopamine is the means by which a brain does all the work that is considering, which is the work by which a brain and its person develops, learns, memorizes, recalls, decides, etc, and is work that the rest of the body's health is subject to. A person's potential and successes are subject to their brain's access to released and available dopamine:

- Work is only possible for a person and brain in an environment of having enough dopamine for it, and dopamine levels are what form a person's head-room for their work potential: More dopamine equates to a greater work potential, while less dopamine equates to less work potential.

- The weight of any body of work, and the effort required for it from a particular person, is entirely relative to the amount of released dopamine which a person has within themselves: It is possible for something which has a work weight value of +5 to a person of high dopamine availability, to have a work weight value of +500, or greater, to a person of low dopamine availability.

- Lower dopamine means that a brain isn't able to connect as much information at one time, and must address work in piecemeal, rather than in its entirety at once, or using larger concepts.

- Lower dopamine exposes a person's brain and body to greater affliction by keeping the brain in a continuous state of trying to catch up on work, without allowing it reach resolution of work so that it could implement the meaning of its resolutions in ways which create solid foundations for the mental and physical environment, and fortify them against detected vulnerabilities.

- Also, lower dopamine means that a brain isn't able to access larger concepts, such as the concept of a particular objective. Concepts are formed by connecting considerations, and that connecting is reliant on dopamine availability. The more dopamine that can be allocated, the greater number of considerations can be held in positive connection, and worked with simultaneously.

This means that a person's capability to overcome matters, such as emotional, mental, and physical, is relative to the released and available dopamine which they have in their brain. What seems a straight-forward and easily doable matter to a dopamine-plentiful person can appear like an insurmountable mountain to a person with low dopamine availability. And what is easy and straight-forward for a person with lots of dopamine availability is extremely more difficult, and less certain, even impossible, for a person with notably less dopamine availability.


A lot of people with high dopamine availability misjudge their worth by basing their assessment on outward appearance of their accomplishments and productivity relative to the general populace, without ever being aware that many of the people they judge as least motivated, productive, and ambitious, are exerting greater than 50x the effort each day, while accomplishing very little, compared to many of the people who are the greatest achievers by outward appearance. 

And those who are greater achievers are such only by way of having greater dopamine released within their brains, which many of them have precisely because they are less willing to consider fairly and truthfully, but instead make determinations which cater to their pre-existing prejudices, and which serve to establish 'reward' for themselves.

Having the dopamine for work makes it possible, easier, and desirable to accomplish more. Often, a person's sense of visible accomplishment causes them to feel more entitled to good things than those who accomplish little in the eyes of society. They do this because they sought to justify themselves by their determinations - but no one is justified by their determinations, and rather are justified or non-justified according to the consideration by which their works are done, in the sight of all truth.

As said by Jesus: "I tell you the truth, this poor widow has given more than all the others who are making contributions. For they gave a tiny part of their surplus, but she, poor as she is, has given everything she had to live on."

So it is often the case between those who accomplish visibly little, and those who achieve many things for themselves. And many who are doctors, scientists, entrepreneurs, etc, are in fact the most lazy, self-justifying, and entitled-feeling in all society.

b)

“Sober” is a context-dependent term, and ultimately there is no such thing as a sober human being, because all human experience and exertion is manifested through the constant manipulation of all the things which both legal and criminalized drugs equally manipulate within every human's brain. Human life is a drug-fuelled experience, and the only truly sober human is a dead human.

c)

"High" is a relative term: Say the typical scholastic achiever experiences a standard dopamine level of +40, while someone with a depression, or a psychosis, or anxiety has a vastly lower standard dopamine experience level, say +2, or as low as -40. If a person with a severe state of mental stress were to suddenly be in the brain and body of a scholastic achiever, it would feel to them exactly the same as if they were on a large dose of cocaine. But to each person, their standard dopamine experience level gives them their familiarity, from which they shape their expectations and beliefs surrounding what human life is.

That level is quantifiable by the amount of released dopamine a person has relative to the amount of work which their brain is trying to accomplish. The work which a brain is trying to accomplish is not visible by outward appearance, as a brain which is engaging more work than it has dopamine for will throttle, and become stuck. And the experience to the person will be as though they are stagnant, like they don't know what they think or feel about things, and like they can't reach what they sense within their own mind. And their outward appearance can be anything, often appearing as though non-motivated or lazy, when in fact their brain simply doesn't have the dopamine to press upward against the weight of the work that is sitting in its pipelines.

d)

Even though people from all dispositions use a term of stress at various times to describe their state, it is referring to completely distinct considerations, depending upon whom it is being spoken by. A person for whom a +10 dopamine experience level is their consistent normal, will call experiencing a temporary reduction to a +5 dopamine experience level as stress, while a person for whom a +40 dopamine experience level is normal, someone like a typical doctor, will call their exposure to mere +30 dopamine experience level "stressful", and start to expect all kinds of pampering and become unwilling to exert themselves further on anyone's behalf except for their own.

And then, quite often, that doctor will unflinchingly suggest, opine, or assert that someone who feels hopeless and and undeserving of help from people while they are stuck in dopamine experience level of -5, which is the only experience they know of, is an abuser of drugs, which, when they use, might only elevate their dopamine experience level to a mere +2. The real abuse of drugs in these instances is the doctor using their dopamine to impose a false, hypocritical, and harmful determination upon a person who is innocent of what they are accused of.

And, further, doctors will place all kinds of burdens upon the most destitute of people, for them to pursue as their treatment, which they would never consider subjecting themselves to, if the relative work weight were put forth before them. They would balk at it, aghast, as if the proposition were monstrously inhumane and completely irreverent of their person.

As an example, think of the eye-opener of simulated extreme labour pains that some women feel, being given to men. Likewise, doctors have no experience to reference that would make them capable assessors of what is appropriate for mental stress ailment sufferers to be treated with. People are only able to succeed scholastically, to possibly become doctors, due to having a level of dopamine released and available within their brains that makes them entirely virgin and non-relating to the experiences of those suffering mental stress ailments. A doctor has typically never come even close to conceiving what the reality is for people with dopamine deficiency - and their doctrines surrounding dopamine and mental stress treatment are direct reflections of their lack of comprehension and qualification.

The doctors of today, whose doctrine is self-aggrandizing and serves them far more than those they impose it upon, fulfill the role of the Pharisees in Jesus' day: "For they bind heavy burdens, which are grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers."

So, what constitutes as a "high" to a person with a low standard dopamine experience level is actually viewed as a state of stress to one with a high standard dopamine experience level. A scholastically-achieving person, without any mental stress, is very 'high' 24/7, relative to a person suffering a mental stress ailment. But to both of them, their experience will be the only one that they are familiar with, and this leads to people from all dispositions using the same terms while meaning entirely incompatible concepts, without them realizing it.

ii.

Whenever a doctor tells a person that drugs are not an answer, or not a good answer, it is a tell-tale sign that that doctor is the typical institutional fact-regurgitating hack, and has no truthful connectivity in their brain between the considerations which their perceived facts bear upon one another.

Even when counselling is an answer, even when taking a walk is an answer, even when taking a few days of rest is an answer, drugs are still an inalienable part of all those answers, due to the impacts those things have on the drug levels in the person's brain: Directly or indirectly, drugs are a part of the answer.

The human brain is a massive drug bath, and a human will not get from state A to state B apart from engaging a manipulation of the drugs swilling in their brain. And while it can be laborious, long-term, and possibly futile to get that manipulation through available indirect avenues, the same difference can be fulfilled in moments, or in a relatively short period of time, by directly engaging the brain’s drug adjustment requirements.

Drugs are never an answer all on their own, as they supply a brain with its needed considerations to do its work, but they are always a part of the answer, perhaps even the only part that is missing, as they serve to enable and facilitate movement towards the considerations that mean a person’s complete healing – which is movement that is largely unavailable and non-manageable for a person apart from extraneous drug use, as is made evident by the fact that mental stress ailments actually still exist in society after over 100 years of their scientific study.

If doctors can convince people that drugs are not the answer, or not a good answer, then they set themselves up as benefactors to profit off of people’s perpetual illnesses, because drugs are always going to be a primary component to every human health answer. And the people who are convinced that drugs are not an answer are going to perpetually require assistance so long as they avoid the root causes of their issue.

If a person doesn't like having cracked lips, a dry throat, a head-ache, or discomfort permeating their entire body due to dehydration, their options are to either drink water to prevent and resolve those unfavourable conditions, or otherwise endure the outcomes of being insufficiently hydrated. Like-wise, if a person doesn't like having depression, anxiety, psychosis, schizophrenia, bi-polarity, and doesn't like being vulnerable to PTSD, alzheimer's, parkinson's, and a host of other dopamine deficiency-emergent ailments... and also if they also don't like having their potential in life bottle-necked, and them never reaching the level of accomplishment which they see and know is possible, then they can either take control of, and learn to become responsible for their brain and body's natural dynamic dopamine requirements, or otherwise endure the outcomes of not having sufficiently accepted, or tended to their body's fundamental dopamine needs.

A person does not enter into those non-favourable states, apart from having less than optimally tended to their dopamine and consideration needs.

iii.

As I have said, those who call themselves doctors and scientists have done all things wrong. Scientists mock homeopathy and other “new-age” approaches as being fantasy, and call them harmful by way of causing a person to not seek more appropriate health treatment - but doctors and scientists espouse and perform all the exact same air-headedness when they tell and attempt to convince people that drugs are not an answer, or not the answer, or not a good answer. And when scientists and doctors do so, they commit the far greater offence, because, in an act of mental abuse, and in arrogance, they impose their harmful and ignorant determinations upon others, rather than simply exercising domain over their own body by making those choices for themselves.

The only reason a doctor is even in the position to be able to try to convince another person to not view drugs as a solution (though they assuredly have always been) is because the doctor already has enough of the same drugs released available in their brain to keep them out of the afflicted states of the people they might say such things to. So, anyone telling another human that drugs are not an answer is firstly telling that person an ignorant and harmful falsehood, but is also being an egregious hypocrite, as much as there ever was.

No human ever resolved a health issue apart from the engagement drugs, because the physical human body is drug-based, and a continual orgy of drugs for as long as it remains alive - and its life is dependent upon it.

iv.

By the way, considering is movement, and anything which engages consideration is provoking movement, and changing the form of a state – and the difference between any two states is a defined set of considerations. And the state of consideration in a person is the state of their brain-wiring, which directs health or sickness, which delivers capacity to overcome or vulnerability. When a person receives the necessary consideration to improve their state via something that may be classified as homeopathy, or new-age, which they would not have otherwise engaged, then that homeopathy or new-ageness thing would have indeed served as cure. The extent to which this can be productive has never been known by institutional medicine, but everything unfurls into consideration, and there are no limits to what can be done via considering.

But the ability for a human brain to consider exists in an environment of it having ample dopamine availability.

Shrapnel

Licensed Doctors and Medications are Entirely Without Relevance to Genuine Treatment of Mental Stress Ailments

i.

The justification for many common medications rests on a trial-based framed-conclusion of "Medication X is believed to... [a listing positive objectives] ". Below I give the context for what the "is believed to" is based on, when it describes a medication.


The designs of prescribed medications for mental stress ailments are such that they locks in a person's ailment, whatever it may be, for as long as possible, while the doctor profits from seeing the patient each time they need a prescription refill, and the drug manufacturer profits from having their drugs purchased. The helpfulness of prescription medications for mental stress ailments rides the very line between potentially beneficial to some, and definitively non-helpful to all. And when a pharmaceutical company develops and markets a new medication, their barometer for a successful medication is that the medication can be, if trial results are considered in a selective, very framed manner, potentially, by surface appearance, more positive than negative for a sizeable number of people. That's not to say that it will be positive for anybody, but that it passes the most meager qualification to be technically definable as not completely negative, and hypothetically better than nothing.

If the array of medications prescribed for treatment of mental stress conditions were any less effective, they would be indisputably harmful for all who take them. The device of restraint in these medications, which makes them of extremely marginal use, when they are useful at all, is their aversion to increasing a person's dopamine availability to any meaningful measurement, if at all. And doctors tell themselves all kinds of crackpot ideas of why they would not want to allow dopamine to be increased, but the truth is that a person only has a mental stress condition because they lack the released dopamine to handle work that their brain is trying to accomplish. And so, if a doctor is not willing to address mental stress ailments like depression, anxiety, psychosis, schizophrenia, PTSD, etc, then they should say that outright, and not waste and liquidate people's lives with phony medications while pretending to be willing to address the issue, when everything they do is to avoid addressing the root cause of these issues. Then, a person can know that they'll have to go elsewhere, if they want accurate and honest treatment for their mental stress condition.


ii.

To characterize the usefulness of various medications being used to treat mental stress issues, if there were a line of usefulness neutrality, and to the right of the line were increments going from a beneficialness of +1 up to a beneficialness of +50, and to the left of the line, increments going from beneficialness of -1 to -50, then the average performance of contemporary prescription medications for metal stress would be characterized as a neutral. And again, this is by design. Pharmaceutical companies are not under a legal obligation to cure anybody, and for the sake of capitalism, they are not seeking to cure anybody. Their immense financial profits come from perpetually treating people, and having people to treat, and not from having cured people. But they, and doctors, should be upfront when people come to them for help, and tell people that they are only willing to provide what is lucrative for them, and if what they provide marginally helps the person, then that can be viewed as a bonus for the person who needs the help.

If Methamphetamine were represented in this manner, used in the best manner, it could maybe achieve a +15 in usefulness for some people, and maybe only a +5 for others.

If cocaine were depicted, used in the right manner, then cocaine can deliver a full +50 performance for the average person.


Also, doctors beliefs are very commonly filled with crackpot presumptions about how a medication is effective:
- Some of them actually believe that when a person's tolerance levels out any experience of a medication is where the medication becomes effective.
- Many think that a person showing interest in the positive effect of a medication is a warning sign that they should not be receiving any more of the beneficial medication, as if the sign of improvement over a state of suffering is to not recognize, acknowledge, or value the improvement. And a lot of people who require dopamine-increasing medications know this, and taper their expressions accordingly (just like how pharmaceutical companies taper the effectiveness of their medications so that they deliver the least-possible performance while still being marketable) - the arrogant stupidity of doctors makes dishonesty with them a necessary policy for many people, and this doesn't help things in the long run.

And there are lots of other examples of backwards thinking in professional doctor views, where they seem to be entertaining a mystical enigma of 'the cure is not the cure', 'the ailment is the answer', 'to rationalize the ailment is to be treated'.


ii.

Generally, a doctor is going to be the last person who can be trusted for informed and objective input when it comes to mental stress treatment, drug use, proper medicine application... their working information is purely ignorant fiction, not really any more relevant than medieval superstition: It's just a modern dogma. The information by which doctors are educated is heavily contrived and artificial, and is merely convention, a conduct to follow, a line of thinking to stick to, but is wholly different than the truth of positive and successful health treatment. Doctors also have no real-world experience to draw from to form opinions on the medications which they so confidently give opinions regarding. Their scholastic success was due entirely to them having a level of dopamine availability within their own brains that it leaves them comprehensively unaware of just how unaware they are when it comes to dopamine deficiency ailments.

If a person's improvement isn't obvious to them, they should seek something better, because all degrees of better exist, and have existed longer than institutional medicine's diversions and harmful myths. And if a person doesn't feel the difference a medication makes very clearly, then it isn't doing anything, and anything a person suspects it may be doing is mostly placebo (which is itself dopamine increase), and less than real. And when a person doesn't properly address a mental stress condition within themselves, they are setting their brain and body up for further issues in life, and well as concessions in their experiences, and successes. Whether aware of it or not, a doctor's role when it comes to mental stress ailments is only as a lobbyist for companies who profit off the liquidation of innocent people's lives.

Shrapnel

There is No Such Thing as Too Much Dopamine as an Ailment

i.

Serving as an example of another perfect inaccuracy in medical attribution, there exist recommendations of lowering dopamine to deal with certain behavioural issues, such as impulsive behaviour, including addiction - neither of which are caused by having too much dopamine, but by the connectivity of a brain having considered in a manner, or been collapsed into a manner, which guides behaviour down such avenues. The high dopamine is caused by the low consideration - and not the impulsiveness (which is a product of low consideration) caused by high dopamine.

Diverting attention from the actual root causes of those behaviours, which is the consideration that guides them, to dopamine, has deadly repercussions for millions of people around the world, and creates an atmosphere of ignorance that prevents truthful physiological understanding arising so that and real and positive resolutions can be had.

ii.

Considering is the work of a brain that requires dopamine, and which forms the connections in a brain that guide a person's behaviour - and well-considered connectivity is what normalizes a brain.

A person who has reduced normalization in their brain by making determinations can be vulnerable to impulsive tendencies, and may also have a surplus of dopamine availability from reducing the amount of work their brain is doing. The issue there isn't too much dopamine, but a lack of connection-forming consideration to make use of the dopamine that's available - and this state is called being a sociopath / psychopath.

When a person has impulsive tendencies (which can occur where there is dopamine deficiency as well), the sickness is not the dopamine that is available, but the manner in which the person has considered their mind. Dopamine doesn't make a person impulsive anyway - it is what gives a person all their control over their mind, and their potential for the mental work that is considering. And what they consider will develop the pathway that will guide their behaviours.

It is not justified, or appropriate to blame dopamine availability for particular people's behaviour, and then restrict everyone's access to dopamine so that hundreds of millions of mental stress sufferers are tortured and exploited, just so that sociopaths and psychopaths do not need to admit to and confront their personal flaws and selfishness.

As it is, the people with the problems inside of themselves are the ones designating institutional ailments and treatments. They're saying that any number of innocent people need to suffer and be denied their deserved cure, so that they can continue being well-comforted while playing out a facade.

In an act of ultimate irresponsibility, they are imposing the penalty of their own guilt onto people who have done nothing wrong. And they profit heavily as the main benefactors from the torture it causes those people, both financially, and in ill-gained reputations within society as carers of people - whose problems they are the cause of, as well as obstructions to the needed cure, as if profiteering off the suffering of others is the sociopath's reward for ensuring that the suffering persists.

Now that I have elucidated the matter and corrected the attribution of fault in an impulsive person from dopamine to a lack of sound consideration, there is no longer justification for withholding the proper treatment from those who need it. Sociopaths need to learn to consider, and people with mental stress need powerful dopamine increases.

iii.

If a person has impulsive tendencies, then it isn't directly because of dopamine in any way. Though if a person has allowed pathways to consider which cause impulsiveness, having dopamine available will have a role in helping enable those pathways to be engaged. But having dopamine available is also what will enable it to be corrected by considering - a person cannot make one change in their brain, for good or bad, apart from having available dopamine.

Addressing an issue by clamping down dopamine is only masking the problem, and is not addressing it at its root. And thinking of dopamine reduction as a tool to avoid the problem has very harmful, including deadly consequences for millions of people who require increased dopamine to be healthy and in control of their lives.

Decreasing dopamine is not a solution to anything, and is running away from personal responsibility. And it is only even conjectured to be a solution because those who suggest it are only personally familiar with having a consistent high level of dopamine, and with no alternate experience to contrast their own with, they are left egregiously unfamiliar with dopamine's actual effect and importance - and this makes the things that they propose and impose on other people based in ignorance and hypocrisy.

A person who is familiar with dopamine is not going to choose to lower it to address any specific problem, because lowering it will reduce the capability and quality of a great many things. Lowering dopamine only stands a chance to reduce impulsive behaviour by reducing work potential of a brain enough so that there's no extra capability to engage considerations further than basic awareness. Awareness itself will be decreased, as will positive experience of senses, critical thinking capability, creative expression, visual depth perception, aural articulation, energy, and more.

Lowering dopamine lowers a person's capability to experience, perceive, and engage life, and lowering dopamine to address a particular behavioural problem would be like a person responding to having a messy home by having their sight, smell, and touch disabled so that they don't encounter their messy home's unpleasantness, rather that tending to the mess by cleaning it up.

Lowering dopamine is avoiding a problem, rather than dealing with it, and it is a selfish approach because it also encourages the continued victimization of many people who are being denied the dopamine they fundamentally require to be healthy, and to experience and enjoy life.

Shrapnel

Regarding Cocaine's Applicability for Treating Migraines (2nd Addendum)

Related posts:
1. Just a Tip (Regarding news of genetic mutations being responsible for such or such a condition)
2. Adendum - Migraines are Dopamine Deficiency - and also: The Importance of Tact in Dopaminergic Application - and also: The Importance of Considering the Truth



i.

Self-Medication of Migraine Headaches with Freebase Cocaine

Excerpt:

He first tried smoking freebase cocaine at age 27 at
the urging of a friend who suggested that it might
help a headache he had at the time. Indeed, he
noticed immediate and complete relief lasting between
five and fifteen minutes, after which the euphoric
peak subsided and his headache returned. He found
that he could sustain relief with each additional “hit
off the pipe” for another five to fifteen minutes, after
which the headache returned again. Eventually, he
depleted the supply of cocaine, “crashed,” and fell
asleep. When he awoke, the headache was gone. He
repeated this pattern for the next three headaches he
had. After his fourth episode of smoking cocaine, he
began to use cocaine even when he did not have a
headache. The cocaine never brought on a migraine
headache if he did not already have one at the beginning
of use.


Now, the part of most value from the above quotation is " Indeed, he noticed immediate and complete relief". This is because migraines are an expression of dopamine deficiency, and their perfect solution is increasing dopamine availability, while restraining adrenaline - which is the effect of cocaine. So, like I said elsewhere, there is no room for a greater perfection in cure than the state of +1 being applied to a state of -1, to address and treat the ailing state of -1.

The effect of cocaine is the 1:1 solution to all dopamine deficiency ailment. There is no more accurate solution, and none which addresses the root cause of dopamine deficiency, as cocaine does. Anything less than this is not addressing the root of the problem, and is avoiding the real issue.

This awareness of the real cure for people's ailments is the place to start when trying to treat them. And people cannot be properly treated so long as their one and only cure is avoided, as though it is a negative thing. And if a person's curing is a negative thing, why are people seeking treatments at all? If they don't want to be cured, well, that's already the situation - then their desire is fulfilled. If they do want to be cured, then they're going to have to accept the cure.


A secondary, but notable consideration from the above quotation include the duration of relief, which is mentioned as being 5 - 15 minutes. That is also the specific duration of crack cocaine's effect, depending on how much is smoked. Insufflated, or cocaine that is inhaled through the nose, lasts 40 - 50 minutes, and cocaine that is swallowed (such as in a capsule) lasts 50 - 60 minutes. Though oral cocaine can take up to an hour to kick in, and so isn't ideal for immediate relief. An exception is if cocaine is dissolved in liquid, and drunken - then it can take effect almost immediately.

Smoking crack every 5 - 15 minutes is a lot of upkeep, but inhaling a line of cocaine every 50 minutes or so, or talking a gulp of water every hour, is not significant upkeep, and is a miracle to resolve what has no other genuine cure.

There are things to be done with this knowledge to resolve the returning of migraines for good - and they also involve starting with the truth, which is the information that I've now provided above. The root cause of migraines, and their cure, is now openly known.



ii.

Also of significance in the above except is that there are non-substantiated and purpose-undefined ad hominem used to describe the anecdote. And that is a common liberty taken, and abused by doctors when engaging in subjects for which they hold trained prejudices. Examples include:

- "after which the euphoric peak subsided". What did euphoria have to do with the person's motivation for smoking the crack, or the measurement of its effective timeline? And did the person use the word euphoria to describe their alleviation from migraines? If having the availability of dopamine which a brain naturally requires simply to accomplish its work and not be suffering in terrible agony is considered to be the state of euphoria, when concerning mental stress sufferers, then every mental stress sufferer deserves euphoria, as a fundamental right. Was the doctor who wrote the above quote themselves in a state of euphoria, not suffering migraines, themselves?

The word's use appears to be arbitrary and without merit, connecting to no other provided consideration, and so giving no possible positive contribution to the description, though offering potential negative interpretation by feeding pre-existing prejudice in readers. The word's use is therefore not an objective use, but a biased and slanted expression, denoting that the writer is expressing themselves through socipathic brain-wiring.

- and also "Eventually, he depleted the supply of cocaine, “crashed,” and fell asleep". How was crashing measured, and how is it defined here beyond patronizing quotation marks which evoke sentiment, rather than consideration? How does crashing differ from sleeping? This addition appears to be sentiment in lieu of consideration, which is a sociopathic conduct.


There is no objectivity apart from having consideration to illuminate the truth of a matter. But because of their egregious lack of consideration, doctors typically do not have an understanding of what objectivity is to be capable of being it. And to the typical doctor, objectivity is but a peer-approved mode of behaviour towards a particular thing - Objectivity™. And they can be predisposed to forming their arbitrary concept of what objectivity is, when it comes to discussing the matter of drugs which they did not prescribe themselves, out of a monkey see monkey do, or, sociopath see, sociopath do, type of mentality. Basically, they often just parrot each others' abject stupidity, and invest their sentiments into the determinations they pick up from one another.

Because they lack a substantiation of truth within their brain's consideration structure, the layering of identical agreeing voices upon one another to give a +1 to a shared determination, such as peer approval or a peer review, is like crack to a sociopath, because there is little else to offer validation to the sociopath's sense of worth.


The expressions that I've noted above matter, as they spread consideration among readers, and all consideration is contributing towards a movement. Mental stress ailment persists in society because of seemingly innocuous callousness. As I said before, "Essentially, a person who believes in dopamine as reward thinks that deactivating their brain after doing nothing truthful is a state of reward, while not understanding that all they actually accomplished is the bringing of some negative consideration-value into the world, which will exist as an offence to the truth until somebody else does the work to righten the perceptions which were influenced by it."



iii.

Now, elsewhere, you can read it said that migraines might be, or are caused by a hyper-sensitivity to dopamine. A sociopath lack connectivity between considerations, and this is what's behind scientists and doctors commonly using words without there being any connectivity between the considerations of the subjects involved - which is the definition of mindless.


A sensitivity to dopamine would imply that dopamine's effect is experienced more strongly. But none of the descriptions of a purported 'sensitivity to dopamine' reflect any of dopamine's effect or experience.

The effects of a migraine cannot be caused by sensitivity to dopamine, because dopamine's effect, when increased and amplified, is not any of the elements of migraines - and therefore the experiences of a migraine do not befit a description of sensitivity to dopamine. A sensitivity to dopamine would be like getting a cocaine high, or a stronger cocaine high - which a brain handles to a very, very large capacity, and which is a positive experience, and which actually alleviates all the things which are described in migraines. So whatever the reasoning behind such a misnomer, it's incorrect. And that fuck-up is typical when a scientist or doctor makes determinations based off of their blind and prejudice observation.

The antagonizations described actually correlate very accurately to how increasing adrenaline in an already-stressed brain experiences. And as I said in the previous post, "sufficiently increasing dopamine availability relative to other things will alleviate a migraine - but try to not also increase adrenaline and noradrenaline at the same time, because that would be counter-productive, and could exacerbate part of the migraine". Also, increasing dopamine via common prescription drugs incurs a significant increase in adrenaline / noradrenaline, and even cocaine can cause an increase in adrenaline / noradreanline. So, the connectivity between the considerations of the subject appears to lead to a well-reasoned conclusion, which is converse in very primary ways to a suggestion that migraines could be result of a sensitivity to dopamine. It gives account for many more considerations that the alternate, and as a consideration is a quantum of truth, it is the greater truth by default.


With scientists and doctors, just as with government, when a surface picture enables for a framing that caters to held prejudices, then all standard qualifications for assessing the truth of a matter are thrown out the window. And there are many more problems with the 'migraines / dopamine sensitivity' convention than what I've mentioned here, but responding to all parts of what is succinctly a pile of garbage is not my main mission, but rather to address the root cure for mental stress ailment.

Even when doctors use terms like "root cause", they don't mean it literally, but mean it only as a buzz-word, like Root Cause™. And they use this term as a buzz-word, despite them not having any experience or knowledge that would grant them any tangible understanding concerning actual root causes of the things they apply the term to.

What I mention in this blog discusses the actual, genuine root cause of ailments such as ADHD, depression, anxiety, psychosis, schizophrenia, PTSD, alzheimer's, parkinson's, bi-polar, and more.



Btw, you'll notice that the allotment of exacerbation of migraine symptoms due to dopamine, rather than adrenaline / noradrenaline increases (which commonly releases in response to dopamine) represents a perfect inaccuracy, much like the labelling of dopamine as reward rather than as physio-fuel. As I said, making determinations aligns a person's considerations against the truth. As I've long said, all conventional medicine is tailored to the perceptions of sociopaths.



iv.

Having identified the perfect cure for migraines is great, and let's a person know where to begin when addressing their own migraine, and it enables people who actually intend to cure migraines to start behaving positively towards that end. The place to start is with the knowledge of the cure. There is just one perfect cure, which is whatever delivers the perfect counterpart to what's causing the issue, and this is it.

If every component of a resolution of migraines in society forms a concept, which is an ordering of considerations that resolves into a ring of truth, and the greater concept of resolving migraines in society is comprised of these rings, which are each a concept yet also each an individual consideration within a greater concept, then a migraine's cure as being precisely dopamine presents the primary consideration, which all other secondary considerations will conform to, and are to serve. And with a migraine's cure now being resolved, then secondary considerations can begin to be worked to resolution. Each successive consideration in the greater subject of resolving migraines in society will be easier to resolve once the primary consideration is established.

However, sociopaths tend to obstruct primary considerations, using secondary and lesser considerations as excuses for why primary considerations cannot be allowed to be considered by those who they are to serve. This is the only reason why mental stress ailment persists within society.


Now that I have made clear that increasing dopamine availability is the cure, as in the actual and exact cure, for mental stress ailments, surely those who present themselves as those who treat people's afflictions will be eager to deliver and make it accessible to those suffering ailments caused by its lack. Surely, their primary consideration in treating people is the genuine curing of them, and not something else - like ideology, reputation, profit, sentiment, control, ego, etc.

As I said in a previous post, by having the knowledge of dopamine, mental stress ailments become choices - both for the individual, and for society.

Shrapnel

Adendum - Migraines are Dopamine Deficiency - and also: The Importance of Tact in Dopaminergic Application - and also: The Importance of Considering the Truth

Related post: Just a Tip (Regarding news of genetic mutations being responsible for such or such a condition)


i.

Oh, and it should go without saying, but migraines are also a product of there being insufficient dopamine for a brain to handle work that is processing through it, and, yes, sufficiently increasing dopamine availability relative to other things will alleviate a migraine - but try to not also increase adrenaline and noradrenaline at the same time, because that would be counter-productive, and could exacerbate part of the migraine.

To do this is to treat the dopamine deficiency symptom at its root and source. To do anything other is to either be in denial of one's real problem, or to be self-spiting of one's own human being.

The pain of a migraine is a part of a brain's voice, and it is crying in anguish precisely for dopamine, which it essentially needs. Does a person ignore a baby that is screaming in pain if there is some anomaly afflicting it? Why would they act so inhumanely towards their very own brain, leaving it in a state of torture while it tries to do good work for the person? Such is an ultimate irresponsibleness and self-spitefulness. A person who cannot come to grips with the state of being a human is not worthy of being one, and is a danger to themselves, and a harmful influence within society.



ii.

But in all dopaminergic application, tact is all-mattering. Robin Williams, someone who endured various dopamine deficiency ailments, and took cocaine, and yet in the end wasn't helped by it, would be a text-book example of how not to pursue dopaminergism, if the knowledge to develop an understanding of these things to be put into a book had been pursued by any in the previous century, instead of engaging the quintessential sociopathic conduct of insisting sentiment-base determinations to people, to lying to people about the nature of dopamine and dopaminergics and building walls of propaganda and indoctrinating doctors using institutional falsehoods to turn them into agents of fallacy.

Robin Williams could have straight-forwardly been cured of his Parkinson's, anxiety, and depression using cocaine. He, too, was a victim of institutional misinformation on drugs, and of those who perpetuate that misinformation.

One of the most essential things to avoid in dopaminergic application is any sense that it is wrong to take these drugs, however a person feels they would like to take them. Regardless of whether a person harbours insecurities about increasing their dopamine, their brain still fundamentally depends on, and operates on dopamine. When a person is insecure about taking cocaine, or other dopaminergic, which is only from a century of false messaging by doctors, scientists, and government, that uncertainty and worry is a belief held by consideration, which is represented as synaptic connections within their brain.

Considerations have polarity, and receive their identity as relative to one another. And such a belief aligns certain considerations in a negative manner, and for as long as it evaluates as True towards the activity a person is engaging in, all signals relating to that activity will pass through that consideration, and receive an antagonistic influence, a quantum of negative consideration-value, which can infect the whole mind. And increasing adrenaline and noradrenaline will accelerate the considering of those things that are worries, and progressively amplify the presence of negative consideration-value in the brain until a time when things settle down and they can be reconsidered into normalcy. This is where drug-induced anxiety and psychosis come from - there is nothing inherent in the drugs taken themselves that cause these things, but it is a contagion created by doctors, scientists, and government, out of their sociopathic inclinations to attempt to justify their own statuses by demeaning and harming those of others, who they deem as targets for their prejudice.



iii.

All anti-drug propaganda bears a negative consideration-value within society, and the accrued negative consideration-value in society because of the previous century of anti-drug propaganda is tremendous, and it has killed many people, and has destroyed many families.

Despite its awful influence in society, every human being's brain and body still fundamentally runs on the things people have been taught to be scared by - and much unfortunate drug behaviour is no different than a you girl who is abused by their parents, being told she's a worthless slut who won't amount to anything, growing up to become a promiscuous and alcoholic vagrant (though these individual activities, if done within their control and awareness, and by their own choosing, would not be wrong). Such a person is not a statement against the harms of the alcohol or drugs they may use, but delivers an indictment against those who delivered to her the hateful messaging which considered through her, shaping the neurological pathways that guide her behaviour.

It is the same with negative drug usage patterns in society - none of them were caused by drugs, themselves, but were created by scientists, doctors, and governments, who then profit from their existence, and use them as false-justification to further the messaging that created them in the first place.

In the end, the Truth itself will require there to be full justice for those who were unfairly subjected to and manipulated by anti-drug propaganda, and who received mistreatment at the hands of those those who peddled that propaganda.



iv.

Also, ironically, when anti-drug propaganda is being administered to a society, there is a growth in sociopathism within that society, and a reduction in intelligence within that society, and the harms put into children and teenagers are those very ones which anti-drug propaganda would have them think come from drugs: Considering is the mechanism behind evolution, and a brain develops its connections through the course of considering. Those connections themselves represent the considerations of a person's mind, and greater Truth is manifest the more considerations are accounted for within an environment - and considerations which resolve into one form concepts. A determination is like a road-block that prevents considering from occurring - and the more determinations held in a mind, the less presence of truth there is in that mind, and the more selfish and sociopathic it is likely to be.

Anti-drug propaganda is not based in truth, but in sentiment-based determinations, disseminated and practised by truth-lacking sociopaths - and its influence is killing of the mind of society, and creating of all kinds of diseases. Conversely, taking many of the drugs anti-drug propaganda frightens people away from commonly greatly improves a healthy development of mind, and fortifies both physical and mental health.

So when anti-drug propaganda told people "this is your brain on drugs", that imagery and message was, in truth, what was being done to the brain of every person who believed that message. While the drugs they were being warned against did and do the opposite - they provide a person with the physio-fuel that makes them healthier, smarter, and more capable for good (though to use it is a person's choice). As I've said, a determination is a falsehood by nature, which reduces consideration (a consideration being a quantum of truth, and a quantum of mind), and which aligns a person's considerations antithetically to the truth.

Doctors and scientist and governments have brain-washed people into being scared of the very thing that cures them - and so they are made to suffer all kinds of artificially-created ailments. But in the end, just as in the beginning, the human brain effectively runs on the effect of cocaine, which is actually literally good by nature. And if a person is encountering an issue within themselves, particularly within their mind, the effect of cocaine would be a reliably good place to start addressing it, as a first recourse. It is good, normal, and healthy for a person to use drugs which they recognize by their own judgement as contributing positively inside of themselves - and no one on the outside is capable of casting a judgement over that.

The Truth is real, and cannot be determined, but can only come to be known by being considered.


Continued in this post: Regarding Cocaine's Applicability for Treating Migraines (2nd Addendum)

Shrapnel

Just a Tip (Regarding news of genetic mutations being responsible for such or such a condition)

You can view this type of news all over the place, and regarding a host of different ailments and conditions:

Genetic mutation 'is responsible for BOTH migraines and IBS'

Genes are an output of considering, and the work that is considering requires dopamine. If something is going wrong in the development and maintenance of a gene, then there was likely an insufficient availability of dopamine to provide the pathways that were relevant to that gene's creation with enough dopamine.

Further, conditions such as anxiety, depression, psychosis, etc, in all their details, are ultimately merely symptoms and expressions of dopamine deficiency.

Modern medicine has taken a falsehood regarding dopamine, that of it being "reward", rather than physio-fuel, and turned it into trillion-dollar industries, as well as a container for their prejudice. Those complicit in this are mass murderers, and those administering this charade and farce, such as doctors, who uphold the forced obsolescence of people, are no different than nazi guards who held posts at death camps during WW2, who, too, believed they were enforcing a righteous paradigm, and were just doing their job and what they were trained for.

When looking at events in history like the Crusades, people often use that as a notation of how many religion has killed. Well, by the same measure, looking at those who have been killed by decades upon decades of corroborated institutional medical science, through defamation of dopamine, it is true to say that those killed by their science in the previous century number in the hundreds of millions, and those victimized by science number in the billions - and therefore more people have been killed in the name of science than in that of any other dogma.

Humans have not yet achieved a more efficient tool of death, suffering, and inequality than the mischaracterizing of dopamine and dopaminergics. And those delivering these false representations are the most proficient of mass murderers in history.



This post is part of a series:

1. Just a Tip (Regarding news of genetic mutations being responsible for such or such a condition)
2.  Adendum - Migraines are Dopamine Deficiency - and also: The Importance of Tact in Dopaminergic Application - and also: The Importance of Considering the Truth
3. Regarding Cocaine's Applicability for Treating Migraines (2nd Addendum)

Shrapnel

Article: What Causes Autism?

Article: What Causes Autism?


Well, just as medications which alleviate symptoms of depression, anxiety, psychosis, tend to increase dopamine, so also do medications which alleviate symptoms of autism tend to increase dopamine. This all makes sense, since increasing available dopamine increases healthy development in a brain, while lack of dopamine leads to all types of mental stress ailments, general health problems, and impoverished brain development. So I would venture that autism, a development issue, is caused by a pregnant woman experiencing dopamine deficiency during their pregnancy, at least in some regions of their brain.

If so, then addressing the problem at its root would be to increase dopamine during pregnancy, to avoid unwanted development issues.

Of course, having more dopamine leads to improved health and development in general, while lacking dopamine means a greater vulnerability to health issues in general, and impoverished development in specific:
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2016/01/articles-poverty-may-alter-wiring-of.html
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2015/12/articles-stress-could-increase-risk-of.html
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2015/09/managing-and-increasing-dopamine-can.html
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2015/12/am-eclectic-assortment-of-articles.html
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2015/12/a-few-more-for-eclectic-assortment-of.html


And use of cocaine during pregnancy is shown to improve fetus development:
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/24283537_Prenatal_cocaine_increases_dendritic_spine_density_in_cortical_and_subcortical_brain_regions_of_the_rat


Also, cocaine, whose effect is to increase dopamine's availability while inhibiting adrenaline's release, delivers literally the antithetical influence as schizophrenia on brain development, boosting growth in the region associated with learning and memory, and like all dopaminergics, including the "smart drug" modafinil, enhancing a brain's capabilities (which would be relevant to enhancing fetus development):
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17641875
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2016/01/articles-study-suggests-genetics-could.html


And the myth of crack babies, babies being born with issues do to their mother using crack during their pregnancy, has appropriately been debunked:
http://articles.philly.com/2013-07-22/news/40709969_1_hallam-hurt-so-called-crack-babies-funded-study
http://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Family/2013/0725/Crack-baby-development-issues-not-side-effect-of-drug-but-poverty
http://www.businessinsider.com/crack-baby-myth-debunked-2013-7
http://www.salon.com/2013/07/23/longterm_study_debunks_myth_of_the_crack_baby/


It may well be that the very best thing for a pregnant woman to do to prevent health issues for their child, while fortifying their child's development, is put aside time to relax and smoke crack, or to take cocaine, while in their pregnancy.


But medical research cannot be relied upon to inform a public concerning this, because all scientific research, and particularly drug and health research, is egregiously biased, contrived, and unreliable, with at least (I will clarify this in another post) 60% of researchers publishing biased, and therefore False information as conclusions. And when it comes to drug research, I think virtually all conclusions are slanted (and therefore directing away from the truth). I would even say that a medical researcher is, by default, in the position of being an unreliable witness, since they, their field, and their funding providers stand to benefit from falling short of delivering real solutions (and this is a recipe for disaster in Reward-oriented mindsets, who are also sociopathic by nature, and therefore predisposed to being untruthful):
http://www.nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248

Particularly when it comes to drug and health research:
http://www.bmj.com/content/349/bmj.g7015

Which requires government license to study, and governments are not that likely to approve research which they don't like the objectives of, particularly when there is a history of such research being shut down, to go alongside with a history of such research delivering fabricated, or conniving conclusions:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/jun/13/bad-science-cocaine-study
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2016/01/looking-at-instance-of-deliberately.html
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2014/08/response-to-cocaine-study-bearing.html


I would put forth that 90%+ of what is read as health research is not true at all, and is either wilfully directed, or conducted by people who are sociopathic, who cannot arrive at unbiased conclusions because they have corrupted the connectivity in their brain that gives a person their perception - with the inter-connectivity between all considerations substantiating what is being what manifests truth.


Related post: Cocaine Use During Pregnancy Can Prevent Autism

Shrapnel