Addendum to the Previous Post about Parkinson's Receptibility to Dopamine, and also Something of Psycheparous

Related post: Article: Asthma drugs may reduce Parkinson’s risk (yet another lap around the same track)


I've explained this before, and it deserves representation wherever talking about dopamine treatment for an ailment like Parkinson's, where the contemporary medical practitioner's presumption is that dopamine treatment of the ailment works at first, but eventually loses its effectiveness.



i.

With most all dopaminergics, when a person takes them, they're increasing both dopamine-availability, and adrenergic influence in their brain.

The more that dopamine is increased, the easier it is for a brain to connect information across synapses, to sync considering processes, and to process work to its conclusion and free up that pipeline space within a brain. However, as adrenergic influence is increased, the faster the brain tries to work, and the more dopamine is required to handle the increased workload of the brain. So, increasing adrenergic influence alongside dopamine is applying antithetical influences, and does a lot to undermine the goal of attending to states that are in need of an increase of dopamine, such as the dopamine deficiency ailment of Parkinson's.

When people taking dopaminergic drugs like meth get wired out, twitchy, and agitated, that's because of the adrenergic influence on the brain's processes over time outpacing the more temporary sought dopamine boost that those drugs give. The influence of the dopamine increase is immediate, and positive, but the influence on processes from the adrenergic increases is more inlaid, compiling over time, and lasting after the dopaminergic influence and benefit has worn off.

When taking dopaminergic Parkinson's medication, it initially helps because it is increasing dopamine, and that's always giving a positive work capacity boost to the brain, which immediately alleviates away as much of the top-layer negative impacts of the ailment as there is supplemented dopamine to address. But, at the same time, the brain is also being fed an increase in adrenergic influence, which will be feeding the source of the ailment all the while in the background.

So, over time, dopaminergics become less effective, not because dopamine stopped being what the brain needs, but because the adrenergic influence that was simultaneously being administered as a consequential component to the dopaminergic influence has contributed towards accelerating the ailment to the point that the dopamine aspect of the medication is no longer a significant influence against the ailment.

There aren't many dopaminergics that do much to inhibit adrenergic influence, but cocaine is one of them, and is what makes it such an effective treatment for mental stress ailments. I would say that if cocaine was used, rather than the various medicines that are currently used to treat Parkinson's, that there wouldn't be witnessed the same eventual ineffectiveness of the dopamine treatment as the ailment overcame its reach. And if used with understanding of Psycheparous to manage the movement of signals in a person's brain, then a full cure is in reach of anybody.

Keep in mind that what I've said would only apply to pure cocaine, as the things that street cocaine is cut with frequently add negative adrenergic influence of their own.



ii.

Conventional medicine is mired in an identity crisis, where it can't make up its mind whether it wishes to be good, or to be evil; whether it wants to cure people, or accomplish its ideology. When treating an ailment with part cure, part poison, then there isn't a full will present to cure that ailment, and the practitioner's interests are divided, and they end up failing to do good.



If asking a doctor: Do you want to cure this person, or not?

They might say: Yes, I want to cure that person.

And if it is then said to them: OK, so do what will cure that person.

Then their mind detaches itself from the context of the discussion, and they default into a programmed ideological determination of: We don't want to give people things that encourage non-medical substance use.

Which means that their honest answer to the question of 'Do you want to cure this person whose ailment is cause by lack of this specific thing, relative to the influence of these other things?' is: No, I do not want to cure that person - because the word 'cure' in that context is a stand-in which represents doing the very thing that is the person's cure. It's like a pointer, that references a container in which is held the considerations that fulfill the meaning of Cure for that particular person's situation.

Just as Jesus said 'you cannot serve mammon and God,' it is also true that a person cannot simultaneously serve ideology and still do what is good. An ideology is something that a person determines and sets up to replace the truth as their guide.



iii.

Just as considerations are polar, the signals that are considering through a person's brain present a workload for that brain. That workload carries a value to it, and dopamine-availability also presents a value of work potential. When there isn't enough dopamine to address presented workloads, it is possible for the workloads to do damage to that brain, as those signals are being pulled through the brain by Reason with force. Things can break, splintering one process into many that each need the same value of dopamine as the former one process did. Also, considering can collapse, and call fall into failure, including a failure that keeps considering over and over as a negative loop. And considerings that collapse into each other can form a black hole-like force, made by their compounding polarities all directing towards a point that draws in other consideration... and this is how granfalloons become created, as considerations are pulled out of the truthful context that gives them their meaning.

However, likewise, when a mind is filled positive truthful belief, the considering of that mind lifts it up with great strength into ever-greater truth, being the example of 'to whoever has, more will be given.' And many things will continually be resolved in that person, with them progressively filling up with light as they do so. Such considering represents the 'streams of living water' that Jesus spoke of, which he said become a 'spring of water welling up to eternal life.' As I've said, life is the movement created by considering, and considering is the movement created by considerations being considered by and flowing through other considerations.

Shrapnel

Article: Asthma drugs may reduce Parkinson’s risk (yet another lap around the same track)

Article: Asthma drugs may reduce Parkinson’s risk



i.

This isn't a mystery, and it shares the same explanation as a great multitude of other ailment-medication responses: Clenbuterol increases dopamine, and dopamine is the human brain's work fuel, and is what it uses to connect information across synapses. Any time dopamine is being increased, a brain's work capacity is being increased, and any time dopamine is reduced, a brain's capacity for work is reduced and stress is increased. Mental stress is merely a lack of dopamine availability within a brain relative to the amount of work a brain is trying to do, and is comparable to dehydration being a lack of water, and asphyxiation being a lack of oxygen.

Depression, anxiety, psychosis, ADHD, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, schizophrenia... they all emerge from the state of stress that is dopamine deficiency, and they can all be effectively treated, even cured, by increasing dopamine while inhibiting adrenergic influence. The interrupted fetus development that is autism is again a case of insufficient dopamine availability within a pregnant mother, and autistic child-births can also be prevented by ensuring dopamine levels are high enough relative to other things in a pregnant mother.

Relatedly, what is called the placebo effect is positive belief reducing the micro states of uncertainty and worrying (those things causing considering in a brain, which is the work of a brain for which dopamine is required), which reduces the work in a brain, which frees up dopamine availability for a brain, which consequently leads to improved health.

Most dopaminergics have an unfavourable adrenergic influence alongside their positive dopaminergic influence, and increasing adrenergic influence worsens stress states. However, cocaine is one dopaminergic which does inhibit adrenergic response, and is excellent at inhibiting adrenergic response while greatly increasing dopamine availability within a brain.

In fact, when applied with understanding, it is possible to flush a severe and long-existing psychosis from a person in just a mere couple of hours, or less, using pure cocaine.



ii.

And don't forget Schizophrenia:

Exhibit A) Study Suggests Genetics Could Be The Root Cause Of Schizophrenia

"The findings may help explain the longstanding mystery of why brains from people with schizophrenia tend to have a thinner cerebral cortex with fewer synapses than unaffected individuals do," said a press statement from the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, whose experts took part in the study.

This is the brain's outer layer, often referred to as grey matter, involved in learning and memory."


Exhibit B) Mice Fed with Cocaine Show Growth in Brain Areas Linked with Learning, Memory

Looks like we have a match!


It's also the same reason why Methylene Blue helps against Alzheimer's, why coffee does the same and can help a person to live longer, why Modafinil is a "smart drug", why teenagers who lack what fuels a person's working memory capabilities end up using dopaminergic drugs while simplifying life helps prevent future mental illness, why poverty has the effect on people that it does, and why a million other dopaminergics help against a million dopamine-deficiency ailments:

An Eclectic Assortment of Articles, Which All Receive Resolution by Understanding Dopamine

A Few More for: An Eclectic Assortment of Articles...

The Third Entry Into "An Eclectic Assortment of Articles, Which All Receive Resolution by Understanding Dopamine"


It's all one thing - same cause, same solution.



iii.

Dopamine is only "reward" to a sociopath, who, because of their low consideration, associates the increased dopamine availability they experience from doing the types of things which they have determined to indicate that they are good little dogs as being a confirmation of their good little dogginess. This understanding is an inversion of the truth. What's actually happening is the same thing as happens with placebo:

"positive belief reducing the micro states of uncertainty and worrying (those things causing considering in a brain, which is the work of a brain for which dopamine is required), which reduces the work in a brain, which frees up dopamine availability for a brain, which consequently leads to improved health, cognitive strength, and positive feeling."


To someone that isn't a sociopath, dopamine is not "reward," or something that comes in the end, but physio-fuel, and what is required to be there in the beginning for proper and intended functionality, and for proficient and healthy development. To human physiology, it is the god-molecule.


Conventional medicine is firstly about ideology and profit, and not truth. The truth is that an enormous host of illnesses, particularly mental illnesses, all only emerge and branch from mental stress, which itself is simply a lack of dopamine availability in a brain relative to the amount of work that brain is trying to accomplish.

And much research that is done concerning related topics is primarily about the researcher seeking to experience peer-approved "reward" for conforming to and supporting a dogmatic ideology.


To sum the situation up from one angle: Institutional and academic medical doctrine is fake. It is the 21st century's equivalent of practising the four humours, and would only be more so if the four humours was a patented practice that earned its patent-holders money every time it was practised.



iv.

because it strips them of all the determinations they've used as justification for


Why do today's scientists revel in historical stories such as Galileo facing off against an institution of dogmatic ideologues who had all the evidence they were willing to consider to prove that Earth is the centre of the universe, when today's scientists are the same as the people Galileo faced off against?

And this is a pattern that has occurred throughout history: An individual person considers beyond conventions because of the greater belief they have within themselves, and by their consideration discovers new marvels that they then make known to everybody.

But all those who move by determinations oppose the greater consideration presented, because what is presented strips those people of all the determinations they've made to justify themselves, invalidating their prejudiced judgments, their perceptions of their statuses, their reputations as knowledgeable authorities...

In time, however, the greater truth become reinforced as indisputable, and then those whose truth is their determinations begin to make determinations about everything surrounding the new thing and begin turn it into an ideology, an institution, and a dogma. Then, sociopaths from all over flock to that thing and conform to it, not because they understand and know it, but because the appearance of consensus is what they take as truth. And they reinforce that thing with all kinds of extraneous infrastructures, and wave that thing all around as their "proof" of many other things, including why they're smarter than the dogmatic ideologues of history who did the same thing as they are doing - because now they have the right determination to conform to and invest their sentiments into.

But the truth is not a determination.



Related post: Addendum to the Previous Post about Parkinson's Receptibility to Dopamine, And Also Something of Psycheparous

Shrapnel

Articles Concerning a Couple of Other Matters Which I've Already Given the Understanding For

i.

Article: Study finds psychopaths have below-average intelligence

I said this long ago, on this blog, that the industry hype about sociopaths and psychopaths having high intelligence was the opposite of the truth, and a product of those who are making such assessments being of sociopathic disposition, themselves - and that it's because they regard peer-praise and the ability to manipulate situations to their personal benefit so highly, that they consider those things to be the picture of intelligence, to them.

I also said that doctor, and scientist, are two of the foremost professions populated by sociopaths / psychopaths - people who have been raised with a discipline-type which taught them 'this determination is good' vs 'this determination is bad,' putting up many roadblocks to considering within their mind and brains, and resulting in them lots of surplus dopamine to make them very functional, self-confident, and scholastically successful, while ultimately being ineffective for much beyond sucking up to the popular themes of the day, and looking for ways they can fit themselves into granfalloons.

That type of disciplining also conditioned their personalities to perceive the experience of dopamine being freed up within their brains due to concluding the work that is considering (which is the work of a brain for which dopamine is required) as though it were "reward" for fulfilling various determinations, since it replenishes in availability each time they cause the desisting of considering. This disposition renders them very non-appreciative and of the truth concerning the states of malady that come about explicitly because of dopamine-deficiency, and it makes them non-empathetic to the great suffering that their doctrine of fiction is responsible for causing for other people. Their mistaken perception results in them feeling justified in exploiting the dopamine-deficiency-caused states of suffering of others for the sake of their own personal self-gratification, which they justify to themselves as "reward" for conformity to peer-approved ideology.



[Side discussion]

That type of disciplining also conditioned their personalities to perceive the experience of the dopamine that freed up within their brains upon their conforming to a peer-approved determination (which ended some considering, freeing up the dopamine being used for that considering) as though it were "reward" for obeying that peer-approved directive. Of course, the actual state of things is that that perception of their was only a symptom of their enormous stupidity, which itself was a product of their being taught 'this is good' vs 'this is bad,' which prevented their own considering of matters within their mind and brain - which would have developed the consideration structure that is smarts.

That's why there is so much drug-related research that concludes things which is not supported by any of the evidence looked at in the study: The writer A) can't understand any of what they're looking at, and so they default to assuming it means a determination about how the substance is negative for health, because they don't know how to consider, and B) conforming to the peer-approved granfalloon makes them feel good, because it avoids considering, freeing up dopamine that was allocated towards figuring something out when they first looked at the matter.

In effect, people who are "reward"-motivated are all junkies, only looking to acquire their next fix as soon as possible, by way of falsifying whatever they're working on. That's why medical science hasn't moved one inch on the matters of dopamine and mental health in a century, and why I produced both those matters' complete understanding, from start to finish, within one year. The professions of doctor and scientist are filled with junkies who are only there for the high of feeling as though they're conforming to the peer-approved granfalloon, and whose only guidance in what they do is the appearance of propriety and authority of their peers, and who work against people who literally need dopamine to be healthy, well, and productive, just so that those doctor and scientist junkies can get their dopamine fixes by conforming to their peers' opposition of those people's lives.

I tell you the truth: The memory of those who work out of "reward" and to prevent acceptance of the truth of human physiological health will be like that given for Nazi guards who stood outside concentration camps, feeling strong, proud, and justified for upholding the murderous and self-aggrandizing granfalloon of their day. And those who call dopamine "reward" will be like early-USA slave-owners, who rationalized their positions of manipulated circumstance in society by framing Africa-Americans as sub-humans and animals, whose greatest possible semblance of civility and contribution to society was under the ownership and whip of their white owners. Those slave-owners, too, used the very same rationalization as "reward" (their being white vs others being black) to justify to themselves their disposition and ability to self-benefit in society, at the expense of those on the under side of their determination - and at the expense of the truth, itself.

The conforming Nazi guard and slave-owners of yesterday are the same people who call themselves doctors and scientists today, serving their institutions' fictions of ideological and capitalistic preference. The same evil found another form, in doctors and scientists, but it is the same evil.



[Back to the main topic]

I said that a psychopath / sociopath is someone whose mind lacks considerations, which are developed through the act of considering, which is the work of a brain that requires dopamine to accomplish. And so, since sociopaths / psychopaths lack the willingness to do the work that requires dopamine to complete, they end up having a lot of surplus dopamine, which is what produces all cognitive clarity and work-potential for a brain, and so those who have lots of it due to not using it for the work of considering have lots to apply to the few considerations that they do have, and make them very proficient in utilizing the few and basic considerations that they do possess.

In other words, due to their large dopamine availabilities (due to being non-considering, but conforming to determinations), sociopaths are highly functional in a society that has been tailored by sociopaths to benefit sociopaths.

Related post: Things to Consider About Sociopathism




ii.

Article: Could signals from the heart trigger fearful reactions based on racist stereotypes?

Thought originates in a person's heart, as belief, which is a 'This Is' command, which then travels as a signal to a person's brain, and filters through all their considerations, becoming articulated in the process. If able, a person's considerations will reason with the belief as it considers through them. And after having being fully considered, there is output a new meaning, which takes a manifest form, such as an action, the development of a new consideration, etc, and so, by way of Reason, what was considered applies back into the mind which considered it.

Related post: Articles: Study Suggests Genetics Could Be The Root Cause Of Schizophrenia (*big yawn*, I already resolved this) (part iv.)


Regarding this: "Thought originates in a person's heart, as belief, which is a 'This Is' command, which then travels to a person's brain, and filters through all their considerations, becoming articulated in the process."

... this is why Jesus said "The good man brings good things out of the good treasure of his heart, and the evil man brings evil things out of the evil treasure of his heart. For out of the overflow of the heart, the mouth speaks."

And Also: "But the things that come out of a person's mouth come from the heart, and these defile them. For out of the heart come evil thoughts--murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander. These are what defile a person; but eating with unwashed hands does not defile them."

And another excerpt, from Mark, says: "'Are you so dull?' he asked. 'Don't you see that nothing that enters a person from the outside can defile them? For it doesn't go into their heart but into their stomach, and then out of the body.' (In saying this, Jesus declared all foods clean.)

'What comes out of a person is what defiles them. For it is from within, out of a person's heart, that evil thoughts come--sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander, arrogance and folly. All these evils come from inside and defile a person.'"

That same also declares all drugs to be clean.



What does it look like, when a person believes in the truth, and that belief invokes Reason and causes considering? It follows the pattern that electricity makes for itself, as it moves through a medium - like can be seen at 1:15 of this video:

Or, like can be seen in the synaptic connections in a person's brain, which are the manifestation of belief.


And this manifestation that starts with belief, and, because of Reason, goes on to produce the truth of all things, is also what Jesus referred to when saying, "The kingdom of heaven is like a mustard seed, which a man took and planted in his field. Though it is the smallest of all seeds, yet when it grows, it is the largest of garden plants and becomes a tree, so that the birds come and perch in its branches."

And also: "The kingdom of heaven is like yeast that a woman took and mixed into about sixty pounds of flour until it worked all through the dough."

Just as yeast causes dough to rise, so do the considerations that emanate from belief cause a mind to rise up into the greater perception, and joining of the truth.


No study or science was required in producing the full understanding of these matters, but only considering them from the belief that is good, and with a willingness for truth, rather than for self-benefit and conformity to peer-approval for the sake of experiencing "reward."

And conforming to, and making determinations for the sake of experiencing "reward" is only different than a person stealing money (rather than truth) to buy crack cocaine in that the person stealing money to buy a dopaminergic drug to experience a dopamine increase may well have a legitimate dopamine deficiency that those stealing truth for their fix have prevented from being addressed through other means.




iii.

All movement is produced by considering, and a person can only act, or move from one state to another by Reason. To be able to consider, to create movement, a person must first have belief, which creates context between considerations and is a 'This Is' declaration, upon which Reason acts. When a person is unwilling to first have belief, their only other option to progress is by creating false reasons by making determinations, which progressively divide and reduce the connectivity of considerations, which forms their mind and being. A person who does not believe, but who makes determinations to benefit themselves, is continually exhausting their spiritual equity. And the state of no longer having any consideration to be move through is the "outer darkness" that Jesus spoke about. The absence of movement of considerations by being considered through other consideration, is death.

And this is also why this declaration from Jesus is truthful: "And this is eternal life, that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent."

And also: "I am the resurrection and the life. The one who believes in me will live even if he dies, and the one who lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this?"


The only way to know something is to have fully considered it, to have its full being considering through oneself, so that it is known - because everything is its considerations.

To have considered something, a person must first have had the belief which provoked and warranted consideration of it. So, if a person truly believes in the only concept which amounts to all considerations, all evaluating as True, all going into one another, producing the state of All in All, then there is no death within that person, but that person has eternal life inside of themselves, and will not see death, as Jesus said: "Very truly I tell you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life and will not be judged but has crossed over from death to life."

And also: "Anyone who loves me will obey my teaching. My Father will love them, and we will come to them and make our home with them."

Shrapnel

Article: "this is how social media affects your brain"

Article: Teens: this is how social media affects your brain



i.

Belief causes considering because the meaning of all things is derived from the space each thing takes up in the complete everything, and the proximity and relative nature of each thing to each other thing. Belief means 'Why' to the considerations that form the concept of what is believed in, and causes considering. And Meaning is the output of considering. Connections between synapses in a brain are the ‘because’ between considerations. A determination creates a wall between considerations which prevents a connection from forming between them, and creates negative consideration value within an environment of considerations. Everything that is visible in society is the manifestation of the things which people have either considered, or made determinations against.

A determination, which invokes the considerations which mean the concept of 'these considerations but not these others', forces a strengthened 'Yes' towards some considerations, while falsifying a wall of 'No' towards others, breaking connections and creating opposition between considerations which are connected in the truth. Opposition is a negative force which also creates resistance, and leads to the determined-polarization of mind which is psychopathism. Reason is the truth being spoken, in reaction to a belief. And if a belief is good, then the considering it produces will lead to the harmonization of all considerations, in the way which they all equal one.

But the more a person has falsified their mind, the harder it is for them to consider. And there are many people who have no recognition for what considering is, and who do not know how to engage it. But when a person can engage it, due to the truthful makeup of their mind, they can consider anything they choose to believe in the truth of, and quickly, because there is no resistance in the truth, and because the truth already Is, and only needs to be considered.



ii.

What is described in the article is the product of people who have believed that approving evaluation by other people is of utmost importance, and so, because of Reason, their brains have considered the connections which deliver the message that everything is good when the concept of this approving evaluation is fulfilled, causing the people’s concept of themselves as being OK to evaluate as True, which resolves worrying and uncertain considerings which were using up their dopamine-availability, causing that dopamine to be returned to free availability, which makes them temporarily feel better,
having secured their quick fix.

It would be better for those people if they simply increased their dopamine via natural means, like cocaine, rather than falsifying their entire brains and influence in this world just to chase a temporary and fleeting sense of being OK, at the cost of making their entire composition a falsehood that accomplishes nothing lasting or good.



iii.

'Reward' as motivation being taken as a human truth is the concept of people who are more primitive than cavemen, who just happened to be born in a later age.

There is no "reward centre" in a brain, and a person whose guidance is 'Reward' has the definition of psychopath written into their neural network, and evaluating as True within them, short-circuiting considering, causing the undue freeing up dopamine, making the person highly functional in a society which has been shaped around the determinations of sociopaths for only their benefit, but while accomplishing of nothing much that is truthful or of long-term benefit to humanity. The very concept of dopamine as reward has been created by people who are sociopathic for them to justify the personal leverage they have created for themselves over society. Every 'Reward'-oriented person is a tyrannical dictator who self-justifies the leverage gained by their offenses as their personal reward for being evil, and all the sufferings in society and the world are only the negative consideration value left in the wakes of their determinations.

The truth is not reward for being, it simply is. When a person acts out of seeking reward, they are not being equal to the truth, and they are being less than the truth. Therefore, when a person seeks reward, they evaluate as False against the truth. And a person who has aligned their entire disposition to be for reward has made their whole being into a falsehood.

An ideology which is centered upon looking at people as being corrupt and False-evaluating is not useful for healing people, as healing people of afflicted states is a matter of accepting the truth of what makes for the difference between a troubled and a healed state.



iv.

Since people like this have considered the constant approval of others to be their truth, therefore when they lack it, their brain, which is constantly trying to maintain the state of True evaluation, starts considering why, how, etc, in order to fulfill the greatest belief within the person. All that considering takes dopamine, and reduces the person’s overall dopamine-availability, and enabling the sense of an increase in well-being, which comes from dopamine, once the work that was using the dopamine is resolved, and the dopamine is returned back to its available state, ready to be used for other work.

It will be no different if a person considers pouring hot-sauce in their belly-button, or any other inane activity: Whatever a person believes in which consider within their brain, to make their person's well-being status as OK only evaluate as True when the concept that is their belief is fulfilled, which will always free up dopamine, since those considerings, conscious and sub forefront-conscious, will be resolved once their reasons are fulfilled, and considering is the work of a brain, and the work that requires dopamine to connect pieces of information in new ways.

And so, that interaction of dopamine is not particularly a person's brain on social media, but is the biological mannerism that occurs as a person fulfills whatever concept they hold to be of primary importance to their status of being OK, and reason to no longer consider things related to their status of OK evaluating as False.


Dopamine’s return to availability is not reward, it is not a bonus… it is the baseline environment a person needs to function and develop, and for a brain to be capable to do all its work, which is considering.

What does it mean when people condition their whole lives on the belief in a falsehood?

Shrapnel

ASMR Response is Dopamine / Understanding Dopamine’s Experience in a Body

ASMR stands for Autonomous sensory meridian response, and is the producing of brain and body tingles and relaxing sensations though auditory “triggers”. There are many YouTube channels dedicated to delivering this type of experience.

Not every person is immediately responsive to ASMR, just as how a thing is considered by a person changes what influence, if any, it will bear within them.

But for those people for whom ASMR is effective, when immersing in sounds and sensations that have considered since your earliest days as a human, to hold relaxing, calming, safety-reassuring, and intimate meaning, the recognition of those associations invokes Reason’s principle, and it relaxes processes within a person’s brain, freeing up potentially very significant amounts of dopamine (more than typical prescription medications will provide a person with).



Also, just like ASMR’s responses can be experienced throughout the body, not just in the head, it is likewise with dopamine’s release. I previously mentioned that an orgasm is entirely the experience of a small surge in dopamine being release in part of a brain, and I’ve also said that when high doses of cocaine are taken, that the same experience occurs throughout a person’s whole body. All the synapses in a brain correspond to something within the human body, and when a synapse becomes flooded with dopamine, the area which corresponds to it will feel good. For lack of having experience, most people may think that the feeling of an orgasm is something unique to sexuality – but this is not the case. That same experience will occur from any and every area and part of the human body, if dopamine is filled in the synapses which correspond to that area of the body.

The feeling of goodness caused by dopamine in a part of a body is also a positive comment on that area of the body, letting it know that it is ready and strongly supported for robust and accurate functionality, and that it has the means to do whatever it needs to, and that experience and knowing is shared throughout a person’s mind and body.

While having dopamine flood synapses which correspond to genitals might (or not, depending on a person’s consideration) provoke a person’s sexual interest, the same is not true regarding having dopamine flood synapses which correspond to non-sexual areas of their body. There is nothing specifically arousal-producing about dopamine, but dopamine is physio-fuel for all a brain’s work, and the more of it that is available to a synapse, the stronger, healthier, better-functioning, alive and awake the physiological processes which listen to that synapse will be. Dopamine really is life, and fullness of life-giving to the brain and body, and as such should be regarded as a first recourse in addressing and preventing health situations – because dopamine is, by natural and good design, a primary consideration to all a brain and body’s work, and everything else exists downstream and is conditional to having enough of it available. To not embrace dopamine is to be in resentment and loathing of one’s own state of being human, and spiting of one’s own better health.



A person who seeks the ASMR experience is seeking the same thing as a person who uses dopaminergics, and is also mostly getting the same thing as a person who uses dopaminergics like crack cocaine, or methamphetamine.

The positive therapeutic effects of ASMR are the positive therapeutic effects of increasing dopamine availability within a brain, and therefore the positive therapeutic effect of using cocaine. Though I would not say that it is equally the therapeutic effect of all dopaminergics, which typically allow adrenaline to increase alongside dopamine, because that adrenaline increase is antagonistic towards stress states, and makes for a very different experience, more challenged experience than dopamine’s increase all on its own.

If a person receives a strong effect from ASMR, then they can understand what cocaine feels like, knowing that experience for themselves, and being a partaker in that experience. Of course, by using cocaine, that experience can be made much greater, penetrate more deeply, and be more consistent, and work even with people who don’t react greatly to ASMR. Understanding this, a person who is familiar with strong ASMR responses should easily realize how positive cocaine use is for stress states, and for positively and successfully addressing various negative health states.

Shrapnel

There is No Such Thing as Too Much Dopamine as an Ailment

i.

Serving as an example of another perfect inaccuracy in medical attribution, there exist recommendations of lowering dopamine to deal with certain behavioural issues, such as impulsive behaviour, including addiction - neither of which are caused by having too much dopamine, but by the connectivity of a brain having considered in a manner, or been collapsed into a manner, which guides behaviour down such avenues. The high dopamine is caused by the low consideration - and not the impulsiveness (which is a product of low consideration) caused by high dopamine.

Diverting attention from the actual root causes of those behaviours, which is the consideration that guides them, to dopamine, has deadly repercussions for millions of people around the world, and creates an atmosphere of ignorance that prevents truthful physiological understanding arising so that and real and positive resolutions can be had.

ii.

Considering is the work of a brain that requires dopamine, and which forms the connections in a brain that guide a person's behaviour - and well-considered connectivity is what normalizes a brain.

A person who has reduced normalization in their brain by making determinations can be vulnerable to impulsive tendencies, and may also have a surplus of dopamine availability from reducing the amount of work their brain is doing. The issue there isn't too much dopamine, but a lack of connection-forming consideration to make use of the dopamine that's available - and this state is called being a sociopath / psychopath.

When a person has impulsive tendencies (which can occur where there is dopamine deficiency as well), the sickness is not the dopamine that is available, but the manner in which the person has considered their mind. Dopamine doesn't make a person impulsive anyway - it is what gives a person all their control over their mind, and their potential for the mental work that is considering. And what they consider will develop the pathway that will guide their behaviours.

It is not justified, or appropriate to blame dopamine availability for particular people's behaviour, and then restrict everyone's access to dopamine so that hundreds of millions of mental stress sufferers are tortured and exploited, just so that sociopaths and psychopaths do not need to admit to and confront their personal flaws and selfishness.

As it is, the people with the problems inside of themselves are the ones designating institutional ailments and treatments. They're saying that any number of innocent people need to suffer and be denied their deserved cure, so that they can continue being well-comforted while playing out a facade.

In an act of ultimate irresponsibility, they are imposing the penalty of their own guilt onto people who have done nothing wrong. And they profit heavily as the main benefactors from the torture it causes those people, both financially, and in ill-gained reputations within society as carers of people - whose problems they are the cause of, as well as obstructions to the needed cure, as if profiteering off the suffering of others is the sociopath's reward for ensuring that the suffering persists.

Now that I have elucidated the matter and corrected the attribution of fault in an impulsive person from dopamine to a lack of sound consideration, there is no longer justification for withholding the proper treatment from those who need it. Sociopaths need to learn to consider, and people with mental stress need powerful dopamine increases.

iii.

If a person has impulsive tendencies, then it isn't directly because of dopamine in any way. Though if a person has allowed pathways to consider which cause impulsiveness, having dopamine available will have a role in helping enable those pathways to be engaged. But having dopamine available is also what will enable it to be corrected by considering - a person cannot make one change in their brain, for good or bad, apart from having available dopamine.

Addressing an issue by clamping down dopamine is only masking the problem, and is not addressing it at its root. And thinking of dopamine reduction as a tool to avoid the problem has very harmful, including deadly consequences for millions of people who require increased dopamine to be healthy and in control of their lives.

Decreasing dopamine is not a solution to anything, and is running away from personal responsibility. And it is only even conjectured to be a solution because those who suggest it are only personally familiar with having a consistent high level of dopamine, and with no alternate experience to contrast their own with, they are left egregiously unfamiliar with dopamine's actual effect and importance - and this makes the things that they propose and impose on other people based in ignorance and hypocrisy.

A person who is familiar with dopamine is not going to choose to lower it to address any specific problem, because lowering it will reduce the capability and quality of a great many things. Lowering dopamine only stands a chance to reduce impulsive behaviour by reducing work potential of a brain enough so that there's no extra capability to engage considerations further than basic awareness. Awareness itself will be decreased, as will positive experience of senses, critical thinking capability, creative expression, visual depth perception, aural articulation, energy, and more.

Lowering dopamine lowers a person's capability to experience, perceive, and engage life, and lowering dopamine to address a particular behavioural problem would be like a person responding to having a messy home by having their sight, smell, and touch disabled so that they don't encounter their messy home's unpleasantness, rather that tending to the mess by cleaning it up.

Lowering dopamine is avoiding a problem, rather than dealing with it, and it is a selfish approach because it also encourages the continued victimization of many people who are being denied the dopamine they fundamentally require to be healthy, and to experience and enjoy life.

Shrapnel

Article: What Causes Autism?

Article: What Causes Autism?


Well, just as medications which alleviate symptoms of depression, anxiety, psychosis, tend to increase dopamine, so also do medications which alleviate symptoms of autism tend to increase dopamine. This all makes sense, since increasing available dopamine increases healthy development in a brain, while lack of dopamine leads to all types of mental stress ailments, general health problems, and impoverished brain development. So I would venture that autism, a development issue, is caused by a pregnant woman experiencing dopamine deficiency during their pregnancy, at least in some regions of their brain.

If so, then addressing the problem at its root would be to increase dopamine during pregnancy, to avoid unwanted development issues.

Of course, having more dopamine leads to improved health and development in general, while lacking dopamine means a greater vulnerability to health issues in general, and impoverished development in specific:
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2016/01/articles-poverty-may-alter-wiring-of.html
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2015/12/articles-stress-could-increase-risk-of.html
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2015/09/managing-and-increasing-dopamine-can.html
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2015/12/am-eclectic-assortment-of-articles.html
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2015/12/a-few-more-for-eclectic-assortment-of.html


And use of cocaine during pregnancy is shown to improve fetus development:
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/24283537_Prenatal_cocaine_increases_dendritic_spine_density_in_cortical_and_subcortical_brain_regions_of_the_rat


Also, cocaine, whose effect is to increase dopamine's availability while inhibiting adrenaline's release, delivers literally the antithetical influence as schizophrenia on brain development, boosting growth in the region associated with learning and memory, and like all dopaminergics, including the "smart drug" modafinil, enhancing a brain's capabilities (which would be relevant to enhancing fetus development):
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17641875
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2016/01/articles-study-suggests-genetics-could.html


And the myth of crack babies, babies being born with issues do to their mother using crack during their pregnancy, has appropriately been debunked:
http://articles.philly.com/2013-07-22/news/40709969_1_hallam-hurt-so-called-crack-babies-funded-study
http://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Family/2013/0725/Crack-baby-development-issues-not-side-effect-of-drug-but-poverty
http://www.businessinsider.com/crack-baby-myth-debunked-2013-7
http://www.salon.com/2013/07/23/longterm_study_debunks_myth_of_the_crack_baby/


It may well be that the very best thing for a pregnant woman to do to prevent health issues for their child, while fortifying their child's development, is put aside time to relax and smoke crack, or to take cocaine, while in their pregnancy.


But medical research cannot be relied upon to inform a public concerning this, because all scientific research, and particularly drug and health research, is egregiously biased, contrived, and unreliable, with at least (I will clarify this in another post) 60% of researchers publishing biased, and therefore False information as conclusions. And when it comes to drug research, I think virtually all conclusions are slanted (and therefore directing away from the truth). I would even say that a medical researcher is, by default, in the position of being an unreliable witness, since they, their field, and their funding providers stand to benefit from falling short of delivering real solutions (and this is a recipe for disaster in Reward-oriented mindsets, who are also sociopathic by nature, and therefore predisposed to being untruthful):
http://www.nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248

Particularly when it comes to drug and health research:
http://www.bmj.com/content/349/bmj.g7015

Which requires government license to study, and governments are not that likely to approve research which they don't like the objectives of, particularly when there is a history of such research being shut down, to go alongside with a history of such research delivering fabricated, or conniving conclusions:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/jun/13/bad-science-cocaine-study
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2016/01/looking-at-instance-of-deliberately.html
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2014/08/response-to-cocaine-study-bearing.html


I would put forth that 90%+ of what is read as health research is not true at all, and is either wilfully directed, or conducted by people who are sociopathic, who cannot arrive at unbiased conclusions because they have corrupted the connectivity in their brain that gives a person their perception - with the inter-connectivity between all considerations substantiating what is being what manifests truth.


Related post: Cocaine Use During Pregnancy Can Prevent Autism

Shrapnel

The Placebo Effect is Belief Freeing Up Dopamine to Help Healing Consider

Related previous post: Overview of Why Placebo Works, and Isn't Really Placebo After All


This post completes the understanding and the picture of what placebo actually is for human health.



Considering is the means by which a brain accomplishes all work, and dopamine's availability is what gives a brain its capability to consider.

Whatever a person's ailing state is, the brain addresses it by trying to consider its healing - and as it does, everything that's involved in its healing is called into effect. If there is little dopamine available, it will require more effort for a brain to positively address an ailing state. If there is more dopamine available, it will be easier for a brain to address an ailing state, and address it more comprehensively.

When a person believes anything uncertain regarding their health, or anything indefinite, or worrying, the considering processes that stem from those beliefs deplete a person's dopamine availability, reducing a brain's capability to address any afflictions. When a person believes, accepts, has faith and hope that their health is improving, that things are OK, that their medication is real and helpful, the effect on a person's brain is relaxing, resolving and desisting many considering processes and freeing up much dopamine.

The positive belief that a person has of their improving state creates a 'This is' point and understanding in the brain, engaging all the things involved in that concept and considering them towards a unified True, and available dopamine will be allocated towards completing that considering. Freed up dopamine contributes to the considering-unto-resolution any afflicted states, bolstering their overcoming and mending.

The greater a person's genuine belief in their healing, the more their brain will be considering towards that state of being healed - because of Reason, which uses dopamine to bring a person closer towards the state of being healed.

Likewise, just as cocaine boosts all positive mental capabilities by producing a proficient and healthier-than-natural release of a person's own dopamine, it can also be an excellent means to fortify healing from all things in general - whether that's physical wounds, mental health issues, emotional trauma, chronic pain, recovery from surgery...



Dopamine is key to a person's good physical and mental health, and their forward development. But while dopamine is promoting of beneficial physiological maintenance and development, adrenaline is antagonistic upon already-afflicted states. So, the secret formula to maximize speed of health recovery, and positive further development is to restrain adrenaline while proficiently boosting dopamine - which is the effect of cocaine.

Cocaine used to be regarded a miracle cure, useful for treating just about anything. Then sentiments, politics, ideologies (including racial prejudices), uncertainty, and fears came into play, but cocaine never changed. It still is the miraculous curative power it was initially regarded as being, greater in potential to restore and fortify health than any other medicinal means available to this world at this present time.



Cocaine is the penultimate poster-child of what thing is good for a person to put into their body to increase its health, and their positive growth. And all perceived threats regarding cocaine came not from cocaine, but from some of society's reaction to it - just as the outcome to Portugal's decriminalization of all drugs shows that the biggest threat involving drugs has always been the effects created by governmental and institutional opposition to them, and their failure to react sensibly.

There are questions regarding dopaminergics, health, and individual behaviour, and all of them have complete answers and positive resolutions, none of which indict dopamine, or cocaine - whose dopaminergic effect is already fundamental to all positive human experience, accomplishment, and potential. And all mental stress ailments, and many things which are not conventionally perceived to be a matter of mental stress, emerge only downstream from the malnourishment of having a lack of dopamine availability. To address all these things at their root is to accept dopamine as the fundamental mental-task processing-fuel that it is.



Placebo works according to a person's belief because Reason Is, and because dopamine / cocaine is the consideration which enables a brain to accomplish all its work. Placebo works because cocaine works because dopamine works.

In making known the "placebo effect"'s mechanism of action, I have now given full clarity to what has been yet another "long-standing mystery" to those who practice and preach institutional medicine.

Clearly, the understanding I work with is one and the same as truth, while that of those who call themselves scientists evaluates as False next to mine. And, clearly, the means by which I work are confirmed by the connecting of all points and accounting for all things, to be truth, just as by the things those means reveal - but the means of scientific methodology are falsehood-bearing jalopies in the face of reality. Therefore, a single person speaking in Reason is greater than the collection of all not yet in Reason. How many more miracles are needed to be spoken by me?

Shrapnel

Articles: Study Suggests Genetics Could Be The Root Cause Of Schizophrenia (*big yawn*, I already resolved this)

i.

Study Suggests Genetics Could Be The Root Cause Of Schizophrenia
Scientists open the ‘black box’ of schizophrenia with dramatic genetic finding


So this is what counts as a breakthrough, a crucial turning point, and watershed moment to those who call themselves scientists, and medical scientists. An observation with no perception of its meaning, and which is thought will take decades to lead to some kind of a solution for the ailment.

"This is the first exciting clue, maybe even the most important we’ll ever have, but it will be decades"

This is astonishing. It has taken a century to produce an awareness of a mere detail that is now speculated to take decades to turn into something real, when I, in the course of a year and some, have gone from very start to very finish of not just Schizophrenia, but of all Mental Stress ailment. And I did not start from the doctrine of institutional medicine, or with a background in institutional medical knowledge. I started from the beginning, and concluded the truth within months.



Now, going even further back than this post (A Gene is a Concept), I'd said that a gene is an encapsulation of a quality which considered in the brain to a state of certainty. I also said that considering is the mechanism behind evolution, and that what is fully considered applies back into the mind and body. This includes gene formation.

I've also said many times that the work that is considering in the human brain requires dopamine to complete, and that if dopamine is lacking, then the outputs of considering suffer, which is just as is the case in the previous post's first article. And, of course, I've been saying that all mental stress is strictly dopamine deficiency along the neural pathways which are trying to complete work in a process of considering.



Now, it's already known that stress can cause damage to genes, so this already rings true. And in fact, for what I'd written to be the truth, this influence would have to have already been happening, ahead of anyone's observation to corroborate it - not just that stress damages genes, but that mental stress is dopamine deficiency, and is what leads to the gene damage, just as it leads to the neural network damage in poor people.

So where is that connection in all of this? Well, I'd first like to make clear that it wouldn't matter whether that connection was represented in what a scientist, doctor, or medical research showed, because all that work is built upon the perceptions of incompetent sociopaths, and it is normal for them to misrepresent and miss-observe things, because they are wired for falsehood ('Reward'). It is only for the sake of reasoning with people who have accepted their words that I refer to their works.

Nevertheless, here is that connection:


"The findings may help explain the longstanding mystery of why brains from people with schizophrenia tend to have a thinner cerebral cortex with fewer synapses than unaffected individuals do," said a press statement from the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, whose experts took part in the study.

This is the brain's outer layer, often referred to as grey matter, involved in learning and memory."


Well, all this sounds awfully familiar. Hmm... where is a similar influence known to come from?

Article: Mice Fed with Cocaine Show Growth in Brain Areas Linked with Learning, Memory

Oh, so the same region whose development is impoverished in people with schizophrenia is bolstered by cocaine. And what is cocaine's influence? That's right: The healthier-than-natural release of a person's own dopamine within their brain, by proficiently increasing dopamine while significantly inhibiting adrenaline / noradrenaline. So much for that "long-standing mystery".

Now, I've also said this before: That, to neutralize a state of -1, apply an influence of +1.

Cocaine is the anithetical influence of Mental Stress, and cocaine promotes the healthy brain development that schizophrenia impedes. Mental Stress is simply dopamine deficiency, and that dopamine deficiency can lead to damaged genes, which corresponds with the understanding that stress can damage genes.

There is no room for a greater perfection than +1 being applied to a state of -1, to counter and resolve that state. To do so is the fulfillment of perfection, and to recognize the +1 to meet the -1 with is to become aware of the presence of truth, and to fulfill it is to bring the truth. Treating dopamine deficiency ailments with proficient dopamine supplication is bringing the truth of healing to that ailing state.



ii.

Also be aware that there are still problems with the other information presented in the article Mice Fed with Cocaine Show Growth in Brain Areas Linked with Learning, Memory, ones which I've already dealt with on this blog (here, and in other posts). And the biggest problem is the silly suggestion that cocaine boosts drug-seeking habits, rather than not simply everything that a person puts their focus towards, because dopamine is the means by which a brain accomplishes all considering work, and the brain's development is through iteration by considering.

It is a snide and objective-driven absurdity to propose that the development gained by the brain's increased capacity for healthy work while under the influence of cocaine's proficient increase in dopamine availability must attribute to something nefarious, when the same enhanced work capacity and development is manifest also from all other notable dopaminergics - including coffee and modafinil. The development is reflective of whatever a person puts their focus towards - be it studying for school, meditating to stabilize and organize one's mind, creative ingenuity, or to focus on problem solving. Dopamine is work potential, and a person who lacks it, needs it.

There is more to be said regarding that part of the 'cocaine boosts learning, memory' article which seeks to label cocaine's health benefits as somehow ominous (because they are coming from cocaine, and not actually on a basis that cocaine does anything negative), but I'll speak more of it in the next post. However, I tell you with surety, that the effort to malign the entirely-positive influence of dopamine's increase when it is coming from an illicit drug (illicit drugs tending to be much healthier than prescription drugs), is an act of murder within society, and that those who engage in it will be judged for it in the end.



iii.

So, back to the subject of the articles, regarding schizophrenia and genes... genes are an output of considering, which is dependent upon dopamine to complete in a healthy manner. Lack of dopamine leads to mental stress, which shapes the development of a brain's neural network, and impacts genes. If something’s going wrong with gene health, then there’s likely something happening with the considering processes that develops and maintains those genes.

The schizophrenia ailment, along with many others, is strictly a dopamine deficiency ailment, and its solution is proficiently increasing dopamine, while restraining adrenaline / noradrenaline - which happens to be the very influence of cocaine, which, as it so happens, alleviates mental stress and greatly increases the performance of mental facilities and bolsters the healthy development of a brain.

So, as one of the 'schizophrenia & genes' articles linked-to queries, the root cause of schizophrenia has indeed been uncovered, and for a good time now – but right here on this blog, and along with the root cause of all other mental stress ailments. And all of this before the so-called breakthrough observation by people who have no understanding of its meaning.  It’s not a complicated issue, in fact it’s a very straight-forward one – but trying to address it while at the same time denying its cause makes things pretty complicated.

As I said, a person who succeeded in a curriculum comprehensively made up of nonsense ideological drivel is probably not too smart – simply dopamine-equipped (due to not being particularly considering of the truth, but determining, AKA sociopathic).

What other group of people could spin their wheels for a century, be the cause of all the harms they profess to treat, and still receive positive recognition from society? I think most people would have been out of a job pretty quick after being so incompetent. And now these people foresee spending decades more while they filibuster the truth with their evil ideology, when the genuine solution was always out in the open, and not masked, except by those who call themselves scientists, and doctors.



iv.

As I've previously said, I still know everything more. And it's true, because I've resolved the issues of mental stress, sociopathism, and the foundation of existence by knowing Reason, which is the movement of considerations in which all things are accounted for to perfection. The movement of considerations is what brings the truth, and life. And eternal life is every consideration evaluating True into every other consideration.

The eco-system of the body begins with the heart, where belief is from. That belief travels as a signal to the brain, where it receives definition as it filters (considers) through all a person’s considerations as Reason's principle is carried out. And the brain’s neural network iterates itself based on the meaning of that belief in relation to the considerations which aspects of it pass through.

And all experience a person has in their environment is sending infinitesimal 'This is' messages to them, which are received by their belief, and consider through their mind, and their influence on a person depends on how a person is willing to consider them. And what a person sees as physical is made of this. All things are made of considerations.

And as I've been saying, there is no truth to a determination. When a person makes a determination, they're wrong as soon as they've made it. The truth Is, and it cannot be determined, but only come to be known by being considered. I know that's puzzling to some people's understanding, but this will eventually come to be understood by the whole world. A determination is a falsehood, and it reduces consideration. A consideration is a quantum of truth, and of mind, and therefore a determination reduces the presence of truth, and reduces mind. And so making determinations moves a person's perception away from the truth, and aligns their perception to falsehood, and sets it as antithetical to the truth.

Shrapnel

Articles: Poverty may alter the wiring of kids’ brains / Children from wealthy families grow up as extroverts, earn more in life

Article: Poverty may alter the wiring of kids’ brains

This is something that I've written about on this blog before, and I've said that the greatest harm done by poverty is the impact it has on a person's dopamine availability, which all development is conditional to.

The added stress in the lives of poor people creates more tasks for their brains, which drags on their dopamine availability, as dopamine is required to make choices, and worries involve lots of perpetual choice-making while a person tries to keep themselves afloat. This drag on a person's dopamine availability is what leads to depression and many other disorders, such as psychosis and anxiety.

Dopamine is what gives a brain its work potential, and when a brain's dopamine availability becomes impoverished, that gets reflected in its development. And poverty's greatest harm is the impact that it has on a person's dopamine availability, with low dopamine leading to all sorts of negative health developments.

Mental stress is literally a lack of available dopamine within a brain, meaning that a brain is trying to do more work than it has the dopamine to properly handle. Boosting dopamine conversely creates the opposite situation as that of a stressed brain, which is why "smart drugs" like modafinil, and other powerful dopaminergics like cocaine very effectively increase a person's cognition, control and accuracy of thought, and their overall working smarts.


Mice Fed with Cocaine Show Growth in Brain Areas Linked with Learning, Memory
Cocaine enhances memory storage in mice
Cocaine self-administration improves performance in a highly demanding water maze task.
Dopamine impacts your willingness to work
Cocaine study that got up the nose of the US
1995 World Health Organization cocaine report

Now, in the reverse situation, where worries aren't challenging a brain's dopamine budget, the opposite outcome occurs.

Article: Children from wealthy families grow up as extroverts, earn more in life

Dopamine's influence is simply like a dial that increases all a person's mental capacities when it is increased, and conversely diminishes all a person's mental capacities when decreased. A person's physical capacities are dependent upon their mental capacities, so these decrease as well with lower dopamine, and increase with higher dopamine.

Dopamine, effectively, is everything to human health, happiness, success, enjoyable experience, control. Because all these things are the expression of signals being able to be assemble, and considerations working with each other - and dopamine is the mechanism that lets any information assemble within a brain, and enables a person to make a choice. Without dopamine, a person can't know, and can't even know what it is they want to know. The human brain is wholly dependent upon having enough dopamine, and without dopamine, a person's positive brain activity stalls, and the person's life is left stagnant or in state of total dependency on things outside of themselves. But with dopamine, everything works.



Back to the second linked-to article, the less available dopamine a person has, the fewer and smaller the considerations they are able to work with at one time without becoming overwhelmed, panicked, stressed, exhausted, etc. The nature of being extroverted is the product of having the dopamine availability to power the sight of mind to see how things come together, to act and navigate comfortably within one's environment.

Also, memory formation and recollection is automatic when there is ample dopamine to handle the considering of experiences, which is what forms memory, and as experiences consider, they become a part of the structure of the brain.

People who grow up in non stressful households, to go on to have a good education and get a good-paying job, often attribute their success to their discipline, their good upbringing, their subscribing the right set of determinations. But as studies show, often the people who are the most functional and who achieve the most success are also the most psychopathic in society - which means they have fewer considerations, which is represented as less connectivity within their brains, which means that these who are among the most successful in society are also actually those who have worked the least, and made the least effort in society - but have constantly been rewarded for it by societal systems that are based on sociopathic determinations.

As I've said, a person's dopamine availability is a far greater determiner for a person's success in life than effort - and that effort only increases as a person's dopamine availability becomes limited.



The lower stress environments that some people grow up in often lead them to mis-attribute their success, and others' failures or states of suffering, to all sorts of determinations they've made themselves, or have been taught. But the reality of it all is that it is only because of how much work each others brain are trying to do, and what impact it has on their dopamine availability.

A determination, while made to form a conclusion that can serve as reason for things, is simultaneously a command to not consider the things regarding which the determination was made. And making determinations puts up many walls in a person's mind and brain. And these walls of 'do not consider' prevent the greater development of a brain.

The determinations a dopamine-rich person makes to rationalize why they succeed and others don't (often made in prejudice against those who haven't succeeded) actually lowers the amount of considering within their brain, and considering is the work that requires dopamine. Therefore, this results in there being more dopamine availability within the brain of a person who shuts down considering by making determinations, and who isn't willing to consider beyond their determinations - but at the same time, their determinations results in them not developing the connections and consideration which results from considering. So they consequently, for all their determinations, strong functionality, and memorized facts, are not particularly insightful, smart, or useful to the truth. But they feel extremely self-assured by their observable successes.



What has happened with society is that, in a tower made up of layers, where each higher layer represents people of a greater complexity of consideration development, smarts, ingenuity, and positive potential, the highest 1/3rd or greater layers have been removed from the top, and placed at the bottom of that tower, because of the determinations and dopamine policies of modern society. The smart people don't even know that they're amazingly smart, because their awareness isn't there due to their dopamine impoverishment as a result of them trying to consider as if true everything in environments built to reward sociopaths for being sociopathic.

I've questioned before how a truthfully considering person could possibly succeed scholastically, when the information presented is simply constructs of static determinations, which don't add up. If a person succeeds in school, even though they're smart by contemporary barometers, they're probably not too smart. Scholastic success is simply the result of having dopamine for fact memorization, which having is regularly the result of being a less considering person.



The lower a person's dopamine availability, the greater effort it takes to do everything. Many successful people, even though they think they've worked hard according to their known experience, are putting out less effort in a week, or month, or year, than many people with low dopamine availability are putting out in a day. And yet society hasn't clued in to the reality that everyone is not working at an equal level, all because of what dopamine is.

So clearly, dopamine cannot be reward, because dopamine comes before all reward, and is enabler for the work that might lead to benefit. As I've long been saying, dopamine is mental task processing fuel, and the means by which the brain accomplishes all work - and without dopamine, work is not possible for a brain, leading to all kinds of suffering, ailment, death, and dependencies.



In the case of doctors, we have people who are of very high dopamine availability, combined with very low considering, very little experience, and a predisposition to making judgements about people of dispositions and experiences that they do not even know or believe exist, based on their ignorant and sociopathic observation. And the result is an ignorance and prejudice-driven industry, which is literally completely unnecessarily liquidating the most dopamine impoverished people, turning them into soylent green, where the soylent green is money.

And, consequently, the people who are doing this are responsible for the states they perpetually treat people for, because their doctrine and prejudices are the barriers that has ensured that the truth of mental stress and its ailments doesn't get addressed.



Because cocaine is the healthier-than-natural release of dopamine within a person's brain, and because increasing dopamine via medication normally has the non-beneficial and stress-worsening consequence of increasing adrenaline, and because all the brain's work is accomplished by having dopamine availability, human are effectively cocaine-based beings - meaning that the human brain runs on, and produces all its health and positive accomplishment by the very effect of cocaine. And when a person has a mental stress ailment, such as depression, anxiety, psychosis, PTSD, bi-polar, autism, schizophrenia, and more... that ailment is directly the outcome and expression of that person, or their parents, having not taken care of their brain and body's own natural cocaine needs.

All of these things are preventable, and addressable. But those practising institutional medicine need to let go of their persistent denial and to stop running away from the truth. They need to stop putting their ideology ahead of truth and people's lives, and be willing to face reality and address the root cause of mental stress and its ailments. And by doing so they will finally be able to stop harming the societies that they live in, and to stop being the real obstacles to genuine health and health treatment in this world.



By this knowledge, Mental Stress, and all its emergent ailments, become choices - both for the individual, and for society.

Shrapnel

Important Information on Application of Dopaminergism to Treat and Curing Mental Stress Ailments

i. understanding brain activity as both passive and active
ii. a listing of many applicable dosing considerations
iii. comparing dopaminergic usefulness using methamphetamine and cocaine as examples


i.

I've said many times that, for the sake of overcoming and curing an ailing state, what a person does while experiencing a big increase in dopamine is as important as that they do so. This is because a brain's routing of signals is both passive and active, and so whatever medication a person takes, its influence is contextual to the environment of activity which it is being applied to.

Dopamine is what gives a person all of their thought power and control, and adrenaline is what agitates stress states, so when a dopaminergic is taken, including both very non-optimized and minimally beneficial ones like most of the ones which doctors prescribe to people, and also extremely optimized and highly beneficial ones like cocaine, there is thrust being put behind various processes within the brain.

The signals within a brain are polar and subject to magnetism. So when a mind looks in a direction, there are things like Energy-Field Walls fading in to place within the brain, choosing where a signal can and can't go, and the stronger the emphasis of thought, the stronger those walls will become.

A person in a state of stress is often trying to get around these walls they've formed by their considering. But a person cannot overcome them by determination, as anything that follows their creation is an extension of the considering processes which formed them, and a lesser consideration to them. Any strengthening of effort to defeat those walls will first strengthen them beyond what the output effort to defeat them is going to be. To remove those walls, a person must relax, let go of that considering, and as that considering becomes less the 'This is', the more those walls will fade. To control a person's mind to relax, they will need enough dopamine to take control of the thought processes involved.

The point to which the mind is looking is going to form the 'This' directive within the brain, and will be where available dopamine flows to. At the same time, the things which a person is trying to not look at within their brain, things which are worrying them, or that they're trying to avoid focusing on, are going to become increasingly agitated by the increased availability of adrenaline / noradrenaline.

A person in a highly stressed state, whose mind is in a panic and takes an inefficient dopaminergic (one which produces an unfavourable Dopamine:Adrenaline ratio), is going to experience an uncomfortable polarization within their brain between the points of controlled focus, which are promising something great, and the areas of avoidance, which are building in worry. Often, the build-up of adrenaline/noradrenaline's influence isn't going to exacerbate the worried considerations so much that they interfere with the bulk of the increased dopamine experience. But at the same time, if areas of the brain are being agitated by adrenaline into greater stress, that's not being productive towards the goal of curing the whole brain.

Psychosis is simply extreme stress, and when a person taking methamphetamine, adderall, or whatever, including many non dopaminergic drugs, experiences a drug-induced psychosis, it's due to considerations being walled-off from control, and collecting all the growing stress influence within the brain like a capacitor. The state of meth users tweaking after having used the drug for a long period of time is caused by this. They've formed concentrated node of highly distressed consideration within them, while they've been constantly compartmentalizing their focus on the positively-powered considerations.

This same dichotomy between positive and stressful influences, caused by adrenaline increasing unfavourably next to dopamine, is what causes instances of agitation, zoning out, and paranoia with some cases of dopaminergic use.

The goal in treating mental stress cases is obviously to resolve stress states and not cause them, and states of agitation can be avoided, controlled, and reversed by understanding dopamine, adrenaline, and that how they distribute throughout the brain is both passively and actively.



ii.

Some of the mental stress-treatment considerations that will work in agreement with the way dopamine and adrenaline apply within the brain are:

- Take whatever dopaminergic has the most favourable Dopamine:Adrenaline ratio. Always use the dopaminergic that pushes Dopamine the most while keeping Adrenaline / Noradrenaline restrained the most

- Dopamine releases a few seconds ahead of Adrenaline, and its positive influence will rush unimpeded for as long as adrenaline's rise doesn't show up to form a counter-weight effect. Because of this, the first few seconds of a dopaminergic dose are not only the most productive part of a dopamine increase, it also creates a very valuable buffer against adrenaline's chance to introduce a stressful influence

- Don't micro-dose. If doses are increased in small increments, adrenaline will keep forming a counter-influence before dopamine's increase gets going really fast, creating less of a buffer between dopamine's influence and adrenaline's, and losing the most valuable and most curative part of the dopaminergic effect

- Ingest by the most immediate-acting method that makes sense for a situation. A slow-acting dopaminergic increase will not produce the same window for dopamine to establish itself ahead of adrenaline's onset


So, push the Dopamine:Adrenaline ratio as high as possible in favour of dopamine, and as fast as possible. Dose once and make it as big as can safely be done, and then let everything return to normal before dosing a second time. And again, the second time, dose big and only once. Basically, the truth of treating and curing a state of Mental Stress calls for completely dismissing institutional and practitioner dosaging sensibilities on account of them being irrelevant, detrimental, and antithetical to the truth of positive health and its good treatment.



Some of the Mental Stress-treatment considerations that will work in agreement with the way a person's mental focus influences things are:

- Meditate beforehand to bring the mind to as much of a standstill as possible

- Fighting thought directions will strengthen those Energy-Field Walls, while relaxing and letting go in an environment of dopamine availability will result in the considering that is creating those walls to resolve, and the walls to dissipate

- Don't busy oneself while applying a dopaminergic increase. Doing so will focus the dopamine gain on active processes, rather than passively resolving troubled states within the brain, and will also serve to feed stressed states by starving them of a more even dopamine distribution within the brain

- Micro-dosing also generates many new taxing processes within the brain involved in tending to micro-dosing. And the whole point of positively addressing Mental Stress states is to resolve processes in a brain that has become over-taxed with them, relative to the present dopamine availability. So, again, don't micro-dose, and don't busy oneself. A person who practices being in a meditative state will be able to feel and see all the considerations as they move into states of resolution

- Nobody knows better than you regarding what is helpful for your mind and brain, and your experience is considerations evaluating as True, and they inform you of the truth. So don't let a doctor peddle their ignorance and ideological crap in your face



Even a state of high mental anxiety created by dopaminergic usage can be solved by taking enough more of a dopaminergic drug to completely tilt the Dopamine:Adreanline ratio in favour of dopamine enough to handle all of the uncontrolled stressed processes within the brain, and when a tweaking meth user is desperate for more meth, that's the state they're trying to get to. But smoking meth causes a very slow and gradual increase of dopamine, and so it's possible that a person tweaking might only make their agitation worse by taking more.



This isn't an entirely comprehensive list of factors in applying dopaminergism for the sake of treating and curing a state of mental stress, but it provides some important understanding. And with a complete understanding, a person can treat themselves and sail completely safely onward to improved well-being.

iii.

------------------------------------------------ side note ------------------------------------------------

Methamphetamine actually has a superior Dopamine:Adrenaline ratio to typical prescription dopaminergics, so that should inform a person of just how ineffective, useless, and designed to lock in a person's ailments to milk them for profit licensed medication actually is. Also, methamphetamine can be used to great success for mild stress states, if used knowingly, and it also used to be used (more successfully) for many of the things which now less-effective medications are being used.

If methamphatmine can be represented as:

Dopamine ++++
Adrenaline +++

Then cocaine might be representable as:

Dopamine ++++
Adrenaline --

or...

Dopamine ++++++
Adrenaline +

Cocaine actually inhibits adrenaline's release, so that there's a diminished amount of adrenaline being released per measurement of dopamine, but as when taking cocaine the concept is that dopamine is getting boosted significantly, there's going to be an overall smaller increase of adrenaline's presence.

Cocaine pushes dopamine so far beyond adrenaline that it is very rare for a person to experience a growing agitation (although street-sold cocaine is notoriously impure). And when used knowingly, the risk of agitation while ingesting cocaine can be completely removed for even the most dire stress cases.

Shrapnel

The Power of a Synapse / Consideration, and Dopamine's Role in Effort

i.

To perceive a single synapse’s state and influence within a brain, it can be thought of there being a line of neutrality (0) with positive and negative scales extended above and below it, and a point on that scale which can move incrementally both up and down, to hold positive values, and negative values. The further below that line the value for that synapse is, the greater an opposing influence that synapse’s particular consideration provides towards the body of considerations it contextually evaluates as True within. The higher above that line the value is, the greater positive contribution that synapse’s particular consideration is towards whatever it contextually evaluates as True within.

The same consideration in a different placement and timing can yield drastically different outcomes, and experience – as experience is one consideration passing information to another. Every harmonized body of considerations needs the same quantity of dopamine to evaluate as True, and so multiple different bodies of harmonized considerations require multiple quantities of dopamine more than a single body of harmonized consideration. A stress burdened brain progressively fractures into smaller groups of considerations, and as it does, its workload becomes increasingly greater, and the dopamine needed to handle its workload and to bring its considerations back into harmonization increases.

Also, the polarity of a whole multitude of considerations that are harmonized into one body can be flipped by another single consideration bringing an evaluation of True or False to what that body of considerations is to a person's belief, focus, intention, etc, and changing that one consideration again can again shift what that whole multitude of considerations contextually means.


A person can’t move a dislodged consideration back into place without the leverage that is dopamine any more than a piece of hydraulics equipment can lift a heavy load without having enough pressure in its system. Depending on how much dopamine is available within their brain, disorganized considerations can move back in to positive place with great effort, but with greater dopamine, the same work can be accomplished within the same brain effortlessly.

When a person focuses, or makes effort, their effort succeeds on the basis that in their brain they were prioritizing dopamine allocation to the processes which their efforts pointed to. When dopamine is increased, a person doesn’t need to focus and make effort as much to handle the thing which is their priority, and with greater dopamine, a person can multi-task more within their brain, and with very high levels of dopamine released within their brain, a person can even effortlessly work simultaneously on multiple tasks that would normally seem very unrelated and needing of multiple brains to work on.


ii.

It can be that there is not enough available dopamine within a person to even have a task succeed after all prioritization through effort, and that all continued effort is going to worsen things, because the processes that are being emphasized themselves don’t have dopamine to succeed, and so they are pushing False states of considerations to evaluate as True in the context of their objective, making failure consider into the outcome.

An example is when a person in frustration keeps trying to repeat a same action over and over, and becomes worse at it each time they try, that bit of worsening with each successive try is due to diminishing dopamine that is available for the task.

For the action to evaluate as True as a whole, all its components, made of bodies of considerations, also need to evaluate as True. The failure in execution is some needed considerations not evaluating as True in context of the whole concept, and the reason they’re progressively falling into failure is that the person’s dopamine is becoming increasingly limited as they try to do the same thing again, with new added work as they try to correct something from the previous attempt.

The solution that will lift them out of a state of failure is the increasing of dopamine – whether they pursue that increase through ingestion of a drug, or by leaving the task alone until a later time (freeing up the dopamine that had been allocated to those tasks), the root mechanism behind their later capability is the same – an increase in their available dopamine.


This is also an example of how a determination is a falsehood. Some people think that if they are determined enough, they will succeed. But it is only the successful considering of success, by allowance of there being dopamine for it, that a person succeeds. A person can take their determination as reason for their considering of the success, but the determination itself was only dead weight, which they may have had obstructing consideration within them for a long time. And because of how their belief was wired, moving it produced reason for their brain to prioritize dopamine towards considering the success they sought. This last part is something that can be explained in better detail at another time.

If a person recognizes this condition of diminishing dopamine availability, they can know that any further attempt is only locking their failure in further, and help themselves by not continuing their repeated efforts. And by learning to recognize what is going on with their dopamine availability, a person can know with certainty what the outcome of their efforts is going to be before even doing anything. Understanding dopamine grants a person new perceptions that they would have been unfamiliar with before, perceptions which make their previous ways obsolete, and of extremely poor efficiency.


With enough dopamine, a person’s actions can be as precise as any computer, in carrying out whatever considerations they have. Because like the values within a computer, the considerations within a brain hold values and meanings that are perfect in precision. Having a huge surge of dopamine doesn’t mean that a person is instantly perfect, but that they have the means to develop however they are willing to consider. But without dopamine, a person cannot make one controlled change within their mind and brain.


iii.

Effort is only required in the absence of dopamine, and the less dopamine that is available, the greater effort will be required.

Knowing that there is such a state as every chosen thing being effortless and non-discomforting, a person can accurately gauge their dopamine states by the amounts of effort they experience in the things they do, and a person can gauge their own dopamine shortfall by experiencing the absence of hydraulic pressure to accomplish the things they wish they were accomplishing. And all depression, no matter how severe, is only the absence of dopamine’s lift power.

The information which a brain tries to lift itself has consideration value, and weight that contrasts with the lift power of a brain, and when there is weak lift power within a brain, the information being lifted can begin to fall against that brain’s lift power. The only safety net at the bottom are the considerations that are synced together and delivering positive messaging. That body of considerations holds a belief, and if that base belief in a person becomes troubled, then it no longer is acting as the same positive platform within that person’s brain that it was earlier.

That body of considerations is delivering a ‘This is’ statement to all things that consider through that brain, and experience is one consideration passing information to another. And so if the ‘This is’ changes, then so does the experience of the person. All interactions that a person has with the world are forming tiny ‘This is’ statements throughout their brain, whose meanings and values are relative to the belief already held within their brain.


The effort that can’t overcome even the smallest of things in a dopamine starved individual can move mountains in a dopamine plentiful person. In fact, many, even most of the people who are successful in life never know the experience of strain that those at the bottom struggle with every day, and the only difference between their states, which is responsible for where a person’s ends up, is how much dopamine they have available within their brain. Likewise, those at the bottom do not know the natural states of comfort that exist in those who succeed, which is produced by their dopamine availability, and which enables success. The difference in outcomes that is possible to be created between dopamine dispositions is far greater than that created by upbringing, access, funds - and those things’ greatest leverage against a person is the influence it has on their dopamine disposition.

People from diametric dispositions (such as a doctor vs a person with psychosis, depression, or severe anxiety) use the same words to describe striving, effort, energy, capability, but the experiences to which they point within their minds are completely obtuse, and neither can know that the others’ understanding of it exists apart from entering in to it themselves. But, unfortunately, those at the bottom are being treated and dealt with according to a standard that they haven’t before known even exists, and all their considerations align only to experiences they know of, which means that there is a chasm of difference between understandings while people of either disposition communicate using the same words. But at its surface appearance, it will appear as if both are engaging in a shared language, and both can only assume that this is the case.

This means that the experiences, understanding, doctrines, theories, and especially the prejudices and ideologies of the typical doctor are of no relevance to helping people who are suffering, because the things they hold to as facts and acceptable practice are developed by people of an non-relatable state of existence, and administered by people of an non-relatable state of existence, and are antithetical to truth – and treating a state of health is a matter for truth.

Shrapnel