Article: Asthma drugs may reduce Parkinson’s risk (yet another lap around the same track)

Article: Asthma drugs may reduce Parkinson’s risk



i.

This isn't a mystery, and it shares the same explanation as a great multitude of other ailment-medication responses: Clenbuterol increases dopamine, and dopamine is the human brain's work fuel, and is what it uses to connect information across synapses. Any time dopamine is being increased, a brain's work capacity is being increased, and any time dopamine is reduced, a brain's capacity for work is reduced and stress is increased. Mental stress is merely a lack of dopamine availability within a brain relative to the amount of work a brain is trying to do, and is comparable to dehydration being a lack of water, and asphyxiation being a lack of oxygen.

Depression, anxiety, psychosis, ADHD, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, schizophrenia... they all emerge from the state of stress that is dopamine deficiency, and they can all be effectively treated, even cured, by increasing dopamine while inhibiting adrenergic influence. The interrupted fetus development that is autism is again a case of insufficient dopamine availability within a pregnant mother, and autistic child-births can also be prevented by ensuring dopamine levels are high enough relative to other things in a pregnant mother.

Relatedly, what is called the placebo effect is positive belief reducing the micro states of uncertainty and worrying (those things causing considering in a brain, which is the work of a brain for which dopamine is required), which reduces the work in a brain, which frees up dopamine availability for a brain, which consequently leads to improved health.

Most dopaminergics have an unfavourable adrenergic influence alongside their positive dopaminergic influence, and increasing adrenergic influence worsens stress states. However, cocaine is one dopaminergic which does inhibit adrenergic response, and is excellent at inhibiting adrenergic response while greatly increasing dopamine availability within a brain.

In fact, when applied with understanding, it is possible to flush a severe and long-existing psychosis from a person in just a mere couple of hours, or less, using pure cocaine.



ii.

And don't forget Schizophrenia:

Exhibit A) Study Suggests Genetics Could Be The Root Cause Of Schizophrenia

"The findings may help explain the longstanding mystery of why brains from people with schizophrenia tend to have a thinner cerebral cortex with fewer synapses than unaffected individuals do," said a press statement from the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, whose experts took part in the study.

This is the brain's outer layer, often referred to as grey matter, involved in learning and memory."


Exhibit B) Mice Fed with Cocaine Show Growth in Brain Areas Linked with Learning, Memory

Looks like we have a match!


It's also the same reason why Methylene Blue helps against Alzheimer's, why coffee does the same and can help a person to live longer, why Modafinil is a "smart drug", why teenagers who lack what fuels a person's working memory capabilities end up using dopaminergic drugs while simplifying life helps prevent future mental illness, why poverty has the effect on people that it does, and why a million other dopaminergics help against a million dopamine-deficiency ailments:

An Eclectic Assortment of Articles, Which All Receive Resolution by Understanding Dopamine

A Few More for: An Eclectic Assortment of Articles...

The Third Entry Into "An Eclectic Assortment of Articles, Which All Receive Resolution by Understanding Dopamine"


It's all one thing - same cause, same solution.



iii.

Dopamine is only "reward" to a sociopath, who, because of their low consideration, associates the increased dopamine availability they experience from doing the types of things which they have determined to indicate that they are good little dogs as being a confirmation of their good little dogginess. This understanding is an inversion of the truth. What's actually happening is the same thing as happens with placebo:

"positive belief reducing the micro states of uncertainty and worrying (those things causing considering in a brain, which is the work of a brain for which dopamine is required), which reduces the work in a brain, which frees up dopamine availability for a brain, which consequently leads to improved health, cognitive strength, and positive feeling."


To someone that isn't a sociopath, dopamine is not "reward," or something that comes in the end, but physio-fuel, and what is required to be there in the beginning for proper and intended functionality, and for proficient and healthy development. To human physiology, it is the god-molecule.


Conventional medicine is firstly about ideology and profit, and not truth. The truth is that an enormous host of illnesses, particularly mental illnesses, all only emerge and branch from mental stress, which itself is simply a lack of dopamine availability in a brain relative to the amount of work that brain is trying to accomplish.

And much research that is done concerning related topics is primarily about the researcher seeking to experience peer-approved "reward" for conforming to and supporting a dogmatic ideology.


To sum the situation up from one angle: Institutional and academic medical doctrine is fake. It is the 21st century's equivalent of practising the four humours, and would only be more so if the four humours was a patented practice that earned its patent-holders money every time it was practised.



iv.

because it strips them of all the determinations they've used as justification for


Why do today's scientists revel in historical stories such as Galileo facing off against an institution of dogmatic ideologues who had all the evidence they were willing to consider to prove that Earth is the centre of the universe, when today's scientists are the same as the people Galileo faced off against?

And this is a pattern that has occurred throughout history: An individual person considers beyond conventions because of the greater belief they have within themselves, and by their consideration discovers new marvels that they then make known to everybody.

But all those who move by determinations oppose the greater consideration presented, because what is presented strips those people of all the determinations they've made to justify themselves, invalidating their prejudiced judgments, their perceptions of their statuses, their reputations as knowledgeable authorities...

In time, however, the greater truth become reinforced as indisputable, and then those whose truth is their determinations begin to make determinations about everything surrounding the new thing and begin turn it into an ideology, an institution, and a dogma. Then, sociopaths from all over flock to that thing and conform to it, not because they understand and know it, but because the appearance of consensus is what they take as truth. And they reinforce that thing with all kinds of extraneous infrastructures, and wave that thing all around as their "proof" of many other things, including why they're smarter than the dogmatic ideologues of history who did the same thing as they are doing - because now they have the right determination to conform to and invest their sentiments into.

But the truth is not a determination.



Related post: Addendum to the Previous Post about Parkinson's Receptibility to Dopamine, And Also Something of Psycheparous

Shrapnel

Article: "Percocet Ruins Lives", But It Saved This Woman's

Article: Percocet Ruins Lives, But It Saved Mine

If the article's writer better understood what is actually behind the narrative and physiology that suggests a picture of dopaminergics and other drugs as ruining lives, it is likely she would only write the first part of her article's title in parentheses: "Percocet Ruins Lives", But It Saved Mine.

Anyway...

Here's a related post from this blog: Adendum - Migraines are Dopamine Deficiency - and also: The Importance of Tact in Dopaminergic Application - and also: The Importance of Considering the Truth



i.

Imagine seeing a starving person begging a very rich and well-fed person for some food, food that would cost the very rich and well-fed person nothing to give to the starving person, not even their time, because they were paid for the time in which the starving person begged for food from the rich person... and the rich person responded to the starving person, while standing next to a table covered in food, and piling up food onto a plate for themselves, by insisting to the starving person that they've done wrong by thinking they also need food, and that they have a problem of addiction, and that they need to re-evaluate their life in a way that will get them off of food-dependency.


That is a retelling of the exchange that took place in the link-to article, where the woman described:

Last year, while I was at school, I realized that I'd forgotten my pills while visiting home. I didn't notice until, later that week, a migraine came on. After two days of hell, I went to a walk-in clinic not far from campus. The doctor, a thin, grey-haired man, glanced at me through his glasses, and asked, "What brings you in today?"

"Well," I said, "I get migraines, and I've had one for two days now. I left my medication at home over Thanksgiving. I'm going home again next week, so I just need a couple to help me get rid of this headache."

"What do you take?" he asked, without lifting his gaze from the computer screen.
"I have a prescription for Percocet."

He turned and looked at me. "How much do those go for on campus?" he said sarcastically.

"Sorry, what?" I said, confused. I began trying to explain myself. "No, you see, I have a prescription, but I left mine at home and--"

"Ya, I'm sure you do," he said, and proceeded to lecture me about my "addiction," while writing me a prescription to "get me off of it."



So, what if a person who was starving and without access to food was asking somebody with access for food, and the person they asked responded condescendingly and scolded them for having a need of food? Wouldn't such a person who treats another that way qualify as a monster? But the experiences of low dopamine can easily be far more painful and torturous than the experience of starving from lack of food, or dehydration from lack of water.



The conduct of the doctor described by the doctor perfectly resembles what I identified in the post Article: Common brain signature marks autism, attention deficit:

I would presume that a lot of the medical professionals who read this blog don't like it when I write pointed accusations at them, since viewer numbers have always dropped off a steep cliff following such statement since the beginning of the blog, but so what? They're professional murderers and thieves of people's lives, and bringers of suffering to those around the people their doctrine steals the life from. Their entire ideology has been a harmful and indefensible lie, and they've been its advocates. If those whose lives, minds, and dreams have been taken or restrained because of their choices haven't been protected, and neither have been those who truthfully spoke their dopaminergic need, then why should be the egos of those who took those people's lives, minds, and dreams, and who prop up the most malicious and deceptive facade human society ever produced?

Do they condition their willingness to engage the truth upon first having their falseness accommodated and pandered to?


What did Jesus instruct? Was it to hypocritically scold, demean, and disregard whoever asks for something, or to "Give to everyone who asks you", and "Do to others as you would have them do to you"? Did Jesus add an exception of "except where sociopathic granfalloons come into play"?

When doctors base and make their whole lives around denying other people, those most vulnerable and suffering, theirs, as well as keeping them in a state of torture, and condescending, chiding, and shaming them for even just requesting what is their only true relief, how can it be substantiated that the doctors who do this are deserving of anything which they have made for themselves?



ii.

The woman who wrote the linked-to article correctly perceived that the increase in dopamine-availability which oxycodone (the main ingredient in Percocet) provides her is the authentic, needed +1 to her dopamine-deficient state of -1. Or, perhaps the dopamine she receives from the oxycodone in Percocet is only a +6 to her dopamine-deficient state of -17, and yet the difference of being raised to only -11 would still feel like a heavenly relief.

Meanwhile, the typical doctor is probably riding on a baseline dopamine platform of +50, which they produce for themselves by believing that they are good dogs for casting the peer-approved determinations upon other people. And they feel so aggressively entitled to that dopamine-rich state, which is their failure to consider, that it is rare for one of them to open their minds to considering the actual people that they practice their professional rape upon.

To properly care for a person, the person must be considered first. When a doctor is more interested in foisting their dogma upon a person who is suffering, it is not the person they are caring for, but their ideological granfalloon, which they adamantly adhere to so that they can tell themselves what a good dog they are, and shut down all considering work in their brain to induce a greater dopamine-availability. When a doctor acts as the one described by the woman who wrote the linked-to article, they are literally jacking off their brains via their sociopathic stupidity, while chiding a person for recognizing their personal actual need for the same dopamine that the doctor is desperately trying to build up in their science-addled brain.

But since for all things there is an ordering of considerations, and in a case of 'if one then not the other', when a doctor lets their dogmas and granfalloons evaluate as True, so that they can beat a patient with them, then their consideration of the person who is their patient evaluates as False. And without considering the person as they express themselves, they have not cared for the person.



iii.

Also, notice that the doctor described in the woman's article defaulted to a determination about the woman as soon as she described her situation and made her request. The considerations a person puts forth is rolling-out of a blueprint that reveals precisely how their brain is wired. In the case of the doctor described, that person has allocated their determinations to be of greater importance than giving room to let the truth be considered. Because a determination is a falsehood by nature, saying 'these considerations, but not these others', it falsifies the output of any considering that emanates from it:

The Will by which a thing is considered is the Will that is returned at the end of the considering. And the Will placed into a determination is an evaluation of False towards the truth, which is carried through all the considering that streams from that determination, and outputs a conclusion that will be perfectly-antithetical to the truth in some manner, just like in the case of 'dopamine as reward'.

Just as much as it is impossible for a mathematical statement to express a truthful answer if one of its variables is changed from its True form, it is just the same with considering. Determining a false ordering of considerations falsifies the whole work. And it is precisely and only because mathematics obeys the rule of Reason (which I will illustrate at some point) that it works.


 Because the doctor so easily imposed a determination, which he then proceeded to consider as True by act of will, it means that the doctor's mind is wired for falsehood, and that he is highly sociopathic. And because that doctor held their determination as True, from that point onward, he was unable to see anything clearly, and was acting upon a delusion from his own mind. And that delusion harmed the woman who had come to see him, and worsened her dopamine deficiency-based state of suffering.

Normally, when people act on hallucination and are dangerous to other people, they are sometimes locked up and put under observation. Shouldn't doctors be locking themselves up, since their entire ideology is a sociopathic delusion that has harmed, and is continuing to harm many millions of people? By not locking themselves up, to keep the public safe from them and the falsehoods they peddle, they are adding to their hypocrisy.

P.S. - psychology, psychoanalysis, tends to be drivel, but what I speak from shares the same exactness as mathematics, and is why mathematics bears truthful statements. If a doctor imposes a determination which they then consider off of as if it were True, they have formed, and are actively engaging sociopathic connectivity in their brain. And any efforts made though exertion of that falsified ordering of considerations will bear the falsehoods of that circuit passed on in their results. And everything traces back to where it originated, down to the very consideration, its evaluation, and all that made up its environment, including all the furthest reaches of existence.



iv.

Having started this blog due to what I discovered concerning my own severe health ailments, and their successful resolutions, after having spent many, many years as a victim of far too many doctors and specialists, I can state confirmation, that what the woman who wrote the linked-to article described about her experience with a doctor is normal, and that the caring of many, perhaps most doctors is so conditional and superficial that, often, all semblance of it quickly vanishes the moment anything about the doctor's own environment of personal comfort, which is their practice, their feeling of authority, their belief in a dogma, is put to test, even benignly. And the moment that happens, many, many doctors will abuse their position to inflict intimidation, condescension, or spite, even in ways that they fully know can or certainly will be physically or otherwise severely detrimental to a patient. Though there are exceptions, I believe that this describes the temperament of the average doctor, and that their self-assuredness does not come from actually knowing anything, but from the appearance of authority presented by their granfalloon, that they are giving themselves to.

But, when a doctor's caring for patients only exists within the pre-fulfilled context of their personal wants being pandered to, with their title, reputation, office, authority, salary, an easy access to drugs they prevent other people from accessing (depending on where in the world, a doctor is not allowed to write themselves prescriptions. But, a great number of doctors, including ones who are hard-line against writing opioid and stimulant prescriptions to patients, give themselves special prescriptions of these kinds by writing them using names of their family members, that they then pick up themselves, for their own use. Also, there are doctors who write each other friendly bonus prescriptions, thinking as if their special educations make them super-duper good for it), yet they aren't willing to consider anything that puts any of those things at risk, it means that they aren't genuinely caring about other people, but just themselves.



v.

When I read the woman's experience, I am filled with reminder of the awareness that what the doctor aggressively opposes for someone who is most desperately needing of it for her proper, natural health and well-being, has been the foundation for everything that the doctor, with great arrogance, seeks for himself, even through his lecturing of the woman in service of his dogmatic suppositions.

But the difference between the doctor and the woman's pursuit of the same dopamine is that the woman legitimately needed it, and was rightful in acknowledging that and pursuing it, whereas the doctor already had an abundance of it, stored up through the much less legitimate means of circumventing truthful consideration with his determinations. And perhaps he greedily sought more of it by way of congratulating himself for being a good dog by enforcing what is a false and evil ideology, all at the expense of a woman who was suffering specifically because she lacks in availability of that same dopamine - which, for the doctor, doesn't become more available from doing anything right or wrong, good or bad, but from believing to himself that he is now a good dog, resolving any prior considering of the situation and freeing up the dopamine that was being used to connect information required for the sake of that considering.



vi.

I hope that it has become clear to all who read this blog that what a doctor, scientist, or anybody has been justifying as their dopaminergic "reward", their self-pandering entitlement, and their right to feel superior because of their learnedness has actually been nothing more than their colossal inhumane, arrogant stupidity, and selfish bias.

Those who believe 'dopamine as reward' have defined goodness as whatever serves their own personal comfort and bias. Many doctors practice medicine on people because doing so means to them that they've now fulfilled the picture of what is good, and can feel as though they've done their bit, resolving considering in their brain, which delivers them "reward" - and not because they consider the people who have need for help, that they might become empathetic of them. But it is not an action that makes somebody justified or non-justified, but the reason why it was done, with account given for all considerations.

There is a difference between doing what is determined as good because is serves personal reward, and doing what is truly good because to do so is the truth, and so that goodness will be. The former can never be truly good, and the difference is known in the truth.



vii.

In the case of the woman who wrote the article, the doctor who abused her exacerbated her dopamine deficiency by presenting trouble, and non-truthful consideration by his words and attitude, which the woman's brain then had to consider the truth of in the light of a better belief, in order to overcome - and the work of a brain, which is considering, requires dopamine.

"Satan" means 'one who opposes', and this doctor was a satan to this woman, her health, and the truth. But, despite the evils of doctors and their doctrine, look at the final sentence the woman wrote for her article, and notice that she's found the perfect truth, and that the light of the truth has shone through her experience and words:

"I do not have an addiction. I do not have a problem with prescription drugs... I have a solution."

The publishing of her article shows that she did indeed overcome the stress inflicted upon her by the doctor - thanks, in part, to the increase in dopamine-availability that her Percocet provided her with.
But also because she didn't accept the harmful determinations the sociopath doctor imposed upon her, but instead considered her own experience, and had faith in the truth of the matter, which her own experiences taught her.

I think that it is time for society as a whole to overcome the harms and evil of self-"reward"ing doctors, scientists, and their false dogma.

Shrapnel

Further Information on "Addiction" and Drug-Associated Health Issues, and the Environment That Produces Them

i.

Anything less than True is False, and so it is in a mind, where concepts are made of considerations, which each have a polarity. For a concept to evaluate as True, all its considerations must unify into a True altogether. And if just one of a concept's considerations is aligned against the whole picture, and evaluating as True against that picture, then that entire concept evaluates as False.

If a consideration is aligned against the understanding that what a person does is OK, then that contrarily-aligned consideration is feeding a streaming +1 value against the person's confidence and security, which is a continual +(-1) being imparted upon their  wholeness. This progressively splits the person's mind with growing uncertainty, doubt, anxiety, which can lead to fear, and panic.

And when a person has taken a drug that accelerates the pace at which their mind works, then the descent into internal suffering is all the worse.



ii.

But be sure to make full note that this is not caused by the drug itself, and is a poisonous seed that was sewn in their minds by anti-drug messaging, and messaging of non-acceptance or non-approval for doing such things. The reality will still be that the dopamine which they seek from the drugs they take is still what their brain runs on, and what is needed to make the difference between their suffering and their well-being.

And then those who sowed that harmful self-doubting considering within the people who experience it purport to treat and "help" them, all the while profiting monetarily and reputation-wise off the states that they, and those of their professions before them created, and maintain in society. And then those people further "reward" themselves by fulfilling their determinations for what makes them personally a good dog, contributing to an ideology that is false, and their reward is a release of the same dopamine in their already over-dopamined brains as that which they work to prevent from being increased in the brains of those who need it most.



iii.

The choice to employ social engineering against people who engaged in drug use, which ostracized them and caused all the problems the institution then presents itself as being needed to look after was not done out of caring for the people who were being harmed, and a doctor who employs the institution's teaching does not firstly, and therefore genuinely care about the people they practice those teachings upon. But they are charlatans, who do the things they do, not with the truth, compassion and care for another person as their leading consideration, but because of what I've written in the post A Treatise of Existence, part 2:

When a person makes a determination, they align considerations against one another within their own mind, because of Reason, and the amount of space within their mind that they are able to exist in at any one given time, and have evaluate as True, is reduced, while at the same time, the number of considerations they experience as opposing what they’ve determined to be True increases.

Also, as a person increases the volume of consideration value within their mind that is negative, relative to their determinations, they will feel incomplete unless something fills that negative consideration value, something that they can label and target, and use to define themselves as good by defining good within themselves as being ‘not that,’ contrasting themselves against those things (for example, a physician often fills their negative consideration-value with determined concepts of people who use dopaminergics as having problems that need institutional defining and direction, and simultaneously define themselves as good for not being like this, and so are deserving of their determined concept of "reward," which is the same dopamine, only gained through false-pretenses).



iv.

All things are made of considerations, and whereas a person may do something and physical trace is no longer apparent afterwards, it is not the same with consideration. Everything is delivering consideration to everything else, and all consideration is accounted for in the truth. The consideration of what was done regarding these things remains, lingering in society, and its negative consideration value is tremendous. And here is what has been done:

Government, scientists, and doctors have spent decades disseminating false research and prolific messaging that instils uncertainty, nervousness, doubt, fear, feelings of non-acceptable drug usage, which causes mental agitation, divides a mind, and negative considering when a person takes drugs.  Then they work to convince people that they have a problem, when convincing them of such is the root cause of behaviour that is problematic. Then they use the expression of those things that were artificially put into people and society as justification for doing those things to people with their messaging and ostracization in the first place. They then feed institutions and "professionals" (who are charlatans that don't actually know anything truthful) who profit both monetarily and reputation-wise for "helping" people with the problems they and their institutions created.



v.

Further, because anything less than True is False, by imposing ideological determinations upon people who use drugs, that might convince them that there is a problem, that something is not fully right, that they would be better otherwise, they cause consideration towards the state of full well-being within the person to be aligned against their own state of full well-being, so long as they don't modify their behaviour, and in doing so, they not only create, but they lock-in, as perpetual, the person's state of feeling want and need.

And for those who they successfully convince of their determinations, to conform to them, who do so only to feel more accepted, such as the institution of Alcoholics Anonymous, are left in a state of perpetual imprisonment, not allowed to overcome that consideration that keeps them out of full-being. And because those people have accepted the determinations which are aligned against the thoughts and behaviour of allowing drug use, those people have accepted a prejudice into themselves. And these people are examples of who Jesus spoke of when he said to the Pharisees of his day:

"Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over land and sea to win a single convert, and when you have succeeded, you make them twice as much a child of hell as you are."



vi.

What is considered into a person become digested by their mind, and a part of their feeling and being. And just as with raising a child, a parent has the option of telling things which deliver positive consideration and build a child up and give them strength of character, or deliver discouraging and abusive consideration, which leads to all problems inside of the person, it is the same with adults: Truthful and constructive messaging will build an adult person, while antagonistic, demoralizing consideration will wear an adult person down until they are defeated.

Institutional medicine, government, doctors, scientists have chosen, for decades, to degrade, demoralize, deceive, to instil fear, worry, and doubt into people who use drugs, and to ostracize them for using drugs. If they had seen those people as equal and valuable, then they would have considered them as being equal and valuable. And if they had chosen to consider the person as equal and valuable, and delivered the messaging that affirms a person's right to choose, and to have confidence in their choice, then none of the problems associated which drug use would exist, because those problems are not caused by drug use at all, but by society's chosen reaction and attitude towards it.

It is exactly as written at the end of this article:

"It may well be that prohibition, and distribution of drugs by criminals, gives worse results for the outcomes we think are important, such as harm to the user and to communities through crime. But equally, we may tolerate these outcomes, because we decide it is more important that we declare ourselves to disapprove of drug use."

And it is because government, scientists, doctors chose to deny a person's right to choose over their own body, instead imposing their ideology upon people's bodies and minds, that they are equal to rapists: Because the effects of a person imposing their will upon another bears will always bear the same detrimental meaning upon the considerations of a person's mind, and that detrimental influence is the identity of rape. Do not judge by outside appearance, but judge only once having considered all things truthfully. And remember that I've said that the truth is one consideration giving itself to another with neither force nor resistance.

And all that people who practice rape as their profession have accrued for themselves in property and reputation is ill-gained, and stolen from those whose lives were raped by the messaging that was determined and imposed upon them. And this is the judgement that stands against those who did these things to other people: all the attributed ills of a drug-user's affliction are the debt owed by those who refused to choose a more considerate message to give to those people.



vii.

And beware of the behaviour that I described earlier:

Government, scientists, and doctors have spent decades disseminating false research and prolific messaging that instils uncertainty, nervousness, doubt, fear, feelings of non-acceptable drug usage, which causes mental agitation, divides a mind, and negative considering when a person takes drugs.  Then they work to convince people that they have a problem, when convincing them of such is the root cause of behaviour that is problematic. Then they use the expression of those things that were artificially put into people and society as justification for doing those things to people with their messaging and ostracization in the first place. They then feed institutions and "professionals" (who are charlatans that don't actually know anything truthful) who profit both monetarily and reputation-wise for "helping" people with the problems they and their institutions created.

Because this is typical behaviour of sociopaths: They make determinations to give themselves leverage.

A determination is a falsehood by nature, which says, 'these considerations and not these others', falsely strengthening some connections between considerations while simultaneously falsely weakening others, polarizing and biasing an environment of considerations.

Aligning some consideration against others creates a sense of absence for many considerations and those who share them, which is a perpetual need that does not heal unless the image of truth is restored. And so, for as long as that wound in the truth is prevented from becoming healed, it is an opportunity for those who made and perpetuate it to capitalise on the need, the suffering, and the confusion of those considerations which were attacked and abandoned. So, they impose a falsehood, which creates suffering and sense of need, and then they exploit the situation for their own personal gain.

And this behaviour is what institutional medicine is comprehensively about: Where governments whose pre-determined goal is to produce conclusions which support their drug-prohibition policies are also who license and regulate drug research (which establishes the doctrine from professional practice to academic study), where the companies that choose and fund the research that seeks and receives licenses are 'in the business of shareholder profit, not helping the sick,' where those scientists who carry out the selected, funded, and licensed research, and who produce its conclusions are "reward"-motivated to count-as-confirmed every bias which makes their employer more money and which gains them more recognition, control, and dopamine-availability increase, ... and where those who employ and enforce the narrative chosen by the former three groups have “reward” (increasing their personal dopamine-availability) as their primary motivation, and where those doctors, specialists, etc, have determined that “reward” within themselves to come from contributing to the doctrine that is a murderous lie.


As I've said before, Science, which is the practice of making determinations upon observation, is a method of falsification, and which is a tool of sociopaths, and which instils further sociopathism within a person's mind, and within society.


All the while, the truth is that mental stress, depression, anxiety, psychosis, ADHD, PTSD, autism, bi-polar, schizophrenia, alzheimer’s, parkinson’s, and a lot more, are all only caused by insufficient dopamine-availability in a person relative to the amount of work their brain is attempting, or being forced to consider, and that all of these ailments are completely preventable (and most of them fully curable) by taking cocaine in the right manner. Also also that cocaine, and other criminalized dopaminergics are far healthier and well-being producing that anything that exists within a doctor’s arsenal of effectiveness-reduced, side-effects increased, ailment locking-in pharmaceuticals, and that the real reason why cocaine is prohibited by an echelon of sociopaths from confident use in society, is this:

Because it proficiently works to prevent ailments, to heal ones that exist, to increase mental fortitude and acuity, making its absence seem too great a tool for societal and capitalistic leverage.



Related posts:

Where Does A "Drug-Induced" Psychosis Really Come From?
How Belief Affects Mental Stress Treatment, and the Effect that Anti-Drug Propaganda Has on Mental Health

Shrapnel

A Treatise of Existence, Part 2

When a person makes a determination, they align considerations against one another within their own mind, because of Reason, and the amount of space within their mind that they are able to exist in at any one given time, and have evaluate as True, is reduced, while at the same time, the number of considerations they experience as opposing what they’ve determined to be True increases.

Also, as a person increases the volume of consideration value within their mind that is negative, relative to their determinations, they will feel incomplete unless something fills that negative consideration value, something that they can label and target, and use to define themselves as good by defining good within themselves as being ‘not that,’ contrasting themselves against those things (for example, a physician often fills their negative consideration-value with determined concepts of people who use dopaminergics as having problems that need institutional defining and direction, and simultaneously define themselves as good for not being like this, and so are deserving of their determined concept of "reward," which is the same dopamine, only gained through false-pretenses).


In Reason there is all of Value, Meaning, Purpose, and Point, none of which are determined, but all of which simply Are. But a person who has falsified their mind by determinations is detached from all of these things except for Value, and often Value becomes their determined Meaning, Purpose, and Point, because they are no longer able to see and consider the things beyond.

And because such a person no longer naturally evaluate as True from within, due to their falsified consideration structure, they seek to align themselves to things outside of themselves, often around determinations shared with others, and they together create institutions, causes, carefully laid-out principles, organizations, ideals, pacts, all things which they think are what makes them good, as segmented conducts.


But because there is no truthful meaning to their determinations, the truthful consideration structure of the whole melts, while their determinations bind them to one another with the forceful pull of a black hole, and they become a granfalloon, which is a meaningless association of people, desperate to achieve a feeling of acceptance, purpose, and truthful placement by drawing in to their organization all those that they see outside of themselves as still having truthful meaning within themselves, thinking that doing so will increase the meaning of their whole. Yet, each one who is drawn into them becomes as them, and in the end their whole mass feels even more empty than before.

With enough dismantling of truth in a person’s mind though the making of determinations, what results is a consideration structure that is still made up of True and False, but that is no longer grounded in anything fully True. And without being grounded in anything fully True, that consideration structure isn’t stationary, but shifts, while retaining its form, to maintain its relative disposition amongst its considerations as the person who exists by it moves their determination of what is in order to suit their current experience. Such a person is transient in their principles, and move to wherever they feel the greatest sense of approving authority, of power, which is the accumulation Value that has become sclerosised around determinations.



In a perfectly-reasoned mind, the whole evaluates as one. And where there may be 12 considerations, each with their own +1 value evaluation to give to something (which is an evaluation of True to wherever they choose to give it), and all being considered perfectly into the truth and reasoned into one being, they become one mind and they all share the awareness of all and have the value of all, with their greater form again evaluating as one. But their shared identity as one is greater than the collection of all their individual values. Their state of perfectly-reasoned oneness fully exists within themselves, and is the light and multi-faceted dimension of all And each consideration of that reason now has greater authority and power than all less-tier considerations. While on their own, not yet within reason, every consideration experiences loneliness, and relative darkness.

When a determination is made, it declares 'these considerations, but not these others,' introducing falsehood into a consideration structure, and invalidating the presence of the truth, weakening and even breaking a truthful consideration structure, which will have lost its reason. And the point of falsification that was the determination, has no truthful Meaning, Purpose, and Point, but receives multiple lesser consideration-values of +1 pointing towards its point of falsification, which is an abyss. To a sociopath, who judges by making determinations based on appearance, and not from having considered all things truthfully and having the truth present itself to them, the appearance of +5, or +9, or any other number of lesser-tier considerations, pointing towards a determined cause, is presumed to have more authority than the perfectly-reasoned truth, which simply Is, and which all lesser considerations receive their true value from.

Shrapnel

Article: "this is how social media affects your brain"

Article: Teens: this is how social media affects your brain



i.

Belief causes considering because the meaning of all things is derived from the space each thing takes up in the complete everything, and the proximity and relative nature of each thing to each other thing. Belief means 'Why' to the considerations that form the concept of what is believed in, and causes considering. And Meaning is the output of considering. Connections between synapses in a brain are the ‘because’ between considerations. A determination creates a wall between considerations which prevents a connection from forming between them, and creates negative consideration value within an environment of considerations. Everything that is visible in society is the manifestation of the things which people have either considered, or made determinations against.

A determination, which invokes the considerations which mean the concept of 'these considerations but not these others', forces a strengthened 'Yes' towards some considerations, while falsifying a wall of 'No' towards others, breaking connections and creating opposition between considerations which are connected in the truth. Opposition is a negative force which also creates resistance, and leads to the determined-polarization of mind which is psychopathism. Reason is the truth being spoken, in reaction to a belief. And if a belief is good, then the considering it produces will lead to the harmonization of all considerations, in the way which they all equal one.

But the more a person has falsified their mind, the harder it is for them to consider. And there are many people who have no recognition for what considering is, and who do not know how to engage it. But when a person can engage it, due to the truthful makeup of their mind, they can consider anything they choose to believe in the truth of, and quickly, because there is no resistance in the truth, and because the truth already Is, and only needs to be considered.



ii.

What is described in the article is the product of people who have believed that approving evaluation by other people is of utmost importance, and so, because of Reason, their brains have considered the connections which deliver the message that everything is good when the concept of this approving evaluation is fulfilled, causing the people’s concept of themselves as being OK to evaluate as True, which resolves worrying and uncertain considerings which were using up their dopamine-availability, causing that dopamine to be returned to free availability, which makes them temporarily feel better,
having secured their quick fix.

It would be better for those people if they simply increased their dopamine via natural means, like cocaine, rather than falsifying their entire brains and influence in this world just to chase a temporary and fleeting sense of being OK, at the cost of making their entire composition a falsehood that accomplishes nothing lasting or good.



iii.

'Reward' as motivation being taken as a human truth is the concept of people who are more primitive than cavemen, who just happened to be born in a later age.

There is no "reward centre" in a brain, and a person whose guidance is 'Reward' has the definition of psychopath written into their neural network, and evaluating as True within them, short-circuiting considering, causing the undue freeing up dopamine, making the person highly functional in a society which has been shaped around the determinations of sociopaths for only their benefit, but while accomplishing of nothing much that is truthful or of long-term benefit to humanity. The very concept of dopamine as reward has been created by people who are sociopathic for them to justify the personal leverage they have created for themselves over society. Every 'Reward'-oriented person is a tyrannical dictator who self-justifies the leverage gained by their offenses as their personal reward for being evil, and all the sufferings in society and the world are only the negative consideration value left in the wakes of their determinations.

The truth is not reward for being, it simply is. When a person acts out of seeking reward, they are not being equal to the truth, and they are being less than the truth. Therefore, when a person seeks reward, they evaluate as False against the truth. And a person who has aligned their entire disposition to be for reward has made their whole being into a falsehood.

An ideology which is centered upon looking at people as being corrupt and False-evaluating is not useful for healing people, as healing people of afflicted states is a matter of accepting the truth of what makes for the difference between a troubled and a healed state.



iv.

Since people like this have considered the constant approval of others to be their truth, therefore when they lack it, their brain, which is constantly trying to maintain the state of True evaluation, starts considering why, how, etc, in order to fulfill the greatest belief within the person. All that considering takes dopamine, and reduces the person’s overall dopamine-availability, and enabling the sense of an increase in well-being, which comes from dopamine, once the work that was using the dopamine is resolved, and the dopamine is returned back to its available state, ready to be used for other work.

It will be no different if a person considers pouring hot-sauce in their belly-button, or any other inane activity: Whatever a person believes in which consider within their brain, to make their person's well-being status as OK only evaluate as True when the concept that is their belief is fulfilled, which will always free up dopamine, since those considerings, conscious and sub forefront-conscious, will be resolved once their reasons are fulfilled, and considering is the work of a brain, and the work that requires dopamine to connect pieces of information in new ways.

And so, that interaction of dopamine is not particularly a person's brain on social media, but is the biological mannerism that occurs as a person fulfills whatever concept they hold to be of primary importance to their status of being OK, and reason to no longer consider things related to their status of OK evaluating as False.


Dopamine’s return to availability is not reward, it is not a bonus… it is the baseline environment a person needs to function and develop, and for a brain to be capable to do all its work, which is considering.

What does it mean when people condition their whole lives on the belief in a falsehood?

Shrapnel

How Determinations Cause the Polarity of Considerations to Affect Sociopathism

i.

Considerations are polar, which means they provide a positive value towards whatever they point to, and a negative value for whatever they direct away from. And the signals in a brain are pulled along with magnetic force.

A mind is an environment made of considerations, and which adds up to One. Because considerations are polar, when a determination is made, a determination stating ‘these considerations, but not these others’ (because of Reason), it collapses consideration into a forced point (that is not truth-based), and all surrounding consideration are then pulled into alignment with that determination. The values given by considerations towards their destination is what creates the magnetism that moves and pulls signals through a brain, and so a determination then acts as a black hole of sociopathicness, with an event horizon that pulls any considering which comes near it in towards its centre of falsehood.

That is what is happening here:

Article: Over half of psychology studies fail reproducibility test

... and is the cause of the 61% irreproducable rate of psychology studies (which, as I said in this post, is a figure that is worse than natural randomness, and is a figure that means that psychology is steered towards the negative, away from truth), and is what happens whenever somebody believes in a determination, rather than considering what the truth is, apart from making any assumptions or determinations.

So, it is the considered truth that the majority of people who call themselves scientists are sociopathic, and so are incapable in their present state to ascertain what truth is.

And a determination which support a sociopath’s bias is like crack-cocaine to them, as making that determination invokes Reason, which then ceases the considering of things, with considering being the work for which dopamine exists in a brain to accomplish. Thus, dopamine is freed up when a determination is made, and a mind is relieved of some strain as its workload reduces. In the past, sociopaths have tried to justify their selfishness by considering this freeing-up of dopamine as being their “reward” for their being evil, lazy, non-considering, truthless sociopaths. In doing so, they are responsible for much of the mental health issues seen in society today.



Also, the figure of 39% reproducability-rate is still not going to be accurate, because that figure is still coming from people with notable amounts of sociopathicness within them, and the more sociopathic a person is, the more they gravitate towards Lowest Common Denominator-based perception (which is what a determination is, and often what people who call themselves scientists look for). This means that, while a consensus may be shared among a group of people who all adhere to a particular outlook and evaluation, that the evaluation and outlook of that group might be disregarding many considerations which they don't consider. But all considerations are accounted for in the truth, and each consideration makes all the difference, somewhere.

Also, the judgement of a 39% reproducability rate for human behaviour is a fallacy in that sociopaths and non-sociopaths are antithetical in their reasoning, how their minds work, and why they do the things they do, and the both of sociopaths, who are the majority of people in society, and non-sociopaths cannot be understood with a blanket teaching. What is good for one is not good for the other. And there exists every degree of different consideration between the state of sociopathic falsehood, and the truth, and they can only be engaged via consideration of each new state, and not with a blanket or even general teaching.

Sociopaths, who have reduced their own selves to Lowest Common Denominator behaviour and perception, tend to have lots of dopamine due to how little they are considering with their brains. And this makes them highly functional in a society constructed upon the imposed determinations of sociopath's, while those same determinations are what prevent good and considering people from being well functioning in the same society. Currently, less sociopathic people are being held in society as the prisoners of the more sociopathic people.



ii.

Article: Bias-oriented decision making

A bias is a falsehood, and a mind that makes decisions based upon contrasting biases holds bias, which is a falsehood, as True. And a mind that holds what as False as True evaluate False against the truth. The considerations a person expresses are the rolling out of a blueprint for how their brain is wired, and details all the determinations and consideration they have within them.

A person who holds a bias as True is a sociopath, and those who ascertained this study's conclusions are sociopaths, whose perceptions are based on holding as True determinations based out of the weighing biases. And that is but one way which a sociopathic mind can operate. Depending on the degree of sociopathicness in a person, judgement-making will occur in other ways - some more crude, and others more considering. But all degrees of falsehood-based judgement come from a mind that is sociopathic.

In various posts, I am giving details on how a mind moves by considering, and I will further show the way which a truthful mind establishes its choice, in other posts.


But as I said in the previous post:

"And even if I don't look, sometimes there are still multiple articles that come across my view, regarding research which those working on it don't understand, or are taking in a direction that doesn't lead to the truth. And all these people are studying things for which they've already made themselves ineligible to solve, by starting out by insisting on determinations which falsify the path of considering towards their truths."



iii.

Sociopathism is endemic throughout science, because science itself is the practice of making determinations based upon observation, and therefore is methodical sociopathism, and enables and nurtures sociopathism in whomever practices it.

But a worse instance of this polarity towards evil exists in partisan and ideological politics, and the event horizon which pulls consideration towards evil is what is responsible for mob mentality, and extremist politics. Those who are susceptible to this magnetism towards evil will deny any guilt or wrongfulness all the while that they move ever closer to their evil destination, as they have aligned their consideration away from the truth, and can no longer see the truth to see how what they do measures against the truth.

Considering experiences no gap visible in the physical world, and it can pull a whole people together into a place of evil, while, if those who are pulled by it exist beneath the Reason for the pulling, they will not be able to recognize the movement in any of their observation. If a people's awareness exists is a static pocket of consideration which by their will they determine to be True, then they can appear to themselves to be morally righteous - but in the sight of the full truth, they are an abomination.

Related post: A Greater Reasoning



iv.

The truth Is, and need only be considered. But a person who is reward-oriented has falsified their mind and their ability to consider the truth, because when they engage considering, their circuit of considering is already pointed towards reward, self, and falsehood. What then will it take for them to overcome the weight of all their falsely-aligned consideration?

With God, all things are possible, and for them who believe, all things are possible. Except to a person who has relinquished all control over themselves, belief is a power and a tool, which is a 'this is' declaration, which Reason enacts upon, to permeate existing consideration as the belief considers through the existing consideration, bringing positive consideration value if the belief is good, and causing the whole consideration structure to rise. This is why Jesus said "To what should I compare the kingdom of God? It is like yeast that a woman took and mixed with three measures of flour until all the dough had risen."



Don't be misled by the appearance of progress through scientific endeavors. That progress has not come from those who have faith in science, but from select individuals throughout this world's history who were more considering of truth than others, who discovered rulesets, made of particular truthful ordering of considerations, not by any observation or scientific process, but by considering, free of determinations. The people who discovered these things then gave their tiny examples of considered truth to the public, who then have been able to move forward so long as these rulesets are followed. But each determination based upon observation introduces falsehood into an environment of considerations. This is why Jesus said "Do not judge according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgement", which is the judgement that comes from having fully considered all things.

But there exists far greater than these currently understood rulesets, which do not allow a person to see or use them unless the person first enters into and become a part of them. There is no observation in the truth.

Shrapnel

Article: Mental illness mostly caused by life events not genetics, argue psychologists

Article: Mental illness mostly caused by life events not genetics, argue psychologists


To be specific, there are two root causes of mental illness: socipathism, which is the lack of consideration of the truth, and mental stress, which is the lack of released dopamine to handle the workload of considering that a brain is trying to do. And so the mental illness indicated by that above linked-to article is caused by the impact that life events have on a person's dopamine availability. With sufficient dopamine availability, a person will be able to rise above every challenging event.

That overcoming is a brain considering the meaning of every consideration which is a part of the event which a person encountered. And having greater dopamine availability won't change the amount of work which is to be done, but will make every workload weigh less and be handled with greater ease, and in less discomfort.

And genes are outputs of considering, which is the work of a brain that requires dopamine to do, and which suffers when a brain hasn't enough dopamine availability to perform it - and that suffering is then expressed in all the outputs of the processes which had to work without sufficient dopamine. And it is the false doctrines of reward-seeking sociopaths that has created the influences in society which are to blame for the continued existence and prevalence of mental health issues.



It's incredible that however many people (scientists, doctors, psychologists, etc...) have spent 100 years accomplishing absolutely nothing but an endless wild-goose chase of their own preferred determining.

A bunch of dopamine-plentiful people determined that it was better that any number of dopamine deficient people be tortured their whole lives, in pain, unhappiness and despair, conceding experience and opportunity, endlessly enduring agonizing stress and anxiety... all of it just because the dopamine-plentiful people found it preferential to their own comfort and position in society. Those people have been no different than slave owners whose entire fortunes were built on the backs of exploitation of others, and who would not give up their slaves, but would forcefully argue against the abolition of slavery - and they are still doing it.

Keeping dopamine deficiency states in society lets doctors and their ilk pretend that they're deserving of their reputation, their incomes, their self-determined "rewards"... but none of it is true. They are the most dishonourable of people, and their whole state in life has been built upon a lie, fraud, the undetected genocide of innocents and the most vulnerable. Everything that any doctor has ever judged a drug user of being all applies to doctors, themselves: They are in denial of reality, they harm others in pursuit of their goal, their ideology is selfish and only serving of them, they steal from people (their very lives), they cheat people (of their very mind, good health, and again lives)... they are acting out a sociopathic fantasy, and like bumbling idiots pretending that they are anything at all representing good.



This is what a doctor really is the custodian of:
Nixon official: real reason for the drug war was to criminalize black people and hippies

All modern institutional approach to drugs and health treatment is rooted in false and contrived drug propaganda, and is, itself, propaganda. And when governments, whose prerogative has been to use scare tactics to keep people away from looking at criminalized substances objectively, controls drug research licensing, and when pharmaceutical companies, who make their profit from inferior medications, fund the drug research that's available while also lobbying governments, and when a doctor’s greatest qualification for their job is precisely that they have no experience but are dopamine-rich due to being little-considering, what do you think that the expectable outcome from drug research and application will be?

The lie has been too sweet for doctors to pass up. They tell themselves that they deserve the things which that lie promised them, having jumped through the hoops of medical school, having not engaged in all the things they made harsh and harmful judgements against others for doing... they tell themselves that their placement in the lie is their "reward" - and they seek that reward more than they seek to do good for others. That reward, by their own labelling, is a release of dopamine within their brains. And so, in the end, they've been nothing but crack addicts, leeching off society and doing it harm for the purpose of trying to instil as much sense of that "reward" inside of themselves as they can. And their determinations in pursuit of this shut shuts down their considering, leading there to be much dopamine to fuel their depravity. And their depravity is that they have turned a falsehood into trillion-dollar industries, and that their whole livelihoods are built upon the liquidation of the lives of others, under pretence of helping them.

As Jesus said, no person can serve two masters: Either they will love one and hate the other, or vice versa. This is the same as what I said: For all things there is an ordering of considerations. And the final consideration will flip the polarity of all those that came before it and did not acknowledge it. A person who is reward-oriented is not truth-oriented, and a person who serves their own reward will hate the truth, because the truth says that their self-determined reward doesn't exist in the truth: There is no reward for the truth - the truth is, and there is no other. And Reason will flip the polarity of the entire world so that the truth may present in it once again.

Shrapnel

There is No Such Thing as Too Much Dopamine as an Ailment

i.

Serving as an example of another perfect inaccuracy in medical attribution, there exist recommendations of lowering dopamine to deal with certain behavioural issues, such as impulsive behaviour, including addiction - neither of which are caused by having too much dopamine, but by the connectivity of a brain having considered in a manner, or been collapsed into a manner, which guides behaviour down such avenues. The high dopamine is caused by the low consideration - and not the impulsiveness (which is a product of low consideration) caused by high dopamine.

Diverting attention from the actual root causes of those behaviours, which is the consideration that guides them, to dopamine, has deadly repercussions for millions of people around the world, and creates an atmosphere of ignorance that prevents truthful physiological understanding arising so that and real and positive resolutions can be had.

ii.

Considering is the work of a brain that requires dopamine, and which forms the connections in a brain that guide a person's behaviour - and well-considered connectivity is what normalizes a brain.

A person who has reduced normalization in their brain by making determinations can be vulnerable to impulsive tendencies, and may also have a surplus of dopamine availability from reducing the amount of work their brain is doing. The issue there isn't too much dopamine, but a lack of connection-forming consideration to make use of the dopamine that's available - and this state is called being a sociopath / psychopath.

When a person has impulsive tendencies (which can occur where there is dopamine deficiency as well), the sickness is not the dopamine that is available, but the manner in which the person has considered their mind. Dopamine doesn't make a person impulsive anyway - it is what gives a person all their control over their mind, and their potential for the mental work that is considering. And what they consider will develop the pathway that will guide their behaviours.

It is not justified, or appropriate to blame dopamine availability for particular people's behaviour, and then restrict everyone's access to dopamine so that hundreds of millions of mental stress sufferers are tortured and exploited, just so that sociopaths and psychopaths do not need to admit to and confront their personal flaws and selfishness.

As it is, the people with the problems inside of themselves are the ones designating institutional ailments and treatments. They're saying that any number of innocent people need to suffer and be denied their deserved cure, so that they can continue being well-comforted while playing out a facade.

In an act of ultimate irresponsibility, they are imposing the penalty of their own guilt onto people who have done nothing wrong. And they profit heavily as the main benefactors from the torture it causes those people, both financially, and in ill-gained reputations within society as carers of people - whose problems they are the cause of, as well as obstructions to the needed cure, as if profiteering off the suffering of others is the sociopath's reward for ensuring that the suffering persists.

Now that I have elucidated the matter and corrected the attribution of fault in an impulsive person from dopamine to a lack of sound consideration, there is no longer justification for withholding the proper treatment from those who need it. Sociopaths need to learn to consider, and people with mental stress need powerful dopamine increases.

iii.

If a person has impulsive tendencies, then it isn't directly because of dopamine in any way. Though if a person has allowed pathways to consider which cause impulsiveness, having dopamine available will have a role in helping enable those pathways to be engaged. But having dopamine available is also what will enable it to be corrected by considering - a person cannot make one change in their brain, for good or bad, apart from having available dopamine.

Addressing an issue by clamping down dopamine is only masking the problem, and is not addressing it at its root. And thinking of dopamine reduction as a tool to avoid the problem has very harmful, including deadly consequences for millions of people who require increased dopamine to be healthy and in control of their lives.

Decreasing dopamine is not a solution to anything, and is running away from personal responsibility. And it is only even conjectured to be a solution because those who suggest it are only personally familiar with having a consistent high level of dopamine, and with no alternate experience to contrast their own with, they are left egregiously unfamiliar with dopamine's actual effect and importance - and this makes the things that they propose and impose on other people based in ignorance and hypocrisy.

A person who is familiar with dopamine is not going to choose to lower it to address any specific problem, because lowering it will reduce the capability and quality of a great many things. Lowering dopamine only stands a chance to reduce impulsive behaviour by reducing work potential of a brain enough so that there's no extra capability to engage considerations further than basic awareness. Awareness itself will be decreased, as will positive experience of senses, critical thinking capability, creative expression, visual depth perception, aural articulation, energy, and more.

Lowering dopamine lowers a person's capability to experience, perceive, and engage life, and lowering dopamine to address a particular behavioural problem would be like a person responding to having a messy home by having their sight, smell, and touch disabled so that they don't encounter their messy home's unpleasantness, rather that tending to the mess by cleaning it up.

Lowering dopamine is avoiding a problem, rather than dealing with it, and it is a selfish approach because it also encourages the continued victimization of many people who are being denied the dopamine they fundamentally require to be healthy, and to experience and enjoy life.

Shrapnel

Adendum - Migraines are Dopamine Deficiency - and also: The Importance of Tact in Dopaminergic Application - and also: The Importance of Considering the Truth

Related post: Just a Tip (Regarding news of genetic mutations being responsible for such or such a condition)


i.

Oh, and it should go without saying, but migraines are also a product of there being insufficient dopamine for a brain to handle work that is processing through it, and, yes, sufficiently increasing dopamine availability relative to other things will alleviate a migraine - but try to not also increase adrenaline and noradrenaline at the same time, because that would be counter-productive, and could exacerbate part of the migraine.

To do this is to treat the dopamine deficiency symptom at its root and source. To do anything other is to either be in denial of one's real problem, or to be self-spiting of one's own human being.

The pain of a migraine is a part of a brain's voice, and it is crying in anguish precisely for dopamine, which it essentially needs. Does a person ignore a baby that is screaming in pain if there is some anomaly afflicting it? Why would they act so inhumanely towards their very own brain, leaving it in a state of torture while it tries to do good work for the person? Such is an ultimate irresponsibleness and self-spitefulness. A person who cannot come to grips with the state of being a human is not worthy of being one, and is a danger to themselves, and a harmful influence within society.



ii.

But in all dopaminergic application, tact is all-mattering. Robin Williams, someone who endured various dopamine deficiency ailments, and took cocaine, and yet in the end wasn't helped by it, would be a text-book example of how not to pursue dopaminergism, if the knowledge to develop an understanding of these things to be put into a book had been pursued by any in the previous century, instead of engaging the quintessential sociopathic conduct of insisting sentiment-base determinations to people, to lying to people about the nature of dopamine and dopaminergics and building walls of propaganda and indoctrinating doctors using institutional falsehoods to turn them into agents of fallacy.

Robin Williams could have straight-forwardly been cured of his Parkinson's, anxiety, and depression using cocaine. He, too, was a victim of institutional misinformation on drugs, and of those who perpetuate that misinformation.

One of the most essential things to avoid in dopaminergic application is any sense that it is wrong to take these drugs, however a person feels they would like to take them. Regardless of whether a person harbours insecurities about increasing their dopamine, their brain still fundamentally depends on, and operates on dopamine. When a person is insecure about taking cocaine, or other dopaminergic, which is only from a century of false messaging by doctors, scientists, and government, that uncertainty and worry is a belief held by consideration, which is represented as synaptic connections within their brain.

Considerations have polarity, and receive their identity as relative to one another. And such a belief aligns certain considerations in a negative manner, and for as long as it evaluates as True towards the activity a person is engaging in, all signals relating to that activity will pass through that consideration, and receive an antagonistic influence, a quantum of negative consideration-value, which can infect the whole mind. And increasing adrenaline and noradrenaline will accelerate the considering of those things that are worries, and progressively amplify the presence of negative consideration-value in the brain until a time when things settle down and they can be reconsidered into normalcy. This is where drug-induced anxiety and psychosis come from - there is nothing inherent in the drugs taken themselves that cause these things, but it is a contagion created by doctors, scientists, and government, out of their sociopathic inclinations to attempt to justify their own statuses by demeaning and harming those of others, who they deem as targets for their prejudice.



iii.

All anti-drug propaganda bears a negative consideration-value within society, and the accrued negative consideration-value in society because of the previous century of anti-drug propaganda is tremendous, and it has killed many people, and has destroyed many families.

Despite its awful influence in society, every human being's brain and body still fundamentally runs on the things people have been taught to be scared by - and much unfortunate drug behaviour is no different than a you girl who is abused by their parents, being told she's a worthless slut who won't amount to anything, growing up to become a promiscuous and alcoholic vagrant (though these individual activities, if done within their control and awareness, and by their own choosing, would not be wrong). Such a person is not a statement against the harms of the alcohol or drugs they may use, but delivers an indictment against those who delivered to her the hateful messaging which considered through her, shaping the neurological pathways that guide her behaviour.

It is the same with negative drug usage patterns in society - none of them were caused by drugs, themselves, but were created by scientists, doctors, and governments, who then profit from their existence, and use them as false-justification to further the messaging that created them in the first place.

In the end, the Truth itself will require there to be full justice for those who were unfairly subjected to and manipulated by anti-drug propaganda, and who received mistreatment at the hands of those those who peddled that propaganda.



iv.

Also, ironically, when anti-drug propaganda is being administered to a society, there is a growth in sociopathism within that society, and a reduction in intelligence within that society, and the harms put into children and teenagers are those very ones which anti-drug propaganda would have them think come from drugs: Considering is the mechanism behind evolution, and a brain develops its connections through the course of considering. Those connections themselves represent the considerations of a person's mind, and greater Truth is manifest the more considerations are accounted for within an environment - and considerations which resolve into one form concepts. A determination is like a road-block that prevents considering from occurring - and the more determinations held in a mind, the less presence of truth there is in that mind, and the more selfish and sociopathic it is likely to be.

Anti-drug propaganda is not based in truth, but in sentiment-based determinations, disseminated and practised by truth-lacking sociopaths - and its influence is killing of the mind of society, and creating of all kinds of diseases. Conversely, taking many of the drugs anti-drug propaganda frightens people away from commonly greatly improves a healthy development of mind, and fortifies both physical and mental health.

So when anti-drug propaganda told people "this is your brain on drugs", that imagery and message was, in truth, what was being done to the brain of every person who believed that message. While the drugs they were being warned against did and do the opposite - they provide a person with the physio-fuel that makes them healthier, smarter, and more capable for good (though to use it is a person's choice). As I've said, a determination is a falsehood by nature, which reduces consideration (a consideration being a quantum of truth, and a quantum of mind), and which aligns a person's considerations antithetically to the truth.

Doctors and scientist and governments have brain-washed people into being scared of the very thing that cures them - and so they are made to suffer all kinds of artificially-created ailments. But in the end, just as in the beginning, the human brain effectively runs on the effect of cocaine, which is actually literally good by nature. And if a person is encountering an issue within themselves, particularly within their mind, the effect of cocaine would be a reliably good place to start addressing it, as a first recourse. It is good, normal, and healthy for a person to use drugs which they recognize by their own judgement as contributing positively inside of themselves - and no one on the outside is capable of casting a judgement over that.

The Truth is real, and cannot be determined, but can only come to be known by being considered.


Continued in this post: Regarding Cocaine's Applicability for Treating Migraines (2nd Addendum)

Shrapnel

Just a Tip (Regarding news of genetic mutations being responsible for such or such a condition)

You can view this type of news all over the place, and regarding a host of different ailments and conditions:

Genetic mutation 'is responsible for BOTH migraines and IBS'

Genes are an output of considering, and the work that is considering requires dopamine. If something is going wrong in the development and maintenance of a gene, then there was likely an insufficient availability of dopamine to provide the pathways that were relevant to that gene's creation with enough dopamine.

Further, conditions such as anxiety, depression, psychosis, etc, in all their details, are ultimately merely symptoms and expressions of dopamine deficiency.

Modern medicine has taken a falsehood regarding dopamine, that of it being "reward", rather than physio-fuel, and turned it into trillion-dollar industries, as well as a container for their prejudice. Those complicit in this are mass murderers, and those administering this charade and farce, such as doctors, who uphold the forced obsolescence of people, are no different than nazi guards who held posts at death camps during WW2, who, too, believed they were enforcing a righteous paradigm, and were just doing their job and what they were trained for.

When looking at events in history like the Crusades, people often use that as a notation of how many religion has killed. Well, by the same measure, looking at those who have been killed by decades upon decades of corroborated institutional medical science, through defamation of dopamine, it is true to say that those killed by their science in the previous century number in the hundreds of millions, and those victimized by science number in the billions - and therefore more people have been killed in the name of science than in that of any other dogma.

Humans have not yet achieved a more efficient tool of death, suffering, and inequality than the mischaracterizing of dopamine and dopaminergics. And those delivering these false representations are the most proficient of mass murderers in history.



This post is part of a series:

1. Just a Tip (Regarding news of genetic mutations being responsible for such or such a condition)
2.  Adendum - Migraines are Dopamine Deficiency - and also: The Importance of Tact in Dopaminergic Application - and also: The Importance of Considering the Truth
3. Regarding Cocaine's Applicability for Treating Migraines (2nd Addendum)

Shrapnel

Articles: Poverty may alter the wiring of kids’ brains / Children from wealthy families grow up as extroverts, earn more in life

Article: Poverty may alter the wiring of kids’ brains

This is something that I've written about on this blog before, and I've said that the greatest harm done by poverty is the impact it has on a person's dopamine availability, which all development is conditional to.

The added stress in the lives of poor people creates more tasks for their brains, which drags on their dopamine availability, as dopamine is required to make choices, and worries involve lots of perpetual choice-making while a person tries to keep themselves afloat. This drag on a person's dopamine availability is what leads to depression and many other disorders, such as psychosis and anxiety.

Dopamine is what gives a brain its work potential, and when a brain's dopamine availability becomes impoverished, that gets reflected in its development. And poverty's greatest harm is the impact that it has on a person's dopamine availability, with low dopamine leading to all sorts of negative health developments.

Mental stress is literally a lack of available dopamine within a brain, meaning that a brain is trying to do more work than it has the dopamine to properly handle. Boosting dopamine conversely creates the opposite situation as that of a stressed brain, which is why "smart drugs" like modafinil, and other powerful dopaminergics like cocaine very effectively increase a person's cognition, control and accuracy of thought, and their overall working smarts.


Mice Fed with Cocaine Show Growth in Brain Areas Linked with Learning, Memory
Cocaine enhances memory storage in mice
Cocaine self-administration improves performance in a highly demanding water maze task.
Dopamine impacts your willingness to work
Cocaine study that got up the nose of the US
1995 World Health Organization cocaine report

Now, in the reverse situation, where worries aren't challenging a brain's dopamine budget, the opposite outcome occurs.

Article: Children from wealthy families grow up as extroverts, earn more in life

Dopamine's influence is simply like a dial that increases all a person's mental capacities when it is increased, and conversely diminishes all a person's mental capacities when decreased. A person's physical capacities are dependent upon their mental capacities, so these decrease as well with lower dopamine, and increase with higher dopamine.

Dopamine, effectively, is everything to human health, happiness, success, enjoyable experience, control. Because all these things are the expression of signals being able to be assemble, and considerations working with each other - and dopamine is the mechanism that lets any information assemble within a brain, and enables a person to make a choice. Without dopamine, a person can't know, and can't even know what it is they want to know. The human brain is wholly dependent upon having enough dopamine, and without dopamine, a person's positive brain activity stalls, and the person's life is left stagnant or in state of total dependency on things outside of themselves. But with dopamine, everything works.



Back to the second linked-to article, the less available dopamine a person has, the fewer and smaller the considerations they are able to work with at one time without becoming overwhelmed, panicked, stressed, exhausted, etc. The nature of being extroverted is the product of having the dopamine availability to power the sight of mind to see how things come together, to act and navigate comfortably within one's environment.

Also, memory formation and recollection is automatic when there is ample dopamine to handle the considering of experiences, which is what forms memory, and as experiences consider, they become a part of the structure of the brain.

People who grow up in non stressful households, to go on to have a good education and get a good-paying job, often attribute their success to their discipline, their good upbringing, their subscribing the right set of determinations. But as studies show, often the people who are the most functional and who achieve the most success are also the most psychopathic in society - which means they have fewer considerations, which is represented as less connectivity within their brains, which means that these who are among the most successful in society are also actually those who have worked the least, and made the least effort in society - but have constantly been rewarded for it by societal systems that are based on sociopathic determinations.

As I've said, a person's dopamine availability is a far greater determiner for a person's success in life than effort - and that effort only increases as a person's dopamine availability becomes limited.



The lower stress environments that some people grow up in often lead them to mis-attribute their success, and others' failures or states of suffering, to all sorts of determinations they've made themselves, or have been taught. But the reality of it all is that it is only because of how much work each others brain are trying to do, and what impact it has on their dopamine availability.

A determination, while made to form a conclusion that can serve as reason for things, is simultaneously a command to not consider the things regarding which the determination was made. And making determinations puts up many walls in a person's mind and brain. And these walls of 'do not consider' prevent the greater development of a brain.

The determinations a dopamine-rich person makes to rationalize why they succeed and others don't (often made in prejudice against those who haven't succeeded) actually lowers the amount of considering within their brain, and considering is the work that requires dopamine. Therefore, this results in there being more dopamine availability within the brain of a person who shuts down considering by making determinations, and who isn't willing to consider beyond their determinations - but at the same time, their determinations results in them not developing the connections and consideration which results from considering. So they consequently, for all their determinations, strong functionality, and memorized facts, are not particularly insightful, smart, or useful to the truth. But they feel extremely self-assured by their observable successes.



What has happened with society is that, in a tower made up of layers, where each higher layer represents people of a greater complexity of consideration development, smarts, ingenuity, and positive potential, the highest 1/3rd or greater layers have been removed from the top, and placed at the bottom of that tower, because of the determinations and dopamine policies of modern society. The smart people don't even know that they're amazingly smart, because their awareness isn't there due to their dopamine impoverishment as a result of them trying to consider as if true everything in environments built to reward sociopaths for being sociopathic.

I've questioned before how a truthfully considering person could possibly succeed scholastically, when the information presented is simply constructs of static determinations, which don't add up. If a person succeeds in school, even though they're smart by contemporary barometers, they're probably not too smart. Scholastic success is simply the result of having dopamine for fact memorization, which having is regularly the result of being a less considering person.



The lower a person's dopamine availability, the greater effort it takes to do everything. Many successful people, even though they think they've worked hard according to their known experience, are putting out less effort in a week, or month, or year, than many people with low dopamine availability are putting out in a day. And yet society hasn't clued in to the reality that everyone is not working at an equal level, all because of what dopamine is.

So clearly, dopamine cannot be reward, because dopamine comes before all reward, and is enabler for the work that might lead to benefit. As I've long been saying, dopamine is mental task processing fuel, and the means by which the brain accomplishes all work - and without dopamine, work is not possible for a brain, leading to all kinds of suffering, ailment, death, and dependencies.



In the case of doctors, we have people who are of very high dopamine availability, combined with very low considering, very little experience, and a predisposition to making judgements about people of dispositions and experiences that they do not even know or believe exist, based on their ignorant and sociopathic observation. And the result is an ignorance and prejudice-driven industry, which is literally completely unnecessarily liquidating the most dopamine impoverished people, turning them into soylent green, where the soylent green is money.

And, consequently, the people who are doing this are responsible for the states they perpetually treat people for, because their doctrine and prejudices are the barriers that has ensured that the truth of mental stress and its ailments doesn't get addressed.



Because cocaine is the healthier-than-natural release of dopamine within a person's brain, and because increasing dopamine via medication normally has the non-beneficial and stress-worsening consequence of increasing adrenaline, and because all the brain's work is accomplished by having dopamine availability, human are effectively cocaine-based beings - meaning that the human brain runs on, and produces all its health and positive accomplishment by the very effect of cocaine. And when a person has a mental stress ailment, such as depression, anxiety, psychosis, PTSD, bi-polar, autism, schizophrenia, and more... that ailment is directly the outcome and expression of that person, or their parents, having not taken care of their brain and body's own natural cocaine needs.

All of these things are preventable, and addressable. But those practising institutional medicine need to let go of their persistent denial and to stop running away from the truth. They need to stop putting their ideology ahead of truth and people's lives, and be willing to face reality and address the root cause of mental stress and its ailments. And by doing so they will finally be able to stop harming the societies that they live in, and to stop being the real obstacles to genuine health and health treatment in this world.



By this knowledge, Mental Stress, and all its emergent ailments, become choices - both for the individual, and for society.

Shrapnel