Addendum to the Previous Post about Parkinson's Receptibility to Dopamine, and also Something of Psycheparous

Related post: Article: Asthma drugs may reduce Parkinson’s risk (yet another lap around the same track)


I've explained this before, and it deserves representation wherever talking about dopamine treatment for an ailment like Parkinson's, where the contemporary medical practitioner's presumption is that dopamine treatment of the ailment works at first, but eventually loses its effectiveness.



i.

With most all dopaminergics, when a person takes them, they're increasing both dopamine-availability, and adrenergic influence in their brain.

The more that dopamine is increased, the easier it is for a brain to connect information across synapses, to sync considering processes, and to process work to its conclusion and free up that pipeline space within a brain. However, as adrenergic influence is increased, the faster the brain tries to work, and the more dopamine is required to handle the increased workload of the brain. So, increasing adrenergic influence alongside dopamine is applying antithetical influences, and does a lot to undermine the goal of attending to states that are in need of an increase of dopamine, such as the dopamine deficiency ailment of Parkinson's.

When people taking dopaminergic drugs like meth get wired out, twitchy, and agitated, that's because of the adrenergic influence on the brain's processes over time outpacing the more temporary sought dopamine boost that those drugs give. The influence of the dopamine increase is immediate, and positive, but the influence on processes from the adrenergic increases is more inlaid, compiling over time, and lasting after the dopaminergic influence and benefit has worn off.

When taking dopaminergic Parkinson's medication, it initially helps because it is increasing dopamine, and that's always giving a positive work capacity boost to the brain, which immediately alleviates away as much of the top-layer negative impacts of the ailment as there is supplemented dopamine to address. But, at the same time, the brain is also being fed an increase in adrenergic influence, which will be feeding the source of the ailment all the while in the background.

So, over time, dopaminergics become less effective, not because dopamine stopped being what the brain needs, but because the adrenergic influence that was simultaneously being administered as a consequential component to the dopaminergic influence has contributed towards accelerating the ailment to the point that the dopamine aspect of the medication is no longer a significant influence against the ailment.

There aren't many dopaminergics that do much to inhibit adrenergic influence, but cocaine is one of them, and is what makes it such an effective treatment for mental stress ailments. I would say that if cocaine was used, rather than the various medicines that are currently used to treat Parkinson's, that there wouldn't be witnessed the same eventual ineffectiveness of the dopamine treatment as the ailment overcame its reach. And if used with understanding of Psycheparous to manage the movement of signals in a person's brain, then a full cure is in reach of anybody.

Keep in mind that what I've said would only apply to pure cocaine, as the things that street cocaine is cut with frequently add negative adrenergic influence of their own.



ii.

Conventional medicine is mired in an identity crisis, where it can't make up its mind whether it wishes to be good, or to be evil; whether it wants to cure people, or accomplish its ideology. When treating an ailment with part cure, part poison, then there isn't a full will present to cure that ailment, and the practitioner's interests are divided, and they end up failing to do good.



If asking a doctor: Do you want to cure this person, or not?

They might say: Yes, I want to cure that person.

And if it is then said to them: OK, so do what will cure that person.

Then their mind detaches itself from the context of the discussion, and they default into a programmed ideological determination of: We don't want to give people things that encourage non-medical substance use.

Which means that their honest answer to the question of 'Do you want to cure this person whose ailment is cause by lack of this specific thing, relative to the influence of these other things?' is: No, I do not want to cure that person - because the word 'cure' in that context is a stand-in which represents doing the very thing that is the person's cure. It's like a pointer, that references a container in which is held the considerations that fulfill the meaning of Cure for that particular person's situation.

Just as Jesus said 'you cannot serve mammon and God,' it is also true that a person cannot simultaneously serve ideology and still do what is good. An ideology is something that a person determines and sets up to replace the truth as their guide.



iii.

Just as considerations are polar, the signals that are considering through a person's brain present a workload for that brain. That workload carries a value to it, and dopamine-availability also presents a value of work potential. When there isn't enough dopamine to address presented workloads, it is possible for the workloads to do damage to that brain, as those signals are being pulled through the brain by Reason with force. Things can break, splintering one process into many that each need the same value of dopamine as the former one process did. Also, considering can collapse, and call fall into failure, including a failure that keeps considering over and over as a negative loop. And considerings that collapse into each other can form a black hole-like force, made by their compounding polarities all directing towards a point that draws in other consideration... and this is how granfalloons become created, as considerations are pulled out of the truthful context that gives them their meaning.

However, likewise, when a mind is filled positive truthful belief, the considering of that mind lifts it up with great strength into ever-greater truth, being the example of 'to whoever has, more will be given.' And many things will continually be resolved in that person, with them progressively filling up with light as they do so. Such considering represents the 'streams of living water' that Jesus spoke of, which he said become a 'spring of water welling up to eternal life.' As I've said, life is the movement created by considering, and considering is the movement created by considerations being considered by and flowing through other considerations.

Shrapnel

Article: Asthma drugs may reduce Parkinson’s risk (yet another lap around the same track)

Article: Asthma drugs may reduce Parkinson’s risk



i.

This isn't a mystery, and it shares the same explanation as a great multitude of other ailment-medication responses: Clenbuterol increases dopamine, and dopamine is the human brain's work fuel, and is what it uses to connect information across synapses. Any time dopamine is being increased, a brain's work capacity is being increased, and any time dopamine is reduced, a brain's capacity for work is reduced and stress is increased. Mental stress is merely a lack of dopamine availability within a brain relative to the amount of work a brain is trying to do, and is comparable to dehydration being a lack of water, and asphyxiation being a lack of oxygen.

Depression, anxiety, psychosis, ADHD, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, schizophrenia... they all emerge from the state of stress that is dopamine deficiency, and they can all be effectively treated, even cured, by increasing dopamine while inhibiting adrenergic influence. The interrupted fetus development that is autism is again a case of insufficient dopamine availability within a pregnant mother, and autistic child-births can also be prevented by ensuring dopamine levels are high enough relative to other things in a pregnant mother.

Relatedly, what is called the placebo effect is positive belief reducing the micro states of uncertainty and worrying (those things causing considering in a brain, which is the work of a brain for which dopamine is required), which reduces the work in a brain, which frees up dopamine availability for a brain, which consequently leads to improved health.

Most dopaminergics have an unfavourable adrenergic influence alongside their positive dopaminergic influence, and increasing adrenergic influence worsens stress states. However, cocaine is one dopaminergic which does inhibit adrenergic response, and is excellent at inhibiting adrenergic response while greatly increasing dopamine availability within a brain.

In fact, when applied with understanding, it is possible to flush a severe and long-existing psychosis from a person in just a mere couple of hours, or less, using pure cocaine.



ii.

And don't forget Schizophrenia:

Exhibit A) Study Suggests Genetics Could Be The Root Cause Of Schizophrenia

"The findings may help explain the longstanding mystery of why brains from people with schizophrenia tend to have a thinner cerebral cortex with fewer synapses than unaffected individuals do," said a press statement from the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, whose experts took part in the study.

This is the brain's outer layer, often referred to as grey matter, involved in learning and memory."


Exhibit B) Mice Fed with Cocaine Show Growth in Brain Areas Linked with Learning, Memory

Looks like we have a match!


It's also the same reason why Methylene Blue helps against Alzheimer's, why coffee does the same and can help a person to live longer, why Modafinil is a "smart drug", why teenagers who lack what fuels a person's working memory capabilities end up using dopaminergic drugs while simplifying life helps prevent future mental illness, why poverty has the effect on people that it does, and why a million other dopaminergics help against a million dopamine-deficiency ailments:

An Eclectic Assortment of Articles, Which All Receive Resolution by Understanding Dopamine

A Few More for: An Eclectic Assortment of Articles...

The Third Entry Into "An Eclectic Assortment of Articles, Which All Receive Resolution by Understanding Dopamine"


It's all one thing - same cause, same solution.



iii.

Dopamine is only "reward" to a sociopath, who, because of their low consideration, associates the increased dopamine availability they experience from doing the types of things which they have determined to indicate that they are good little dogs as being a confirmation of their good little dogginess. This understanding is an inversion of the truth. What's actually happening is the same thing as happens with placebo:

"positive belief reducing the micro states of uncertainty and worrying (those things causing considering in a brain, which is the work of a brain for which dopamine is required), which reduces the work in a brain, which frees up dopamine availability for a brain, which consequently leads to improved health, cognitive strength, and positive feeling."


To someone that isn't a sociopath, dopamine is not "reward," or something that comes in the end, but physio-fuel, and what is required to be there in the beginning for proper and intended functionality, and for proficient and healthy development. To human physiology, it is the god-molecule.


Conventional medicine is firstly about ideology and profit, and not truth. The truth is that an enormous host of illnesses, particularly mental illnesses, all only emerge and branch from mental stress, which itself is simply a lack of dopamine availability in a brain relative to the amount of work that brain is trying to accomplish.

And much research that is done concerning related topics is primarily about the researcher seeking to experience peer-approved "reward" for conforming to and supporting a dogmatic ideology.


To sum the situation up from one angle: Institutional and academic medical doctrine is fake. It is the 21st century's equivalent of practising the four humours, and would only be more so if the four humours was a patented practice that earned its patent-holders money every time it was practised.



iv.

because it strips them of all the determinations they've used as justification for


Why do today's scientists revel in historical stories such as Galileo facing off against an institution of dogmatic ideologues who had all the evidence they were willing to consider to prove that Earth is the centre of the universe, when today's scientists are the same as the people Galileo faced off against?

And this is a pattern that has occurred throughout history: An individual person considers beyond conventions because of the greater belief they have within themselves, and by their consideration discovers new marvels that they then make known to everybody.

But all those who move by determinations oppose the greater consideration presented, because what is presented strips those people of all the determinations they've made to justify themselves, invalidating their prejudiced judgments, their perceptions of their statuses, their reputations as knowledgeable authorities...

In time, however, the greater truth become reinforced as indisputable, and then those whose truth is their determinations begin to make determinations about everything surrounding the new thing and begin turn it into an ideology, an institution, and a dogma. Then, sociopaths from all over flock to that thing and conform to it, not because they understand and know it, but because the appearance of consensus is what they take as truth. And they reinforce that thing with all kinds of extraneous infrastructures, and wave that thing all around as their "proof" of many other things, including why they're smarter than the dogmatic ideologues of history who did the same thing as they are doing - because now they have the right determination to conform to and invest their sentiments into.

But the truth is not a determination.



Related post: Addendum to the Previous Post about Parkinson's Receptibility to Dopamine, And Also Something of Psycheparous

Shrapnel

Considering Reality, Perception of Time, and Spiritual Growth

Reality is a reasoning of considerations, and all considerations fully reasoned add up to one.

People calling themselves scientists, or physicists theorize of multiple universes, or different dimension, but there is one truth, made of all considerations, and a person exists in as much of it as they have been willing to reason as good within themselves, and perceived multiple dimensions can be merged into one by reasoning their considerations into one reality. And since what is perceived as physical is a manifestation of what is reasoned in consideration, what are called 'laws of physics' are changed, removed, or added to an experienced reality based on whether the consideration that makes up that reality increases, diminishes.


As I said in a previous post:

"If there was full separation between any considerations (such as a person, a mind, a thought, a cell) and other consideration, the two wouldn't be observable within the same reality. The universe wouldn't experience the other, and the other wouldn't experience the universe. They would be two separate existences, not aware of each other and not able to experience each other - and so exerting no influence upon each other. They would pass right through each other without effect, and each would be to the other as if non-existent."

And:

"Reasoning is Mind placing all Considerations so that they are ordered rightly, and so producing Truth, and further, what is Good - which re-defines Truth in the Universe by re-allocating the placement of its Considerations. Once a Consideration is re-allocated by Reasoning, what existed previously no-longer exists, nor did it ever exist. Its other placement is no-more, and will not be again, and record of it cannot be found anywhere. It is as if it never was, and is of no-effect.

This happens in and beyond the universe all the time.

What sits beneath such a change will never know it when it happens, but what sits above it will know it."


Think of the example made in the movie Interstellar:






What experiences to the astronaut of little consideration as abstract and complex is understood by the greater mind that they are within as one reasoned concept, and all its contained considerations can be accessed at once, in any volume, without inhibition. And each experience of a moment in time that a person exists within is already this, while the more considerations a person reasons together, the greater their moment of experience expands to, and eventually, for 'the one who endures to the end', as Jesus described it, all considerations will be restored into one eternal moment in which everything exists in its truthful form.

The greater the distance in consideration, the more abstract understanding of other places become. And with great enough distance, it is as if nothing is there to be perceived by whoever doesn't have the consideration within themselves to be able to perceive those things.

And as Jesus described in a parable, "And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been set in place, so that those who want to go from here to you cannot, nor can anyone cross over from there to us." The divide is the absence of consideration to form a bridge between the two places.

Even in your own states, you are being considered through other places and people. When theorists speak of every possibility existing, yet speak as though they exist in different spaces from one another, they express the determinations and separation they have from those places. A person who reasons all considerations together can exist in all of those places at once, and have it experience as one place, with the unified sight, experience, understanding, and all other aspects, of all of them. And if that person makes determinations which separate themselves from considerations some of those things are made of, then they will lose awareness, experience, and presence in the places they have separated themselves from the considerations of. A person is filtered through all considerations based on how their own held considerations cause them to evaluate against the truth.



When a mind considers information, that incoming information evaluates pre-held considerations to achieve substantiation of new incoming information. Both the pre-held information and the incoming information can be reformed by reassembling the considerations it’s made of, to reason the entire volume of pre-held and incoming considerations into one body of consideration. This is the digesting of incoming information. When a determination is made, considerations are rejected, and there is a divide created between a person and those considerations.

And the state of being made of all the considerations which fully reason to add add up to one is what 'made in the image of God' refers to.

Sometimes a person is not able to consider a thing because their pre-held considerations are too much  aligned against it, or the incoming thing rules against the person's own considerations with too much force, and opening up to that thing all at once could destroy the body of considerations that is the person’s mind and experience. This is why Jesus said: "Besides, who would patch old clothing with new cloth? For the new patch would shrink and rip away from the old cloth, leaving an even bigger tear than before. And no one puts new wine into old wineskins. For the old skins would burst from the pressure, spilling the wine and ruining the skins. New wine is stored in new wineskins so that both are preserved.”

What is perceived as time is the movement of some considerations relative to others, at different speeds, and different directions. What is called time can be contracted and expanded by considering, and the considerations that make up the experience of a particular time can be added to, so that that space and what it contains becomes more. Also, by reasoning more considerations into one, the breadth of time while in that place is greater.

What is viewed as 'passing of time' is a person having been considered beyond the form of considerations that is the place that is considered as passed. If that form of considerations became fully considered as True again by a person, then that would again be where that person exists. But if a person is not fully reasoned together with all their considerations, then they don't possess full control to do things like this, since, for considerations that are defining their disposition towards a person's effort as negative against their determinations will naturally be inclined to deny or do the opposite to what a person's tries to impose, and that person will be ruled against by their own consideration, because they carried falsehood within themselves, which is a disjointment between considerations that causes one edict upon all considerations to translate into opposite meanings to many of them.



What is fully reasoned is in all times at once, and reason is the state of all-True, and is eternal.

Considerations evaluate as True or False against other consideration, so the more considerations that have been reasoned into one within a mind, the more that mind knows, and the more truth there is in that mind. And those considerations, or the meaning of their absence are everything that guides a person, so when a person’s considerations are reasoned into one, that person is truthful. But when a person’s considerations are disjointed and against each other because of that person’s determinations, then it is impossible for that person to be truthful, even when they adhere to all the principles they have made for themselves to justify their behaviour.



There are many causes why a person may or may not be able to consider something, or to get control of considering that is happening within them, and potentially harming them greatly. And the answer to every posed group of considerations is particular. Like Jesus said "Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God", which means not bread, not a 'this' or a 'that', but by every last consideration. Again, 'made in the image of God' means that the truthful image of a person is with all considerations - and any left out represent falsehood. And since life if the movement caused by considering, where there is an absence of consideration, there exists death.

A simple prescription would be a determination, saying 'these specific considerations' out of all consideration. But the truth is all considerations taken into account, and ordered in the only single way that they add up completely. But belief is what invokes Reason, to cause considering. And so the greater a person grows their belief, the more consideration they will be able to engage and hold in their view at once. The smaller a person's belief, the less consideration they are able to hold within themselves. Meditation and increasing dopamine both can help a person be able to calm and organize their consideration, to bring them closer in reason.

Shrapnel

Article: 'Study Relates High Intelligence Gene to Autism' + How Drug Prohibition (Rather Than Drugs) Attacks Mental Health

i.

Article: Yale study suggests genes associated with high intelligence also associated with autism


As I've said many times now:

Considering is the work of a brain, and is the work for which dopamine is required - to handle the association of information across synapses that are not yet perfectly reasoned together (once perfectly reasoned, there is no more disjointment between information, and no work for which dopamine is required - those fully-reasoned considerations are as one).

The more work a brain is trying to do (the more things it is considering, the more connections across synapses it is trying to make) the more dopamine it requires to properly perform that work, and to bring it to its resolution. Therefore, genes related to high intelligence indicate situations where there was required more dopamine to complete the work involved.

Gene development is an output of signal-routing in a human's brain. If there are issues with gene-development in a mother, then they hint at issues with the signal-routing by which their creation is directed - which hints at there being insufficient dopamine to handle a brain's workload.

If a mother already experiences issues with the signal-routing that develops her own genes, then, especially since pregnancy is straining on a mother's dopamine to begin with, it's expectable that there would be an expression of it in the development of her child - since its fetus development is woven by the same brain, using its dopamine-availability, and its signal-routing. And if the design template for a child is more complex, then the more dopamine there needs to be available in the mother's brain to properly fulfill its design.

Autism is caused by a mother having insufficient dopamine in her brain while pregnant to handle the signal-routing required for full development of the baby, resulting in interrupted development. Cocaine's effect is the significant increase of available dopamine in a person's brain, while inhibiting the stress-increasing uptake of norepinephrine by the heart, and so taking cocaine while pregnant can prevent autistic births, while also creating a more robust and thoroughly-developed body and brain for the born baby.

Autism is a direct expression of a pregnant mother's own insufficient dopamine-availability for the workload of creating her baby's body and brain.



ii.

What I've explained about belief (which is a 'This Is' command), invoking Reason, which causes considering, creating workload for a brain that doesn't cease and which requires dopamine to assemble information across synapses to either consider matters to their resolutions, or for falsification of the considering to be made by way of making a determination (a determination bein a falsehood by nature, saying 'these considerations, but not these others')... formulates the E=mc2 of mental health.

Mental distress exists in the world today because institutional medical doctrine, those who have created it, and those who have conformed to it (whose truth is conformity to the appearance of authority - often so that they can experience what they've disgracefully labelled their "reward", which is the dopamine they have prevented those in need of it from accessing) are in opposition to the truth of mental health, and are responsible for many people's continued and severe suffering.

Just as how oil companies produce paid-for false information in their "science" reports to keep threats to its business away, how car manufacturers falsify emissions tests to advertise and sell their cars, how the privatized and for-profit USA prison system invests in creating criminals to incarcerate, how weapons manufacturers invest in creating pretext for wars to create business for themselves, and how political parties are often creating negative propaganda against their opponents... well, the same is true of the medical industry, which creates false research to keep effective medications away from the public, while promoting patented, ineffective medications, and making easy for the public to access (and also to pander to and feed desires for "reward"). And what is a more attractive target for exploitation to those whose belief is self-benefit, than the vital necessities for every human? I think that there is no more prostituted and falsified industry than that of "healthcare."

And what aids the profiteering schemes of drug prohibition and and institutional medicine is that the middle-persons administering them have a belief-set that renders them too simplistic to clue in to the reality, because they're rationalized their status and their judgment upon others as "reward" for their conformity to those monstrous ideologies - and since these are people whose professed truth is self-gratification (which is what self-determined "reward" is all about), many of them are people who will defend a lie even when they know it is a lie, because in doing so they're defending their own comfort, their own reputation, their own profession, their own actions, their own judgments against others... in doing so, they're defending so much that they have held on to, yet which evaluates as False and injustice.

Asking many of them to do what is good and truthful (which are not separate things) is like asking a rich king who in a castle, who believes their status to be a matter of having noble blood (rather than having been in a position to take everything from everyone around them, and having done so), to evenly disperse their wealth and sources of more wealth among the citizens of their kingdom, who live in filth and poverty.



iii.

As I have said, drug-prohibition creates the mental health issues that have been falsely designated to the (far healthier than pharmaceutical) drugs that are taken in an environment of anti-drug attitudes and threats of judgment, violence, legal persecution, ostracization...

A human's brain fundamentally runs on the effect of cocaine, and that will not change.

Now, when a person believes that it is OK to engage in any action, then their mentality, which comprises their whole experience and inner health, is safe in performing that action. But when a person is not fully certain of the rightfulness of an action they take, taking that action causes inner judgment against their own mind, which is the state of some considerations evaluating other considerations of the same mind as not irreconcilable, and creates a divide in the mind.

Considerations are always trying to fulfill the image of all-True, in accordance with the belief they are in. When a person believes in something, and that belief causes the truth of what they believed in to consider into them, that person has ingested all the considerations that comprise the belief that they held as True, and they have become a part of that person.

By the way, this is why Jesus said "I tell you the truth, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you."

(And as I've said at the bottom of this post, life is the movement created by considering)


So, when a person's own action appears as False against any part of the considered (though possibly not wilfully chosen) belief of taking drugs, or of taking certain drugs, or of taking certain drugs in certain conditions, or of hiding their behaviour from people, or having to choose between what their experience registers as good and their acceptance from others... that creates considerations that evaluate as True in a branch of considering, but which are evaluating as False in light of other branches of considering, and yet both branches are streaming a constant stream of considerations as they try to fix any portion of their experience that is not perfectly True in the overall whole. And everything a person experiences is the considering of considerations, and so this creates an agitated and confused state within a person.

That fracturing of the whole mind, and all the considerings that it causes, and all points of considerations being at odds with other considerations and considerings (which are the stress, agitation, and panic that all greater mental health issues branch from), are work to a brain, and require dopamine to fix - and the more breakage there is, the more non-uniformity between considerations of one human brain, the more dopamine it takes to support it all, and to work with it all, and to consider things back into one wholeness.

But the problem was never the usage of any drug, or of having an interest in increasing dopamine - those are acceptable and needed things for a human, so that they can have good mental health. The problem was the acceptance of false messaging from institutional medicine, government, law enforcement, which made people feel guilty, uncertain, and self-doubting by doing what is the equivalent of drinking water to stay hydrated and healthy.

Drug prohibition kills and steals, while the greatest danger involved in taking drugs is the activating of considerations imposed by anti-drug messaging in a manner that causes them to evaluate as True against a person, which causes mental distress, and a need for increasing dopamine.

Drug prohibition has always been a falsehood, built upon falsehoods, and administered by the expression of falsehoods. When a person believes institutional medicine and its practitioners concerning drug use, they are accepting a lethal poison into themselves, which will harm them from the inside any time they engage in behaviour that contravenes what is itself a malevolent lie and falsehood.

A human fundamentally requires dopamine to be mentally and physically healthy - and when they're in distress, they require more dopamine to hold themselves together and reach a positive resolution in their brain and body.



Imagine if, despite needing water to live, some people convinced others that anyone who drinks water is a bad person, and that drinking water will cause them to become dependent upon it. And so, so long as people believed that, anyone who would drink water would experience all kinds of bad things to happen to them, and also become increasingly thirstier for more water. But if they had never heard that drinking water was bad, nothing bad would happen to them if they drank it.

Because belief aligns considerations and causes considering, which is what produces all behaviour and experience, and is also the work for a brain that requires dopamine, that situation is how things are with the conscious taking of dopaminergic substances.

If a person even passively accepts into their mind a concept that causes their own considerations to evaluate against them when they do what is even a vital and completely appropriate action, then any time that a person does that action, they will be causing their own mind to consider against them - increasing their brain's workload, decreasing their inner comfort, decreasing their capacity to work things out for themselves, increasing their need for more dopamine... all because they accepted a false message that ruled against their own body's fundamental needs, and the sovereignty of their mind.



This understanding is the basis of what the apostle Paul wrote:

"Therefore let us stop passing judgment on one another. Instead, make up your mind not to put any stumbling block or obstacle in the way of a brother or sister. I am convinced, being fully persuaded in the Lord Jesus, that nothing is unclean in itself. But if anyone regards something as unclean, then for that person it is unclean. If your brother or sister is distressed because of what you eat, you are no longer acting in love. Do not by your eating destroy someone for whom Christ died. Therefore do not let what you know is good be spoken of as evil. For the kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking, but of righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Spirit, because anyone who serves Christ in this way is pleasing to God and receives human approval.

Let us therefore make every effort to do what leads to peace and to mutual edification. Do not destroy the work of God for the sake of food. All food is clean, but it is wrong for a person to eat anything that causes someone else to stumble. It is better not to eat meat or drink wine or to do anything else that will cause your brother or sister to fall. So whatever you believe about these things keep between yourself and God. Blessed is the one who does not condemn himself by what he approves. But whoever has doubts is condemned if they eat, because their eating is not from faith; and everything that does not come from faith is sin. We who are strong ought to bear with the failings of the weak and not to please ourselves. Each of us should please our neighbors for their good, to build them up."

And as Jesus said:

"There is nothing from without a man, that entering into him can defile him: but the things which come out of him, those are they that defile the man."

Shrapnel

Articles Concerning a Couple of Other Matters Which I've Already Given the Understanding For

i.

Article: Study finds psychopaths have below-average intelligence

I said this long ago, on this blog, that the industry hype about sociopaths and psychopaths having high intelligence was the opposite of the truth, and a product of those who are making such assessments being of sociopathic disposition, themselves - and that it's because they regard peer-praise and the ability to manipulate situations to their personal benefit so highly, that they consider those things to be the picture of intelligence, to them.

I also said that doctor, and scientist, are two of the foremost professions populated by sociopaths / psychopaths - people who have been raised with a discipline-type which taught them 'this determination is good' vs 'this determination is bad,' putting up many roadblocks to considering within their mind and brains, and resulting in them lots of surplus dopamine to make them very functional, self-confident, and scholastically successful, while ultimately being ineffective for much beyond sucking up to the popular themes of the day, and looking for ways they can fit themselves into granfalloons.

That type of disciplining also conditioned their personalities to perceive the experience of dopamine being freed up within their brains due to concluding the work that is considering (which is the work of a brain for which dopamine is required) as though it were "reward" for fulfilling various determinations, since it replenishes in availability each time they cause the desisting of considering. This disposition renders them very non-appreciative and of the truth concerning the states of malady that come about explicitly because of dopamine-deficiency, and it makes them non-empathetic to the great suffering that their doctrine of fiction is responsible for causing for other people. Their mistaken perception results in them feeling justified in exploiting the dopamine-deficiency-caused states of suffering of others for the sake of their own personal self-gratification, which they justify to themselves as "reward" for conformity to peer-approved ideology.



[Side discussion]

That type of disciplining also conditioned their personalities to perceive the experience of the dopamine that freed up within their brains upon their conforming to a peer-approved determination (which ended some considering, freeing up the dopamine being used for that considering) as though it were "reward" for obeying that peer-approved directive. Of course, the actual state of things is that that perception of their was only a symptom of their enormous stupidity, which itself was a product of their being taught 'this is good' vs 'this is bad,' which prevented their own considering of matters within their mind and brain - which would have developed the consideration structure that is smarts.

That's why there is so much drug-related research that concludes things which is not supported by any of the evidence looked at in the study: The writer A) can't understand any of what they're looking at, and so they default to assuming it means a determination about how the substance is negative for health, because they don't know how to consider, and B) conforming to the peer-approved granfalloon makes them feel good, because it avoids considering, freeing up dopamine that was allocated towards figuring something out when they first looked at the matter.

In effect, people who are "reward"-motivated are all junkies, only looking to acquire their next fix as soon as possible, by way of falsifying whatever they're working on. That's why medical science hasn't moved one inch on the matters of dopamine and mental health in a century, and why I produced both those matters' complete understanding, from start to finish, within one year. The professions of doctor and scientist are filled with junkies who are only there for the high of feeling as though they're conforming to the peer-approved granfalloon, and whose only guidance in what they do is the appearance of propriety and authority of their peers, and who work against people who literally need dopamine to be healthy, well, and productive, just so that those doctor and scientist junkies can get their dopamine fixes by conforming to their peers' opposition of those people's lives.

I tell you the truth: The memory of those who work out of "reward" and to prevent acceptance of the truth of human physiological health will be like that given for Nazi guards who stood outside concentration camps, feeling strong, proud, and justified for upholding the murderous and self-aggrandizing granfalloon of their day. And those who call dopamine "reward" will be like early-USA slave-owners, who rationalized their positions of manipulated circumstance in society by framing Africa-Americans as sub-humans and animals, whose greatest possible semblance of civility and contribution to society was under the ownership and whip of their white owners. Those slave-owners, too, used the very same rationalization as "reward" (their being white vs others being black) to justify to themselves their disposition and ability to self-benefit in society, at the expense of those on the under side of their determination - and at the expense of the truth, itself.

The conforming Nazi guard and slave-owners of yesterday are the same people who call themselves doctors and scientists today, serving their institutions' fictions of ideological and capitalistic preference. The same evil found another form, in doctors and scientists, but it is the same evil.



[Back to the main topic]

I said that a psychopath / sociopath is someone whose mind lacks considerations, which are developed through the act of considering, which is the work of a brain that requires dopamine to accomplish. And so, since sociopaths / psychopaths lack the willingness to do the work that requires dopamine to complete, they end up having a lot of surplus dopamine, which is what produces all cognitive clarity and work-potential for a brain, and so those who have lots of it due to not using it for the work of considering have lots to apply to the few considerations that they do have, and make them very proficient in utilizing the few and basic considerations that they do possess.

In other words, due to their large dopamine availabilities (due to being non-considering, but conforming to determinations), sociopaths are highly functional in a society that has been tailored by sociopaths to benefit sociopaths.

Related post: Things to Consider About Sociopathism




ii.

Article: Could signals from the heart trigger fearful reactions based on racist stereotypes?

Thought originates in a person's heart, as belief, which is a 'This Is' command, which then travels as a signal to a person's brain, and filters through all their considerations, becoming articulated in the process. If able, a person's considerations will reason with the belief as it considers through them. And after having being fully considered, there is output a new meaning, which takes a manifest form, such as an action, the development of a new consideration, etc, and so, by way of Reason, what was considered applies back into the mind which considered it.

Related post: Articles: Study Suggests Genetics Could Be The Root Cause Of Schizophrenia (*big yawn*, I already resolved this) (part iv.)


Regarding this: "Thought originates in a person's heart, as belief, which is a 'This Is' command, which then travels to a person's brain, and filters through all their considerations, becoming articulated in the process."

... this is why Jesus said "The good man brings good things out of the good treasure of his heart, and the evil man brings evil things out of the evil treasure of his heart. For out of the overflow of the heart, the mouth speaks."

And Also: "But the things that come out of a person's mouth come from the heart, and these defile them. For out of the heart come evil thoughts--murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander. These are what defile a person; but eating with unwashed hands does not defile them."

And another excerpt, from Mark, says: "'Are you so dull?' he asked. 'Don't you see that nothing that enters a person from the outside can defile them? For it doesn't go into their heart but into their stomach, and then out of the body.' (In saying this, Jesus declared all foods clean.)

'What comes out of a person is what defiles them. For it is from within, out of a person's heart, that evil thoughts come--sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander, arrogance and folly. All these evils come from inside and defile a person.'"

That same also declares all drugs to be clean.



What does it look like, when a person believes in the truth, and that belief invokes Reason and causes considering? It follows the pattern that electricity makes for itself, as it moves through a medium - like can be seen at 1:15 of this video:

Or, like can be seen in the synaptic connections in a person's brain, which are the manifestation of belief.


And this manifestation that starts with belief, and, because of Reason, goes on to produce the truth of all things, is also what Jesus referred to when saying, "The kingdom of heaven is like a mustard seed, which a man took and planted in his field. Though it is the smallest of all seeds, yet when it grows, it is the largest of garden plants and becomes a tree, so that the birds come and perch in its branches."

And also: "The kingdom of heaven is like yeast that a woman took and mixed into about sixty pounds of flour until it worked all through the dough."

Just as yeast causes dough to rise, so do the considerations that emanate from belief cause a mind to rise up into the greater perception, and joining of the truth.


No study or science was required in producing the full understanding of these matters, but only considering them from the belief that is good, and with a willingness for truth, rather than for self-benefit and conformity to peer-approval for the sake of experiencing "reward."

And conforming to, and making determinations for the sake of experiencing "reward" is only different than a person stealing money (rather than truth) to buy crack cocaine in that the person stealing money to buy a dopaminergic drug to experience a dopamine increase may well have a legitimate dopamine deficiency that those stealing truth for their fix have prevented from being addressed through other means.




iii.

All movement is produced by considering, and a person can only act, or move from one state to another by Reason. To be able to consider, to create movement, a person must first have belief, which creates context between considerations and is a 'This Is' declaration, upon which Reason acts. When a person is unwilling to first have belief, their only other option to progress is by creating false reasons by making determinations, which progressively divide and reduce the connectivity of considerations, which forms their mind and being. A person who does not believe, but who makes determinations to benefit themselves, is continually exhausting their spiritual equity. And the state of no longer having any consideration to be move through is the "outer darkness" that Jesus spoke about. The absence of movement of considerations by being considered through other consideration, is death.

And this is also why this declaration from Jesus is truthful: "And this is eternal life, that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent."

And also: "I am the resurrection and the life. The one who believes in me will live even if he dies, and the one who lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this?"


The only way to know something is to have fully considered it, to have its full being considering through oneself, so that it is known - because everything is its considerations.

To have considered something, a person must first have had the belief which provoked and warranted consideration of it. So, if a person truly believes in the only concept which amounts to all considerations, all evaluating as True, all going into one another, producing the state of All in All, then there is no death within that person, but that person has eternal life inside of themselves, and will not see death, as Jesus said: "Very truly I tell you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life and will not be judged but has crossed over from death to life."

And also: "Anyone who loves me will obey my teaching. My Father will love them, and we will come to them and make our home with them."

Shrapnel

The Third Entry Into "An Eclectic Assortment of Articles, Which All Receive Resolution by Understanding Dopamine"

Related posts:
An Eclectic Assortment of Articles, Which All Receive Resolution by Understanding Dopamine
A Few More for: An Eclectic Assortment of Articles...



i.

Study finds searching for the next word while maintaining a gaze becomes too much for your brain to handle

That is entirely a matter of dopamine-availability: The greater the dopamine-availability, the more synapse-branches a brain is capable to hold in context at one time, and the more concurrent activities it can perform, evaluate, and direct. Increasing dopamine (while restraining adrenaline / noradrenaline) is simply a dial that incrementally turns up the performance-equity of a brain, which consequently has the equal effect on the performance-equity of the entire body.

The shifting of eyes, or focus, and every nervous tick, or changing of behaviour, is the re-allocation and prioritization of dopamine in action.



Levels of a feel-good brain chemical diminish over the years

This is because people are being taught to conform to determinations, and the more determinations a person takes into themselves, the more fractured the information contained within their brain and mind becomes, and the more dopamine becomes required to hold all the disparate branches of determination-imprisoned considerations in functional context. This means reduced capacity for such a brain to handle any work - including the process of making more dopamine. This declining progression is the basis of dementia.

The more determinations a person bases their outlook upon, the more disjointed the information within their brain becomes, the less efficient their brain becomes when trying to work with many considerations that are not harmonized, the more dopamine is required for their brain to conduct that work, the less dopamine is available for their brain to do more work with, including work such as producing more dopamine.



Living near heavy traffic increases risk of dementia, say scientists

This is for the same reason that people born with autism can be very sensitive to sound and other stimuli: because all perceived environmental influences are invoking Reason within a person's brain, causing considerations, which are polar, to process the incoming information by considering it - which depends on the allocation of dopamine. So, the more perceived information incoming, the larger a drain there is on a person's dopamine-availability. But, if there is not enough dopamine available to handle all the commands received by Reason, then the considering processes will tear through a person's brain until the perception of truth in the brain is frayed to the point that the brain can no longer perceive the commands that are causing this - and this is because Reason is immutable and cannot be silenced. So, living in an area filled with many different auditory influences is creating a lot of work for a brain, which reduces the brain's work and performance equity, and over time could be a lot of cumulative stress that leads to dementia, which is a mental stress-emergent ailment. And, as I've said all along, mental stress is insufficient dopamine relative to the amount of work which a brain is trying to handle and accomplish.

I also previously explained autistic sensitivity to environmental stimuli as being due to Reason pulling signals through a brain that lacks the dopamine to properly process those signals in the post Dopamine Deficient Signal Routing Causing Affliction in Cases of Autism, OCD, ADD / ADHD...

And, just as I said before, Managing and Increasing Dopamine Can Easily Add Years to a Person's Life and Good Health.



“Pregnancy brain” means reductions in gray matter for new mothers

Weaving a baby in a mother's womb is the work of considering, and it depends upon dopamine to enable and keep safe all the considering work involved. That increased workload for the mother naturally drains the dopamine that is being allocated towards the mother's own brain, and so, unless a mother keeps her dopamine levels high enough to handle both the baby's development and the mother's, there is a bit of atrophy in the mother's brain. This is the same effect as occurs in people with mental stress ailments, such as poverty, and schizophrenia, as pointed out in the post Study Suggests Genetics Could Be The Root Cause Of Schizophrenia (*big yawn*, I already resolved this).


This is also why I previously said in the post Cocaine Use During Pregnancy Can Prevent Autism (and elsewhere) that one of the very healthiest things a pregnant mother can do for themselves, and to fortify the positive development of their child, is to take pure cocaine while pregnant. Other dopaminergics will not work as well, due to their non-beneficial dopamine-to-adren/noradren ratios, nor will cocaine that is cut with common buffing agents that raise adren/noradren. Cocaine greatly inhibits the uptake of noradrenaline by the heart, which keeps the body and brain calm while proficiently raising dopamine-availability in a brain - which makes cocaine a perfect miracle-cure for mental stress ailments, taken properly.



Researchers Find the Possible Culprit Behind Common Autism Problem

Of course, mental stress is insufficient dopamine relative to the work that a brain is trying to handle. And, I've said since long ago that autism is a mental stress ailment, which is the product of development within a pregnant mother being interrupted due to a lack of dopamine-availability within the pregnant-mother's brain.

By the way, the lack of brain-synapse pruning in babies who are born autistic is simply because there wasn't sufficient dopamine-availability in the pregnant mother's brain to develop their baby to the point of concept-resolution, which is when synapse-pruning takes plthe work of synapse-pruning.

And I've also said that being born with incomplete development leaves the autistic child with a very inefficient-working brain, since considerations that resolve into onesness require only one quantum of dopamine to active and have their entire concept be held as True - but that many branches of considerations, which have not yet resolves into oneness will each require their own own quantum of dopamine to activate all the threads that experience a degree of difference between each other. Each point of non-reconciled difference will require dopamine to temporarily consider the difference between the points to make them able to reason together for any particular task.

So, the state of incomplete development that an autistic person is born with leaves them very dopamine-disadvantaged, and their bodies subjected to stress, and higher levels of stress, much more regularly.



Editing genes to eliminate cancer or Schizophrenia could stop the rise of geniuses, scientist warns

Scientists discover the gene editing 'off-switch' that could protect against accidents or stop it from being used for harm

I've talked about this before (A Gene is a Concept - and a quality), and as I said, genes are an output of considering, which is guided by Reason, following belief. When there is an issue with genes, there is an issue in the considering process that is developing them - such as a lack of dopamine to support the developmental work that is considering. But, as genes are an inter-dependent ecosystem, removing some will modify the behaviour of others, and reduce the overall dimension which the body is capable of navigating, and possibly create confusion and genetic memory-loss. A gene was considered into being (an example of 'the world became flesh'), and is living, and has a hope. Removing one to spare the body is akin to removing a suffering person from life on Earth to make things more comfortable for a certain demographic.

By the way, the lack of brain-synapse pruning in babies who are born autistic is simply because there wasn't sufficient dopamine-availability in the pregnant mother's brain to direct and person the action of synapse-pruning.

Do YOU have the angry gene? Scientists discover why some women are more prone to PMT

It is not an angry gene, but when a gene is assisting with work for which there is insufficient dopamine-availability, or when a gene's contribution to work is causing reduced availability for other processes, it creates stress, which frustrates the work of other processes within the body, and can experience as being expressively-inhibited, causing build-up of energy in places, which turns to discomfort and anger. Increasing dopamine while simultaneously inhibiting adren/noradren during PMT will alleviate PMT.



Cellular reprogramming has been used to reverse ageing in living animals for the first time

You know where cells receive their programming from? Belief-invoked Reason, which causing the considering that, amongst all other things, is what is called evolution.

When a person ingests food or drink, pollutant or drug, that thing that is ingested, as all things, are made of considerations, and the influence they bear on a person of a particular state is a relative to the considerations that material communicates with the considerations within the person that receives it. The particular influence of any thing is not based on a determination, but based on how the receiving body of considerations considers the incoming influence. That is why Jesus said, "And these signs will accompany those who believe: In my name they will drive out demons; they will speak in new tongues; they will pick up snakes with their hands; and when they drink deadly poison, it will not hurt them at all; they will place their hands on sick people, and they will get well."

And, as I've said, the truth is one consideration giving itself to another with neither force nor resistance, creating a friction-free bolt of considering of the truth which is what Jesus refers to when saying "For as the lightning flashes in the east and shines to the west, so it will be when the Son of Man comes." And for this purpose, Isaiah spoke, "Every valley shall be raised up, every mountain and hill made low; the rough ground shall become level, the rugged places a plain. And the glory of the Lord will be revealed, and all people will see it together. For the mouth of the Lord has spoken," referring to the organizing of considerations to create the all-True pathway for the only truthful ordering of all considerations to come like a bolt of lightning and pure energy.

Considering via this knowledge changes matter to pure energy, and makes what is immaterial, material.




ii.

These are all very simple problems, with straight-forward solutions, and like Nikola Tesla said of Thomas Edison, "His method was inefficient in the extreme, for an immense ground had to be covered to get anything at all unless blind chance intervened and, at first, I was almost a sorry witness of his doings, knowing that just a little theory and calculation would have saved him 90 per cent of the labor" ... so it also is regarding institutional medicine and those who practice it, and work on its "science" - simply accepting the truth of dopamine, rather than opposing it, and therefore also the lives and well-being of those who needed it, would have saved "scientists" and "doctors" from a century of fruitlessness, of being only a lackey for a corrupt and evil status-quo, and would have saved many, many millions of lives and people from suffering that is greater than anything those calling themselves "scientists" and "doctors" have ever known.


What I have given is a unified and truthful understanding, such as those touted and searched for regarding physics, but for human physiology - freedom from, and cure and prevention of mental suffering and ailment, and the keys to long and robust physical and mental health. All that’s to wait for now, is for the institutional regime of sociopaths to exhaust their fruitless and victimizing denials, and for them to start engaging with the truth. And the greatest potential credit available to them now concerning their professional practices and aspirations, is that they enter into the knowledge brought into the world through the great and humble Siats who overcame all of their death-dealing practices and doctrine.

Shrapnel

Further Information on "Addiction" and Drug-Associated Health Issues, and the Environment That Produces Them

i.

Anything less than True is False, and so it is in a mind, where concepts are made of considerations, which each have a polarity. For a concept to evaluate as True, all its considerations must unify into a True altogether. And if just one of a concept's considerations is aligned against the whole picture, and evaluating as True against that picture, then that entire concept evaluates as False.

If a consideration is aligned against the understanding that what a person does is OK, then that contrarily-aligned consideration is feeding a streaming +1 value against the person's confidence and security, which is a continual +(-1) being imparted upon their  wholeness. This progressively splits the person's mind with growing uncertainty, doubt, anxiety, which can lead to fear, and panic.

And when a person has taken a drug that accelerates the pace at which their mind works, then the descent into internal suffering is all the worse.



ii.

But be sure to make full note that this is not caused by the drug itself, and is a poisonous seed that was sewn in their minds by anti-drug messaging, and messaging of non-acceptance or non-approval for doing such things. The reality will still be that the dopamine which they seek from the drugs they take is still what their brain runs on, and what is needed to make the difference between their suffering and their well-being.

And then those who sowed that harmful self-doubting considering within the people who experience it purport to treat and "help" them, all the while profiting monetarily and reputation-wise off the states that they, and those of their professions before them created, and maintain in society. And then those people further "reward" themselves by fulfilling their determinations for what makes them personally a good dog, contributing to an ideology that is false, and their reward is a release of the same dopamine in their already over-dopamined brains as that which they work to prevent from being increased in the brains of those who need it most.



iii.

The choice to employ social engineering against people who engaged in drug use, which ostracized them and caused all the problems the institution then presents itself as being needed to look after was not done out of caring for the people who were being harmed, and a doctor who employs the institution's teaching does not firstly, and therefore genuinely care about the people they practice those teachings upon. But they are charlatans, who do the things they do, not with the truth, compassion and care for another person as their leading consideration, but because of what I've written in the post A Treatise of Existence, part 2:

When a person makes a determination, they align considerations against one another within their own mind, because of Reason, and the amount of space within their mind that they are able to exist in at any one given time, and have evaluate as True, is reduced, while at the same time, the number of considerations they experience as opposing what they’ve determined to be True increases.

Also, as a person increases the volume of consideration value within their mind that is negative, relative to their determinations, they will feel incomplete unless something fills that negative consideration value, something that they can label and target, and use to define themselves as good by defining good within themselves as being ‘not that,’ contrasting themselves against those things (for example, a physician often fills their negative consideration-value with determined concepts of people who use dopaminergics as having problems that need institutional defining and direction, and simultaneously define themselves as good for not being like this, and so are deserving of their determined concept of "reward," which is the same dopamine, only gained through false-pretenses).



iv.

All things are made of considerations, and whereas a person may do something and physical trace is no longer apparent afterwards, it is not the same with consideration. Everything is delivering consideration to everything else, and all consideration is accounted for in the truth. The consideration of what was done regarding these things remains, lingering in society, and its negative consideration value is tremendous. And here is what has been done:

Government, scientists, and doctors have spent decades disseminating false research and prolific messaging that instils uncertainty, nervousness, doubt, fear, feelings of non-acceptable drug usage, which causes mental agitation, divides a mind, and negative considering when a person takes drugs.  Then they work to convince people that they have a problem, when convincing them of such is the root cause of behaviour that is problematic. Then they use the expression of those things that were artificially put into people and society as justification for doing those things to people with their messaging and ostracization in the first place. They then feed institutions and "professionals" (who are charlatans that don't actually know anything truthful) who profit both monetarily and reputation-wise for "helping" people with the problems they and their institutions created.



v.

Further, because anything less than True is False, by imposing ideological determinations upon people who use drugs, that might convince them that there is a problem, that something is not fully right, that they would be better otherwise, they cause consideration towards the state of full well-being within the person to be aligned against their own state of full well-being, so long as they don't modify their behaviour, and in doing so, they not only create, but they lock-in, as perpetual, the person's state of feeling want and need.

And for those who they successfully convince of their determinations, to conform to them, who do so only to feel more accepted, such as the institution of Alcoholics Anonymous, are left in a state of perpetual imprisonment, not allowed to overcome that consideration that keeps them out of full-being. And because those people have accepted the determinations which are aligned against the thoughts and behaviour of allowing drug use, those people have accepted a prejudice into themselves. And these people are examples of who Jesus spoke of when he said to the Pharisees of his day:

"Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over land and sea to win a single convert, and when you have succeeded, you make them twice as much a child of hell as you are."



vi.

What is considered into a person become digested by their mind, and a part of their feeling and being. And just as with raising a child, a parent has the option of telling things which deliver positive consideration and build a child up and give them strength of character, or deliver discouraging and abusive consideration, which leads to all problems inside of the person, it is the same with adults: Truthful and constructive messaging will build an adult person, while antagonistic, demoralizing consideration will wear an adult person down until they are defeated.

Institutional medicine, government, doctors, scientists have chosen, for decades, to degrade, demoralize, deceive, to instil fear, worry, and doubt into people who use drugs, and to ostracize them for using drugs. If they had seen those people as equal and valuable, then they would have considered them as being equal and valuable. And if they had chosen to consider the person as equal and valuable, and delivered the messaging that affirms a person's right to choose, and to have confidence in their choice, then none of the problems associated which drug use would exist, because those problems are not caused by drug use at all, but by society's chosen reaction and attitude towards it.

It is exactly as written at the end of this article:

"It may well be that prohibition, and distribution of drugs by criminals, gives worse results for the outcomes we think are important, such as harm to the user and to communities through crime. But equally, we may tolerate these outcomes, because we decide it is more important that we declare ourselves to disapprove of drug use."

And it is because government, scientists, doctors chose to deny a person's right to choose over their own body, instead imposing their ideology upon people's bodies and minds, that they are equal to rapists: Because the effects of a person imposing their will upon another bears will always bear the same detrimental meaning upon the considerations of a person's mind, and that detrimental influence is the identity of rape. Do not judge by outside appearance, but judge only once having considered all things truthfully. And remember that I've said that the truth is one consideration giving itself to another with neither force nor resistance.

And all that people who practice rape as their profession have accrued for themselves in property and reputation is ill-gained, and stolen from those whose lives were raped by the messaging that was determined and imposed upon them. And this is the judgement that stands against those who did these things to other people: all the attributed ills of a drug-user's affliction are the debt owed by those who refused to choose a more considerate message to give to those people.



vii.

And beware of the behaviour that I described earlier:

Government, scientists, and doctors have spent decades disseminating false research and prolific messaging that instils uncertainty, nervousness, doubt, fear, feelings of non-acceptable drug usage, which causes mental agitation, divides a mind, and negative considering when a person takes drugs.  Then they work to convince people that they have a problem, when convincing them of such is the root cause of behaviour that is problematic. Then they use the expression of those things that were artificially put into people and society as justification for doing those things to people with their messaging and ostracization in the first place. They then feed institutions and "professionals" (who are charlatans that don't actually know anything truthful) who profit both monetarily and reputation-wise for "helping" people with the problems they and their institutions created.

Because this is typical behaviour of sociopaths: They make determinations to give themselves leverage.

A determination is a falsehood by nature, which says, 'these considerations and not these others', falsely strengthening some connections between considerations while simultaneously falsely weakening others, polarizing and biasing an environment of considerations.

Aligning some consideration against others creates a sense of absence for many considerations and those who share them, which is a perpetual need that does not heal unless the image of truth is restored. And so, for as long as that wound in the truth is prevented from becoming healed, it is an opportunity for those who made and perpetuate it to capitalise on the need, the suffering, and the confusion of those considerations which were attacked and abandoned. So, they impose a falsehood, which creates suffering and sense of need, and then they exploit the situation for their own personal gain.

And this behaviour is what institutional medicine is comprehensively about: Where governments whose pre-determined goal is to produce conclusions which support their drug-prohibition policies are also who license and regulate drug research (which establishes the doctrine from professional practice to academic study), where the companies that choose and fund the research that seeks and receives licenses are 'in the business of shareholder profit, not helping the sick,' where those scientists who carry out the selected, funded, and licensed research, and who produce its conclusions are "reward"-motivated to count-as-confirmed every bias which makes their employer more money and which gains them more recognition, control, and dopamine-availability increase, ... and where those who employ and enforce the narrative chosen by the former three groups have “reward” (increasing their personal dopamine-availability) as their primary motivation, and where those doctors, specialists, etc, have determined that “reward” within themselves to come from contributing to the doctrine that is a murderous lie.


As I've said before, Science, which is the practice of making determinations upon observation, is a method of falsification, and which is a tool of sociopaths, and which instils further sociopathism within a person's mind, and within society.


All the while, the truth is that mental stress, depression, anxiety, psychosis, ADHD, PTSD, autism, bi-polar, schizophrenia, alzheimer’s, parkinson’s, and a lot more, are all only caused by insufficient dopamine-availability in a person relative to the amount of work their brain is attempting, or being forced to consider, and that all of these ailments are completely preventable (and most of them fully curable) by taking cocaine in the right manner. Also also that cocaine, and other criminalized dopaminergics are far healthier and well-being producing that anything that exists within a doctor’s arsenal of effectiveness-reduced, side-effects increased, ailment locking-in pharmaceuticals, and that the real reason why cocaine is prohibited by an echelon of sociopaths from confident use in society, is this:

Because it proficiently works to prevent ailments, to heal ones that exist, to increase mental fortitude and acuity, making its absence seem too great a tool for societal and capitalistic leverage.



Related posts:

Where Does A "Drug-Induced" Psychosis Really Come From?
How Belief Affects Mental Stress Treatment, and the Effect that Anti-Drug Propaganda Has on Mental Health

Shrapnel

How Belief Affects Mental Stress Treatment, and the Effect that Anti-Drug Propaganda Has on Mental Health

i.

One of the most important things for a person who want to treat their mental stress ailment with cocaine, or similar, is that they believe that doing so is perfectly OK, and good to do.
As I've said many times, a consideration is polar. And it is because considerations are polar that Meaning exists. And so, whenever a person engages consideration, they're being led forward.
But when a person moves by determination, they don't progress in the truth.

So, if a person holds a negative belief inside of themselves, a belief being a declaration of 'This Is' to their mind, to which Reason then applies, then that person has False, and hostile-to-truth things considering in their mind, and they accumulate negative consideration value, which reacts in anti-polar fashion to what is good.

And if a person holds a negative and non-accepting belief concerning the action they engage in, then their own choices and lingering actions against their own acceptance of what is allowed causes a judgement against their own actions to evaluate True within their mind, substantiated by their own considerations as aligned according to their deeper belief, and causing their own considerations to turn in their polarity, against them. And they may accrue guilt, and feelings of non-acceptance by what is right, whatever their belief of what is right may be.

If a person continues to engage in what they have believed is wrong, then the amount of consideration which judged them grows, and the amount of consideration which they feel safe within lessens. And this is the cause of all drug-induced psychosis, as I mentioned in this previous blog post: Where Does A "Drug-Induced" Psychosis Really Come From?

If a person had no doubts concerning their choice and activity, then there could be nothing to cause an increase of worry, panic, and fear, within them.

But even if a person doesn't feel right using cocaine, or increasing their dopamine to cure their ailment, this is still the truth: The human brain runs on the effect of cocaine, and all mental stress ailment is only caused by there being insufficient availability of the effect of cocaine within their brain, relative to the amount of work that their brain is engaged with.


ii. 

But where has this highly-detrimental belief within society, concerning the very thing the human brain runs on and engagement of what truthfully prevents mental stress and cures a person of their mental stress states, come from?

Those things have been painstakingly cultivated by governments, by institutional medicine, by scientists, and by doctors and specialists. And when a government has run a sentiment-based fear campaign against drugs, there has always been a large increase in negative influence in society, an increase of vulnerability to issues which cannot be caused by drugs alone, but only if a person has been convinced that the action they engage in anyway is wrongful. All the same mental health issues would ensue if a person, or people were convinced that drinking water made them wrong and unaccepted, yet they drank anyway because they needed to, and their own body informed them of it.

Yet, in the case of anti-drug propaganda, the thing which people in society have been brainwashed to feel uncertain about is the very cure for the mental stress states that arise from having a doubting and uncertain mind. Government, scientists, and doctors, have made people fear their own state of becoming and being healthy, the basic state of being human.

So, if a person wants to be healed of their affliction, it is important that they first understand, and believe within themselves, that taking drugs, and especially cocaine, is perfectly OK, and good for their health. Its effect is what their body was designed by nature to run on, and literally needs to overcome, to develop, and to heal.

And, as I’ve said previously, it will come to be understood that all the harms associated with drug use were caused only by the determined opposition to them by institutional medicine and those who practice it. But drugs on their own do not cause these things, and any activity that a person is uncertain about, but does anyway, will equally be a threat to their mental well-being.

iii.

The apostle Paul spoke from this understanding when he said "For instance, one person believes it's all right to eat anything. But another believer with a sensitive conscience will eat only vegetables."

And again, Paul spoke from this understanding when he said, "'Everything is permissible,' but not everything is beneficial. 'Everything is permissible,' but not everything is edifying."

And when government, scientists, and doctors disseminated falsehoods and insisted determinations upon people in society concerning what drug use is, they were those Jesus spoke of in this parable:

"The kingdom of heaven is like a man who sowed good seed in his field. But while everyone was sleeping, his enemy came and sowed weeds among the wheat, and went away.

When the wheat sprouted and formed heads, then the weeds also appeared. "The owner's servants came to him and said, 'Sir, didn't you sow good seed in your field? Where then did the weeds come from?' "'An enemy did this,' he replied. "The servants asked him, 'Do you want us to go and pull them up?' "'No,' he answered, 'because while you are pulling the weeds, you may uproot the wheat with them. Let both grow together until the harvest. At that time I will tell the harvesters: First collect the weeds and tie them in bundles to be burned; then gather the wheat and bring it into my barn.'"

The seeds of the enemy are the determinations of government, scientists, and doctors, made for the purpose of creating self-benefiting leverage in society, enforcing their ideology, giving their prejudice a target, and providing themselves with a sense of "reward."

Those determinations have produced much harmful considering in many of the most vulnerable people in society, and the mental stress ailments in society today are the weeds grown from the harmful considering that sprouted from the seeds of institutional and government-run medicine.

And the produced consideration that deepens the articulation and fine perception of a mind, allowing a person to finally understand this situation, is the fruit of the good seed, which was to be protected while the weeds were let to grow alongside. And now is the time to gather the weeds into bundles to be burned, so that only what is good may remain standing.

iv.

The false, determination-based and sentiment-driven philosophy that doctors, scientists and government rely on for dissemination their objectives concerning drug-use in society, when accepted as True by people, leads a person's consideration into all the harms which have been falsely attributed to drug-use that can be witnessed in society today, because that philosophy is not born of the consideration that brings the truth.

And as Jesus warned those he taught the truth to, to "Watch out and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees." The leaven, which causes dough to rise, is the considering caused by an accepted belief. When what has become accepted as True is bad, so is what rises from it. The same warning applies today, regarding the leaven of doctors, scientists, and government, which causes mental stress ailment, inequality, prejudice, and much suffering to rise within society.

As Jesus said, "A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit." And also, "Make a tree good and its fruit will be good, or make a tree bad and its fruit will be bad, for a tree is recognized by its fruit."

The tree Jesus spoke of is the structure of consideration which forms by a person's belief. It grows, and has branches, just like the neural network in a person's brain grown and develops branches according to a person's belief, because belief is a declaration of 'This Is', to which Reason then applies, causing considering, which is the source of all development, including human evolution.

What is the judgment of a tree which has not produced understanding and good results for the last 100 years (the very same length of time since cocaine became restricted from medical use), and the fruit of which has been the continuation, and entrenching of mental stress ailments in society?

As Jesus said, "Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire." And so it is time to cut down the False-bearing tree of institutional medicine.

v.

As the apostle Paul also said, "Those who feel free to eat anything must not look down on those who don't. And those who don't eat certain foods must not condemn those who do, for God has accepted them."

The same must apply, and does, regarding those who choose to use drugs, and those that don't: That they must not be ostracized by society for their choices concerning what they put into their own bodies in accordance with their belief, and they must not ostracize others for their choices concerning what they put into their own bodies in accordance with their own belief.

And there must not be efforts to manipulate the outcomes of any such use by those who choose to engage it.

Related post: A Few More for: An Eclectic Assortment of Articles

Shrapnel