Article: Asthma drugs may reduce Parkinson’s risk (yet another lap around the same track)

Article: Asthma drugs may reduce Parkinson’s risk



i.

This isn't a mystery, and it shares the same explanation as a great multitude of other ailment-medication responses: Clenbuterol increases dopamine, and dopamine is the human brain's work fuel, and is what it uses to connect information across synapses. Any time dopamine is being increased, a brain's work capacity is being increased, and any time dopamine is reduced, a brain's capacity for work is reduced and stress is increased. Mental stress is merely a lack of dopamine availability within a brain relative to the amount of work a brain is trying to do, and is comparable to dehydration being a lack of water, and asphyxiation being a lack of oxygen.

Depression, anxiety, psychosis, ADHD, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, schizophrenia... they all emerge from the state of stress that is dopamine deficiency, and they can all be effectively treated, even cured, by increasing dopamine while inhibiting adrenergic influence. The interrupted fetus development that is autism is again a case of insufficient dopamine availability within a pregnant mother, and autistic child-births can also be prevented by ensuring dopamine levels are high enough relative to other things in a pregnant mother.

Relatedly, what is called the placebo effect is positive belief reducing the micro states of uncertainty and worrying (those things causing considering in a brain, which is the work of a brain for which dopamine is required), which reduces the work in a brain, which frees up dopamine availability for a brain, which consequently leads to improved health.

Most dopaminergics have an unfavourable adrenergic influence alongside their positive dopaminergic influence, and increasing adrenergic influence worsens stress states. However, cocaine is one dopaminergic which does inhibit adrenergic response, and is excellent at inhibiting adrenergic response while greatly increasing dopamine availability within a brain.

In fact, when applied with understanding, it is possible to flush a severe and long-existing psychosis from a person in just a mere couple of hours, or less, using pure cocaine.



ii.

And don't forget Schizophrenia:

Exhibit A) Study Suggests Genetics Could Be The Root Cause Of Schizophrenia

"The findings may help explain the longstanding mystery of why brains from people with schizophrenia tend to have a thinner cerebral cortex with fewer synapses than unaffected individuals do," said a press statement from the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, whose experts took part in the study.

This is the brain's outer layer, often referred to as grey matter, involved in learning and memory."


Exhibit B) Mice Fed with Cocaine Show Growth in Brain Areas Linked with Learning, Memory

Looks like we have a match!


It's also the same reason why Methylene Blue helps against Alzheimer's, why coffee does the same and can help a person to live longer, why Modafinil is a "smart drug", why teenagers who lack what fuels a person's working memory capabilities end up using dopaminergic drugs while simplifying life helps prevent future mental illness, why poverty has the effect on people that it does, and why a million other dopaminergics help against a million dopamine-deficiency ailments:

An Eclectic Assortment of Articles, Which All Receive Resolution by Understanding Dopamine

A Few More for: An Eclectic Assortment of Articles...

The Third Entry Into "An Eclectic Assortment of Articles, Which All Receive Resolution by Understanding Dopamine"


It's all one thing - same cause, same solution.



iii.

Dopamine is only "reward" to a sociopath, who, because of their low consideration, associates the increased dopamine availability they experience from doing the types of things which they have determined to indicate that they are good little dogs as being a confirmation of their good little dogginess. This understanding is an inversion of the truth. What's actually happening is the same thing as happens with placebo:

"positive belief reducing the micro states of uncertainty and worrying (those things causing considering in a brain, which is the work of a brain for which dopamine is required), which reduces the work in a brain, which frees up dopamine availability for a brain, which consequently leads to improved health, cognitive strength, and positive feeling."


To someone that isn't a sociopath, dopamine is not "reward," or something that comes in the end, but physio-fuel, and what is required to be there in the beginning for proper and intended functionality, and for proficient and healthy development. To human physiology, it is the god-molecule.


Conventional medicine is firstly about ideology and profit, and not truth. The truth is that an enormous host of illnesses, particularly mental illnesses, all only emerge and branch from mental stress, which itself is simply a lack of dopamine availability in a brain relative to the amount of work that brain is trying to accomplish.

And much research that is done concerning related topics is primarily about the researcher seeking to experience peer-approved "reward" for conforming to and supporting a dogmatic ideology.


To sum the situation up from one angle: Institutional and academic medical doctrine is fake. It is the 21st century's equivalent of practising the four humours, and would only be more so if the four humours was a patented practice that earned its patent-holders money every time it was practised.



iv.

because it strips them of all the determinations they've used as justification for


Why do today's scientists revel in historical stories such as Galileo facing off against an institution of dogmatic ideologues who had all the evidence they were willing to consider to prove that Earth is the centre of the universe, when today's scientists are the same as the people Galileo faced off against?

And this is a pattern that has occurred throughout history: An individual person considers beyond conventions because of the greater belief they have within themselves, and by their consideration discovers new marvels that they then make known to everybody.

But all those who move by determinations oppose the greater consideration presented, because what is presented strips those people of all the determinations they've made to justify themselves, invalidating their prejudiced judgments, their perceptions of their statuses, their reputations as knowledgeable authorities...

In time, however, the greater truth become reinforced as indisputable, and then those whose truth is their determinations begin to make determinations about everything surrounding the new thing and begin turn it into an ideology, an institution, and a dogma. Then, sociopaths from all over flock to that thing and conform to it, not because they understand and know it, but because the appearance of consensus is what they take as truth. And they reinforce that thing with all kinds of extraneous infrastructures, and wave that thing all around as their "proof" of many other things, including why they're smarter than the dogmatic ideologues of history who did the same thing as they are doing - because now they have the right determination to conform to and invest their sentiments into.

But the truth is not a determination.



Related post: Addendum to the Previous Post about Parkinson's Receptibility to Dopamine, And Also Something of Psycheparous

Shrapnel

Where Does A "Drug-Induced" Psychosis Really Come From?

i.

A consideration is polar and directional, and everything is contributing towards a movement. The static state of observation which those who call themselves scientists and doctors believe in doesn't exist in the truth, and it is only their lack of connectivity to the truth, and their fear of the truth, that they rest all their sense of safety upon that false concept. Observation is guilt by choice of inaction towards doing what is good, and serving of the truth.


ii.

While it's considered that using some psycho-active drug may cause psychosis, anxiety and psychosis cannot occur if a person is of sound mind regarding their actions and experience. A person's uncertainty is a concept, made of considerations, which evaluate True as a "This is" command within their mind, so long as they participate in whatever they are uncertain about. The "This is" produces considering, and other considerations progressively consider through that concept, and receive its influence imparted upon their own values. This can cause a mind to progressively divide itself, and produce anxiousness, and also lead to psychosis.

Therefore, drugs do not cause psychosis, but how a person considers their actions can divide their mind. So, who is responsible for predisposing, through decades-long concerted manipulation, the public's considering towards worry, anxiousness, fear, and guilt, regarding the consumption of criminalized and non-prescribed drugs?


iii.

When it comes to "drug-induced" psychoses, the situation is as if a government were to put an electronic bracelet around a people's legs that is capable of exerting great pressure, and will automatically crush and break the leg of a person if ever their two feet come off the ground at once.

And so, when the person jumps, for whatever reason, the bracelet which their government placed around their leg crushes their leg, and then their government says "see, we told you jumping was bad, because it causes your leg to break - this is why we need to have strict rules against jumping". But, of course, there never was anything about jumping that cause the leg to break, and it was completely the government's intervention of putting that bracelet around people's legs that was designed to crush their legs, which caused the person's leg to break, which the government then used to justify having a no-jumping policy, and having leg-crushing bracelets to enforce that policy.

The reality is that the bracelet is an artificial imposition, designed to create an impression for its own necessitation, and removing it will free a person and resolve the real source of threat.

So it is with anti-drug propaganda, which has been brain-washing to force the outcome which is used to push drug enforcement: Drug-induced psychoses are not actually drug-induced, but are actually anti-drug propaganda-spouting doctor, scientist, police and government-induced. And then those people use the product of their own false determinations as justification for continuing their falsehoods.


iv.

It is not within a drug's power to choose which way a mind is going to consider something. But the propaganda disseminated in anti-drug efforts has forcefully sought to lead consideration surrounding drugs in a negative direction - and it is that negatively-considering direction, accelerated by increases in adrenaline, which causes harms such as anxiety and psychosis.

But no matter how much effort is made to convince people to be of less-than-sound mind towards drug use, at the end of the day, the human brain still runs on drugs, particularly the effect of cocaine. And so, the effect of cocaine, applied knowingly, continues non-waveringly to be panacea for all mental stress states. And sociopaths who have been comprehensively in denial of reality for many decades will not make that change by their forceful determinations, contrived research, dissemination of misinformation, and threats.


v.

Every consideration traces back to where it came from. I said before that it will become seen that all the greatest harms surrounding drugs were created by those who oppose them. And so it will be.

When one person causes another, by way of a forceful determination, to pre-emptively accept something as harmful apart from all consideration of it, Reason still applies to that determination within the mind of the person who accepts it as True, and then the people who forced that determination upon others become responsible for the negative consideration that ensues in the person who accepted it.

The negative consideration-value in society due to anti-drug propaganda and drug criminalization is tremendous, and is the cause of virtually all mental health issues relating to drug use, and much of which is not directly produced by drug use. At the end of all things, doctors, scientists, governments, police, will all be held responsible for that tremendous negative consideration-value, and all the harms it has caused people.



Related post:  How Belief Affects Mental Stress Treatment, and the Effect that Anti-Drug Propaganda Has on Mental Health

Shrapnel

Dopamine Deficient Signal Routing Causing Affliction in Cases of Autism, OCD, ADD / ADHD...

This image is regarding a common behaviour of an autistic person:

With some of these things, and also with some cases of "OCD", the person is trying to alleviate strain within their brain by associating a personal meaning with those items, which references considerations within their brain, and by moving the items in the world, it helps navigate and order them within their brain. The person doing this does not necessarily recognize the behaviour as guiding signals within their brain, but rather feel that things just need to be a certain way. The ordering of the items in the above picture is the person ordering the considerations within their brain in the manner that feels right, and which alleviates suffering. Similarly, if a person harms their creations made while they pay attention, it can cause signals to rip through their brain, and inflict pain upon the person which they don't know how to express.

All this can also play a part in "OCD", but other cases of "OCD" are different expressions of dopamine-deficiency, where their mind is caught in a loop regarding a thing, because there isn't the dopamine for it to make the connection to advanced information to lift the signal routing out of that loop.

The difference is that in one instance, the signal is still trying to move towards its proper destination, but with great difficulty without having the sufficient dopamine to make the journey, and this causes a great exhaustion and strain within the brain. In the other instance, a signal routing is not really connected to its originally-intended destination anymore, and is looping in a manner that dictates a person's actions.

Also, when it works for a non-autistic person to calm their mind by going for a walk, or a drive, or by watching ASMR videos, they are also similarly assisting signal-navigation within their brain, while also manipulating dopamine levels. These things can all also be achieved by increasing dopamine availability within the person's brain by taking some cocaine.



In other situations, there is a lack of dopamine to regulate a signal properly at synapses, but the signal is still being pulled along its path routing with great force, as the signal is synced to many other signals, which create a value to its force which overpowers the resistance it experiences at synapses - and this is what is behind sensitivity to audio and other senses, a suffering that is associated with Autism, which is being demonstrated in this video, though which can occur without autism being involved.

And at other times, a signal for which there isn't sufficient dopamine to keep it connected with its parental signal processes can be dropped, and this is what is the cause of ADD / ADHD.



All of these states are explicitly due to insufficient released dopamine in the person's prefrontal cortex, and all of these states are successfully alleviated by increasing the available dopamine within a person's prefrontal cortex. But allowing adrenaline / noradrenaline to increase alongside dopamine will exacerbate the afflicting states within areas of the brain, and could lead to further pain, or anxiety, and psychosis (things which are also product of insufficient released dopamine within a person's brain relative to the work that it's trying to perform). This is why cocaine is the ideal and truth-based solution to mental stress states, while licensed medications regularly do more harm than good, and ultimately are not real, compassionate, or healthy treatments.

Autism is caused by a developmental interruption, most likely cause by dopamine deficiency of the mother during their pregnancy, and the non-completed state of development it leaves a person's brain in results in their brain handling tasks very non-efficiently, which is consequently cumbersome on that person's brain's dopamine availability. And the suffering from the person who has autism is their lack of dopamine to properly handle the work their brain is trying to do.



Leaving these people in their dopamine deficient states is inhumane torture, the likes of which the typical doctor has no experience to reference, to be capable of making a sound, judicious judgement regarding. People need to stop listening to doctors and government to address their mental health, because those people are neither interested nor qualified to do anything for these things, and all of their training has been to divert public away from the truth about mental stress / dopamine deficiency ailment, all their medications are designed to capitalize monetarily on the existence of mental stress states, and not to resolve them. And to prevent autism in child-birth, it could be wise for a pregnant mother to occasionally take medium, or even large amounts of cocaine in relaxed settings during their pregnancy - and doing so will fortify the healthy development of their child.

This is the truth, and it stands in marked contrast with what institutional medicine tells people, because institutional medicine is a doctrine create by and for sociopaths, and is not the truth. Doctors are those who carry out the institutional medicine's genocidal doctrine, and tell themselves that they are good for doing so, so that they can experience "reward" inside of themselves: a bit of crack cocaine as their payment for betraying innocent human life.


By the way, in the case of an autistic person, who moves physical things to guide the considerations within their brain, it is just as Jesus explained when he said "I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven". All things are made of considerations, and what a person sees is manifestation of considerations - and to move one is to move the other: to move what is manifest of consideration moves the consideration; to move the consideration is to move what is manifestation of the consideration. This applies to all reality.

Shrapnel

Article: I told the truth in my sister's obituary, so that others might choose to live (One Way Dopamine Deficiency Can Kill)

I told the truth in my sister's obituary, so that others might choose to live

i.

To be honest, it wasn't depression that lied to this girl and caused her death, but it was doctors, scientists, and government who lied to her and caused her death. Her death, and the state which provoked it, was entirely preventable, in full, simply by sufficiently increasing the released dopamine within her brain to the level that the work her brain was trying to perform required, while simultaneously inhibiting adren/noradren. She is one of hundreds of millions who have been killed by the falsehoods which doctors, scientists, and government have created, and which they base their conduct upon. The truth would have saved all of their lives.



ii.

From the article:

"I felt like I was in a vacuum in the middle of space with everything I knew being pulled away from me."

This refers to the sister of the girl who endured depression, and not to the depressed girl herself, but it is a bit of the same experience the depressed girl may have felt. Once the sister was faced with a worrying situation, with many things to be considered, the strain on her dopamine availability would have skyrocketed. Her brain would become clogged up with unfinished processes as there would become less and less dopamine to connect considerations with, to produce sense of meaning, purpose, knowing, control, and future sight.

Similarly, as her sister continued on in her dopamine deficiency-induced depressive state, every one of her considerations, represented as synaptic connections within her brain, experienced meaningless when it could not connect to others. And when they all questioned 'Why', they could hear no answer. And the culmination of their loss of hope for life resulted in her own death.

iii.

Also from the article:

"After what seemed like an eternity, the police officers told me plainly: "Aletha is dead." What followed that stark statement was a sudden moment of lucidity in which only one thing mattered: the truth."

The truth is the only thing that mattered before, and knowing it would have seen her never be at risk succumbing to depression. Depression is an artificial and contrived ailment, created by obstructing access to sufficient dopamine within a person's brain.

Dopamine provides the difference between a person's considerations working upwards or falling downwards; between them increasing in inter-connectivity that strengthens a sense of support, and them losing association and all their qualities of hope and meaning dissipating; between a mind growing in clear-lit sightedness, or fading into darkness.

This girl died because nobody let her engage the truth of her brain. It is as if everyone were to tell a person that water was bad for them, that it would kill them, and that they should just ignore the symptoms of dehydration - and so they do, and then they suffer in perpetual agony until they die. Though dehydration would leave them only suffering for weeks until they died, whereas dopamine deficiency would keep a person suffering for years, and suffering every bit just as intensely, and with the possibility for lot more.

iv.

Again, from the article:

"Depression stole decades of our lives together. Depression lies. I have to tell the truth."

No, depression tells the truth. All those things the article says that she thought she was hearing from her depression, they were the considerations which institutional medical doctrine delivered to her, and her brain was considering the truthful meaning of them.

The negative considerations that she experienced in her depression was what the situation truthfully adds up to. A person is only in such a state because their brain is not being provided the dopamine which is required for the amount of work that is being submitted to it, and which it is trying consider to resolution. 

A person's brain is also a living being, and the various areas of a brain, and have their own awarenesses, which they are eager to share with the person the body belongs to, if they are considered into one. A brain's work is considering, and that work needs dopamine to handle. The needed dopamine could be provided, and it is rightful for it to be provided. So why wasn't it provided?:

Is she not worth it? Is there something wrong with her? Is she less than other people? Didn't she like the good things her brain was considering for her? Is her brain defective and incorrect in thinking that the things its trying to resolve are good to resolve? Is there a problem somewhere in her considering (and this will cause many more considerings to commence) Did she hate her brain? Is her brain unworthy in her sight? Did her brain do something wrong? What did she do wrong?

These are all logical and reasonable things for a brain to wonder when it is not being supplied with the dopamine it is deserving of. Ultimately, her lack of dopamine added up to meaning that her life must not be valuable and of worth. By being squarely responsible for the environment that means these considerations, that is what scientists told her, what doctors told her, what government told her, and what the society formed by these harmful people told her. And all that her brain wanted, and rightfully deserved, was dopamine.

Depression was her brain pleading with her to supply it the dopamine it needed to handle and resolve the work it was trying to accomplish. Depression was her brain knowing that it was giving its full self the considering of perfection within her, like her own Jesus, and despite giving absolutely everything to her, she wasn't giving it the one thing it needed to make everything good for them together, as one life. Her brain would have experienced the confusion and desperation of a child being mercilessly suffocated by a parent who they fully loved and had given their full self to serve.

This girl died explicitly for the sake of the prejudices of highly sociopathic, society-deceiving, and self-rewarding doctors, and scientists, and for the sake of their century of lies. She died so that doctors could tell themselves they are good dogs when they feed the lies of institutional medicine to society, causing a shutting-down of considering in doctor's brain once they convince themselves that they are in the right, causing a stream of dopamine to free up within their brains, giving them a "reward"-high . That release of dopamine was not rightfully theirs, and they are undeserving of it. That release of dopamine was stolen from Aletha and millions of others. It was the dopamine that Aletha needed to live, which was taken from her for the self-servingness of doctors, and scientists, and all those that uphold institutional medicine.

This girl was liquidated by doctors and scientists. And contrary to the outward expressions they would make, the doctors and scientists wouldn't have it any other way - and a century of their arrogance didn't have it any other way.

Depression didn't lie to her, because depression was her brain considering the truth of what was happening. But the society formed doctors, scientists, and government lied to her, and had conditioned her to ignore the things that fundamentally mattered - to ignore the desperate pleas and needs of her most special and intimate friend, the one that works perfectly to help create her meaning, potential, success, happiness, dreams...

And by saying that depression lies, guilt is being shifted from where it belongs, which is at the feet of doctors, who are the perpetrators of lies, and to where it doesn't belong - which is, at best, a figment, and at worst, accusing one's own truth-considering mind of being dishonest for wondering the things that the false considerations of doctors truthfully add up to.



v.

And again, from the article:

"The lies of depression can exist only in isolation. Brought out into the open, lies are revealed for what they are."

Isolation is what happens to considerations in a brain when there isn't dopamine enough for them to connect with other considerations to the extent that they can form reasons, together. A lone consideration has no value, no purpose, and no truth. It is reason that lets a consideration enter into all of those things. And dopamine is reason for that connectivity within a brain. Dopamine is truth to a brain's capability to consider. Without it, a consideration falls into darkness. And as life is the movement created by considering, which is one consideration giving itself to another, when a consideration becomes isolated, it dies.

From the article:

"Here is the truth: You have value. You have worth. You are loved. Trust the voices of those who love you. Trust the enormous chorus of voices that say only one thing: You matter. "

Reason's primary principle: Everything necessarily means every else. If the above statements are true, then a brain is worthy of the dopamine it is made to have, and which its work is accomplished by. And if a brain is refused that dopamine, and if a brain is told it is right that it is not being delivered that dopamine, then the above statement can not be true, and everything about the brain's existence will confirm this - because a brain is made to have plenty of dopamine, and dopamine is meant to be available within a brain.

If the above quoted statements are true, then a person must allow its brain the dopamine which is essential to its growth and good health, and to its worthy comfort, and which is a belonging part of it having value, worth, and of being loved. A truth-considering brain cannot be fooled - so long as it is denied the dopamine it needs, it will know that something is missing, and its work will suffer. Otherwise, its considerations will die until it is working beneath its dopamine availability's headroom. But a person is their considerations, and to let them die is to let aspects of the person die. And if some aspects of the person are let to die, then why not the others? And by what authority or arrogance does one or some considerations elects others of the same body to die, while they live? Life is all, or nothing, and institutional medicine is explicitly telling those with mental stress that their lives are not valued by doctors, scientists, and government, other than to serve as their lucrative livestock.

vi.

Teenagers are particularly vulnerable to dopamine deficiency / mental stress because of all the additional work that their brains are performing at this time of heightened development, and consequently, teenage years are among the most valuable for a person to boost their dopamine levels, to fortify the robustness of that development, so that their mind and body will be at its strongest for the rest of their lives.

Other key areas of life that are prime periods for boosting available dopamine availability are during a woman's pregnancy, and also post-childbirth for a woman, and also any other area where a person encounters troubling mental stress, and stress in general.

That stress is a person's brain's workload exceeding the headroom which its available dopamine grants them, and raising available dopamine will raise the headroom that is their brain's healthy work capacity. And doing so will avoid all harms that come from a workload's exceeding of dopamine levels straining a brain and body.

Prevention is the best attitude, and ultimately is the only responsible and reality-based approach.



vii.

Institutional medicine is a lethal racketeering scheme, and doctors are just those stupid, inexperienced, and sociopathic enough to be the oblivious or willing middle-people to pull it off, and who receive benefit for it: Clowns whose entire self-assuredness rests, not in knowing anything, but in sensing authority as existing in the appearance of a peer consensus. They are highly-functional, particularly with fact-memorization, due to having plentiful dopamine-availability, which is due to their being little considering, and due to them constantly issuing themselves the considering-avoiding determination that they're good dogs because they parrot a peer-approved set of things.

Shrapnel

Article: Mental illness mostly caused by life events not genetics, argue psychologists

Article: Mental illness mostly caused by life events not genetics, argue psychologists


To be specific, there are two root causes of mental illness: socipathism, which is the lack of consideration of the truth, and mental stress, which is the lack of released dopamine to handle the workload of considering that a brain is trying to do. And so the mental illness indicated by that above linked-to article is caused by the impact that life events have on a person's dopamine availability. With sufficient dopamine availability, a person will be able to rise above every challenging event.

That overcoming is a brain considering the meaning of every consideration which is a part of the event which a person encountered. And having greater dopamine availability won't change the amount of work which is to be done, but will make every workload weigh less and be handled with greater ease, and in less discomfort.

And genes are outputs of considering, which is the work of a brain that requires dopamine to do, and which suffers when a brain hasn't enough dopamine availability to perform it - and that suffering is then expressed in all the outputs of the processes which had to work without sufficient dopamine. And it is the false doctrines of reward-seeking sociopaths that has created the influences in society which are to blame for the continued existence and prevalence of mental health issues.



It's incredible that however many people (scientists, doctors, psychologists, etc...) have spent 100 years accomplishing absolutely nothing but an endless wild-goose chase of their own preferred determining.

A bunch of dopamine-plentiful people determined that it was better that any number of dopamine deficient people be tortured their whole lives, in pain, unhappiness and despair, conceding experience and opportunity, endlessly enduring agonizing stress and anxiety... all of it just because the dopamine-plentiful people found it preferential to their own comfort and position in society. Those people have been no different than slave owners whose entire fortunes were built on the backs of exploitation of others, and who would not give up their slaves, but would forcefully argue against the abolition of slavery - and they are still doing it.

Keeping dopamine deficiency states in society lets doctors and their ilk pretend that they're deserving of their reputation, their incomes, their self-determined "rewards"... but none of it is true. They are the most dishonourable of people, and their whole state in life has been built upon a lie, fraud, the undetected genocide of innocents and the most vulnerable. Everything that any doctor has ever judged a drug user of being all applies to doctors, themselves: They are in denial of reality, they harm others in pursuit of their goal, their ideology is selfish and only serving of them, they steal from people (their very lives), they cheat people (of their very mind, good health, and again lives)... they are acting out a sociopathic fantasy, and like bumbling idiots pretending that they are anything at all representing good.



This is what a doctor really is the custodian of:
Nixon official: real reason for the drug war was to criminalize black people and hippies

All modern institutional approach to drugs and health treatment is rooted in false and contrived drug propaganda, and is, itself, propaganda. And when governments, whose prerogative has been to use scare tactics to keep people away from looking at criminalized substances objectively, controls drug research licensing, and when pharmaceutical companies, who make their profit from inferior medications, fund the drug research that's available while also lobbying governments, and when a doctor’s greatest qualification for their job is precisely that they have no experience but are dopamine-rich due to being little-considering, what do you think that the expectable outcome from drug research and application will be?

The lie has been too sweet for doctors to pass up. They tell themselves that they deserve the things which that lie promised them, having jumped through the hoops of medical school, having not engaged in all the things they made harsh and harmful judgements against others for doing... they tell themselves that their placement in the lie is their "reward" - and they seek that reward more than they seek to do good for others. That reward, by their own labelling, is a release of dopamine within their brains. And so, in the end, they've been nothing but crack addicts, leeching off society and doing it harm for the purpose of trying to instil as much sense of that "reward" inside of themselves as they can. And their determinations in pursuit of this shut shuts down their considering, leading there to be much dopamine to fuel their depravity. And their depravity is that they have turned a falsehood into trillion-dollar industries, and that their whole livelihoods are built upon the liquidation of the lives of others, under pretence of helping them.

As Jesus said, no person can serve two masters: Either they will love one and hate the other, or vice versa. This is the same as what I said: For all things there is an ordering of considerations. And the final consideration will flip the polarity of all those that came before it and did not acknowledge it. A person who is reward-oriented is not truth-oriented, and a person who serves their own reward will hate the truth, because the truth says that their self-determined reward doesn't exist in the truth: There is no reward for the truth - the truth is, and there is no other. And Reason will flip the polarity of the entire world so that the truth may present in it once again.

Shrapnel

A Crash-Course in the Basics for Truth-Based Human Health Treatment

Dopamine, serotonin, adrenaline, opioids, cannabinoid receptors, GHB receptors... from the day a human is born, even for one that's in their mother's womb, their brain is an ongoing drug bath. And all human experience and productivity are achieved and expressed through the manipulation of drug levels in a person's brain.

i.

Some most basic understanding that is essential for a person to be capable of compassionately and successfully treating people of their stress / dopamine deficiency ailments is as follows:

a)

Dopamine is the means by which a brain does all the work that is considering, which is the work by which a brain and its person develops, learns, memorizes, recalls, decides, etc, and is work that the rest of the body's health is subject to. A person's potential and successes are subject to their brain's access to released and available dopamine:

- Work is only possible for a person and brain in an environment of having enough dopamine for it, and dopamine levels are what form a person's head-room for their work potential: More dopamine equates to a greater work potential, while less dopamine equates to less work potential.

- The weight of any body of work, and the effort required for it from a particular person, is entirely relative to the amount of released dopamine which a person has within themselves: It is possible for something which has a work weight value of +5 to a person of high dopamine availability, to have a work weight value of +500, or greater, to a person of low dopamine availability.

- Lower dopamine means that a brain isn't able to connect as much information at one time, and must address work in piecemeal, rather than in its entirety at once, or using larger concepts.

- Lower dopamine exposes a person's brain and body to greater affliction by keeping the brain in a continuous state of trying to catch up on work, without allowing it reach resolution of work so that it could implement the meaning of its resolutions in ways which create solid foundations for the mental and physical environment, and fortify them against detected vulnerabilities.

- Also, lower dopamine means that a brain isn't able to access larger concepts, such as the concept of a particular objective. Concepts are formed by connecting considerations, and that connecting is reliant on dopamine availability. The more dopamine that can be allocated, the greater number of considerations can be held in positive connection, and worked with simultaneously.

This means that a person's capability to overcome matters, such as emotional, mental, and physical, is relative to the released and available dopamine which they have in their brain. What seems a straight-forward and easily doable matter to a dopamine-plentiful person can appear like an insurmountable mountain to a person with low dopamine availability. And what is easy and straight-forward for a person with lots of dopamine availability is extremely more difficult, and less certain, even impossible, for a person with notably less dopamine availability.


A lot of people with high dopamine availability misjudge their worth by basing their assessment on outward appearance of their accomplishments and productivity relative to the general populace, without ever being aware that many of the people they judge as least motivated, productive, and ambitious, are exerting greater than 50x the effort each day, while accomplishing very little, compared to many of the people who are the greatest achievers by outward appearance. 

And those who are greater achievers are such only by way of having greater dopamine released within their brains, which many of them have precisely because they are less willing to consider fairly and truthfully, but instead make determinations which cater to their pre-existing prejudices, and which serve to establish 'reward' for themselves.

Having the dopamine for work makes it possible, easier, and desirable to accomplish more. Often, a person's sense of visible accomplishment causes them to feel more entitled to good things than those who accomplish little in the eyes of society. They do this because they sought to justify themselves by their determinations - but no one is justified by their determinations, and rather are justified or non-justified according to the consideration by which their works are done, in the sight of all truth.

As said by Jesus: "I tell you the truth, this poor widow has given more than all the others who are making contributions. For they gave a tiny part of their surplus, but she, poor as she is, has given everything she had to live on."

So it is often the case between those who accomplish visibly little, and those who achieve many things for themselves. And many who are doctors, scientists, entrepreneurs, etc, are in fact the most lazy, self-justifying, and entitled-feeling in all society.

b)

“Sober” is a context-dependent term, and ultimately there is no such thing as a sober human being, because all human experience and exertion is manifested through the constant manipulation of all the things which both legal and criminalized drugs equally manipulate within every human's brain. Human life is a drug-fuelled experience, and the only truly sober human is a dead human.

c)

"High" is a relative term: Say the typical scholastic achiever experiences a standard dopamine level of +40, while someone with a depression, or a psychosis, or anxiety has a vastly lower standard dopamine experience level, say +2, or as low as -40. If a person with a severe state of mental stress were to suddenly be in the brain and body of a scholastic achiever, it would feel to them exactly the same as if they were on a large dose of cocaine. But to each person, their standard dopamine experience level gives them their familiarity, from which they shape their expectations and beliefs surrounding what human life is.

That level is quantifiable by the amount of released dopamine a person has relative to the amount of work which their brain is trying to accomplish. The work which a brain is trying to accomplish is not visible by outward appearance, as a brain which is engaging more work than it has dopamine for will throttle, and become stuck. And the experience to the person will be as though they are stagnant, like they don't know what they think or feel about things, and like they can't reach what they sense within their own mind. And their outward appearance can be anything, often appearing as though non-motivated or lazy, when in fact their brain simply doesn't have the dopamine to press upward against the weight of the work that is sitting in its pipelines.

d)

Even though people from all dispositions use a term of stress at various times to describe their state, it is referring to completely distinct considerations, depending upon whom it is being spoken by. A person for whom a +10 dopamine experience level is their consistent normal, will call experiencing a temporary reduction to a +5 dopamine experience level as stress, while a person for whom a +40 dopamine experience level is normal, someone like a typical doctor, will call their exposure to mere +30 dopamine experience level "stressful", and start to expect all kinds of pampering and become unwilling to exert themselves further on anyone's behalf except for their own.

And then, quite often, that doctor will unflinchingly suggest, opine, or assert that someone who feels hopeless and and undeserving of help from people while they are stuck in dopamine experience level of -5, which is the only experience they know of, is an abuser of drugs, which, when they use, might only elevate their dopamine experience level to a mere +2. The real abuse of drugs in these instances is the doctor using their dopamine to impose a false, hypocritical, and harmful determination upon a person who is innocent of what they are accused of.

And, further, doctors will place all kinds of burdens upon the most destitute of people, for them to pursue as their treatment, which they would never consider subjecting themselves to, if the relative work weight were put forth before them. They would balk at it, aghast, as if the proposition were monstrously inhumane and completely irreverent of their person.

As an example, think of the eye-opener of simulated extreme labour pains that some women feel, being given to men. Likewise, doctors have no experience to reference that would make them capable assessors of what is appropriate for mental stress ailment sufferers to be treated with. People are only able to succeed scholastically, to possibly become doctors, due to having a level of dopamine released and available within their brains that makes them entirely virgin and non-relating to the experiences of those suffering mental stress ailments. A doctor has typically never come even close to conceiving what the reality is for people with dopamine deficiency - and their doctrines surrounding dopamine and mental stress treatment are direct reflections of their lack of comprehension and qualification.

The doctors of today, whose doctrine is self-aggrandizing and serves them far more than those they impose it upon, fulfill the role of the Pharisees in Jesus' day: "For they bind heavy burdens, which are grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers."

So, what constitutes as a "high" to a person with a low standard dopamine experience level is actually viewed as a state of stress to one with a high standard dopamine experience level. A scholastically-achieving person, without any mental stress, is very 'high' 24/7, relative to a person suffering a mental stress ailment. But to both of them, their experience will be the only one that they are familiar with, and this leads to people from all dispositions using the same terms while meaning entirely incompatible concepts, without them realizing it.

ii.

Whenever a doctor tells a person that drugs are not an answer, or not a good answer, it is a tell-tale sign that that doctor is the typical institutional fact-regurgitating hack, and has no truthful connectivity in their brain between the considerations which their perceived facts bear upon one another.

Even when counselling is an answer, even when taking a walk is an answer, even when taking a few days of rest is an answer, drugs are still an inalienable part of all those answers, due to the impacts those things have on the drug levels in the person's brain: Directly or indirectly, drugs are a part of the answer.

The human brain is a massive drug bath, and a human will not get from state A to state B apart from engaging a manipulation of the drugs swilling in their brain. And while it can be laborious, long-term, and possibly futile to get that manipulation through available indirect avenues, the same difference can be fulfilled in moments, or in a relatively short period of time, by directly engaging the brain’s drug adjustment requirements.

Drugs are never an answer all on their own, as they supply a brain with its needed considerations to do its work, but they are always a part of the answer, perhaps even the only part that is missing, as they serve to enable and facilitate movement towards the considerations that mean a person’s complete healing – which is movement that is largely unavailable and non-manageable for a person apart from extraneous drug use, as is made evident by the fact that mental stress ailments actually still exist in society after over 100 years of their scientific study.

If doctors can convince people that drugs are not the answer, or not a good answer, then they set themselves up as benefactors to profit off of people’s perpetual illnesses, because drugs are always going to be a primary component to every human health answer. And the people who are convinced that drugs are not an answer are going to perpetually require assistance so long as they avoid the root causes of their issue.

If a person doesn't like having cracked lips, a dry throat, a head-ache, or discomfort permeating their entire body due to dehydration, their options are to either drink water to prevent and resolve those unfavourable conditions, or otherwise endure the outcomes of being insufficiently hydrated. Like-wise, if a person doesn't like having depression, anxiety, psychosis, schizophrenia, bi-polarity, and doesn't like being vulnerable to PTSD, alzheimer's, parkinson's, and a host of other dopamine deficiency-emergent ailments... and also if they also don't like having their potential in life bottle-necked, and them never reaching the level of accomplishment which they see and know is possible, then they can either take control of, and learn to become responsible for their brain and body's natural dynamic dopamine requirements, or otherwise endure the outcomes of not having sufficiently accepted, or tended to their body's fundamental dopamine needs.

A person does not enter into those non-favourable states, apart from having less than optimally tended to their dopamine and consideration needs.

iii.

As I have said, those who call themselves doctors and scientists have done all things wrong. Scientists mock homeopathy and other “new-age” approaches as being fantasy, and call them harmful by way of causing a person to not seek more appropriate health treatment - but doctors and scientists espouse and perform all the exact same air-headedness when they tell and attempt to convince people that drugs are not an answer, or not the answer, or not a good answer. And when scientists and doctors do so, they commit the far greater offence, because, in an act of mental abuse, and in arrogance, they impose their harmful and ignorant determinations upon others, rather than simply exercising domain over their own body by making those choices for themselves.

The only reason a doctor is even in the position to be able to try to convince another person to not view drugs as a solution (though they assuredly have always been) is because the doctor already has enough of the same drugs released available in their brain to keep them out of the afflicted states of the people they might say such things to. So, anyone telling another human that drugs are not an answer is firstly telling that person an ignorant and harmful falsehood, but is also being an egregious hypocrite, as much as there ever was.

No human ever resolved a health issue apart from the engagement drugs, because the physical human body is drug-based, and a continual orgy of drugs for as long as it remains alive - and its life is dependent upon it.

iv.

By the way, considering is movement, and anything which engages consideration is provoking movement, and changing the form of a state – and the difference between any two states is a defined set of considerations. And the state of consideration in a person is the state of their brain-wiring, which directs health or sickness, which delivers capacity to overcome or vulnerability. When a person receives the necessary consideration to improve their state via something that may be classified as homeopathy, or new-age, which they would not have otherwise engaged, then that homeopathy or new-ageness thing would have indeed served as cure. The extent to which this can be productive has never been known by institutional medicine, but everything unfurls into consideration, and there are no limits to what can be done via considering.

But the ability for a human brain to consider exists in an environment of it having ample dopamine availability.

Shrapnel

There is No Such Thing as Too Much Dopamine as an Ailment

i.

Serving as an example of another perfect inaccuracy in medical attribution, there exist recommendations of lowering dopamine to deal with certain behavioural issues, such as impulsive behaviour, including addiction - neither of which are caused by having too much dopamine, but by the connectivity of a brain having considered in a manner, or been collapsed into a manner, which guides behaviour down such avenues. The high dopamine is caused by the low consideration - and not the impulsiveness (which is a product of low consideration) caused by high dopamine.

Diverting attention from the actual root causes of those behaviours, which is the consideration that guides them, to dopamine, has deadly repercussions for millions of people around the world, and creates an atmosphere of ignorance that prevents truthful physiological understanding arising so that and real and positive resolutions can be had.

ii.

Considering is the work of a brain that requires dopamine, and which forms the connections in a brain that guide a person's behaviour - and well-considered connectivity is what normalizes a brain.

A person who has reduced normalization in their brain by making determinations can be vulnerable to impulsive tendencies, and may also have a surplus of dopamine availability from reducing the amount of work their brain is doing. The issue there isn't too much dopamine, but a lack of connection-forming consideration to make use of the dopamine that's available - and this state is called being a sociopath / psychopath.

When a person has impulsive tendencies (which can occur where there is dopamine deficiency as well), the sickness is not the dopamine that is available, but the manner in which the person has considered their mind. Dopamine doesn't make a person impulsive anyway - it is what gives a person all their control over their mind, and their potential for the mental work that is considering. And what they consider will develop the pathway that will guide their behaviours.

It is not justified, or appropriate to blame dopamine availability for particular people's behaviour, and then restrict everyone's access to dopamine so that hundreds of millions of mental stress sufferers are tortured and exploited, just so that sociopaths and psychopaths do not need to admit to and confront their personal flaws and selfishness.

As it is, the people with the problems inside of themselves are the ones designating institutional ailments and treatments. They're saying that any number of innocent people need to suffer and be denied their deserved cure, so that they can continue being well-comforted while playing out a facade.

In an act of ultimate irresponsibility, they are imposing the penalty of their own guilt onto people who have done nothing wrong. And they profit heavily as the main benefactors from the torture it causes those people, both financially, and in ill-gained reputations within society as carers of people - whose problems they are the cause of, as well as obstructions to the needed cure, as if profiteering off the suffering of others is the sociopath's reward for ensuring that the suffering persists.

Now that I have elucidated the matter and corrected the attribution of fault in an impulsive person from dopamine to a lack of sound consideration, there is no longer justification for withholding the proper treatment from those who need it. Sociopaths need to learn to consider, and people with mental stress need powerful dopamine increases.

iii.

If a person has impulsive tendencies, then it isn't directly because of dopamine in any way. Though if a person has allowed pathways to consider which cause impulsiveness, having dopamine available will have a role in helping enable those pathways to be engaged. But having dopamine available is also what will enable it to be corrected by considering - a person cannot make one change in their brain, for good or bad, apart from having available dopamine.

Addressing an issue by clamping down dopamine is only masking the problem, and is not addressing it at its root. And thinking of dopamine reduction as a tool to avoid the problem has very harmful, including deadly consequences for millions of people who require increased dopamine to be healthy and in control of their lives.

Decreasing dopamine is not a solution to anything, and is running away from personal responsibility. And it is only even conjectured to be a solution because those who suggest it are only personally familiar with having a consistent high level of dopamine, and with no alternate experience to contrast their own with, they are left egregiously unfamiliar with dopamine's actual effect and importance - and this makes the things that they propose and impose on other people based in ignorance and hypocrisy.

A person who is familiar with dopamine is not going to choose to lower it to address any specific problem, because lowering it will reduce the capability and quality of a great many things. Lowering dopamine only stands a chance to reduce impulsive behaviour by reducing work potential of a brain enough so that there's no extra capability to engage considerations further than basic awareness. Awareness itself will be decreased, as will positive experience of senses, critical thinking capability, creative expression, visual depth perception, aural articulation, energy, and more.

Lowering dopamine lowers a person's capability to experience, perceive, and engage life, and lowering dopamine to address a particular behavioural problem would be like a person responding to having a messy home by having their sight, smell, and touch disabled so that they don't encounter their messy home's unpleasantness, rather that tending to the mess by cleaning it up.

Lowering dopamine is avoiding a problem, rather than dealing with it, and it is a selfish approach because it also encourages the continued victimization of many people who are being denied the dopamine they fundamentally require to be healthy, and to experience and enjoy life.

Shrapnel

Adendum - Migraines are Dopamine Deficiency - and also: The Importance of Tact in Dopaminergic Application - and also: The Importance of Considering the Truth

Related post: Just a Tip (Regarding news of genetic mutations being responsible for such or such a condition)


i.

Oh, and it should go without saying, but migraines are also a product of there being insufficient dopamine for a brain to handle work that is processing through it, and, yes, sufficiently increasing dopamine availability relative to other things will alleviate a migraine - but try to not also increase adrenaline and noradrenaline at the same time, because that would be counter-productive, and could exacerbate part of the migraine.

To do this is to treat the dopamine deficiency symptom at its root and source. To do anything other is to either be in denial of one's real problem, or to be self-spiting of one's own human being.

The pain of a migraine is a part of a brain's voice, and it is crying in anguish precisely for dopamine, which it essentially needs. Does a person ignore a baby that is screaming in pain if there is some anomaly afflicting it? Why would they act so inhumanely towards their very own brain, leaving it in a state of torture while it tries to do good work for the person? Such is an ultimate irresponsibleness and self-spitefulness. A person who cannot come to grips with the state of being a human is not worthy of being one, and is a danger to themselves, and a harmful influence within society.



ii.

But in all dopaminergic application, tact is all-mattering. Robin Williams, someone who endured various dopamine deficiency ailments, and took cocaine, and yet in the end wasn't helped by it, would be a text-book example of how not to pursue dopaminergism, if the knowledge to develop an understanding of these things to be put into a book had been pursued by any in the previous century, instead of engaging the quintessential sociopathic conduct of insisting sentiment-base determinations to people, to lying to people about the nature of dopamine and dopaminergics and building walls of propaganda and indoctrinating doctors using institutional falsehoods to turn them into agents of fallacy.

Robin Williams could have straight-forwardly been cured of his Parkinson's, anxiety, and depression using cocaine. He, too, was a victim of institutional misinformation on drugs, and of those who perpetuate that misinformation.

One of the most essential things to avoid in dopaminergic application is any sense that it is wrong to take these drugs, however a person feels they would like to take them. Regardless of whether a person harbours insecurities about increasing their dopamine, their brain still fundamentally depends on, and operates on dopamine. When a person is insecure about taking cocaine, or other dopaminergic, which is only from a century of false messaging by doctors, scientists, and government, that uncertainty and worry is a belief held by consideration, which is represented as synaptic connections within their brain.

Considerations have polarity, and receive their identity as relative to one another. And such a belief aligns certain considerations in a negative manner, and for as long as it evaluates as True towards the activity a person is engaging in, all signals relating to that activity will pass through that consideration, and receive an antagonistic influence, a quantum of negative consideration-value, which can infect the whole mind. And increasing adrenaline and noradrenaline will accelerate the considering of those things that are worries, and progressively amplify the presence of negative consideration-value in the brain until a time when things settle down and they can be reconsidered into normalcy. This is where drug-induced anxiety and psychosis come from - there is nothing inherent in the drugs taken themselves that cause these things, but it is a contagion created by doctors, scientists, and government, out of their sociopathic inclinations to attempt to justify their own statuses by demeaning and harming those of others, who they deem as targets for their prejudice.



iii.

All anti-drug propaganda bears a negative consideration-value within society, and the accrued negative consideration-value in society because of the previous century of anti-drug propaganda is tremendous, and it has killed many people, and has destroyed many families.

Despite its awful influence in society, every human being's brain and body still fundamentally runs on the things people have been taught to be scared by - and much unfortunate drug behaviour is no different than a you girl who is abused by their parents, being told she's a worthless slut who won't amount to anything, growing up to become a promiscuous and alcoholic vagrant (though these individual activities, if done within their control and awareness, and by their own choosing, would not be wrong). Such a person is not a statement against the harms of the alcohol or drugs they may use, but delivers an indictment against those who delivered to her the hateful messaging which considered through her, shaping the neurological pathways that guide her behaviour.

It is the same with negative drug usage patterns in society - none of them were caused by drugs, themselves, but were created by scientists, doctors, and governments, who then profit from their existence, and use them as false-justification to further the messaging that created them in the first place.

In the end, the Truth itself will require there to be full justice for those who were unfairly subjected to and manipulated by anti-drug propaganda, and who received mistreatment at the hands of those those who peddled that propaganda.



iv.

Also, ironically, when anti-drug propaganda is being administered to a society, there is a growth in sociopathism within that society, and a reduction in intelligence within that society, and the harms put into children and teenagers are those very ones which anti-drug propaganda would have them think come from drugs: Considering is the mechanism behind evolution, and a brain develops its connections through the course of considering. Those connections themselves represent the considerations of a person's mind, and greater Truth is manifest the more considerations are accounted for within an environment - and considerations which resolve into one form concepts. A determination is like a road-block that prevents considering from occurring - and the more determinations held in a mind, the less presence of truth there is in that mind, and the more selfish and sociopathic it is likely to be.

Anti-drug propaganda is not based in truth, but in sentiment-based determinations, disseminated and practised by truth-lacking sociopaths - and its influence is killing of the mind of society, and creating of all kinds of diseases. Conversely, taking many of the drugs anti-drug propaganda frightens people away from commonly greatly improves a healthy development of mind, and fortifies both physical and mental health.

So when anti-drug propaganda told people "this is your brain on drugs", that imagery and message was, in truth, what was being done to the brain of every person who believed that message. While the drugs they were being warned against did and do the opposite - they provide a person with the physio-fuel that makes them healthier, smarter, and more capable for good (though to use it is a person's choice). As I've said, a determination is a falsehood by nature, which reduces consideration (a consideration being a quantum of truth, and a quantum of mind), and which aligns a person's considerations antithetically to the truth.

Doctors and scientist and governments have brain-washed people into being scared of the very thing that cures them - and so they are made to suffer all kinds of artificially-created ailments. But in the end, just as in the beginning, the human brain effectively runs on the effect of cocaine, which is actually literally good by nature. And if a person is encountering an issue within themselves, particularly within their mind, the effect of cocaine would be a reliably good place to start addressing it, as a first recourse. It is good, normal, and healthy for a person to use drugs which they recognize by their own judgement as contributing positively inside of themselves - and no one on the outside is capable of casting a judgement over that.

The Truth is real, and cannot be determined, but can only come to be known by being considered.


Continued in this post: Regarding Cocaine's Applicability for Treating Migraines (2nd Addendum)

Shrapnel

Article: What Causes Autism?

Article: What Causes Autism?


Well, just as medications which alleviate symptoms of depression, anxiety, psychosis, tend to increase dopamine, so also do medications which alleviate symptoms of autism tend to increase dopamine. This all makes sense, since increasing available dopamine increases healthy development in a brain, while lack of dopamine leads to all types of mental stress ailments, general health problems, and impoverished brain development. So I would venture that autism, a development issue, is caused by a pregnant woman experiencing dopamine deficiency during their pregnancy, at least in some regions of their brain.

If so, then addressing the problem at its root would be to increase dopamine during pregnancy, to avoid unwanted development issues.

Of course, having more dopamine leads to improved health and development in general, while lacking dopamine means a greater vulnerability to health issues in general, and impoverished development in specific:
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2016/01/articles-poverty-may-alter-wiring-of.html
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2015/12/articles-stress-could-increase-risk-of.html
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2015/09/managing-and-increasing-dopamine-can.html
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2015/12/am-eclectic-assortment-of-articles.html
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2015/12/a-few-more-for-eclectic-assortment-of.html


And use of cocaine during pregnancy is shown to improve fetus development:
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/24283537_Prenatal_cocaine_increases_dendritic_spine_density_in_cortical_and_subcortical_brain_regions_of_the_rat


Also, cocaine, whose effect is to increase dopamine's availability while inhibiting adrenaline's release, delivers literally the antithetical influence as schizophrenia on brain development, boosting growth in the region associated with learning and memory, and like all dopaminergics, including the "smart drug" modafinil, enhancing a brain's capabilities (which would be relevant to enhancing fetus development):
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17641875
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2016/01/articles-study-suggests-genetics-could.html


And the myth of crack babies, babies being born with issues do to their mother using crack during their pregnancy, has appropriately been debunked:
http://articles.philly.com/2013-07-22/news/40709969_1_hallam-hurt-so-called-crack-babies-funded-study
http://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Family/2013/0725/Crack-baby-development-issues-not-side-effect-of-drug-but-poverty
http://www.businessinsider.com/crack-baby-myth-debunked-2013-7
http://www.salon.com/2013/07/23/longterm_study_debunks_myth_of_the_crack_baby/


It may well be that the very best thing for a pregnant woman to do to prevent health issues for their child, while fortifying their child's development, is put aside time to relax and smoke crack, or to take cocaine, while in their pregnancy.


But medical research cannot be relied upon to inform a public concerning this, because all scientific research, and particularly drug and health research, is egregiously biased, contrived, and unreliable, with at least (I will clarify this in another post) 60% of researchers publishing biased, and therefore False information as conclusions. And when it comes to drug research, I think virtually all conclusions are slanted (and therefore directing away from the truth). I would even say that a medical researcher is, by default, in the position of being an unreliable witness, since they, their field, and their funding providers stand to benefit from falling short of delivering real solutions (and this is a recipe for disaster in Reward-oriented mindsets, who are also sociopathic by nature, and therefore predisposed to being untruthful):
http://www.nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248

Particularly when it comes to drug and health research:
http://www.bmj.com/content/349/bmj.g7015

Which requires government license to study, and governments are not that likely to approve research which they don't like the objectives of, particularly when there is a history of such research being shut down, to go alongside with a history of such research delivering fabricated, or conniving conclusions:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/jun/13/bad-science-cocaine-study
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2016/01/looking-at-instance-of-deliberately.html
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2014/08/response-to-cocaine-study-bearing.html


I would put forth that 90%+ of what is read as health research is not true at all, and is either wilfully directed, or conducted by people who are sociopathic, who cannot arrive at unbiased conclusions because they have corrupted the connectivity in their brain that gives a person their perception - with the inter-connectivity between all considerations substantiating what is being what manifests truth.


Related post: Cocaine Use During Pregnancy Can Prevent Autism

Shrapnel

Articles: Stress could increase the risk of cognitive impairment preceding Alzheimer's & How to help someone with depression

First Article: Stress could increase the risk of cognitive impairment preceding Alzheimer's, study finds

Once again, those who call themselves scientists make a mere observation without any connection to its meaning, while I have already produced its full comprehension from start to finish. And how many times has that happened now?


"The findings aren't saying that stress itself causes Alzheimer's, but rather that it's a risk factor for amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), a less severe but still noticeable decline in cognitive abilities that sometimes develops into Alzheimer's"


I've already stated that Alzheimer's is a Mental Stress emergent ailment, and identified those "mild cognitive impairment" symptoms as result of there being insufficient released Dopamine to produce a full awareness.

As a Mental Stress state is left untended do, connections can buckle under the pressure and make a mess of the brain.

It takes one quantity of dopamine to make a series of considerations which have reasoned into one evaluate as True. If that series of considerations breaks, it then takes as many quantities of dopamine as there are pieces to that circuit to gather all its information - and then more dopamine to do the work that assembles whatever meaning they're needed to provide within the context by which they're being called for.

A brain whose Dopamine supply is increasingly burdened is going to portray a diminishing awareness.

It takes having sufficient released Dopamine to prevent things from breaking within the brain, and also to mend it after things have broken, while increasing Adrenaline will only serve to agitate the wearing within a stressed brain.


"the good news is that now we know about this link between stress and aMCI, it could help us to focus efforts on reducing stress as we get older and perhaps figure out ways that can better reduce the incidence of this occasional precursor to full-blown Alzheimer's"

It's called Dopamine. Instances of Mental Stress and its emergent ailments only exist in society because of the influence of sociopaths, particularly those working in the field of mental health.

The only obstacle to universal mental health on this planet are the sociopaths who are directing mental health treatment, who cannot possibly do what is right or make a good judgement because a consideration is a quantum of truth and a quantum of mind, and is exactly what a sociopath is lacking.

A person of lesser consideration cannot evaluate the situation of a person of greater consideration, and the considerations which factor into the state of a person of greater considerations are as if invisible to the person of lesser consideration.

"The good news is stress is treatable – which could delay or even prevent pre-dementia"

I've already said that Mental Stress is Dopamine Deficiency, and that 100% of Mental Stress instances are preventable - including all its emergent ailments.



On a related note, remember this article?: Caffeine could limit damage of chronic stress

And why I've said that, yes, caffeine can assist against Mental Stress?:

"Caffeine is a dopaminergic, like crack cocaine, and therefore of course it can reduce stress, and of course it also reduces memory impairment, as the article also notes. Memory formation and recollection is automatic when there is dopamine enough to accomplish it. When a person focuses to practice memorization, it is because they have limited released dopamine within their brain, and by focusing they are prioritizing its allocation. If a person's brain is absolutely flooded with dopamine, they can learn a new spoken language, from scratch to competent speaking level, every week - and effortlessly."


The effect of Dopamine within the human brain is profoundly simple: think of a light-dimmer, where turning it down decreases every positive capability of the brain, while turning it up increases every positive capability of the brain. That's really it, and the nature of Dopamine being Physio-Fuel, and a quantum of work potential for the brain, the means by which the human brain accomplishes all work.

Caffeine is not a particularly great dopaminergic to treat Mental Stress with, and can exacerbate stress conditions. It also has a very low ceiling of headroom. The best means to treat Mental Stress with is cocaine, as its effect of proficiently increasing Dopamine while significantly inhibiting Adrenaline is the "miracle cure", "holy grail", etc for the human brain. It is also a very healthy natural molecule to take, and in comparison licensed medications are practically straight poisons, designed not to cure, but to lock ailments in place for as long as possible, liquidating the person's life for the sake of capitalism.

Dopamine and Cocaine prevent and cure, but doctors, science, and institutional medicine can do nothing, and their whole doctrine is embedded in sociopathic thinking, being completely False as a whole. They never had the truth in them to be able to speak or administer it.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Second Article: How to help someone with depression


All the experiences mentioned in this article are simply the consequence to there being low released dopamine within a brain.

Sense of positive meaning is produced by considerations (represented as synaptic connections within a brain) evaluating True in relation to a person's life. It takes Dopamine for a consideration to evaluate True. If a person lacks released Dopamine, they will lack the capability to experience positive meaning.

A person's capability to do things is produced by signals assembling and passing within their brain. That can't happen apart from there being enough Dopamine to handle whichever tasks are put forth down the brain's pipelines. And the nature of considering, which is what all signals are doing as they transmit down the brain's pathways, is that considerations are polar, and cannot be stopped once they've started - they'll need to consider to a resolution one way or another, or otherwise their information will clog up a person's brain. Lacking Dopamine to accomplish the things which a brain is trying to accomplish will result in lethargy, cloud-headedness, irritation, and can include a host of other things.


In the linked-to article, the author says that the best thing to do for a person who is experiencing this Dopamine Deficiency-induced state is to just sit there and listen.

The reason why is inherent in what I've already said: The information within a person's brain is not static, but moves from one consideration to another, and it is constantly considering forward. The only reason a depressed person cannot overcome the state they are in is because they have no more free dopamine to move consider the information within their brain forward until positive resolution. Their brain has received too much of a workload for their Dopamine availability to handle, and consequently, their brain has log-jammed, and can no perceive where to go next, or render as True and open the next consideration that will move the held information forward.

When a person listens to the Dopamine-deficient person's held information, their presence is supplying the consideration that enables information to move forward: Reason's principle applies to the person's perception and within their brain, and the understanding within the depressed person that their considerations are being heard relieves the depressed person's brain, freeing up some dopamine, which immediately goes towards assisting considering their information forward.

Of course, whether a person's listening is helpful or not is dependent upon what their listening means to the person who is depressed.

It is also possible for the person listening to become conduit for the log-jammed information within the depressed person, and help consider forward to resolution.



So there are two elements to depression, which are the considerations that are bearing a specific meaning within a person's brain, and there being a lack of released dopamine to handle the brain's mechanical capability to consider information towards a positive resolution.

It is likewise for all Mental Stress ailment: there is the held consideration that is responsible for the state, and there is the aspect of a brain being able to consider that information to positive resolution, which is accomplished with dopamine. And of course, a person must choose to engage considering, but Dopamine is what first grants a brain the potential to consider, and to control its considering, and therefore to function.


A related post: How Careless Words Trigger a Depression





All of these are simple problems, and problems that were created by the sociopathism-based doctrine which those calling themselves scientists concocted through their blind observation.

Dopamine is to being mental health as water is to being hydration. It's that simple. The real issue is that people who don't particularly do a lot of work with their brains (considering is a brain's work, and requires dopamine to accomplish), and therefore have ample surplus dopamine are the ones who succeed in academia, because the organization of academia is also tailored to rewarding sociopathic brains, while being an incompatible obstacle for truthful brains.

The fact memorization required for academia is effortless when a brain has lots of free dopamine, and having lots of dopamine is indicative of shallow considering. Also, the information presented in academia is incompatible with a considering brain, because it is False, and a considering brain works all details into their congruous state, and that can't be done with academic information, which is many disparate details that don't add up. And as I've said, the more pieces of disparate information a brain tries to hold at once to work with, the more dopamine is required. Socipathic brains don't hold all the disparate pieces of information to consider them into one body of information, they instead accept them as disparate pieces of information, and memorize them as facts, and then go on to mistreat others by holding to these facts as their doctrine, and as if they had something in common with truth.

But the only constant of Science is that every thing declared to be A Scientific Fact has been replaced before, and will be replaced again. It is impossible for Science to ever produce a truth, and is only a tool for sociopaths.

Shrapnel

Article: Coffee Might Help You Live Longer - and Other Things of Meaning

Article: Coffee Might Help You Live Longer

Yes, coffee can help a person live longer, and protect them from many ailment conditions, because it increases dopamine-availability, and dopamine is the means by which a brain accomplishes work. Conversely, depression, anxiety, psychosis, schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, etc... all Mental Stress stems from insufficient released dopamine within a person's brain relative to the work that is trying to be considered by that brain. Cocaine, meth, crack, and many other dopaminergic substances can make a person live longer, too, even moreso than coffee.

I elucidated this first, in this post: Managing and Increasing Dopamine Can Easily Add Years to a Person's Life and Good Health

And a person who drinks coffee is equal to a person who smokes crack cocaine, in that both of them are seeking the increase in dopamine, and both of their brains fundamentally run on that very dopamine, and both of their brains benefit from that dopamine's release. There is no difference in that each of them seeks dopamine, and there is no difference in what that dopamine means to their brains.


And once again, in the above linked-to article, someone exercising Science made a mere observation within a ridiculously compartmentalized framework of being about coffee, without any understanding of its meaning (because their observation is without the knowing that comes from all considerations being inter-connected), while I had already provided the complete comprehension of the far greater reality of it all.



Another instance of everything playing out in such a manner is here: Article: Increased brain connectivity eases teenage impatience



And another is here: Can you think yourself into a different person?

While I've said all along that a brain wires and re-wires itself according to how a person considers, that a person can heal themselves of all things by belief and considering, and that a gene is a concept which considered and acceded to certainty within a person. And also that belief comes before possibility, that belief creates context between considerations, that they can be considered into one state, and that a mind is always considering towards its greatest belief.



A similar instance is here: There is Only One Truth, and It is Acting in All Things and at All Levels

... where I said "Truth is one consideration passing its full self to another without force nor resistance".

That, compared to the state of what is being perceived here: Scientists have discovered a new state of matter, called 'Jahn-Teller metals'

You could call that moment of transition in matter the 'moment of truth', where one consideration passes itself to another, causing a change in state of them both.



And there are many other such examples, some which I have made noted, and others I have not. Many things will still be merely observed by those who call themselves scientists only after I have already spoken the truth of them, and other things which before have been seemingly observed, I will speak of, having already known the full truth of them. It is and will be the same regarding all people who speak from Reason, in which all considerations are as one, and where all considerations add up to one eternal moment.



Science is fulfillment of the granfalloon - which is a meaningless association of people.

Run, it's Science!

As meaning is the product of the inter-connecting of considerations, and meaning cannot come be known through Science, because Science is the practice of making determinations based upon observation - and a determination is a falsehood by nature because it is made independently of connectivity between considerations which substantiate a thing's truth, and falsifies an outcome by short-circuiting considering. When two people speak the same words, one by a determination and the other by holding its knowing in consideration, the one who speaks by a determination speaks a falsehood, while the one who speaks from the substantiation delivered to them by considering a thing's truth speaks the truth, and only as they hear from the truth. And so the truth is speaking through that person.

A determination puts up walls between considerations, which keeps them from communicating and contributing towards a full and truthful resolution.

And the truth can only come to be known by considering all things to completion - and once all things are completed in considering, they will resolve themselves, because the truth Is - and Reason will experience, where all considerations are as one, manifesting the truth, and producing mind. And the knowing of all those considerations will be gained by the one who considered their truth.


Since is a jalopy tool of sociopaths, and it creates sociopathism with a brain and within society. And institutional medical doctrine is fraud of the most lethal kind, and is responsible for more avoidable death and suffering than almost any other source in the history of humankind.

A century of scientist conceived, endorsed, and enforced drug prohibition has killed more people than the previous century of warfare, while the truth is converse to what doctors and scientists would speak - many currently-illicit drugs can be exceptionally healthy for a person to take, far moreso beyond anything a doctor has license to provide - and a person only lives every next moment of their life from the very things which those drugs cause the greater release of acting within their brain. And a person's experience, work capability, and potential success is produced through the presence and activity of those things. Mental Stress is only the lack of natural cocaine within a person's brain, and its cure is to saturate the brain with that cocaine, the same which is released in healthier form than natural by taking real cocaine, which itself is natural.

But as I've said, what a person does while providing themselves with greater dopamine release is just as important as that they do so - and also the manner in which a greater release of dopamine is delivered can change the direction of outcome for some cases of Mental Stress ailment (a general and incomplete description of the baseline goal being to push dopamine as much as safely possible, while keeping epinephrine / norepinephrine stationary).


And to those practicing science, do not abandon the considerations you engage in work, but consider them to resolution, not by separating considerations through making determinations, but by taking all things into account so that all considerations are made equal: Every valley shall be raised up, every mountain and hill made low; the rough ground shall become level, the rugged places a plain.

There is far greater means to learn, discover, and understand than this world as a whole has yet known, which I have been making known and will continue to make known.

Shrapnel