Article: Asthma drugs may reduce Parkinson’s risk (yet another lap around the same track)

Article: Asthma drugs may reduce Parkinson’s risk



i.

This isn't a mystery, and it shares the same explanation as a great multitude of other ailment-medication responses: Clenbuterol increases dopamine, and dopamine is the human brain's work fuel, and is what it uses to connect information across synapses. Any time dopamine is being increased, a brain's work capacity is being increased, and any time dopamine is reduced, a brain's capacity for work is reduced and stress is increased. Mental stress is merely a lack of dopamine availability within a brain relative to the amount of work a brain is trying to do, and is comparable to dehydration being a lack of water, and asphyxiation being a lack of oxygen.

Depression, anxiety, psychosis, ADHD, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, schizophrenia... they all emerge from the state of stress that is dopamine deficiency, and they can all be effectively treated, even cured, by increasing dopamine while inhibiting adrenergic influence. The interrupted fetus development that is autism is again a case of insufficient dopamine availability within a pregnant mother, and autistic child-births can also be prevented by ensuring dopamine levels are high enough relative to other things in a pregnant mother.

Relatedly, what is called the placebo effect is positive belief reducing the micro states of uncertainty and worrying (those things causing considering in a brain, which is the work of a brain for which dopamine is required), which reduces the work in a brain, which frees up dopamine availability for a brain, which consequently leads to improved health.

Most dopaminergics have an unfavourable adrenergic influence alongside their positive dopaminergic influence, and increasing adrenergic influence worsens stress states. However, cocaine is one dopaminergic which does inhibit adrenergic response, and is excellent at inhibiting adrenergic response while greatly increasing dopamine availability within a brain.

In fact, when applied with understanding, it is possible to flush a severe and long-existing psychosis from a person in just a mere couple of hours, or less, using pure cocaine.



ii.

And don't forget Schizophrenia:

Exhibit A) Study Suggests Genetics Could Be The Root Cause Of Schizophrenia

"The findings may help explain the longstanding mystery of why brains from people with schizophrenia tend to have a thinner cerebral cortex with fewer synapses than unaffected individuals do," said a press statement from the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, whose experts took part in the study.

This is the brain's outer layer, often referred to as grey matter, involved in learning and memory."


Exhibit B) Mice Fed with Cocaine Show Growth in Brain Areas Linked with Learning, Memory

Looks like we have a match!


It's also the same reason why Methylene Blue helps against Alzheimer's, why coffee does the same and can help a person to live longer, why Modafinil is a "smart drug", why teenagers who lack what fuels a person's working memory capabilities end up using dopaminergic drugs while simplifying life helps prevent future mental illness, why poverty has the effect on people that it does, and why a million other dopaminergics help against a million dopamine-deficiency ailments:

An Eclectic Assortment of Articles, Which All Receive Resolution by Understanding Dopamine

A Few More for: An Eclectic Assortment of Articles...

The Third Entry Into "An Eclectic Assortment of Articles, Which All Receive Resolution by Understanding Dopamine"


It's all one thing - same cause, same solution.



iii.

Dopamine is only "reward" to a sociopath, who, because of their low consideration, associates the increased dopamine availability they experience from doing the types of things which they have determined to indicate that they are good little dogs as being a confirmation of their good little dogginess. This understanding is an inversion of the truth. What's actually happening is the same thing as happens with placebo:

"positive belief reducing the micro states of uncertainty and worrying (those things causing considering in a brain, which is the work of a brain for which dopamine is required), which reduces the work in a brain, which frees up dopamine availability for a brain, which consequently leads to improved health, cognitive strength, and positive feeling."


To someone that isn't a sociopath, dopamine is not "reward," or something that comes in the end, but physio-fuel, and what is required to be there in the beginning for proper and intended functionality, and for proficient and healthy development. To human physiology, it is the god-molecule.


Conventional medicine is firstly about ideology and profit, and not truth. The truth is that an enormous host of illnesses, particularly mental illnesses, all only emerge and branch from mental stress, which itself is simply a lack of dopamine availability in a brain relative to the amount of work that brain is trying to accomplish.

And much research that is done concerning related topics is primarily about the researcher seeking to experience peer-approved "reward" for conforming to and supporting a dogmatic ideology.


To sum the situation up from one angle: Institutional and academic medical doctrine is fake. It is the 21st century's equivalent of practising the four humours, and would only be more so if the four humours was a patented practice that earned its patent-holders money every time it was practised.



iv.

because it strips them of all the determinations they've used as justification for


Why do today's scientists revel in historical stories such as Galileo facing off against an institution of dogmatic ideologues who had all the evidence they were willing to consider to prove that Earth is the centre of the universe, when today's scientists are the same as the people Galileo faced off against?

And this is a pattern that has occurred throughout history: An individual person considers beyond conventions because of the greater belief they have within themselves, and by their consideration discovers new marvels that they then make known to everybody.

But all those who move by determinations oppose the greater consideration presented, because what is presented strips those people of all the determinations they've made to justify themselves, invalidating their prejudiced judgments, their perceptions of their statuses, their reputations as knowledgeable authorities...

In time, however, the greater truth become reinforced as indisputable, and then those whose truth is their determinations begin to make determinations about everything surrounding the new thing and begin turn it into an ideology, an institution, and a dogma. Then, sociopaths from all over flock to that thing and conform to it, not because they understand and know it, but because the appearance of consensus is what they take as truth. And they reinforce that thing with all kinds of extraneous infrastructures, and wave that thing all around as their "proof" of many other things, including why they're smarter than the dogmatic ideologues of history who did the same thing as they are doing - because now they have the right determination to conform to and invest their sentiments into.

But the truth is not a determination.



Related post: Addendum to the Previous Post about Parkinson's Receptibility to Dopamine, And Also Something of Psycheparous

Shrapnel

Looking at the Forms of Considerations and Reason Within the Human Brain, And Beyond

I came across this article today, mentioning the same subject as the article I linked-to in the previous blog post:

Brain Architecture: Scientists Discover 11 Dimensional Structures That Could Help Us Understand How the Brain Works


In that article there is this picture (click it to view the full size):

The right-side picture translates the structure of connections into geometric "architectural structures" (consideration structures) to show the organization of what the researchers don't understand but which I can tell you is the gathering of considerations into reasons to fulfill concepts, by way of considering and reasoning.









The representation picture on the right-side depicts some of what I drew up over a year ago:





... but which I have not started showing and explaining because I wanted to do it right, such as with an all-encompassing and clearly explained post, but I just haven't had the energy or calmness to pull it all together into the perfect explanation yet. But since some other people are starting to detect these things, I think this makes it pretty convenient and simple for me to just throw its explanation out along with what they've said - so I don't need to do as much to convince people that this is actually happening, or do that all on my own.



To start, I'll point this out:

Whatever model on the origin of this physical universe a person goes with, it comes down to this: interactions between things. More specifically, you might say they are interactions between the smallest pieces of things that could ever be.

Since these are the smallest of all pieces, not made up of multiple other small pieces, but each are the smallest, and only their one-dimensional thing - until they interact with another smallest-piece, at which point they gain the smallest piece of definition and become dimensional. And that 2-dimensional piece interacts with something else, and gains further quality.

If one smallest-piece interacts with another, it is a True evaluation, or a Yes.

As I said in this post: The Meaning of "Will > Considering > Reason" and Automatic Considering

"Truth is present only where there is context between Considerations. A lone Consideration lacks definition, value, meaning, purpose, and point - it has no Reason. All that a lone Consideration has is a choice: Yes, or No, to Consider another other than itself.

A choice of Yes or No becomes its Will.

Will is Absolute, and a blank canvas yielding the power of True to wherever it is allocated through its choice of Yes.

When a Will gives itself to the Considering of anything, it sacrifices its power of choice for the duration of the Considering, and its choice to Consider becomes the power of True for the other that receives Considering - and once Reason experiences, the relation formed by the bridging of the two bears a truth, and forms a new Consideration.

So in the end, the Considering experiences Reason and resolves."


And in this post: A Treatise of Existence

"A consideration starts with just a choice of Yes or No, to consider"


If considerations don't interact together, the communicated relationship between those considerations is as a No, or a False.

Just like everything you see on a computer screen is made up of 1s and 0s, which are gathered into what are called in computer programming "functions", which each add up to a single value, which is then "returned" or sent to the program and bears an influence upon it, it is the same with everything that is physically visible in the world: Considerations gather into concepts, which are to them reasons, and resolve into a single truth, which expresses a meaning to everything.

Everything that is happening in the world represents a movement of considerations as they are considering, and they are building forms and structures, where what looks like space between physical things actually shows no space between their considerations - and to make a change to the consideration structure somewhere will reliably result in an outcome for all other aspects of that consideration structure, even though they may not appear related or near to each other when looked at physically.



As smaller concepts interact together with similarly-sized (by volume of contained considerations) concepts, those full concepts can interact like two considerations interacting, and they can interact with more concepts, to reason together into greater concepts, with many more dimensions.

In fact, you exist in an environment made of considerations, and can only imagine or perceive something because its considerations exist to be engaged - and if they are reasoned, then that which was believed in will become real from the experience of the existence of the person who reasons it.

And as I said in this post: Considering & its Meaning

"... everything that is fully considered will find a new way to become True."


Your thoughts of things are referencing those things' considerations just like what is called a "pointer" in computer programming.

And every fully-reasoned concept can be communicated via a signal. In fact, this entire universe fits into a signal.


There is lots, perhaps everything more that I could say from there, but getting back to the article, it shows this representation image, which translates the structure of the information involved:


I can explain what it all represents.

The small pieces heading towards the large sphere are gatherings of considerations. Each point is a consideration, and the lines that connect them are the meaning they have to each other, which is context, and which is a bridge that is also made of considerations. They are held together by belief (which is a 'This Is' declaration, which invokes Reason to produce considering.

The large sphere to which they are drawn is a concept, and is a reason (referring to a different aspect of reason than before) awaiting its fulfillment. It is filled up with considerations based on the evaluation of truth, by reason, and the fulfilled concept adds up to one.

The smaller considerations are drawn into it by reasoning, which can communicate with all considerations that have truth in them across any distance, because they exist within each other.

As I said, "reasoning draws all considerations into itself" - or, herself.

And also, in the post Meaning for Psycheparous: Everything can be a portal to every other thing.



One the reason is fulfilled, it is all-True, and the information it adds up to can be converted into a signal and transferred throughout any other pathways, exerting influence upon all considerations and concepts which it evaluates as True to.


The research the article is about called those large spheres "cavities", but they are not. They are spaces filled with meaning, representing potential awaiting to be fulfilled. The unfilled spaces, which are what I was drawing with the dotted lines in these pictures:





They become filled with considerations - or, if a determination is made involving the reason that is an environment of considerations, it falsifies the concept or considering, and it fails to become fulfilled.

When Jesus said that he came to fulfill the law, the law is a concept, made of considerations, and he fulfilled that concept, so that it did not fail. Being fulfilled is not the same thing as no longer being in effect. It means it is in effect, in all the places that it is supposed to be.


One of the researchers, Ran Levi, says in the article: "The appearance of high-dimensional cavities when the brain is processing information means that the neurons in the network react to stimuli in an extremely organized manner. It is as if the brain reacts to a stimulus by building then razing a tower of multi-dimensional blocks..."

It is acting by Reason. There should be no surprise that it is all organized - everything is adding up perfectly, with no space between the meaning of the state of one consideration and the state of the next. The organization of considerations by truth and reason is perfection. Mathematics is accurate because it adheres to the same. I will show that at some point (as I said once already, here).


Everything you see everywhere is a manifestation of a form of considerations, that is similar to what has been displayed in the right-side representation picture from that article. I can explain much more of all of it, and hopefully I will, soon. I actually want to just not post for several months and then resume explaining when I am able to in a much more effective manner. But I see articles everywhere where people are not even recognizing what they are looking at, and it irks me into making a post, because I already know the full design of everything, which naturally includes everything that people are studying at making articles about.

And where scientists talk about ideas of space exploration, and fantasize about traveling to another planet or galaxy, I know how the relative distance between places can be made into whatever has a purpose for being - what is 400 light years away can be made just 40 light-years away, or even less - without any mechanical equipment. 10 years ago can be made yesterday, tomorrow, or now.

As I said in the last post, Jesus said of God: "And the Father who sent me has himself testified concerning me. You have never heard his voice nor seen his form."

I also know his form, and it is made of considerations.

And as Jesus said, "For whatever is hidden is meant to be disclosed, and whatever is concealed is meant to be brought out into the open."

In the place of considerations, everything is True or False, and nothing is hidden. All the things people try to hide are fully visible there, and everything is exclaimed clear as day.

The constructs of this world are filled with granfalloons, and the places where people have invested their support are filled with falsehoods. Many of those that people trust are liars and murderers, and many of those they condemn and conspire against are filled with significant amounts of truth, which the determinations of their accusers don't perceive, but only feel threat from as they evaluate False against it.

Where all considerations are revealed, there is no speculation, no opinion, no conjecture, and no theory. There is only the truth.



I have no idea what I'm going to do next, or what when I'm going to continue explaining these further subjects. When talking about dopamine a point was reached where to further effectively detail its interactions involved moving into the sphere of the movement of considerations within a person's mind, showing its multi-dimensional interactions that reveal how dopamine is applied to assist in the work of a brain. But that has seemed like a big subject from where I am right now - though it didn't used to be, and it won't be once again, after enough time.

This is because of another subject: What happens to all those connected considerations if their reason breaks? They are all still evaluating True forward down many pathways, but are no longer perfectly reasoned into one - and that creates a lot of confusion and pain within those considerations and the environment which all their broken pieces are considering into. Those considerations are still doing their job, but they are doing it in an environment that doesn't supply the perfect context for their output meaning to be perfectly related to all other considerations around. That broken environment then first needs to be mended by considering all things that restores the reason that was.

Shrapnel

Articles Concerning a Couple of Other Matters Which I've Already Given the Understanding For

i.

Article: Study finds psychopaths have below-average intelligence

I said this long ago, on this blog, that the industry hype about sociopaths and psychopaths having high intelligence was the opposite of the truth, and a product of those who are making such assessments being of sociopathic disposition, themselves - and that it's because they regard peer-praise and the ability to manipulate situations to their personal benefit so highly, that they consider those things to be the picture of intelligence, to them.

I also said that doctor, and scientist, are two of the foremost professions populated by sociopaths / psychopaths - people who have been raised with a discipline-type which taught them 'this determination is good' vs 'this determination is bad,' putting up many roadblocks to considering within their mind and brains, and resulting in them lots of surplus dopamine to make them very functional, self-confident, and scholastically successful, while ultimately being ineffective for much beyond sucking up to the popular themes of the day, and looking for ways they can fit themselves into granfalloons.

That type of disciplining also conditioned their personalities to perceive the experience of dopamine being freed up within their brains due to concluding the work that is considering (which is the work of a brain for which dopamine is required) as though it were "reward" for fulfilling various determinations, since it replenishes in availability each time they cause the desisting of considering. This disposition renders them very non-appreciative and of the truth concerning the states of malady that come about explicitly because of dopamine-deficiency, and it makes them non-empathetic to the great suffering that their doctrine of fiction is responsible for causing for other people. Their mistaken perception results in them feeling justified in exploiting the dopamine-deficiency-caused states of suffering of others for the sake of their own personal self-gratification, which they justify to themselves as "reward" for conformity to peer-approved ideology.



[Side discussion]

That type of disciplining also conditioned their personalities to perceive the experience of the dopamine that freed up within their brains upon their conforming to a peer-approved determination (which ended some considering, freeing up the dopamine being used for that considering) as though it were "reward" for obeying that peer-approved directive. Of course, the actual state of things is that that perception of their was only a symptom of their enormous stupidity, which itself was a product of their being taught 'this is good' vs 'this is bad,' which prevented their own considering of matters within their mind and brain - which would have developed the consideration structure that is smarts.

That's why there is so much drug-related research that concludes things which is not supported by any of the evidence looked at in the study: The writer A) can't understand any of what they're looking at, and so they default to assuming it means a determination about how the substance is negative for health, because they don't know how to consider, and B) conforming to the peer-approved granfalloon makes them feel good, because it avoids considering, freeing up dopamine that was allocated towards figuring something out when they first looked at the matter.

In effect, people who are "reward"-motivated are all junkies, only looking to acquire their next fix as soon as possible, by way of falsifying whatever they're working on. That's why medical science hasn't moved one inch on the matters of dopamine and mental health in a century, and why I produced both those matters' complete understanding, from start to finish, within one year. The professions of doctor and scientist are filled with junkies who are only there for the high of feeling as though they're conforming to the peer-approved granfalloon, and whose only guidance in what they do is the appearance of propriety and authority of their peers, and who work against people who literally need dopamine to be healthy, well, and productive, just so that those doctor and scientist junkies can get their dopamine fixes by conforming to their peers' opposition of those people's lives.

I tell you the truth: The memory of those who work out of "reward" and to prevent acceptance of the truth of human physiological health will be like that given for Nazi guards who stood outside concentration camps, feeling strong, proud, and justified for upholding the murderous and self-aggrandizing granfalloon of their day. And those who call dopamine "reward" will be like early-USA slave-owners, who rationalized their positions of manipulated circumstance in society by framing Africa-Americans as sub-humans and animals, whose greatest possible semblance of civility and contribution to society was under the ownership and whip of their white owners. Those slave-owners, too, used the very same rationalization as "reward" (their being white vs others being black) to justify to themselves their disposition and ability to self-benefit in society, at the expense of those on the under side of their determination - and at the expense of the truth, itself.

The conforming Nazi guard and slave-owners of yesterday are the same people who call themselves doctors and scientists today, serving their institutions' fictions of ideological and capitalistic preference. The same evil found another form, in doctors and scientists, but it is the same evil.



[Back to the main topic]

I said that a psychopath / sociopath is someone whose mind lacks considerations, which are developed through the act of considering, which is the work of a brain that requires dopamine to accomplish. And so, since sociopaths / psychopaths lack the willingness to do the work that requires dopamine to complete, they end up having a lot of surplus dopamine, which is what produces all cognitive clarity and work-potential for a brain, and so those who have lots of it due to not using it for the work of considering have lots to apply to the few considerations that they do have, and make them very proficient in utilizing the few and basic considerations that they do possess.

In other words, due to their large dopamine availabilities (due to being non-considering, but conforming to determinations), sociopaths are highly functional in a society that has been tailored by sociopaths to benefit sociopaths.

Related post: Things to Consider About Sociopathism




ii.

Article: Could signals from the heart trigger fearful reactions based on racist stereotypes?

Thought originates in a person's heart, as belief, which is a 'This Is' command, which then travels as a signal to a person's brain, and filters through all their considerations, becoming articulated in the process. If able, a person's considerations will reason with the belief as it considers through them. And after having being fully considered, there is output a new meaning, which takes a manifest form, such as an action, the development of a new consideration, etc, and so, by way of Reason, what was considered applies back into the mind which considered it.

Related post: Articles: Study Suggests Genetics Could Be The Root Cause Of Schizophrenia (*big yawn*, I already resolved this) (part iv.)


Regarding this: "Thought originates in a person's heart, as belief, which is a 'This Is' command, which then travels to a person's brain, and filters through all their considerations, becoming articulated in the process."

... this is why Jesus said "The good man brings good things out of the good treasure of his heart, and the evil man brings evil things out of the evil treasure of his heart. For out of the overflow of the heart, the mouth speaks."

And Also: "But the things that come out of a person's mouth come from the heart, and these defile them. For out of the heart come evil thoughts--murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander. These are what defile a person; but eating with unwashed hands does not defile them."

And another excerpt, from Mark, says: "'Are you so dull?' he asked. 'Don't you see that nothing that enters a person from the outside can defile them? For it doesn't go into their heart but into their stomach, and then out of the body.' (In saying this, Jesus declared all foods clean.)

'What comes out of a person is what defiles them. For it is from within, out of a person's heart, that evil thoughts come--sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander, arrogance and folly. All these evils come from inside and defile a person.'"

That same also declares all drugs to be clean.



What does it look like, when a person believes in the truth, and that belief invokes Reason and causes considering? It follows the pattern that electricity makes for itself, as it moves through a medium - like can be seen at 1:15 of this video:

Or, like can be seen in the synaptic connections in a person's brain, which are the manifestation of belief.


And this manifestation that starts with belief, and, because of Reason, goes on to produce the truth of all things, is also what Jesus referred to when saying, "The kingdom of heaven is like a mustard seed, which a man took and planted in his field. Though it is the smallest of all seeds, yet when it grows, it is the largest of garden plants and becomes a tree, so that the birds come and perch in its branches."

And also: "The kingdom of heaven is like yeast that a woman took and mixed into about sixty pounds of flour until it worked all through the dough."

Just as yeast causes dough to rise, so do the considerations that emanate from belief cause a mind to rise up into the greater perception, and joining of the truth.


No study or science was required in producing the full understanding of these matters, but only considering them from the belief that is good, and with a willingness for truth, rather than for self-benefit and conformity to peer-approval for the sake of experiencing "reward."

And conforming to, and making determinations for the sake of experiencing "reward" is only different than a person stealing money (rather than truth) to buy crack cocaine in that the person stealing money to buy a dopaminergic drug to experience a dopamine increase may well have a legitimate dopamine deficiency that those stealing truth for their fix have prevented from being addressed through other means.




iii.

All movement is produced by considering, and a person can only act, or move from one state to another by Reason. To be able to consider, to create movement, a person must first have belief, which creates context between considerations and is a 'This Is' declaration, upon which Reason acts. When a person is unwilling to first have belief, their only other option to progress is by creating false reasons by making determinations, which progressively divide and reduce the connectivity of considerations, which forms their mind and being. A person who does not believe, but who makes determinations to benefit themselves, is continually exhausting their spiritual equity. And the state of no longer having any consideration to be move through is the "outer darkness" that Jesus spoke about. The absence of movement of considerations by being considered through other consideration, is death.

And this is also why this declaration from Jesus is truthful: "And this is eternal life, that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent."

And also: "I am the resurrection and the life. The one who believes in me will live even if he dies, and the one who lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this?"


The only way to know something is to have fully considered it, to have its full being considering through oneself, so that it is known - because everything is its considerations.

To have considered something, a person must first have had the belief which provoked and warranted consideration of it. So, if a person truly believes in the only concept which amounts to all considerations, all evaluating as True, all going into one another, producing the state of All in All, then there is no death within that person, but that person has eternal life inside of themselves, and will not see death, as Jesus said: "Very truly I tell you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life and will not be judged but has crossed over from death to life."

And also: "Anyone who loves me will obey my teaching. My Father will love them, and we will come to them and make our home with them."

Shrapnel

The Third Entry Into "An Eclectic Assortment of Articles, Which All Receive Resolution by Understanding Dopamine"

Related posts:
An Eclectic Assortment of Articles, Which All Receive Resolution by Understanding Dopamine
A Few More for: An Eclectic Assortment of Articles...



i.

Study finds searching for the next word while maintaining a gaze becomes too much for your brain to handle

That is entirely a matter of dopamine-availability: The greater the dopamine-availability, the more synapse-branches a brain is capable to hold in context at one time, and the more concurrent activities it can perform, evaluate, and direct. Increasing dopamine (while restraining adrenaline / noradrenaline) is simply a dial that incrementally turns up the performance-equity of a brain, which consequently has the equal effect on the performance-equity of the entire body.

The shifting of eyes, or focus, and every nervous tick, or changing of behaviour, is the re-allocation and prioritization of dopamine in action.



Levels of a feel-good brain chemical diminish over the years

This is because people are being taught to conform to determinations, and the more determinations a person takes into themselves, the more fractured the information contained within their brain and mind becomes, and the more dopamine becomes required to hold all the disparate branches of determination-imprisoned considerations in functional context. This means reduced capacity for such a brain to handle any work - including the process of making more dopamine. This declining progression is the basis of dementia.

The more determinations a person bases their outlook upon, the more disjointed the information within their brain becomes, the less efficient their brain becomes when trying to work with many considerations that are not harmonized, the more dopamine is required for their brain to conduct that work, the less dopamine is available for their brain to do more work with, including work such as producing more dopamine.



Living near heavy traffic increases risk of dementia, say scientists

This is for the same reason that people born with autism can be very sensitive to sound and other stimuli: because all perceived environmental influences are invoking Reason within a person's brain, causing considerations, which are polar, to process the incoming information by considering it - which depends on the allocation of dopamine. So, the more perceived information incoming, the larger a drain there is on a person's dopamine-availability. But, if there is not enough dopamine available to handle all the commands received by Reason, then the considering processes will tear through a person's brain until the perception of truth in the brain is frayed to the point that the brain can no longer perceive the commands that are causing this - and this is because Reason is immutable and cannot be silenced. So, living in an area filled with many different auditory influences is creating a lot of work for a brain, which reduces the brain's work and performance equity, and over time could be a lot of cumulative stress that leads to dementia, which is a mental stress-emergent ailment. And, as I've said all along, mental stress is insufficient dopamine relative to the amount of work which a brain is trying to handle and accomplish.

I also previously explained autistic sensitivity to environmental stimuli as being due to Reason pulling signals through a brain that lacks the dopamine to properly process those signals in the post Dopamine Deficient Signal Routing Causing Affliction in Cases of Autism, OCD, ADD / ADHD...

And, just as I said before, Managing and Increasing Dopamine Can Easily Add Years to a Person's Life and Good Health.



“Pregnancy brain” means reductions in gray matter for new mothers

Weaving a baby in a mother's womb is the work of considering, and it depends upon dopamine to enable and keep safe all the considering work involved. That increased workload for the mother naturally drains the dopamine that is being allocated towards the mother's own brain, and so, unless a mother keeps her dopamine levels high enough to handle both the baby's development and the mother's, there is a bit of atrophy in the mother's brain. This is the same effect as occurs in people with mental stress ailments, such as poverty, and schizophrenia, as pointed out in the post Study Suggests Genetics Could Be The Root Cause Of Schizophrenia (*big yawn*, I already resolved this).


This is also why I previously said in the post Cocaine Use During Pregnancy Can Prevent Autism (and elsewhere) that one of the very healthiest things a pregnant mother can do for themselves, and to fortify the positive development of their child, is to take pure cocaine while pregnant. Other dopaminergics will not work as well, due to their non-beneficial dopamine-to-adren/noradren ratios, nor will cocaine that is cut with common buffing agents that raise adren/noradren. Cocaine greatly inhibits the uptake of noradrenaline by the heart, which keeps the body and brain calm while proficiently raising dopamine-availability in a brain - which makes cocaine a perfect miracle-cure for mental stress ailments, taken properly.



Researchers Find the Possible Culprit Behind Common Autism Problem

Of course, mental stress is insufficient dopamine relative to the work that a brain is trying to handle. And, I've said since long ago that autism is a mental stress ailment, which is the product of development within a pregnant mother being interrupted due to a lack of dopamine-availability within the pregnant-mother's brain.

By the way, the lack of brain-synapse pruning in babies who are born autistic is simply because there wasn't sufficient dopamine-availability in the pregnant mother's brain to develop their baby to the point of concept-resolution, which is when synapse-pruning takes plthe work of synapse-pruning.

And I've also said that being born with incomplete development leaves the autistic child with a very inefficient-working brain, since considerations that resolve into onesness require only one quantum of dopamine to active and have their entire concept be held as True - but that many branches of considerations, which have not yet resolves into oneness will each require their own own quantum of dopamine to activate all the threads that experience a degree of difference between each other. Each point of non-reconciled difference will require dopamine to temporarily consider the difference between the points to make them able to reason together for any particular task.

So, the state of incomplete development that an autistic person is born with leaves them very dopamine-disadvantaged, and their bodies subjected to stress, and higher levels of stress, much more regularly.



Editing genes to eliminate cancer or Schizophrenia could stop the rise of geniuses, scientist warns

Scientists discover the gene editing 'off-switch' that could protect against accidents or stop it from being used for harm

I've talked about this before (A Gene is a Concept - and a quality), and as I said, genes are an output of considering, which is guided by Reason, following belief. When there is an issue with genes, there is an issue in the considering process that is developing them - such as a lack of dopamine to support the developmental work that is considering. But, as genes are an inter-dependent ecosystem, removing some will modify the behaviour of others, and reduce the overall dimension which the body is capable of navigating, and possibly create confusion and genetic memory-loss. A gene was considered into being (an example of 'the world became flesh'), and is living, and has a hope. Removing one to spare the body is akin to removing a suffering person from life on Earth to make things more comfortable for a certain demographic.

By the way, the lack of brain-synapse pruning in babies who are born autistic is simply because there wasn't sufficient dopamine-availability in the pregnant mother's brain to direct and person the action of synapse-pruning.

Do YOU have the angry gene? Scientists discover why some women are more prone to PMT

It is not an angry gene, but when a gene is assisting with work for which there is insufficient dopamine-availability, or when a gene's contribution to work is causing reduced availability for other processes, it creates stress, which frustrates the work of other processes within the body, and can experience as being expressively-inhibited, causing build-up of energy in places, which turns to discomfort and anger. Increasing dopamine while simultaneously inhibiting adren/noradren during PMT will alleviate PMT.



Cellular reprogramming has been used to reverse ageing in living animals for the first time

You know where cells receive their programming from? Belief-invoked Reason, which causing the considering that, amongst all other things, is what is called evolution.

When a person ingests food or drink, pollutant or drug, that thing that is ingested, as all things, are made of considerations, and the influence they bear on a person of a particular state is a relative to the considerations that material communicates with the considerations within the person that receives it. The particular influence of any thing is not based on a determination, but based on how the receiving body of considerations considers the incoming influence. That is why Jesus said, "And these signs will accompany those who believe: In my name they will drive out demons; they will speak in new tongues; they will pick up snakes with their hands; and when they drink deadly poison, it will not hurt them at all; they will place their hands on sick people, and they will get well."

And, as I've said, the truth is one consideration giving itself to another with neither force nor resistance, creating a friction-free bolt of considering of the truth which is what Jesus refers to when saying "For as the lightning flashes in the east and shines to the west, so it will be when the Son of Man comes." And for this purpose, Isaiah spoke, "Every valley shall be raised up, every mountain and hill made low; the rough ground shall become level, the rugged places a plain. And the glory of the Lord will be revealed, and all people will see it together. For the mouth of the Lord has spoken," referring to the organizing of considerations to create the all-True pathway for the only truthful ordering of all considerations to come like a bolt of lightning and pure energy.

Considering via this knowledge changes matter to pure energy, and makes what is immaterial, material.




ii.

These are all very simple problems, with straight-forward solutions, and like Nikola Tesla said of Thomas Edison, "His method was inefficient in the extreme, for an immense ground had to be covered to get anything at all unless blind chance intervened and, at first, I was almost a sorry witness of his doings, knowing that just a little theory and calculation would have saved him 90 per cent of the labor" ... so it also is regarding institutional medicine and those who practice it, and work on its "science" - simply accepting the truth of dopamine, rather than opposing it, and therefore also the lives and well-being of those who needed it, would have saved "scientists" and "doctors" from a century of fruitlessness, of being only a lackey for a corrupt and evil status-quo, and would have saved many, many millions of lives and people from suffering that is greater than anything those calling themselves "scientists" and "doctors" have ever known.


What I have given is a unified and truthful understanding, such as those touted and searched for regarding physics, but for human physiology - freedom from, and cure and prevention of mental suffering and ailment, and the keys to long and robust physical and mental health. All that’s to wait for now, is for the institutional regime of sociopaths to exhaust their fruitless and victimizing denials, and for them to start engaging with the truth. And the greatest potential credit available to them now concerning their professional practices and aspirations, is that they enter into the knowledge brought into the world through the great and humble Siats who overcame all of their death-dealing practices and doctrine.

Shrapnel

Article: "Percocet Ruins Lives", But It Saved This Woman's

Article: Percocet Ruins Lives, But It Saved Mine

If the article's writer better understood what is actually behind the narrative and physiology that suggests a picture of dopaminergics and other drugs as ruining lives, it is likely she would only write the first part of her article's title in parentheses: "Percocet Ruins Lives", But It Saved Mine.

Anyway...

Here's a related post from this blog: Adendum - Migraines are Dopamine Deficiency - and also: The Importance of Tact in Dopaminergic Application - and also: The Importance of Considering the Truth



i.

Imagine seeing a starving person begging a very rich and well-fed person for some food, food that would cost the very rich and well-fed person nothing to give to the starving person, not even their time, because they were paid for the time in which the starving person begged for food from the rich person... and the rich person responded to the starving person, while standing next to a table covered in food, and piling up food onto a plate for themselves, by insisting to the starving person that they've done wrong by thinking they also need food, and that they have a problem of addiction, and that they need to re-evaluate their life in a way that will get them off of food-dependency.


That is a retelling of the exchange that took place in the link-to article, where the woman described:

Last year, while I was at school, I realized that I'd forgotten my pills while visiting home. I didn't notice until, later that week, a migraine came on. After two days of hell, I went to a walk-in clinic not far from campus. The doctor, a thin, grey-haired man, glanced at me through his glasses, and asked, "What brings you in today?"

"Well," I said, "I get migraines, and I've had one for two days now. I left my medication at home over Thanksgiving. I'm going home again next week, so I just need a couple to help me get rid of this headache."

"What do you take?" he asked, without lifting his gaze from the computer screen.
"I have a prescription for Percocet."

He turned and looked at me. "How much do those go for on campus?" he said sarcastically.

"Sorry, what?" I said, confused. I began trying to explain myself. "No, you see, I have a prescription, but I left mine at home and--"

"Ya, I'm sure you do," he said, and proceeded to lecture me about my "addiction," while writing me a prescription to "get me off of it."



So, what if a person who was starving and without access to food was asking somebody with access for food, and the person they asked responded condescendingly and scolded them for having a need of food? Wouldn't such a person who treats another that way qualify as a monster? But the experiences of low dopamine can easily be far more painful and torturous than the experience of starving from lack of food, or dehydration from lack of water.



The conduct of the doctor described by the doctor perfectly resembles what I identified in the post Article: Common brain signature marks autism, attention deficit:

I would presume that a lot of the medical professionals who read this blog don't like it when I write pointed accusations at them, since viewer numbers have always dropped off a steep cliff following such statement since the beginning of the blog, but so what? They're professional murderers and thieves of people's lives, and bringers of suffering to those around the people their doctrine steals the life from. Their entire ideology has been a harmful and indefensible lie, and they've been its advocates. If those whose lives, minds, and dreams have been taken or restrained because of their choices haven't been protected, and neither have been those who truthfully spoke their dopaminergic need, then why should be the egos of those who took those people's lives, minds, and dreams, and who prop up the most malicious and deceptive facade human society ever produced?

Do they condition their willingness to engage the truth upon first having their falseness accommodated and pandered to?


What did Jesus instruct? Was it to hypocritically scold, demean, and disregard whoever asks for something, or to "Give to everyone who asks you", and "Do to others as you would have them do to you"? Did Jesus add an exception of "except where sociopathic granfalloons come into play"?

When doctors base and make their whole lives around denying other people, those most vulnerable and suffering, theirs, as well as keeping them in a state of torture, and condescending, chiding, and shaming them for even just requesting what is their only true relief, how can it be substantiated that the doctors who do this are deserving of anything which they have made for themselves?



ii.

The woman who wrote the linked-to article correctly perceived that the increase in dopamine-availability which oxycodone (the main ingredient in Percocet) provides her is the authentic, needed +1 to her dopamine-deficient state of -1. Or, perhaps the dopamine she receives from the oxycodone in Percocet is only a +6 to her dopamine-deficient state of -17, and yet the difference of being raised to only -11 would still feel like a heavenly relief.

Meanwhile, the typical doctor is probably riding on a baseline dopamine platform of +50, which they produce for themselves by believing that they are good dogs for casting the peer-approved determinations upon other people. And they feel so aggressively entitled to that dopamine-rich state, which is their failure to consider, that it is rare for one of them to open their minds to considering the actual people that they practice their professional rape upon.

To properly care for a person, the person must be considered first. When a doctor is more interested in foisting their dogma upon a person who is suffering, it is not the person they are caring for, but their ideological granfalloon, which they adamantly adhere to so that they can tell themselves what a good dog they are, and shut down all considering work in their brain to induce a greater dopamine-availability. When a doctor acts as the one described by the woman who wrote the linked-to article, they are literally jacking off their brains via their sociopathic stupidity, while chiding a person for recognizing their personal actual need for the same dopamine that the doctor is desperately trying to build up in their science-addled brain.

But since for all things there is an ordering of considerations, and in a case of 'if one then not the other', when a doctor lets their dogmas and granfalloons evaluate as True, so that they can beat a patient with them, then their consideration of the person who is their patient evaluates as False. And without considering the person as they express themselves, they have not cared for the person.



iii.

Also, notice that the doctor described in the woman's article defaulted to a determination about the woman as soon as she described her situation and made her request. The considerations a person puts forth is rolling-out of a blueprint that reveals precisely how their brain is wired. In the case of the doctor described, that person has allocated their determinations to be of greater importance than giving room to let the truth be considered. Because a determination is a falsehood by nature, saying 'these considerations, but not these others', it falsifies the output of any considering that emanates from it:

The Will by which a thing is considered is the Will that is returned at the end of the considering. And the Will placed into a determination is an evaluation of False towards the truth, which is carried through all the considering that streams from that determination, and outputs a conclusion that will be perfectly-antithetical to the truth in some manner, just like in the case of 'dopamine as reward'.

Just as much as it is impossible for a mathematical statement to express a truthful answer if one of its variables is changed from its True form, it is just the same with considering. Determining a false ordering of considerations falsifies the whole work. And it is precisely and only because mathematics obeys the rule of Reason (which I will illustrate at some point) that it works.


 Because the doctor so easily imposed a determination, which he then proceeded to consider as True by act of will, it means that the doctor's mind is wired for falsehood, and that he is highly sociopathic. And because that doctor held their determination as True, from that point onward, he was unable to see anything clearly, and was acting upon a delusion from his own mind. And that delusion harmed the woman who had come to see him, and worsened her dopamine deficiency-based state of suffering.

Normally, when people act on hallucination and are dangerous to other people, they are sometimes locked up and put under observation. Shouldn't doctors be locking themselves up, since their entire ideology is a sociopathic delusion that has harmed, and is continuing to harm many millions of people? By not locking themselves up, to keep the public safe from them and the falsehoods they peddle, they are adding to their hypocrisy.

P.S. - psychology, psychoanalysis, tends to be drivel, but what I speak from shares the same exactness as mathematics, and is why mathematics bears truthful statements. If a doctor imposes a determination which they then consider off of as if it were True, they have formed, and are actively engaging sociopathic connectivity in their brain. And any efforts made though exertion of that falsified ordering of considerations will bear the falsehoods of that circuit passed on in their results. And everything traces back to where it originated, down to the very consideration, its evaluation, and all that made up its environment, including all the furthest reaches of existence.



iv.

Having started this blog due to what I discovered concerning my own severe health ailments, and their successful resolutions, after having spent many, many years as a victim of far too many doctors and specialists, I can state confirmation, that what the woman who wrote the linked-to article described about her experience with a doctor is normal, and that the caring of many, perhaps most doctors is so conditional and superficial that, often, all semblance of it quickly vanishes the moment anything about the doctor's own environment of personal comfort, which is their practice, their feeling of authority, their belief in a dogma, is put to test, even benignly. And the moment that happens, many, many doctors will abuse their position to inflict intimidation, condescension, or spite, even in ways that they fully know can or certainly will be physically or otherwise severely detrimental to a patient. Though there are exceptions, I believe that this describes the temperament of the average doctor, and that their self-assuredness does not come from actually knowing anything, but from the appearance of authority presented by their granfalloon, that they are giving themselves to.

But, when a doctor's caring for patients only exists within the pre-fulfilled context of their personal wants being pandered to, with their title, reputation, office, authority, salary, an easy access to drugs they prevent other people from accessing (depending on where in the world, a doctor is not allowed to write themselves prescriptions. But, a great number of doctors, including ones who are hard-line against writing opioid and stimulant prescriptions to patients, give themselves special prescriptions of these kinds by writing them using names of their family members, that they then pick up themselves, for their own use. Also, there are doctors who write each other friendly bonus prescriptions, thinking as if their special educations make them super-duper good for it), yet they aren't willing to consider anything that puts any of those things at risk, it means that they aren't genuinely caring about other people, but just themselves.



v.

When I read the woman's experience, I am filled with reminder of the awareness that what the doctor aggressively opposes for someone who is most desperately needing of it for her proper, natural health and well-being, has been the foundation for everything that the doctor, with great arrogance, seeks for himself, even through his lecturing of the woman in service of his dogmatic suppositions.

But the difference between the doctor and the woman's pursuit of the same dopamine is that the woman legitimately needed it, and was rightful in acknowledging that and pursuing it, whereas the doctor already had an abundance of it, stored up through the much less legitimate means of circumventing truthful consideration with his determinations. And perhaps he greedily sought more of it by way of congratulating himself for being a good dog by enforcing what is a false and evil ideology, all at the expense of a woman who was suffering specifically because she lacks in availability of that same dopamine - which, for the doctor, doesn't become more available from doing anything right or wrong, good or bad, but from believing to himself that he is now a good dog, resolving any prior considering of the situation and freeing up the dopamine that was being used to connect information required for the sake of that considering.



vi.

I hope that it has become clear to all who read this blog that what a doctor, scientist, or anybody has been justifying as their dopaminergic "reward", their self-pandering entitlement, and their right to feel superior because of their learnedness has actually been nothing more than their colossal inhumane, arrogant stupidity, and selfish bias.

Those who believe 'dopamine as reward' have defined goodness as whatever serves their own personal comfort and bias. Many doctors practice medicine on people because doing so means to them that they've now fulfilled the picture of what is good, and can feel as though they've done their bit, resolving considering in their brain, which delivers them "reward" - and not because they consider the people who have need for help, that they might become empathetic of them. But it is not an action that makes somebody justified or non-justified, but the reason why it was done, with account given for all considerations.

There is a difference between doing what is determined as good because is serves personal reward, and doing what is truly good because to do so is the truth, and so that goodness will be. The former can never be truly good, and the difference is known in the truth.



vii.

In the case of the woman who wrote the article, the doctor who abused her exacerbated her dopamine deficiency by presenting trouble, and non-truthful consideration by his words and attitude, which the woman's brain then had to consider the truth of in the light of a better belief, in order to overcome - and the work of a brain, which is considering, requires dopamine.

"Satan" means 'one who opposes', and this doctor was a satan to this woman, her health, and the truth. But, despite the evils of doctors and their doctrine, look at the final sentence the woman wrote for her article, and notice that she's found the perfect truth, and that the light of the truth has shone through her experience and words:

"I do not have an addiction. I do not have a problem with prescription drugs... I have a solution."

The publishing of her article shows that she did indeed overcome the stress inflicted upon her by the doctor - thanks, in part, to the increase in dopamine-availability that her Percocet provided her with.
But also because she didn't accept the harmful determinations the sociopath doctor imposed upon her, but instead considered her own experience, and had faith in the truth of the matter, which her own experiences taught her.

I think that it is time for society as a whole to overcome the harms and evil of self-"reward"ing doctors, scientists, and their false dogma.

Shrapnel

Further Information on "Addiction" and Drug-Associated Health Issues, and the Environment That Produces Them

i.

Anything less than True is False, and so it is in a mind, where concepts are made of considerations, which each have a polarity. For a concept to evaluate as True, all its considerations must unify into a True altogether. And if just one of a concept's considerations is aligned against the whole picture, and evaluating as True against that picture, then that entire concept evaluates as False.

If a consideration is aligned against the understanding that what a person does is OK, then that contrarily-aligned consideration is feeding a streaming +1 value against the person's confidence and security, which is a continual +(-1) being imparted upon their  wholeness. This progressively splits the person's mind with growing uncertainty, doubt, anxiety, which can lead to fear, and panic.

And when a person has taken a drug that accelerates the pace at which their mind works, then the descent into internal suffering is all the worse.



ii.

But be sure to make full note that this is not caused by the drug itself, and is a poisonous seed that was sewn in their minds by anti-drug messaging, and messaging of non-acceptance or non-approval for doing such things. The reality will still be that the dopamine which they seek from the drugs they take is still what their brain runs on, and what is needed to make the difference between their suffering and their well-being.

And then those who sowed that harmful self-doubting considering within the people who experience it purport to treat and "help" them, all the while profiting monetarily and reputation-wise off the states that they, and those of their professions before them created, and maintain in society. And then those people further "reward" themselves by fulfilling their determinations for what makes them personally a good dog, contributing to an ideology that is false, and their reward is a release of the same dopamine in their already over-dopamined brains as that which they work to prevent from being increased in the brains of those who need it most.



iii.

The choice to employ social engineering against people who engaged in drug use, which ostracized them and caused all the problems the institution then presents itself as being needed to look after was not done out of caring for the people who were being harmed, and a doctor who employs the institution's teaching does not firstly, and therefore genuinely care about the people they practice those teachings upon. But they are charlatans, who do the things they do, not with the truth, compassion and care for another person as their leading consideration, but because of what I've written in the post A Treatise of Existence, part 2:

When a person makes a determination, they align considerations against one another within their own mind, because of Reason, and the amount of space within their mind that they are able to exist in at any one given time, and have evaluate as True, is reduced, while at the same time, the number of considerations they experience as opposing what they’ve determined to be True increases.

Also, as a person increases the volume of consideration value within their mind that is negative, relative to their determinations, they will feel incomplete unless something fills that negative consideration value, something that they can label and target, and use to define themselves as good by defining good within themselves as being ‘not that,’ contrasting themselves against those things (for example, a physician often fills their negative consideration-value with determined concepts of people who use dopaminergics as having problems that need institutional defining and direction, and simultaneously define themselves as good for not being like this, and so are deserving of their determined concept of "reward," which is the same dopamine, only gained through false-pretenses).



iv.

All things are made of considerations, and whereas a person may do something and physical trace is no longer apparent afterwards, it is not the same with consideration. Everything is delivering consideration to everything else, and all consideration is accounted for in the truth. The consideration of what was done regarding these things remains, lingering in society, and its negative consideration value is tremendous. And here is what has been done:

Government, scientists, and doctors have spent decades disseminating false research and prolific messaging that instils uncertainty, nervousness, doubt, fear, feelings of non-acceptable drug usage, which causes mental agitation, divides a mind, and negative considering when a person takes drugs.  Then they work to convince people that they have a problem, when convincing them of such is the root cause of behaviour that is problematic. Then they use the expression of those things that were artificially put into people and society as justification for doing those things to people with their messaging and ostracization in the first place. They then feed institutions and "professionals" (who are charlatans that don't actually know anything truthful) who profit both monetarily and reputation-wise for "helping" people with the problems they and their institutions created.



v.

Further, because anything less than True is False, by imposing ideological determinations upon people who use drugs, that might convince them that there is a problem, that something is not fully right, that they would be better otherwise, they cause consideration towards the state of full well-being within the person to be aligned against their own state of full well-being, so long as they don't modify their behaviour, and in doing so, they not only create, but they lock-in, as perpetual, the person's state of feeling want and need.

And for those who they successfully convince of their determinations, to conform to them, who do so only to feel more accepted, such as the institution of Alcoholics Anonymous, are left in a state of perpetual imprisonment, not allowed to overcome that consideration that keeps them out of full-being. And because those people have accepted the determinations which are aligned against the thoughts and behaviour of allowing drug use, those people have accepted a prejudice into themselves. And these people are examples of who Jesus spoke of when he said to the Pharisees of his day:

"Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over land and sea to win a single convert, and when you have succeeded, you make them twice as much a child of hell as you are."



vi.

What is considered into a person become digested by their mind, and a part of their feeling and being. And just as with raising a child, a parent has the option of telling things which deliver positive consideration and build a child up and give them strength of character, or deliver discouraging and abusive consideration, which leads to all problems inside of the person, it is the same with adults: Truthful and constructive messaging will build an adult person, while antagonistic, demoralizing consideration will wear an adult person down until they are defeated.

Institutional medicine, government, doctors, scientists have chosen, for decades, to degrade, demoralize, deceive, to instil fear, worry, and doubt into people who use drugs, and to ostracize them for using drugs. If they had seen those people as equal and valuable, then they would have considered them as being equal and valuable. And if they had chosen to consider the person as equal and valuable, and delivered the messaging that affirms a person's right to choose, and to have confidence in their choice, then none of the problems associated which drug use would exist, because those problems are not caused by drug use at all, but by society's chosen reaction and attitude towards it.

It is exactly as written at the end of this article:

"It may well be that prohibition, and distribution of drugs by criminals, gives worse results for the outcomes we think are important, such as harm to the user and to communities through crime. But equally, we may tolerate these outcomes, because we decide it is more important that we declare ourselves to disapprove of drug use."

And it is because government, scientists, doctors chose to deny a person's right to choose over their own body, instead imposing their ideology upon people's bodies and minds, that they are equal to rapists: Because the effects of a person imposing their will upon another bears will always bear the same detrimental meaning upon the considerations of a person's mind, and that detrimental influence is the identity of rape. Do not judge by outside appearance, but judge only once having considered all things truthfully. And remember that I've said that the truth is one consideration giving itself to another with neither force nor resistance.

And all that people who practice rape as their profession have accrued for themselves in property and reputation is ill-gained, and stolen from those whose lives were raped by the messaging that was determined and imposed upon them. And this is the judgement that stands against those who did these things to other people: all the attributed ills of a drug-user's affliction are the debt owed by those who refused to choose a more considerate message to give to those people.



vii.

And beware of the behaviour that I described earlier:

Government, scientists, and doctors have spent decades disseminating false research and prolific messaging that instils uncertainty, nervousness, doubt, fear, feelings of non-acceptable drug usage, which causes mental agitation, divides a mind, and negative considering when a person takes drugs.  Then they work to convince people that they have a problem, when convincing them of such is the root cause of behaviour that is problematic. Then they use the expression of those things that were artificially put into people and society as justification for doing those things to people with their messaging and ostracization in the first place. They then feed institutions and "professionals" (who are charlatans that don't actually know anything truthful) who profit both monetarily and reputation-wise for "helping" people with the problems they and their institutions created.

Because this is typical behaviour of sociopaths: They make determinations to give themselves leverage.

A determination is a falsehood by nature, which says, 'these considerations and not these others', falsely strengthening some connections between considerations while simultaneously falsely weakening others, polarizing and biasing an environment of considerations.

Aligning some consideration against others creates a sense of absence for many considerations and those who share them, which is a perpetual need that does not heal unless the image of truth is restored. And so, for as long as that wound in the truth is prevented from becoming healed, it is an opportunity for those who made and perpetuate it to capitalise on the need, the suffering, and the confusion of those considerations which were attacked and abandoned. So, they impose a falsehood, which creates suffering and sense of need, and then they exploit the situation for their own personal gain.

And this behaviour is what institutional medicine is comprehensively about: Where governments whose pre-determined goal is to produce conclusions which support their drug-prohibition policies are also who license and regulate drug research (which establishes the doctrine from professional practice to academic study), where the companies that choose and fund the research that seeks and receives licenses are 'in the business of shareholder profit, not helping the sick,' where those scientists who carry out the selected, funded, and licensed research, and who produce its conclusions are "reward"-motivated to count-as-confirmed every bias which makes their employer more money and which gains them more recognition, control, and dopamine-availability increase, ... and where those who employ and enforce the narrative chosen by the former three groups have “reward” (increasing their personal dopamine-availability) as their primary motivation, and where those doctors, specialists, etc, have determined that “reward” within themselves to come from contributing to the doctrine that is a murderous lie.


As I've said before, Science, which is the practice of making determinations upon observation, is a method of falsification, and which is a tool of sociopaths, and which instils further sociopathism within a person's mind, and within society.


All the while, the truth is that mental stress, depression, anxiety, psychosis, ADHD, PTSD, autism, bi-polar, schizophrenia, alzheimer’s, parkinson’s, and a lot more, are all only caused by insufficient dopamine-availability in a person relative to the amount of work their brain is attempting, or being forced to consider, and that all of these ailments are completely preventable (and most of them fully curable) by taking cocaine in the right manner. Also also that cocaine, and other criminalized dopaminergics are far healthier and well-being producing that anything that exists within a doctor’s arsenal of effectiveness-reduced, side-effects increased, ailment locking-in pharmaceuticals, and that the real reason why cocaine is prohibited by an echelon of sociopaths from confident use in society, is this:

Because it proficiently works to prevent ailments, to heal ones that exist, to increase mental fortitude and acuity, making its absence seem too great a tool for societal and capitalistic leverage.



Related posts:

Where Does A "Drug-Induced" Psychosis Really Come From?
How Belief Affects Mental Stress Treatment, and the Effect that Anti-Drug Propaganda Has on Mental Health

Shrapnel

A Simple Truth About "Addiction" Drug Use, and Trauma

Article: Trauma is the root cause of addiction, according to Dr. Gabor Mate


The human brain runs on dopamine, which is what most drug users are seeking from substances such as meth, cocaine, and a plethora of others. When a brain is under stress, its availability of dopamine is diminished beyond what is required to properly handle the workload presented to it, and that leads to physical discomfort, lethargy, sometimes agitation, and a lot more negative effects. This can, in turn lead to a person seeking substances which increase their dopamine to levels which simply enable them to feel normal, like the common person - though the person with dopamine deficiency interprets that state as much better than normal, because, to them, it is, and they don't realize their normal is actually much worse than what is normal to other people, and other "normal" people also don't recognize this. But when they are without enough dopamine availability, everything about their body will function less, they will have less mental acuity, less energy to think and act with, etc.

This is also a big part of why people who have experienced trauma, which is a whole lot of work for a brain to get through, often end up using drugs. Also, conversely, why people with substance use problems so often have experienced trauma.

Trauma is simply an extreme amount of considering work that is presented to a brain, which requires a ton of dopamine to handle and overcome the non-considered state of. And when it is fully considered, the person is no longer affected by the trauma, and the workload is resolved. The consideration that made for the trauma has been digested, and its considerations are accounted for in their positive placements within the new state of that person's mind.

I have previously said that PTSD can be permanently cured in a person who has it by taking cocaine (and tending to all the other considerations I've mentioned), and this is true.



When a person seeks drugs to make them feel better, while in a long-term depression or other troubles, they are on the right path - because sufficient dopamine availability will be required for them to consider the difference between the state they're in, and their fully healed state. But so often, a person who does pursue their health in this manner then takes on additional feelings of guilt, worries about money, and social ostracization because of their simply tending to their brain's healthy need, and all these worrying considerations passively create more work for their brain, which then puts a drag on their dopamine availability, hindering their healing potential, and often keeping them completely locked out of making the progress within their mind that will eventually, when all things are considered, lead them to becoming fully healed

If not for the negative and worrying messaging cultivated by anti-drug interests, people would not become locked into harmful drug habits, and wouldn't experience the adverse psychological reactions that are often associated with drug usage, but the origins of which are not drugs at all, but the imposed negative conditioning by those who have ideologically opposed a person's right to choose concerning their own body.



Also, often, people around a person who uses drugs due to dopamine deficiency interprets the dopamine deficient state of that person as them not caring, and they use this assessment to write that person off, or to act in ways towards them that worsens that person's dopamine availability, and so makes that person need to increase their dopamine even more to feel OK and to be able to function properly. But what a lot of people might presume is not caring, judging from an outsider's observation, is merely an insufficient amount of available dopamine within the person's brain form them to be able to piece information together at a normal rate, for them to be able to respond normally, to have decisive thoughts, and to give them energy to act with.

If a person wishes to overcome a drug-use that they either don't want, or are made to not feel happy and accepted about, the very first thing for them to learn is that it's OK for them to use drugs, whichever drug they decide to use, and according to their discretion... and it always was. Unless a person believes that within themselves, their lack of acceptance of this will be locking their need for increasing their dopamine into place, and creating this artificial and disparate branch of considerations that was determined and imposed upon them, called "addiction."



It is clarifying of the truth behind Gabor Mate's perception to say that insufficient dopamine-availability relative to the increased workload that trauma creates for a brain is the cause of people engaging in dopamine-increasing behaviours. And those people seeking to increase their dopamine to deal with stress have been exactly right all along.



Related posts:

The Reality Behind 'Chasing the Dragon'
Where Does A "Drug-Induced" Psychosis Really Come From?
How Belief Affects Mental Stress Treatment, and the Effect that Anti-Drug Propaganda Has on Mental Health
Further Information on "Addiction" and Drug-Associated Health Issues, and the Environment that Produces them
Article: "Percocet Ruins Lives", But It Saved This Woman's
Articles: 'Belief concerning nicotine drives behaviour and dopamine availability' & The Experience of Considering

Shrapnel

How Belief Affects Mental Stress Treatment, and the Effect that Anti-Drug Propaganda Has on Mental Health

i.

One of the most important things for a person who want to treat their mental stress ailment with cocaine, or similar, is that they believe that doing so is perfectly OK, and good to do.
As I've said many times, a consideration is polar. And it is because considerations are polar that Meaning exists. And so, whenever a person engages consideration, they're being led forward.
But when a person moves by determination, they don't progress in the truth.

So, if a person holds a negative belief inside of themselves, a belief being a declaration of 'This Is' to their mind, to which Reason then applies, then that person has False, and hostile-to-truth things considering in their mind, and they accumulate negative consideration value, which reacts in anti-polar fashion to what is good.

And if a person holds a negative and non-accepting belief concerning the action they engage in, then their own choices and lingering actions against their own acceptance of what is allowed causes a judgement against their own actions to evaluate True within their mind, substantiated by their own considerations as aligned according to their deeper belief, and causing their own considerations to turn in their polarity, against them. And they may accrue guilt, and feelings of non-acceptance by what is right, whatever their belief of what is right may be.

If a person continues to engage in what they have believed is wrong, then the amount of consideration which judged them grows, and the amount of consideration which they feel safe within lessens. And this is the cause of all drug-induced psychosis, as I mentioned in this previous blog post: Where Does A "Drug-Induced" Psychosis Really Come From?

If a person had no doubts concerning their choice and activity, then there could be nothing to cause an increase of worry, panic, and fear, within them.

But even if a person doesn't feel right using cocaine, or increasing their dopamine to cure their ailment, this is still the truth: The human brain runs on the effect of cocaine, and all mental stress ailment is only caused by there being insufficient availability of the effect of cocaine within their brain, relative to the amount of work that their brain is engaged with.


ii. 

But where has this highly-detrimental belief within society, concerning the very thing the human brain runs on and engagement of what truthfully prevents mental stress and cures a person of their mental stress states, come from?

Those things have been painstakingly cultivated by governments, by institutional medicine, by scientists, and by doctors and specialists. And when a government has run a sentiment-based fear campaign against drugs, there has always been a large increase in negative influence in society, an increase of vulnerability to issues which cannot be caused by drugs alone, but only if a person has been convinced that the action they engage in anyway is wrongful. All the same mental health issues would ensue if a person, or people were convinced that drinking water made them wrong and unaccepted, yet they drank anyway because they needed to, and their own body informed them of it.

Yet, in the case of anti-drug propaganda, the thing which people in society have been brainwashed to feel uncertain about is the very cure for the mental stress states that arise from having a doubting and uncertain mind. Government, scientists, and doctors, have made people fear their own state of becoming and being healthy, the basic state of being human.

So, if a person wants to be healed of their affliction, it is important that they first understand, and believe within themselves, that taking drugs, and especially cocaine, is perfectly OK, and good for their health. Its effect is what their body was designed by nature to run on, and literally needs to overcome, to develop, and to heal.

And, as I’ve said previously, it will come to be understood that all the harms associated with drug use were caused only by the determined opposition to them by institutional medicine and those who practice it. But drugs on their own do not cause these things, and any activity that a person is uncertain about, but does anyway, will equally be a threat to their mental well-being.

iii.

The apostle Paul spoke from this understanding when he said "For instance, one person believes it's all right to eat anything. But another believer with a sensitive conscience will eat only vegetables."

And again, Paul spoke from this understanding when he said, "'Everything is permissible,' but not everything is beneficial. 'Everything is permissible,' but not everything is edifying."

And when government, scientists, and doctors disseminated falsehoods and insisted determinations upon people in society concerning what drug use is, they were those Jesus spoke of in this parable:

"The kingdom of heaven is like a man who sowed good seed in his field. But while everyone was sleeping, his enemy came and sowed weeds among the wheat, and went away.

When the wheat sprouted and formed heads, then the weeds also appeared. "The owner's servants came to him and said, 'Sir, didn't you sow good seed in your field? Where then did the weeds come from?' "'An enemy did this,' he replied. "The servants asked him, 'Do you want us to go and pull them up?' "'No,' he answered, 'because while you are pulling the weeds, you may uproot the wheat with them. Let both grow together until the harvest. At that time I will tell the harvesters: First collect the weeds and tie them in bundles to be burned; then gather the wheat and bring it into my barn.'"

The seeds of the enemy are the determinations of government, scientists, and doctors, made for the purpose of creating self-benefiting leverage in society, enforcing their ideology, giving their prejudice a target, and providing themselves with a sense of "reward."

Those determinations have produced much harmful considering in many of the most vulnerable people in society, and the mental stress ailments in society today are the weeds grown from the harmful considering that sprouted from the seeds of institutional and government-run medicine.

And the produced consideration that deepens the articulation and fine perception of a mind, allowing a person to finally understand this situation, is the fruit of the good seed, which was to be protected while the weeds were let to grow alongside. And now is the time to gather the weeds into bundles to be burned, so that only what is good may remain standing.

iv.

The false, determination-based and sentiment-driven philosophy that doctors, scientists and government rely on for dissemination their objectives concerning drug-use in society, when accepted as True by people, leads a person's consideration into all the harms which have been falsely attributed to drug-use that can be witnessed in society today, because that philosophy is not born of the consideration that brings the truth.

And as Jesus warned those he taught the truth to, to "Watch out and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees." The leaven, which causes dough to rise, is the considering caused by an accepted belief. When what has become accepted as True is bad, so is what rises from it. The same warning applies today, regarding the leaven of doctors, scientists, and government, which causes mental stress ailment, inequality, prejudice, and much suffering to rise within society.

As Jesus said, "A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit." And also, "Make a tree good and its fruit will be good, or make a tree bad and its fruit will be bad, for a tree is recognized by its fruit."

The tree Jesus spoke of is the structure of consideration which forms by a person's belief. It grows, and has branches, just like the neural network in a person's brain grown and develops branches according to a person's belief, because belief is a declaration of 'This Is', to which Reason then applies, causing considering, which is the source of all development, including human evolution.

What is the judgment of a tree which has not produced understanding and good results for the last 100 years (the very same length of time since cocaine became restricted from medical use), and the fruit of which has been the continuation, and entrenching of mental stress ailments in society?

As Jesus said, "Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire." And so it is time to cut down the False-bearing tree of institutional medicine.

v.

As the apostle Paul also said, "Those who feel free to eat anything must not look down on those who don't. And those who don't eat certain foods must not condemn those who do, for God has accepted them."

The same must apply, and does, regarding those who choose to use drugs, and those that don't: That they must not be ostracized by society for their choices concerning what they put into their own bodies in accordance with their belief, and they must not ostracize others for their choices concerning what they put into their own bodies in accordance with their own belief.

And there must not be efforts to manipulate the outcomes of any such use by those who choose to engage it.

Related post: A Few More for: An Eclectic Assortment of Articles

Shrapnel