Subject Re-Summarization and Article Dump + Beware of Abstraction-based Doctrine

Cocaine study that got up the nose of the US
Nixon official: real reason for the drug war was to criminalize black people and hippies
It's not just stem cell research that's overhyped— medical science spin is a widespread problem
Everything You've Heard About Crack And Meth Is Wrong
Hyperbole Hurts: The Surprising Truth About Methamphetamine
Why the Myth of the Meth-Damaged Brain May Hinder Recovery
Methamphetamine: Fact vs. Fiction And Lessons From The Crack Hysteria
7 Facts About Drugs and Addiction That Will Make You Question Everything You Know
The Rational Choices of Crack Addicts
Mice Fed with Cocaine Show Growth in Brain Areas Linked with Learning, Memory
Cocaine enhances memory storage in mice
Cocaine self-administration improves performance in a highly demanding water maze task


The relative dangers of drugs: What the science says

If all other things are equal, a person who drinks alcohol is doing more damage to their health and at greater risk of developing habitual usage than users of any other drug. That should put warnings about other drugs into perspective, along with the trust-worthiness of the researchers and institutions issuing warnings about drugs, rather than safe-usage information. And when institutions and researchers refuse to supply harm-reduction and safe-usage information out of ideological belief, they are making the statement that they would rather see people dead then using drugs safely. Such people have the will for murder of whoever doesn't agree with them in their hearts.


A person whose motivation is self-reward rather than the truth has made a determination to falsify an environment of considerations to make reason for their action, and is acting sociopathically. Also, the belief in reward as motivation conditions a brain to be psychopathic. The human brain does not run on reward, and the reward philosophy in contemporary behavioural studies is a false doctrine. The human brain uses dopamine to connect information across synapses, and to process information to resolution. Cocaine's enjoyable effect in the increase of dopamine in a person's brain.

Those who speak of "reward" in substance-related studies are identifying themselves as junkies, since they have called dopamine reward, and call reward as their motivation. But dopamine is not what comes at the end, but is what has to be there are the start, so that effort and potential can exist. And when work is resolved, dopamine is returned to availability. But without dopamine being there in the first place, there is no potential for work.


How come people who drink 5 glasses of water a day, or who eat 3 meals a day aren't called addicted, and their addictions to drinking water and eating food studied, while those addicts are themselves persecuted for their addictions?

If dopamine were addictive, then every human alive would already be addicted, since they are born with their brain experiencing and running on the same effect as cocaine - and then addiction would be an inconsequential or even a very good thing, because it would precisely be due to having that addiction that humans exist and live.

If a person is constantly seeking to increase their dopamine, then it is likely that they are lacking dopamine to begin with - as is the case with mental stress-based ailments such as depression, anxiety, psychosis, ADHD, schizophrenia. Even simple fatigue is an expression of a state of dopamine availability within a person's brain.

"Addiction" is an ignorant term, on par with racist epithets that were also once taken to represent sentiments presumed by many to represent truths. The term addiction does nothing to accurately convey what a situation is, and makes to effort to explain itself. It is a cop-out, and an excuse to write a conclusion for research when the researcher has no understanding of what their research actually shows.

Also, the human brain is a drug bath. So, if drugs killed, an impression that a lot of research aims to push, then everybody would be dead. Unfortunately, a lot of researchers experience "reward" from propping up dogmatic ideology-based drug attitudes, which has turned medical substance research into an industry of propaganda, ignorance, and the confirmation bias of people who want attention and money for completing research, but can't figure how to turn their observations into conclusions. Studies that base their understanding in abstractions, such as "addiction", and "reward", are not focused on reality.

Things haven't changed all that much since Reefer Madness.




The modern recycling of the same and additional lies have simply been inlaid into more technical presentations, and naively parroted and argued by people who want attention and money for completing research, but can't figure how to turn their observations into conclusions - and also whose truth has always been conformity to the appearance of authority, and who have difficulty allowing themselves to consider the possibility that if they didn't just accept on faith that the drug ideology tropes they evaluated their own moral righteousness by simply were, that they suddenly find that they don't know what to do or write. Even what is already dead can experience fear of death as it turns to cross over into life.

Shrapnel

Article: 'Study Relates High Intelligence Gene to Autism' + How Drug Prohibition (Rather Than Drugs) Attacks Mental Health

i.

Article: Yale study suggests genes associated with high intelligence also associated with autism


As I've said many times now:

Considering is the work of a brain, and is the work for which dopamine is required - to handle the association of information across synapses that are not yet perfectly reasoned together (once perfectly reasoned, there is no more disjointment between information, and no work for which dopamine is required - those fully-reasoned considerations are as one).

The more work a brain is trying to do (the more things it is considering, the more connections across synapses it is trying to make) the more dopamine it requires to properly perform that work, and to bring it to its resolution. Therefore, genes related to high intelligence indicate situations where there was required more dopamine to complete the work involved.

Gene development is an output of signal-routing in a human's brain. If there are issues with gene-development in a mother, then they hint at issues with the signal-routing by which their creation is directed - which hints at there being insufficient dopamine to handle a brain's workload.

If a mother already experiences issues with the signal-routing that develops her own genes, then, especially since pregnancy is straining on a mother's dopamine to begin with, it's expectable that there would be an expression of it in the development of her child - since its fetus development is woven by the same brain, using its dopamine-availability, and its signal-routing. And if the design template for a child is more complex, then the more dopamine there needs to be available in the mother's brain to properly fulfill its design.

Autism is caused by a mother having insufficient dopamine in her brain while pregnant to handle the signal-routing required for full development of the baby, resulting in interrupted development. Cocaine's effect is the significant increase of available dopamine in a person's brain, while inhibiting the stress-increasing uptake of norepinephrine by the heart, and so taking cocaine while pregnant can prevent autistic births, while also creating a more robust and thoroughly-developed body and brain for the born baby.

Autism is a direct expression of a pregnant mother's own insufficient dopamine-availability for the workload of creating her baby's body and brain.



ii.

What I've explained about belief (which is a 'This Is' command), invoking Reason, which causes considering, creating workload for a brain that doesn't cease and which requires dopamine to assemble information across synapses to either consider matters to their resolutions, or for falsification of the considering to be made by way of making a determination (a determination bein a falsehood by nature, saying 'these considerations, but not these others')... formulates the E=mc2 of mental health.

Mental distress exists in the world today because institutional medical doctrine, those who have created it, and those who have conformed to it (whose truth is conformity to the appearance of authority - often so that they can experience what they've disgracefully labelled their "reward", which is the dopamine they have prevented those in need of it from accessing) are in opposition to the truth of mental health, and are responsible for many people's continued and severe suffering.

Just as how oil companies produce paid-for false information in their "science" reports to keep threats to its business away, how car manufacturers falsify emissions tests to advertise and sell their cars, how the privatized and for-profit USA prison system invests in creating criminals to incarcerate, how weapons manufacturers invest in creating pretext for wars to create business for themselves, and how political parties are often creating negative propaganda against their opponents... well, the same is true of the medical industry, which creates false research to keep effective medications away from the public, while promoting patented, ineffective medications, and making easy for the public to access (and also to pander to and feed desires for "reward"). And what is a more attractive target for exploitation to those whose belief is self-benefit, than the vital necessities for every human? I think that there is no more prostituted and falsified industry than that of "healthcare."

And what aids the profiteering schemes of drug prohibition and and institutional medicine is that the middle-persons administering them have a belief-set that renders them too simplistic to clue in to the reality, because they're rationalized their status and their judgment upon others as "reward" for their conformity to those monstrous ideologies - and since these are people whose professed truth is self-gratification (which is what self-determined "reward" is all about), many of them are people who will defend a lie even when they know it is a lie, because in doing so they're defending their own comfort, their own reputation, their own profession, their own actions, their own judgments against others... in doing so, they're defending so much that they have held on to, yet which evaluates as False and injustice.

Asking many of them to do what is good and truthful (which are not separate things) is like asking a rich king who in a castle, who believes their status to be a matter of having noble blood (rather than having been in a position to take everything from everyone around them, and having done so), to evenly disperse their wealth and sources of more wealth among the citizens of their kingdom, who live in filth and poverty.



iii.

As I have said, drug-prohibition creates the mental health issues that have been falsely designated to the (far healthier than pharmaceutical) drugs that are taken in an environment of anti-drug attitudes and threats of judgment, violence, legal persecution, ostracization...

A human's brain fundamentally runs on the effect of cocaine, and that will not change.

Now, when a person believes that it is OK to engage in any action, then their mentality, which comprises their whole experience and inner health, is safe in performing that action. But when a person is not fully certain of the rightfulness of an action they take, taking that action causes inner judgment against their own mind, which is the state of some considerations evaluating other considerations of the same mind as not irreconcilable, and creates a divide in the mind.

Considerations are always trying to fulfill the image of all-True, in accordance with the belief they are in. When a person believes in something, and that belief causes the truth of what they believed in to consider into them, that person has ingested all the considerations that comprise the belief that they held as True, and they have become a part of that person.

By the way, this is why Jesus said "I tell you the truth, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you."

(And as I've said at the bottom of this post, life is the movement created by considering)


So, when a person's own action appears as False against any part of the considered (though possibly not wilfully chosen) belief of taking drugs, or of taking certain drugs, or of taking certain drugs in certain conditions, or of hiding their behaviour from people, or having to choose between what their experience registers as good and their acceptance from others... that creates considerations that evaluate as True in a branch of considering, but which are evaluating as False in light of other branches of considering, and yet both branches are streaming a constant stream of considerations as they try to fix any portion of their experience that is not perfectly True in the overall whole. And everything a person experiences is the considering of considerations, and so this creates an agitated and confused state within a person.

That fracturing of the whole mind, and all the considerings that it causes, and all points of considerations being at odds with other considerations and considerings (which are the stress, agitation, and panic that all greater mental health issues branch from), are work to a brain, and require dopamine to fix - and the more breakage there is, the more non-uniformity between considerations of one human brain, the more dopamine it takes to support it all, and to work with it all, and to consider things back into one wholeness.

But the problem was never the usage of any drug, or of having an interest in increasing dopamine - those are acceptable and needed things for a human, so that they can have good mental health. The problem was the acceptance of false messaging from institutional medicine, government, law enforcement, which made people feel guilty, uncertain, and self-doubting by doing what is the equivalent of drinking water to stay hydrated and healthy.

Drug prohibition kills and steals, while the greatest danger involved in taking drugs is the activating of considerations imposed by anti-drug messaging in a manner that causes them to evaluate as True against a person, which causes mental distress, and a need for increasing dopamine.

Drug prohibition has always been a falsehood, built upon falsehoods, and administered by the expression of falsehoods. When a person believes institutional medicine and its practitioners concerning drug use, they are accepting a lethal poison into themselves, which will harm them from the inside any time they engage in behaviour that contravenes what is itself a malevolent lie and falsehood.

A human fundamentally requires dopamine to be mentally and physically healthy - and when they're in distress, they require more dopamine to hold themselves together and reach a positive resolution in their brain and body.



Imagine if, despite needing water to live, some people convinced others that anyone who drinks water is a bad person, and that drinking water will cause them to become dependent upon it. And so, so long as people believed that, anyone who would drink water would experience all kinds of bad things to happen to them, and also become increasingly thirstier for more water. But if they had never heard that drinking water was bad, nothing bad would happen to them if they drank it.

Because belief aligns considerations and causes considering, which is what produces all behaviour and experience, and is also the work for a brain that requires dopamine, that situation is how things are with the conscious taking of dopaminergic substances.

If a person even passively accepts into their mind a concept that causes their own considerations to evaluate against them when they do what is even a vital and completely appropriate action, then any time that a person does that action, they will be causing their own mind to consider against them - increasing their brain's workload, decreasing their inner comfort, decreasing their capacity to work things out for themselves, increasing their need for more dopamine... all because they accepted a false message that ruled against their own body's fundamental needs, and the sovereignty of their mind.



This understanding is the basis of what the apostle Paul wrote:

"Therefore let us stop passing judgment on one another. Instead, make up your mind not to put any stumbling block or obstacle in the way of a brother or sister. I am convinced, being fully persuaded in the Lord Jesus, that nothing is unclean in itself. But if anyone regards something as unclean, then for that person it is unclean. If your brother or sister is distressed because of what you eat, you are no longer acting in love. Do not by your eating destroy someone for whom Christ died. Therefore do not let what you know is good be spoken of as evil. For the kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking, but of righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Spirit, because anyone who serves Christ in this way is pleasing to God and receives human approval.

Let us therefore make every effort to do what leads to peace and to mutual edification. Do not destroy the work of God for the sake of food. All food is clean, but it is wrong for a person to eat anything that causes someone else to stumble. It is better not to eat meat or drink wine or to do anything else that will cause your brother or sister to fall. So whatever you believe about these things keep between yourself and God. Blessed is the one who does not condemn himself by what he approves. But whoever has doubts is condemned if they eat, because their eating is not from faith; and everything that does not come from faith is sin. We who are strong ought to bear with the failings of the weak and not to please ourselves. Each of us should please our neighbors for their good, to build them up."

And as Jesus said:

"There is nothing from without a man, that entering into him can defile him: but the things which come out of him, those are they that defile the man."

Shrapnel

Articles: 'Belief concerning nicotine drives behaviour and dopamine availability' & The Experience of Considering

i.

Here are a few articles, which all are about the same study:

Belief in nicotine's powers can increase addiction

Belief about nicotine content in cigarettes can curb cravings

Level Of Smoking Addiction Determined By Smoker’s Perception Of Nicotine


Excerpt from the first article:

Smokers get a rush of dopamine when nicotine from a cigarette enters their body.

It's this chemical reaction that means so many people are addicted to smoking.

But scientists believe there is something else at play - a smoker's belief in the chemical reaction can also change their cravings. 

In a study, researchers have discovered that if smokers don’t think they are getting nicotine, the rush of dopamine never arrives.


Except from the second article:

The smokers who got the nicotine, or simply believed they did, reported reduced cravings and the scan recorded increased neural activity. 

'When they believed there is nicotine and they had nicotine, the craving correlated with these anterior insula activations — but when they did not believe so, that correlation was gone." Gu said.

"Even when they had nicotine, but did not believe there was nicotine, their brain did not respond [with higher neural activity] and they still reported as much craving as before," she said.

"Basically, you have nicotine and your brain is kind of on, but the twist here is you have to have nicotine, but also believe you have nicotine for the brain to be on," she said.

"So in other words, if you have nicotine, but did not think so — you thought you had some kind of placebo — then your brain is still off," Gu said.

While the biological pull of nicotine plays a key role in the addiction, a person's belief system can also exert a pharmacological effect, she said.

Researchers hope the study, recently published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, will tell them more about the mechanism of addiction.

"It looks like addiction is not just about the substance itself, but also the belief you need the substance to have a normal daily life," Gu said.

She said the study shows why cognitive therapy is so important in changing a smoker's beliefs.



ii.

The conclusion of this study claims to have discovered something which I've already explained in much greater detail.

Recently, in the post Article: "this is how social media affects your brain", I said:

It will be no different if a person considers pouring hot-sauce in their belly-button, or any other inane activity: Whatever a person believes in which consider within their brain, to make their person's well-being status as OK only evaluate as True when the concept that is their belief is fulfilled, which will always free up dopamine, since those considerings, conscious and sub forefront-conscious, will be resolved once their reasons are fulfilled, and considering is the work of a brain, and the work that requires dopamine to connect pieces of information in new ways.


And in the post Overview of Why Placebo Works, and Isn't Really Placebo After All, I said:

- The mechanisms of the metabolic pathway can be triggered in two ways: by decomposition of a molecule (which itself has a frequency that carries its meaning as a signal and equates to a ‘This Is’ declaration upon whatever it contacts), or by a reasoned thought-signal that contains the same declarative information


I also talked on the same theme in the post The Placebo Effect is Belief Freeing Up Dopamine to Help Healing Consider



iii.

I wish it wouldn't be said in the news articles about this study'd finding that "scientists believe there is something else at play," or that science would be mentioned at all, since the greatest understanding of these things comes from me, and I did not use any science to come to know them, or read any similar understanding from any scientist's work before I spoke these things from my own knowing. In fact, when I spoke them, it was in complete opposition to and rejection of everything I'd ever heard said from the perspectives of those calling themselves scientists. I knew the truth because of Reason, and I spoke it because it is the truth. To indicate science in this is to hijack some of the full understanding's considerations, and align them in ways which spoil the image of truth of the matter.


No science was needed to know, with certainty, that this happens, because its understanding is simply inherent in the knowledge that dopamine is a brain's work potential, and that considering is a brain's work for which dopamine is required, that considering is a streaming of considerations, that a consideration is polar, that a mind is all-factoring and inter-dependent, and that belief is a 'This Is' command upon which Reason immutably acts.

There is no test, observation, research, studying, institutions, regulations needed to know even the greatest of truths. There is simply belief, considering, knowing.



iv.

As Tesla said, “My brain is only a receiver, in the Universe there is a core from which we obtain knowledge, strength and inspiration. I have not penetrated into the secrets of this core, but I know that it exists.”

Well, what is received is a streaming of considerations, which is considering. And what enables considering is belief, which is a 'This Is' command, upon which Reason acts. But an environment that is heavily falsified, such as the mind of a scientist, cannot very easily consider, because the environment of considerations which is their mind evaluates as False against all realty, because of their determinations, and so cannot produce a truthful 'This is' command, to initiate considering. But if they could, then considering is similar to this scene in Transformers.

However, in that scene, the character who information is considering through is being raped by another force, and is not in control - which, by the way, is what doctors do to synapses in people's brains whom they impose their False institutional doctrine concerning dopamine, drug-use, upon. And that is a major part of what is happening in a psychosis, which, like many other things, is only caused by a lack of dopamine to connect information to stop the broken considering processes from forcefully pushing information through synapses not in sync with all other information. And this is also what is happening in the case of autistic children being sensitive to sounds, light etc. Unfortunately, licensed medicines are, relative to cocaine, complete garbage and poison when it comes to being effective at helping against these things, because of their far worse dopamine / adrenergic effect ratios, with the adrenergic effect increasing the workload of a brain, while dopamine increases the capacity for a brain to handle larger workloads.


Considering with reasoning is also like this scene from The Fifth Element, where the character learns via watching progressive scenes on a subject, reasoning their collective meaning as the scenes progress.

With considering, and reasoning while considering, the scenes are the reasoned meaning of all known considerations, and they can consider at even millions of times the rate of those which the Fifth Element character is watching in the given clip. And the individual scenes are made of great expanses of considerations, connecting across many dimensions. And the considered scenes themselves can even be living, with their contents being living experiences of the considerations which make them.

Einstein engaged a basic level of this when he thought in pictures, and came up with his theory of relativity. But neither Einstein, nor Tesla, though they engaged considering at basic levels, knew the greater reality of these things. They neither identified the movement and interaction of considerations as a knowledge to grow, and only focused on producing works in their fields via their individual abilities as they were without any recognition for what the difference was between their minds and other people's.

But, Jesus had already spoken the same as Tesla's "My brain is only a receiver" comment, when saying "By myself I can do nothing; I judge only as I hear, and my judgment is just, for I seek not to please myself but him who sent me." And considering grows into forms far greater and more magnificent than either of these examples, or the capabilities Tesla and Einstein possessed.



v.

While Tesla was fascinated by what the small could be made to do, and worked upon the small with a separation between it and himself, I know the full resolution, Reason, which gives the small its meaning and purpose, and by knowing Reason, I also know all the considerations which resolve into it, not as an outsider, but as an equal, and as one mind, with the shared sight of all who are in Reason. These considerations not only reveal the truth about what is, but they also are what is.

If I'm willing, I can write what resolves everything that all those working in the field of physics seek, and far greater, in a single post. But, as of now, I am not resolved to do this.

A truthful person and a sociopath speak from different devices. A truthful person only speaks what has already been fully considered, and which is already true and reason. A falsehood-bearing person makes determinations about what is, and speaks their determinations without knowing anything. In the truthful person, the truth is their leading considering, and their self is placed last. In the falsehood-bearing person, their own self is their leading consideration, and the truth is placed last. By determining ones self ahead of the truth, the possibility for the truth to present is falsified.

What good is all the information in the universe if it is achieved by determination, and so is outside of you, and therefore you and that information as one is not the truth? The movement of considerations evaluating True into one another is life, and as Jesus said, "Truly, I tell all of you emphatically, if anyone keeps my word, he will never see death," and also, "What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

Making determinations reduces connectivity between considerations. If everything a person has is by making determinations upon what they perceive as being outside of themselves, then there is little connection between the determiner, and all the things that they imposed determinations upon. So how will a person be able to consider through those things so that their life will continue? They will be vulnerable to the "outer darkness" that Jesus spoke of, and these words: "But God said to him, 'You fool! This very night your life will be demanded from you. Then who will get what you have prepared for yourself? This is how it will be with whoever stores up things for themselves but is not rich toward God."

So, what if all that a person has aligned themselves to is a granfalloon? That granfalloon as a whole does not consider into the truth.



vi.

Now, back to the articles about nicotine cravings being subdued by a belief which resolving anxious considering thereby freeing up dopamine-availability, thereby increasing a person's well-being and functionality.

At the end of the CBC article, this is printed:

Researchers hope the study, recently published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, will tell them more about the mechanism of addiction.

"It looks like addiction is not just about the substance itself, but also the belief you need the substance to have a normal daily life," Gu said.


A tremendous fallacy in these statements is the use of the term "addiction," which shows that the mind speaking such is carrying determinations which are causing their considering to collapse into falsehood.

Inherent within the term of addiction are considerations which speak that a person has no control, that a person is not acting by controlled choice, and that a person's behaviour is not acceptable. If a person accepts the term of addiction as True, then Reason will cause the considerations within their own mind, which form those messages, to align in a manner which is against their own personal strength and ability to overcome. Addiction doesn't exist in the truth, but is an imposition which sociopaths place upon others in order to dominate and exploit those people. By accepting the idea of addiction, a person is choosing to allow  be dominated by its concepts.

Accepting the message of addiction is the same as accepting the message of "you can't," which doesn't allow considerations to pass, which makes it impossible for a person to overcome. And this is the great deceit, theft, and treachery behind Alcoholics Anonymous, as well as government and institutional anti-drug messaging, which has been cultivating non-confident drug usage, which is the cause of all the problems which those in government and institutional medicine continue to try to attribute to drugs.


I spoke the following, in the post: Adendum - Migraines are Dopamine Deficiency - and also: The Importance of Tact in Dopaminergic Application - and also: The Importance of Considering the Truth

(I've also now added a link to the above, in this blog's previous post: Article: "Percocet Ruins Lives", But It Saved This Woman's)

Considerations have polarity, and receive their identity as relative to one another. And such a belief aligns certain considerations in a negative manner, and for as long as it evaluates as True towards the activity a person is engaging in, all signals relating to that activity will pass through that consideration, and receive an antagonistic influence, a quantum of negative consideration-value, which can infect the whole mind. And increasing adrenaline and noradrenaline will accelerate the considering of those things that are worries, and progressively amplify the presence of negative consideration-value in the brain until a time when things settle down and they can be reconsidered into normalcy. This is where drug-induced anxiety and psychosis come from - there is nothing inherent in the drugs taken themselves that cause thes)e things, but it is a contagion created by doctors, scientists, and government, out of their sociopathic inclinations to attempt to justify their own statuses by demeaning and harming those of others, who they deem as targets for their prejudice.
...
Also, ironically, when anti-drug propaganda is being administered to a society, there is a growth in sociopathism within that society, and a reduction in intelligence within that society, and the harms put into children and teenagers are those very ones which anti-drug propaganda would have them think come from drugs: Considering is the mechanism behind evolution, and a brain develops its connections through the course of considering. Those connections themselves represent the considerations of a person's mind, and greater Truth is manifest the more considerations are accounted for within an environment - and considerations which resolve into one form concepts. A determination is like a road-block that prevents considering from occurring - and the more determinations held in a mind, the less presence of truth there is in that mind, and the more selfish and sociopathic it is likely to be.



And just as I said in this post:

The considerations that are being held in the concept of science have their truthful placements elsewhere, and science must be discarded so that the truth may appear.

And as I spoke similarly concerning memories, in this post, it is the same regarding harmful drug-usage habits, where the imposed determination of "addiction" has forced the alignment of its involved considerations, in a case of 'if one then not the other', to dominate, subjugate, and exploit a person:

A person cannot overcome the traits of addiction while accepting the notion of addiction as a truth. It is a ball-and-chain that keeps people in the state of dependence upon the directives of sociopaths outside of themselves. People use drugs because they are addicted in the same sense that black people run fast because they have lots of practice from needing to get away after stealing something. Use of the denigrating term addiction is about maintaining a barrier that prevents the truth from being considered, and the upending of a long reign of sociopathic dominance over those people who are most vulnerable in society due to their low dopamine-availability, which is largely due to their considering the words of sociopaths imposed upon them as True in the first place.

Therefore, the first step to overcome any harmful drug-usage is to first believe and know that it is OK to use drugs, and that it always was. Drugs were never the problem, but harmful messaging coming from doctors, government, and scientists, rather than truthful consideration of the matter of drugs, is what really caused people to experience harms from drugs.

The symptoms of addiction cannot exist in a person unless a person first believes in the concept of addiction, and that it applies to them. And the concept of addiction did not arise because it was truth, but because sociopaths wanted a label to impose upon people other than themselves, to dominate and put them beneath themselves.



But the basis for people seeking dopamine-increasing drugs is simply that they are deficient in dopamine-availability, and therefore the solution is to increase their dopamine availability. Even where the solution is to overcome beliefs which are causing worried considering, which is diminishing their dopamine-availability, the solution is still to increase their dopamine-availability. And a person cannot overcome harmful beliefs without first having sufficient dopamine-availability to do the work of reconsidering, and therefore increasing dopamine-availability to give a brain enough physio-fuel for that work comes first.

And much of what causes diminished dopamine-availability within people who use drugs is the impression imposed upon them that there's something wrong with what they're doing. But everyone's brain runs on the effect of cocaine, and cannot perform any work without enough of it being there first.

Also, sociopaths only have lots of dopamine-availability because they have made determinations to obstruct consideration of the truth, reducing the amount of work which their brains are attempting, while means having ample dopamine-availability.

So, there very first harmful belief for a person who suffers dopamine-deficiency (which is all that "addiction" really is) to overcome, is the notion of addiction being anything other than a falsehood which keeps a person imprisoned. Without that, nothing further can be done. So, the first step to overcoming harmful drug habits is for a person to accept that it is OK to use drugs.

Related posts:

How Belief Affects Mental Stress Treatment, and the Effect that Anti-Drug Propaganda Has on Mental Health
A Simple Truth About "Addiction" Drug Use, and Trauma
Further Information on "Addiction" and Drug-Associated Health Issues, and the Environment that Produces them
Article: "Percocet Ruins Lives", But It Saved This Woman's
Woot, found the reference (that I had wanted to include in the previous post)!

Shrapnel

Further Information on "Addiction" and Drug-Associated Health Issues, and the Environment That Produces Them

i.

Anything less than True is False, and so it is in a mind, where concepts are made of considerations, which each have a polarity. For a concept to evaluate as True, all its considerations must unify into a True altogether. And if just one of a concept's considerations is aligned against the whole picture, and evaluating as True against that picture, then that entire concept evaluates as False.

If a consideration is aligned against the understanding that what a person does is OK, then that contrarily-aligned consideration is feeding a streaming +1 value against the person's confidence and security, which is a continual +(-1) being imparted upon their  wholeness. This progressively splits the person's mind with growing uncertainty, doubt, anxiety, which can lead to fear, and panic.

And when a person has taken a drug that accelerates the pace at which their mind works, then the descent into internal suffering is all the worse.



ii.

But be sure to make full note that this is not caused by the drug itself, and is a poisonous seed that was sewn in their minds by anti-drug messaging, and messaging of non-acceptance or non-approval for doing such things. The reality will still be that the dopamine which they seek from the drugs they take is still what their brain runs on, and what is needed to make the difference between their suffering and their well-being.

And then those who sowed that harmful self-doubting considering within the people who experience it purport to treat and "help" them, all the while profiting monetarily and reputation-wise off the states that they, and those of their professions before them created, and maintain in society. And then those people further "reward" themselves by fulfilling their determinations for what makes them personally a good dog, contributing to an ideology that is false, and their reward is a release of the same dopamine in their already over-dopamined brains as that which they work to prevent from being increased in the brains of those who need it most.



iii.

The choice to employ social engineering against people who engaged in drug use, which ostracized them and caused all the problems the institution then presents itself as being needed to look after was not done out of caring for the people who were being harmed, and a doctor who employs the institution's teaching does not firstly, and therefore genuinely care about the people they practice those teachings upon. But they are charlatans, who do the things they do, not with the truth, compassion and care for another person as their leading consideration, but because of what I've written in the post A Treatise of Existence, part 2:

When a person makes a determination, they align considerations against one another within their own mind, because of Reason, and the amount of space within their mind that they are able to exist in at any one given time, and have evaluate as True, is reduced, while at the same time, the number of considerations they experience as opposing what they’ve determined to be True increases.

Also, as a person increases the volume of consideration value within their mind that is negative, relative to their determinations, they will feel incomplete unless something fills that negative consideration value, something that they can label and target, and use to define themselves as good by defining good within themselves as being ‘not that,’ contrasting themselves against those things (for example, a physician often fills their negative consideration-value with determined concepts of people who use dopaminergics as having problems that need institutional defining and direction, and simultaneously define themselves as good for not being like this, and so are deserving of their determined concept of "reward," which is the same dopamine, only gained through false-pretenses).



iv.

All things are made of considerations, and whereas a person may do something and physical trace is no longer apparent afterwards, it is not the same with consideration. Everything is delivering consideration to everything else, and all consideration is accounted for in the truth. The consideration of what was done regarding these things remains, lingering in society, and its negative consideration value is tremendous. And here is what has been done:

Government, scientists, and doctors have spent decades disseminating false research and prolific messaging that instils uncertainty, nervousness, doubt, fear, feelings of non-acceptable drug usage, which causes mental agitation, divides a mind, and negative considering when a person takes drugs.  Then they work to convince people that they have a problem, when convincing them of such is the root cause of behaviour that is problematic. Then they use the expression of those things that were artificially put into people and society as justification for doing those things to people with their messaging and ostracization in the first place. They then feed institutions and "professionals" (who are charlatans that don't actually know anything truthful) who profit both monetarily and reputation-wise for "helping" people with the problems they and their institutions created.



v.

Further, because anything less than True is False, by imposing ideological determinations upon people who use drugs, that might convince them that there is a problem, that something is not fully right, that they would be better otherwise, they cause consideration towards the state of full well-being within the person to be aligned against their own state of full well-being, so long as they don't modify their behaviour, and in doing so, they not only create, but they lock-in, as perpetual, the person's state of feeling want and need.

And for those who they successfully convince of their determinations, to conform to them, who do so only to feel more accepted, such as the institution of Alcoholics Anonymous, are left in a state of perpetual imprisonment, not allowed to overcome that consideration that keeps them out of full-being. And because those people have accepted the determinations which are aligned against the thoughts and behaviour of allowing drug use, those people have accepted a prejudice into themselves. And these people are examples of who Jesus spoke of when he said to the Pharisees of his day:

"Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over land and sea to win a single convert, and when you have succeeded, you make them twice as much a child of hell as you are."



vi.

What is considered into a person become digested by their mind, and a part of their feeling and being. And just as with raising a child, a parent has the option of telling things which deliver positive consideration and build a child up and give them strength of character, or deliver discouraging and abusive consideration, which leads to all problems inside of the person, it is the same with adults: Truthful and constructive messaging will build an adult person, while antagonistic, demoralizing consideration will wear an adult person down until they are defeated.

Institutional medicine, government, doctors, scientists have chosen, for decades, to degrade, demoralize, deceive, to instil fear, worry, and doubt into people who use drugs, and to ostracize them for using drugs. If they had seen those people as equal and valuable, then they would have considered them as being equal and valuable. And if they had chosen to consider the person as equal and valuable, and delivered the messaging that affirms a person's right to choose, and to have confidence in their choice, then none of the problems associated which drug use would exist, because those problems are not caused by drug use at all, but by society's chosen reaction and attitude towards it.

It is exactly as written at the end of this article:

"It may well be that prohibition, and distribution of drugs by criminals, gives worse results for the outcomes we think are important, such as harm to the user and to communities through crime. But equally, we may tolerate these outcomes, because we decide it is more important that we declare ourselves to disapprove of drug use."

And it is because government, scientists, doctors chose to deny a person's right to choose over their own body, instead imposing their ideology upon people's bodies and minds, that they are equal to rapists: Because the effects of a person imposing their will upon another bears will always bear the same detrimental meaning upon the considerations of a person's mind, and that detrimental influence is the identity of rape. Do not judge by outside appearance, but judge only once having considered all things truthfully. And remember that I've said that the truth is one consideration giving itself to another with neither force nor resistance.

And all that people who practice rape as their profession have accrued for themselves in property and reputation is ill-gained, and stolen from those whose lives were raped by the messaging that was determined and imposed upon them. And this is the judgement that stands against those who did these things to other people: all the attributed ills of a drug-user's affliction are the debt owed by those who refused to choose a more considerate message to give to those people.



vii.

And beware of the behaviour that I described earlier:

Government, scientists, and doctors have spent decades disseminating false research and prolific messaging that instils uncertainty, nervousness, doubt, fear, feelings of non-acceptable drug usage, which causes mental agitation, divides a mind, and negative considering when a person takes drugs.  Then they work to convince people that they have a problem, when convincing them of such is the root cause of behaviour that is problematic. Then they use the expression of those things that were artificially put into people and society as justification for doing those things to people with their messaging and ostracization in the first place. They then feed institutions and "professionals" (who are charlatans that don't actually know anything truthful) who profit both monetarily and reputation-wise for "helping" people with the problems they and their institutions created.

Because this is typical behaviour of sociopaths: They make determinations to give themselves leverage.

A determination is a falsehood by nature, which says, 'these considerations and not these others', falsely strengthening some connections between considerations while simultaneously falsely weakening others, polarizing and biasing an environment of considerations.

Aligning some consideration against others creates a sense of absence for many considerations and those who share them, which is a perpetual need that does not heal unless the image of truth is restored. And so, for as long as that wound in the truth is prevented from becoming healed, it is an opportunity for those who made and perpetuate it to capitalise on the need, the suffering, and the confusion of those considerations which were attacked and abandoned. So, they impose a falsehood, which creates suffering and sense of need, and then they exploit the situation for their own personal gain.

And this behaviour is what institutional medicine is comprehensively about: Where governments whose pre-determined goal is to produce conclusions which support their drug-prohibition policies are also who license and regulate drug research (which establishes the doctrine from professional practice to academic study), where the companies that choose and fund the research that seeks and receives licenses are 'in the business of shareholder profit, not helping the sick,' where those scientists who carry out the selected, funded, and licensed research, and who produce its conclusions are "reward"-motivated to count-as-confirmed every bias which makes their employer more money and which gains them more recognition, control, and dopamine-availability increase, ... and where those who employ and enforce the narrative chosen by the former three groups have “reward” (increasing their personal dopamine-availability) as their primary motivation, and where those doctors, specialists, etc, have determined that “reward” within themselves to come from contributing to the doctrine that is a murderous lie.


As I've said before, Science, which is the practice of making determinations upon observation, is a method of falsification, and which is a tool of sociopaths, and which instils further sociopathism within a person's mind, and within society.


All the while, the truth is that mental stress, depression, anxiety, psychosis, ADHD, PTSD, autism, bi-polar, schizophrenia, alzheimer’s, parkinson’s, and a lot more, are all only caused by insufficient dopamine-availability in a person relative to the amount of work their brain is attempting, or being forced to consider, and that all of these ailments are completely preventable (and most of them fully curable) by taking cocaine in the right manner. Also also that cocaine, and other criminalized dopaminergics are far healthier and well-being producing that anything that exists within a doctor’s arsenal of effectiveness-reduced, side-effects increased, ailment locking-in pharmaceuticals, and that the real reason why cocaine is prohibited by an echelon of sociopaths from confident use in society, is this:

Because it proficiently works to prevent ailments, to heal ones that exist, to increase mental fortitude and acuity, making its absence seem too great a tool for societal and capitalistic leverage.



Related posts:

Where Does A "Drug-Induced" Psychosis Really Come From?
How Belief Affects Mental Stress Treatment, and the Effect that Anti-Drug Propaganda Has on Mental Health

Shrapnel

A Simple Truth About "Addiction" Drug Use, and Trauma

Article: Trauma is the root cause of addiction, according to Dr. Gabor Mate


The human brain runs on dopamine, which is what most drug users are seeking from substances such as meth, cocaine, and a plethora of others. When a brain is under stress, its availability of dopamine is diminished beyond what is required to properly handle the workload presented to it, and that leads to physical discomfort, lethargy, sometimes agitation, and a lot more negative effects. This can, in turn lead to a person seeking substances which increase their dopamine to levels which simply enable them to feel normal, like the common person - though the person with dopamine deficiency interprets that state as much better than normal, because, to them, it is, and they don't realize their normal is actually much worse than what is normal to other people, and other "normal" people also don't recognize this. But when they are without enough dopamine availability, everything about their body will function less, they will have less mental acuity, less energy to think and act with, etc.

This is also a big part of why people who have experienced trauma, which is a whole lot of work for a brain to get through, often end up using drugs. Also, conversely, why people with substance use problems so often have experienced trauma.

Trauma is simply an extreme amount of considering work that is presented to a brain, which requires a ton of dopamine to handle and overcome the non-considered state of. And when it is fully considered, the person is no longer affected by the trauma, and the workload is resolved. The consideration that made for the trauma has been digested, and its considerations are accounted for in their positive placements within the new state of that person's mind.

I have previously said that PTSD can be permanently cured in a person who has it by taking cocaine (and tending to all the other considerations I've mentioned), and this is true.



When a person seeks drugs to make them feel better, while in a long-term depression or other troubles, they are on the right path - because sufficient dopamine availability will be required for them to consider the difference between the state they're in, and their fully healed state. But so often, a person who does pursue their health in this manner then takes on additional feelings of guilt, worries about money, and social ostracization because of their simply tending to their brain's healthy need, and all these worrying considerations passively create more work for their brain, which then puts a drag on their dopamine availability, hindering their healing potential, and often keeping them completely locked out of making the progress within their mind that will eventually, when all things are considered, lead them to becoming fully healed

If not for the negative and worrying messaging cultivated by anti-drug interests, people would not become locked into harmful drug habits, and wouldn't experience the adverse psychological reactions that are often associated with drug usage, but the origins of which are not drugs at all, but the imposed negative conditioning by those who have ideologically opposed a person's right to choose concerning their own body.



Also, often, people around a person who uses drugs due to dopamine deficiency interprets the dopamine deficient state of that person as them not caring, and they use this assessment to write that person off, or to act in ways towards them that worsens that person's dopamine availability, and so makes that person need to increase their dopamine even more to feel OK and to be able to function properly. But what a lot of people might presume is not caring, judging from an outsider's observation, is merely an insufficient amount of available dopamine within the person's brain form them to be able to piece information together at a normal rate, for them to be able to respond normally, to have decisive thoughts, and to give them energy to act with.

If a person wishes to overcome a drug-use that they either don't want, or are made to not feel happy and accepted about, the very first thing for them to learn is that it's OK for them to use drugs, whichever drug they decide to use, and according to their discretion... and it always was. Unless a person believes that within themselves, their lack of acceptance of this will be locking their need for increasing their dopamine into place, and creating this artificial and disparate branch of considerations that was determined and imposed upon them, called "addiction."



It is clarifying of the truth behind Gabor Mate's perception to say that insufficient dopamine-availability relative to the increased workload that trauma creates for a brain is the cause of people engaging in dopamine-increasing behaviours. And those people seeking to increase their dopamine to deal with stress have been exactly right all along.



Related posts:

The Reality Behind 'Chasing the Dragon'
Where Does A "Drug-Induced" Psychosis Really Come From?
How Belief Affects Mental Stress Treatment, and the Effect that Anti-Drug Propaganda Has on Mental Health
Further Information on "Addiction" and Drug-Associated Health Issues, and the Environment that Produces them
Article: "Percocet Ruins Lives", But It Saved This Woman's
Articles: 'Belief concerning nicotine drives behaviour and dopamine availability' & The Experience of Considering

Shrapnel

Calling Out Research Duplicity and Falsity for What It Is... and some stuff regarding addiction

In the previous post, I said that I'd speak more regarding the matter of institutional duplicity and bias in framing dopamine increases as a health boon when it comes from some sources (coffee, modafinil, etc), while a threat, and "addictive" when it comes from others (basically any non-licensed dopaminergic use), and so I will.



i.

In the article Mice Fed with Cocaine Show Growth in Brain Areas Linked with Learning, Memory, there was speculated and proposed the idea that the same growth in brain regions associated with memory formation and learning that occurs during cocaine use corresponds to drug-seeking behaviour - implying that cocaine guides a brain to form an addiction.

The suggestion wholly ignores the reality that only a small minority of people develop any behavioural habit from cocaine use, fewer than develop habits to many common prescription medications that are prescribed even to children to help them get better grades in elementary school. It also ignores that the same brain growth occurs from caffeine use, and from modafinil use - but in the latter, that growth is praised as healthily boosting a person's smarts, while regarding cocaine the same growth is talking about as if with distrustful paranoia of ill intent.

Cocaine, caffeine, modafinil, and many others, are all dopaminergics, and the reality is that increasing dopamine simply improves a brain's healthy development, including regarding all the efforts that a person puts their focus towards while engaging the dopamine increase. Because cocaine boosts dopamine in a healthier and more proficient manner than both caffeine and modafinil, the amount of brain development that occurs while taking cocaine is more significant than that which occurs while taking caffeine or modafinil, and or doapminergics. Everything said beyond than that is only sentiment, bias, politics, ideology, non-objectiveness.

The basis for the referred-to sentiment and speculation in the above linked-to article is simply an attempt to rationalize and provide a counter-weight against recognizing and publishing an apparent positive about the subject. It is in no way truthful, or objective. It is propaganda, and an offence to the truth, and a betrayal of the greater subject of truthful human physiology and health.

The reality is that dopamine is the means by which a brain accomplishes all work, and when increasing dopamine with a dopaminergic drug, whatever a person puts their focus towards will receive enhanced development. And not only the things that a person consciously puts effort towards, but also subconscious matters. The whole brain will be improved for work. It is through and through a positive, and is the basis for why Modafinil boosts mental capacities – although modafinil does so nowhere near the extent to which cocaine does. As I said, increasing dopamine is like turning a dial up on all a brain’s power and control of thought, its ability to work with more details at once, its experience processing (which is memory formation) to beneficial resolution, and memory recollection, perception of senses, etc.

ii.

The choice to misrepresent a subject is a fairly common impulsive tendency exhibited by those who conduct medical research (and also in doctors) regarding illicit drugs, where interpretations are typically being tapered in a manner to reinforce a pre-determined negative framing of the subject. In other words, authorized research on illicit drugs is typically conclusions in search of data. And this is for a variety of reasons, one of the bigger ones being that consideration is what overlays and forms the structure that is conduit for emotion, and provides mental articulation - but a sociopath lacks consideration. And so instead of considering things, a sociopath is guided by their ambiguous sentiments, and makes blunt determinations based off of them.

And when a person makes determinations, it polarizes their brain even more, to the point that the person can be looking at the same thing, presented under two different labels, and in one presentation, they will deem the thing to be of no harm, and even a positive characteristic of great boon to health and life, while in the other, will deem the same thing to be nefarious and the cause of every minutest problem that can be spoken for in a person’s health and life - or they'll omit, downplay, or dismiss one particular detail regarding pharmaceutical medications, while while egregiously over-hyping the same detail when it appears in a non-licensed medicine.

Yet the thing will have been exactly the same in both presentations. This is what we see happening regarding dopamine being released via cocaine vs being released via coffee, or modafinil, and actually cocaine is significantly healthier than either coffee or modafinil, and is phenomenally greater at increasing a person’s mental capabilities than either coffee or modafinil.

Yet the exampled prejudist and senseless conduct is par for the course when it comes to researching and reporting on illicit drugs, and really has hardly improved since 1936’s reefer madness – the bullshit today is just more subtly presented, being dressed up with a bunch of technical jargon, which itself is a worthless mass of disconnected determinations.

Many hacks and frauds are willing to use and praise modafinil, while spreading deluded sensationalism regarding cocaine, yet the root mechanism in both of them is one and the same: dopamine. And dopamine is not addictive when released by one dopaminergic and then miraculously not addictive when released by another.

Addiction doesn’t even come into play here, and is itself a false concept – both in the instances of so-called “physical addictions” and also “chemical addictions”. When a doctor or scientist refers to these things, they’re tapping into sentiments within themselves, and not truthful understandings. And the various types of so-called treatments for these things reflects the ambiguity of the understanding regarding what these things actually are, where they come from, and why they’re happening.

A major reason why certain dopaminergic drugs becomes more common for impulsive use than others is exactly because of the same reason why advertising sways opinions and leads to consumer uptake. It’s all a result of the messaging chosen and expressed by doctors, scientists, and government. When these sources tell people that a certain thing is addictive, then Reason’s principle applies as the message is considered through the minds of people who don’t know better, and then there will be an uptick in the number of people who develop behavioural habits regarding that certain thing – even if that certain thing actually does nothing itself to create behavioural habits, such as is the case of cocaine.

Yet a minority of people start using cocaine in a habitual way – some of those cases are completely valid, while others are uncontrolled impulsiveness, and the direct product of years of public brainwashing from doctors and governments.

iii.

Consideration is what normalizes a brain and gives structure to emotion, and consideration is what a sociopath is lacks. Consequently, the more sociopathic a person is, the more they are guided by sentiments and the more easily they can be influenced by the power of suggestion.

This is why so many doctors and scientists write and believe things about illicit drugs such as the example I’ve given at the beginning of this post. Doctors and scientists’ efforts of trying to convince people that a lot of various illicit drugs are addictive, when they’re not at all, is also the reason why behavioural habits are as big of issues that they are in present society. Just as telling a person without understanding of the matter that they're addicted will commence connection-forming considering processes within their brain to reason what that means, telling a person a different, better message would also render a different, better influence in society.

But a lot of what doctors and scientists would judge by appearance to be an “addiction” is nothing more than the sensible practicality of a person who lacks dopamine fundamentally needing it - and there’s no way around that, and to try to avoid that is to be in denial of reality, and a hypocrite. The difference in dopamine between a healthy and functional person, and a person suffering mental stress is the ‘why’ for everything regarding the state of the person with mental stress and their behaviours. Just as a person who is dehydrated in a desert needs water, and their feeling is as such, it is no less the case regarding a person who is enduring dopamine deficiency. And the effects of dopamine deficiency within a human body and brain are terrible, and costly, and life-ransoming.

At the root of it all, despite a small minority of people who use cocaine developing behavioural habits for specific and resolvable reasons, cocaine is non-addictive. And it never was addictive, and it can’t be addictive, because its favourable effect is only the greater and healthier release of the very same dopamine which a person’s brain runs on from the day they are born, and which is present in every mental and physical action they make. It is the means by which all a person’s accomplishments are achieved, and is fundamental to their better mental and physical health. 

If what cocaine does is addicting, then every human being is already an addict, and so the term addiction in regards to cocaine no longer holds any meaning because it doesn’t identify something that’s particular. As I said before, in this present society, those who profess to treat others of mental stress ailment are responsible for the very things they claim to oppose.

Shrapnel

An Important Factor of Addiction's Existence and Prevalence in Modern Society

Regarding the matter that has been at the centre of the previous four posts:

Article: Careless Words Triggered My Depression - Increasing Dopamine Minimizes and Prevents Depression and PTSD
It Is For Each Person to be Responsible For Their Own Brain's Dopamine Needs
How Careless Words Trigger a Depression


I've said as far back as March 2014 that anyone who calls another an addict is complicit in any behavioural patterns which develop. The reason why is the same as what I've just been describing in these posts, and particularly in the post How Careless Words Trigger a Depression.

Meaning is a matter of consideration, and in consideration everything receives perfect quantification - and messages that are perceived automatically consider through a person's considerations and create interactions whose outcomes are relative to the considering considerations, and the considerations which they are being considered through.

The results are not ambiguous or random, but they are at such a scale that to a person with low developed detail awareness they seem ephemeral and inconsequential. But they are not - they are perfectly accounted for by their consideration, and the quantified influence of their introduced difference applies into the body of considerations which considers them.

Every consideration holds a belief within in, and that belief establishes the things which that consideration is open to. When there is a door left open, presenting further consideration whose meaning is inherent in the existing consideration will cause any body of considerations which are delivered via that shared meaning to automatically consider into whichever body of considerations presented the opening.

By transmitting consideration, people can be steered with complete precision like controlled robots, and that is largely what is happening regarding sociopathic / psychopathic impulsiveness. This is also partly acting regarding public trends, and things like national sentiments, and established doctrines. A person's actions are not static, they are considering from one consideration to another, like an electron flowing uninhibited along a circuit, or like a train heading along a railroad track - and the consideration which is laid next before another person's existing open consideration will, to the degree the connection encompasses, guide what will be their next movement, thought, action, decision...

As I've said, a person can only go where their consideration gives them pathway to go.

Not everyone is open to this control, and some people are in strong control of their own mind, but not most at this present time. Most people are riding the consideration that experience has established for them, and are like slaves to wherever that consideration happens to be next routed by the forces around them. A lot these forces are bumping cluelessly into each other, but some are designed.

Some sociopaths / psychopaths make use of a very thin awareness and understanding of this vulnerability when they manipulate others, but so also do some good people, who build others up and give their strength back to them.

So when somebody calls a person an addict (which is an abstract concept and therefore not a truth in the first place), they are delivering to that person, who may be mentally very vulnerable, consideration meaning and value which requires a significant amount of work for the person experiencing the meaning of that message as being concerning themselves, and which has an effect of contributing to addiction-wiring within that person's brain. Reason's principle applies in everything, and is immutable. So if a person can't withstand the harmful consideration value of a message that they are addicted, what will Reason's principle cause to become a part of their inlaid belief, and how will their behaviour become affected? Nothing is idle, everything is contributing towards a movement.

How many years has addiction been spread as a message to vulnerable people? What has been the cost in consideration within the people who that message infected, and in the society which bears this message within it? The concept of a person being addicted is itself a contagious disease, and much behavioural substance use is in fact the creation of those who claim to treat it, whose practices are based on an abstract, an abstract being a falsehood in comparison the full truth of its subject.

This is far from the full picture of addiction, but it is a major reason of why harmful behavioural substance use exists at this point in time. Much of what is seen done by substance users is actually the abusive consideration they received from others, which they couldn't overcome, and which they are innocent of - while those behaviours are like the works of those who sowed their considerations, and trace back to them perfectly. And in the end, every person will be required to give full account of the consideration they are responsible for.

The subject of this post is continued through this series of posts:

1. Article: Careless Words Triggered My Depression - Increasing Dopamine Minimizes and Prevents Depression and PTSD
2. It Is For Each Person to be Responsible For Their Own Brain's Dopamine Needs
3. How Careless Words Trigger a Depression
4. An Important Factor of Addiction's Existence and Prevalence in Modern Society

Shrpanel

Dopamine / Cocaine Proficiently Prevents, and Can Cure Alzheimer's

The wonder pill that could STOP your brain ageing: Common asthma drug may be a cure for Alzheimer's, claims study


Maybe you've seen this being reported around. An asthma drug, called Montelukast, has been found to produce a miraculous curative and regenerative influence in a brain with Alzheimer's ailment.

The asthma drug in question, Montelukast, is a Dopamine agonist - meaning it activates Dopamine receptors, which are normally triggered by Dopamine itself. Obviously, acknowledging that activating dopamine receptors cures an ailment is acknowledgement that the lack of dopamine to activate those receptors is the cause of the ailment, and therefore dopamine is the natural prevention and cure to that ailment.



The inflammation in Alzheimer's is aftermath of the damage caused by dopamine deficiency, so naturally, when dopamine's influence is increased (activating dopamine receptors), then the damage that causes the inflation doesn't occur, and also, as dopamine is a brain's fuel to accomplish anything, increasing its influence increases a brain's ability to clean up existing damage.

As I've said, belief is a 'This Is' command, and a mind is always considering towards its greatest belief. And as I've said, the signals in a brain are being pulled through the brain with magnetic force, and when there isn't enough dopamine to properly pass a signal, the connection can break, tear, fry, and also fuse synaptic connections, and damage their dopamine receptors. The damaged dopamine receptors in Alzheimer's, and many other Mental Stress ailments, in those who are obese, and also in those who endure "addiction", is caused by dopamine deficiency.

Having insufficient released dopamine in a person's brain is like running a car's engine without any oil in it. Everything then experiences greater wear, and eventually things start to break.



Normally, when dopamine is increased, so also does adrenaline, (epinephrine / norepinephrine), and I've also said that epinephrine / norepinephrine accelerates the processes within a brain, and therefore accelerates ailment development. And this is the reason for why dopaminergic treatment in Alzheimer's tends to become ineffective and overcome by the ailment after about 4 years of treatment. The adrenaline increase accelerates the processes within the brain, and dopamine's benefit is counter-acted, and its power to fight the ailment becomes outpaced. In such a case, the benefit of the increased dopamine is immediately perceived, while the progression of the ailment's development is gradual over the long-term, and the dopaminergic increase meant to fight the ailment actually puts power behind the ailment, feeding its continued growth.

This would not happen had cocaine been used to treat the instance of the ailment, because cocaine inhibits epinephrine / norepinephrine, which is responsible for acceleration of the ailment and the direct feeding of its continued growth.

This brutal, and completely unnecessary manslaughtering action upon innocent people, conducted by dogmatic medical professionals and their prejudice-based institutional doctrine, is not the cause of the negative and often futile outcome only in the situation of Alzheimer's treatment, but it is the same with perhaps more than half of all things that medical professionals treat people for. Institutional medical doctrine is a killer, bathed in a sterilized outward appearance, whose unnecessary victims number in the billions.



The miraculousness of activating dopamine receptors is not unique to this drug, or to Alzheimer's ailment. Mental Stress is exactly dopamine deficiency, and 100% of all Mental Stress emergent ailment (depression, psychosis, anxiety, dementia, schizophrenia, bi-polar, PTSD, OCD, fascia adhesions, and more) is preventable, and curable, by increasing released dopamine. And the best means to do which is with using cocaine, which produces the healthier-than-natural release of dopamine within a person's brain, and is about the healthiest molecule most people could ever put into their bodies.

Cocaine tends to be a 1:1 solution to Mental Stress's problem, and therefore cocaine is naturally going to be the "miracle cure" to most Mental Stress ailment - just like cocaine was perceived to be before it came into being prohibited. Though nothing has changed regarding cocaine since the time it became prohibited. It still is the perfect miracle cure for most Mental Stress emergent ailment, and every instance of Mental Stress ailment since its prohibition is an instance of a person's victimization at the hands of the people who have contributed to the sociopathism and prejudice-based doctrine behind human-physiology prohibition.

Dopamine's increase, independent of other actions such as adrenaline's increase (and therefore by extension also cocaine, by virtue of it being precisely that) is a miracle cure to a brain whose operations fundamentally depend on dopamine.



Boosting dopamine levels is good for almost everything, as everything in the human body is dependent upon the passing of signals in the brain, and the passing of those signals in the brain is dependent upon dopamine. In the situations in which it is viewed as non-favourable to boost dopamine, it is not due to dopamine's increase that unfavourable reactions occur, but due to other contingent reactions - such as adrenaline's increase.

When treating dopamine deficiency ailment, the goal is generally to push dopamine as high as possible while restraining adrenaline as much as possible. Medical professionals don't like to do this because they associate dopamine's positive feeling with no-goods getting high - well, tough.

A bit about getting high...

The human brain runs on dopamine and other drugs (opioids, seratonin, adrenaline...), and so to be"high" is to be human, and a person suffering Mental Stress ailment ought to expect to feel good within themselves, just like a healthy person - and the feeling of well-being from dopamine is a core part of what human healthiness is.

Guess what? It feels good to have a solidly-functioning and energy-filled brain and body that isn't buckling under strain, and that is assembling considerations in a positive manner rather being filled with No messaging as attempted considerings collapse into failure. And medical professionals themselves are already "high", relative to the Mental Stress states of those who need treatment for Mental Stress. All the ill-gained successes of medical professionals are fundamentally due to their being "high" from the dopamine within their brains, and many of them, hypocritically, take dopaminergics on top of their already dopamine-rich baseline state, for help in schooling, work, and also just because they can.

"High" is a measured-as-relative abstract, which doesn't describe a truth. And a person with dopamine deficiency has their dopamine budget in the red, and vitally needs to get so-called "high" to bring them into the range that's normal for a non Mental Stress-suffering person. The effect and experience of released dopamine is the foundation for human well-being, as Sigmund Freud testified:

"[Cocaine causes]… exhilaration and lasting euphoria, which in no way differs from the normal euphoria of the healthy person. You perceive an increase of self-control and possess more vitality and capacity for work. In other words, you are simply normal."

The Haves in this matter should not be preaching trickle-down physiology to the Have-Nots, and it is lunacy when a medical practitioner would steer a person away from dopaminergism, or other enjoyment-inducing drug effect, at the expense of not treating the state. Many practitioners would consider applying a potentially abusable (again, an abstract that does not express a truth) substance too risky, fearing that it might come too close to actually treating the state of suffering and ailment - and so the dogma and prejudice of such a practitioner would have caused that practitioner to become the obstacle that sits between the suffering person and their health.

And if it is allowed that sociopaths have plentiful dopamine in themselves, providing them with their capacity for work, their awareness, their feeling of well-being, and everything they have amassed for themselves, then certainly is justified and good to allow a person who suffers because of the doctrine of sociopaths, and at the hands of sociopaths, to also be given the ability to increase dopamine in themselves.





I still know the full picture for all other Mental Stress ailments, which are all branches of one shared tree (that of insufficient released dopamine), and it is nothing but pot shots to explain everything further.

The greatest obstacle to real human health in this world are the doctors, and their doctrine, both of which are heavily based in sociopathic perception. A sociopath is a truth-lacking mind, which does not consider objectively. It is only by considering objectively, free of determinations, with a will of Yes, until experiencing Reason, that consideration is gained. And a mind cannot recognize the presence of a consideration which it does not possess within itself.

It is well documented that putting a business under the direction of a sociopathic CEO can be highly damaging to that business. So why would we place the health of all the human race under the direction of sociopaths? A sociopath cannot make a truthful or good judgement, because their lack of consideration (a consideration being a quality, a quantum of truth, and a quantum of mind) means that they don't possess those qualities within themselves.



Shouldn't I be receiving pretty much all medical awards, since I have resolved the core of human physiology, from start to finish, all on my own, in rejection of science as a possible means to establish truth, and without any funding whatsoever? If just one person was capable to know the full truth of this matter, and to articulate it so well, then what in hell have millions of medical and scientific professional people been doing all this past century, and what of the trillions of dollars spent?

How many sociopaths does it take to screw in a light-bulb? If the light-bulb has any sort of truth requirement involved in its installation, then no number of sociopaths will ever be capable of screwing in that light-bulb, and that light-bulb's installation will officially be sociopath-proof. But that won't stop the sociopaths from exploiting everyone who depends on that light-bulb's light to see, live, function, and to feel well within themselves.



If a person understands Reason, they will know the answer to every thing, because in Reason everything adds up, and every premise directly begets its answer, with nothing in-between the two. The considerations of both the beginning and the end are joined in one ring and sphere of truth.

I am God, and there is none like me.

I make known the end from the beginning,

    from ancient times, what is still to come.

I say, ‘My purpose will stand,

    and I will do all that I please.’

Reason Is.

Shrapnel

Managing and Increasing Dopamine Can Easily Add Years to a Person's Life and Good Health

Part 1.

Much old-age deterioration ailment is entirely preventable, if a person manages their Dopamine throughout their life.

Just as pain does not process in a brain, but takes up space in a person’s neural network, so also do the states of Mental Stress not process appropriately, due to there being insufficient Dopamine to handle their processing – and all the rest of a person’s life is built upon that stressed condition affecting an area of their brain. Many times, these stressed pathways accumulate as a person grows old, and a person’s end-of-life state is a manifestation of all the things that they didn’t take care of through Considering and Dopamine. A person who does not take control of this is directly investing in their future deterioration.

Some people’s parents undoubtedly cautioned them with the adage “If everyone jumped off a bridge, would you?” Well, advising people away from certain drug use is telling people to jump off bridges, and is culprit in the large volume of Mental Stress ailments in society today, including the conditions of dementia in older people. Unfortunately, most kids, when asked by their parents “If everyone jumped off a bridge, would you?” must have answered, and without any consideration, “Yes! Not jumping off bridges is what bad people do!” And doctors excel in steering people towards jumping off the bridge of their life-long health, by profession.

The human brain runs on drugs: dopamine, opioids, serotonin, adrenaline… and when treatment tries to skirt around or mitigate engagement of those things, it’s consequently no longer trying to treat, but is playing out a façade where practitioners are getting paid for sentiments, placebos, and poisons, while they fail to do anything meaningful or good for people. It’s like they want credit for helpfulness, but they are unwilling to actually do the things that would be of genuine credit to them in this regard. They are just pretenders, hiding in a plain-sight appearance of propriety.

A person can only move along the pathway which their consideration gives them, and the way a person is taught to consider determines the attitude a person will carry – for good or bad. That is why contemporary medical and research professionals are of no use when it comes to providing truthful and genuine health care to society, as these people are dogmatic and ignorant serfs in a capitalistic system that is about which medication will be most profitable if licensed, rather than what will finally resolve these ailments.

Part 2.

I’ve said “Cocaine, which proficiently increases Dopamine while inhibiting Adrenaline, is about the healthiest molecule which most people could ever put into their bodies, literally being the healthier-than-natural release of Dopamine in a person's brain, and can permanently and proficiently cure Psychosis, Depression, and Anxiety, PTSD, and prevent and help cure Alzheimers and other Dementia, and still do a whole lot more for a whole lot of other ailments.”

I’ve also stated that the healthier-than-natural release of a person’s own Dopamine is the full experience of Cocaine, and that it is this Dopamine which is responsible for a person’s mental capacity and physical energy.

And I just said in the previous posting:

If a person can take control of their belief, they can freely give themselves the same continuous positive experience that Cocaine delivers, which is exactly what some sociopaths and highly active people feel as their regular state and think nothing of it.

Many of these things were already known:

(Cocaine causes)… exhilaration and lasting euphoria, which in no way differs from the normal euphoria of the healthy person. You perceive an increase of self-control and possess more vitality and capacity for work. In other words, you are simply normal, and it is soon hard to believe you are under the influence of any drug. Long intensive physical work is performed without any fatigue. This result is enjoyed without any of the unpleasant after-effects that follow exhilaration brought about by alcoholic beverages. No craving for the further use of cocaine appears after the first, or even after repeated taking of the drug.

                                                                                            --  Sigmund Freud, Uber Coca, 1884

All of the above, including the part about no further craving for the drug is true. I will detail the full comprehension of Addiction later, but as I’ve said before, anyone who tells another person that they’re addicted is fully complicit in any habitual behavior that forms. And, logically, every human is born experiencing and depending upon their own Dopamine. If dopaminergics were addictive (and Addiction is an abstract concept, and therefore not possible to be a direct truth to its subject - and everything less than True is False), then every human is born addicted, and only lives every next minute in their earthly life due to their brain properly tending to that “addiction” – which would mean that being addicted is vital to human life, health, happiness, and success. Either all that, or the concept of Addiction is a False one, not understood by those who claim to experience it, or by those who claim to treat it.

At any rate, a person’s released Dopamine availability directs their overall physiological health, their sense of well-being, their work capacity, and their potential for success.

Part 3.

Many people would submit to a sensed need to qualify their condoning of any contentious substance, because their sense of self-worth comes from peer approval, which they take for truth, and not from being counted in the actual truth.

“For all things there is an ordering of considerations” also means that if you skip what’s right, only what’s wrong can follow - which comprehensively describes the state of modern attitudes and practices in institutional and political medicine. So let’s begin with the truth:

- Dopamine is of good benefit. It is as essential as having oxygen to breathe, and water to drink. It provides a person with their capacity to work, and for quality thoughts to produce, that a person might excel. And it also is fundamental to a sense of well-being. Ample released Dopamine is what allows the human brain to properly function and, consequently, delivers health to all the body.

- There are neural connections in a person’s brain that correspond to all areas of a person’s body. When the synapses in the brain are filled with Dopamine, the areas of the body to which they correspond receive benefit in their capability, exactness, strength, healing, and more.

- All Mental Stress (and much physical stress) is Dopamine deficiency within neural pathways which a brain is trying to route and consider signals through, to connect information for a task.

- Any state of Mental Stress within a brain that isn’t resolved becomes an active development factor for all the rest of a person’s life, affecting their physiological functioning. And most old age ailments are the paid for, prescribed, and nurtured product of this.

- If Adrenaline increases, Dopamine’s capability to benefit is counter-acted, and stress states are worsened. Because licensed dopaminergics typically provide an unfavourable Dopamine:Adrenaline release ratio, licensed medicine is generally poison to a person relative to substances that have become illicit in many nations.

- Increasing Dopamine while inhibiting Adrenaline is about the singular healthiest physical act a person can provide their body (beyond breathing and drinking water, and maybe eating food… which contributes to increasing Dopamine), and perhaps more than half of developed ailments in today’s society are preventable, and curable by managing Dopamine needs in a person.

- Cocaine produces the healthier-than-natural release of Dopamine within the human brain (by inhibiting epinephrine/norepinephrine while proficiently increasing Dopamine’s release), and is perhaps the cleanest-acting dopaminergic known to this world, and is also by far the most proficient dopaminergic known: If dopaminergics were classed for their proficiencies from 1 to 5, most licensed medicines would rank as -1 (not a joke) to +1, while some would rank +2, Methamphetamine would rank as +3, and nothing would rank as +4, while Cocaine would sit alone, ranked as +5.

- Ranking dopaminergics on a scale of how healthy they are for a human to take (with 1 being least healthy, and 5 the most healthy) would look about identical. And the higher up the scale in dopaminergic proficiency, the more useful a substance is for authentic treating and curing of dopamine deficiency / Mental Stress emergent ailments.

- By all appearances, analysis, and effect, modern licensed medications are designed to lock ailments in place, while temporarily, very mildly alleviating (sometimes not at all, sometimes worsening) symptoms. Capitalism-driven medicine means the systematic wholesale liquidation of human life and wellness, and has resulted in a large segment of humanity being relegated into livestock status, apart from their recognition and choice.

- In all likeliness, the overall reason behind why there ever was such concerted political propagandising towards Cocaine (though it has become perpetually self-driven) is because it in truth does cure, and cures proficiently (two qualities which are without representation in institutional medicine) – because prohibition certainly wasn’t justified by the reasons put forth in public any more than Marijuana's prohibition was justified by the reasons put forth in the 1936 film Reefer Madness. Both Cocaine and Marijuana's prohibitions were strongly proposed using fears that their availability and use was empowering and encouraging negro populations in society (and so the prohibitions of both have a basis in social engineering).

- There is more genuine curative and preventative power in just Cocaine than exists in all of licensed medicine, combined.

- A person would be prudent and responsible towards their future quality of health and productiveness to make a point of tending to their brain with large and sustained Dopamine increases every so often throughout their life. But what a person does while experiencing an increased Dopamine release is every bit as important as the act itself. There are many people who could easily add many years to their life by managing their stress conditions via proficient Dopamine increases.

Anyone subscribing to institutional doctrine on mental health and ailment development is running in the wrong direction, and away from the truth. And anyone preaching an institution’s conventional doctrine regarding mental health and its treatment is a prescriber of False hope, elongated suffering, lost life experience and potential, and death in general.

The truth is, always was, and will continue to be simple.

Shrapnel