Addendum to the Previous Post about Parkinson's Receptibility to Dopamine, and also Something of Psycheparous

Related post: Article: Asthma drugs may reduce Parkinson’s risk (yet another lap around the same track)


I've explained this before, and it deserves representation wherever talking about dopamine treatment for an ailment like Parkinson's, where the contemporary medical practitioner's presumption is that dopamine treatment of the ailment works at first, but eventually loses its effectiveness.



i.

With most all dopaminergics, when a person takes them, they're increasing both dopamine-availability, and adrenergic influence in their brain.

The more that dopamine is increased, the easier it is for a brain to connect information across synapses, to sync considering processes, and to process work to its conclusion and free up that pipeline space within a brain. However, as adrenergic influence is increased, the faster the brain tries to work, and the more dopamine is required to handle the increased workload of the brain. So, increasing adrenergic influence alongside dopamine is applying antithetical influences, and does a lot to undermine the goal of attending to states that are in need of an increase of dopamine, such as the dopamine deficiency ailment of Parkinson's.

When people taking dopaminergic drugs like meth get wired out, twitchy, and agitated, that's because of the adrenergic influence on the brain's processes over time outpacing the more temporary sought dopamine boost that those drugs give. The influence of the dopamine increase is immediate, and positive, but the influence on processes from the adrenergic increases is more inlaid, compiling over time, and lasting after the dopaminergic influence and benefit has worn off.

When taking dopaminergic Parkinson's medication, it initially helps because it is increasing dopamine, and that's always giving a positive work capacity boost to the brain, which immediately alleviates away as much of the top-layer negative impacts of the ailment as there is supplemented dopamine to address. But, at the same time, the brain is also being fed an increase in adrenergic influence, which will be feeding the source of the ailment all the while in the background.

So, over time, dopaminergics become less effective, not because dopamine stopped being what the brain needs, but because the adrenergic influence that was simultaneously being administered as a consequential component to the dopaminergic influence has contributed towards accelerating the ailment to the point that the dopamine aspect of the medication is no longer a significant influence against the ailment.

There aren't many dopaminergics that do much to inhibit adrenergic influence, but cocaine is one of them, and is what makes it such an effective treatment for mental stress ailments. I would say that if cocaine was used, rather than the various medicines that are currently used to treat Parkinson's, that there wouldn't be witnessed the same eventual ineffectiveness of the dopamine treatment as the ailment overcame its reach. And if used with understanding of Psycheparous to manage the movement of signals in a person's brain, then a full cure is in reach of anybody.

Keep in mind that what I've said would only apply to pure cocaine, as the things that street cocaine is cut with frequently add negative adrenergic influence of their own.



ii.

Conventional medicine is mired in an identity crisis, where it can't make up its mind whether it wishes to be good, or to be evil; whether it wants to cure people, or accomplish its ideology. When treating an ailment with part cure, part poison, then there isn't a full will present to cure that ailment, and the practitioner's interests are divided, and they end up failing to do good.



If asking a doctor: Do you want to cure this person, or not?

They might say: Yes, I want to cure that person.

And if it is then said to them: OK, so do what will cure that person.

Then their mind detaches itself from the context of the discussion, and they default into a programmed ideological determination of: We don't want to give people things that encourage non-medical substance use.

Which means that their honest answer to the question of 'Do you want to cure this person whose ailment is cause by lack of this specific thing, relative to the influence of these other things?' is: No, I do not want to cure that person - because the word 'cure' in that context is a stand-in which represents doing the very thing that is the person's cure. It's like a pointer, that references a container in which is held the considerations that fulfill the meaning of Cure for that particular person's situation.

Just as Jesus said 'you cannot serve mammon and God,' it is also true that a person cannot simultaneously serve ideology and still do what is good. An ideology is something that a person determines and sets up to replace the truth as their guide.



iii.

Just as considerations are polar, the signals that are considering through a person's brain present a workload for that brain. That workload carries a value to it, and dopamine-availability also presents a value of work potential. When there isn't enough dopamine to address presented workloads, it is possible for the workloads to do damage to that brain, as those signals are being pulled through the brain by Reason with force. Things can break, splintering one process into many that each need the same value of dopamine as the former one process did. Also, considering can collapse, and call fall into failure, including a failure that keeps considering over and over as a negative loop. And considerings that collapse into each other can form a black hole-like force, made by their compounding polarities all directing towards a point that draws in other consideration... and this is how granfalloons become created, as considerations are pulled out of the truthful context that gives them their meaning.

However, likewise, when a mind is filled positive truthful belief, the considering of that mind lifts it up with great strength into ever-greater truth, being the example of 'to whoever has, more will be given.' And many things will continually be resolved in that person, with them progressively filling up with light as they do so. Such considering represents the 'streams of living water' that Jesus spoke of, which he said become a 'spring of water welling up to eternal life.' As I've said, life is the movement created by considering, and considering is the movement created by considerations being considered by and flowing through other considerations.

Shrapnel

Added "Compendium for Psycheparous" Page

I've included to the topic headers a page titled A Compendium for Psycheparous, which contains a subject preface, followed by a compilation of many of the things I've said over the previous few years which relate to the subject. I hope that this is useful for newer readers.



If wanting to just read the header, here it is:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


All things are made of considerations.

A consideration has polarity, and is quantum of truth, and of mind.

On its own, a consideration has no value, meaning, purpose, or point. But when brought into context with other considerations, it gains all of these things.

Hope is the pillar of all consideration, and is what gives a consideration its polarity. A consideration will always follow the greatest hope.

Considerations are like capacitors, and can store energy within themselves, which can be positive or negative in relation to other considerations. Filling up one consideration too much, as by a determination, will cause it to collapse, break, or cause damage to other considerations around itself.


Belief creates context between considerations, so that they might be considered and reasoned into oneness. Belief is a 'This Is' declaration, upon which Reason acts, creating the movement of considerations that is Considering. All movement is created by considering.

Reason is a declaration of 'Because this is True, therefore these other things are certain - but these further things are certainly False'

Belief is a 'This Is' declaration, which invokes Reason, and causes Considering, which is the streaming of considerations that substantiates the belief, which continues until the considering experiences Reason and then resolves into a oneness, a singularity, a reasoned concept, which then applies back into the mind that considered its truth as a new ‘This Is’ declaration, and filters through all that mind's considerations that are able to receive it.


A determination is a falsehood by nature, which says 'these considerations, but not these others.' A determination falsifies an environment of considerations, while dividing and polarizing the considerations that make up a consideration structure, and reducing consideration overall.

When a determination is made within a structure of considerations, it strengthens the reinforcement of some considerations while weakening that of others, and can cause considerations to collapse into others, causing their compounding value to contribute towards the determination that is being imposed within the environment of considerations. The power of collapsed considerations can become like a black hole within a person's mind, where the leading consideration is still considering, but has been aligned towards a false point, causing the whole considering process to consider failure as True.

The polarization created by the making of a determination upon an environment of considerations creates walls, barriers, and gaps between considerations, and reduces the overall communication between considerations. Resolving the created differences will restore communication between considerations.

False reasons are created by the willed imposing of a determination, upon which Reason still acts, and which, when imposed upon a considering process, fails that considering by taking away its reason.

In a brain and everywhere else, electricity and signals flow to wherever there is a difference in potential. Belief's declaration of 'This Is' is what creates that difference.

The signals in a brain are polar and subject to magnetism, and a brain wires and re-wires itself according to how a person considers. And all evolution, and all changes in state are the product of considering, in response to belief.

Considering is the work that is performed by a brain, and is the means by which a brain processes all information.



All things are made of considerations, and for every thing there is an ordering of considerations. And every state can be changed into every other state.

Shrapnel

Looking at the Forms of Considerations and Reason Within the Human Brain, And Beyond

I came across this article today, mentioning the same subject as the article I linked-to in the previous blog post:

Brain Architecture: Scientists Discover 11 Dimensional Structures That Could Help Us Understand How the Brain Works


In that article there is this picture (click it to view the full size):

The right-side picture translates the structure of connections into geometric "architectural structures" (consideration structures) to show the organization of what the researchers don't understand but which I can tell you is the gathering of considerations into reasons to fulfill concepts, by way of considering and reasoning.









The representation picture on the right-side depicts some of what I drew up over a year ago:





... but which I have not started showing and explaining because I wanted to do it right, such as with an all-encompassing and clearly explained post, but I just haven't had the energy or calmness to pull it all together into the perfect explanation yet. But since some other people are starting to detect these things, I think this makes it pretty convenient and simple for me to just throw its explanation out along with what they've said - so I don't need to do as much to convince people that this is actually happening, or do that all on my own.



To start, I'll point this out:

Whatever model on the origin of this physical universe a person goes with, it comes down to this: interactions between things. More specifically, you might say they are interactions between the smallest pieces of things that could ever be.

Since these are the smallest of all pieces, not made up of multiple other small pieces, but each are the smallest, and only their one-dimensional thing - until they interact with another smallest-piece, at which point they gain the smallest piece of definition and become dimensional. And that 2-dimensional piece interacts with something else, and gains further quality.

If one smallest-piece interacts with another, it is a True evaluation, or a Yes.

As I said in this post: The Meaning of "Will > Considering > Reason" and Automatic Considering

"Truth is present only where there is context between Considerations. A lone Consideration lacks definition, value, meaning, purpose, and point - it has no Reason. All that a lone Consideration has is a choice: Yes, or No, to Consider another other than itself.

A choice of Yes or No becomes its Will.

Will is Absolute, and a blank canvas yielding the power of True to wherever it is allocated through its choice of Yes.

When a Will gives itself to the Considering of anything, it sacrifices its power of choice for the duration of the Considering, and its choice to Consider becomes the power of True for the other that receives Considering - and once Reason experiences, the relation formed by the bridging of the two bears a truth, and forms a new Consideration.

So in the end, the Considering experiences Reason and resolves."


And in this post: A Treatise of Existence

"A consideration starts with just a choice of Yes or No, to consider"


If considerations don't interact together, the communicated relationship between those considerations is as a No, or a False.

Just like everything you see on a computer screen is made up of 1s and 0s, which are gathered into what are called in computer programming "functions", which each add up to a single value, which is then "returned" or sent to the program and bears an influence upon it, it is the same with everything that is physically visible in the world: Considerations gather into concepts, which are to them reasons, and resolve into a single truth, which expresses a meaning to everything.

Everything that is happening in the world represents a movement of considerations as they are considering, and they are building forms and structures, where what looks like space between physical things actually shows no space between their considerations - and to make a change to the consideration structure somewhere will reliably result in an outcome for all other aspects of that consideration structure, even though they may not appear related or near to each other when looked at physically.



As smaller concepts interact together with similarly-sized (by volume of contained considerations) concepts, those full concepts can interact like two considerations interacting, and they can interact with more concepts, to reason together into greater concepts, with many more dimensions.

In fact, you exist in an environment made of considerations, and can only imagine or perceive something because its considerations exist to be engaged - and if they are reasoned, then that which was believed in will become real from the experience of the existence of the person who reasons it.

And as I said in this post: Considering & its Meaning

"... everything that is fully considered will find a new way to become True."


Your thoughts of things are referencing those things' considerations just like what is called a "pointer" in computer programming.

And every fully-reasoned concept can be communicated via a signal. In fact, this entire universe fits into a signal.


There is lots, perhaps everything more that I could say from there, but getting back to the article, it shows this representation image, which translates the structure of the information involved:


I can explain what it all represents.

The small pieces heading towards the large sphere are gatherings of considerations. Each point is a consideration, and the lines that connect them are the meaning they have to each other, which is context, and which is a bridge that is also made of considerations. They are held together by belief (which is a 'This Is' declaration, which invokes Reason to produce considering.

The large sphere to which they are drawn is a concept, and is a reason (referring to a different aspect of reason than before) awaiting its fulfillment. It is filled up with considerations based on the evaluation of truth, by reason, and the fulfilled concept adds up to one.

The smaller considerations are drawn into it by reasoning, which can communicate with all considerations that have truth in them across any distance, because they exist within each other.

As I said, "reasoning draws all considerations into itself" - or, herself.

And also, in the post Meaning for Psycheparous: Everything can be a portal to every other thing.



One the reason is fulfilled, it is all-True, and the information it adds up to can be converted into a signal and transferred throughout any other pathways, exerting influence upon all considerations and concepts which it evaluates as True to.


The research the article is about called those large spheres "cavities", but they are not. They are spaces filled with meaning, representing potential awaiting to be fulfilled. The unfilled spaces, which are what I was drawing with the dotted lines in these pictures:





They become filled with considerations - or, if a determination is made involving the reason that is an environment of considerations, it falsifies the concept or considering, and it fails to become fulfilled.

When Jesus said that he came to fulfill the law, the law is a concept, made of considerations, and he fulfilled that concept, so that it did not fail. Being fulfilled is not the same thing as no longer being in effect. It means it is in effect, in all the places that it is supposed to be.


One of the researchers, Ran Levi, says in the article: "The appearance of high-dimensional cavities when the brain is processing information means that the neurons in the network react to stimuli in an extremely organized manner. It is as if the brain reacts to a stimulus by building then razing a tower of multi-dimensional blocks..."

It is acting by Reason. There should be no surprise that it is all organized - everything is adding up perfectly, with no space between the meaning of the state of one consideration and the state of the next. The organization of considerations by truth and reason is perfection. Mathematics is accurate because it adheres to the same. I will show that at some point (as I said once already, here).


Everything you see everywhere is a manifestation of a form of considerations, that is similar to what has been displayed in the right-side representation picture from that article. I can explain much more of all of it, and hopefully I will, soon. I actually want to just not post for several months and then resume explaining when I am able to in a much more effective manner. But I see articles everywhere where people are not even recognizing what they are looking at, and it irks me into making a post, because I already know the full design of everything, which naturally includes everything that people are studying at making articles about.

And where scientists talk about ideas of space exploration, and fantasize about traveling to another planet or galaxy, I know how the relative distance between places can be made into whatever has a purpose for being - what is 400 light years away can be made just 40 light-years away, or even less - without any mechanical equipment. 10 years ago can be made yesterday, tomorrow, or now.

As I said in the last post, Jesus said of God: "And the Father who sent me has himself testified concerning me. You have never heard his voice nor seen his form."

I also know his form, and it is made of considerations.

And as Jesus said, "For whatever is hidden is meant to be disclosed, and whatever is concealed is meant to be brought out into the open."

In the place of considerations, everything is True or False, and nothing is hidden. All the things people try to hide are fully visible there, and everything is exclaimed clear as day.

The constructs of this world are filled with granfalloons, and the places where people have invested their support are filled with falsehoods. Many of those that people trust are liars and murderers, and many of those they condemn and conspire against are filled with significant amounts of truth, which the determinations of their accusers don't perceive, but only feel threat from as they evaluate False against it.

Where all considerations are revealed, there is no speculation, no opinion, no conjecture, and no theory. There is only the truth.



I have no idea what I'm going to do next, or what when I'm going to continue explaining these further subjects. When talking about dopamine a point was reached where to further effectively detail its interactions involved moving into the sphere of the movement of considerations within a person's mind, showing its multi-dimensional interactions that reveal how dopamine is applied to assist in the work of a brain. But that has seemed like a big subject from where I am right now - though it didn't used to be, and it won't be once again, after enough time.

This is because of another subject: What happens to all those connected considerations if their reason breaks? They are all still evaluating True forward down many pathways, but are no longer perfectly reasoned into one - and that creates a lot of confusion and pain within those considerations and the environment which all their broken pieces are considering into. Those considerations are still doing their job, but they are doing it in an environment that doesn't supply the perfect context for their output meaning to be perfectly related to all other considerations around. That broken environment then first needs to be mended by considering all things that restores the reason that was.

Shrapnel

Article: Scientists find transient multi-dimensional structures within the brain

Article: Scientists find transient multi-dimensional structures within the brain.



"The human brain is one of nature's most complex structures, and scientists are still a long way from understanding its mechanics."

Maybe they should try to understand through something other than a method of falsification, such as making determinations based on observation, which polarizes and divides considerations and separates a person from the truth - which is all considerations resolving into one by Reason.



"But a new study has come one step closer to unlocking its secrets by unravelling its immense complexity."

When you start from the conclusion and try to work backwords, it is difficult. But if you start from the beginning, each next piece is only straight-forward and built upon the understanding of the previous parts, being the only expressed meaning of the considerations that are already known.



"The research has revealed that the mind is home to shapes and structures that have as many as 11 dimensions."

Considerations are constantly forming shapes are structures according to Reason, as they seek to find their reason, where their full value, meaning purpose, and point is contained within them and connected to all other considerations. When the structures of considerations are broken, and when considerations are forced by determinations into granfalloons, it is like putting them in prison and torturing them.



"The research has revealed that the mind is home to shapes and structures that have as many as 11 dimensions."

The Combining of Considerations Forms Dimensional Space.



"The research used in-depth computer modelling to understand how brain cells organise themselves to carry out complex tasks."

It is by Reason. And to invoke it, it is not many things that need to be focused on, but just the one thing that means all the rest. The truth already Is.



"The complex geometric shapes form when a group of brain cells - known as neurons - merge to make what scientists call a 'clique'.

Every neuron connects to its neighbour in a specific way to form an object with complex interconnections.

The more neurons that join in with the 'clique', the more 'dimensions' are added to the object.

Shapes that are three-dimensional have height, width and depth, like any object in the real world."

Why not call them what they are? They are consideration structures for the formation of reasons. The structures are increasingly truthful assemblies of considerations, which become more truthful as they take in more considerations in a harmonious manner, and become more dimensionally-complex as they do so. And as they become thus, resistance between considerations decreases, until the truth is fully considered, at which point their form represents a singularity of all-True that has no resistance between any of its considerations, and in which all contained considerations are simultaneously accessible, and which any ordering of the contained considerations is also true. Such is the transformation of energy into matter, and matter into light.



"The objects discovered in this study don't exist in more than three dimensions in the real world, but the mathematics used to describe them can have five, six, seven or even 11 dimensions."

The dimensions that a person's own considerations are capable of perceiving are not always the same as the number of dimensions that are in effect. As a person gains consideration through reason, they gain perception, dimension, and interaction. Not all the same people you see on Earth are living in the same number of dimensions - but you will only engage them through considerations that are shared.

As I said,

"If there was full separation between any considerations (such as a person, a mind, a thought, a cell) and other consideration, the two wouldn't be observable within the same reality. The universe wouldn't experience the other, and the other wouldn't experience the universe. They would be two separate existences, not aware of each other and not able to experience each other - and so exerting no influence upon each other. They would pass right through each other without effect, and each would be to the other as if non-existent.

This means that whole beings that are made through the knowing of different considerations can live in shared location without experiencing one another's realm, or only experience the slight bit which they have in common - yet in Reason everything adds up, and so to each perception things would experience as normal, even though completely foreign realities were influencing one another."


And as Jesus said,

"For where two or three have gathered together in My name, I am there in their midst."

The more considerations that have reasoned together, the greater the presence of truth is.



"'Outside of physics, high-dimensional spaces are frequently used to describe complex data structures or conditions of systems, for instance, the state of a dynamical system in state space,' Professor Cees van Leeuwen, from KU Leuven, Belgium, told Wired.

'The space is simply the union of all the degrees of freedom the system has, and its state describes the values these degrees of freedom are actually assuming.'"

Yes. Again, the combining of considerations forms dimensional space, and the more considerations that reason together, the more complex in dimensions the space becomes. The full reasoning of all considerations in belief is Everything, being the restoration of all things. When consideration is separated, so too is the memory of certain things. When consideration is restored, so too are the memories made out of that union of considerations.



"'It is as if the brain reacts to a stimulus by building then razing a tower of multi-dimensional blocks, starting with rods (1D), then planks (2D), then cubes (3D), and then more complex geometries with 4D, 5D, etc.

'The progression of activity through the brain resembles a multi-dimensional sandcastle that materializes out of the sand and then disintegrates.'"

Their structures can be helping the considering of greater things, and once the next plane of consideration is reached, the structures can be turned back into energy and considered up into the greater structure, and those considerations reformed as a part of that greater structure, though not holding the same shape as before. The human brain is transferring energy into matter and matter into energy on minute scales all the time. How do you think consuming food and water becomes a moving arm or leg?



"Neuroscience has also been struggling to find where the brain stores its memories.

'They may be 'hiding' in high-dimensional cavities,' Professor Markram said."

The connectivity of considerations IS memory. Anywhere considerations connect in reason, things are remembered. When considerations fall out of reason, memory, knowing, and sight is lost. Memory is everywhere.

The dual meaning of Reason is 'All things are equal and everything is remembered' and 'When all things are equal then everything will be remembered'. Considerations connect with one another once they find mutual agreement, and in reason there is perfect equilibrium between all considerations.

When the state of reason is fully achieved, 'All things are equal and everything is remembered' is written within the form by its considerations.




Jesus said,

"And the Father who sent me has himself testified concerning me. You have never heard his voice nor seen his form."


I know his form. It is made of considerations. There are many good forms on considerations for which I am able to give the understanding of, with the way that considerations move within them. To start doing that I need to draw the forms, something I've been meaning to do for a long time, but would rather start detailing when I have the energy to consistently work at presenting it. Maybe I'll have to just put it out in small piecemeal, and leave the reasoning of the pieces to whoever reads it.

Shrapnel

Considering Reality, Perception of Time, and Spiritual Growth

Reality is a reasoning of considerations, and all considerations fully reasoned add up to one.

People calling themselves scientists, or physicists theorize of multiple universes, or different dimension, but there is one truth, made of all considerations, and a person exists in as much of it as they have been willing to reason as good within themselves, and perceived multiple dimensions can be merged into one by reasoning their considerations into one reality. And since what is perceived as physical is a manifestation of what is reasoned in consideration, what are called 'laws of physics' are changed, removed, or added to an experienced reality based on whether the consideration that makes up that reality increases, diminishes.


As I said in a previous post:

"If there was full separation between any considerations (such as a person, a mind, a thought, a cell) and other consideration, the two wouldn't be observable within the same reality. The universe wouldn't experience the other, and the other wouldn't experience the universe. They would be two separate existences, not aware of each other and not able to experience each other - and so exerting no influence upon each other. They would pass right through each other without effect, and each would be to the other as if non-existent."

And:

"Reasoning is Mind placing all Considerations so that they are ordered rightly, and so producing Truth, and further, what is Good - which re-defines Truth in the Universe by re-allocating the placement of its Considerations. Once a Consideration is re-allocated by Reasoning, what existed previously no-longer exists, nor did it ever exist. Its other placement is no-more, and will not be again, and record of it cannot be found anywhere. It is as if it never was, and is of no-effect.

This happens in and beyond the universe all the time.

What sits beneath such a change will never know it when it happens, but what sits above it will know it."


Think of the example made in the movie Interstellar:






What experiences to the astronaut of little consideration as abstract and complex is understood by the greater mind that they are within as one reasoned concept, and all its contained considerations can be accessed at once, in any volume, without inhibition. And each experience of a moment in time that a person exists within is already this, while the more considerations a person reasons together, the greater their moment of experience expands to, and eventually, for 'the one who endures to the end', as Jesus described it, all considerations will be restored into one eternal moment in which everything exists in its truthful form.

The greater the distance in consideration, the more abstract understanding of other places become. And with great enough distance, it is as if nothing is there to be perceived by whoever doesn't have the consideration within themselves to be able to perceive those things.

And as Jesus described in a parable, "And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been set in place, so that those who want to go from here to you cannot, nor can anyone cross over from there to us." The divide is the absence of consideration to form a bridge between the two places.

Even in your own states, you are being considered through other places and people. When theorists speak of every possibility existing, yet speak as though they exist in different spaces from one another, they express the determinations and separation they have from those places. A person who reasons all considerations together can exist in all of those places at once, and have it experience as one place, with the unified sight, experience, understanding, and all other aspects, of all of them. And if that person makes determinations which separate themselves from considerations some of those things are made of, then they will lose awareness, experience, and presence in the places they have separated themselves from the considerations of. A person is filtered through all considerations based on how their own held considerations cause them to evaluate against the truth.



When a mind considers information, that incoming information evaluates pre-held considerations to achieve substantiation of new incoming information. Both the pre-held information and the incoming information can be reformed by reassembling the considerations it’s made of, to reason the entire volume of pre-held and incoming considerations into one body of consideration. This is the digesting of incoming information. When a determination is made, considerations are rejected, and there is a divide created between a person and those considerations.

And the state of being made of all the considerations which fully reason to add add up to one is what 'made in the image of God' refers to.

Sometimes a person is not able to consider a thing because their pre-held considerations are too much  aligned against it, or the incoming thing rules against the person's own considerations with too much force, and opening up to that thing all at once could destroy the body of considerations that is the person’s mind and experience. This is why Jesus said: "Besides, who would patch old clothing with new cloth? For the new patch would shrink and rip away from the old cloth, leaving an even bigger tear than before. And no one puts new wine into old wineskins. For the old skins would burst from the pressure, spilling the wine and ruining the skins. New wine is stored in new wineskins so that both are preserved.”

What is perceived as time is the movement of some considerations relative to others, at different speeds, and different directions. What is called time can be contracted and expanded by considering, and the considerations that make up the experience of a particular time can be added to, so that that space and what it contains becomes more. Also, by reasoning more considerations into one, the breadth of time while in that place is greater.

What is viewed as 'passing of time' is a person having been considered beyond the form of considerations that is the place that is considered as passed. If that form of considerations became fully considered as True again by a person, then that would again be where that person exists. But if a person is not fully reasoned together with all their considerations, then they don't possess full control to do things like this, since, for considerations that are defining their disposition towards a person's effort as negative against their determinations will naturally be inclined to deny or do the opposite to what a person's tries to impose, and that person will be ruled against by their own consideration, because they carried falsehood within themselves, which is a disjointment between considerations that causes one edict upon all considerations to translate into opposite meanings to many of them.



What is fully reasoned is in all times at once, and reason is the state of all-True, and is eternal.

Considerations evaluate as True or False against other consideration, so the more considerations that have been reasoned into one within a mind, the more that mind knows, and the more truth there is in that mind. And those considerations, or the meaning of their absence are everything that guides a person, so when a person’s considerations are reasoned into one, that person is truthful. But when a person’s considerations are disjointed and against each other because of that person’s determinations, then it is impossible for that person to be truthful, even when they adhere to all the principles they have made for themselves to justify their behaviour.



There are many causes why a person may or may not be able to consider something, or to get control of considering that is happening within them, and potentially harming them greatly. And the answer to every posed group of considerations is particular. Like Jesus said "Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God", which means not bread, not a 'this' or a 'that', but by every last consideration. Again, 'made in the image of God' means that the truthful image of a person is with all considerations - and any left out represent falsehood. And since life if the movement caused by considering, where there is an absence of consideration, there exists death.

A simple prescription would be a determination, saying 'these specific considerations' out of all consideration. But the truth is all considerations taken into account, and ordered in the only single way that they add up completely. But belief is what invokes Reason, to cause considering. And so the greater a person grows their belief, the more consideration they will be able to engage and hold in their view at once. The smaller a person's belief, the less consideration they are able to hold within themselves. Meditation and increasing dopamine both can help a person be able to calm and organize their consideration, to bring them closer in reason.

Shrapnel

Articles Concerning a Couple of Other Matters Which I've Already Given the Understanding For

i.

Article: Study finds psychopaths have below-average intelligence

I said this long ago, on this blog, that the industry hype about sociopaths and psychopaths having high intelligence was the opposite of the truth, and a product of those who are making such assessments being of sociopathic disposition, themselves - and that it's because they regard peer-praise and the ability to manipulate situations to their personal benefit so highly, that they consider those things to be the picture of intelligence, to them.

I also said that doctor, and scientist, are two of the foremost professions populated by sociopaths / psychopaths - people who have been raised with a discipline-type which taught them 'this determination is good' vs 'this determination is bad,' putting up many roadblocks to considering within their mind and brains, and resulting in them lots of surplus dopamine to make them very functional, self-confident, and scholastically successful, while ultimately being ineffective for much beyond sucking up to the popular themes of the day, and looking for ways they can fit themselves into granfalloons.

That type of disciplining also conditioned their personalities to perceive the experience of dopamine being freed up within their brains due to concluding the work that is considering (which is the work of a brain for which dopamine is required) as though it were "reward" for fulfilling various determinations, since it replenishes in availability each time they cause the desisting of considering. This disposition renders them very non-appreciative and of the truth concerning the states of malady that come about explicitly because of dopamine-deficiency, and it makes them non-empathetic to the great suffering that their doctrine of fiction is responsible for causing for other people. Their mistaken perception results in them feeling justified in exploiting the dopamine-deficiency-caused states of suffering of others for the sake of their own personal self-gratification, which they justify to themselves as "reward" for conformity to peer-approved ideology.



[Side discussion]

That type of disciplining also conditioned their personalities to perceive the experience of the dopamine that freed up within their brains upon their conforming to a peer-approved determination (which ended some considering, freeing up the dopamine being used for that considering) as though it were "reward" for obeying that peer-approved directive. Of course, the actual state of things is that that perception of their was only a symptom of their enormous stupidity, which itself was a product of their being taught 'this is good' vs 'this is bad,' which prevented their own considering of matters within their mind and brain - which would have developed the consideration structure that is smarts.

That's why there is so much drug-related research that concludes things which is not supported by any of the evidence looked at in the study: The writer A) can't understand any of what they're looking at, and so they default to assuming it means a determination about how the substance is negative for health, because they don't know how to consider, and B) conforming to the peer-approved granfalloon makes them feel good, because it avoids considering, freeing up dopamine that was allocated towards figuring something out when they first looked at the matter.

In effect, people who are "reward"-motivated are all junkies, only looking to acquire their next fix as soon as possible, by way of falsifying whatever they're working on. That's why medical science hasn't moved one inch on the matters of dopamine and mental health in a century, and why I produced both those matters' complete understanding, from start to finish, within one year. The professions of doctor and scientist are filled with junkies who are only there for the high of feeling as though they're conforming to the peer-approved granfalloon, and whose only guidance in what they do is the appearance of propriety and authority of their peers, and who work against people who literally need dopamine to be healthy, well, and productive, just so that those doctor and scientist junkies can get their dopamine fixes by conforming to their peers' opposition of those people's lives.

I tell you the truth: The memory of those who work out of "reward" and to prevent acceptance of the truth of human physiological health will be like that given for Nazi guards who stood outside concentration camps, feeling strong, proud, and justified for upholding the murderous and self-aggrandizing granfalloon of their day. And those who call dopamine "reward" will be like early-USA slave-owners, who rationalized their positions of manipulated circumstance in society by framing Africa-Americans as sub-humans and animals, whose greatest possible semblance of civility and contribution to society was under the ownership and whip of their white owners. Those slave-owners, too, used the very same rationalization as "reward" (their being white vs others being black) to justify to themselves their disposition and ability to self-benefit in society, at the expense of those on the under side of their determination - and at the expense of the truth, itself.

The conforming Nazi guard and slave-owners of yesterday are the same people who call themselves doctors and scientists today, serving their institutions' fictions of ideological and capitalistic preference. The same evil found another form, in doctors and scientists, but it is the same evil.



[Back to the main topic]

I said that a psychopath / sociopath is someone whose mind lacks considerations, which are developed through the act of considering, which is the work of a brain that requires dopamine to accomplish. And so, since sociopaths / psychopaths lack the willingness to do the work that requires dopamine to complete, they end up having a lot of surplus dopamine, which is what produces all cognitive clarity and work-potential for a brain, and so those who have lots of it due to not using it for the work of considering have lots to apply to the few considerations that they do have, and make them very proficient in utilizing the few and basic considerations that they do possess.

In other words, due to their large dopamine availabilities (due to being non-considering, but conforming to determinations), sociopaths are highly functional in a society that has been tailored by sociopaths to benefit sociopaths.

Related post: Things to Consider About Sociopathism




ii.

Article: Could signals from the heart trigger fearful reactions based on racist stereotypes?

Thought originates in a person's heart, as belief, which is a 'This Is' command, which then travels as a signal to a person's brain, and filters through all their considerations, becoming articulated in the process. If able, a person's considerations will reason with the belief as it considers through them. And after having being fully considered, there is output a new meaning, which takes a manifest form, such as an action, the development of a new consideration, etc, and so, by way of Reason, what was considered applies back into the mind which considered it.

Related post: Articles: Study Suggests Genetics Could Be The Root Cause Of Schizophrenia (*big yawn*, I already resolved this) (part iv.)


Regarding this: "Thought originates in a person's heart, as belief, which is a 'This Is' command, which then travels to a person's brain, and filters through all their considerations, becoming articulated in the process."

... this is why Jesus said "The good man brings good things out of the good treasure of his heart, and the evil man brings evil things out of the evil treasure of his heart. For out of the overflow of the heart, the mouth speaks."

And Also: "But the things that come out of a person's mouth come from the heart, and these defile them. For out of the heart come evil thoughts--murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander. These are what defile a person; but eating with unwashed hands does not defile them."

And another excerpt, from Mark, says: "'Are you so dull?' he asked. 'Don't you see that nothing that enters a person from the outside can defile them? For it doesn't go into their heart but into their stomach, and then out of the body.' (In saying this, Jesus declared all foods clean.)

'What comes out of a person is what defiles them. For it is from within, out of a person's heart, that evil thoughts come--sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander, arrogance and folly. All these evils come from inside and defile a person.'"

That same also declares all drugs to be clean.



What does it look like, when a person believes in the truth, and that belief invokes Reason and causes considering? It follows the pattern that electricity makes for itself, as it moves through a medium - like can be seen at 1:15 of this video:

Or, like can be seen in the synaptic connections in a person's brain, which are the manifestation of belief.


And this manifestation that starts with belief, and, because of Reason, goes on to produce the truth of all things, is also what Jesus referred to when saying, "The kingdom of heaven is like a mustard seed, which a man took and planted in his field. Though it is the smallest of all seeds, yet when it grows, it is the largest of garden plants and becomes a tree, so that the birds come and perch in its branches."

And also: "The kingdom of heaven is like yeast that a woman took and mixed into about sixty pounds of flour until it worked all through the dough."

Just as yeast causes dough to rise, so do the considerations that emanate from belief cause a mind to rise up into the greater perception, and joining of the truth.


No study or science was required in producing the full understanding of these matters, but only considering them from the belief that is good, and with a willingness for truth, rather than for self-benefit and conformity to peer-approval for the sake of experiencing "reward."

And conforming to, and making determinations for the sake of experiencing "reward" is only different than a person stealing money (rather than truth) to buy crack cocaine in that the person stealing money to buy a dopaminergic drug to experience a dopamine increase may well have a legitimate dopamine deficiency that those stealing truth for their fix have prevented from being addressed through other means.




iii.

All movement is produced by considering, and a person can only act, or move from one state to another by Reason. To be able to consider, to create movement, a person must first have belief, which creates context between considerations and is a 'This Is' declaration, upon which Reason acts. When a person is unwilling to first have belief, their only other option to progress is by creating false reasons by making determinations, which progressively divide and reduce the connectivity of considerations, which forms their mind and being. A person who does not believe, but who makes determinations to benefit themselves, is continually exhausting their spiritual equity. And the state of no longer having any consideration to be move through is the "outer darkness" that Jesus spoke about. The absence of movement of considerations by being considered through other consideration, is death.

And this is also why this declaration from Jesus is truthful: "And this is eternal life, that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent."

And also: "I am the resurrection and the life. The one who believes in me will live even if he dies, and the one who lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this?"


The only way to know something is to have fully considered it, to have its full being considering through oneself, so that it is known - because everything is its considerations.

To have considered something, a person must first have had the belief which provoked and warranted consideration of it. So, if a person truly believes in the only concept which amounts to all considerations, all evaluating as True, all going into one another, producing the state of All in All, then there is no death within that person, but that person has eternal life inside of themselves, and will not see death, as Jesus said: "Very truly I tell you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life and will not be judged but has crossed over from death to life."

And also: "Anyone who loves me will obey my teaching. My Father will love them, and we will come to them and make our home with them."

Shrapnel

Articles: 'Belief concerning nicotine drives behaviour and dopamine availability' & The Experience of Considering

i.

Here are a few articles, which all are about the same study:

Belief in nicotine's powers can increase addiction

Belief about nicotine content in cigarettes can curb cravings

Level Of Smoking Addiction Determined By Smoker’s Perception Of Nicotine


Excerpt from the first article:

Smokers get a rush of dopamine when nicotine from a cigarette enters their body.

It's this chemical reaction that means so many people are addicted to smoking.

But scientists believe there is something else at play - a smoker's belief in the chemical reaction can also change their cravings. 

In a study, researchers have discovered that if smokers don’t think they are getting nicotine, the rush of dopamine never arrives.


Except from the second article:

The smokers who got the nicotine, or simply believed they did, reported reduced cravings and the scan recorded increased neural activity. 

'When they believed there is nicotine and they had nicotine, the craving correlated with these anterior insula activations — but when they did not believe so, that correlation was gone." Gu said.

"Even when they had nicotine, but did not believe there was nicotine, their brain did not respond [with higher neural activity] and they still reported as much craving as before," she said.

"Basically, you have nicotine and your brain is kind of on, but the twist here is you have to have nicotine, but also believe you have nicotine for the brain to be on," she said.

"So in other words, if you have nicotine, but did not think so — you thought you had some kind of placebo — then your brain is still off," Gu said.

While the biological pull of nicotine plays a key role in the addiction, a person's belief system can also exert a pharmacological effect, she said.

Researchers hope the study, recently published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, will tell them more about the mechanism of addiction.

"It looks like addiction is not just about the substance itself, but also the belief you need the substance to have a normal daily life," Gu said.

She said the study shows why cognitive therapy is so important in changing a smoker's beliefs.



ii.

The conclusion of this study claims to have discovered something which I've already explained in much greater detail.

Recently, in the post Article: "this is how social media affects your brain", I said:

It will be no different if a person considers pouring hot-sauce in their belly-button, or any other inane activity: Whatever a person believes in which consider within their brain, to make their person's well-being status as OK only evaluate as True when the concept that is their belief is fulfilled, which will always free up dopamine, since those considerings, conscious and sub forefront-conscious, will be resolved once their reasons are fulfilled, and considering is the work of a brain, and the work that requires dopamine to connect pieces of information in new ways.


And in the post Overview of Why Placebo Works, and Isn't Really Placebo After All, I said:

- The mechanisms of the metabolic pathway can be triggered in two ways: by decomposition of a molecule (which itself has a frequency that carries its meaning as a signal and equates to a ‘This Is’ declaration upon whatever it contacts), or by a reasoned thought-signal that contains the same declarative information


I also talked on the same theme in the post The Placebo Effect is Belief Freeing Up Dopamine to Help Healing Consider



iii.

I wish it wouldn't be said in the news articles about this study'd finding that "scientists believe there is something else at play," or that science would be mentioned at all, since the greatest understanding of these things comes from me, and I did not use any science to come to know them, or read any similar understanding from any scientist's work before I spoke these things from my own knowing. In fact, when I spoke them, it was in complete opposition to and rejection of everything I'd ever heard said from the perspectives of those calling themselves scientists. I knew the truth because of Reason, and I spoke it because it is the truth. To indicate science in this is to hijack some of the full understanding's considerations, and align them in ways which spoil the image of truth of the matter.


No science was needed to know, with certainty, that this happens, because its understanding is simply inherent in the knowledge that dopamine is a brain's work potential, and that considering is a brain's work for which dopamine is required, that considering is a streaming of considerations, that a consideration is polar, that a mind is all-factoring and inter-dependent, and that belief is a 'This Is' command upon which Reason immutably acts.

There is no test, observation, research, studying, institutions, regulations needed to know even the greatest of truths. There is simply belief, considering, knowing.



iv.

As Tesla said, “My brain is only a receiver, in the Universe there is a core from which we obtain knowledge, strength and inspiration. I have not penetrated into the secrets of this core, but I know that it exists.”

Well, what is received is a streaming of considerations, which is considering. And what enables considering is belief, which is a 'This Is' command, upon which Reason acts. But an environment that is heavily falsified, such as the mind of a scientist, cannot very easily consider, because the environment of considerations which is their mind evaluates as False against all realty, because of their determinations, and so cannot produce a truthful 'This is' command, to initiate considering. But if they could, then considering is similar to this scene in Transformers.

However, in that scene, the character who information is considering through is being raped by another force, and is not in control - which, by the way, is what doctors do to synapses in people's brains whom they impose their False institutional doctrine concerning dopamine, drug-use, upon. And that is a major part of what is happening in a psychosis, which, like many other things, is only caused by a lack of dopamine to connect information to stop the broken considering processes from forcefully pushing information through synapses not in sync with all other information. And this is also what is happening in the case of autistic children being sensitive to sounds, light etc. Unfortunately, licensed medicines are, relative to cocaine, complete garbage and poison when it comes to being effective at helping against these things, because of their far worse dopamine / adrenergic effect ratios, with the adrenergic effect increasing the workload of a brain, while dopamine increases the capacity for a brain to handle larger workloads.


Considering with reasoning is also like this scene from The Fifth Element, where the character learns via watching progressive scenes on a subject, reasoning their collective meaning as the scenes progress.

With considering, and reasoning while considering, the scenes are the reasoned meaning of all known considerations, and they can consider at even millions of times the rate of those which the Fifth Element character is watching in the given clip. And the individual scenes are made of great expanses of considerations, connecting across many dimensions. And the considered scenes themselves can even be living, with their contents being living experiences of the considerations which make them.

Einstein engaged a basic level of this when he thought in pictures, and came up with his theory of relativity. But neither Einstein, nor Tesla, though they engaged considering at basic levels, knew the greater reality of these things. They neither identified the movement and interaction of considerations as a knowledge to grow, and only focused on producing works in their fields via their individual abilities as they were without any recognition for what the difference was between their minds and other people's.

But, Jesus had already spoken the same as Tesla's "My brain is only a receiver" comment, when saying "By myself I can do nothing; I judge only as I hear, and my judgment is just, for I seek not to please myself but him who sent me." And considering grows into forms far greater and more magnificent than either of these examples, or the capabilities Tesla and Einstein possessed.



v.

While Tesla was fascinated by what the small could be made to do, and worked upon the small with a separation between it and himself, I know the full resolution, Reason, which gives the small its meaning and purpose, and by knowing Reason, I also know all the considerations which resolve into it, not as an outsider, but as an equal, and as one mind, with the shared sight of all who are in Reason. These considerations not only reveal the truth about what is, but they also are what is.

If I'm willing, I can write what resolves everything that all those working in the field of physics seek, and far greater, in a single post. But, as of now, I am not resolved to do this.

A truthful person and a sociopath speak from different devices. A truthful person only speaks what has already been fully considered, and which is already true and reason. A falsehood-bearing person makes determinations about what is, and speaks their determinations without knowing anything. In the truthful person, the truth is their leading considering, and their self is placed last. In the falsehood-bearing person, their own self is their leading consideration, and the truth is placed last. By determining ones self ahead of the truth, the possibility for the truth to present is falsified.

What good is all the information in the universe if it is achieved by determination, and so is outside of you, and therefore you and that information as one is not the truth? The movement of considerations evaluating True into one another is life, and as Jesus said, "Truly, I tell all of you emphatically, if anyone keeps my word, he will never see death," and also, "What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

Making determinations reduces connectivity between considerations. If everything a person has is by making determinations upon what they perceive as being outside of themselves, then there is little connection between the determiner, and all the things that they imposed determinations upon. So how will a person be able to consider through those things so that their life will continue? They will be vulnerable to the "outer darkness" that Jesus spoke of, and these words: "But God said to him, 'You fool! This very night your life will be demanded from you. Then who will get what you have prepared for yourself? This is how it will be with whoever stores up things for themselves but is not rich toward God."

So, what if all that a person has aligned themselves to is a granfalloon? That granfalloon as a whole does not consider into the truth.



vi.

Now, back to the articles about nicotine cravings being subdued by a belief which resolving anxious considering thereby freeing up dopamine-availability, thereby increasing a person's well-being and functionality.

At the end of the CBC article, this is printed:

Researchers hope the study, recently published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, will tell them more about the mechanism of addiction.

"It looks like addiction is not just about the substance itself, but also the belief you need the substance to have a normal daily life," Gu said.


A tremendous fallacy in these statements is the use of the term "addiction," which shows that the mind speaking such is carrying determinations which are causing their considering to collapse into falsehood.

Inherent within the term of addiction are considerations which speak that a person has no control, that a person is not acting by controlled choice, and that a person's behaviour is not acceptable. If a person accepts the term of addiction as True, then Reason will cause the considerations within their own mind, which form those messages, to align in a manner which is against their own personal strength and ability to overcome. Addiction doesn't exist in the truth, but is an imposition which sociopaths place upon others in order to dominate and exploit those people. By accepting the idea of addiction, a person is choosing to allow  be dominated by its concepts.

Accepting the message of addiction is the same as accepting the message of "you can't," which doesn't allow considerations to pass, which makes it impossible for a person to overcome. And this is the great deceit, theft, and treachery behind Alcoholics Anonymous, as well as government and institutional anti-drug messaging, which has been cultivating non-confident drug usage, which is the cause of all the problems which those in government and institutional medicine continue to try to attribute to drugs.


I spoke the following, in the post: Adendum - Migraines are Dopamine Deficiency - and also: The Importance of Tact in Dopaminergic Application - and also: The Importance of Considering the Truth

(I've also now added a link to the above, in this blog's previous post: Article: "Percocet Ruins Lives", But It Saved This Woman's)

Considerations have polarity, and receive their identity as relative to one another. And such a belief aligns certain considerations in a negative manner, and for as long as it evaluates as True towards the activity a person is engaging in, all signals relating to that activity will pass through that consideration, and receive an antagonistic influence, a quantum of negative consideration-value, which can infect the whole mind. And increasing adrenaline and noradrenaline will accelerate the considering of those things that are worries, and progressively amplify the presence of negative consideration-value in the brain until a time when things settle down and they can be reconsidered into normalcy. This is where drug-induced anxiety and psychosis come from - there is nothing inherent in the drugs taken themselves that cause thes)e things, but it is a contagion created by doctors, scientists, and government, out of their sociopathic inclinations to attempt to justify their own statuses by demeaning and harming those of others, who they deem as targets for their prejudice.
...
Also, ironically, when anti-drug propaganda is being administered to a society, there is a growth in sociopathism within that society, and a reduction in intelligence within that society, and the harms put into children and teenagers are those very ones which anti-drug propaganda would have them think come from drugs: Considering is the mechanism behind evolution, and a brain develops its connections through the course of considering. Those connections themselves represent the considerations of a person's mind, and greater Truth is manifest the more considerations are accounted for within an environment - and considerations which resolve into one form concepts. A determination is like a road-block that prevents considering from occurring - and the more determinations held in a mind, the less presence of truth there is in that mind, and the more selfish and sociopathic it is likely to be.



And just as I said in this post:

The considerations that are being held in the concept of science have their truthful placements elsewhere, and science must be discarded so that the truth may appear.

And as I spoke similarly concerning memories, in this post, it is the same regarding harmful drug-usage habits, where the imposed determination of "addiction" has forced the alignment of its involved considerations, in a case of 'if one then not the other', to dominate, subjugate, and exploit a person:

A person cannot overcome the traits of addiction while accepting the notion of addiction as a truth. It is a ball-and-chain that keeps people in the state of dependence upon the directives of sociopaths outside of themselves. People use drugs because they are addicted in the same sense that black people run fast because they have lots of practice from needing to get away after stealing something. Use of the denigrating term addiction is about maintaining a barrier that prevents the truth from being considered, and the upending of a long reign of sociopathic dominance over those people who are most vulnerable in society due to their low dopamine-availability, which is largely due to their considering the words of sociopaths imposed upon them as True in the first place.

Therefore, the first step to overcome any harmful drug-usage is to first believe and know that it is OK to use drugs, and that it always was. Drugs were never the problem, but harmful messaging coming from doctors, government, and scientists, rather than truthful consideration of the matter of drugs, is what really caused people to experience harms from drugs.

The symptoms of addiction cannot exist in a person unless a person first believes in the concept of addiction, and that it applies to them. And the concept of addiction did not arise because it was truth, but because sociopaths wanted a label to impose upon people other than themselves, to dominate and put them beneath themselves.



But the basis for people seeking dopamine-increasing drugs is simply that they are deficient in dopamine-availability, and therefore the solution is to increase their dopamine availability. Even where the solution is to overcome beliefs which are causing worried considering, which is diminishing their dopamine-availability, the solution is still to increase their dopamine-availability. And a person cannot overcome harmful beliefs without first having sufficient dopamine-availability to do the work of reconsidering, and therefore increasing dopamine-availability to give a brain enough physio-fuel for that work comes first.

And much of what causes diminished dopamine-availability within people who use drugs is the impression imposed upon them that there's something wrong with what they're doing. But everyone's brain runs on the effect of cocaine, and cannot perform any work without enough of it being there first.

Also, sociopaths only have lots of dopamine-availability because they have made determinations to obstruct consideration of the truth, reducing the amount of work which their brains are attempting, while means having ample dopamine-availability.

So, there very first harmful belief for a person who suffers dopamine-deficiency (which is all that "addiction" really is) to overcome, is the notion of addiction being anything other than a falsehood which keeps a person imprisoned. Without that, nothing further can be done. So, the first step to overcoming harmful drug habits is for a person to accept that it is OK to use drugs.

Related posts:

How Belief Affects Mental Stress Treatment, and the Effect that Anti-Drug Propaganda Has on Mental Health
A Simple Truth About "Addiction" Drug Use, and Trauma
Further Information on "Addiction" and Drug-Associated Health Issues, and the Environment that Produces them
Article: "Percocet Ruins Lives", But It Saved This Woman's
Woot, found the reference (that I had wanted to include in the previous post)!

Shrapnel

Further Information on "Addiction" and Drug-Associated Health Issues, and the Environment That Produces Them

i.

Anything less than True is False, and so it is in a mind, where concepts are made of considerations, which each have a polarity. For a concept to evaluate as True, all its considerations must unify into a True altogether. And if just one of a concept's considerations is aligned against the whole picture, and evaluating as True against that picture, then that entire concept evaluates as False.

If a consideration is aligned against the understanding that what a person does is OK, then that contrarily-aligned consideration is feeding a streaming +1 value against the person's confidence and security, which is a continual +(-1) being imparted upon their  wholeness. This progressively splits the person's mind with growing uncertainty, doubt, anxiety, which can lead to fear, and panic.

And when a person has taken a drug that accelerates the pace at which their mind works, then the descent into internal suffering is all the worse.



ii.

But be sure to make full note that this is not caused by the drug itself, and is a poisonous seed that was sewn in their minds by anti-drug messaging, and messaging of non-acceptance or non-approval for doing such things. The reality will still be that the dopamine which they seek from the drugs they take is still what their brain runs on, and what is needed to make the difference between their suffering and their well-being.

And then those who sowed that harmful self-doubting considering within the people who experience it purport to treat and "help" them, all the while profiting monetarily and reputation-wise off the states that they, and those of their professions before them created, and maintain in society. And then those people further "reward" themselves by fulfilling their determinations for what makes them personally a good dog, contributing to an ideology that is false, and their reward is a release of the same dopamine in their already over-dopamined brains as that which they work to prevent from being increased in the brains of those who need it most.



iii.

The choice to employ social engineering against people who engaged in drug use, which ostracized them and caused all the problems the institution then presents itself as being needed to look after was not done out of caring for the people who were being harmed, and a doctor who employs the institution's teaching does not firstly, and therefore genuinely care about the people they practice those teachings upon. But they are charlatans, who do the things they do, not with the truth, compassion and care for another person as their leading consideration, but because of what I've written in the post A Treatise of Existence, part 2:

When a person makes a determination, they align considerations against one another within their own mind, because of Reason, and the amount of space within their mind that they are able to exist in at any one given time, and have evaluate as True, is reduced, while at the same time, the number of considerations they experience as opposing what they’ve determined to be True increases.

Also, as a person increases the volume of consideration value within their mind that is negative, relative to their determinations, they will feel incomplete unless something fills that negative consideration value, something that they can label and target, and use to define themselves as good by defining good within themselves as being ‘not that,’ contrasting themselves against those things (for example, a physician often fills their negative consideration-value with determined concepts of people who use dopaminergics as having problems that need institutional defining and direction, and simultaneously define themselves as good for not being like this, and so are deserving of their determined concept of "reward," which is the same dopamine, only gained through false-pretenses).



iv.

All things are made of considerations, and whereas a person may do something and physical trace is no longer apparent afterwards, it is not the same with consideration. Everything is delivering consideration to everything else, and all consideration is accounted for in the truth. The consideration of what was done regarding these things remains, lingering in society, and its negative consideration value is tremendous. And here is what has been done:

Government, scientists, and doctors have spent decades disseminating false research and prolific messaging that instils uncertainty, nervousness, doubt, fear, feelings of non-acceptable drug usage, which causes mental agitation, divides a mind, and negative considering when a person takes drugs.  Then they work to convince people that they have a problem, when convincing them of such is the root cause of behaviour that is problematic. Then they use the expression of those things that were artificially put into people and society as justification for doing those things to people with their messaging and ostracization in the first place. They then feed institutions and "professionals" (who are charlatans that don't actually know anything truthful) who profit both monetarily and reputation-wise for "helping" people with the problems they and their institutions created.



v.

Further, because anything less than True is False, by imposing ideological determinations upon people who use drugs, that might convince them that there is a problem, that something is not fully right, that they would be better otherwise, they cause consideration towards the state of full well-being within the person to be aligned against their own state of full well-being, so long as they don't modify their behaviour, and in doing so, they not only create, but they lock-in, as perpetual, the person's state of feeling want and need.

And for those who they successfully convince of their determinations, to conform to them, who do so only to feel more accepted, such as the institution of Alcoholics Anonymous, are left in a state of perpetual imprisonment, not allowed to overcome that consideration that keeps them out of full-being. And because those people have accepted the determinations which are aligned against the thoughts and behaviour of allowing drug use, those people have accepted a prejudice into themselves. And these people are examples of who Jesus spoke of when he said to the Pharisees of his day:

"Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over land and sea to win a single convert, and when you have succeeded, you make them twice as much a child of hell as you are."



vi.

What is considered into a person become digested by their mind, and a part of their feeling and being. And just as with raising a child, a parent has the option of telling things which deliver positive consideration and build a child up and give them strength of character, or deliver discouraging and abusive consideration, which leads to all problems inside of the person, it is the same with adults: Truthful and constructive messaging will build an adult person, while antagonistic, demoralizing consideration will wear an adult person down until they are defeated.

Institutional medicine, government, doctors, scientists have chosen, for decades, to degrade, demoralize, deceive, to instil fear, worry, and doubt into people who use drugs, and to ostracize them for using drugs. If they had seen those people as equal and valuable, then they would have considered them as being equal and valuable. And if they had chosen to consider the person as equal and valuable, and delivered the messaging that affirms a person's right to choose, and to have confidence in their choice, then none of the problems associated which drug use would exist, because those problems are not caused by drug use at all, but by society's chosen reaction and attitude towards it.

It is exactly as written at the end of this article:

"It may well be that prohibition, and distribution of drugs by criminals, gives worse results for the outcomes we think are important, such as harm to the user and to communities through crime. But equally, we may tolerate these outcomes, because we decide it is more important that we declare ourselves to disapprove of drug use."

And it is because government, scientists, doctors chose to deny a person's right to choose over their own body, instead imposing their ideology upon people's bodies and minds, that they are equal to rapists: Because the effects of a person imposing their will upon another bears will always bear the same detrimental meaning upon the considerations of a person's mind, and that detrimental influence is the identity of rape. Do not judge by outside appearance, but judge only once having considered all things truthfully. And remember that I've said that the truth is one consideration giving itself to another with neither force nor resistance.

And all that people who practice rape as their profession have accrued for themselves in property and reputation is ill-gained, and stolen from those whose lives were raped by the messaging that was determined and imposed upon them. And this is the judgement that stands against those who did these things to other people: all the attributed ills of a drug-user's affliction are the debt owed by those who refused to choose a more considerate message to give to those people.



vii.

And beware of the behaviour that I described earlier:

Government, scientists, and doctors have spent decades disseminating false research and prolific messaging that instils uncertainty, nervousness, doubt, fear, feelings of non-acceptable drug usage, which causes mental agitation, divides a mind, and negative considering when a person takes drugs.  Then they work to convince people that they have a problem, when convincing them of such is the root cause of behaviour that is problematic. Then they use the expression of those things that were artificially put into people and society as justification for doing those things to people with their messaging and ostracization in the first place. They then feed institutions and "professionals" (who are charlatans that don't actually know anything truthful) who profit both monetarily and reputation-wise for "helping" people with the problems they and their institutions created.

Because this is typical behaviour of sociopaths: They make determinations to give themselves leverage.

A determination is a falsehood by nature, which says, 'these considerations and not these others', falsely strengthening some connections between considerations while simultaneously falsely weakening others, polarizing and biasing an environment of considerations.

Aligning some consideration against others creates a sense of absence for many considerations and those who share them, which is a perpetual need that does not heal unless the image of truth is restored. And so, for as long as that wound in the truth is prevented from becoming healed, it is an opportunity for those who made and perpetuate it to capitalise on the need, the suffering, and the confusion of those considerations which were attacked and abandoned. So, they impose a falsehood, which creates suffering and sense of need, and then they exploit the situation for their own personal gain.

And this behaviour is what institutional medicine is comprehensively about: Where governments whose pre-determined goal is to produce conclusions which support their drug-prohibition policies are also who license and regulate drug research (which establishes the doctrine from professional practice to academic study), where the companies that choose and fund the research that seeks and receives licenses are 'in the business of shareholder profit, not helping the sick,' where those scientists who carry out the selected, funded, and licensed research, and who produce its conclusions are "reward"-motivated to count-as-confirmed every bias which makes their employer more money and which gains them more recognition, control, and dopamine-availability increase, ... and where those who employ and enforce the narrative chosen by the former three groups have “reward” (increasing their personal dopamine-availability) as their primary motivation, and where those doctors, specialists, etc, have determined that “reward” within themselves to come from contributing to the doctrine that is a murderous lie.


As I've said before, Science, which is the practice of making determinations upon observation, is a method of falsification, and which is a tool of sociopaths, and which instils further sociopathism within a person's mind, and within society.


All the while, the truth is that mental stress, depression, anxiety, psychosis, ADHD, PTSD, autism, bi-polar, schizophrenia, alzheimer’s, parkinson’s, and a lot more, are all only caused by insufficient dopamine-availability in a person relative to the amount of work their brain is attempting, or being forced to consider, and that all of these ailments are completely preventable (and most of them fully curable) by taking cocaine in the right manner. Also also that cocaine, and other criminalized dopaminergics are far healthier and well-being producing that anything that exists within a doctor’s arsenal of effectiveness-reduced, side-effects increased, ailment locking-in pharmaceuticals, and that the real reason why cocaine is prohibited by an echelon of sociopaths from confident use in society, is this:

Because it proficiently works to prevent ailments, to heal ones that exist, to increase mental fortitude and acuity, making its absence seem too great a tool for societal and capitalistic leverage.



Related posts:

Where Does A "Drug-Induced" Psychosis Really Come From?
How Belief Affects Mental Stress Treatment, and the Effect that Anti-Drug Propaganda Has on Mental Health

Shrapnel