Saturday, 14 May 2016

A Treatise of Existence

It is because all things add up to One (which means that every quantum is quantified) that when a person believes, then, because of Reason, considering commences from within, even if it's at first subconscious: Because this is, therefore this also is True... therefore... therefore...

If a person grows their belief, then, because of Reason, all considerations will commence auto-assembling all things inside of themselves.

If a person believes poorly, Reason will still be. Pay heed to the meaning of Reason:
All things are equal, and everything is remembered.

It is a promise of restoration, or condemnation. Every consideration necessarily means all others, in the alignment by which all things add up to One.

The more that considering works considerations into alignment, the more a person can do, see, and the more ways that become open for their consideration to move through and engage other considerations with. What is impossible with little consideration is possible with greater consideration.

As I wrote, the forming of dimensional space is by the combining of considerations. If a person has considered into themselves all the considerations of a past they perceive, and the present, they will experience one reality which is the one presentation of all their combined considerations, ordered in the manner in which they add up to One. Effectively, though there will be one existence, they will exist in both those times at once. And even any past can be changed, by reconsidering the considerations that are its formation.

People calling themselves scientists, quantum physicists, speak ideas of other universes, where the laws of physics could be entirely different. Reality is that, as a person grows their belief and gains consideration, their consideration becomes windows to those other places. And if their belief keeps growing, those other spaces will be able to reason into one with the space in which the person originally existed, and then there becomes added dimension within the reality that they experience. These "other universes" are only considerations which people perceive as being beyond their own selves, because their belief is such that it identifies those aspects of existence as beyond their own awareness and presence. According to people's consideration, it will be. If people's belief is such that their consideration keeps the measurement that is not within themselves as being viewed apart from themselves, then they will perceive it as apart from themselves.

All other existences, dimensions, universes, can be considered into one with this one. Also, a person can lose consideration and merge into a different existence, though their perception will always have the one reality their belief is capable of holding the harmonized consideration for. Jesus said, "When will the Kingdom of God come?" Jesus replied, "The Kingdom of God can't be detected by visible signs. You won't be able to say, 'Here it is!' or 'It's over there!' For the Kingdom of God is already among you."

You can think of it as, when you believe, that Reason is causing the considering which realigns the considerations that make up your being to such an alignment that they begin to see more, and enter into more. Even a person's experience with what is physical is only due to their considerations having a considered relationship between the considerations that mean that experience. And if those considerations were entirely not perceived by one another, a person would pass right through those considerations, in all ways, and they would not be a part of the reality the person experiences.

Think of the biblical example of an angel being placed before the entrance to the garden of Eden. It is still there, but cannot be seen, or experienced, or entered into, because there is a consideration before it which this world has been separated from. When one consideration evaluates True into another, sight of mind is present, and a person's vision becomes lit. Considerations are light, and the beings of light, the angels, are the considerations. And if one is put before others, and those in front of them all have no perception of the one that is before the others, then they cannot see or experience them.

A determination hasn't a truthful meaning, and therefore it doesn't consider towards more good. It is like a wound in the fabric of existence. A determination separates a person from considerations, and reduces their experienced existence. It creates lines and divisions among considerations, and therefore among the people who have those considerations, and breeds opposition and harms.

Belief must be grown, until it accepts and encompasses all consideration in the manner in which all things evaluate as True, and in all ways. Only then will a person find their way home. A consideration starts with just a choice of Yes or No, to consider. Likewise, a person's belief and considering is always either leading them to the restoration of all things, or their diminishing.

Jesus said, "I am the true vine, and my Father is the gardener." And also, "If you do not remain in me, you are like a branch that is thrown away and withers; such branches are picked up, thrown into the fire and burned." And he is right. The vine is the power of True running through all considerations in the order that is good. If there is not the power of True connecting any two considerations, they will lose their association. Without the power of True between a person and the source of all truth, connection between their considerations will fade. But if belief is grown, then they will gain and strengthen connection between consideration.


Tuesday, 10 May 2016

How Determinations Cause the Polarity of Considerations to Affect Sociopathism


Considerations are polar, which means they provide a positive value towards whatever they point to, and a negative value for whatever they direct away from. And the signals in a brain are pulled along with magnetic force.

A mind is an environment made of considerations, and which adds up to One. Because considerations are polar, when a determination is made, a determination stating ‘these considerations, but not these others’ (because of Reason), it collapses consideration into a forced point (that is not truth-based), and all surrounding consideration are then pulled into alignment with that determination. The values given by considerations towards their destination is what creates the magnetism that moves and pulls signals through a brain, and so a determination then acts as a black hole of sociopathicness, with an event horizon that pulls any considering which comes near it in towards its centre of falsehood.

That is what is happening here:

Article: Over half of psychology studies fail reproducibility test

... and is the cause of the 61% irreproducable rate of psychology studies (which, as I said in this post, is a figure that is worse than natural randomness, and is a figure that means that psychology is steered towards the negative, away from truth), and is what happens whenever somebody believes in a determination, rather than considering what the truth is, apart from making any assumptions or determinations.

So, it is the considered truth that the majority of people who call themselves scientists are sociopathic, and so are incapable in their present state to ascertain what truth is.

And a determination which support a sociopath’s bias is like crack-cocaine to them, as making that determination invokes Reason, which then ceases the considering of things, with considering being the work for which dopamine exists in a brain to accomplish. Thus, dopamine is freed up when a determination is made, and a mind is relieved of some strain as its workload reduces. In the past, sociopaths have tried to justify their selfishness by considering this freeing-up of dopamine as being their “reward” for their being evil, lazy, non-considering, truthless sociopaths. In doing so, they are responsible for much of the mental health issues seen in society today.

Also, the figure of 39% reproducability-rate is still not going to be accurate, because that figure is still coming from people with notable amounts of sociopathicness within them, and the more sociopathic a person is, the more they gravitate towards Lowest Common Denominator-based perception (which is what a determination is, and often what people who call themselves scientists look for). This means that, while a consensus may be shared among a group of people who all adhere to a particular outlook and evaluation, that the evaluation and outlook of that group might be disregarding many considerations which they don't consider. But all considerations are accounted for in the truth, and each consideration makes all the difference, somewhere.

Also, the judgement of a 39% reproducability rate for human behaviour is a fallacy in that sociopaths and non-sociopaths are antithetical in their reasoning, how their minds work, and why they do the things they do, and the both of sociopaths, who are the majority of people in society, and non-sociopaths cannot be understood with a blanket teaching. What is good for one is not good for the other. And there exists every degree of different consideration between the state of sociopathic falsehood, and the truth, and they can only be engaged via consideration of each new state, and not with a blanket or even general teaching.

Sociopaths, who have reduced their own selves to Lowest Common Denominator behaviour and perception, tend to have lots of dopamine due to how little they are considering with their brains. And this makes them highly functional in a society constructed upon the imposed determinations of sociopath's, while those same determinations are what prevent good and considering people from being well functioning in the same society. Currently, less sociopathic people are being held in society as the prisoners of the more sociopathic people.


Article: Bias-oriented decision making

A bias is a falsehood, and a mind that makes decisions based upon contrasting biases holds bias, which is a falsehood, as True. And a mind that holds what as False as True evaluate False against the truth. The considerations a person expresses are the rolling out of a blueprint for how their brain is wired, and details all the determinations and consideration they have within them.

A person who holds a bias as True is a sociopath, and those who ascertained this study's conclusions are sociopaths, whose perceptions are based on holding as True determinations based out of the weighing biases. And that is but one way which a sociopathic mind can operate. Depending on the degree of sociopathicness in a person, judgement-making will occur in other ways - some more crude, and others more considering. But all degrees of falsehood-based judgement come from a mind that is sociopathic.

In various posts, I am giving details on how a mind moves by considering, and I will further show the way which a truthful mind establishes its choice, in other posts.

But as I said in the previous post:

"And even if I don't look, sometimes there are still multiple articles that come across my view, regarding research which those working on it don't understand, or are taking in a direction that doesn't lead to the truth. And all these people are studying things for which they've already made themselves ineligible to solve, by starting out by insisting on determinations which falsify the path of considering towards their truths."


Sociopathism is endemic throughout science, because science itself is the practice of making determinations based upon observation, and therefore is methodical sociopathism, and enables and nurtures sociopathism in whomever practices it.

But a worse instance of this polarity towards evil exists in partisan and ideological politics, and the event horizon which pulls consideration towards evil is what is responsible for mob mentality, and extremist politics. Those who are susceptible to this magnetism towards evil will deny any guilt or wrongfulness all the while that they move ever closer to their evil destination, as they have aligned their consideration away from the truth, and can no longer see the truth to see how what they do measures against the truth.

Considering experiences no gap visible in the physical world, and it can pull a whole people together into a place of evil, while, if those who are pulled by it exist beneath the Reason for the pulling, they will not be able to recognize the movement in any of their observation. If a people's awareness exists is a static pocket of consideration which by their will they determine to be True, then they can appear to themselves to be morally righteous - but in the sight of the full truth, they are an abomination.

Related post: A Greater Reasoning


The truth Is, and need only be considered. But a person who is reward-oriented has falsified their mind and their ability to consider the truth, because when they engage considering, their circuit of considering is already pointed towards reward, self, and falsehood. What then will it take for them to overcome the weight of all their falsely-aligned consideration?

With God, all things are possible, and for them who believe, all things are possible. Except to a person who has relinquished all control over themselves, belief is a power and a tool, which is a 'this is' declaration, which Reason enacts upon, to permeate existing consideration as the belief considers through the existing consideration, bringing positive consideration value if the belief is good, and causing the whole consideration structure to rise. This is why Jesus said "To what should I compare the kingdom of God? It is like yeast that a woman took and mixed with three measures of flour until all the dough had risen."

Don't be misled by the appearance of progress through scientific endeavors. That progress has not come from those who have faith in science, but from select individuals throughout this world's history who were more considering of truth than others, who discovered rulesets, made of particular truthful ordering of considerations, not by any observation or scientific process, but by considering, free of determinations. The people who discovered these things then gave their tiny examples of considered truth to the public, who then have been able to move forward so long as these rulesets are followed. But each determination based upon observation introduces falsehood into an environment of considerations. This is why Jesus said "Do not judge according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgement", which is the judgement that comes from having fully considered all things.

But there exists far greater than these currently understood rulesets, which do not allow a person to see or use them unless the person first enters into and become a part of them. There is no observation in the truth.


Friday, 6 May 2016

Articles: "Could STRESS trigger Alzheimer's" & "Brains can be trained to let go of unwanted thoughts by thinking of them in a new context"


Article: Could STRESS trigger Alzheimer's? Chronic stress 'causes key proteins to cluster in the brain, triggering the disease'

Yes, stress, which is precisely dopamine deficiency down neural pathways which a brain is attempting to consider information through, is mental stress, and yes, alzheimer's is a mental stress-emergent ailment. And yes, preventing stress, such as with cocaine taken with the right consideration, will prevent alzheimer's. And yes, cocaine, together with understanding considering, is panacea for all mental stress-emergent ailments, and will be vital to curing them in this world.

Article: How to banish bad memories: Brains can be trained to let go of unwanted thoughts by thinking of them in a new context

Memories, like all things, are made of considerations. When a person considers, it reorders the considerations of what they're considering, according to how they're being considered. What is helpful and what is harmful can contain the same considerations, but delivered in a different ordering. And all existence, which is made of considerations, adds up to Wholeness, and One, just as Jesus said. Likewise, so does every mind.

Context is the inter-connectivity between considerations, and that inter-connectivity changes if a matter is re-considered. And therefore, what that thing is, also changes. "Thinking of them in a new context" means to reconsider. And as considerations are polar, and considering is the means by which a brain directs formation of its connections, reconsidering creates a new consideration structure, and changes the understanding and meaning of the memory, re-making it as something new. It is a case of 'If one, then not the other'. But in Reason, all things are.

But to consider memories to their positive resolution, sufficient dopamine will be required - and without sufficient dopamine, this work cannot be accomplished in a human brain. And the more dopamine that is available, the easier this work becomes. How long it takes is relative to how much dopamine a person has access to, and whether there is any interference from doctors, scientists, government, police.

And as considerations are polar, as soon as a brain is saturated enough with dopamine, while restraining adrenaline, then those considerations are, of their own accord, going to start considering towards their positive resolution. And this is why I've said that cocaine can be used very effectively to cure PTSD, which is also a mental stress / dopamine deficiency ailment. But each mental stress ailment also involves matters of consideration, because the stress is the difficulty in moving considerations towards their positive resolution.


If I look for it, there are multiple articles written every day to which I know the answers and truth of. And even if I don't look, sometimes there are still multiple articles that come across my view, regarding research which those working on it don't understand, or are taking in a direction that doesn't lead to the truth. And all these people are studying things for which they've already made themselves ineligible to solve, by starting out by insisting on determinations which falsify the path of considering towards their truths.

The considerations that are considered through a determination that has been given the evaluation of True will be flipped in their polarities, and they will be leading a person towards falsehood regarding the matter that is being considered.

I have solved mental stress,  all the ailments which come from it, and I've also known the truth of mental health, and much beyond. No schooling was required, no funding, and no research teams. These matters were plain and straight-forward, and only needed someone to look at them without bias in their sight, and without personal reward as their motivation.


Anyone who has a mental stress / dopamine deficiency ailment only received that ailment because a) their consideration structure was vulnerable to incoming considerations b) the determinations of sociopaths are horrendously in-efficient to consider, because they don't evaluate as true, and all the disparities between their disparate parts need to be fully considered, before the matter is resolved, and c) all that considering requires dopamine to accomplish, and without sufficient dopamine, those matter cannot be considered, and they wreak havoc within a brain by imposing False determinations upon the work that the brain is doing. All mental stress is preventable, and curable, through considering, along with the dopaminergic effect of cocaine - but pharmaceutical medications will not work, because they are criminally inadequate in their dopaminergism, and they deliver a very non-healthy dopamine : adrenaline ratio, being inherently designed to capitalize on the existence of people's suffering, and not to move them towards resolution of their suffering.

A person only continues to have a mental stress ailment because of doctors, scientists, government, police, who all have teamed up to ensure that these things continue to exist in this world, while they receive False and undeserved positive reputation for their efforts, and are paid for their evil works. All mental stress was a super easy matter to resolve, as everything points perfectly, without contradiction anywhere, to just one answer. The issue behind mental stress ailments has not been immediately those ailments, but has been the sociopathism existing in the doctors, scientists, government, and police, who have invested their sentiments into a delusion, and who profit off of participating in that sociopathic abomination.


Jesus called the Pharisees of his day hypocrites, blind guides, and accused them "You strain out a gnat but swallow a camel."

It is also the case with today's doctors, who seek their sense of reward, which they achieve by believing they've adhered to a set of peer-approved determinations, and which is only a freeing up of dopamine, a person's natural cocaine, in response to them preventing their brain from considering the truth.

And while considerations are polar, and lead on in considering of the greater truth, determinations make a person blind to all considerations beyond the determination, which is a falsehood. And so a person who builds themselves upon determinations cannot see the truth, or enter into the truth. They will die because of their determinations, which is their non-willingness to consider the truth. But a person whose considerations lead into the truth will become a ring of truth, and will live forever.

And, like Jesus said "You strain out a gnat but swallow a camel", showing how merely for show, and for a self-gratifying sense of propriety all that the Pharisees did was, in causing great wrong for the sake of the tiniest good, so it is with all of the mental health treatments in this world's existence today: Sociopaths are responsible for the persistence of mental stress ailments, and then they address them with extreme inefficiency and False thinking.

Just as the "war on drugs" has been lost by those waging it every day since its inception, with drugs being victorious over them every day since its inception, so it is with institutional medicine's war against the truth of mental health, stress, dopamine, cocaine.


Why are the people, who have entered into a False doctrine that has been responsible for the disguised murder of hundreds of millions of innocent people over the previous century, paid to perpetuate their falsehoods?

Dressing in a uniform, working in a sterilized environment, receiving lots of peer support, having grants, a big salary, a positive social reputation... none of these things make a person good. It is only being good that makes a person good - and none of the people who have evaluated themselves by doing those things previously listed, are good. They and their influence in this world have been as evil as any - they've only been pretending, while acting out a sociopathic fantasy. The Nazi army is responsible for less death and suffering than Western doctors and institutional medicine, which have not yet been willing to consider the truth ahead of making determinations on what they want it to be, for their own personal exploitation and 'Reward'-pandering - which itself is the release of natural cocaine, and the very thing government, scientists, doctors, police, have prevented from being available in the brains of those who are in need of it.

And in this, those groups are like what Jesus said to the Pharisees of his day: "Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You are like whitewashed tombs, which look beautiful on the outside but on the inside are full of the bones of the dead and everything unclean."

And as I've been saying, I still know everything more.