I'm slowly preparing for an onslaught of dopamine, stress, and thought-production related posts. I expect to present what I believe to be the origin and manner of operation for mental stress, leading to its treatment and preemption - alluding to a believable premise for its eradication from a society.
I'm very close to beginning this posting roll-out, but before I do, I might get in one or two un-related posts... might. Just have to see how thought flows for the next few days.
Wednesday, 26 February 2014
Sunday, 16 February 2014
A Clarification for Michio Kaku and Albert Einstein
Original/ Correction / Clarification
Einstein: "God does not play dice with the universe"
Kaku: "God plays dice with the universe, get used to it"
When faced with suggested random-acting forces in our universe, Einstein took a hard-line stance and determined that, whatever understanding for these forces would eventually be, they could not possibly prove to be random. "God does not play dice with the universe."
Yet the seemingly-random dice-throwing was still there, for everyone's observation. Although it could have been in his thoughts, Einstein's stance doesn't overtly present as being significantly reasoned, but principled - conforming and defending what Einstein trusted was a necessary characteristic for an orderly all-being. I don't know this to any degree, but it's possible that his unwillingness to consider otherwise may have prevented him from moving forward with determining what was actually being witnessed - and maybe a similar adamancy affected other research he did, and cut off some considerations. On the other hand, such certainty may have let him breeze through many issues that someone without a resolute-belief may have contended with for a long time.
Michio's ventured hard-obtuse statement doesn't waste time denying what is obvious as existing, the appearance of what looks like randomized forces in the universe, and Michio then states that God, therefore, does indeed play dice.
I suppose Einstein and Kaku were both correct and incorrect, to a quantum.
Perceived universal randomness is a temporary confusion, and not a true-property, and it's achieved by definite-forces with definite-properties interacting in a clashing way that their consequences are non-determinable to humans circa now. The intricacies of their determining calculations may be beyond our comprehension, but they are still grounded in actual properties and set values.
But dice-rolling, too, is not an instance of actual arbitration or randomness. Merely, just too-fast a process, which is too sensitive to minute details, for us to measure and determine before the die stills. Atmosphere, gravity, weight of involved-components, hand-moisture, air-current, the material and texture which the die lands on, and dirt or blemish on the die, all factor in to determine a non-random result. The things that determine what a die will cast are all very real, and not random.
Randomness is a modern Magic or Miracle. Ultimately, there can be no Random because something needs to determine a result, and if there wasn't something defined determining a result, there would be no result, and no action.
Supposing that a universe creator's capabilities would super-cede the complexity of the apparent randomnesses: Ultimately, God still does not play dice with the universe. Maybe poker.
Accurateness in understanding is important, often essential to research, because people's internal concept or definition for a thing partially determines what they look for in results, and what will unintentionally stand-out to them, apart from their looking for it. Inaccurate conclusions lead to inaccurate, missed, and mis-purposed conclusions in further research - and I think that whether its in a short, long, or way-off term, undiscovered and erroneous information will affect a lot of people's lives.
Einstein: "God does not play dice with the universe"
Kaku: "God plays dice with the universe, get used to it"
When faced with suggested random-acting forces in our universe, Einstein took a hard-line stance and determined that, whatever understanding for these forces would eventually be, they could not possibly prove to be random. "God does not play dice with the universe."
Yet the seemingly-random dice-throwing was still there, for everyone's observation. Although it could have been in his thoughts, Einstein's stance doesn't overtly present as being significantly reasoned, but principled - conforming and defending what Einstein trusted was a necessary characteristic for an orderly all-being. I don't know this to any degree, but it's possible that his unwillingness to consider otherwise may have prevented him from moving forward with determining what was actually being witnessed - and maybe a similar adamancy affected other research he did, and cut off some considerations. On the other hand, such certainty may have let him breeze through many issues that someone without a resolute-belief may have contended with for a long time.
Michio's ventured hard-obtuse statement doesn't waste time denying what is obvious as existing, the appearance of what looks like randomized forces in the universe, and Michio then states that God, therefore, does indeed play dice.
I suppose Einstein and Kaku were both correct and incorrect, to a quantum.
Perceived universal randomness is a temporary confusion, and not a true-property, and it's achieved by definite-forces with definite-properties interacting in a clashing way that their consequences are non-determinable to humans circa now. The intricacies of their determining calculations may be beyond our comprehension, but they are still grounded in actual properties and set values.
But dice-rolling, too, is not an instance of actual arbitration or randomness. Merely, just too-fast a process, which is too sensitive to minute details, for us to measure and determine before the die stills. Atmosphere, gravity, weight of involved-components, hand-moisture, air-current, the material and texture which the die lands on, and dirt or blemish on the die, all factor in to determine a non-random result. The things that determine what a die will cast are all very real, and not random.
Randomness is a modern Magic or Miracle. Ultimately, there can be no Random because something needs to determine a result, and if there wasn't something defined determining a result, there would be no result, and no action.
Supposing that a universe creator's capabilities would super-cede the complexity of the apparent randomnesses: Ultimately, God still does not play dice with the universe. Maybe poker.
Accurateness in understanding is important, often essential to research, because people's internal concept or definition for a thing partially determines what they look for in results, and what will unintentionally stand-out to them, apart from their looking for it. Inaccurate conclusions lead to inaccurate, missed, and mis-purposed conclusions in further research - and I think that whether its in a short, long, or way-off term, undiscovered and erroneous information will affect a lot of people's lives.
Shrapnel
Sunday, 2 February 2014
All Truth is a Singularity, Navigable In-Full by Reason
. - - .
~~~ ~~~ / \ ~~~ ~~~
; . .. . ;
; ;
. . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .
. .
. . . . . .
.. . . . ..
.. . ... . . . .. . . .... . . . . . . . .... .. .... .. . . . ... .. . .. . . . . . ...
It seemed a slight bit deflating to re-post the title in the text-body space.
Ok, the impromptu:
Ok, the impromptu:
From an unknown much earlier age, and until only minutes ago, I presumed this phrase-minting title was at least semi-common knowledge, even that this was someone else's quote. In apparent fact, neither is so, and I am not finding even an incomplete presentation of what is possible through methodical Reason in online searches. That seems to implore a thorough establishment of Reason as a method for determining truth, rationality, outward deciphering of unknown factors (and their specific identities) towards accomplishing a goal, and more. That should be a future topic.
The spark of this net-location was reactionary to a purpose, which, at the time, generally felt comprehensive and conclusive in its planned components. But, making this themed-space seems to beget related contemplation, and Shrap's current backlog does actually have its own backlog, so this is presently an indefinite project.
Shrapnel
Wednesday, 22 January 2014
A Luminous Premonition
A blog of necessity, rather than preference.
I expect this location to deliver some notably high-value items (currently in backlog), providing useful original concept/work presentations, and much else that's new information. In addition to whatever else's, there could be a backlog-suggested inclination toward some science-phenomena including physical, medical, psychological, sociological... Update-frequency is likely to be erratic, even with a sizable backlog of -context-meaningful items for completion/posting. Definitely non-daily, and possibly non-weekly.
Although this location is non-specific in focus, there is likely to be serialization of some themes including dopamine, manageable actual stress eradication (I anticipate that should provide a preemption/denial of much mental-ailment), possibly the practicable concept-merging of scientific energy/old-school spirituality, other hypothetically final answers to some large-scale issues. Like anyone else, though, I've got to wait to see what comes.
Some particularly-significant work herein is direct-product of 13+ years of costly, income-void incessant severe and sometimes actually-unimaginable torture of pains, which recently produced in my recently proving treatment and cure for my own "untreatable" ailment(s) - with that undeniably-proof turning some highly-influencing dogma of med-science upside-down, and then promptly punting it out of the picture. That cure will be led up to, and posted in full. Because of all this, please donate when you find corresponding value in posts. Relevant support information will be found at the bottom of future posts, unless better practice becomes learned.
I expect to provide very coherent and comprehensive posting, but if something is posted in an inadequate form, I have some (hopefully temporary) challenges that come with my current condition, and the situation is this:
There are subjects of personal knowledge, with their information personally-phrased as concepts, each like a museum room filled with crazy artifacts of astounding intricate detail. Their presence in this room shows that they are collected and not still unknowns, and they are immediately-accessible. But the periphery to examine and regard them is so imposed-upon and under-powered that all that is seen at one time is a cone of light, with firming cut-off at the edges. That light floats the room in wander, and dazed.
Further, there is no available capacity to retain what's been recently viewed, to provide an assembling recognition of the whole area, so what can be parlayed is only what is currently having the light shining on it - which includes knowledge of the room itself, that it is a much larger thing than this cone-of-awareness.
The equal fullness of the whole museum-room is a certainty because the room's space itself only exists in reaction to there being a thing dictating that its space is there, and that by being intrinsically assembled to the other contents, which all form their room simply by being assembled together. Their defined, though dynamic-capable scope encapsulates a concept.
Concepts can be as individual pieces of information, assembling with others into larger concepts, and that larger concept assembly can contain not just other concepts, but also lone-infos that wouldn't otherwise fit with contributing-concepts, but are necessary to fill gaps between concepts
Until related information encapsulates in a unified personal understanding, the information is experienced as unsorted arrays, each requiring their own consideration. While in a concept, their culmination is considered and known using the same mental space and effort of thought that one of its countless pieces does if non-encapsulated.
I expect this location to deliver some notably high-value items (currently in backlog), providing useful original concept/work presentations, and much else that's new information. In addition to whatever else's, there could be a backlog-suggested inclination toward some science-phenomena including physical, medical, psychological, sociological... Update-frequency is likely to be erratic, even with a sizable backlog of -context-meaningful items for completion/posting. Definitely non-daily, and possibly non-weekly.
Although this location is non-specific in focus, there is likely to be serialization of some themes including dopamine, manageable actual stress eradication (I anticipate that should provide a preemption/denial of much mental-ailment), possibly the practicable concept-merging of scientific energy/old-school spirituality, other hypothetically final answers to some large-scale issues. Like anyone else, though, I've got to wait to see what comes.
Some particularly-significant work herein is direct-product of 13+ years of costly, income-void incessant severe and sometimes actually-unimaginable torture of pains, which recently produced in my recently proving treatment and cure for my own "untreatable" ailment(s) - with that undeniably-proof turning some highly-influencing dogma of med-science upside-down, and then promptly punting it out of the picture. That cure will be led up to, and posted in full. Because of all this, please donate when you find corresponding value in posts. Relevant support information will be found at the bottom of future posts, unless better practice becomes learned.
I expect to provide very coherent and comprehensive posting, but if something is posted in an inadequate form, I have some (hopefully temporary) challenges that come with my current condition, and the situation is this:
There are subjects of personal knowledge, with their information personally-phrased as concepts, each like a museum room filled with crazy artifacts of astounding intricate detail. Their presence in this room shows that they are collected and not still unknowns, and they are immediately-accessible. But the periphery to examine and regard them is so imposed-upon and under-powered that all that is seen at one time is a cone of light, with firming cut-off at the edges. That light floats the room in wander, and dazed.
Further, there is no available capacity to retain what's been recently viewed, to provide an assembling recognition of the whole area, so what can be parlayed is only what is currently having the light shining on it - which includes knowledge of the room itself, that it is a much larger thing than this cone-of-awareness.
The equal fullness of the whole museum-room is a certainty because the room's space itself only exists in reaction to there being a thing dictating that its space is there, and that by being intrinsically assembled to the other contents, which all form their room simply by being assembled together. Their defined, though dynamic-capable scope encapsulates a concept.
Concepts can be as individual pieces of information, assembling with others into larger concepts, and that larger concept assembly can contain not just other concepts, but also lone-infos that wouldn't otherwise fit with contributing-concepts, but are necessary to fill gaps between concepts
Until related information encapsulates in a unified personal understanding, the information is experienced as unsorted arrays, each requiring their own consideration. While in a concept, their culmination is considered and known using the same mental space and effort of thought that one of its countless pieces does if non-encapsulated.
Possibilities for onward posts include
Quantum physics and medical suggested resolutions, the sacrosanct made practicable, technology 'shoulds', forward-civilization expectations, possibilities and predictions, doomsday scenarios, a differently-framed "Theory of Everything"
. - - .
~~~ ~~~ / \ ~~~ ~~~
; . .. . ;
; ;
. . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .
. .
. . . . . .
.. . . . ..
.. . ... . . . .. . . .... . . . . . . . .... .. .... .. . . . ... .. . .. . . . . . ...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)