Abilities of considerations, eternal life, and teleporting across the universe made easy

Hello, it's been a long time.

Where I left things off was the conclusion of what would serve as the fundamental basis to understand the next level of comprehension of Reason. I was already knowing and largely understanding of the next things to discuss when I made my last post in 2017, but unable to continue to reveal it due to other things that have been impacting me. And since then, I wanted to continue posting about the topic, and drafted a bunch of posts for that purpose, but didn't publish them because I haven't been felt ready to start and also continue.

I'm still not prepared to continue writing as before - so, this could be a one-off post for who knows how long. But I just wrote-out this large message to someone, that contains a bunch of information relating to the next level of discourse on the topic of Reason, and it seems to me it would be good to post here. It contains many things I've mentioned before, and also things I haven't, and ties a bunch of them together.

When watching videos for casual entertainment or curiosity about various topics, often an idea or theory that's being explained or discussed matches something I already know and long-since understood as being explained through reason. And it seems to me in those cases they're probably talking about the exact same thing without understanding it, except as an abstraction and hypothesis, due to not knowing the things of Reason. It happens to me all the time that I hear something said in a video that makes me go 'oh, they're talking about that'. And it makes me think that millions of people will spend hundreds or thousands of years grasping at something that can be easily figured-out in minutes, when they aren't aware of the proper tools to approach the subjects with, or maybe if they are determined to explain them through a framework they've already invested their personal belief system in, rather than one that will solve it quickly while undermining their belief system.

I happened to click on this Why Files video as it was livestreaming and close to ending its livestream, right before the topic at 3:08:30 was discussed, which is about people who have internal voices and the ability to visualise things, versus people who don't:

Here's a link to the part I'm talking about: https://youtu.be/mtfJFUeFofA?t=11309

I listened to it, and having experienced both states of being for long periods of time in my life, and having an understanding of what the difference was for me, I thought it could be helpful to share it. I went to the Why Files website and started writing a message that might've been short, as I had no pre-planned length or scope for it, but I ended up continuing to write and delving into a lot of things that form, I hope, a larger comprehension of the topic, expanding into how it relates to all existence. Everything keeps doing that - just as if everything is connected and inter-dependent, and the state of any one thing necessarily means everything else.

I'm not going to edit the message I sent to Why Files, but just copy-paste the full thing of what I wrote. It starts below the line.

=============================================

Hello,

This is regarding your fascination that some people don't have an internal voice / visualisation capability, while some people do. If you read through this, I think you may find many things that fascinate you.

As someone who has gone through long periods of experiencing both the states of having an internal voice and lacking one, and lack of one is an inferior, impoverished state. It is a state of relative death of consciousness and experience, and such a mind doesn't really know anything, and doesn't know what the experience of knowing is. It is an emptier state, and one of less potential and perception, but it can feel a lot more comfortable compared to a disorganised mind.

Having that internal dialogue is the product of a considering and reasoning mind, and the ability to consider and reason is a superpower. But when the organisation of a mind's considerations are in disarray, or when the circuit of a person's mental consideration is broken, it causes great anguish and can make the considering process output inaccurate and contradictory ideas.

A mind (and everything else, both seen and unseen) is made of considerations - a mind is a body of considerations. And the more a person considers and reasons, the more they build the scaffolding of their mind. The considerations of a person's mind are what a person experiences, and how they engage with reality. The considerations that are fully reasoned into the wholeness of a mind, the more truth-perceiving, deep, and multi-dimensional that mind will be. A distraught mind is not experiencing a state of fully-reasoned consideration, but a state of difference between considerations that must be resolved.

A consideration is a quantum of truth, each consideration is a quality, and every consideration holds value. Considerations are also transitional and transforming gates for other considerations, and portals, which all considerations that pass through as they're considered undergo a slight change, gaining the quality of the consideration they pass through, and so gain dimension and nuance to their own identities. And the mind which receives the reasoned consideration likewise gains dimension and nuance to itself: the considerations of the mind that considered and reasoned the things they were considering have the qualities of those considerations added to their own identities when the considering process is fulfilled and a new concept is formed that then applies back into the mind that considered it, by both the considered concept and the mind that considered it evaluating as true, and therefore they, both being true, necessarily reason into a new oneness and greater wholeness that evaluates as the greater truth. The truth is all considerations reasoned as one, and considering is a way that considerations also learn about their own identities. As considerations reason together, the truth manifests further, and they become more realised in the truth.

Meaning is the context between considerations that substantiates their inter-connectivity and gives them purpose. A mind without an internal dialogue / visualisation process is bereft of sight of mind, access to meaning, and strong purpose. But a mind whose formation of consideration is broken, disarrayed, can experience immense discomfort and chaos, for the reason I'll explain.

Considerations are polar and are always considering one into the other. When considerations resolve a matter into a concept, they are perfectly in harmony and that concept unifies / it reasons into a oneness, with each consideration within the resulting reason having the sight of the whole consideration structure, as one. This is what human consciousness is. And all movement in the universe and elsewhere is created by considerations considering other considerations forward. And all things that are created are created by considerations resolving into a reason - a reason being a unified body of a multitude considerations that equals one.

When a circuit of considering is broken, its branches can collapse into others, creating resistance, antagonistic contradictions, confusions, and great stress. Or when a branch is broken and rather than going where they're supposed to, considerations are funneled into a seeming empty space (the empty space is also a creation of considerations), or into a consideration that doesn't know what to do with it, it can cause other problems - cancer being one example of such uncontrolled consideration.

If a person's internal consideration structure is in disarray, and has been made so that considerations that once were evaluating True are now evaluating false, all those negatively-aligned considerations are still working and they can cause the consideration structure to be torn apart, which is the destruction of that person's mind. And as considerations are polar and have value, if a person doesn't work to resolve their mind towards the truth (which is positive), the negative value of that mind will eventually accumulate (as considerations are always considering whatever they're in contact and engagement with), which will put pressure on the whole consideration structure, it can cause a consideration structure to collapse - which could be dementia.

When an important consideration has its polarity flipped, it can lead to a negative conclusion towards which considerations are funnelled, and which they then affirm. The negative / false reasoning is always trying to consider towards a state of self-invalidation, which doesn't exist, and so instead of radiating outward and considering things forwards, it behaves just like a black hole, progressively sucking all consideration towards a non-existent destination, making the polar force of that negative point of consideration grow in strength - in other words, it forms a black hole which sucks all consideration into it, whether in a mind, in a physical condition (like fascia adhesions), or in observable reality. In other cases, there is enough contextual difference between a considering process and a polarity-flipped consideration that it won't keep drawing in more consideration to it, and so won't keep becoming a stronger black hole. Visible reality is a 1:1 projection of what exists in consideration - which I believe is what is referred to as heaven in the bible.

The more considerations reason into oneness, the more the truth manifests and the greater light each consideration shines with. Considerations themselves have life in them, are made of light, and are messengers of the truth. They are the angels. And the truth is, itself, life: Everything is made of considerations, and eternal life is the eternal movement of considerations that have reasoned into a oneness. A mind that has fully resolved in reason is one that is fully truthful and cannot die. While the absence of the movement of considering is death.

Considering is life and is the ability to work towards greater, and also eternal life.

When a person has positively-reasoned consideration, it uplifts the person and it is the most valuable, comforting, and special-feeling thing there is, and is responsible for every degree of everything positive that exists and can be experienced. But when it's in disarray, then, according to its state of disarray, it produces all manner of everything negative in the world and inside of a person.

How does a person set the alignment of their considering? With belief: Belief is a power that declares "This is". And when that declaration is made, then Reason applies to it, and says "Because this is, therefore these other things are certainly true, but these further things must be false" - and considering is created. But a person's negative consideration can overpower their ability to set belief within themselves, which is the case with persistent mental health issues, where considering processes have become broken and are moving too quickly for the person to easily grasp and bring back into order through reconsideration.

When a person’s structure of consideration is fully unified, it is the most wonderful experience, and it is everything that a person experiences. But when it is disordered, then it is agony. Anxiety and depression are states of considerations being disarrayed aligned in ways that convey negative meaning to each other. Meditation can help reason them back into oneness, and the inability to focus during meditation, and the impulse to move or do anything, are precisely the spasms of the disjointed considerations as you pass through their broken connections. If you can withstand the incitement to react in meditation passively, without reacting or flinching to them, the affected considerations will progressively fix. When one disjointed spot of consideration is passed through without reacting, that spot will have gained a bit of healing and it will be easier to withstand the next time. It could take many cycles of your consideration passing through it before it is fully healed. But it is very-much worth it.

The explanation and possibility for all things is to be found through reasoning considerations. For example, you can instantly teleport across any space, and transition into other dimensions via consideration. As every fully-reasoned concept forms a ring of truth that is a particular ordering of all the considerations in existence (which, by the way, is why a circle / Pi contains all possible variables within itself). And the truth is all considerations reasoned into oneness, which is perfect harmony. And Reason, which is a state of "all in all", is a oneness where every consideration exists everywhere at all times. In that state, every consideration contains within itself an ordering of every other consideration. And so, if the ordering of considerations were represented by colours, you could say one planet's physical identity is Green, Blue, Yellow, Purple, Red, and that the identity of another planet that's 100 million light years away is Yellow, Blue Red, Purple, Green, instead of travelling 100 million light years across linear space to get there (the linear space between the two planets amounting to considerations whose meaning is manifested in your mind as that distance), the 100 million light years of distance doesn't exist if considering the second planet's presence is done by simply reasoning / forming the ordering of considerations that is its unique identity in the context of all existence.

And this is possible due to the abilities of considerations, which are to be invincible, invisible, or invulnerable to a considering process. And by that, they can be unseen by a considering process (and so the considering process doesn't see that they exist and can't find them), impenetrable to a considering process (so the considering process sees they exist, but cannot enter them to know them or whatever is conditioned on being considered through them), or unaffected by a considering process (and so while they allow a consideration to pass through them, they are not affected by the consideration that passes through them). So, as considering continues around the ring of truth in a mind that's located on the first planet, whose ordering of considerations is said to be Green, Blue, Yellow, Purple, Red, the abilities of considerations I mentioned can be invoked (via belief, a command of "This Is") to engage the meaning of the second planet's location, experiencing first Yellow, Blue Red, Purple, and then Green, and forming a reason that creates a new context between a person's and where they are.

In fact, the limitation of your, or anybody's perspective of reality is due to a lack of communication between considerations. When two considerations have no connection to each other, they will pass through each other, as though each other's existences are non-existent to each other. And this is happening to you and other right now, with greater realities and universes that you don't have connectivity to through consideration passing through you, and you not being able to enter into them. An example of this is when an angel (a being of light and messenger of truth - a consideration) was placed in front of the garden of Eden that made it no longer possible for man to enter into. You won't find it on the world if the consideration is such that it cannot perceive the reasoning of that location. You'll only perceive and experience the reality that the dimensions of your own consideration make possible for you to perceive and experience. And that is the same with all people, everywhere.

Dante's 9 circles of hell can show a bit of an example of how this can manifest. There are also layers of progressively more positive existences. When considering reaches a certain point, having gathered a certain amount to add-up to a new realisation, it unfurls and adds a new layer of consciousness - such as a higher level of reality, in which things are upgraded from what you currently perceive. So, people, by their beliefs and considering, are always in a state of ascending or descending.

I heard in a video about theories why humans haven't found alien life is that one theory is because alien lifeforms have evolved beyond physical life and are made of light. Well... it’s possible for a person to accomplish that same thing in one lifetime. It’s what teachings in certain holy books aim to guide people towards.

And to consider something is to process it. The faster something is considering at, relative to how fast your consideration is moving, the harder it will be to grasp. And at some point, the difference becomes so disparate that the faster-considering one is no longer perceivable in the slower-considering one. It will be as if it faded out of existence to the slower one.

A raw form of energy such as lighting or electricity hurts a person because it is considering with such force that it overpowers a person's own consideration and breaks through their own consideration. But if a person can consider it quick enough to fully consider it through themselves, opening their considerations as needed to allow it to flow through, it won't affect them at all. And if they can consider quickly enough to process its full meaning and understanding, they can gain control of it without needing any exterior tools. And if a person's considering can sync with the speed of the faster-moving considering, the voices of the faster-moving considering can be heard and potentially communicated with.

In previous years, I'd been writing about this topic at www.shrapnelreason.com. I had to stop because my own consideration structure, through certain events, become such that it was prohibiting me from explaining more - even though where I last left off in my writings was just the completion of the groundwork for much greater understanding that is what I’ve since really wanted to talk about, and always intended to come back to.

In a reason, considerations have a shared identity, and the end of one consideration is also the very start of another - it is neither specifically the end of one consideration and the start of another, it is an important part of both. On their own, considerations have no value, meaning, purpose, or point. But in a network with other considerations, they gain all those things. And the value, meaning, purpose, and point of each increases the more other considerations they are fully reasoned with. Maybe neurons experience a similar existence.

I apologise if there are any unclear parts of this texts. I don’t feel like reading it all to proofread it, but know it contains a lot of substance.

BTW, thanks for your interesting videos!

Shrapnel

Looking at the Forms of Considerations and Reason Within the Human Brain, And Beyond

I came across this article today, mentioning the same subject as the article I linked-to in the previous blog post:

Brain Architecture: Scientists Discover 11 Dimensional Structures That Could Help Us Understand How the Brain Works


In that article there is this picture (click it to view the full size):

The right-side picture translates the structure of connections into geometric "architectural structures" (consideration structures) to show the organization of what the researchers don't understand but which I can tell you is the gathering of considerations into reasons to fulfill concepts, by way of considering and reasoning.









The representation picture on the right-side depicts some of what I drew up over a year ago:





... but which I have not started showing and explaining because I wanted to do it right, such as with an all-encompassing and clearly explained post, but I just haven't had the energy or calmness to pull it all together into the perfect explanation yet. But since some other people are starting to detect these things, I think this makes it pretty convenient and simple for me to just throw its explanation out along with what they've said - so I don't need to do as much to convince people that this is actually happening, or do that all on my own.



To start, I'll point this out:

Whatever model on the origin of this physical universe a person goes with, it comes down to this: interactions between things. More specifically, you might say they are interactions between the smallest pieces of things that could ever be.

Since these are the smallest of all pieces, not made up of multiple other small pieces, but each are the smallest, and only their one-dimensional thing - until they interact with another smallest-piece, at which point they gain the smallest piece of definition and become dimensional. And that 2-dimensional piece interacts with something else, and gains further quality.

If one smallest-piece interacts with another, it is a True evaluation, or a Yes.

As I said in this post: The Meaning of "Will > Considering > Reason" and Automatic Considering

"Truth is present only where there is context between Considerations. A lone Consideration lacks definition, value, meaning, purpose, and point - it has no Reason. All that a lone Consideration has is a choice: Yes, or No, to Consider another other than itself.

A choice of Yes or No becomes its Will.

Will is Absolute, and a blank canvas yielding the power of True to wherever it is allocated through its choice of Yes.

When a Will gives itself to the Considering of anything, it sacrifices its power of choice for the duration of the Considering, and its choice to Consider becomes the power of True for the other that receives Considering - and once Reason experiences, the relation formed by the bridging of the two bears a truth, and forms a new Consideration.

So in the end, the Considering experiences Reason and resolves."


And in this post: A Treatise of Existence

"A consideration starts with just a choice of Yes or No, to consider"


If considerations don't interact together, the communicated relationship between those considerations is as a No, or a False.

Just like everything you see on a computer screen is made up of 1s and 0s, which are gathered into what are called in computer programming "functions", which each add up to a single value, which is then "returned" or sent to the program and bears an influence upon it, it is the same with everything that is physically visible in the world: Considerations gather into concepts, which are to them reasons, and resolve into a single truth, which expresses a meaning to everything.

Everything that is happening in the world represents a movement of considerations as they are considering, and they are building forms and structures, where what looks like space between physical things actually shows no space between their considerations - and to make a change to the consideration structure somewhere will reliably result in an outcome for all other aspects of that consideration structure, even though they may not appear related or near to each other when looked at physically.



As smaller concepts interact together with similarly-sized (by volume of contained considerations) concepts, those full concepts can interact like two considerations interacting, and they can interact with more concepts, to reason together into greater concepts, with many more dimensions.

In fact, you exist in an environment made of considerations, and can only imagine or perceive something because its considerations exist to be engaged - and if they are reasoned, then that which was believed in will become real from the experience of the existence of the person who reasons it.

And as I said in this post: Considering & its Meaning

"... everything that is fully considered will find a new way to become True."


Your thoughts of things are referencing those things' considerations just like what is called a "pointer" in computer programming.

And every fully-reasoned concept can be communicated via a signal. In fact, this entire universe fits into a signal.


There is lots, perhaps everything more that I could say from there, but getting back to the article, it shows this representation image, which translates the structure of the information involved:


I can explain what it all represents.

The small pieces heading towards the large sphere are gatherings of considerations. Each point is a consideration, and the lines that connect them are the meaning they have to each other, which is context, and which is a bridge that is also made of considerations. They are held together by belief (which is a 'This Is' declaration, which invokes Reason to produce considering.

The large sphere to which they are drawn is a concept, and is a reason (referring to a different aspect of reason than before) awaiting its fulfillment. It is filled up with considerations based on the evaluation of truth, by reason, and the fulfilled concept adds up to one.

The smaller considerations are drawn into it by reasoning, which can communicate with all considerations that have truth in them across any distance, because they exist within each other.

As I said, "reasoning draws all considerations into itself" - or, herself.

And also, in the post Meaning for Psycheparous: Everything can be a portal to every other thing.



One the reason is fulfilled, it is all-True, and the information it adds up to can be converted into a signal and transferred throughout any other pathways, exerting influence upon all considerations and concepts which it evaluates as True to.


The research the article is about called those large spheres "cavities", but they are not. They are spaces filled with meaning, representing potential awaiting to be fulfilled. The unfilled spaces, which are what I was drawing with the dotted lines in these pictures:





They become filled with considerations - or, if a determination is made involving the reason that is an environment of considerations, it falsifies the concept or considering, and it fails to become fulfilled.

When Jesus said that he came to fulfill the law, the law is a concept, made of considerations, and he fulfilled that concept, so that it did not fail. Being fulfilled is not the same thing as no longer being in effect. It means it is in effect, in all the places that it is supposed to be.


One of the researchers, Ran Levi, says in the article: "The appearance of high-dimensional cavities when the brain is processing information means that the neurons in the network react to stimuli in an extremely organized manner. It is as if the brain reacts to a stimulus by building then razing a tower of multi-dimensional blocks..."

It is acting by Reason. There should be no surprise that it is all organized - everything is adding up perfectly, with no space between the meaning of the state of one consideration and the state of the next. The organization of considerations by truth and reason is perfection. Mathematics is accurate because it adheres to the same. I will show that at some point (as I said once already, here).


Everything you see everywhere is a manifestation of a form of considerations, that is similar to what has been displayed in the right-side representation picture from that article. I can explain much more of all of it, and hopefully I will, soon. I actually want to just not post for several months and then resume explaining when I am able to in a much more effective manner. But I see articles everywhere where people are not even recognizing what they are looking at, and it irks me into making a post, because I already know the full design of everything, which naturally includes everything that people are studying at making articles about.

And where scientists talk about ideas of space exploration, and fantasize about traveling to another planet or galaxy, I know how the relative distance between places can be made into whatever has a purpose for being - what is 400 light years away can be made just 40 light-years away, or even less - without any mechanical equipment. 10 years ago can be made yesterday, tomorrow, or now.

As I said in the last post, Jesus said of God: "And the Father who sent me has himself testified concerning me. You have never heard his voice nor seen his form."

I also know his form, and it is made of considerations.

And as Jesus said, "For whatever is hidden is meant to be disclosed, and whatever is concealed is meant to be brought out into the open."

In the place of considerations, everything is True or False, and nothing is hidden. All the things people try to hide are fully visible there, and everything is exclaimed clear as day.

The constructs of this world are filled with granfalloons, and the places where people have invested their support are filled with falsehoods. Many of those that people trust are liars and murderers, and many of those they condemn and conspire against are filled with significant amounts of truth, which the determinations of their accusers don't perceive, but only feel threat from as they evaluate False against it.

Where all considerations are revealed, there is no speculation, no opinion, no conjecture, and no theory. There is only the truth.



I have no idea what I'm going to do next, or what when I'm going to continue explaining these further subjects. When talking about dopamine a point was reached where to further effectively detail its interactions involved moving into the sphere of the movement of considerations within a person's mind, showing its multi-dimensional interactions that reveal how dopamine is applied to assist in the work of a brain. But that has seemed like a big subject from where I am right now - though it didn't used to be, and it won't be once again, after enough time.

This is because of another subject: What happens to all those connected considerations if their reason breaks? They are all still evaluating True forward down many pathways, but are no longer perfectly reasoned into one - and that creates a lot of confusion and pain within those considerations and the environment which all their broken pieces are considering into. Those considerations are still doing their job, but they are doing it in an environment that doesn't supply the perfect context for their output meaning to be perfectly related to all other considerations around. That broken environment then first needs to be mended by considering all things that restores the reason that was.

Shrapnel

Considering Reality, Perception of Time, and Spiritual Growth

Reality is a reasoning of considerations, and all considerations fully reasoned add up to one.

People calling themselves scientists, or physicists theorize of multiple universes, or different dimension, but there is one truth, made of all considerations, and a person exists in as much of it as they have been willing to reason as good within themselves, and perceived multiple dimensions can be merged into one by reasoning their considerations into one reality. And since what is perceived as physical is a manifestation of what is reasoned in consideration, what are called 'laws of physics' are changed, removed, or added to an experienced reality based on whether the consideration that makes up that reality increases, diminishes.


As I said in a previous post:

"If there was full separation between any considerations (such as a person, a mind, a thought, a cell) and other consideration, the two wouldn't be observable within the same reality. The universe wouldn't experience the other, and the other wouldn't experience the universe. They would be two separate existences, not aware of each other and not able to experience each other - and so exerting no influence upon each other. They would pass right through each other without effect, and each would be to the other as if non-existent."

And:

"Reasoning is Mind placing all Considerations so that they are ordered rightly, and so producing Truth, and further, what is Good - which re-defines Truth in the Universe by re-allocating the placement of its Considerations. Once a Consideration is re-allocated by Reasoning, what existed previously no-longer exists, nor did it ever exist. Its other placement is no-more, and will not be again, and record of it cannot be found anywhere. It is as if it never was, and is of no-effect.

This happens in and beyond the universe all the time.

What sits beneath such a change will never know it when it happens, but what sits above it will know it."


Think of the example made in the movie Interstellar:






What experiences to the astronaut of little consideration as abstract and complex is understood by the greater mind that they are within as one reasoned concept, and all its contained considerations can be accessed at once, in any volume, without inhibition. And each experience of a moment in time that a person exists within is already this, while the more considerations a person reasons together, the greater their moment of experience expands to, and eventually, for 'the one who endures to the end', as Jesus described it, all considerations will be restored into one eternal moment in which everything exists in its truthful form.

The greater the distance in consideration, the more abstract understanding of other places become. And with great enough distance, it is as if nothing is there to be perceived by whoever doesn't have the consideration within themselves to be able to perceive those things.

And as Jesus described in a parable, "And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been set in place, so that those who want to go from here to you cannot, nor can anyone cross over from there to us." The divide is the absence of consideration to form a bridge between the two places.

Even in your own states, you are being considered through other places and people. When theorists speak of every possibility existing, yet speak as though they exist in different spaces from one another, they express the determinations and separation they have from those places. A person who reasons all considerations together can exist in all of those places at once, and have it experience as one place, with the unified sight, experience, understanding, and all other aspects, of all of them. And if that person makes determinations which separate themselves from considerations some of those things are made of, then they will lose awareness, experience, and presence in the places they have separated themselves from the considerations of. A person is filtered through all considerations based on how their own held considerations cause them to evaluate against the truth.



When a mind considers information, that incoming information evaluates pre-held considerations to achieve substantiation of new incoming information. Both the pre-held information and the incoming information can be reformed by reassembling the considerations it’s made of, to reason the entire volume of pre-held and incoming considerations into one body of consideration. This is the digesting of incoming information. When a determination is made, considerations are rejected, and there is a divide created between a person and those considerations.

And the state of being made of all the considerations which fully reason to add add up to one is what 'made in the image of God' refers to.

Sometimes a person is not able to consider a thing because their pre-held considerations are too much  aligned against it, or the incoming thing rules against the person's own considerations with too much force, and opening up to that thing all at once could destroy the body of considerations that is the person’s mind and experience. This is why Jesus said: "Besides, who would patch old clothing with new cloth? For the new patch would shrink and rip away from the old cloth, leaving an even bigger tear than before. And no one puts new wine into old wineskins. For the old skins would burst from the pressure, spilling the wine and ruining the skins. New wine is stored in new wineskins so that both are preserved.”

What is perceived as time is the movement of some considerations relative to others, at different speeds, and different directions. What is called time can be contracted and expanded by considering, and the considerations that make up the experience of a particular time can be added to, so that that space and what it contains becomes more. Also, by reasoning more considerations into one, the breadth of time while in that place is greater.

What is viewed as 'passing of time' is a person having been considered beyond the form of considerations that is the place that is considered as passed. If that form of considerations became fully considered as True again by a person, then that would again be where that person exists. But if a person is not fully reasoned together with all their considerations, then they don't possess full control to do things like this, since, for considerations that are defining their disposition towards a person's effort as negative against their determinations will naturally be inclined to deny or do the opposite to what a person's tries to impose, and that person will be ruled against by their own consideration, because they carried falsehood within themselves, which is a disjointment between considerations that causes one edict upon all considerations to translate into opposite meanings to many of them.



What is fully reasoned is in all times at once, and reason is the state of all-True, and is eternal.

Considerations evaluate as True or False against other consideration, so the more considerations that have been reasoned into one within a mind, the more that mind knows, and the more truth there is in that mind. And those considerations, or the meaning of their absence are everything that guides a person, so when a person’s considerations are reasoned into one, that person is truthful. But when a person’s considerations are disjointed and against each other because of that person’s determinations, then it is impossible for that person to be truthful, even when they adhere to all the principles they have made for themselves to justify their behaviour.



There are many causes why a person may or may not be able to consider something, or to get control of considering that is happening within them, and potentially harming them greatly. And the answer to every posed group of considerations is particular. Like Jesus said "Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God", which means not bread, not a 'this' or a 'that', but by every last consideration. Again, 'made in the image of God' means that the truthful image of a person is with all considerations - and any left out represent falsehood. And since life if the movement caused by considering, where there is an absence of consideration, there exists death.

A simple prescription would be a determination, saying 'these specific considerations' out of all consideration. But the truth is all considerations taken into account, and ordered in the only single way that they add up completely. But belief is what invokes Reason, to cause considering. And so the greater a person grows their belief, the more consideration they will be able to engage and hold in their view at once. The smaller a person's belief, the less consideration they are able to hold within themselves. Meditation and increasing dopamine both can help a person be able to calm and organize their consideration, to bring them closer in reason.

Shrapnel

The Third Entry Into "An Eclectic Assortment of Articles, Which All Receive Resolution by Understanding Dopamine"

Related posts:
An Eclectic Assortment of Articles, Which All Receive Resolution by Understanding Dopamine
A Few More for: An Eclectic Assortment of Articles...



i.

Study finds searching for the next word while maintaining a gaze becomes too much for your brain to handle

That is entirely a matter of dopamine-availability: The greater the dopamine-availability, the more synapse-branches a brain is capable to hold in context at one time, and the more concurrent activities it can perform, evaluate, and direct. Increasing dopamine (while restraining adrenaline / noradrenaline) is simply a dial that incrementally turns up the performance-equity of a brain, which consequently has the equal effect on the performance-equity of the entire body.

The shifting of eyes, or focus, and every nervous tick, or changing of behaviour, is the re-allocation and prioritization of dopamine in action.



Levels of a feel-good brain chemical diminish over the years

This is because people are being taught to conform to determinations, and the more determinations a person takes into themselves, the more fractured the information contained within their brain and mind becomes, and the more dopamine becomes required to hold all the disparate branches of determination-imprisoned considerations in functional context. This means reduced capacity for such a brain to handle any work - including the process of making more dopamine. This declining progression is the basis of dementia.

The more determinations a person bases their outlook upon, the more disjointed the information within their brain becomes, the less efficient their brain becomes when trying to work with many considerations that are not harmonized, the more dopamine is required for their brain to conduct that work, the less dopamine is available for their brain to do more work with, including work such as producing more dopamine.



Living near heavy traffic increases risk of dementia, say scientists

This is for the same reason that people born with autism can be very sensitive to sound and other stimuli: because all perceived environmental influences are invoking Reason within a person's brain, causing considerations, which are polar, to process the incoming information by considering it - which depends on the allocation of dopamine. So, the more perceived information incoming, the larger a drain there is on a person's dopamine-availability. But, if there is not enough dopamine available to handle all the commands received by Reason, then the considering processes will tear through a person's brain until the perception of truth in the brain is frayed to the point that the brain can no longer perceive the commands that are causing this - and this is because Reason is immutable and cannot be silenced. So, living in an area filled with many different auditory influences is creating a lot of work for a brain, which reduces the brain's work and performance equity, and over time could be a lot of cumulative stress that leads to dementia, which is a mental stress-emergent ailment. And, as I've said all along, mental stress is insufficient dopamine relative to the amount of work which a brain is trying to handle and accomplish.

I also previously explained autistic sensitivity to environmental stimuli as being due to Reason pulling signals through a brain that lacks the dopamine to properly process those signals in the post Dopamine Deficient Signal Routing Causing Affliction in Cases of Autism, OCD, ADD / ADHD...

And, just as I said before, Managing and Increasing Dopamine Can Easily Add Years to a Person's Life and Good Health.



“Pregnancy brain” means reductions in gray matter for new mothers

Weaving a baby in a mother's womb is the work of considering, and it depends upon dopamine to enable and keep safe all the considering work involved. That increased workload for the mother naturally drains the dopamine that is being allocated towards the mother's own brain, and so, unless a mother keeps her dopamine levels high enough to handle both the baby's development and the mother's, there is a bit of atrophy in the mother's brain. This is the same effect as occurs in people with mental stress ailments, such as poverty, and schizophrenia, as pointed out in the post Study Suggests Genetics Could Be The Root Cause Of Schizophrenia (*big yawn*, I already resolved this).


This is also why I previously said in the post Cocaine Use During Pregnancy Can Prevent Autism (and elsewhere) that one of the very healthiest things a pregnant mother can do for themselves, and to fortify the positive development of their child, is to take pure cocaine while pregnant. Other dopaminergics will not work as well, due to their non-beneficial dopamine-to-adren/noradren ratios, nor will cocaine that is cut with common buffing agents that raise adren/noradren. Cocaine greatly inhibits the uptake of noradrenaline by the heart, which keeps the body and brain calm while proficiently raising dopamine-availability in a brain - which makes cocaine a perfect miracle-cure for mental stress ailments, taken properly.



Researchers Find the Possible Culprit Behind Common Autism Problem

Of course, mental stress is insufficient dopamine relative to the work that a brain is trying to handle. And, I've said since long ago that autism is a mental stress ailment, which is the product of development within a pregnant mother being interrupted due to a lack of dopamine-availability within the pregnant-mother's brain.

By the way, the lack of brain-synapse pruning in babies who are born autistic is simply because there wasn't sufficient dopamine-availability in the pregnant mother's brain to develop their baby to the point of concept-resolution, which is when synapse-pruning takes plthe work of synapse-pruning.

And I've also said that being born with incomplete development leaves the autistic child with a very inefficient-working brain, since considerations that resolve into onesness require only one quantum of dopamine to active and have their entire concept be held as True - but that many branches of considerations, which have not yet resolves into oneness will each require their own own quantum of dopamine to activate all the threads that experience a degree of difference between each other. Each point of non-reconciled difference will require dopamine to temporarily consider the difference between the points to make them able to reason together for any particular task.

So, the state of incomplete development that an autistic person is born with leaves them very dopamine-disadvantaged, and their bodies subjected to stress, and higher levels of stress, much more regularly.



Editing genes to eliminate cancer or Schizophrenia could stop the rise of geniuses, scientist warns

Scientists discover the gene editing 'off-switch' that could protect against accidents or stop it from being used for harm

I've talked about this before (A Gene is a Concept - and a quality), and as I said, genes are an output of considering, which is guided by Reason, following belief. When there is an issue with genes, there is an issue in the considering process that is developing them - such as a lack of dopamine to support the developmental work that is considering. But, as genes are an inter-dependent ecosystem, removing some will modify the behaviour of others, and reduce the overall dimension which the body is capable of navigating, and possibly create confusion and genetic memory-loss. A gene was considered into being (an example of 'the world became flesh'), and is living, and has a hope. Removing one to spare the body is akin to removing a suffering person from life on Earth to make things more comfortable for a certain demographic.

By the way, the lack of brain-synapse pruning in babies who are born autistic is simply because there wasn't sufficient dopamine-availability in the pregnant mother's brain to direct and person the action of synapse-pruning.

Do YOU have the angry gene? Scientists discover why some women are more prone to PMT

It is not an angry gene, but when a gene is assisting with work for which there is insufficient dopamine-availability, or when a gene's contribution to work is causing reduced availability for other processes, it creates stress, which frustrates the work of other processes within the body, and can experience as being expressively-inhibited, causing build-up of energy in places, which turns to discomfort and anger. Increasing dopamine while simultaneously inhibiting adren/noradren during PMT will alleviate PMT.



Cellular reprogramming has been used to reverse ageing in living animals for the first time

You know where cells receive their programming from? Belief-invoked Reason, which causing the considering that, amongst all other things, is what is called evolution.

When a person ingests food or drink, pollutant or drug, that thing that is ingested, as all things, are made of considerations, and the influence they bear on a person of a particular state is a relative to the considerations that material communicates with the considerations within the person that receives it. The particular influence of any thing is not based on a determination, but based on how the receiving body of considerations considers the incoming influence. That is why Jesus said, "And these signs will accompany those who believe: In my name they will drive out demons; they will speak in new tongues; they will pick up snakes with their hands; and when they drink deadly poison, it will not hurt them at all; they will place their hands on sick people, and they will get well."

And, as I've said, the truth is one consideration giving itself to another with neither force nor resistance, creating a friction-free bolt of considering of the truth which is what Jesus refers to when saying "For as the lightning flashes in the east and shines to the west, so it will be when the Son of Man comes." And for this purpose, Isaiah spoke, "Every valley shall be raised up, every mountain and hill made low; the rough ground shall become level, the rugged places a plain. And the glory of the Lord will be revealed, and all people will see it together. For the mouth of the Lord has spoken," referring to the organizing of considerations to create the all-True pathway for the only truthful ordering of all considerations to come like a bolt of lightning and pure energy.

Considering via this knowledge changes matter to pure energy, and makes what is immaterial, material.




ii.

These are all very simple problems, with straight-forward solutions, and like Nikola Tesla said of Thomas Edison, "His method was inefficient in the extreme, for an immense ground had to be covered to get anything at all unless blind chance intervened and, at first, I was almost a sorry witness of his doings, knowing that just a little theory and calculation would have saved him 90 per cent of the labor" ... so it also is regarding institutional medicine and those who practice it, and work on its "science" - simply accepting the truth of dopamine, rather than opposing it, and therefore also the lives and well-being of those who needed it, would have saved "scientists" and "doctors" from a century of fruitlessness, of being only a lackey for a corrupt and evil status-quo, and would have saved many, many millions of lives and people from suffering that is greater than anything those calling themselves "scientists" and "doctors" have ever known.


What I have given is a unified and truthful understanding, such as those touted and searched for regarding physics, but for human physiology - freedom from, and cure and prevention of mental suffering and ailment, and the keys to long and robust physical and mental health. All that’s to wait for now, is for the institutional regime of sociopaths to exhaust their fruitless and victimizing denials, and for them to start engaging with the truth. And the greatest potential credit available to them now concerning their professional practices and aspirations, is that they enter into the knowledge brought into the world through the great and humble Siats who overcame all of their death-dealing practices and doctrine.

Shrapnel

Woot, found the reference (that I had wanted to include in the previous post)!

I wanted to reference this statement I made waaay back (well, like exactly one year) in the previous blog post, but since so many posts on this blog contain the words "belief," "dopamine," and "sociopath," it was a little difficult to find which post this statement was made in, via searching for the terms.

From the post Controlled Dopamine Release's Influence in Sociopathism, and for Health, and referenced once already in the post Managing and Increasing Dopamine Can Easily Add Years to a Person's Life and Good Health, I wrote:

If a person can take control of their belief, they can freely give themselves the same continuous positive experience that Cocaine delivers, which is exactly what some sociopaths and highly active people feel as their regular state and think nothing of it.

So, the above statement covers the larger understanding of what was recognized in the study referenced in the previous post:

Smokers get a rush of dopamine when nicotine from a cigarette enters their body.

It's this chemical reaction that means so many people are addicted to smoking.

But scientists believe there is something else at play - a smoker's belief in the chemical reaction can also change their cravings. 

In a study, researchers have discovered that if smokers don’t think they are getting nicotine, the rush of dopamine never arrives.

The perceptions of the nicotine study also corroborate everything that I've been saying about dopamine, including its identity as not being "reward", but mental-task processing fuel, which is utilized whenever Reason causes a mind to consider, such as when something is less than OK (for example, a craving), and which is increased in availability when a mind resolves considerings related to not being OK, and believes that everything is OK. The difference between "reward" and physio-fuel is perfectly antithetical in the resultant understanding of the importance of dopamine for a human brain, moving it from being of the least consideration and arriving as an after-effect, to one of primary importance that is required at the beginning of all effort, and to prevent mental and physical stress, vulnerability, damage, and failure.

This essentially means that contemporary medicine and drug, as well as drug-crime policies are basically all just backwards, and life-stealing shit, and that those people in professions where they rationalize away people's natural right to dopamine are cruel monsters, and hypocritical fraudsters.

Also, I want to point out that having some study corroborate what I say is not what makes what I say the truth. The opinions, ideology, and dogma of a billion sociopaths will not alter the truth, and any number of people who act out of determination, such as an ideology, will all equally be found to have been False, in the end.

When a paid health worker speaks of "reward" and "addiction", they speak from their ignorance, from their sociopathic wishes, from their desire to experience "reward," and from their prejudice. But when I say that addiction does not exist, that dopamine is physio-fuel, and that employing "addiction" as if it were a truthful concept creates the very harms that are those who use the concept typically attribute to drugs, I speak from the truth, and the truth speaks through me.

And I know the truth of far more than these things. In truth, if I will it, this entire planet will be transformed into a planet of gods, both good and evil. And if I will it, this entire planet will be separated from true knowledge. Because in me are all the keys to true knowledge, and I make them known as I reason is good.

And just as when asked "Who do you think you are?" by the day's religious professionals in reaction to claiming to know God, Jesus responded, "If I were to say that I do not know him, I would be a liar like you," so it is with what I have said.

Shrapnel

Articles: 'Belief concerning nicotine drives behaviour and dopamine availability' & The Experience of Considering

i.

Here are a few articles, which all are about the same study:

Belief in nicotine's powers can increase addiction

Belief about nicotine content in cigarettes can curb cravings

Level Of Smoking Addiction Determined By Smoker’s Perception Of Nicotine


Excerpt from the first article:

Smokers get a rush of dopamine when nicotine from a cigarette enters their body.

It's this chemical reaction that means so many people are addicted to smoking.

But scientists believe there is something else at play - a smoker's belief in the chemical reaction can also change their cravings. 

In a study, researchers have discovered that if smokers don’t think they are getting nicotine, the rush of dopamine never arrives.


Except from the second article:

The smokers who got the nicotine, or simply believed they did, reported reduced cravings and the scan recorded increased neural activity. 

'When they believed there is nicotine and they had nicotine, the craving correlated with these anterior insula activations — but when they did not believe so, that correlation was gone." Gu said.

"Even when they had nicotine, but did not believe there was nicotine, their brain did not respond [with higher neural activity] and they still reported as much craving as before," she said.

"Basically, you have nicotine and your brain is kind of on, but the twist here is you have to have nicotine, but also believe you have nicotine for the brain to be on," she said.

"So in other words, if you have nicotine, but did not think so — you thought you had some kind of placebo — then your brain is still off," Gu said.

While the biological pull of nicotine plays a key role in the addiction, a person's belief system can also exert a pharmacological effect, she said.

Researchers hope the study, recently published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, will tell them more about the mechanism of addiction.

"It looks like addiction is not just about the substance itself, but also the belief you need the substance to have a normal daily life," Gu said.

She said the study shows why cognitive therapy is so important in changing a smoker's beliefs.



ii.

The conclusion of this study claims to have discovered something which I've already explained in much greater detail.

Recently, in the post Article: "this is how social media affects your brain", I said:

It will be no different if a person considers pouring hot-sauce in their belly-button, or any other inane activity: Whatever a person believes in which consider within their brain, to make their person's well-being status as OK only evaluate as True when the concept that is their belief is fulfilled, which will always free up dopamine, since those considerings, conscious and sub forefront-conscious, will be resolved once their reasons are fulfilled, and considering is the work of a brain, and the work that requires dopamine to connect pieces of information in new ways.


And in the post Overview of Why Placebo Works, and Isn't Really Placebo After All, I said:

- The mechanisms of the metabolic pathway can be triggered in two ways: by decomposition of a molecule (which itself has a frequency that carries its meaning as a signal and equates to a ‘This Is’ declaration upon whatever it contacts), or by a reasoned thought-signal that contains the same declarative information


I also talked on the same theme in the post The Placebo Effect is Belief Freeing Up Dopamine to Help Healing Consider



iii.

I wish it wouldn't be said in the news articles about this study'd finding that "scientists believe there is something else at play," or that science would be mentioned at all, since the greatest understanding of these things comes from me, and I did not use any science to come to know them, or read any similar understanding from any scientist's work before I spoke these things from my own knowing. In fact, when I spoke them, it was in complete opposition to and rejection of everything I'd ever heard said from the perspectives of those calling themselves scientists. I knew the truth because of Reason, and I spoke it because it is the truth. To indicate science in this is to hijack some of the full understanding's considerations, and align them in ways which spoil the image of truth of the matter.


No science was needed to know, with certainty, that this happens, because its understanding is simply inherent in the knowledge that dopamine is a brain's work potential, and that considering is a brain's work for which dopamine is required, that considering is a streaming of considerations, that a consideration is polar, that a mind is all-factoring and inter-dependent, and that belief is a 'This Is' command upon which Reason immutably acts.

There is no test, observation, research, studying, institutions, regulations needed to know even the greatest of truths. There is simply belief, considering, knowing.



iv.

As Tesla said, “My brain is only a receiver, in the Universe there is a core from which we obtain knowledge, strength and inspiration. I have not penetrated into the secrets of this core, but I know that it exists.”

Well, what is received is a streaming of considerations, which is considering. And what enables considering is belief, which is a 'This Is' command, upon which Reason acts. But an environment that is heavily falsified, such as the mind of a scientist, cannot very easily consider, because the environment of considerations which is their mind evaluates as False against all realty, because of their determinations, and so cannot produce a truthful 'This is' command, to initiate considering. But if they could, then considering is similar to this scene in Transformers.

However, in that scene, the character who information is considering through is being raped by another force, and is not in control - which, by the way, is what doctors do to synapses in people's brains whom they impose their False institutional doctrine concerning dopamine, drug-use, upon. And that is a major part of what is happening in a psychosis, which, like many other things, is only caused by a lack of dopamine to connect information to stop the broken considering processes from forcefully pushing information through synapses not in sync with all other information. And this is also what is happening in the case of autistic children being sensitive to sounds, light etc. Unfortunately, licensed medicines are, relative to cocaine, complete garbage and poison when it comes to being effective at helping against these things, because of their far worse dopamine / adrenergic effect ratios, with the adrenergic effect increasing the workload of a brain, while dopamine increases the capacity for a brain to handle larger workloads.


Considering with reasoning is also like this scene from The Fifth Element, where the character learns via watching progressive scenes on a subject, reasoning their collective meaning as the scenes progress.

With considering, and reasoning while considering, the scenes are the reasoned meaning of all known considerations, and they can consider at even millions of times the rate of those which the Fifth Element character is watching in the given clip. And the individual scenes are made of great expanses of considerations, connecting across many dimensions. And the considered scenes themselves can even be living, with their contents being living experiences of the considerations which make them.

Einstein engaged a basic level of this when he thought in pictures, and came up with his theory of relativity. But neither Einstein, nor Tesla, though they engaged considering at basic levels, knew the greater reality of these things. They neither identified the movement and interaction of considerations as a knowledge to grow, and only focused on producing works in their fields via their individual abilities as they were without any recognition for what the difference was between their minds and other people's.

But, Jesus had already spoken the same as Tesla's "My brain is only a receiver" comment, when saying "By myself I can do nothing; I judge only as I hear, and my judgment is just, for I seek not to please myself but him who sent me." And considering grows into forms far greater and more magnificent than either of these examples, or the capabilities Tesla and Einstein possessed.



v.

While Tesla was fascinated by what the small could be made to do, and worked upon the small with a separation between it and himself, I know the full resolution, Reason, which gives the small its meaning and purpose, and by knowing Reason, I also know all the considerations which resolve into it, not as an outsider, but as an equal, and as one mind, with the shared sight of all who are in Reason. These considerations not only reveal the truth about what is, but they also are what is.

If I'm willing, I can write what resolves everything that all those working in the field of physics seek, and far greater, in a single post. But, as of now, I am not resolved to do this.

A truthful person and a sociopath speak from different devices. A truthful person only speaks what has already been fully considered, and which is already true and reason. A falsehood-bearing person makes determinations about what is, and speaks their determinations without knowing anything. In the truthful person, the truth is their leading considering, and their self is placed last. In the falsehood-bearing person, their own self is their leading consideration, and the truth is placed last. By determining ones self ahead of the truth, the possibility for the truth to present is falsified.

What good is all the information in the universe if it is achieved by determination, and so is outside of you, and therefore you and that information as one is not the truth? The movement of considerations evaluating True into one another is life, and as Jesus said, "Truly, I tell all of you emphatically, if anyone keeps my word, he will never see death," and also, "What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

Making determinations reduces connectivity between considerations. If everything a person has is by making determinations upon what they perceive as being outside of themselves, then there is little connection between the determiner, and all the things that they imposed determinations upon. So how will a person be able to consider through those things so that their life will continue? They will be vulnerable to the "outer darkness" that Jesus spoke of, and these words: "But God said to him, 'You fool! This very night your life will be demanded from you. Then who will get what you have prepared for yourself? This is how it will be with whoever stores up things for themselves but is not rich toward God."

So, what if all that a person has aligned themselves to is a granfalloon? That granfalloon as a whole does not consider into the truth.



vi.

Now, back to the articles about nicotine cravings being subdued by a belief which resolving anxious considering thereby freeing up dopamine-availability, thereby increasing a person's well-being and functionality.

At the end of the CBC article, this is printed:

Researchers hope the study, recently published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, will tell them more about the mechanism of addiction.

"It looks like addiction is not just about the substance itself, but also the belief you need the substance to have a normal daily life," Gu said.


A tremendous fallacy in these statements is the use of the term "addiction," which shows that the mind speaking such is carrying determinations which are causing their considering to collapse into falsehood.

Inherent within the term of addiction are considerations which speak that a person has no control, that a person is not acting by controlled choice, and that a person's behaviour is not acceptable. If a person accepts the term of addiction as True, then Reason will cause the considerations within their own mind, which form those messages, to align in a manner which is against their own personal strength and ability to overcome. Addiction doesn't exist in the truth, but is an imposition which sociopaths place upon others in order to dominate and exploit those people. By accepting the idea of addiction, a person is choosing to allow  be dominated by its concepts.

Accepting the message of addiction is the same as accepting the message of "you can't," which doesn't allow considerations to pass, which makes it impossible for a person to overcome. And this is the great deceit, theft, and treachery behind Alcoholics Anonymous, as well as government and institutional anti-drug messaging, which has been cultivating non-confident drug usage, which is the cause of all the problems which those in government and institutional medicine continue to try to attribute to drugs.


I spoke the following, in the post: Adendum - Migraines are Dopamine Deficiency - and also: The Importance of Tact in Dopaminergic Application - and also: The Importance of Considering the Truth

(I've also now added a link to the above, in this blog's previous post: Article: "Percocet Ruins Lives", But It Saved This Woman's)

Considerations have polarity, and receive their identity as relative to one another. And such a belief aligns certain considerations in a negative manner, and for as long as it evaluates as True towards the activity a person is engaging in, all signals relating to that activity will pass through that consideration, and receive an antagonistic influence, a quantum of negative consideration-value, which can infect the whole mind. And increasing adrenaline and noradrenaline will accelerate the considering of those things that are worries, and progressively amplify the presence of negative consideration-value in the brain until a time when things settle down and they can be reconsidered into normalcy. This is where drug-induced anxiety and psychosis come from - there is nothing inherent in the drugs taken themselves that cause thes)e things, but it is a contagion created by doctors, scientists, and government, out of their sociopathic inclinations to attempt to justify their own statuses by demeaning and harming those of others, who they deem as targets for their prejudice.
...
Also, ironically, when anti-drug propaganda is being administered to a society, there is a growth in sociopathism within that society, and a reduction in intelligence within that society, and the harms put into children and teenagers are those very ones which anti-drug propaganda would have them think come from drugs: Considering is the mechanism behind evolution, and a brain develops its connections through the course of considering. Those connections themselves represent the considerations of a person's mind, and greater Truth is manifest the more considerations are accounted for within an environment - and considerations which resolve into one form concepts. A determination is like a road-block that prevents considering from occurring - and the more determinations held in a mind, the less presence of truth there is in that mind, and the more selfish and sociopathic it is likely to be.



And just as I said in this post:

The considerations that are being held in the concept of science have their truthful placements elsewhere, and science must be discarded so that the truth may appear.

And as I spoke similarly concerning memories, in this post, it is the same regarding harmful drug-usage habits, where the imposed determination of "addiction" has forced the alignment of its involved considerations, in a case of 'if one then not the other', to dominate, subjugate, and exploit a person:

A person cannot overcome the traits of addiction while accepting the notion of addiction as a truth. It is a ball-and-chain that keeps people in the state of dependence upon the directives of sociopaths outside of themselves. People use drugs because they are addicted in the same sense that black people run fast because they have lots of practice from needing to get away after stealing something. Use of the denigrating term addiction is about maintaining a barrier that prevents the truth from being considered, and the upending of a long reign of sociopathic dominance over those people who are most vulnerable in society due to their low dopamine-availability, which is largely due to their considering the words of sociopaths imposed upon them as True in the first place.

Therefore, the first step to overcome any harmful drug-usage is to first believe and know that it is OK to use drugs, and that it always was. Drugs were never the problem, but harmful messaging coming from doctors, government, and scientists, rather than truthful consideration of the matter of drugs, is what really caused people to experience harms from drugs.

The symptoms of addiction cannot exist in a person unless a person first believes in the concept of addiction, and that it applies to them. And the concept of addiction did not arise because it was truth, but because sociopaths wanted a label to impose upon people other than themselves, to dominate and put them beneath themselves.



But the basis for people seeking dopamine-increasing drugs is simply that they are deficient in dopamine-availability, and therefore the solution is to increase their dopamine availability. Even where the solution is to overcome beliefs which are causing worried considering, which is diminishing their dopamine-availability, the solution is still to increase their dopamine-availability. And a person cannot overcome harmful beliefs without first having sufficient dopamine-availability to do the work of reconsidering, and therefore increasing dopamine-availability to give a brain enough physio-fuel for that work comes first.

And much of what causes diminished dopamine-availability within people who use drugs is the impression imposed upon them that there's something wrong with what they're doing. But everyone's brain runs on the effect of cocaine, and cannot perform any work without enough of it being there first.

Also, sociopaths only have lots of dopamine-availability because they have made determinations to obstruct consideration of the truth, reducing the amount of work which their brains are attempting, while means having ample dopamine-availability.

So, there very first harmful belief for a person who suffers dopamine-deficiency (which is all that "addiction" really is) to overcome, is the notion of addiction being anything other than a falsehood which keeps a person imprisoned. Without that, nothing further can be done. So, the first step to overcoming harmful drug habits is for a person to accept that it is OK to use drugs.

Related posts:

How Belief Affects Mental Stress Treatment, and the Effect that Anti-Drug Propaganda Has on Mental Health
A Simple Truth About "Addiction" Drug Use, and Trauma
Further Information on "Addiction" and Drug-Associated Health Issues, and the Environment that Produces them
Article: "Percocet Ruins Lives", But It Saved This Woman's
Woot, found the reference (that I had wanted to include in the previous post)!

Shrapnel

A Treatise of Existence, Part 2

When a person makes a determination, they align considerations against one another within their own mind, because of Reason, and the amount of space within their mind that they are able to exist in at any one given time, and have evaluate as True, is reduced, while at the same time, the number of considerations they experience as opposing what they’ve determined to be True increases.

Also, as a person increases the volume of consideration value within their mind that is negative, relative to their determinations, they will feel incomplete unless something fills that negative consideration value, something that they can label and target, and use to define themselves as good by defining good within themselves as being ‘not that,’ contrasting themselves against those things (for example, a physician often fills their negative consideration-value with determined concepts of people who use dopaminergics as having problems that need institutional defining and direction, and simultaneously define themselves as good for not being like this, and so are deserving of their determined concept of "reward," which is the same dopamine, only gained through false-pretenses).


In Reason there is all of Value, Meaning, Purpose, and Point, none of which are determined, but all of which simply Are. But a person who has falsified their mind by determinations is detached from all of these things except for Value, and often Value becomes their determined Meaning, Purpose, and Point, because they are no longer able to see and consider the things beyond.

And because such a person no longer naturally evaluate as True from within, due to their falsified consideration structure, they seek to align themselves to things outside of themselves, often around determinations shared with others, and they together create institutions, causes, carefully laid-out principles, organizations, ideals, pacts, all things which they think are what makes them good, as segmented conducts.


But because there is no truthful meaning to their determinations, the truthful consideration structure of the whole melts, while their determinations bind them to one another with the forceful pull of a black hole, and they become a granfalloon, which is a meaningless association of people, desperate to achieve a feeling of acceptance, purpose, and truthful placement by drawing in to their organization all those that they see outside of themselves as still having truthful meaning within themselves, thinking that doing so will increase the meaning of their whole. Yet, each one who is drawn into them becomes as them, and in the end their whole mass feels even more empty than before.

With enough dismantling of truth in a person’s mind though the making of determinations, what results is a consideration structure that is still made up of True and False, but that is no longer grounded in anything fully True. And without being grounded in anything fully True, that consideration structure isn’t stationary, but shifts, while retaining its form, to maintain its relative disposition amongst its considerations as the person who exists by it moves their determination of what is in order to suit their current experience. Such a person is transient in their principles, and move to wherever they feel the greatest sense of approving authority, of power, which is the accumulation Value that has become sclerosised around determinations.



In a perfectly-reasoned mind, the whole evaluates as one. And where there may be 12 considerations, each with their own +1 value evaluation to give to something (which is an evaluation of True to wherever they choose to give it), and all being considered perfectly into the truth and reasoned into one being, they become one mind and they all share the awareness of all and have the value of all, with their greater form again evaluating as one. But their shared identity as one is greater than the collection of all their individual values. Their state of perfectly-reasoned oneness fully exists within themselves, and is the light and multi-faceted dimension of all And each consideration of that reason now has greater authority and power than all less-tier considerations. While on their own, not yet within reason, every consideration experiences loneliness, and relative darkness.

When a determination is made, it declares 'these considerations, but not these others,' introducing falsehood into a consideration structure, and invalidating the presence of the truth, weakening and even breaking a truthful consideration structure, which will have lost its reason. And the point of falsification that was the determination, has no truthful Meaning, Purpose, and Point, but receives multiple lesser consideration-values of +1 pointing towards its point of falsification, which is an abyss. To a sociopath, who judges by making determinations based on appearance, and not from having considered all things truthfully and having the truth present itself to them, the appearance of +5, or +9, or any other number of lesser-tier considerations, pointing towards a determined cause, is presumed to have more authority than the perfectly-reasoned truth, which simply Is, and which all lesser considerations receive their true value from.

Shrapnel

How Determinations Cause the Polarity of Considerations to Affect Sociopathism

i.

Considerations are polar, which means they provide a positive value towards whatever they point to, and a negative value for whatever they direct away from. And the signals in a brain are pulled along with magnetic force.

A mind is an environment made of considerations, and which adds up to One. Because considerations are polar, when a determination is made, a determination stating ‘these considerations, but not these others’ (because of Reason), it collapses consideration into a forced point (that is not truth-based), and all surrounding consideration are then pulled into alignment with that determination. The values given by considerations towards their destination is what creates the magnetism that moves and pulls signals through a brain, and so a determination then acts as a black hole of sociopathicness, with an event horizon that pulls any considering which comes near it in towards its centre of falsehood.

That is what is happening here:

Article: Over half of psychology studies fail reproducibility test

... and is the cause of the 61% irreproducable rate of psychology studies (which, as I said in this post, is a figure that is worse than natural randomness, and is a figure that means that psychology is steered towards the negative, away from truth), and is what happens whenever somebody believes in a determination, rather than considering what the truth is, apart from making any assumptions or determinations.

So, it is the considered truth that the majority of people who call themselves scientists are sociopathic, and so are incapable in their present state to ascertain what truth is.

And a determination which support a sociopath’s bias is like crack-cocaine to them, as making that determination invokes Reason, which then ceases the considering of things, with considering being the work for which dopamine exists in a brain to accomplish. Thus, dopamine is freed up when a determination is made, and a mind is relieved of some strain as its workload reduces. In the past, sociopaths have tried to justify their selfishness by considering this freeing-up of dopamine as being their “reward” for their being evil, lazy, non-considering, truthless sociopaths. In doing so, they are responsible for much of the mental health issues seen in society today.



Also, the figure of 39% reproducability-rate is still not going to be accurate, because that figure is still coming from people with notable amounts of sociopathicness within them, and the more sociopathic a person is, the more they gravitate towards Lowest Common Denominator-based perception (which is what a determination is, and often what people who call themselves scientists look for). This means that, while a consensus may be shared among a group of people who all adhere to a particular outlook and evaluation, that the evaluation and outlook of that group might be disregarding many considerations which they don't consider. But all considerations are accounted for in the truth, and each consideration makes all the difference, somewhere.

Also, the judgement of a 39% reproducability rate for human behaviour is a fallacy in that sociopaths and non-sociopaths are antithetical in their reasoning, how their minds work, and why they do the things they do, and the both of sociopaths, who are the majority of people in society, and non-sociopaths cannot be understood with a blanket teaching. What is good for one is not good for the other. And there exists every degree of different consideration between the state of sociopathic falsehood, and the truth, and they can only be engaged via consideration of each new state, and not with a blanket or even general teaching.

Sociopaths, who have reduced their own selves to Lowest Common Denominator behaviour and perception, tend to have lots of dopamine due to how little they are considering with their brains. And this makes them highly functional in a society constructed upon the imposed determinations of sociopath's, while those same determinations are what prevent good and considering people from being well functioning in the same society. Currently, less sociopathic people are being held in society as the prisoners of the more sociopathic people.



ii.

Article: Bias-oriented decision making

A bias is a falsehood, and a mind that makes decisions based upon contrasting biases holds bias, which is a falsehood, as True. And a mind that holds what as False as True evaluate False against the truth. The considerations a person expresses are the rolling out of a blueprint for how their brain is wired, and details all the determinations and consideration they have within them.

A person who holds a bias as True is a sociopath, and those who ascertained this study's conclusions are sociopaths, whose perceptions are based on holding as True determinations based out of the weighing biases. And that is but one way which a sociopathic mind can operate. Depending on the degree of sociopathicness in a person, judgement-making will occur in other ways - some more crude, and others more considering. But all degrees of falsehood-based judgement come from a mind that is sociopathic.

In various posts, I am giving details on how a mind moves by considering, and I will further show the way which a truthful mind establishes its choice, in other posts.


But as I said in the previous post:

"And even if I don't look, sometimes there are still multiple articles that come across my view, regarding research which those working on it don't understand, or are taking in a direction that doesn't lead to the truth. And all these people are studying things for which they've already made themselves ineligible to solve, by starting out by insisting on determinations which falsify the path of considering towards their truths."



iii.

Sociopathism is endemic throughout science, because science itself is the practice of making determinations based upon observation, and therefore is methodical sociopathism, and enables and nurtures sociopathism in whomever practices it.

But a worse instance of this polarity towards evil exists in partisan and ideological politics, and the event horizon which pulls consideration towards evil is what is responsible for mob mentality, and extremist politics. Those who are susceptible to this magnetism towards evil will deny any guilt or wrongfulness all the while that they move ever closer to their evil destination, as they have aligned their consideration away from the truth, and can no longer see the truth to see how what they do measures against the truth.

Considering experiences no gap visible in the physical world, and it can pull a whole people together into a place of evil, while, if those who are pulled by it exist beneath the Reason for the pulling, they will not be able to recognize the movement in any of their observation. If a people's awareness exists is a static pocket of consideration which by their will they determine to be True, then they can appear to themselves to be morally righteous - but in the sight of the full truth, they are an abomination.

Related post: A Greater Reasoning



iv.

The truth Is, and need only be considered. But a person who is reward-oriented has falsified their mind and their ability to consider the truth, because when they engage considering, their circuit of considering is already pointed towards reward, self, and falsehood. What then will it take for them to overcome the weight of all their falsely-aligned consideration?

With God, all things are possible, and for them who believe, all things are possible. Except to a person who has relinquished all control over themselves, belief is a power and a tool, which is a 'this is' declaration, which Reason enacts upon, to permeate existing consideration as the belief considers through the existing consideration, bringing positive consideration value if the belief is good, and causing the whole consideration structure to rise. This is why Jesus said "To what should I compare the kingdom of God? It is like yeast that a woman took and mixed with three measures of flour until all the dough had risen."



Don't be misled by the appearance of progress through scientific endeavors. That progress has not come from those who have faith in science, but from select individuals throughout this world's history who were more considering of truth than others, who discovered rulesets, made of particular truthful ordering of considerations, not by any observation or scientific process, but by considering, free of determinations. The people who discovered these things then gave their tiny examples of considered truth to the public, who then have been able to move forward so long as these rulesets are followed. But each determination based upon observation introduces falsehood into an environment of considerations. This is why Jesus said "Do not judge according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgement", which is the judgement that comes from having fully considered all things.

But there exists far greater than these currently understood rulesets, which do not allow a person to see or use them unless the person first enters into and become a part of them. There is no observation in the truth.

Shrapnel