Thursday 19 March 2015

second page - My Ongoing Open Letter to LEAP (Law Enforcement Against Prohibition)

first page - My Ongoing Open Letter to LEAP (Law Enforcement Against Prohibition)

Not all people have the same availability of released dopamine in their brains, and the release of dopamine is highly conditional to a person's perceived well-being and position in life. When people talk about reward, as a mechanism of the brain, and just as much as when people talk about something being rewarding to them personally, they're noting the release of dopamine in the brain. When somebody makes a judgement that they accomplished something, or that things are good for them, their brain worries about less, and eases up on its dopamine control, and some more dopamine becomes available, which in turn makes the person feel much more at ease, and much better able to analyse, concentrate, and appreciate all things - because more dopamine means easier flow of information throughout the brain, and relaxation for that whole person. People in struggling places in life generally will have very low amounts of dopamine available to them - so their environmental condition is exacerbated by them having even less means than other people to do anything about it. No matter how clear and obvious a solution is, if there isn't enough available dopamine to process the extra information that recognizing and accomplishing a solution takes, the solution will be as if entirely invisible to the person, or impossible to wrap their head around, or accomplish soundly.

A person can only accomplish what their on-hand dopamine availability will allow them to,  and how difficult a thing is to accomplish will highly depend on a person's dopamine availability. The list on the left in this link are some of those in society with the largest amounts of on-hand released-dopamine:

In perfect honesty, the average person would have to take a notable dose of cocaine in order to become similarly dopamine-equipped as a police-person, who arrests people under the influence of, and in the possession of cocaine. The dopamine released by cocaine is the full effect of cocaine, and there is no difference between the dopamine released by cocaine, and the dopamine that a brain has naturally - it is one and the same, and cocaine, and other dopaminergics, only spur a relaxation on its regulation, allowing for more of it to release. A police-person often is experiencing higher dopamine-availability than a person whom they might be confronting for holding a dopamine-releasing substance - but to the police-person, that relatively-elevated level of dopamine is the norm, while a person they confront for having a dopamine-releasing substance is used to a far lower level of available dopamine. In short, police arrest others for what they are more guilty of, themselves. Another way to put it, is that possession and use of dopamine-releasing substances cannot be a moral crime, because every human being runs on, and is wholly dependent upon having the availability of dopamine in the brain, and every positive experience in a person's life was only possible because their brain had the dopamine-availability to be capable to process and receive it.

Shrapnel Reason

first page - My Ongoing Open Letter to LEAP (Law Enforcement Against Prohibition)

Hello, I would like to make known to LEAP an element of prohibition that is never touched upon, or acknowledged publicly. The information I am giving pertains to the fields I study and work in.

Prohibition deals most harshly with substances like cocaine, and methamphetamine - substances for which there is a huge market, involving organized crime, with much destruction and much death. These particular substances - cocaine and methamphetamine derive their sought effect from the release of dopamine which these substances induce in a user's brain. Dopamine is the neurotransmitter responsible for delivering information across the brain's synapses, and to understand dopamine's influence and importance in the brain, a person can think of it as though dopamine's presence in a brain were represented by a control knob that can be slid up and down - when the control knob is slid up, the transmittal of information across the brain's synapses improves, so: control of thought increases, memory improves, attention to detail increases, precision of thought gains accuracy, capacity to handle larger concepts and volumes of data is improved, and brain-and-body-health is generally improved overall. When the control knob is slid down, the reverse of all these things happens: the transmittal of information across the brain's synapses suffers, and all kinds of mental stress-based ailments can emerge, as well as many physical pains and difficulties in concentrating, paying attention, and working on tasks in general. The ability to remember fades, and everything become much harder for a person.

This probably leaves a reader, particularly one in policing, wondering about some cases of drug users who don't look better for their drug use - increasing dopamine with a drug like methamphetamine (though far less so with cocaine) has a reciprocal effect of releasing adrenaline, and a reciprocal adrenaline release can agitate many stress-based situations in a person, despite the dopamine increase simultaneously giving the brain better capability to handle those stresses - a bit like a counter-acting effect. Keep in mind that those stress thought-patterns in the person only emerged from there being a lack of dopamine in a person (relative to the amount of work their mind has been trying to do) in the first place. This adrenaline release leading to possible anxieties in a user is far less experienced by cocaine users because cocaine, in addition to releasing more of the dopamine that's already in a person's brain, simultaneously inhibits the further release of adrenaline - so cocaine is sort of like an exact stress antidote.

Here are some research links regarding what I've said about dopamine's influence as being accurately understandable as a slide control knob for the brain's all-around functioning:


Sunday 15 March 2015

The Combining of Considerations Forms Dimensional Space

The joining of any two considerations creates new dimensional space – space in which energy / information can move and flow, and in which new possibility exists that does not exist apart from those considerations being joined. If they separate, then that dimensional space is gone unless they rejoin. If any further considerations are considered into the context created by those two, further paths for information to travel are added for each, and new directions that didn't exist beforehand suddenly do exist. Each consideration gains new accessible qualities for every further consideration that it recognizes and knows.

The gained ways that information can move are not just to and from, but also within, and more. Every different consideration produces a unique manner of movement for information, and how it applies to a consideration which it comes into knowing with is unique to the context between the two - and this is how Relativity is made.

Combining one consideration with another creates a new consideration, that of their relationship, and adds dimension, while also separating one consideration from another removes consideration, and diminishes dimension by which information can flow within each individual consideration, and reduces the overall capability of those disparate considerations. If separation is made between considerations there forms a chasm, a dimensional gulf between which information cannot travel across.

Every further consideration adds new dimension to all those previously held, and every individual person moves through as many dimensions as they, with their minds, knows the consideration to experience. Different people are existing in different volumes of dimensions, and a person can exist in any number of dimensions simultaneously.

As I said before:

"If there was full separation between any considerations (such as a person, a mind, a thought, a cell) and other consideration, the two wouldn't be observable within the same reality. The universe wouldn't experience the other, and the other wouldn't experience the universe. They would be two separate existences, not aware of each other and not able to experience each other - and so exerting no influence upon each other. They would pass right through each other without effect, and each would be to the other as if non-existent."

This means that whole beings that are made through the knowing of different considerations can live in shared location without experiencing one another's realm, or only experience the slight bit which they have in common - yet in Reason everything adds up, and so to each perception things would experience as normal, even though completely foreign realities were influencing one another.

If a person wants have the ability to see and be present in all, they can, by considering. A person sees and experiences all dimension which they have Mind to - but they won’t know the presence, feel offered avenues, or reap benefits from considerations they are without the knowing of.

Reason is above any amount of considerations, and Reason is not a consideration. What exists by consideration does not see what is in Reason, as Reason exists as result of all consideration, unified and in singularity, and anything less than all consideration doesn't have, through knowing of considerations, the sight to see Reason. This whole seen and unseen universe can be the movement of just one being, or of a few. Only by becoming perfectly Reasoned will a person receive into themselves all the considerations of Reason, and gain its sight. Time and space do not matter or exist in Reason, and are the False Concepts of fallen, broken, and lost considerations.

Related post: A Treatise of Existence


Friday 13 March 2015

The Integrity of Considering Till Resolution

Towards a premise whose resolution contains 100 considerations, there will be a distinct and different conclusion for every incremental quantity of considerations that are harmonized in pursuit of the resolution, but anything less than harmonizing all considerations will be a certain falsehood, and choosing it will close the considering in failed state – and influence a mind that willingly preferred the incomplete option, as that Will will be held within all considerations that were accepted as Answer, influencing the predilection for that person to accept incomplete answers in further trials.

The harmonization of 99 out of 100 considerations will produce a starkly different solution than the full harmonization of all considerations, which will produce a resolution that is perfection, and produce a unified signal with the value of 1, that means all its considerations. Anything that is not all-factoring will polarize the mind, and an incomplete solution will itself be polar against the truth (which is not polar), and in ways be completely antithetical to the authentic resolution. 99 of 100 considerations still holds the meaning and identity of ‘not the answer’.

A resolution to a considering contains all its considerations, and will produce a unified signal that is one, but means all its considerations equally. That signal will apply throughout the whole mind, shifting all things in a relative manner, and give new dimension to all previous understanding and consideration, and become a knowing within the mind that receives it - the only knowing that is indeed knowing. The state of not having received the signal of knowing is simultaneously the knowing that there remains further considering to be done.

A determination is made apart from complete substantiation, and so a determination ultimately is a falsehood wherever it's made. A determination is the power of personal choice made where it is ineligible - projected on anything beyond oneself. A determination made upon another is literal rape of that person's Will, equal to sexual rape, and the response and influence upon a mind is the same in both cases. The willingness of the person who passed the determination is also perfectly equal to the will of a sexual rapist, as that exerted Will was the same choice to disregard. Compartmentalizing that choice as good or bad dependent on its physical manifestation is sociopathic, and there is no truth to the basis of a thing being dependent upon it becoming observable.

Because how a person considers iterates upon the structure of the mind, and orders a person's considerations, a person who is with disorganization in their mind can find it very difficult to consider truthfully, and some people can't even tell what considering is, or how to open the door to it. Some people's considerations are disparate, and cannot find where to send their information onward to. Some people’s considerations are organized such that if they open up the door to considering, it will send their mind into a failing loop, or sharp descent - and some people's minds are so propped by determinations that breaking them will cause that mind to collapse into ruin. A lot of people simply don't have enough dopamine-availability to engage considering.

But belief pulls all considerations into a unified True, and every effort should be made to consider in truthful manner. Whatever comes before Reason is not remembered.


Saturday 7 March 2015

The Exact Mechanism of Sociopathism

A person's belief re-routes signals in the brain, and the brain's synapses will restructure according to how a person considers. When a person relies on making strong determinations, they are short-circuiting the travel of signals in the brain. When this goes on as a habit, the brain de-links some of its synaptic connections, and re-routes them. This can lead to dead spaces in the brain, and loss of mental articulation, empathy, detail-awareness...

The mechanism of sociopathism is the making, by act of will, truth-circumventing determinations.

To make a determination, a mind must have been presented with options, and when a determination was made, Reason’s principle enacted, separating some considerations from others, saying ‘if these, then not the others’. The mind then de-linked some associations between considerations, and that de-linking of considerations was paralleled in the brain by disconnecting some synaptic connections.

This can be done to an extent that eventually manifests activity-dead areas in the brain, but it can also be done regularly without leading to observable dead spaces in the brain.

Because dopamine is responsible for transmitting information across synapses, and because every considering requires a measurement of dopamine-availability to process, making a determination also causes some allocated dopamine to release. Some have found it personally accommodating to call this ‘Reward’ (for what, being a good dog?), but it actually is the crux of sociopathic brain-wiring. 'Reward' is interchangeable with Sociopathism.

Ironically, for the academic dogma that there is a reward circuit in the brain, or the concept of dopamine-as-reward to have arisen, there required sociopathic perceptions to project the abstract and choice of 'Reward' upon the subjects of their observations. People in professions that are based in making of lots of determinations, like doctor, or scientist, are particularly vulnerable to sociopathism.

And while recent professional opinion on the prevalence of sociopathism in society volunteered maybe less than 5% of people as qualifying, the likely reality is that 50%+ of people have notable presence of sociopathic circuit-wiring, with greater concentration of them being in determination-making professions.


Friday 6 March 2015

A Considering Versus A Willed-Determination

Considering takes all things into account and produces a unified resolution, substantiated in all ways and by all things. But a determination divides and separates one portion of considerations from the rest, saying these, but not the others; because this, then not the rest; because this one, therefore not the other. Because Truth is ultimately all considerations harmonized into one, a determination is a falsehood by nature.

Both considering and a determination produce an actionable meaning, but a determination is made ahead of substantiation of details, while considering is the connecting of details, and unless it's interrupted before completion with a willed-determination, considering only manifests a resolution after all details have harmonized together to produce a singular truth - apart from which there remains no further considerations to account for.

If a considering is interrupted with a willed-determination, that determination will be a falsehood. If a person considers for a while and feels that after enough has connected and that the conclusion is obvious, that assumption will implore a determination, and the determination will produce a falsehood. Anything less than True is False, and anything less than experiencing full Reason at the end of a considering is artificial, imposed, flawed, truthless.

Similarly, expression that comes directly from the Anterior Insula has completed substantiation before it exists to be expressed, and its expression is the resolution of all details having been taken into account. The resolution is product of a premise having filtered through all that person’s considerations, and the output resolution is then the most complete and accurate expression that that person’s mind is capable to produce, and the maximum knowing that person can have.

The resolution and truth realized by the non-determined completion of considering is a Reason, and also creates new considerations for the mind that receives it, and produces a new understanding in the mind, growing that mind overall. If this is continued, the growth of mind will be exponential, until the whole mind resolves and unifies into singularity, and becomes Reasoning - traversing wholly though Reasons, and not considerations.

Related: The Exact Mechanism of Sociopathism