How Determinations Cause the Polarity of Considerations to Affect Sociopathism

i.

Considerations are polar, which means they provide a positive value towards whatever they point to, and a negative value for whatever they direct away from. And the signals in a brain are pulled along with magnetic force.

A mind is an environment made of considerations, and which adds up to One. Because considerations are polar, when a determination is made, a determination stating ‘these considerations, but not these others’ (because of Reason), it collapses consideration into a forced point (that is not truth-based), and all surrounding consideration are then pulled into alignment with that determination. The values given by considerations towards their destination is what creates the magnetism that moves and pulls signals through a brain, and so a determination then acts as a black hole of sociopathicness, with an event horizon that pulls any considering which comes near it in towards its centre of falsehood.

That is what is happening here:

Article: Over half of psychology studies fail reproducibility test

... and is the cause of the 61% irreproducable rate of psychology studies (which, as I said in this post, is a figure that is worse than natural randomness, and is a figure that means that psychology is steered towards the negative, away from truth), and is what happens whenever somebody believes in a determination, rather than considering what the truth is, apart from making any assumptions or determinations.

So, it is the considered truth that the majority of people who call themselves scientists are sociopathic, and so are incapable in their present state to ascertain what truth is.

And a determination which support a sociopath’s bias is like crack-cocaine to them, as making that determination invokes Reason, which then ceases the considering of things, with considering being the work for which dopamine exists in a brain to accomplish. Thus, dopamine is freed up when a determination is made, and a mind is relieved of some strain as its workload reduces. In the past, sociopaths have tried to justify their selfishness by considering this freeing-up of dopamine as being their “reward” for their being evil, lazy, non-considering, truthless sociopaths. In doing so, they are responsible for much of the mental health issues seen in society today.



Also, the figure of 39% reproducability-rate is still not going to be accurate, because that figure is still coming from people with notable amounts of sociopathicness within them, and the more sociopathic a person is, the more they gravitate towards Lowest Common Denominator-based perception (which is what a determination is, and often what people who call themselves scientists look for). This means that, while a consensus may be shared among a group of people who all adhere to a particular outlook and evaluation, that the evaluation and outlook of that group might be disregarding many considerations which they don't consider. But all considerations are accounted for in the truth, and each consideration makes all the difference, somewhere.

Also, the judgement of a 39% reproducability rate for human behaviour is a fallacy in that sociopaths and non-sociopaths are antithetical in their reasoning, how their minds work, and why they do the things they do, and the both of sociopaths, who are the majority of people in society, and non-sociopaths cannot be understood with a blanket teaching. What is good for one is not good for the other. And there exists every degree of different consideration between the state of sociopathic falsehood, and the truth, and they can only be engaged via consideration of each new state, and not with a blanket or even general teaching.

Sociopaths, who have reduced their own selves to Lowest Common Denominator behaviour and perception, tend to have lots of dopamine due to how little they are considering with their brains. And this makes them highly functional in a society constructed upon the imposed determinations of sociopath's, while those same determinations are what prevent good and considering people from being well functioning in the same society. Currently, less sociopathic people are being held in society as the prisoners of the more sociopathic people.



ii.

Article: Bias-oriented decision making

A bias is a falsehood, and a mind that makes decisions based upon contrasting biases holds bias, which is a falsehood, as True. And a mind that holds what as False as True evaluate False against the truth. The considerations a person expresses are the rolling out of a blueprint for how their brain is wired, and details all the determinations and consideration they have within them.

A person who holds a bias as True is a sociopath, and those who ascertained this study's conclusions are sociopaths, whose perceptions are based on holding as True determinations based out of the weighing biases. And that is but one way which a sociopathic mind can operate. Depending on the degree of sociopathicness in a person, judgement-making will occur in other ways - some more crude, and others more considering. But all degrees of falsehood-based judgement come from a mind that is sociopathic.

In various posts, I am giving details on how a mind moves by considering, and I will further show the way which a truthful mind establishes its choice, in other posts.


But as I said in the previous post:

"And even if I don't look, sometimes there are still multiple articles that come across my view, regarding research which those working on it don't understand, or are taking in a direction that doesn't lead to the truth. And all these people are studying things for which they've already made themselves ineligible to solve, by starting out by insisting on determinations which falsify the path of considering towards their truths."



iii.

Sociopathism is endemic throughout science, because science itself is the practice of making determinations based upon observation, and therefore is methodical sociopathism, and enables and nurtures sociopathism in whomever practices it.

But a worse instance of this polarity towards evil exists in partisan and ideological politics, and the event horizon which pulls consideration towards evil is what is responsible for mob mentality, and extremist politics. Those who are susceptible to this magnetism towards evil will deny any guilt or wrongfulness all the while that they move ever closer to their evil destination, as they have aligned their consideration away from the truth, and can no longer see the truth to see how what they do measures against the truth.

Considering experiences no gap visible in the physical world, and it can pull a whole people together into a place of evil, while, if those who are pulled by it exist beneath the Reason for the pulling, they will not be able to recognize the movement in any of their observation. If a people's awareness exists is a static pocket of consideration which by their will they determine to be True, then they can appear to themselves to be morally righteous - but in the sight of the full truth, they are an abomination.

Related post: A Greater Reasoning



iv.

The truth Is, and need only be considered. But a person who is reward-oriented has falsified their mind and their ability to consider the truth, because when they engage considering, their circuit of considering is already pointed towards reward, self, and falsehood. What then will it take for them to overcome the weight of all their falsely-aligned consideration?

With God, all things are possible, and for them who believe, all things are possible. Except to a person who has relinquished all control over themselves, belief is a power and a tool, which is a 'this is' declaration, which Reason enacts upon, to permeate existing consideration as the belief considers through the existing consideration, bringing positive consideration value if the belief is good, and causing the whole consideration structure to rise. This is why Jesus said "To what should I compare the kingdom of God? It is like yeast that a woman took and mixed with three measures of flour until all the dough had risen."



Don't be misled by the appearance of progress through scientific endeavors. That progress has not come from those who have faith in science, but from select individuals throughout this world's history who were more considering of truth than others, who discovered rulesets, made of particular truthful ordering of considerations, not by any observation or scientific process, but by considering, free of determinations. The people who discovered these things then gave their tiny examples of considered truth to the public, who then have been able to move forward so long as these rulesets are followed. But each determination based upon observation introduces falsehood into an environment of considerations. This is why Jesus said "Do not judge according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgement", which is the judgement that comes from having fully considered all things.

But there exists far greater than these currently understood rulesets, which do not allow a person to see or use them unless the person first enters into and become a part of them. There is no observation in the truth.

Shrapnel

Article: Coffee Might Help You Live Longer - and Other Things of Meaning

Article: Coffee Might Help You Live Longer

Yes, coffee can help a person live longer, and protect them from many ailment conditions, because it increases dopamine-availability, and dopamine is the means by which a brain accomplishes work. Conversely, depression, anxiety, psychosis, schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, etc... all Mental Stress stems from insufficient released dopamine within a person's brain relative to the work that is trying to be considered by that brain. Cocaine, meth, crack, and many other dopaminergic substances can make a person live longer, too, even moreso than coffee.

I elucidated this first, in this post: Managing and Increasing Dopamine Can Easily Add Years to a Person's Life and Good Health

And a person who drinks coffee is equal to a person who smokes crack cocaine, in that both of them are seeking the increase in dopamine, and both of their brains fundamentally run on that very dopamine, and both of their brains benefit from that dopamine's release. There is no difference in that each of them seeks dopamine, and there is no difference in what that dopamine means to their brains.


And once again, in the above linked-to article, someone exercising Science made a mere observation within a ridiculously compartmentalized framework of being about coffee, without any understanding of its meaning (because their observation is without the knowing that comes from all considerations being inter-connected), while I had already provided the complete comprehension of the far greater reality of it all.



Another instance of everything playing out in such a manner is here: Article: Increased brain connectivity eases teenage impatience



And another is here: Can you think yourself into a different person?

While I've said all along that a brain wires and re-wires itself according to how a person considers, that a person can heal themselves of all things by belief and considering, and that a gene is a concept which considered and acceded to certainty within a person. And also that belief comes before possibility, that belief creates context between considerations, that they can be considered into one state, and that a mind is always considering towards its greatest belief.



A similar instance is here: There is Only One Truth, and It is Acting in All Things and at All Levels

... where I said "Truth is one consideration passing its full self to another without force nor resistance".

That, compared to the state of what is being perceived here: Scientists have discovered a new state of matter, called 'Jahn-Teller metals'

You could call that moment of transition in matter the 'moment of truth', where one consideration passes itself to another, causing a change in state of them both.



And there are many other such examples, some which I have made noted, and others I have not. Many things will still be merely observed by those who call themselves scientists only after I have already spoken the truth of them, and other things which before have been seemingly observed, I will speak of, having already known the full truth of them. It is and will be the same regarding all people who speak from Reason, in which all considerations are as one, and where all considerations add up to one eternal moment.



Science is fulfillment of the granfalloon - which is a meaningless association of people.

Run, it's Science!

As meaning is the product of the inter-connecting of considerations, and meaning cannot come be known through Science, because Science is the practice of making determinations based upon observation - and a determination is a falsehood by nature because it is made independently of connectivity between considerations which substantiate a thing's truth, and falsifies an outcome by short-circuiting considering. When two people speak the same words, one by a determination and the other by holding its knowing in consideration, the one who speaks by a determination speaks a falsehood, while the one who speaks from the substantiation delivered to them by considering a thing's truth speaks the truth, and only as they hear from the truth. And so the truth is speaking through that person.

A determination puts up walls between considerations, which keeps them from communicating and contributing towards a full and truthful resolution.

And the truth can only come to be known by considering all things to completion - and once all things are completed in considering, they will resolve themselves, because the truth Is - and Reason will experience, where all considerations are as one, manifesting the truth, and producing mind. And the knowing of all those considerations will be gained by the one who considered their truth.


Since is a jalopy tool of sociopaths, and it creates sociopathism with a brain and within society. And institutional medical doctrine is fraud of the most lethal kind, and is responsible for more avoidable death and suffering than almost any other source in the history of humankind.

A century of scientist conceived, endorsed, and enforced drug prohibition has killed more people than the previous century of warfare, while the truth is converse to what doctors and scientists would speak - many currently-illicit drugs can be exceptionally healthy for a person to take, far moreso beyond anything a doctor has license to provide - and a person only lives every next moment of their life from the very things which those drugs cause the greater release of acting within their brain. And a person's experience, work capability, and potential success is produced through the presence and activity of those things. Mental Stress is only the lack of natural cocaine within a person's brain, and its cure is to saturate the brain with that cocaine, the same which is released in healthier form than natural by taking real cocaine, which itself is natural.

But as I've said, what a person does while providing themselves with greater dopamine release is just as important as that they do so - and also the manner in which a greater release of dopamine is delivered can change the direction of outcome for some cases of Mental Stress ailment (a general and incomplete description of the baseline goal being to push dopamine as much as safely possible, while keeping epinephrine / norepinephrine stationary).


And to those practicing science, do not abandon the considerations you engage in work, but consider them to resolution, not by separating considerations through making determinations, but by taking all things into account so that all considerations are made equal: Every valley shall be raised up, every mountain and hill made low; the rough ground shall become level, the rugged places a plain.

There is far greater means to learn, discover, and understand than this world as a whole has yet known, which I have been making known and will continue to make known.

Shrapnel

A Scientific Fact

P.1 - Logical Reasoning Science
P.2 - Considerations adhere to Mathematics
P.3 - Mathematics is a Reason
P.4 - Considerations are Mind
P.5 - Concept of Science
P.6 - Meaning and Value for a Why



P.1

What is taught as "Logical Reasoning" uses mathematical determination to test the veracity of a statement. It can also be used to determine hierarchy within a statement.


- A Scientific Fact is 'That which is most reasonably assumed as True'

- 'That which is most reasonably assumed as True' (is less than) True

- Anything less than True is False

- A Scientific Fact (is equal to) False

- Science (is equal to) A body of certain Falsehoods



P.2

Every word, by its context, is a Concept that bears a value of its contained Considerations, all of which add up to a single True. Every Concept has a Consideration-value, and a Concept's evaluation as True or False will influence the standing of any Concept with which it is placed in context, or otherwise be influenced by the one that is True and of greater Consideration-value - nothing is idle. As long as everything continues to add up to True together, the whole still remains as a single True. But if just one Consideration is False against the remaining True, then the whole is False.

To argue this is to also argue Mathematics as a truth - but as I said, Mathematics is not a Science, and adheres to no precept or methodology of Science, but it does adhere to all precepts and principles of Reason, and is in fact a subset and Reasoning language of Reason.



P.3

I said that every Reason has all of a Value, Meaning, Purpose, and Point, and also that Reason's behavioural nature will always align as 'Flourish, Evolve, Unify' (though whether it's detected rightly by Observation is a different matter).

In a simple Mathematical equation of 5 + 5 = 10,

(5)  +  (5)  = 10    - Flourish: the fields are populated with Considerations
5  (+)  5 = 10        - Evolve: An influence of work is imparted upon them (the '+' is also a
                               consideration, and Reason for what comes after, and is creating the
                               context for Truth to appear)
5 + 5 =  (10)         - Unify: the evolved Considerations are unified into one Reason, holding a
                                Value, Meaning, Purpose and Point.

And larger Mathematical expressions merely contain increasing cycles of the same movements. Where done in iterations, Unify also comprises Flourish for the next, as where two considerations are ordered in perfect harmony, the end of the first is also the exact start of the next, with no seam, interruption, or resistance - the two are as one.



P.4

Everything is made of Considerations, and every Consideration is a quantum of Mind, and their gathering is what forms consciousness. Therefore, everything holds a quantum of consciousness within it, and every word, according to its Concept, is living.



P.5

The Concept of Science is False, with the statement "A Scientific Fact is 'That which is most reasonably assumed as True'" testifying to it. In the statement, "Reasonably" is its qualifier, marking the distinction between Science and Reason, and citing Science as False with Reason being True.

In a little more detail, 'Reasonably Assumed' is a crass qualifier, with 'based in Reason' being further the qualifier for the Assumed part of 'Reasonably Assumed'. But there is no assumption in Truth and Reason, and so Assumed is a barrier between Reason and Science. The statement says that even an Assumption is of greater veracity than Science itself, and that Reason is still more True than both of Assumption and Science. What is Assumed is still greater than what is a Lie. What is lying is Psychopathic - which I would peg as being whatever is willfully malevolent with its Sociopathism.



P.6

In another post I posed:

In the statement 'That which is most reasonably-assumed to be true', since it intrinsically defers to Reason as its governing force, why wouldn't someone just start with Reason in the first place?

The Answer is because doing so would be Smarts-based (As the Anterior Insula is home of all Smarts - Consideration, Understanding, Comprehension, and Reasoning), and Science is not Smarts-based, but Observation and Willed-determination based, and those lacking in Smarts make their livings and reputations by giving Observation-based Willed-determinations, and the institutions which train them, and their gov't licensers, establish their authorities by these things being required. But there is no authority but Truth. As I had said here previously (though maybe edited out... I couldn't find it), there is a 'worse than Hitler' hidden inlaid in every first-world convention.

There is no value to discovery as an accomplishment, as Truth is free and easy to obtain by Reason - it is all that exists. There is only value to discovering for the sake of coming to Know and be Known.

Shrapnel

False Concepts, and the Cranial Effect of Communicating Reason vs Science

Reason and Science are opposing mediums for thought communication.

Everything in the universe is made of Considerations, and all things submit to Reason's principle, as all exists through it. Every Reason is a Concept that is made of Considerations which all evaluate as True altogether in perfect harmony within, but also evaluate True together with ultimate existence.

A False-Concept is still made of inumerous Considerations, just like a Reasoned-Concept, but those considerations are ordered in a manner that evaluates as False against reality as is set by all existence (in the Mind and in the Universe, Reason is all-factoring). The grouped considerations of a False-Concept may evaluate as True among themselves though False against reality, but also could contain multiple groups, each evaluating True to themselves but False against each other, and then again against reality - a conglomeration of False-Concepts presented as one False-Comprehension.

A False-Concept is made of disordered truths, and so everything ultimately is True, but only in the right place, in the right moment, in the right order...

Reasoning is the Universe making things right.



What is produced through the Scientific Method is not based in Reason's principle, but in Willed-Determinations based on assumptions made from observations. Observation is a disconnect between observer and the observed, and thus it bears no inclusion of experience of what is, and so produces no knowing of what is - only a Willed-Determination about what may be. And those Willed-Determinations upon observation invariably produce False-Concepts.

Science bears no connection to Reason, and is its antithesis - but even False-Concepts, such as Science, still submit to Reason's principle - and in the case of both Reason and of Science, when a person speaks from either's precepts, Reason's principle still applies to the message which is given, and in the mind of whoever hears it, and towards that message.

What is based in observation traces back to observation, and cannot be known to be True, and only may be accepted through taking somebody's word as granted True - and doing such breeds Sociopathism in the mind.

What is Reasoned sparks consideration, which is on-the-spot substantiation, and imbues understanding and comprehension directly within a person's mind. But as said, a Consideration can be reasoned into place, but there is no reasoning with a Consideration. Whoever has will be given more.



What is Reasoned will substantiate in each person's own mind with consideration, and so peer-reviews are an Ultimate Uselessness in Reason, and are a device of the old-world Sociopathic rule of Science.

Consideration preempts need for demonstration, but a clear demonstration of the influence that communicating Science has upon the brain will be given at a later time. And it will be seen that the belief in Science itself, and not the technology that has come by it (which has concessionally fallen out of Reason's principle while the brain goes on a downward-spiral, and all of which can be realized far faster and better by Reasoning), is the greatest reason behind the devolution that is ongoing in the average human brain.

Reason, conversely, brings Psycheparous.

Shrapnel

The Problem with Willed-Determination & Observation Being Authority

Note: The Prefrontal Cortex is home of Willed-determinations and Working Memory, the Anterior Insula home of Consideration, Comprehension, and Truth-verifications. The two regions are antithetically purposed and with antithetical capabilities.



A Willed-Determination upon anything that is not a matter which is subjective and Self centric is a tear-down of Considering. Any presence of subjectivity will circumvent Reason, and Observation necessarily defers to Willed-Determination to produce a conclusion.

A Willed-Determination, which is all determination that comes from the Prefrontal Cortex, is subjective fabrication - but where determination is not meant to be Truth-based, such as for an arbitrary choice and commandment of Self-belief, this is OK. Truth-determination comes from the Anterior Insula - but if all the Anterior Insula's considerations are disparate, the Anterior Insula itself evaluates as False as a whole - and then its determinations, while True according to the willed-belief that the individual has built up even for over decades, are consequently lies upon whatever they're directed to.

The Prefrontal Cortex is the centre of choices, which are the exertion of Will. It is incapable of determining anything truthful, and can only choose subjectively, and regarding Self.

Consider, then, what it means regarding the trustworthiness of the average person that PET scan-activity has led researchers to perceive that the Prefrontal Cortex is the centre for determining (equating a Truth-determination with Self-determinations, though they are converse and only possible through antithetical brain-regions). Consider what it means that those writing Scientific study conclusions from observations are often those with higher Prefrontal Cortex dopamine surpluses, and that having such is instrumental to much of scholastic accomplishment. Consider also what these things mean for the veracity of scientific research output.

A Sociopathic mind makes a lot of Willed-Determinations upon all things - and doing such puts stop-orders on considerations that are related to what is being determined. This represses the output of information from the Anterior Insula to the Prefrontal Cortex, which causes the Prefrontal Cortex to have very little work to do. In turn, this maximizes dopamine-availability in the Prefrontal Cortex, which increases Working Memory, allowing for easy Fact Memorization. Prefrontal Cortex dopamine-availability is the totality of the subject of Working Memory, but Fact Memorization is antithetical to Comprehension, and there is relatively very little Comprehension in scientific study, but a deluge of Fact Memorization with misinterpretation of their meanings.

The Scientific Method is a method of Observation, but Observation is subjective and therefore a Sociopathism, and it invariably produces False results - but where Reason is absent, the greatest Sociopathic perception with the highest Consideration-Value reigns dominant. Demonstrations of Observation being comprehensively subjective and producing of False-results are paragraphs 4, and here, and here.

A Scientific Fact is whatever is most reasonably-assumed to be True - claimedly relying on both Assumption and Reason to collectively produce a conclusion, therefore testifying that the Scientific Method, itself, is fundamentally useless and of no value. However, Reason is not Observation-based, or Assumption-based, but Mind and Consideration-based, and so the Reason which the Scientific Method ends up deferring to is not Reason, at all.

Further, for every attempt to take a direct look, Truth pulls back a step. And so Science is like a dog chasing its tail - and reducing itself with every cycle it spins.


This topic is continued in the post: Why is Observation a Sociopathism? + Consideration Engagement

Shrapnel

'Reward''s Self-Nullification & Bow to Reason's Supreme-Governance, with Reason Proverb 2

If you open your eyes, both paradigms - of 'Reward' and of Physio-Fuel - resolve as meaning that Dopamine is definitively the human-physiology's purpose-for-living, what it is dependent upon, and therefore what is the foundation for all human-physiological health - that of Mind and Body, individually and collectively.

'Reward' automatically means and defines, after its Sociopathic-convolution is traversed-through till the end, that Dopamine is the singular God-molecule for all human-existence.

What this means is that those citing, implementing, regulating, and operating 'Reward' were so Sociopathic, so irresponsible, and so selfishly-lazy (all of which is Stupidity) that they didn't even finalize their own theory and conjecture, yet implemented it into Society - and they STILL didn't lift a finger to consider its Veracity, despite constructing all convention and therefore all-Societies around it, and therefore afflicting all societies with its Lethal-Poison.

This is the behaviour, trustability, and value of Reward-Sociopathism. It destroys all-Society just to pathetically pander to its invalid, unworthy, non-appreciating, and non-accomplishing self, and all before it ever realizes that it is consequently defeating itself in pursuit of itself.

What a great idiocy 'Reward' is. 'Reward', that which is its concept, is the Chief-Stupidity of all human-existence - there is, and will ever be, no other.

No matter how dumb you think you have ever been or ever might be, you will never top the unadulterated-moronism of physiological 'Reward', and that of belief in its concept as guiding-force. By dismissing and standing-apart from 'Reward', you automatically have a True-evaluation of self-identity in your Anterior Insula, making you of-Smarts, while those believing 'Reward' have surrendered their identity, for now, and in them 'Reward' is what receives a True-evaluation. A Mind non-existent won't be found anywhere once the rest fades, while a mind of-Reason cannot diminish and re-materializes once restraints fade, as it is an inseparable part of the 'Why, How, Way' of all-Existence, eternally - and apart from it, the rest of Existence also does not exist. Just as any concept is falsified with a single error, and a circuit shorted by one False-transistor, so is All-Existence apart from every smallest part of its Reason being present. Reasoned consciousness is eternal.



There is no greater Stupidity than 'Reward's concept, just as there is no greater Evil than what produces from lack of Consideration. These are Reason's hard-determined singular Truth-certainties towards these two identities - from these spills out every Stupidity and every Evil.

But every Evil justifies itself, and no Evil ever did not justify itself - there is a beyond-Hitler, beyond-Hussein, beyond-Osama, beyond-Nero and Caligula hidden and inlaid in every First-World conventional practice, and many modern-elects operate with much more Sociopathism than ever did Hitler: For all the Evil of the holocaust, the Iraq invasion occurred out of less conviction and felt-justification than did Hitler's purge of Jews, yet people's minds are like butter and no-one ever considered these things. The USA's invasion of Iraq is a beyond-the-Holocaust, and those who insisted it are beyond-Hitlers. Judging by numbers of those dead is exclusively a Sociopath's means to grade Evil - and by it the Iraq-invasion still evaluates as Evil, as per Sociopathism's inescapable Hypocrisy. Like 'Reward' is to Dopamine, Sociopathism to lack-of-Consideration, death and destruction is consequence of Evil, not its cause or purpose, and number-of-dead is inconsequential to its procedure, which is to divide itself from what it opposes, and erase that which stands apart - and every variable is ignored as irrelevant.

Smarts is suggestively the Reward for not being a Dumb-Sociopath, but then the things which Smarts produces are 'not being a Dumb-Sociopath's Reward, and so Smarts isn't a reward, but causation and purpose for what builds upon them - and those things are also their own causation and purpose. Ultimately, 'Reward' never existed except for where a Sociopath decided they weren't going to bother with consideration, and so didn't deserve the energy that was given it for perception-augmentation.

There can be no Reward which does not come unexpectedly, non-dependably, and apart from all action-considerations. If action was contingent upon a reaction, then reaction was Purpose, Meaning, Fulfillment, Resolution, and Reason for Action, and creates Appreciation for both Action and Reaction as one process.

But if Action was for Reward, then Action itself was irrelevant and merely means to reach Reward - which is exactly the reality of convention's Sociopathic non-consideration, and all Evil.


Dopamine is the Penultimate creation of the Scientific Method of cyclic test/observation, which is the quintessential Sociopathic behaviour, and its behavioural-nature fully obeys the Psychotic-state's perception-pattern of 'disjoint, fractionalize, reduce' upon whatever it is applied - and its societal-effects are corresponding.



Reason Proverb 2: Science is Sociopathic, and leaves Psychosis in its wake






Well, Dopamine is fully and exclusively as I've stated it, which is contingent upon all the convention-nullification which I've presented, which is unavoidably annihilating of all conventional-practice and theory. Everything of human-understanding must be re-written from the ground up, and I've disclosed the complete foundation for it herein. Just as Reason resolved human-physiology from True-scratch in mere months (about 2.5 - documenting it takes much longer, because it's really boring) establishing what's True of human life won't take a notable fraction of the time it took to weave such a convoluted idiocy as what stemmed from 'Reward' (and yet can't cure anything). It's all the trying to falsify everything to make it look like it fits, despite sitting on an impossible foundation, that takes millions of people a century to produce. Start with an objective-perception and do it correctly from the start, and apparently 2.5 months by one person is sufficient.

If you have millions of some monetary-denominations to spare, or less, I will appreciate some of them as donations, payment, gratitude, according to what they represent. It took maybe 2.5 months to resolve, humanology (with much still to present), but painful decades to resolve everything that comes first, and this resolution is really only the latest momentary-iteration on a decades-long-running fractal-animation of Reason. If only assigning actual subject-time, I guess human-physiological resolution had none, as it was instantaneous upon perceiving an antithetical False-statement - Reason in automation.

With merely this understanding, I have cured all of Mental Stress (psychosis, dementia, alzheimers, parkinsons, schizophrenia, lethargy, depression, anxiety... and further, including those yet-unassociated) and simultaneously all of Sociopathism (selfishness, arrogance, sadism, manipulation, stupidity, laziness), resolving their individual Falsehoods by healing what is only Singular, and returning the Realization of True-existence to humanity - and by this is generated Truth, Reason, Knowing, Compassion, Life, Existence.

This perception-shift will cure all those things automatically over some generations, as they don't exist apart from the mind first conforming its operation to belief of their foundational False-paradigm - which is being done without detection by normalization and sync to the principles embedded in the formats and necessary-implications of all received conventional information. This, too, is operation of Reason, and it is how a belief operates in the brain: For something to be assumed-True, all that its True-evaluation depends on must also be True (because this is, therefore these things also are...) - and a single assumption or genuine-belief will snap a multitude of consideration-evaluation transistors into alignment with the belief - and this is how Psychosis and Sociopathism exist in today's society. Even though their natural disappearance will take time, their is way to genuinely treat and cure all of them before their natural dissolution - for a harmful thing to exist, is has a Reason, and its Reason is also its cure.


There is yet lots to document regarding Dopamine, but also for Reason - which requires more consideration of me than Dopamine, because it doesn't have its parts and over-arching operations defined - though their mechanisms are relatable to other things, so Reason's principle of dictation by sameness and antithesis applies - resolving Reason by Reason.


The Age of Sociopathism is over. Now begins and Is the final age, the Age of Reason.

Shrapnel

The Grand Correction upon the Conventions of Reasoning

P.1 - Pre, re-cap
P.2 - Value of the Insula being insular
P.3 - What is not related
P.4 - Post-cap
P.5 - Because these things are certain...
P.6 - Reason vs Science
P.7 - Children of Reason




P.1

First, I said I would detail the reality of cranial-Reasoning, in correction of the erroneous convention - but as I regarded what actually exists as documented regarding these subjects, I was astounded by the pure gibberish that apparently currently depicts how people's brains are functioning - which is to say, they're not. I don't want to waste words, so I'm keeping this minimal, and continuing below instead with what is more important to know as the groundwork for any thing taking part in existing within this universe - and if you don't have this down, no matter how much you point to your egregiously brief inarguable present material-manifestation - you ultimately don't exist, and that manifestation will cease as its molecules fall-apart.

Anyway, a sporadic minimal correction of the convention regarding Reasoning as an action of the brain:

The Anterior Insula is an access-sealed vault that stores all your considerations in their most concept-segregated forms, with True/False, 1/0, Yes/No polarity to each of them, which is literally the transistor-effect. Apart from this effect, it is impossible for Truth-verification to exist - and if this wasn't in the Anterior Insula, human beings wouldn't be anything, they wouldn't have instincts, there wouldn't be detection between life/death, and this Human-thing wouldn't have formed - because without these values producing Truth-determination, there's no determined reason for the host-consciousness, and no value to be determined from it.



P.2

As said, the Anterior Insula is access-sealed, and that's the only possible way which Truth-verification may exist - if those values were manipulable, a person altering just a single one could invalidate their entirety, and that person's brain would instantly lose value of everything, and they'd instantly-cease. It would be division by zero, enacted upon that conscious existence. It would nullify. This is because the value of any consideration is as contextual to the rest - this is the basis principle for all Reasoning:

'Because this is certain, therefore these other things also are certain - but these further things are certain-Falsehoods' - and from this, all things can be discovered, in rapid-time. This is the foundational principle behind the Reason method I am to demonstrate.

There should consequently be no such thing as Critical-Thinking from the Prefrontal-Cortex, because this region is characterized by self-determination - which is accomplished precisely because there exists no valuation to thoughts within its range. And the Prefrontal Cortex region is dependent upon Anterior Insula output, with the Anterior Insula being aware of Prefrontal-Cortex interests, and serving them, while maintaining its consideration-vault's necessary isolation.

What is regarded as brain-activity in regions during Reasoning, etc, is merely reactionary to the actual Reasoning - and Reasoning is an extremely light-weight process-automation, and I think thousands of simultaneous streams of it can fit into the pipeline-consumption as a single normal Prefrontal-Cortex thought. It is unlikely that Reasoning displays as much of anything in PET brain scans.



P.3

Now, I really don't know what any of this literal Falsehood exists for: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reason

A person perusing that would get the impression that "R-e-a-s-o-n-" was just some miscellaneous string of letters, floating around ethereally, determined to be useful as a scrap-container for whatever junk any random person happened to need to offload - which they subsequently stuffed into it.

I don't know why all those people misused the term, but Reason is already claimed - and claimed since the origin of this universe - and it's hard-coded into existence, right here, in the concept which gives the word its definition:

What is the reason for ____? Why is ____?

Reason: the Why, How, and Way of a thing; The Answer to any condition.

So Reason literally is 'The Answer' to anything and also to everything which it is applied, making it the most valuable thing in all existence, and yet (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reason ) all this worthless junk is found to be squatting in its place. Going forward, know that all that non-Reasoning bulk is never, here at Shrapnel Reason, being referred to, and that only the literal meanings to Reason and Reasoning are regarded as existing.

Because Reason is 'The Answer', its methodology is already comprehensively complete and fully contained within its single-word domain, Reason.



P.4

Reasoning, the highest-form of all information-processing in all existence, is the revelation of Truth using only Truth. In the human brain, it is purely the consequence of inter-calculation pinging off all the Anterior Insula's considerations - and every consideration's value, no matter what it is, will contribute a Truth-certainty as well as a certain-Falsehood - upon every concept to which it's deferred.

Billions of Anterior Insula information-bits can manifest the conclusion to the most esoteric theories, near-instantly or instantly - but it won't unless a person has first structured their mind in the singular way that it is designed from the dust-up to function - with the Prefrontal Cortex as merely a vacuous creation-environment, and reserved-energy storage-cell, in which every conceived and non-conceived thing can be produced through willed-structuring of Anterior Insula consideration-determinations - deferring to the Anterior Insula to produce every concept.



P.5

'Because this is certain, therefore these other things are also certain - but these further things are certain-Falsehoods'

If someone had applied Reason's principle to the ex-convention of Dopamine being 'Reward', they would have realized this:

<--Vital---Important---Helpful---Optional---Auxiliary---Reward-->

This is a spectrum for potential attributions to the value and role of Dopamine. They all exist along a single parameter, and there will not exist a dual-placement. A molecule is an energy-concept, stored in matterial form, and is not bi-polar. Split identities will indicate two separate and incongruous concepts.

If looking at its characteristics, it's observed that the active-diminishment of dopamine has all-impacting effects upon a person's capability to operate - and also their mood, their health, their cooperation, and their resilience. Therefore, it is clear that its role is at minimal Important, though is already apparently Vital to productivity, energy. However, if it is looked at even more finely, it is seen that it is in fact the chief-motivator behind all brain-activity, and in-fact the brain will not operate apart from it. Therefore, because it is of Vital attribution in its conduct, Dopamine as 'Reward' is a certain-Falsehood.

A mere moment of applying Reason debunks decades of medical-Science convention, effortlessly - and its earlier awareness would have prevented decades of deadly-harm to individuals, and pervasive-malady across societies.

In turns medical-convention on its head, leaving it to shit all over itself.



P.6

In Science there are things referred to as hard-sciences, and then there is that which is not referred to as a hard-science. Hard-science is a misnomer, with those things labeled as hard-sciences simply being strict-Reasons, but these subjects include Mathematics, Chemistry, Physics. Logic-determination is also a hard-determiner (AKA, one of Reason's sub-formats), using Mathematical valuations to determine statements.

If logic-determination is applied to the Scientific Method, this is what produces as True:

1 - Scientific-Fact: 'That which is most reasonably-assumed to be True'
2 - 'That which is most reasonably-assumed to be True' < True
3 - Scientific-Fact < True
4 - Scientific Fact == False
5 - Scientific-Fact: a certain-Falsehood
6 - Science: A body of certain-Falsehoods

Science's procedure: Disjoint, Fractionalize, Reduce
Reason's procedure: Flourish, Evolve, Unify

Psychosis: Disjoint, Fractionalize, Reduce

And refer to P.5 to review yourselves that this is the reality: The Scientific Method and Reason Method are antithesis, and the Scientific-Method chases the exactly-False tail-end anti-Truth of a thing, while Reason amasses a Truth's full-Realization.

Reason is thousands of times more proficient than Science, and while Science produces Falsehoods, Reason cannot produce a falsehood as per its principle of dictation by hard-sameness and hard-antithesis. Reason is full-replacement of Science, and when standing-before Reason, Science is as if it never was, and of no-effect.

There will be an expanded version of this matter, later.


P.7

Reason is the language which the brain operates within, and Reason is the language of all the universe and everything that exists. Everything is knowable through Reason, and Truth is singular, and a singularity, navigable in-full by Reason.

Mathematics, Chemistry, Physics are strictly Reasons, and they adhere in-full to the principles and operations of Reason. Reason is the singular hard-determiner for All-Truth, and it doesn't experience borders to any subject, and applies equally-perfectly to every last consideration and topic in existence.

Concepts are the language of the Mind, and Reason is the language of Concepts. Everything is there-and-herein resolved.

.      -   -      .

~~~ ~~~  /       \  ~~~ ~~~

;                  .      ..      .                  ;

;                                                                    ;

 .        .        .

.  .       .  .  .     .  .  .  .  .     .  .  .       .  .

.  .     .  .

.   .

.     . .              . .     .

..       .   .   .       ..

.. . ... . . .    .. . . ....  . . . . . . .   .... .. .... .. . . . ... .. . .. . . . . . ...

So fun.

Shrapnel

A Clarification for Michio Kaku and Albert Einstein

Original/ Correction / Clarification



Einstein: "God does not play dice with the universe"

Kaku: "God plays dice with the universe, get used to it"


When faced with suggested random-acting forces in our universe, Einstein took a hard-line stance and determined that, whatever understanding for these forces would eventually be, they could not possibly prove to be random. "God does not play dice with the universe."

Yet the seemingly-random dice-throwing was still there, for everyone's observation. Although it could have been in his thoughts, Einstein's stance doesn't overtly present as being significantly reasoned, but principled - conforming and defending what Einstein trusted was a necessary characteristic for an orderly all-being. I don't know this to any degree, but it's possible that his unwillingness to consider otherwise may have prevented him from moving forward with determining what was actually being witnessed - and maybe a similar adamancy affected other research he did, and cut off some considerations. On the other hand, such certainty may have let him breeze through many issues that someone without a resolute-belief may have contended with for a long time.

Michio's ventured hard-obtuse statement doesn't waste time denying what is obvious as existing, the appearance of what looks like randomized forces in the universe, and Michio then states that God, therefore, does indeed play dice.

I suppose Einstein and Kaku were both correct and incorrect, to a quantum.



Perceived universal randomness is a temporary confusion, and not a true-property, and it's achieved by definite-forces with definite-properties interacting in a clashing way that their consequences are non-determinable to humans circa now. The intricacies of their determining calculations may be beyond our comprehension, but they are still grounded in actual properties and set values.

But dice-rolling, too, is not an instance of actual arbitration or randomness. Merely, just too-fast a process, which is too sensitive to minute details, for us to measure and determine before the die stills. Atmosphere, gravity, weight of involved-components, hand-moisture, air-current, the material and texture which the die lands on, and dirt or blemish on the die, all factor in to determine a non-random result. The things that determine what a die will cast are all very real, and not random.



Randomness is a modern Magic or Miracle. Ultimately, there can be no Random because something needs to determine a result, and if there wasn't something defined determining a result, there would be no result, and no action.

Supposing that a universe creator's capabilities would super-cede the complexity of the apparent randomnesses: Ultimately, God still does not play dice with the universe. Maybe poker.



Accurateness in understanding is important, often essential to research, because people's internal concept or definition for a thing partially determines what they look for in results, and what will unintentionally stand-out to them, apart from their looking for it. Inaccurate conclusions lead to inaccurate, missed, and mis-purposed conclusions in further research - and I think that whether its in a short, long, or way-off term, undiscovered and erroneous information will affect a lot of people's lives.

Shrapnel