Consideration-Value, and Other Things of Mental Consideration

When you consider, your mind is working out how to bridge an understood piece of information to another that is not yet understood - and once it succeeds, the two items become one body of information, and recollection of any of its details brings forth the culmination of all considerations that are contained within it. There is no travel-time in a singularity, and every detail within such a body of information is effortlessly known whenever any of them experience relation to any incoming information. A concept is made of smaller concepts, and there can be millions upon millions of instantaneously accessible concepts within one larger comprehension.

Completion of a consideration produces an instantaneous new understanding, or a knowing, and with smaller ones it could be like a synapse suddenly turning on. When the consideration is very low in its overall value, it can experience as scarcely anything - but it all culminates and later considering could contain thousands and then millions of equal Consideration-Value per amount of work. Every typical consideration is culmination of countless prior considerations, and I'm sure there could be trillions of trillions of lowest-form considerations involved in large ones.



As every completed considering creates a new concept which is made up of all its contained considerations, there is inherent numeric value in their total contained lowest-form individual considerations, and so there is also hierarchy in contrasted considerations and concepts, based on their total number of contained smallest-value considerations. Still, every concept, made up of a grouping of Considerations, presents a value of 1 for the overall concept. Considerations of equal contained Consideration-Value would be of equal hierarchy and authority in the mind.



The Anterior Insula has an output, which itself is a Consideration - and if all considerations are reasoned in-line with this single output consideration, then all information a person has within them is fully-known and accessible instantly, at any moment, and in any capacity.

A person's mind is the sum-total of all their considerations that are considered or reasoned together (so if a person doesn't have any...), and their fully-controllable mind is the sum-total of all these that are synced with the output consideration of the Anterior Insula, though potentially countered and offset by those that are not. Groups of considerations that are not synced with this output consideration probably were until being harmed by bigger mental stresses. A scattered, disoriented, or delirious mind is discordant in its considerations, and a fully torn mind can be no different than having more than 1 person within a single body - as those considerations are consciousness, and their thorough separation creates multiple bodies of consciousness. But cycles sit within each other, and one will have more control than others - although whatever has greater Consideration-Value will be able to exert more effort to manipulate a dominance. In the end, if their discrepancies are fully considered, they will be re-bridged, and unified back into one form of consciousness.

Shrapnel

Thoughts are the Fragments of Will

Thought is subjective and therefore a Sociopathism - but it can take thought, including extensive thought, for someone to spark the gears of automatic-considering into rolling, and cycling. Conversely, where automatic-considering is already ongoing but hijacked by negative or progression-negating sentiments, it can take willed-cessation of all thoughts to pull-taut the mind back into full control again.

Once things are rolling positively, there needs to be full support of Will put behind that considering, to push it in an upwards direction and keep growing it. As considerations sync (What I've called Consideration-Groups) they will add to each other's strength - whether positive or negative.

Ultimately, there is no thought in Reasoning, as there is no travel-time or differentiation between considerations that are reasoned together - they are synced, functioning as their own singularity. And the value of work produced for everything that is perfectly reasoned is always just 1, and that reasoning is True.

Thought is merely Will, fragmented. Reasoning produces experience, and knowing - not thought.

Thought's resolution produces Will, and thought requires dopamine-availability to occur, control, and produce considering that leads to resolving thought, by reasoning itself into Will. Therefore, Will's recipe is:

- 1-part Prefrontal Cortex dopamine-availability
- 1-part considering until experienced-reason

Mix until evenly leavened. Then let the fucker rise - consciousness layers.



Thought ->- Considering-->--Reason-->--Will-->--Considering-->--Reason-->--Will-->--Considering... cycling.

And crescendoing unto eventual Reasoning.

And Reasoning, which has Will within it, directing its objectives, can still exert Will while continuously Reasoning. And Reasoning draws all considerations into itself.

Shrapnel

Reason's Primary Principle - Everything Necessarily Means Everything Else

Because this is True, therefore these other things are also certain - but these further things are certain-Falsehoods

Everything Necessarily Means Everything Else

Shrapnel

Researchers find close partners develop a 'shared' memory - Explanation

This is a good companion article to supplement the previous post's.

Researchers find close partners develop a 'shared' memory

One adopts Pref Cort - and each other creating a cycling between the two bodies' minds rather than the whole process happening within one body's mind. One might (not necessarily) adopt a more Pref Cort dominance and the other a more Ant Ins contribution, and they cycle through each other. Such polar role-adoption is the explanation of cliche male/female relationship roles.

A mind knows what it's tuned to (Reason-syncing, just as the Ant-Ins syncs all its inner considerations), and response to what it's sync'd with is mechanical, no need for aware-consciousness. This refers to one spouse passing shortly after the other, if the spouse is non-conscious - the shared-tuning will even be fact long before enactment.



Everything is Considerations, transitioning all energy between all things within the universe - there isn't a wall between any of it.

If there was full separation between any considerations (such as a person, a mind, a thought, a cell) and other consideration, the two wouldn't be observable within the same reality. The universe wouldn't experience the other, and the other wouldn't experience the universe. They would be two separate existences, not aware of each other and not able to experience each other - and so exerting no influence upon each other. They would pass right through each other without effect, and each would be to the other as if non-existent. This does happen, but not in the case of these articles' subjects.


These two companion articles together bear the same inter-completing relationship as the Prefrontal Cortex and the Anterior Insula - as Will and Reasoning.

Shrapnel

After 62 years of marriage, California couple dies 4 hours apart - Explanation

After 62 years of marriage, California couple dies 4 hours apart

Lots of these reports, and a simple reason for their cases:


Dopamine is power and control of thought - which makes it 1-half of Will.

Will to die is a dopamine-involved directive to shut-down will-regulated dopamine releases, which ceases Anterior Insula cycling, which stops the release of Nor/Adrenaline to power the circulatory-system, which stops the heart, which enacts willed-death.

Resignation is also a matter of will, just as lack-of-will is.

Will can be triggered by reasoned electronic signal, or by force through dopamine-availability - and the movement of one causes the movement of the other. Ultimately, however an initiation is focused, the two move together to form a unified electro-chemical exertion.

Every mechanism in the metabolic pathway can be triggered by Will - though it's not something I'm expecting to detail soon.

But, in essence, Willed-Belief enacts Reason's primary principle throughout the Anterior Insula's considerations - which triggers metabolic mechanisms. Hmm, maybe I just did detail it.


Oh, and... Science is a dumb shit blah, blah.

Shrapnel

To Add to Other Study Links

A couple more of the same study scenario bearing the same results, analysed by different incomplete perceptions.


2007:
Cocaine self-administration improves performance in a highly demanding water maze task.


2009:
Prenatal cocaine increases dendritic spine density in cortical and subcortical brain regions of the rat.



These add to...


1989:
Cocaine enhances memory storage in mice


And, of course, the 2013 version of the same thing. I'm sure it's a standard study, by the looks of it. The results just go absolutely nowhere afterwards - except in the case of the 2013 study, where they go swirling down a fabricated hole.

Shrapnel

Bit of Clarification For Previous Posts' Terminologies

Note that chemical activity is still only 1-half of all human physiological experience and issue

"Btw, Prefrontal Cortex dopamine-availability is exactly Cocaine's effective result: Cocaine inhibits this dopamine's reuptake while inhibiting nor/adrenaline uptake"


For anyone who didn't follow all terminology used in the post: A Reason is a concept and a concept is a Reason - Part 1


Uptake = Activation: A molecule is taken from inactive storage and placed where it is in active-duty.

Reuptake = Deactivation: A molecule is take out of active-duty and placed back into inactive storage, or dismissed.

Regulation / Upregulation / Downregulation = Overall shift in Activated-volume of a certain chemical (in the case of this subject, it would likely either refer to Dopamine or Adrenaline).

Dopaminergic = A molecule which imparts a near-direct influence on a body's dopamine activity.

Dendritic Spine = Dendritic Spines grow in reaction to learning, and their density and size reflect the amount of information learned within the span of time during which they were created. Consider their growth-pronouncement as relative to the amount of information the brain processes.



Cocaine does not affect the dopamine that's released, or produced (it's the exact same natural dopamine that existed in the body prior to stimulation), but it shifts the reuptake of dopamine so that the gate, or mechanical-arm (whatever is more accommodating to conceptualize) which removes dopamine from active-duty downscales its removal-quota over a given period of time (or Cycles of work from the Anterior Insula). And, while doing this, it lowers the ratio for Nor/Adrenaline to be activated against dopamine activity.

Pretty scary, huh?

More dopamine, less adrenaline... that's human brain-and-body idealism - except for where there isn't conscious, subconscious, and further consideration-output from the Anterior Insula for the brain to make use of any gained mental-task processing fuel... which doesn't likely apply to anyone with chronic Mental Stress ailment. When a sociopath increases their already-wasted active-dopamine-surplus, they likely just become more of a sociopath - with no appreciation, no de-stressing, no gained think-ability, and no health-benefit.



----------------------------------------------------



Btw, when people talk about an "adrenaline rush", what is effectively meant is that there is a cocaine rush / dopamine rush (same thing) present - as dopamine is what adrenaline sympathetically releases in response to (though release-ratios can fluctuate - they are still bound). There is nothing pleasurable about adrenaline by itself: It is an agitator, a / the creator of experienced-stress, it pushes thoughts out of reach of control (this is why Dopamine and Adrenaline are effectively antitheses), and it is very unpleasant in feel. It is only that which provokes its release that 'adrenaline rush' seekers appreciate.

So when you read something like:

"He loves the adrenaline. He loves the jolt. He loves the thrill"

You can know that what's basically meant is 'he's a coke-head', just like his dumb, moron of a son.


Prefrontal Cortex dopamine == Cocaine, and Cocaine == Prefrontal Cortex dopamine. It's too bad that all the dumbest (hypocrite) sociopaths are the ones controlling the voice for what is the definitive exact-cure for a large variety of worst and most-prevalent human ailments - and I'll detail each of their exact applications and mechanism-considerations as I go.


Oh, and "==" is programming syntax for 'is equal to', which is different than 'equals' as the end-result of an equation, or 'is equivalent to', implying they are just very comparable. 'Is equal to' means it is one and the same.

Note that chemical activity is still only 1-half of all human physiological experience and issue

Shrapnel

One More Addendum (Cocaine, Methamphetamine, Adderall, as Relative)

Remember:

Cocaine is - Dopamine+++++ Nor/Adrenaline --
Methamphetamine is - Dopamine +++ Nor/Adrenaline +++ Seratonin +
Adderall is - Dopamine ++ Nor/Adrenaline +++ Seratonin +

And all their produced effects, any side-effects, and interactions are explainable through simply this.



And remember that Dopamine is in every region of the brain, and 'facilitates the transmission of information across neurons', which means to say: Dopamine is mental-task processing fuel.

And know that Cocaine, Methamphetamine, and similar drugs are not literally addictive: The body does not build a need for them, and 'addiction'-rates vary between 1/4 to 4/10 of people using them - the reasons for which I will provide, along with their resolution. There is a clinical discrepancy between Chemical and Psychological addiction - but Psychological addiction is not an addiction, and calling it such is a great lie, a cop out, and complicit in creating and strengthening any existing behavioural habit.

Shrapnel

And, Plus, Also, etc... (A Cocaine / Dopamine Study Reprisal)

Here is an earlier take on the same study-scenario with Cocaine and lab mice, which discovered none of the 2013 version's conclusions:
Cocaine enhances memory storage in mice


The exact same study has been repeated many times over the past decades, always showing the same thing: Cocaine enhances learning, memory, and cognitive ability, by increasing the rate of dendritic spine production.

The only time the recycled study has been concocted to produce the 2013 study's nonsensical results is in that 2013 study.

It must be wondered why the same simple study is repeated so much, and then forgotten a week or so after each time.





Dendritic Spines grow in reaction to learning, and their density and size reflect the amount of information learned within the span of time during which they were created.


----------------------------


Also,

I've cleaned up the previous post I made - writing with a 2-week long migraine which practically blinded ability to see, visually and mentally, let alone think to type a post... plus other pains... is tough and I prefer to not write in such times. However, I hate not unveiling further reality-correcting consideration even more.

Shrapnel