Addendum to the Previous Post about Parkinson's Receptibility to Dopamine, and also Something of Psycheparous

Related post: Article: Asthma drugs may reduce Parkinson’s risk (yet another lap around the same track)


I've explained this before, and it deserves representation wherever talking about dopamine treatment for an ailment like Parkinson's, where the contemporary medical practitioner's presumption is that dopamine treatment of the ailment works at first, but eventually loses its effectiveness.



i.

With most all dopaminergics, when a person takes them, they're increasing both dopamine-availability, and adrenergic influence in their brain.

The more that dopamine is increased, the easier it is for a brain to connect information across synapses, to sync considering processes, and to process work to its conclusion and free up that pipeline space within a brain. However, as adrenergic influence is increased, the faster the brain tries to work, and the more dopamine is required to handle the increased workload of the brain. So, increasing adrenergic influence alongside dopamine is applying antithetical influences, and does a lot to undermine the goal of attending to states that are in need of an increase of dopamine, such as the dopamine deficiency ailment of Parkinson's.

When people taking dopaminergic drugs like meth get wired out, twitchy, and agitated, that's because of the adrenergic influence on the brain's processes over time outpacing the more temporary sought dopamine boost that those drugs give. The influence of the dopamine increase is immediate, and positive, but the influence on processes from the adrenergic increases is more inlaid, compiling over time, and lasting after the dopaminergic influence and benefit has worn off.

When taking dopaminergic Parkinson's medication, it initially helps because it is increasing dopamine, and that's always giving a positive work capacity boost to the brain, which immediately alleviates away as much of the top-layer negative impacts of the ailment as there is supplemented dopamine to address. But, at the same time, the brain is also being fed an increase in adrenergic influence, which will be feeding the source of the ailment all the while in the background.

So, over time, dopaminergics become less effective, not because dopamine stopped being what the brain needs, but because the adrenergic influence that was simultaneously being administered as a consequential component to the dopaminergic influence has contributed towards accelerating the ailment to the point that the dopamine aspect of the medication is no longer a significant influence against the ailment.

There aren't many dopaminergics that do much to inhibit adrenergic influence, but cocaine is one of them, and is what makes it such an effective treatment for mental stress ailments. I would say that if cocaine was used, rather than the various medicines that are currently used to treat Parkinson's, that there wouldn't be witnessed the same eventual ineffectiveness of the dopamine treatment as the ailment overcame its reach. And if used with understanding of Psycheparous to manage the movement of signals in a person's brain, then a full cure is in reach of anybody.

Keep in mind that what I've said would only apply to pure cocaine, as the things that street cocaine is cut with frequently add negative adrenergic influence of their own.



ii.

Conventional medicine is mired in an identity crisis, where it can't make up its mind whether it wishes to be good, or to be evil; whether it wants to cure people, or accomplish its ideology. When treating an ailment with part cure, part poison, then there isn't a full will present to cure that ailment, and the practitioner's interests are divided, and they end up failing to do good.



If asking a doctor: Do you want to cure this person, or not?

They might say: Yes, I want to cure that person.

And if it is then said to them: OK, so do what will cure that person.

Then their mind detaches itself from the context of the discussion, and they default into a programmed ideological determination of: We don't want to give people things that encourage non-medical substance use.

Which means that their honest answer to the question of 'Do you want to cure this person whose ailment is cause by lack of this specific thing, relative to the influence of these other things?' is: No, I do not want to cure that person - because the word 'cure' in that context is a stand-in which represents doing the very thing that is the person's cure. It's like a pointer, that references a container in which is held the considerations that fulfill the meaning of Cure for that particular person's situation.

Just as Jesus said 'you cannot serve mammon and God,' it is also true that a person cannot simultaneously serve ideology and still do what is good. An ideology is something that a person determines and sets up to replace the truth as their guide.



iii.

Just as considerations are polar, the signals that are considering through a person's brain present a workload for that brain. That workload carries a value to it, and dopamine-availability also presents a value of work potential. When there isn't enough dopamine to address presented workloads, it is possible for the workloads to do damage to that brain, as those signals are being pulled through the brain by Reason with force. Things can break, splintering one process into many that each need the same value of dopamine as the former one process did. Also, considering can collapse, and call fall into failure, including a failure that keeps considering over and over as a negative loop. And considerings that collapse into each other can form a black hole-like force, made by their compounding polarities all directing towards a point that draws in other consideration... and this is how granfalloons become created, as considerations are pulled out of the truthful context that gives them their meaning.

However, likewise, when a mind is filled positive truthful belief, the considering of that mind lifts it up with great strength into ever-greater truth, being the example of 'to whoever has, more will be given.' And many things will continually be resolved in that person, with them progressively filling up with light as they do so. Such considering represents the 'streams of living water' that Jesus spoke of, which he said become a 'spring of water welling up to eternal life.' As I've said, life is the movement created by considering, and considering is the movement created by considerations being considered by and flowing through other considerations.

Shrapnel

Article: Asthma drugs may reduce Parkinson’s risk (yet another lap around the same track)

Article: Asthma drugs may reduce Parkinson’s risk



i.

This isn't a mystery, and it shares the same explanation as a great multitude of other ailment-medication responses: Clenbuterol increases dopamine, and dopamine is the human brain's work fuel, and is what it uses to connect information across synapses. Any time dopamine is being increased, a brain's work capacity is being increased, and any time dopamine is reduced, a brain's capacity for work is reduced and stress is increased. Mental stress is merely a lack of dopamine availability within a brain relative to the amount of work a brain is trying to do, and is comparable to dehydration being a lack of water, and asphyxiation being a lack of oxygen.

Depression, anxiety, psychosis, ADHD, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, schizophrenia... they all emerge from the state of stress that is dopamine deficiency, and they can all be effectively treated, even cured, by increasing dopamine while inhibiting adrenergic influence. The interrupted fetus development that is autism is again a case of insufficient dopamine availability within a pregnant mother, and autistic child-births can also be prevented by ensuring dopamine levels are high enough relative to other things in a pregnant mother.

Relatedly, what is called the placebo effect is positive belief reducing the micro states of uncertainty and worrying (those things causing considering in a brain, which is the work of a brain for which dopamine is required), which reduces the work in a brain, which frees up dopamine availability for a brain, which consequently leads to improved health.

Most dopaminergics have an unfavourable adrenergic influence alongside their positive dopaminergic influence, and increasing adrenergic influence worsens stress states. However, cocaine is one dopaminergic which does inhibit adrenergic response, and is excellent at inhibiting adrenergic response while greatly increasing dopamine availability within a brain.

In fact, when applied with understanding, it is possible to flush a severe and long-existing psychosis from a person in just a mere couple of hours, or less, using pure cocaine.



ii.

And don't forget Schizophrenia:

Exhibit A) Study Suggests Genetics Could Be The Root Cause Of Schizophrenia

"The findings may help explain the longstanding mystery of why brains from people with schizophrenia tend to have a thinner cerebral cortex with fewer synapses than unaffected individuals do," said a press statement from the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, whose experts took part in the study.

This is the brain's outer layer, often referred to as grey matter, involved in learning and memory."


Exhibit B) Mice Fed with Cocaine Show Growth in Brain Areas Linked with Learning, Memory

Looks like we have a match!


It's also the same reason why Methylene Blue helps against Alzheimer's, why coffee does the same and can help a person to live longer, why Modafinil is a "smart drug", why teenagers who lack what fuels a person's working memory capabilities end up using dopaminergic drugs while simplifying life helps prevent future mental illness, why poverty has the effect on people that it does, and why a million other dopaminergics help against a million dopamine-deficiency ailments:

An Eclectic Assortment of Articles, Which All Receive Resolution by Understanding Dopamine

A Few More for: An Eclectic Assortment of Articles...

The Third Entry Into "An Eclectic Assortment of Articles, Which All Receive Resolution by Understanding Dopamine"


It's all one thing - same cause, same solution.



iii.

Dopamine is only "reward" to a sociopath, who, because of their low consideration, associates the increased dopamine availability they experience from doing the types of things which they have determined to indicate that they are good little dogs as being a confirmation of their good little dogginess. This understanding is an inversion of the truth. What's actually happening is the same thing as happens with placebo:

"positive belief reducing the micro states of uncertainty and worrying (those things causing considering in a brain, which is the work of a brain for which dopamine is required), which reduces the work in a brain, which frees up dopamine availability for a brain, which consequently leads to improved health, cognitive strength, and positive feeling."


To someone that isn't a sociopath, dopamine is not "reward," or something that comes in the end, but physio-fuel, and what is required to be there in the beginning for proper and intended functionality, and for proficient and healthy development. To human physiology, it is the god-molecule.


Conventional medicine is firstly about ideology and profit, and not truth. The truth is that an enormous host of illnesses, particularly mental illnesses, all only emerge and branch from mental stress, which itself is simply a lack of dopamine availability in a brain relative to the amount of work that brain is trying to accomplish.

And much research that is done concerning related topics is primarily about the researcher seeking to experience peer-approved "reward" for conforming to and supporting a dogmatic ideology.


To sum the situation up from one angle: Institutional and academic medical doctrine is fake. It is the 21st century's equivalent of practising the four humours, and would only be more so if the four humours was a patented practice that earned its patent-holders money every time it was practised.



iv.

because it strips them of all the determinations they've used as justification for


Why do today's scientists revel in historical stories such as Galileo facing off against an institution of dogmatic ideologues who had all the evidence they were willing to consider to prove that Earth is the centre of the universe, when today's scientists are the same as the people Galileo faced off against?

And this is a pattern that has occurred throughout history: An individual person considers beyond conventions because of the greater belief they have within themselves, and by their consideration discovers new marvels that they then make known to everybody.

But all those who move by determinations oppose the greater consideration presented, because what is presented strips those people of all the determinations they've made to justify themselves, invalidating their prejudiced judgments, their perceptions of their statuses, their reputations as knowledgeable authorities...

In time, however, the greater truth become reinforced as indisputable, and then those whose truth is their determinations begin to make determinations about everything surrounding the new thing and begin turn it into an ideology, an institution, and a dogma. Then, sociopaths from all over flock to that thing and conform to it, not because they understand and know it, but because the appearance of consensus is what they take as truth. And they reinforce that thing with all kinds of extraneous infrastructures, and wave that thing all around as their "proof" of many other things, including why they're smarter than the dogmatic ideologues of history who did the same thing as they are doing - because now they have the right determination to conform to and invest their sentiments into.

But the truth is not a determination.



Related post: Addendum to the Previous Post about Parkinson's Receptibility to Dopamine, And Also Something of Psycheparous

Shrapnel

Subject Re-Summarization and Article Dump + Beware of Abstraction-based Doctrine

Cocaine study that got up the nose of the US
Nixon official: real reason for the drug war was to criminalize black people and hippies
It's not just stem cell research that's overhyped— medical science spin is a widespread problem
Everything You've Heard About Crack And Meth Is Wrong
Hyperbole Hurts: The Surprising Truth About Methamphetamine
Why the Myth of the Meth-Damaged Brain May Hinder Recovery
Methamphetamine: Fact vs. Fiction And Lessons From The Crack Hysteria
7 Facts About Drugs and Addiction That Will Make You Question Everything You Know
The Rational Choices of Crack Addicts
Mice Fed with Cocaine Show Growth in Brain Areas Linked with Learning, Memory
Cocaine enhances memory storage in mice
Cocaine self-administration improves performance in a highly demanding water maze task


The relative dangers of drugs: What the science says

If all other things are equal, a person who drinks alcohol is doing more damage to their health and at greater risk of developing habitual usage than users of any other drug. That should put warnings about other drugs into perspective, along with the trust-worthiness of the researchers and institutions issuing warnings about drugs, rather than safe-usage information. And when institutions and researchers refuse to supply harm-reduction and safe-usage information out of ideological belief, they are making the statement that they would rather see people dead then using drugs safely. Such people have the will for murder of whoever doesn't agree with them in their hearts.


A person whose motivation is self-reward rather than the truth has made a determination to falsify an environment of considerations to make reason for their action, and is acting sociopathically. Also, the belief in reward as motivation conditions a brain to be psychopathic. The human brain does not run on reward, and the reward philosophy in contemporary behavioural studies is a false doctrine. The human brain uses dopamine to connect information across synapses, and to process information to resolution. Cocaine's enjoyable effect in the increase of dopamine in a person's brain.

Those who speak of "reward" in substance-related studies are identifying themselves as junkies, since they have called dopamine reward, and call reward as their motivation. But dopamine is not what comes at the end, but is what has to be there are the start, so that effort and potential can exist. And when work is resolved, dopamine is returned to availability. But without dopamine being there in the first place, there is no potential for work.


How come people who drink 5 glasses of water a day, or who eat 3 meals a day aren't called addicted, and their addictions to drinking water and eating food studied, while those addicts are themselves persecuted for their addictions?

If dopamine were addictive, then every human alive would already be addicted, since they are born with their brain experiencing and running on the same effect as cocaine - and then addiction would be an inconsequential or even a very good thing, because it would precisely be due to having that addiction that humans exist and live.

If a person is constantly seeking to increase their dopamine, then it is likely that they are lacking dopamine to begin with - as is the case with mental stress-based ailments such as depression, anxiety, psychosis, ADHD, schizophrenia. Even simple fatigue is an expression of a state of dopamine availability within a person's brain.

"Addiction" is an ignorant term, on par with racist epithets that were also once taken to represent sentiments presumed by many to represent truths. The term addiction does nothing to accurately convey what a situation is, and makes to effort to explain itself. It is a cop-out, and an excuse to write a conclusion for research when the researcher has no understanding of what their research actually shows.

Also, the human brain is a drug bath. So, if drugs killed, an impression that a lot of research aims to push, then everybody would be dead. Unfortunately, a lot of researchers experience "reward" from propping up dogmatic ideology-based drug attitudes, which has turned medical substance research into an industry of propaganda, ignorance, and the confirmation bias of people who want attention and money for completing research, but can't figure how to turn their observations into conclusions. Studies that base their understanding in abstractions, such as "addiction", and "reward", are not focused on reality.

Things haven't changed all that much since Reefer Madness.




The modern recycling of the same and additional lies have simply been inlaid into more technical presentations, and naively parroted and argued by people who want attention and money for completing research, but can't figure how to turn their observations into conclusions - and also whose truth has always been conformity to the appearance of authority, and who have difficulty allowing themselves to consider the possibility that if they didn't just accept on faith that the drug ideology tropes they evaluated their own moral righteousness by simply were, that they suddenly find that they don't know what to do or write. Even what is already dead can experience fear of death as it turns to cross over into life.

Shrapnel

Article: 'Study Relates High Intelligence Gene to Autism' + How Drug Prohibition (Rather Than Drugs) Attacks Mental Health

i.

Article: Yale study suggests genes associated with high intelligence also associated with autism


As I've said many times now:

Considering is the work of a brain, and is the work for which dopamine is required - to handle the association of information across synapses that are not yet perfectly reasoned together (once perfectly reasoned, there is no more disjointment between information, and no work for which dopamine is required - those fully-reasoned considerations are as one).

The more work a brain is trying to do (the more things it is considering, the more connections across synapses it is trying to make) the more dopamine it requires to properly perform that work, and to bring it to its resolution. Therefore, genes related to high intelligence indicate situations where there was required more dopamine to complete the work involved.

Gene development is an output of signal-routing in a human's brain. If there are issues with gene-development in a mother, then they hint at issues with the signal-routing by which their creation is directed - which hints at there being insufficient dopamine to handle a brain's workload.

If a mother already experiences issues with the signal-routing that develops her own genes, then, especially since pregnancy is straining on a mother's dopamine to begin with, it's expectable that there would be an expression of it in the development of her child - since its fetus development is woven by the same brain, using its dopamine-availability, and its signal-routing. And if the design template for a child is more complex, then the more dopamine there needs to be available in the mother's brain to properly fulfill its design.

Autism is caused by a mother having insufficient dopamine in her brain while pregnant to handle the signal-routing required for full development of the baby, resulting in interrupted development. Cocaine's effect is the significant increase of available dopamine in a person's brain, while inhibiting the stress-increasing uptake of norepinephrine by the heart, and so taking cocaine while pregnant can prevent autistic births, while also creating a more robust and thoroughly-developed body and brain for the born baby.

Autism is a direct expression of a pregnant mother's own insufficient dopamine-availability for the workload of creating her baby's body and brain.



ii.

What I've explained about belief (which is a 'This Is' command), invoking Reason, which causes considering, creating workload for a brain that doesn't cease and which requires dopamine to assemble information across synapses to either consider matters to their resolutions, or for falsification of the considering to be made by way of making a determination (a determination bein a falsehood by nature, saying 'these considerations, but not these others')... formulates the E=mc2 of mental health.

Mental distress exists in the world today because institutional medical doctrine, those who have created it, and those who have conformed to it (whose truth is conformity to the appearance of authority - often so that they can experience what they've disgracefully labelled their "reward", which is the dopamine they have prevented those in need of it from accessing) are in opposition to the truth of mental health, and are responsible for many people's continued and severe suffering.

Just as how oil companies produce paid-for false information in their "science" reports to keep threats to its business away, how car manufacturers falsify emissions tests to advertise and sell their cars, how the privatized and for-profit USA prison system invests in creating criminals to incarcerate, how weapons manufacturers invest in creating pretext for wars to create business for themselves, and how political parties are often creating negative propaganda against their opponents... well, the same is true of the medical industry, which creates false research to keep effective medications away from the public, while promoting patented, ineffective medications, and making easy for the public to access (and also to pander to and feed desires for "reward"). And what is a more attractive target for exploitation to those whose belief is self-benefit, than the vital necessities for every human? I think that there is no more prostituted and falsified industry than that of "healthcare."

And what aids the profiteering schemes of drug prohibition and and institutional medicine is that the middle-persons administering them have a belief-set that renders them too simplistic to clue in to the reality, because they're rationalized their status and their judgment upon others as "reward" for their conformity to those monstrous ideologies - and since these are people whose professed truth is self-gratification (which is what self-determined "reward" is all about), many of them are people who will defend a lie even when they know it is a lie, because in doing so they're defending their own comfort, their own reputation, their own profession, their own actions, their own judgments against others... in doing so, they're defending so much that they have held on to, yet which evaluates as False and injustice.

Asking many of them to do what is good and truthful (which are not separate things) is like asking a rich king who in a castle, who believes their status to be a matter of having noble blood (rather than having been in a position to take everything from everyone around them, and having done so), to evenly disperse their wealth and sources of more wealth among the citizens of their kingdom, who live in filth and poverty.



iii.

As I have said, drug-prohibition creates the mental health issues that have been falsely designated to the (far healthier than pharmaceutical) drugs that are taken in an environment of anti-drug attitudes and threats of judgment, violence, legal persecution, ostracization...

A human's brain fundamentally runs on the effect of cocaine, and that will not change.

Now, when a person believes that it is OK to engage in any action, then their mentality, which comprises their whole experience and inner health, is safe in performing that action. But when a person is not fully certain of the rightfulness of an action they take, taking that action causes inner judgment against their own mind, which is the state of some considerations evaluating other considerations of the same mind as not irreconcilable, and creates a divide in the mind.

Considerations are always trying to fulfill the image of all-True, in accordance with the belief they are in. When a person believes in something, and that belief causes the truth of what they believed in to consider into them, that person has ingested all the considerations that comprise the belief that they held as True, and they have become a part of that person.

By the way, this is why Jesus said "I tell you the truth, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you."

(And as I've said at the bottom of this post, life is the movement created by considering)


So, when a person's own action appears as False against any part of the considered (though possibly not wilfully chosen) belief of taking drugs, or of taking certain drugs, or of taking certain drugs in certain conditions, or of hiding their behaviour from people, or having to choose between what their experience registers as good and their acceptance from others... that creates considerations that evaluate as True in a branch of considering, but which are evaluating as False in light of other branches of considering, and yet both branches are streaming a constant stream of considerations as they try to fix any portion of their experience that is not perfectly True in the overall whole. And everything a person experiences is the considering of considerations, and so this creates an agitated and confused state within a person.

That fracturing of the whole mind, and all the considerings that it causes, and all points of considerations being at odds with other considerations and considerings (which are the stress, agitation, and panic that all greater mental health issues branch from), are work to a brain, and require dopamine to fix - and the more breakage there is, the more non-uniformity between considerations of one human brain, the more dopamine it takes to support it all, and to work with it all, and to consider things back into one wholeness.

But the problem was never the usage of any drug, or of having an interest in increasing dopamine - those are acceptable and needed things for a human, so that they can have good mental health. The problem was the acceptance of false messaging from institutional medicine, government, law enforcement, which made people feel guilty, uncertain, and self-doubting by doing what is the equivalent of drinking water to stay hydrated and healthy.

Drug prohibition kills and steals, while the greatest danger involved in taking drugs is the activating of considerations imposed by anti-drug messaging in a manner that causes them to evaluate as True against a person, which causes mental distress, and a need for increasing dopamine.

Drug prohibition has always been a falsehood, built upon falsehoods, and administered by the expression of falsehoods. When a person believes institutional medicine and its practitioners concerning drug use, they are accepting a lethal poison into themselves, which will harm them from the inside any time they engage in behaviour that contravenes what is itself a malevolent lie and falsehood.

A human fundamentally requires dopamine to be mentally and physically healthy - and when they're in distress, they require more dopamine to hold themselves together and reach a positive resolution in their brain and body.



Imagine if, despite needing water to live, some people convinced others that anyone who drinks water is a bad person, and that drinking water will cause them to become dependent upon it. And so, so long as people believed that, anyone who would drink water would experience all kinds of bad things to happen to them, and also become increasingly thirstier for more water. But if they had never heard that drinking water was bad, nothing bad would happen to them if they drank it.

Because belief aligns considerations and causes considering, which is what produces all behaviour and experience, and is also the work for a brain that requires dopamine, that situation is how things are with the conscious taking of dopaminergic substances.

If a person even passively accepts into their mind a concept that causes their own considerations to evaluate against them when they do what is even a vital and completely appropriate action, then any time that a person does that action, they will be causing their own mind to consider against them - increasing their brain's workload, decreasing their inner comfort, decreasing their capacity to work things out for themselves, increasing their need for more dopamine... all because they accepted a false message that ruled against their own body's fundamental needs, and the sovereignty of their mind.



This understanding is the basis of what the apostle Paul wrote:

"Therefore let us stop passing judgment on one another. Instead, make up your mind not to put any stumbling block or obstacle in the way of a brother or sister. I am convinced, being fully persuaded in the Lord Jesus, that nothing is unclean in itself. But if anyone regards something as unclean, then for that person it is unclean. If your brother or sister is distressed because of what you eat, you are no longer acting in love. Do not by your eating destroy someone for whom Christ died. Therefore do not let what you know is good be spoken of as evil. For the kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking, but of righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Spirit, because anyone who serves Christ in this way is pleasing to God and receives human approval.

Let us therefore make every effort to do what leads to peace and to mutual edification. Do not destroy the work of God for the sake of food. All food is clean, but it is wrong for a person to eat anything that causes someone else to stumble. It is better not to eat meat or drink wine or to do anything else that will cause your brother or sister to fall. So whatever you believe about these things keep between yourself and God. Blessed is the one who does not condemn himself by what he approves. But whoever has doubts is condemned if they eat, because their eating is not from faith; and everything that does not come from faith is sin. We who are strong ought to bear with the failings of the weak and not to please ourselves. Each of us should please our neighbors for their good, to build them up."

And as Jesus said:

"There is nothing from without a man, that entering into him can defile him: but the things which come out of him, those are they that defile the man."

Shrapnel

Article: Children with ADHD have some smaller brain regions, study shows - Same as With All Dopamine-Deficiency Sufferers

Article: Children with ADHD have some smaller brain regions, study shows


As I pointed out once before, this is due to the lack of dopamine.

It is the same with schizophrenia, poverty, pregnancy, depression, anxiety, alzheimer's...

A brain develops and grows by having dopamine available to do the work that is considering, which outputs new considerations, as well as new connections between considerations.

When a brain can't handle incoming information to consider how it, and its own consideration structure can both be True, then parts of the brain's consideration structure will progressively evaluate as False against the incoming information that is considering through the brain, and loss of consideration, caused by the absence of dopamine, will cause the brain to atrophy. The brain region that suffers loss corresponds to where the dopamine-deficiency is first or most affecting the brain, and relates to specific information that the brain is trying to handle.

Since teenagers' brains are experiencing a higher workload than average, they therefore require more dopamine than average to handle that workload. The strain on their dopamine availability is why teenagers are so susceptible to mental stress-related ailments, which are all dopamine-deficiency ailments.


Cocaine, "smart drugs", - anything that notably increases dopamine counters this effect, but increasing adrenaline / noradrenaline agitates stress-states, and undermines a dopamine increase's ability to resolve stress-states. The lack of dopamine is mental stress, and the presence of dopamine is the absence of mental stress, and so fully prevents ailments that enter through the door of mental stress, and branch out from there, from appearing in the first place.

It should be understood that where there is visible signs of brain reduction coinciding with dopaminergic drug-use, the brain reduction is not from the dopaminergism of the drug used, or from being a drug-user, but is caused by the stresses in the person's life that led to the situation where dopaminergic drug-use became an important and positive need for them. And the very biggest root-cause of stress surrounding dopaminergic drug-use, from which a plethora of compounding stresses stem, is drug prohibition, propelled by the sociopathic dogma of institutional medicine. The harms of drug-use stem from institutional medicine's stigmatization of the truth.




Can you imagine how ludicrous it would be if there was an institution and regulation built up around finding out why starving people have low energy, are emaciated, why they have low general health, why the succeed and earn less than non-emaciated people, why they are prone to bad tempers, and why starving people constantly claim to be in pain that isn't substantiated by the observations of the well-fattened practitioners who treat them (and so isn't taken seriously by them)?

And if each expression of their starvation was regarded by institutional medicine as if it were a separate field and independent subject, unrelated to all the rest, with its own terms describing its details, and billions of dollars spent and earned yearly figuring out which patented medication best treats the bad moods caused by starvation, or what non food-based patented medication takes away the feeling of pain from the starvation, while doing nothing to address the root cause of the starvation.

And if there were treatment centres set up to convince starving people to cope and deal with the state of being starving, of accepting a compromised life, while still going to through the motions of working a job, being social (even though "social" doesn't exist in a brain that is lacking in dopamine-availability) - people basically being turned into puppets on sticks, doing what they're told only because they literally don't know better, because their brains lack the dopamine to connect the considerations to know better.

And if there was, at the time time, an extreme coordinated effort between institutional medicine, government, and law enforcement, to make sure that people were specifically unable to access food?


That is exactly the situation that exists today, regarding dopamine-deficiency. The doctors and scientists who carry out this charade are frauds and charlatans, and they, along with the pharmaceutical companies who either know to some extent that they're doing this, or otherwise don't know anything about what they're doing at all, are all guilty of the one of the greatest of all crimes against humanity. Their diagnosis is like practicing the four humours, and their medications that quell symptoms while avoiding the root cause are like chemical lobotomies.

Anything that is not to address the symptoms of dopamine-deficiency ailments, but that does not address the root cause of dopamine-deficiency ailments, which is the lack of dopamine, is not treating the ailment, but is instead treating institutional medicine's sociopathic ideology, and the dopamine-plentiful people who practice it, whose conformity to what is False is responsible for the liquidation the health, lives, comforts, of those who are suffering, and who medicine is supposed to be there to serve first and foremost. Instead, those people have been turned into livestock.



Related posts:

Articles: Study Suggests Genetics Could Be The Root Cause Of Schizophrenia (*big yawn*, I already resolved this)
Articles: Poverty may alter the wiring of kids’ brains / Children from wealthy families grow up as extroverts, earn more in life
Article: 'Methylene Blue' may offer new answers in the fight against Alzheimer's
Dopamine Deficient Signal Routing Causing Affliction in Cases of Autism, OCD, ADD / ADHD...
Article: I told the truth in my sister's obituary, so that others might choose to live (One Way Dopamine Deficiency Can Kill)
Regarding Cocaine's Applicability for Treating Migraines (2nd Addendum)
Articles: Stress could increase the risk of cognitive impairment preceding Alzheimer's & How to help someone with depression
Article: Increased brain connectivity eases teenage impatience


... and many others.



So, if there was to be a question of 'Where were you when the root causes of ADHD, depression, anxiety, psychosis, schizophrenia, PTSD, alzheimer's, parkinson's, bi-polar, and much else, became known?', the answer would be: Right here, reading this blog.

Shrapnel

Articles Concerning a Couple of Other Matters Which I've Already Given the Understanding For

i.

Article: Study finds psychopaths have below-average intelligence

I said this long ago, on this blog, that the industry hype about sociopaths and psychopaths having high intelligence was the opposite of the truth, and a product of those who are making such assessments being of sociopathic disposition, themselves - and that it's because they regard peer-praise and the ability to manipulate situations to their personal benefit so highly, that they consider those things to be the picture of intelligence, to them.

I also said that doctor, and scientist, are two of the foremost professions populated by sociopaths / psychopaths - people who have been raised with a discipline-type which taught them 'this determination is good' vs 'this determination is bad,' putting up many roadblocks to considering within their mind and brains, and resulting in them lots of surplus dopamine to make them very functional, self-confident, and scholastically successful, while ultimately being ineffective for much beyond sucking up to the popular themes of the day, and looking for ways they can fit themselves into granfalloons.

That type of disciplining also conditioned their personalities to perceive the experience of dopamine being freed up within their brains due to concluding the work that is considering (which is the work of a brain for which dopamine is required) as though it were "reward" for fulfilling various determinations, since it replenishes in availability each time they cause the desisting of considering. This disposition renders them very non-appreciative and of the truth concerning the states of malady that come about explicitly because of dopamine-deficiency, and it makes them non-empathetic to the great suffering that their doctrine of fiction is responsible for causing for other people. Their mistaken perception results in them feeling justified in exploiting the dopamine-deficiency-caused states of suffering of others for the sake of their own personal self-gratification, which they justify to themselves as "reward" for conformity to peer-approved ideology.



[Side discussion]

That type of disciplining also conditioned their personalities to perceive the experience of the dopamine that freed up within their brains upon their conforming to a peer-approved determination (which ended some considering, freeing up the dopamine being used for that considering) as though it were "reward" for obeying that peer-approved directive. Of course, the actual state of things is that that perception of their was only a symptom of their enormous stupidity, which itself was a product of their being taught 'this is good' vs 'this is bad,' which prevented their own considering of matters within their mind and brain - which would have developed the consideration structure that is smarts.

That's why there is so much drug-related research that concludes things which is not supported by any of the evidence looked at in the study: The writer A) can't understand any of what they're looking at, and so they default to assuming it means a determination about how the substance is negative for health, because they don't know how to consider, and B) conforming to the peer-approved granfalloon makes them feel good, because it avoids considering, freeing up dopamine that was allocated towards figuring something out when they first looked at the matter.

In effect, people who are "reward"-motivated are all junkies, only looking to acquire their next fix as soon as possible, by way of falsifying whatever they're working on. That's why medical science hasn't moved one inch on the matters of dopamine and mental health in a century, and why I produced both those matters' complete understanding, from start to finish, within one year. The professions of doctor and scientist are filled with junkies who are only there for the high of feeling as though they're conforming to the peer-approved granfalloon, and whose only guidance in what they do is the appearance of propriety and authority of their peers, and who work against people who literally need dopamine to be healthy, well, and productive, just so that those doctor and scientist junkies can get their dopamine fixes by conforming to their peers' opposition of those people's lives.

I tell you the truth: The memory of those who work out of "reward" and to prevent acceptance of the truth of human physiological health will be like that given for Nazi guards who stood outside concentration camps, feeling strong, proud, and justified for upholding the murderous and self-aggrandizing granfalloon of their day. And those who call dopamine "reward" will be like early-USA slave-owners, who rationalized their positions of manipulated circumstance in society by framing Africa-Americans as sub-humans and animals, whose greatest possible semblance of civility and contribution to society was under the ownership and whip of their white owners. Those slave-owners, too, used the very same rationalization as "reward" (their being white vs others being black) to justify to themselves their disposition and ability to self-benefit in society, at the expense of those on the under side of their determination - and at the expense of the truth, itself.

The conforming Nazi guard and slave-owners of yesterday are the same people who call themselves doctors and scientists today, serving their institutions' fictions of ideological and capitalistic preference. The same evil found another form, in doctors and scientists, but it is the same evil.



[Back to the main topic]

I said that a psychopath / sociopath is someone whose mind lacks considerations, which are developed through the act of considering, which is the work of a brain that requires dopamine to accomplish. And so, since sociopaths / psychopaths lack the willingness to do the work that requires dopamine to complete, they end up having a lot of surplus dopamine, which is what produces all cognitive clarity and work-potential for a brain, and so those who have lots of it due to not using it for the work of considering have lots to apply to the few considerations that they do have, and make them very proficient in utilizing the few and basic considerations that they do possess.

In other words, due to their large dopamine availabilities (due to being non-considering, but conforming to determinations), sociopaths are highly functional in a society that has been tailored by sociopaths to benefit sociopaths.

Related post: Things to Consider About Sociopathism




ii.

Article: Could signals from the heart trigger fearful reactions based on racist stereotypes?

Thought originates in a person's heart, as belief, which is a 'This Is' command, which then travels as a signal to a person's brain, and filters through all their considerations, becoming articulated in the process. If able, a person's considerations will reason with the belief as it considers through them. And after having being fully considered, there is output a new meaning, which takes a manifest form, such as an action, the development of a new consideration, etc, and so, by way of Reason, what was considered applies back into the mind which considered it.

Related post: Articles: Study Suggests Genetics Could Be The Root Cause Of Schizophrenia (*big yawn*, I already resolved this) (part iv.)


Regarding this: "Thought originates in a person's heart, as belief, which is a 'This Is' command, which then travels to a person's brain, and filters through all their considerations, becoming articulated in the process."

... this is why Jesus said "The good man brings good things out of the good treasure of his heart, and the evil man brings evil things out of the evil treasure of his heart. For out of the overflow of the heart, the mouth speaks."

And Also: "But the things that come out of a person's mouth come from the heart, and these defile them. For out of the heart come evil thoughts--murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander. These are what defile a person; but eating with unwashed hands does not defile them."

And another excerpt, from Mark, says: "'Are you so dull?' he asked. 'Don't you see that nothing that enters a person from the outside can defile them? For it doesn't go into their heart but into their stomach, and then out of the body.' (In saying this, Jesus declared all foods clean.)

'What comes out of a person is what defiles them. For it is from within, out of a person's heart, that evil thoughts come--sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander, arrogance and folly. All these evils come from inside and defile a person.'"

That same also declares all drugs to be clean.



What does it look like, when a person believes in the truth, and that belief invokes Reason and causes considering? It follows the pattern that electricity makes for itself, as it moves through a medium - like can be seen at 1:15 of this video:

Or, like can be seen in the synaptic connections in a person's brain, which are the manifestation of belief.


And this manifestation that starts with belief, and, because of Reason, goes on to produce the truth of all things, is also what Jesus referred to when saying, "The kingdom of heaven is like a mustard seed, which a man took and planted in his field. Though it is the smallest of all seeds, yet when it grows, it is the largest of garden plants and becomes a tree, so that the birds come and perch in its branches."

And also: "The kingdom of heaven is like yeast that a woman took and mixed into about sixty pounds of flour until it worked all through the dough."

Just as yeast causes dough to rise, so do the considerations that emanate from belief cause a mind to rise up into the greater perception, and joining of the truth.


No study or science was required in producing the full understanding of these matters, but only considering them from the belief that is good, and with a willingness for truth, rather than for self-benefit and conformity to peer-approval for the sake of experiencing "reward."

And conforming to, and making determinations for the sake of experiencing "reward" is only different than a person stealing money (rather than truth) to buy crack cocaine in that the person stealing money to buy a dopaminergic drug to experience a dopamine increase may well have a legitimate dopamine deficiency that those stealing truth for their fix have prevented from being addressed through other means.




iii.

All movement is produced by considering, and a person can only act, or move from one state to another by Reason. To be able to consider, to create movement, a person must first have belief, which creates context between considerations and is a 'This Is' declaration, upon which Reason acts. When a person is unwilling to first have belief, their only other option to progress is by creating false reasons by making determinations, which progressively divide and reduce the connectivity of considerations, which forms their mind and being. A person who does not believe, but who makes determinations to benefit themselves, is continually exhausting their spiritual equity. And the state of no longer having any consideration to be move through is the "outer darkness" that Jesus spoke about. The absence of movement of considerations by being considered through other consideration, is death.

And this is also why this declaration from Jesus is truthful: "And this is eternal life, that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent."

And also: "I am the resurrection and the life. The one who believes in me will live even if he dies, and the one who lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this?"


The only way to know something is to have fully considered it, to have its full being considering through oneself, so that it is known - because everything is its considerations.

To have considered something, a person must first have had the belief which provoked and warranted consideration of it. So, if a person truly believes in the only concept which amounts to all considerations, all evaluating as True, all going into one another, producing the state of All in All, then there is no death within that person, but that person has eternal life inside of themselves, and will not see death, as Jesus said: "Very truly I tell you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life and will not be judged but has crossed over from death to life."

And also: "Anyone who loves me will obey my teaching. My Father will love them, and we will come to them and make our home with them."

Shrapnel

The Third Entry Into "An Eclectic Assortment of Articles, Which All Receive Resolution by Understanding Dopamine"

Related posts:
An Eclectic Assortment of Articles, Which All Receive Resolution by Understanding Dopamine
A Few More for: An Eclectic Assortment of Articles...



i.

Study finds searching for the next word while maintaining a gaze becomes too much for your brain to handle

That is entirely a matter of dopamine-availability: The greater the dopamine-availability, the more synapse-branches a brain is capable to hold in context at one time, and the more concurrent activities it can perform, evaluate, and direct. Increasing dopamine (while restraining adrenaline / noradrenaline) is simply a dial that incrementally turns up the performance-equity of a brain, which consequently has the equal effect on the performance-equity of the entire body.

The shifting of eyes, or focus, and every nervous tick, or changing of behaviour, is the re-allocation and prioritization of dopamine in action.



Levels of a feel-good brain chemical diminish over the years

This is because people are being taught to conform to determinations, and the more determinations a person takes into themselves, the more fractured the information contained within their brain and mind becomes, and the more dopamine becomes required to hold all the disparate branches of determination-imprisoned considerations in functional context. This means reduced capacity for such a brain to handle any work - including the process of making more dopamine. This declining progression is the basis of dementia.

The more determinations a person bases their outlook upon, the more disjointed the information within their brain becomes, the less efficient their brain becomes when trying to work with many considerations that are not harmonized, the more dopamine is required for their brain to conduct that work, the less dopamine is available for their brain to do more work with, including work such as producing more dopamine.



Living near heavy traffic increases risk of dementia, say scientists

This is for the same reason that people born with autism can be very sensitive to sound and other stimuli: because all perceived environmental influences are invoking Reason within a person's brain, causing considerations, which are polar, to process the incoming information by considering it - which depends on the allocation of dopamine. So, the more perceived information incoming, the larger a drain there is on a person's dopamine-availability. But, if there is not enough dopamine available to handle all the commands received by Reason, then the considering processes will tear through a person's brain until the perception of truth in the brain is frayed to the point that the brain can no longer perceive the commands that are causing this - and this is because Reason is immutable and cannot be silenced. So, living in an area filled with many different auditory influences is creating a lot of work for a brain, which reduces the brain's work and performance equity, and over time could be a lot of cumulative stress that leads to dementia, which is a mental stress-emergent ailment. And, as I've said all along, mental stress is insufficient dopamine relative to the amount of work which a brain is trying to handle and accomplish.

I also previously explained autistic sensitivity to environmental stimuli as being due to Reason pulling signals through a brain that lacks the dopamine to properly process those signals in the post Dopamine Deficient Signal Routing Causing Affliction in Cases of Autism, OCD, ADD / ADHD...

And, just as I said before, Managing and Increasing Dopamine Can Easily Add Years to a Person's Life and Good Health.



“Pregnancy brain” means reductions in gray matter for new mothers

Weaving a baby in a mother's womb is the work of considering, and it depends upon dopamine to enable and keep safe all the considering work involved. That increased workload for the mother naturally drains the dopamine that is being allocated towards the mother's own brain, and so, unless a mother keeps her dopamine levels high enough to handle both the baby's development and the mother's, there is a bit of atrophy in the mother's brain. This is the same effect as occurs in people with mental stress ailments, such as poverty, and schizophrenia, as pointed out in the post Study Suggests Genetics Could Be The Root Cause Of Schizophrenia (*big yawn*, I already resolved this).


This is also why I previously said in the post Cocaine Use During Pregnancy Can Prevent Autism (and elsewhere) that one of the very healthiest things a pregnant mother can do for themselves, and to fortify the positive development of their child, is to take pure cocaine while pregnant. Other dopaminergics will not work as well, due to their non-beneficial dopamine-to-adren/noradren ratios, nor will cocaine that is cut with common buffing agents that raise adren/noradren. Cocaine greatly inhibits the uptake of noradrenaline by the heart, which keeps the body and brain calm while proficiently raising dopamine-availability in a brain - which makes cocaine a perfect miracle-cure for mental stress ailments, taken properly.



Researchers Find the Possible Culprit Behind Common Autism Problem

Of course, mental stress is insufficient dopamine relative to the work that a brain is trying to handle. And, I've said since long ago that autism is a mental stress ailment, which is the product of development within a pregnant mother being interrupted due to a lack of dopamine-availability within the pregnant-mother's brain.

By the way, the lack of brain-synapse pruning in babies who are born autistic is simply because there wasn't sufficient dopamine-availability in the pregnant mother's brain to develop their baby to the point of concept-resolution, which is when synapse-pruning takes plthe work of synapse-pruning.

And I've also said that being born with incomplete development leaves the autistic child with a very inefficient-working brain, since considerations that resolve into onesness require only one quantum of dopamine to active and have their entire concept be held as True - but that many branches of considerations, which have not yet resolves into oneness will each require their own own quantum of dopamine to activate all the threads that experience a degree of difference between each other. Each point of non-reconciled difference will require dopamine to temporarily consider the difference between the points to make them able to reason together for any particular task.

So, the state of incomplete development that an autistic person is born with leaves them very dopamine-disadvantaged, and their bodies subjected to stress, and higher levels of stress, much more regularly.



Editing genes to eliminate cancer or Schizophrenia could stop the rise of geniuses, scientist warns

Scientists discover the gene editing 'off-switch' that could protect against accidents or stop it from being used for harm

I've talked about this before (A Gene is a Concept - and a quality), and as I said, genes are an output of considering, which is guided by Reason, following belief. When there is an issue with genes, there is an issue in the considering process that is developing them - such as a lack of dopamine to support the developmental work that is considering. But, as genes are an inter-dependent ecosystem, removing some will modify the behaviour of others, and reduce the overall dimension which the body is capable of navigating, and possibly create confusion and genetic memory-loss. A gene was considered into being (an example of 'the world became flesh'), and is living, and has a hope. Removing one to spare the body is akin to removing a suffering person from life on Earth to make things more comfortable for a certain demographic.

By the way, the lack of brain-synapse pruning in babies who are born autistic is simply because there wasn't sufficient dopamine-availability in the pregnant mother's brain to direct and person the action of synapse-pruning.

Do YOU have the angry gene? Scientists discover why some women are more prone to PMT

It is not an angry gene, but when a gene is assisting with work for which there is insufficient dopamine-availability, or when a gene's contribution to work is causing reduced availability for other processes, it creates stress, which frustrates the work of other processes within the body, and can experience as being expressively-inhibited, causing build-up of energy in places, which turns to discomfort and anger. Increasing dopamine while simultaneously inhibiting adren/noradren during PMT will alleviate PMT.



Cellular reprogramming has been used to reverse ageing in living animals for the first time

You know where cells receive their programming from? Belief-invoked Reason, which causing the considering that, amongst all other things, is what is called evolution.

When a person ingests food or drink, pollutant or drug, that thing that is ingested, as all things, are made of considerations, and the influence they bear on a person of a particular state is a relative to the considerations that material communicates with the considerations within the person that receives it. The particular influence of any thing is not based on a determination, but based on how the receiving body of considerations considers the incoming influence. That is why Jesus said, "And these signs will accompany those who believe: In my name they will drive out demons; they will speak in new tongues; they will pick up snakes with their hands; and when they drink deadly poison, it will not hurt them at all; they will place their hands on sick people, and they will get well."

And, as I've said, the truth is one consideration giving itself to another with neither force nor resistance, creating a friction-free bolt of considering of the truth which is what Jesus refers to when saying "For as the lightning flashes in the east and shines to the west, so it will be when the Son of Man comes." And for this purpose, Isaiah spoke, "Every valley shall be raised up, every mountain and hill made low; the rough ground shall become level, the rugged places a plain. And the glory of the Lord will be revealed, and all people will see it together. For the mouth of the Lord has spoken," referring to the organizing of considerations to create the all-True pathway for the only truthful ordering of all considerations to come like a bolt of lightning and pure energy.

Considering via this knowledge changes matter to pure energy, and makes what is immaterial, material.




ii.

These are all very simple problems, with straight-forward solutions, and like Nikola Tesla said of Thomas Edison, "His method was inefficient in the extreme, for an immense ground had to be covered to get anything at all unless blind chance intervened and, at first, I was almost a sorry witness of his doings, knowing that just a little theory and calculation would have saved him 90 per cent of the labor" ... so it also is regarding institutional medicine and those who practice it, and work on its "science" - simply accepting the truth of dopamine, rather than opposing it, and therefore also the lives and well-being of those who needed it, would have saved "scientists" and "doctors" from a century of fruitlessness, of being only a lackey for a corrupt and evil status-quo, and would have saved many, many millions of lives and people from suffering that is greater than anything those calling themselves "scientists" and "doctors" have ever known.


What I have given is a unified and truthful understanding, such as those touted and searched for regarding physics, but for human physiology - freedom from, and cure and prevention of mental suffering and ailment, and the keys to long and robust physical and mental health. All that’s to wait for now, is for the institutional regime of sociopaths to exhaust their fruitless and victimizing denials, and for them to start engaging with the truth. And the greatest potential credit available to them now concerning their professional practices and aspirations, is that they enter into the knowledge brought into the world through the great and humble Siats who overcame all of their death-dealing practices and doctrine.

Shrapnel

Woot, found the reference (that I had wanted to include in the previous post)!

I wanted to reference this statement I made waaay back (well, like exactly one year) in the previous blog post, but since so many posts on this blog contain the words "belief," "dopamine," and "sociopath," it was a little difficult to find which post this statement was made in, via searching for the terms.

From the post Controlled Dopamine Release's Influence in Sociopathism, and for Health, and referenced once already in the post Managing and Increasing Dopamine Can Easily Add Years to a Person's Life and Good Health, I wrote:

If a person can take control of their belief, they can freely give themselves the same continuous positive experience that Cocaine delivers, which is exactly what some sociopaths and highly active people feel as their regular state and think nothing of it.

So, the above statement covers the larger understanding of what was recognized in the study referenced in the previous post:

Smokers get a rush of dopamine when nicotine from a cigarette enters their body.

It's this chemical reaction that means so many people are addicted to smoking.

But scientists believe there is something else at play - a smoker's belief in the chemical reaction can also change their cravings. 

In a study, researchers have discovered that if smokers don’t think they are getting nicotine, the rush of dopamine never arrives.

The perceptions of the nicotine study also corroborate everything that I've been saying about dopamine, including its identity as not being "reward", but mental-task processing fuel, which is utilized whenever Reason causes a mind to consider, such as when something is less than OK (for example, a craving), and which is increased in availability when a mind resolves considerings related to not being OK, and believes that everything is OK. The difference between "reward" and physio-fuel is perfectly antithetical in the resultant understanding of the importance of dopamine for a human brain, moving it from being of the least consideration and arriving as an after-effect, to one of primary importance that is required at the beginning of all effort, and to prevent mental and physical stress, vulnerability, damage, and failure.

This essentially means that contemporary medicine and drug, as well as drug-crime policies are basically all just backwards, and life-stealing shit, and that those people in professions where they rationalize away people's natural right to dopamine are cruel monsters, and hypocritical fraudsters.

Also, I want to point out that having some study corroborate what I say is not what makes what I say the truth. The opinions, ideology, and dogma of a billion sociopaths will not alter the truth, and any number of people who act out of determination, such as an ideology, will all equally be found to have been False, in the end.

When a paid health worker speaks of "reward" and "addiction", they speak from their ignorance, from their sociopathic wishes, from their desire to experience "reward," and from their prejudice. But when I say that addiction does not exist, that dopamine is physio-fuel, and that employing "addiction" as if it were a truthful concept creates the very harms that are those who use the concept typically attribute to drugs, I speak from the truth, and the truth speaks through me.

And I know the truth of far more than these things. In truth, if I will it, this entire planet will be transformed into a planet of gods, both good and evil. And if I will it, this entire planet will be separated from true knowledge. Because in me are all the keys to true knowledge, and I make them known as I reason is good.

And just as when asked "Who do you think you are?" by the day's religious professionals in reaction to claiming to know God, Jesus responded, "If I were to say that I do not know him, I would be a liar like you," so it is with what I have said.

Shrapnel

Articles: 'Belief concerning nicotine drives behaviour and dopamine availability' & The Experience of Considering

i.

Here are a few articles, which all are about the same study:

Belief in nicotine's powers can increase addiction

Belief about nicotine content in cigarettes can curb cravings

Level Of Smoking Addiction Determined By Smoker’s Perception Of Nicotine


Excerpt from the first article:

Smokers get a rush of dopamine when nicotine from a cigarette enters their body.

It's this chemical reaction that means so many people are addicted to smoking.

But scientists believe there is something else at play - a smoker's belief in the chemical reaction can also change their cravings. 

In a study, researchers have discovered that if smokers don’t think they are getting nicotine, the rush of dopamine never arrives.


Except from the second article:

The smokers who got the nicotine, or simply believed they did, reported reduced cravings and the scan recorded increased neural activity. 

'When they believed there is nicotine and they had nicotine, the craving correlated with these anterior insula activations — but when they did not believe so, that correlation was gone." Gu said.

"Even when they had nicotine, but did not believe there was nicotine, their brain did not respond [with higher neural activity] and they still reported as much craving as before," she said.

"Basically, you have nicotine and your brain is kind of on, but the twist here is you have to have nicotine, but also believe you have nicotine for the brain to be on," she said.

"So in other words, if you have nicotine, but did not think so — you thought you had some kind of placebo — then your brain is still off," Gu said.

While the biological pull of nicotine plays a key role in the addiction, a person's belief system can also exert a pharmacological effect, she said.

Researchers hope the study, recently published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, will tell them more about the mechanism of addiction.

"It looks like addiction is not just about the substance itself, but also the belief you need the substance to have a normal daily life," Gu said.

She said the study shows why cognitive therapy is so important in changing a smoker's beliefs.



ii.

The conclusion of this study claims to have discovered something which I've already explained in much greater detail.

Recently, in the post Article: "this is how social media affects your brain", I said:

It will be no different if a person considers pouring hot-sauce in their belly-button, or any other inane activity: Whatever a person believes in which consider within their brain, to make their person's well-being status as OK only evaluate as True when the concept that is their belief is fulfilled, which will always free up dopamine, since those considerings, conscious and sub forefront-conscious, will be resolved once their reasons are fulfilled, and considering is the work of a brain, and the work that requires dopamine to connect pieces of information in new ways.


And in the post Overview of Why Placebo Works, and Isn't Really Placebo After All, I said:

- The mechanisms of the metabolic pathway can be triggered in two ways: by decomposition of a molecule (which itself has a frequency that carries its meaning as a signal and equates to a ‘This Is’ declaration upon whatever it contacts), or by a reasoned thought-signal that contains the same declarative information


I also talked on the same theme in the post The Placebo Effect is Belief Freeing Up Dopamine to Help Healing Consider



iii.

I wish it wouldn't be said in the news articles about this study'd finding that "scientists believe there is something else at play," or that science would be mentioned at all, since the greatest understanding of these things comes from me, and I did not use any science to come to know them, or read any similar understanding from any scientist's work before I spoke these things from my own knowing. In fact, when I spoke them, it was in complete opposition to and rejection of everything I'd ever heard said from the perspectives of those calling themselves scientists. I knew the truth because of Reason, and I spoke it because it is the truth. To indicate science in this is to hijack some of the full understanding's considerations, and align them in ways which spoil the image of truth of the matter.


No science was needed to know, with certainty, that this happens, because its understanding is simply inherent in the knowledge that dopamine is a brain's work potential, and that considering is a brain's work for which dopamine is required, that considering is a streaming of considerations, that a consideration is polar, that a mind is all-factoring and inter-dependent, and that belief is a 'This Is' command upon which Reason immutably acts.

There is no test, observation, research, studying, institutions, regulations needed to know even the greatest of truths. There is simply belief, considering, knowing.



iv.

As Tesla said, “My brain is only a receiver, in the Universe there is a core from which we obtain knowledge, strength and inspiration. I have not penetrated into the secrets of this core, but I know that it exists.”

Well, what is received is a streaming of considerations, which is considering. And what enables considering is belief, which is a 'This Is' command, upon which Reason acts. But an environment that is heavily falsified, such as the mind of a scientist, cannot very easily consider, because the environment of considerations which is their mind evaluates as False against all realty, because of their determinations, and so cannot produce a truthful 'This is' command, to initiate considering. But if they could, then considering is similar to this scene in Transformers.

However, in that scene, the character who information is considering through is being raped by another force, and is not in control - which, by the way, is what doctors do to synapses in people's brains whom they impose their False institutional doctrine concerning dopamine, drug-use, upon. And that is a major part of what is happening in a psychosis, which, like many other things, is only caused by a lack of dopamine to connect information to stop the broken considering processes from forcefully pushing information through synapses not in sync with all other information. And this is also what is happening in the case of autistic children being sensitive to sounds, light etc. Unfortunately, licensed medicines are, relative to cocaine, complete garbage and poison when it comes to being effective at helping against these things, because of their far worse dopamine / adrenergic effect ratios, with the adrenergic effect increasing the workload of a brain, while dopamine increases the capacity for a brain to handle larger workloads.


Considering with reasoning is also like this scene from The Fifth Element, where the character learns via watching progressive scenes on a subject, reasoning their collective meaning as the scenes progress.

With considering, and reasoning while considering, the scenes are the reasoned meaning of all known considerations, and they can consider at even millions of times the rate of those which the Fifth Element character is watching in the given clip. And the individual scenes are made of great expanses of considerations, connecting across many dimensions. And the considered scenes themselves can even be living, with their contents being living experiences of the considerations which make them.

Einstein engaged a basic level of this when he thought in pictures, and came up with his theory of relativity. But neither Einstein, nor Tesla, though they engaged considering at basic levels, knew the greater reality of these things. They neither identified the movement and interaction of considerations as a knowledge to grow, and only focused on producing works in their fields via their individual abilities as they were without any recognition for what the difference was between their minds and other people's.

But, Jesus had already spoken the same as Tesla's "My brain is only a receiver" comment, when saying "By myself I can do nothing; I judge only as I hear, and my judgment is just, for I seek not to please myself but him who sent me." And considering grows into forms far greater and more magnificent than either of these examples, or the capabilities Tesla and Einstein possessed.



v.

While Tesla was fascinated by what the small could be made to do, and worked upon the small with a separation between it and himself, I know the full resolution, Reason, which gives the small its meaning and purpose, and by knowing Reason, I also know all the considerations which resolve into it, not as an outsider, but as an equal, and as one mind, with the shared sight of all who are in Reason. These considerations not only reveal the truth about what is, but they also are what is.

If I'm willing, I can write what resolves everything that all those working in the field of physics seek, and far greater, in a single post. But, as of now, I am not resolved to do this.

A truthful person and a sociopath speak from different devices. A truthful person only speaks what has already been fully considered, and which is already true and reason. A falsehood-bearing person makes determinations about what is, and speaks their determinations without knowing anything. In the truthful person, the truth is their leading considering, and their self is placed last. In the falsehood-bearing person, their own self is their leading consideration, and the truth is placed last. By determining ones self ahead of the truth, the possibility for the truth to present is falsified.

What good is all the information in the universe if it is achieved by determination, and so is outside of you, and therefore you and that information as one is not the truth? The movement of considerations evaluating True into one another is life, and as Jesus said, "Truly, I tell all of you emphatically, if anyone keeps my word, he will never see death," and also, "What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

Making determinations reduces connectivity between considerations. If everything a person has is by making determinations upon what they perceive as being outside of themselves, then there is little connection between the determiner, and all the things that they imposed determinations upon. So how will a person be able to consider through those things so that their life will continue? They will be vulnerable to the "outer darkness" that Jesus spoke of, and these words: "But God said to him, 'You fool! This very night your life will be demanded from you. Then who will get what you have prepared for yourself? This is how it will be with whoever stores up things for themselves but is not rich toward God."

So, what if all that a person has aligned themselves to is a granfalloon? That granfalloon as a whole does not consider into the truth.



vi.

Now, back to the articles about nicotine cravings being subdued by a belief which resolving anxious considering thereby freeing up dopamine-availability, thereby increasing a person's well-being and functionality.

At the end of the CBC article, this is printed:

Researchers hope the study, recently published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, will tell them more about the mechanism of addiction.

"It looks like addiction is not just about the substance itself, but also the belief you need the substance to have a normal daily life," Gu said.


A tremendous fallacy in these statements is the use of the term "addiction," which shows that the mind speaking such is carrying determinations which are causing their considering to collapse into falsehood.

Inherent within the term of addiction are considerations which speak that a person has no control, that a person is not acting by controlled choice, and that a person's behaviour is not acceptable. If a person accepts the term of addiction as True, then Reason will cause the considerations within their own mind, which form those messages, to align in a manner which is against their own personal strength and ability to overcome. Addiction doesn't exist in the truth, but is an imposition which sociopaths place upon others in order to dominate and exploit those people. By accepting the idea of addiction, a person is choosing to allow  be dominated by its concepts.

Accepting the message of addiction is the same as accepting the message of "you can't," which doesn't allow considerations to pass, which makes it impossible for a person to overcome. And this is the great deceit, theft, and treachery behind Alcoholics Anonymous, as well as government and institutional anti-drug messaging, which has been cultivating non-confident drug usage, which is the cause of all the problems which those in government and institutional medicine continue to try to attribute to drugs.


I spoke the following, in the post: Adendum - Migraines are Dopamine Deficiency - and also: The Importance of Tact in Dopaminergic Application - and also: The Importance of Considering the Truth

(I've also now added a link to the above, in this blog's previous post: Article: "Percocet Ruins Lives", But It Saved This Woman's)

Considerations have polarity, and receive their identity as relative to one another. And such a belief aligns certain considerations in a negative manner, and for as long as it evaluates as True towards the activity a person is engaging in, all signals relating to that activity will pass through that consideration, and receive an antagonistic influence, a quantum of negative consideration-value, which can infect the whole mind. And increasing adrenaline and noradrenaline will accelerate the considering of those things that are worries, and progressively amplify the presence of negative consideration-value in the brain until a time when things settle down and they can be reconsidered into normalcy. This is where drug-induced anxiety and psychosis come from - there is nothing inherent in the drugs taken themselves that cause thes)e things, but it is a contagion created by doctors, scientists, and government, out of their sociopathic inclinations to attempt to justify their own statuses by demeaning and harming those of others, who they deem as targets for their prejudice.
...
Also, ironically, when anti-drug propaganda is being administered to a society, there is a growth in sociopathism within that society, and a reduction in intelligence within that society, and the harms put into children and teenagers are those very ones which anti-drug propaganda would have them think come from drugs: Considering is the mechanism behind evolution, and a brain develops its connections through the course of considering. Those connections themselves represent the considerations of a person's mind, and greater Truth is manifest the more considerations are accounted for within an environment - and considerations which resolve into one form concepts. A determination is like a road-block that prevents considering from occurring - and the more determinations held in a mind, the less presence of truth there is in that mind, and the more selfish and sociopathic it is likely to be.



And just as I said in this post:

The considerations that are being held in the concept of science have their truthful placements elsewhere, and science must be discarded so that the truth may appear.

And as I spoke similarly concerning memories, in this post, it is the same regarding harmful drug-usage habits, where the imposed determination of "addiction" has forced the alignment of its involved considerations, in a case of 'if one then not the other', to dominate, subjugate, and exploit a person:

A person cannot overcome the traits of addiction while accepting the notion of addiction as a truth. It is a ball-and-chain that keeps people in the state of dependence upon the directives of sociopaths outside of themselves. People use drugs because they are addicted in the same sense that black people run fast because they have lots of practice from needing to get away after stealing something. Use of the denigrating term addiction is about maintaining a barrier that prevents the truth from being considered, and the upending of a long reign of sociopathic dominance over those people who are most vulnerable in society due to their low dopamine-availability, which is largely due to their considering the words of sociopaths imposed upon them as True in the first place.

Therefore, the first step to overcome any harmful drug-usage is to first believe and know that it is OK to use drugs, and that it always was. Drugs were never the problem, but harmful messaging coming from doctors, government, and scientists, rather than truthful consideration of the matter of drugs, is what really caused people to experience harms from drugs.

The symptoms of addiction cannot exist in a person unless a person first believes in the concept of addiction, and that it applies to them. And the concept of addiction did not arise because it was truth, but because sociopaths wanted a label to impose upon people other than themselves, to dominate and put them beneath themselves.



But the basis for people seeking dopamine-increasing drugs is simply that they are deficient in dopamine-availability, and therefore the solution is to increase their dopamine availability. Even where the solution is to overcome beliefs which are causing worried considering, which is diminishing their dopamine-availability, the solution is still to increase their dopamine-availability. And a person cannot overcome harmful beliefs without first having sufficient dopamine-availability to do the work of reconsidering, and therefore increasing dopamine-availability to give a brain enough physio-fuel for that work comes first.

And much of what causes diminished dopamine-availability within people who use drugs is the impression imposed upon them that there's something wrong with what they're doing. But everyone's brain runs on the effect of cocaine, and cannot perform any work without enough of it being there first.

Also, sociopaths only have lots of dopamine-availability because they have made determinations to obstruct consideration of the truth, reducing the amount of work which their brains are attempting, while means having ample dopamine-availability.

So, there very first harmful belief for a person who suffers dopamine-deficiency (which is all that "addiction" really is) to overcome, is the notion of addiction being anything other than a falsehood which keeps a person imprisoned. Without that, nothing further can be done. So, the first step to overcoming harmful drug habits is for a person to accept that it is OK to use drugs.

Related posts:

How Belief Affects Mental Stress Treatment, and the Effect that Anti-Drug Propaganda Has on Mental Health
A Simple Truth About "Addiction" Drug Use, and Trauma
Further Information on "Addiction" and Drug-Associated Health Issues, and the Environment that Produces them
Article: "Percocet Ruins Lives", But It Saved This Woman's
Woot, found the reference (that I had wanted to include in the previous post)!

Shrapnel