Subject Re-Summarization and Article Dump + Beware of Abstraction-based Doctrine

Cocaine study that got up the nose of the US
Nixon official: real reason for the drug war was to criminalize black people and hippies
It's not just stem cell research that's overhyped— medical science spin is a widespread problem
Everything You've Heard About Crack And Meth Is Wrong
Hyperbole Hurts: The Surprising Truth About Methamphetamine
Why the Myth of the Meth-Damaged Brain May Hinder Recovery
Methamphetamine: Fact vs. Fiction And Lessons From The Crack Hysteria
7 Facts About Drugs and Addiction That Will Make You Question Everything You Know
The Rational Choices of Crack Addicts
Mice Fed with Cocaine Show Growth in Brain Areas Linked with Learning, Memory
Cocaine enhances memory storage in mice
Cocaine self-administration improves performance in a highly demanding water maze task


The relative dangers of drugs: What the science says

If all other things are equal, a person who drinks alcohol is doing more damage to their health and at greater risk of developing habitual usage than users of any other drug. That should put warnings about other drugs into perspective, along with the trust-worthiness of the researchers and institutions issuing warnings about drugs, rather than safe-usage information. And when institutions and researchers refuse to supply harm-reduction and safe-usage information out of ideological belief, they are making the statement that they would rather see people dead then using drugs safely. Such people have the will for murder of whoever doesn't agree with them in their hearts.


A person whose motivation is self-reward rather than the truth has made a determination to falsify an environment of considerations to make reason for their action, and is acting sociopathically. Also, the belief in reward as motivation conditions a brain to be psychopathic. The human brain does not run on reward, and the reward philosophy in contemporary behavioural studies is a false doctrine. The human brain uses dopamine to connect information across synapses, and to process information to resolution. Cocaine's enjoyable effect in the increase of dopamine in a person's brain.

Those who speak of "reward" in substance-related studies are identifying themselves as junkies, since they have called dopamine reward, and call reward as their motivation. But dopamine is not what comes at the end, but is what has to be there are the start, so that effort and potential can exist. And when work is resolved, dopamine is returned to availability. But without dopamine being there in the first place, there is no potential for work.


How come people who drink 5 glasses of water a day, or who eat 3 meals a day aren't called addicted, and their addictions to drinking water and eating food studied, while those addicts are themselves persecuted for their addictions?

If dopamine were addictive, then every human alive would already be addicted, since they are born with their brain experiencing and running on the same effect as cocaine - and then addiction would be an inconsequential or even a very good thing, because it would precisely be due to having that addiction that humans exist and live.

If a person is constantly seeking to increase their dopamine, then it is likely that they are lacking dopamine to begin with - as is the case with mental stress-based ailments such as depression, anxiety, psychosis, ADHD, schizophrenia. Even simple fatigue is an expression of a state of dopamine availability within a person's brain.

"Addiction" is an ignorant term, on par with racist epithets that were also once taken to represent sentiments presumed by many to represent truths. The term addiction does nothing to accurately convey what a situation is, and makes to effort to explain itself. It is a cop-out, and an excuse to write a conclusion for research when the researcher has no understanding of what their research actually shows.

Also, the human brain is a drug bath. So, if drugs killed, an impression that a lot of research aims to push, then everybody would be dead. Unfortunately, a lot of researchers experience "reward" from propping up dogmatic ideology-based drug attitudes, which has turned medical substance research into an industry of propaganda, ignorance, and the confirmation bias of people who want attention and money for completing research, but can't figure how to turn their observations into conclusions. Studies that base their understanding in abstractions, such as "addiction", and "reward", are not focused on reality.

Things haven't changed all that much since Reefer Madness.




The modern recycling of the same and additional lies have simply been inlaid into more technical presentations, and naively parroted and argued by people who want attention and money for completing research, but can't figure how to turn their observations into conclusions - and also whose truth has always been conformity to the appearance of authority, and who have difficulty allowing themselves to consider the possibility that if they didn't just accept on faith that the drug ideology tropes they evaluated their own moral righteousness by simply were, that they suddenly find that they don't know what to do or write. Even what is already dead can experience fear of death as it turns to cross over into life.

Shrapnel

How Belief Affects Mental Stress Treatment, and the Effect that Anti-Drug Propaganda Has on Mental Health

i.

One of the most important things for a person who want to treat their mental stress ailment with cocaine, or similar, is that they believe that doing so is perfectly OK, and good to do.
As I've said many times, a consideration is polar. And it is because considerations are polar that Meaning exists. And so, whenever a person engages consideration, they're being led forward.
But when a person moves by determination, they don't progress in the truth.

So, if a person holds a negative belief inside of themselves, a belief being a declaration of 'This Is' to their mind, to which Reason then applies, then that person has False, and hostile-to-truth things considering in their mind, and they accumulate negative consideration value, which reacts in anti-polar fashion to what is good.

And if a person holds a negative and non-accepting belief concerning the action they engage in, then their own choices and lingering actions against their own acceptance of what is allowed causes a judgement against their own actions to evaluate True within their mind, substantiated by their own considerations as aligned according to their deeper belief, and causing their own considerations to turn in their polarity, against them. And they may accrue guilt, and feelings of non-acceptance by what is right, whatever their belief of what is right may be.

If a person continues to engage in what they have believed is wrong, then the amount of consideration which judged them grows, and the amount of consideration which they feel safe within lessens. And this is the cause of all drug-induced psychosis, as I mentioned in this previous blog post: Where Does A "Drug-Induced" Psychosis Really Come From?

If a person had no doubts concerning their choice and activity, then there could be nothing to cause an increase of worry, panic, and fear, within them.

But even if a person doesn't feel right using cocaine, or increasing their dopamine to cure their ailment, this is still the truth: The human brain runs on the effect of cocaine, and all mental stress ailment is only caused by there being insufficient availability of the effect of cocaine within their brain, relative to the amount of work that their brain is engaged with.


ii. 

But where has this highly-detrimental belief within society, concerning the very thing the human brain runs on and engagement of what truthfully prevents mental stress and cures a person of their mental stress states, come from?

Those things have been painstakingly cultivated by governments, by institutional medicine, by scientists, and by doctors and specialists. And when a government has run a sentiment-based fear campaign against drugs, there has always been a large increase in negative influence in society, an increase of vulnerability to issues which cannot be caused by drugs alone, but only if a person has been convinced that the action they engage in anyway is wrongful. All the same mental health issues would ensue if a person, or people were convinced that drinking water made them wrong and unaccepted, yet they drank anyway because they needed to, and their own body informed them of it.

Yet, in the case of anti-drug propaganda, the thing which people in society have been brainwashed to feel uncertain about is the very cure for the mental stress states that arise from having a doubting and uncertain mind. Government, scientists, and doctors, have made people fear their own state of becoming and being healthy, the basic state of being human.

So, if a person wants to be healed of their affliction, it is important that they first understand, and believe within themselves, that taking drugs, and especially cocaine, is perfectly OK, and good for their health. Its effect is what their body was designed by nature to run on, and literally needs to overcome, to develop, and to heal.

And, as I’ve said previously, it will come to be understood that all the harms associated with drug use were caused only by the determined opposition to them by institutional medicine and those who practice it. But drugs on their own do not cause these things, and any activity that a person is uncertain about, but does anyway, will equally be a threat to their mental well-being.

iii.

The apostle Paul spoke from this understanding when he said "For instance, one person believes it's all right to eat anything. But another believer with a sensitive conscience will eat only vegetables."

And again, Paul spoke from this understanding when he said, "'Everything is permissible,' but not everything is beneficial. 'Everything is permissible,' but not everything is edifying."

And when government, scientists, and doctors disseminated falsehoods and insisted determinations upon people in society concerning what drug use is, they were those Jesus spoke of in this parable:

"The kingdom of heaven is like a man who sowed good seed in his field. But while everyone was sleeping, his enemy came and sowed weeds among the wheat, and went away.

When the wheat sprouted and formed heads, then the weeds also appeared. "The owner's servants came to him and said, 'Sir, didn't you sow good seed in your field? Where then did the weeds come from?' "'An enemy did this,' he replied. "The servants asked him, 'Do you want us to go and pull them up?' "'No,' he answered, 'because while you are pulling the weeds, you may uproot the wheat with them. Let both grow together until the harvest. At that time I will tell the harvesters: First collect the weeds and tie them in bundles to be burned; then gather the wheat and bring it into my barn.'"

The seeds of the enemy are the determinations of government, scientists, and doctors, made for the purpose of creating self-benefiting leverage in society, enforcing their ideology, giving their prejudice a target, and providing themselves with a sense of "reward."

Those determinations have produced much harmful considering in many of the most vulnerable people in society, and the mental stress ailments in society today are the weeds grown from the harmful considering that sprouted from the seeds of institutional and government-run medicine.

And the produced consideration that deepens the articulation and fine perception of a mind, allowing a person to finally understand this situation, is the fruit of the good seed, which was to be protected while the weeds were let to grow alongside. And now is the time to gather the weeds into bundles to be burned, so that only what is good may remain standing.

iv.

The false, determination-based and sentiment-driven philosophy that doctors, scientists and government rely on for dissemination their objectives concerning drug-use in society, when accepted as True by people, leads a person's consideration into all the harms which have been falsely attributed to drug-use that can be witnessed in society today, because that philosophy is not born of the consideration that brings the truth.

And as Jesus warned those he taught the truth to, to "Watch out and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees." The leaven, which causes dough to rise, is the considering caused by an accepted belief. When what has become accepted as True is bad, so is what rises from it. The same warning applies today, regarding the leaven of doctors, scientists, and government, which causes mental stress ailment, inequality, prejudice, and much suffering to rise within society.

As Jesus said, "A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit." And also, "Make a tree good and its fruit will be good, or make a tree bad and its fruit will be bad, for a tree is recognized by its fruit."

The tree Jesus spoke of is the structure of consideration which forms by a person's belief. It grows, and has branches, just like the neural network in a person's brain grown and develops branches according to a person's belief, because belief is a declaration of 'This Is', to which Reason then applies, causing considering, which is the source of all development, including human evolution.

What is the judgment of a tree which has not produced understanding and good results for the last 100 years (the very same length of time since cocaine became restricted from medical use), and the fruit of which has been the continuation, and entrenching of mental stress ailments in society?

As Jesus said, "Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire." And so it is time to cut down the False-bearing tree of institutional medicine.

v.

As the apostle Paul also said, "Those who feel free to eat anything must not look down on those who don't. And those who don't eat certain foods must not condemn those who do, for God has accepted them."

The same must apply, and does, regarding those who choose to use drugs, and those that don't: That they must not be ostracized by society for their choices concerning what they put into their own bodies in accordance with their belief, and they must not ostracize others for their choices concerning what they put into their own bodies in accordance with their own belief.

And there must not be efforts to manipulate the outcomes of any such use by those who choose to engage it.

Related post: A Few More for: An Eclectic Assortment of Articles

Shrapnel

Where Does A "Drug-Induced" Psychosis Really Come From?

i.

A consideration is polar and directional, and everything is contributing towards a movement. The static state of observation which those who call themselves scientists and doctors believe in doesn't exist in the truth, and it is only their lack of connectivity to the truth, and their fear of the truth, that they rest all their sense of safety upon that false concept. Observation is guilt by choice of inaction towards doing what is good, and serving of the truth.


ii.

While it's considered that using some psycho-active drug may cause psychosis, anxiety and psychosis cannot occur if a person is of sound mind regarding their actions and experience. A person's uncertainty is a concept, made of considerations, which evaluate True as a "This is" command within their mind, so long as they participate in whatever they are uncertain about. The "This is" produces considering, and other considerations progressively consider through that concept, and receive its influence imparted upon their own values. This can cause a mind to progressively divide itself, and produce anxiousness, and also lead to psychosis.

Therefore, drugs do not cause psychosis, but how a person considers their actions can divide their mind. So, who is responsible for predisposing, through decades-long concerted manipulation, the public's considering towards worry, anxiousness, fear, and guilt, regarding the consumption of criminalized and non-prescribed drugs?


iii.

When it comes to "drug-induced" psychoses, the situation is as if a government were to put an electronic bracelet around a people's legs that is capable of exerting great pressure, and will automatically crush and break the leg of a person if ever their two feet come off the ground at once.

And so, when the person jumps, for whatever reason, the bracelet which their government placed around their leg crushes their leg, and then their government says "see, we told you jumping was bad, because it causes your leg to break - this is why we need to have strict rules against jumping". But, of course, there never was anything about jumping that cause the leg to break, and it was completely the government's intervention of putting that bracelet around people's legs that was designed to crush their legs, which caused the person's leg to break, which the government then used to justify having a no-jumping policy, and having leg-crushing bracelets to enforce that policy.

The reality is that the bracelet is an artificial imposition, designed to create an impression for its own necessitation, and removing it will free a person and resolve the real source of threat.

So it is with anti-drug propaganda, which has been brain-washing to force the outcome which is used to push drug enforcement: Drug-induced psychoses are not actually drug-induced, but are actually anti-drug propaganda-spouting doctor, scientist, police and government-induced. And then those people use the product of their own false determinations as justification for continuing their falsehoods.


iv.

It is not within a drug's power to choose which way a mind is going to consider something. But the propaganda disseminated in anti-drug efforts has forcefully sought to lead consideration surrounding drugs in a negative direction - and it is that negatively-considering direction, accelerated by increases in adrenaline, which causes harms such as anxiety and psychosis.

But no matter how much effort is made to convince people to be of less-than-sound mind towards drug use, at the end of the day, the human brain still runs on drugs, particularly the effect of cocaine. And so, the effect of cocaine, applied knowingly, continues non-waveringly to be panacea for all mental stress states. And sociopaths who have been comprehensively in denial of reality for many decades will not make that change by their forceful determinations, contrived research, dissemination of misinformation, and threats.


v.

Every consideration traces back to where it came from. I said before that it will become seen that all the greatest harms surrounding drugs were created by those who oppose them. And so it will be.

When one person causes another, by way of a forceful determination, to pre-emptively accept something as harmful apart from all consideration of it, Reason still applies to that determination within the mind of the person who accepts it as True, and then the people who forced that determination upon others become responsible for the negative consideration that ensues in the person who accepted it.

The negative consideration-value in society due to anti-drug propaganda and drug criminalization is tremendous, and is the cause of virtually all mental health issues relating to drug use, and much of which is not directly produced by drug use. At the end of all things, doctors, scientists, governments, police, will all be held responsible for that tremendous negative consideration-value, and all the harms it has caused people.



Related post:  How Belief Affects Mental Stress Treatment, and the Effect that Anti-Drug Propaganda Has on Mental Health

Shrapnel

Dopamine Deficient Signal Routing Causing Affliction in Cases of Autism, OCD, ADD / ADHD...

This image is regarding a common behaviour of an autistic person:

With some of these things, and also with some cases of "OCD", the person is trying to alleviate strain within their brain by associating a personal meaning with those items, which references considerations within their brain, and by moving the items in the world, it helps navigate and order them within their brain. The person doing this does not necessarily recognize the behaviour as guiding signals within their brain, but rather feel that things just need to be a certain way. The ordering of the items in the above picture is the person ordering the considerations within their brain in the manner that feels right, and which alleviates suffering. Similarly, if a person harms their creations made while they pay attention, it can cause signals to rip through their brain, and inflict pain upon the person which they don't know how to express.

All this can also play a part in "OCD", but other cases of "OCD" are different expressions of dopamine-deficiency, where their mind is caught in a loop regarding a thing, because there isn't the dopamine for it to make the connection to advanced information to lift the signal routing out of that loop.

The difference is that in one instance, the signal is still trying to move towards its proper destination, but with great difficulty without having the sufficient dopamine to make the journey, and this causes a great exhaustion and strain within the brain. In the other instance, a signal routing is not really connected to its originally-intended destination anymore, and is looping in a manner that dictates a person's actions.

Also, when it works for a non-autistic person to calm their mind by going for a walk, or a drive, or by watching ASMR videos, they are also similarly assisting signal-navigation within their brain, while also manipulating dopamine levels. These things can all also be achieved by increasing dopamine availability within the person's brain by taking some cocaine.



In other situations, there is a lack of dopamine to regulate a signal properly at synapses, but the signal is still being pulled along its path routing with great force, as the signal is synced to many other signals, which create a value to its force which overpowers the resistance it experiences at synapses - and this is what is behind sensitivity to audio and other senses, a suffering that is associated with Autism, which is being demonstrated in this video, though which can occur without autism being involved.

And at other times, a signal for which there isn't sufficient dopamine to keep it connected with its parental signal processes can be dropped, and this is what is the cause of ADD / ADHD.



All of these states are explicitly due to insufficient released dopamine in the person's prefrontal cortex, and all of these states are successfully alleviated by increasing the available dopamine within a person's prefrontal cortex. But allowing adrenaline / noradrenaline to increase alongside dopamine will exacerbate the afflicting states within areas of the brain, and could lead to further pain, or anxiety, and psychosis (things which are also product of insufficient released dopamine within a person's brain relative to the work that it's trying to perform). This is why cocaine is the ideal and truth-based solution to mental stress states, while licensed medications regularly do more harm than good, and ultimately are not real, compassionate, or healthy treatments.

Autism is caused by a developmental interruption, most likely cause by dopamine deficiency of the mother during their pregnancy, and the non-completed state of development it leaves a person's brain in results in their brain handling tasks very non-efficiently, which is consequently cumbersome on that person's brain's dopamine availability. And the suffering from the person who has autism is their lack of dopamine to properly handle the work their brain is trying to do.



Leaving these people in their dopamine deficient states is inhumane torture, the likes of which the typical doctor has no experience to reference, to be capable of making a sound, judicious judgement regarding. People need to stop listening to doctors and government to address their mental health, because those people are neither interested nor qualified to do anything for these things, and all of their training has been to divert public away from the truth about mental stress / dopamine deficiency ailment, all their medications are designed to capitalize monetarily on the existence of mental stress states, and not to resolve them. And to prevent autism in child-birth, it could be wise for a pregnant mother to occasionally take medium, or even large amounts of cocaine in relaxed settings during their pregnancy - and doing so will fortify the healthy development of their child.

This is the truth, and it stands in marked contrast with what institutional medicine tells people, because institutional medicine is a doctrine create by and for sociopaths, and is not the truth. Doctors are those who carry out the institutional medicine's genocidal doctrine, and tell themselves that they are good for doing so, so that they can experience "reward" inside of themselves: a bit of crack cocaine as their payment for betraying innocent human life.


By the way, in the case of an autistic person, who moves physical things to guide the considerations within their brain, it is just as Jesus explained when he said "I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven". All things are made of considerations, and what a person sees is manifestation of considerations - and to move one is to move the other: to move what is manifest of consideration moves the consideration; to move the consideration is to move what is manifestation of the consideration. This applies to all reality.

Shrapnel

Article: I told the truth in my sister's obituary, so that others might choose to live (One Way Dopamine Deficiency Can Kill)

I told the truth in my sister's obituary, so that others might choose to live

i.

To be honest, it wasn't depression that lied to this girl and caused her death, but it was doctors, scientists, and government who lied to her and caused her death. Her death, and the state which provoked it, was entirely preventable, in full, simply by sufficiently increasing the released dopamine within her brain to the level that the work her brain was trying to perform required, while simultaneously inhibiting adren/noradren. She is one of hundreds of millions who have been killed by the falsehoods which doctors, scientists, and government have created, and which they base their conduct upon. The truth would have saved all of their lives.



ii.

From the article:

"I felt like I was in a vacuum in the middle of space with everything I knew being pulled away from me."

This refers to the sister of the girl who endured depression, and not to the depressed girl herself, but it is a bit of the same experience the depressed girl may have felt. Once the sister was faced with a worrying situation, with many things to be considered, the strain on her dopamine availability would have skyrocketed. Her brain would become clogged up with unfinished processes as there would become less and less dopamine to connect considerations with, to produce sense of meaning, purpose, knowing, control, and future sight.

Similarly, as her sister continued on in her dopamine deficiency-induced depressive state, every one of her considerations, represented as synaptic connections within her brain, experienced meaningless when it could not connect to others. And when they all questioned 'Why', they could hear no answer. And the culmination of their loss of hope for life resulted in her own death.

iii.

Also from the article:

"After what seemed like an eternity, the police officers told me plainly: "Aletha is dead." What followed that stark statement was a sudden moment of lucidity in which only one thing mattered: the truth."

The truth is the only thing that mattered before, and knowing it would have seen her never be at risk succumbing to depression. Depression is an artificial and contrived ailment, created by obstructing access to sufficient dopamine within a person's brain.

Dopamine provides the difference between a person's considerations working upwards or falling downwards; between them increasing in inter-connectivity that strengthens a sense of support, and them losing association and all their qualities of hope and meaning dissipating; between a mind growing in clear-lit sightedness, or fading into darkness.

This girl died because nobody let her engage the truth of her brain. It is as if everyone were to tell a person that water was bad for them, that it would kill them, and that they should just ignore the symptoms of dehydration - and so they do, and then they suffer in perpetual agony until they die. Though dehydration would leave them only suffering for weeks until they died, whereas dopamine deficiency would keep a person suffering for years, and suffering every bit just as intensely, and with the possibility for lot more.

iv.

Again, from the article:

"Depression stole decades of our lives together. Depression lies. I have to tell the truth."

No, depression tells the truth. All those things the article says that she thought she was hearing from her depression, they were the considerations which institutional medical doctrine delivered to her, and her brain was considering the truthful meaning of them.

The negative considerations that she experienced in her depression was what the situation truthfully adds up to. A person is only in such a state because their brain is not being provided the dopamine which is required for the amount of work that is being submitted to it, and which it is trying consider to resolution. 

A person's brain is also a living being, and the various areas of a brain, and have their own awarenesses, which they are eager to share with the person the body belongs to, if they are considered into one. A brain's work is considering, and that work needs dopamine to handle. The needed dopamine could be provided, and it is rightful for it to be provided. So why wasn't it provided?:

Is she not worth it? Is there something wrong with her? Is she less than other people? Didn't she like the good things her brain was considering for her? Is her brain defective and incorrect in thinking that the things its trying to resolve are good to resolve? Is there a problem somewhere in her considering (and this will cause many more considerings to commence) Did she hate her brain? Is her brain unworthy in her sight? Did her brain do something wrong? What did she do wrong?

These are all logical and reasonable things for a brain to wonder when it is not being supplied with the dopamine it is deserving of. Ultimately, her lack of dopamine added up to meaning that her life must not be valuable and of worth. By being squarely responsible for the environment that means these considerations, that is what scientists told her, what doctors told her, what government told her, and what the society formed by these harmful people told her. And all that her brain wanted, and rightfully deserved, was dopamine.

Depression was her brain pleading with her to supply it the dopamine it needed to handle and resolve the work it was trying to accomplish. Depression was her brain knowing that it was giving its full self the considering of perfection within her, like her own Jesus, and despite giving absolutely everything to her, she wasn't giving it the one thing it needed to make everything good for them together, as one life. Her brain would have experienced the confusion and desperation of a child being mercilessly suffocated by a parent who they fully loved and had given their full self to serve.

This girl died explicitly for the sake of the prejudices of highly sociopathic, society-deceiving, and self-rewarding doctors, and scientists, and for the sake of their century of lies. She died so that doctors could tell themselves they are good dogs when they feed the lies of institutional medicine to society, causing a shutting-down of considering in doctor's brain once they convince themselves that they are in the right, causing a stream of dopamine to free up within their brains, giving them a "reward"-high . That release of dopamine was not rightfully theirs, and they are undeserving of it. That release of dopamine was stolen from Aletha and millions of others. It was the dopamine that Aletha needed to live, which was taken from her for the self-servingness of doctors, and scientists, and all those that uphold institutional medicine.

This girl was liquidated by doctors and scientists. And contrary to the outward expressions they would make, the doctors and scientists wouldn't have it any other way - and a century of their arrogance didn't have it any other way.

Depression didn't lie to her, because depression was her brain considering the truth of what was happening. But the society formed doctors, scientists, and government lied to her, and had conditioned her to ignore the things that fundamentally mattered - to ignore the desperate pleas and needs of her most special and intimate friend, the one that works perfectly to help create her meaning, potential, success, happiness, dreams...

And by saying that depression lies, guilt is being shifted from where it belongs, which is at the feet of doctors, who are the perpetrators of lies, and to where it doesn't belong - which is, at best, a figment, and at worst, accusing one's own truth-considering mind of being dishonest for wondering the things that the false considerations of doctors truthfully add up to.



v.

And again, from the article:

"The lies of depression can exist only in isolation. Brought out into the open, lies are revealed for what they are."

Isolation is what happens to considerations in a brain when there isn't dopamine enough for them to connect with other considerations to the extent that they can form reasons, together. A lone consideration has no value, no purpose, and no truth. It is reason that lets a consideration enter into all of those things. And dopamine is reason for that connectivity within a brain. Dopamine is truth to a brain's capability to consider. Without it, a consideration falls into darkness. And as life is the movement created by considering, which is one consideration giving itself to another, when a consideration becomes isolated, it dies.

From the article:

"Here is the truth: You have value. You have worth. You are loved. Trust the voices of those who love you. Trust the enormous chorus of voices that say only one thing: You matter. "

Reason's primary principle: Everything necessarily means every else. If the above statements are true, then a brain is worthy of the dopamine it is made to have, and which its work is accomplished by. And if a brain is refused that dopamine, and if a brain is told it is right that it is not being delivered that dopamine, then the above statement can not be true, and everything about the brain's existence will confirm this - because a brain is made to have plenty of dopamine, and dopamine is meant to be available within a brain.

If the above quoted statements are true, then a person must allow its brain the dopamine which is essential to its growth and good health, and to its worthy comfort, and which is a belonging part of it having value, worth, and of being loved. A truth-considering brain cannot be fooled - so long as it is denied the dopamine it needs, it will know that something is missing, and its work will suffer. Otherwise, its considerations will die until it is working beneath its dopamine availability's headroom. But a person is their considerations, and to let them die is to let aspects of the person die. And if some aspects of the person are let to die, then why not the others? And by what authority or arrogance does one or some considerations elects others of the same body to die, while they live? Life is all, or nothing, and institutional medicine is explicitly telling those with mental stress that their lives are not valued by doctors, scientists, and government, other than to serve as their lucrative livestock.

vi.

Teenagers are particularly vulnerable to dopamine deficiency / mental stress because of all the additional work that their brains are performing at this time of heightened development, and consequently, teenage years are among the most valuable for a person to boost their dopamine levels, to fortify the robustness of that development, so that their mind and body will be at its strongest for the rest of their lives.

Other key areas of life that are prime periods for boosting available dopamine availability are during a woman's pregnancy, and also post-childbirth for a woman, and also any other area where a person encounters troubling mental stress, and stress in general.

That stress is a person's brain's workload exceeding the headroom which its available dopamine grants them, and raising available dopamine will raise the headroom that is their brain's healthy work capacity. And doing so will avoid all harms that come from a workload's exceeding of dopamine levels straining a brain and body.

Prevention is the best attitude, and ultimately is the only responsible and reality-based approach.



vii.

Institutional medicine is a lethal racketeering scheme, and doctors are just those stupid, inexperienced, and sociopathic enough to be the oblivious or willing middle-people to pull it off, and who receive benefit for it: Clowns whose entire self-assuredness rests, not in knowing anything, but in sensing authority as existing in the appearance of a peer consensus. They are highly-functional, particularly with fact-memorization, due to having plentiful dopamine-availability, which is due to their being little considering, and due to them constantly issuing themselves the considering-avoiding determination that they're good dogs because they parrot a peer-approved set of things.

Shrapnel

ASMR Response is Dopamine / Understanding Dopamine’s Experience in a Body

ASMR stands for Autonomous sensory meridian response, and is the producing of brain and body tingles and relaxing sensations though auditory “triggers”. There are many YouTube channels dedicated to delivering this type of experience.

Not every person is immediately responsive to ASMR, just as how a thing is considered by a person changes what influence, if any, it will bear within them.

But for those people for whom ASMR is effective, when immersing in sounds and sensations that have considered since your earliest days as a human, to hold relaxing, calming, safety-reassuring, and intimate meaning, the recognition of those associations invokes Reason’s principle, and it relaxes processes within a person’s brain, freeing up potentially very significant amounts of dopamine (more than typical prescription medications will provide a person with).



Also, just like ASMR’s responses can be experienced throughout the body, not just in the head, it is likewise with dopamine’s release. I previously mentioned that an orgasm is entirely the experience of a small surge in dopamine being release in part of a brain, and I’ve also said that when high doses of cocaine are taken, that the same experience occurs throughout a person’s whole body. All the synapses in a brain correspond to something within the human body, and when a synapse becomes flooded with dopamine, the area which corresponds to it will feel good. For lack of having experience, most people may think that the feeling of an orgasm is something unique to sexuality – but this is not the case. That same experience will occur from any and every area and part of the human body, if dopamine is filled in the synapses which correspond to that area of the body.

The feeling of goodness caused by dopamine in a part of a body is also a positive comment on that area of the body, letting it know that it is ready and strongly supported for robust and accurate functionality, and that it has the means to do whatever it needs to, and that experience and knowing is shared throughout a person’s mind and body.

While having dopamine flood synapses which correspond to genitals might (or not, depending on a person’s consideration) provoke a person’s sexual interest, the same is not true regarding having dopamine flood synapses which correspond to non-sexual areas of their body. There is nothing specifically arousal-producing about dopamine, but dopamine is physio-fuel for all a brain’s work, and the more of it that is available to a synapse, the stronger, healthier, better-functioning, alive and awake the physiological processes which listen to that synapse will be. Dopamine really is life, and fullness of life-giving to the brain and body, and as such should be regarded as a first recourse in addressing and preventing health situations – because dopamine is, by natural and good design, a primary consideration to all a brain and body’s work, and everything else exists downstream and is conditional to having enough of it available. To not embrace dopamine is to be in resentment and loathing of one’s own state of being human, and spiting of one’s own better health.



A person who seeks the ASMR experience is seeking the same thing as a person who uses dopaminergics, and is also mostly getting the same thing as a person who uses dopaminergics like crack cocaine, or methamphetamine.

The positive therapeutic effects of ASMR are the positive therapeutic effects of increasing dopamine availability within a brain, and therefore the positive therapeutic effect of using cocaine. Though I would not say that it is equally the therapeutic effect of all dopaminergics, which typically allow adrenaline to increase alongside dopamine, because that adrenaline increase is antagonistic towards stress states, and makes for a very different experience, more challenged experience than dopamine’s increase all on its own.

If a person receives a strong effect from ASMR, then they can understand what cocaine feels like, knowing that experience for themselves, and being a partaker in that experience. Of course, by using cocaine, that experience can be made much greater, penetrate more deeply, and be more consistent, and work even with people who don’t react greatly to ASMR. Understanding this, a person who is familiar with strong ASMR responses should easily realize how positive cocaine use is for stress states, and for positively and successfully addressing various negative health states.

Shrapnel

Licensed Doctors and Medications are Entirely Without Relevance to Genuine Treatment of Mental Stress Ailments

i.

The justification for many common medications rests on a trial-based framed-conclusion of "Medication X is believed to... [a listing positive objectives] ". Below I give the context for what the "is believed to" is based on, when it describes a medication.


The designs of prescribed medications for mental stress ailments are such that they locks in a person's ailment, whatever it may be, for as long as possible, while the doctor profits from seeing the patient each time they need a prescription refill, and the drug manufacturer profits from having their drugs purchased. The helpfulness of prescription medications for mental stress ailments rides the very line between potentially beneficial to some, and definitively non-helpful to all. And when a pharmaceutical company develops and markets a new medication, their barometer for a successful medication is that the medication can be, if trial results are considered in a selective, very framed manner, potentially, by surface appearance, more positive than negative for a sizeable number of people. That's not to say that it will be positive for anybody, but that it passes the most meager qualification to be technically definable as not completely negative, and hypothetically better than nothing.

If the array of medications prescribed for treatment of mental stress conditions were any less effective, they would be indisputably harmful for all who take them. The device of restraint in these medications, which makes them of extremely marginal use, when they are useful at all, is their aversion to increasing a person's dopamine availability to any meaningful measurement, if at all. And doctors tell themselves all kinds of crackpot ideas of why they would not want to allow dopamine to be increased, but the truth is that a person only has a mental stress condition because they lack the released dopamine to handle work that their brain is trying to accomplish. And so, if a doctor is not willing to address mental stress ailments like depression, anxiety, psychosis, schizophrenia, PTSD, etc, then they should say that outright, and not waste and liquidate people's lives with phony medications while pretending to be willing to address the issue, when everything they do is to avoid addressing the root cause of these issues. Then, a person can know that they'll have to go elsewhere, if they want accurate and honest treatment for their mental stress condition.


ii.

To characterize the usefulness of various medications being used to treat mental stress issues, if there were a line of usefulness neutrality, and to the right of the line were increments going from a beneficialness of +1 up to a beneficialness of +50, and to the left of the line, increments going from beneficialness of -1 to -50, then the average performance of contemporary prescription medications for metal stress would be characterized as a neutral. And again, this is by design. Pharmaceutical companies are not under a legal obligation to cure anybody, and for the sake of capitalism, they are not seeking to cure anybody. Their immense financial profits come from perpetually treating people, and having people to treat, and not from having cured people. But they, and doctors, should be upfront when people come to them for help, and tell people that they are only willing to provide what is lucrative for them, and if what they provide marginally helps the person, then that can be viewed as a bonus for the person who needs the help.

If Methamphetamine were represented in this manner, used in the best manner, it could maybe achieve a +15 in usefulness for some people, and maybe only a +5 for others.

If cocaine were depicted, used in the right manner, then cocaine can deliver a full +50 performance for the average person.


Also, doctors beliefs are very commonly filled with crackpot presumptions about how a medication is effective:
- Some of them actually believe that when a person's tolerance levels out any experience of a medication is where the medication becomes effective.
- Many think that a person showing interest in the positive effect of a medication is a warning sign that they should not be receiving any more of the beneficial medication, as if the sign of improvement over a state of suffering is to not recognize, acknowledge, or value the improvement. And a lot of people who require dopamine-increasing medications know this, and taper their expressions accordingly (just like how pharmaceutical companies taper the effectiveness of their medications so that they deliver the least-possible performance while still being marketable) - the arrogant stupidity of doctors makes dishonesty with them a necessary policy for many people, and this doesn't help things in the long run.

And there are lots of other examples of backwards thinking in professional doctor views, where they seem to be entertaining a mystical enigma of 'the cure is not the cure', 'the ailment is the answer', 'to rationalize the ailment is to be treated'.


ii.

Generally, a doctor is going to be the last person who can be trusted for informed and objective input when it comes to mental stress treatment, drug use, proper medicine application... their working information is purely ignorant fiction, not really any more relevant than medieval superstition: It's just a modern dogma. The information by which doctors are educated is heavily contrived and artificial, and is merely convention, a conduct to follow, a line of thinking to stick to, but is wholly different than the truth of positive and successful health treatment. Doctors also have no real-world experience to draw from to form opinions on the medications which they so confidently give opinions regarding. Their scholastic success was due entirely to them having a level of dopamine availability within their own brains that it leaves them comprehensively unaware of just how unaware they are when it comes to dopamine deficiency ailments.

If a person's improvement isn't obvious to them, they should seek something better, because all degrees of better exist, and have existed longer than institutional medicine's diversions and harmful myths. And if a person doesn't feel the difference a medication makes very clearly, then it isn't doing anything, and anything a person suspects it may be doing is mostly placebo (which is itself dopamine increase), and less than real. And when a person doesn't properly address a mental stress condition within themselves, they are setting their brain and body up for further issues in life, and well as concessions in their experiences, and successes. Whether aware of it or not, a doctor's role when it comes to mental stress ailments is only as a lobbyist for companies who profit off the liquidation of innocent people's lives.

Shrapnel

Regarding Cocaine's Applicability for Treating Migraines (2nd Addendum)

Related posts:
1. Just a Tip (Regarding news of genetic mutations being responsible for such or such a condition)
2. Adendum - Migraines are Dopamine Deficiency - and also: The Importance of Tact in Dopaminergic Application - and also: The Importance of Considering the Truth



i.

Self-Medication of Migraine Headaches with Freebase Cocaine

Excerpt:

He first tried smoking freebase cocaine at age 27 at
the urging of a friend who suggested that it might
help a headache he had at the time. Indeed, he
noticed immediate and complete relief lasting between
five and fifteen minutes, after which the euphoric
peak subsided and his headache returned. He found
that he could sustain relief with each additional “hit
off the pipe” for another five to fifteen minutes, after
which the headache returned again. Eventually, he
depleted the supply of cocaine, “crashed,” and fell
asleep. When he awoke, the headache was gone. He
repeated this pattern for the next three headaches he
had. After his fourth episode of smoking cocaine, he
began to use cocaine even when he did not have a
headache. The cocaine never brought on a migraine
headache if he did not already have one at the beginning
of use.


Now, the part of most value from the above quotation is " Indeed, he noticed immediate and complete relief". This is because migraines are an expression of dopamine deficiency, and their perfect solution is increasing dopamine availability, while restraining adrenaline - which is the effect of cocaine. So, like I said elsewhere, there is no room for a greater perfection in cure than the state of +1 being applied to a state of -1, to address and treat the ailing state of -1.

The effect of cocaine is the 1:1 solution to all dopamine deficiency ailment. There is no more accurate solution, and none which addresses the root cause of dopamine deficiency, as cocaine does. Anything less than this is not addressing the root of the problem, and is avoiding the real issue.

This awareness of the real cure for people's ailments is the place to start when trying to treat them. And people cannot be properly treated so long as their one and only cure is avoided, as though it is a negative thing. And if a person's curing is a negative thing, why are people seeking treatments at all? If they don't want to be cured, well, that's already the situation - then their desire is fulfilled. If they do want to be cured, then they're going to have to accept the cure.


A secondary, but notable consideration from the above quotation include the duration of relief, which is mentioned as being 5 - 15 minutes. That is also the specific duration of crack cocaine's effect, depending on how much is smoked. Insufflated, or cocaine that is inhaled through the nose, lasts 40 - 50 minutes, and cocaine that is swallowed (such as in a capsule) lasts 50 - 60 minutes. Though oral cocaine can take up to an hour to kick in, and so isn't ideal for immediate relief. An exception is if cocaine is dissolved in liquid, and drunken - then it can take effect almost immediately.

Smoking crack every 5 - 15 minutes is a lot of upkeep, but inhaling a line of cocaine every 50 minutes or so, or talking a gulp of water every hour, is not significant upkeep, and is a miracle to resolve what has no other genuine cure.

There are things to be done with this knowledge to resolve the returning of migraines for good - and they also involve starting with the truth, which is the information that I've now provided above. The root cause of migraines, and their cure, is now openly known.



ii.

Also of significance in the above except is that there are non-substantiated and purpose-undefined ad hominem used to describe the anecdote. And that is a common liberty taken, and abused by doctors when engaging in subjects for which they hold trained prejudices. Examples include:

- "after which the euphoric peak subsided". What did euphoria have to do with the person's motivation for smoking the crack, or the measurement of its effective timeline? And did the person use the word euphoria to describe their alleviation from migraines? If having the availability of dopamine which a brain naturally requires simply to accomplish its work and not be suffering in terrible agony is considered to be the state of euphoria, when concerning mental stress sufferers, then every mental stress sufferer deserves euphoria, as a fundamental right. Was the doctor who wrote the above quote themselves in a state of euphoria, not suffering migraines, themselves?

The word's use appears to be arbitrary and without merit, connecting to no other provided consideration, and so giving no possible positive contribution to the description, though offering potential negative interpretation by feeding pre-existing prejudice in readers. The word's use is therefore not an objective use, but a biased and slanted expression, denoting that the writer is expressing themselves through socipathic brain-wiring.

- and also "Eventually, he depleted the supply of cocaine, “crashed,” and fell asleep". How was crashing measured, and how is it defined here beyond patronizing quotation marks which evoke sentiment, rather than consideration? How does crashing differ from sleeping? This addition appears to be sentiment in lieu of consideration, which is a sociopathic conduct.


There is no objectivity apart from having consideration to illuminate the truth of a matter. But because of their egregious lack of consideration, doctors typically do not have an understanding of what objectivity is to be capable of being it. And to the typical doctor, objectivity is but a peer-approved mode of behaviour towards a particular thing - Objectivity™. And they can be predisposed to forming their arbitrary concept of what objectivity is, when it comes to discussing the matter of drugs which they did not prescribe themselves, out of a monkey see monkey do, or, sociopath see, sociopath do, type of mentality. Basically, they often just parrot each others' abject stupidity, and invest their sentiments into the determinations they pick up from one another.

Because they lack a substantiation of truth within their brain's consideration structure, the layering of identical agreeing voices upon one another to give a +1 to a shared determination, such as peer approval or a peer review, is like crack to a sociopath, because there is little else to offer validation to the sociopath's sense of worth.


The expressions that I've noted above matter, as they spread consideration among readers, and all consideration is contributing towards a movement. Mental stress ailment persists in society because of seemingly innocuous callousness. As I said before, "Essentially, a person who believes in dopamine as reward thinks that deactivating their brain after doing nothing truthful is a state of reward, while not understanding that all they actually accomplished is the bringing of some negative consideration-value into the world, which will exist as an offence to the truth until somebody else does the work to righten the perceptions which were influenced by it."



iii.

Now, elsewhere, you can read it said that migraines might be, or are caused by a hyper-sensitivity to dopamine. A sociopath lack connectivity between considerations, and this is what's behind scientists and doctors commonly using words without there being any connectivity between the considerations of the subjects involved - which is the definition of mindless.


A sensitivity to dopamine would imply that dopamine's effect is experienced more strongly. But none of the descriptions of a purported 'sensitivity to dopamine' reflect any of dopamine's effect or experience.

The effects of a migraine cannot be caused by sensitivity to dopamine, because dopamine's effect, when increased and amplified, is not any of the elements of migraines - and therefore the experiences of a migraine do not befit a description of sensitivity to dopamine. A sensitivity to dopamine would be like getting a cocaine high, or a stronger cocaine high - which a brain handles to a very, very large capacity, and which is a positive experience, and which actually alleviates all the things which are described in migraines. So whatever the reasoning behind such a misnomer, it's incorrect. And that fuck-up is typical when a scientist or doctor makes determinations based off of their blind and prejudice observation.

The antagonizations described actually correlate very accurately to how increasing adrenaline in an already-stressed brain experiences. And as I said in the previous post, "sufficiently increasing dopamine availability relative to other things will alleviate a migraine - but try to not also increase adrenaline and noradrenaline at the same time, because that would be counter-productive, and could exacerbate part of the migraine". Also, increasing dopamine via common prescription drugs incurs a significant increase in adrenaline / noradrenaline, and even cocaine can cause an increase in adrenaline / noradreanline. So, the connectivity between the considerations of the subject appears to lead to a well-reasoned conclusion, which is converse in very primary ways to a suggestion that migraines could be result of a sensitivity to dopamine. It gives account for many more considerations that the alternate, and as a consideration is a quantum of truth, it is the greater truth by default.


With scientists and doctors, just as with government, when a surface picture enables for a framing that caters to held prejudices, then all standard qualifications for assessing the truth of a matter are thrown out the window. And there are many more problems with the 'migraines / dopamine sensitivity' convention than what I've mentioned here, but responding to all parts of what is succinctly a pile of garbage is not my main mission, but rather to address the root cure for mental stress ailment.

Even when doctors use terms like "root cause", they don't mean it literally, but mean it only as a buzz-word, like Root Cause™. And they use this term as a buzz-word, despite them not having any experience or knowledge that would grant them any tangible understanding concerning actual root causes of the things they apply the term to.

What I mention in this blog discusses the actual, genuine root cause of ailments such as ADHD, depression, anxiety, psychosis, schizophrenia, PTSD, alzheimer's, parkinson's, bi-polar, and more.



Btw, you'll notice that the allotment of exacerbation of migraine symptoms due to dopamine, rather than adrenaline / noradrenaline increases (which commonly releases in response to dopamine) represents a perfect inaccuracy, much like the labelling of dopamine as reward rather than as physio-fuel. As I said, making determinations aligns a person's considerations against the truth. As I've long said, all conventional medicine is tailored to the perceptions of sociopaths.



iv.

Having identified the perfect cure for migraines is great, and let's a person know where to begin when addressing their own migraine, and it enables people who actually intend to cure migraines to start behaving positively towards that end. The place to start is with the knowledge of the cure. There is just one perfect cure, which is whatever delivers the perfect counterpart to what's causing the issue, and this is it.

If every component of a resolution of migraines in society forms a concept, which is an ordering of considerations that resolves into a ring of truth, and the greater concept of resolving migraines in society is comprised of these rings, which are each a concept yet also each an individual consideration within a greater concept, then a migraine's cure as being precisely dopamine presents the primary consideration, which all other secondary considerations will conform to, and are to serve. And with a migraine's cure now being resolved, then secondary considerations can begin to be worked to resolution. Each successive consideration in the greater subject of resolving migraines in society will be easier to resolve once the primary consideration is established.

However, sociopaths tend to obstruct primary considerations, using secondary and lesser considerations as excuses for why primary considerations cannot be allowed to be considered by those who they are to serve. This is the only reason why mental stress ailment persists within society.


Now that I have made clear that increasing dopamine availability is the cure, as in the actual and exact cure, for mental stress ailments, surely those who present themselves as those who treat people's afflictions will be eager to deliver and make it accessible to those suffering ailments caused by its lack. Surely, their primary consideration in treating people is the genuine curing of them, and not something else - like ideology, reputation, profit, sentiment, control, ego, etc.

As I said in a previous post, by having the knowledge of dopamine, mental stress ailments become choices - both for the individual, and for society.

Shrapnel

Adendum - Migraines are Dopamine Deficiency - and also: The Importance of Tact in Dopaminergic Application - and also: The Importance of Considering the Truth

Related post: Just a Tip (Regarding news of genetic mutations being responsible for such or such a condition)


i.

Oh, and it should go without saying, but migraines are also a product of there being insufficient dopamine for a brain to handle work that is processing through it, and, yes, sufficiently increasing dopamine availability relative to other things will alleviate a migraine - but try to not also increase adrenaline and noradrenaline at the same time, because that would be counter-productive, and could exacerbate part of the migraine.

To do this is to treat the dopamine deficiency symptom at its root and source. To do anything other is to either be in denial of one's real problem, or to be self-spiting of one's own human being.

The pain of a migraine is a part of a brain's voice, and it is crying in anguish precisely for dopamine, which it essentially needs. Does a person ignore a baby that is screaming in pain if there is some anomaly afflicting it? Why would they act so inhumanely towards their very own brain, leaving it in a state of torture while it tries to do good work for the person? Such is an ultimate irresponsibleness and self-spitefulness. A person who cannot come to grips with the state of being a human is not worthy of being one, and is a danger to themselves, and a harmful influence within society.



ii.

But in all dopaminergic application, tact is all-mattering. Robin Williams, someone who endured various dopamine deficiency ailments, and took cocaine, and yet in the end wasn't helped by it, would be a text-book example of how not to pursue dopaminergism, if the knowledge to develop an understanding of these things to be put into a book had been pursued by any in the previous century, instead of engaging the quintessential sociopathic conduct of insisting sentiment-base determinations to people, to lying to people about the nature of dopamine and dopaminergics and building walls of propaganda and indoctrinating doctors using institutional falsehoods to turn them into agents of fallacy.

Robin Williams could have straight-forwardly been cured of his Parkinson's, anxiety, and depression using cocaine. He, too, was a victim of institutional misinformation on drugs, and of those who perpetuate that misinformation.

One of the most essential things to avoid in dopaminergic application is any sense that it is wrong to take these drugs, however a person feels they would like to take them. Regardless of whether a person harbours insecurities about increasing their dopamine, their brain still fundamentally depends on, and operates on dopamine. When a person is insecure about taking cocaine, or other dopaminergic, which is only from a century of false messaging by doctors, scientists, and government, that uncertainty and worry is a belief held by consideration, which is represented as synaptic connections within their brain.

Considerations have polarity, and receive their identity as relative to one another. And such a belief aligns certain considerations in a negative manner, and for as long as it evaluates as True towards the activity a person is engaging in, all signals relating to that activity will pass through that consideration, and receive an antagonistic influence, a quantum of negative consideration-value, which can infect the whole mind. And increasing adrenaline and noradrenaline will accelerate the considering of those things that are worries, and progressively amplify the presence of negative consideration-value in the brain until a time when things settle down and they can be reconsidered into normalcy. This is where drug-induced anxiety and psychosis come from - there is nothing inherent in the drugs taken themselves that cause these things, but it is a contagion created by doctors, scientists, and government, out of their sociopathic inclinations to attempt to justify their own statuses by demeaning and harming those of others, who they deem as targets for their prejudice.



iii.

All anti-drug propaganda bears a negative consideration-value within society, and the accrued negative consideration-value in society because of the previous century of anti-drug propaganda is tremendous, and it has killed many people, and has destroyed many families.

Despite its awful influence in society, every human being's brain and body still fundamentally runs on the things people have been taught to be scared by - and much unfortunate drug behaviour is no different than a you girl who is abused by their parents, being told she's a worthless slut who won't amount to anything, growing up to become a promiscuous and alcoholic vagrant (though these individual activities, if done within their control and awareness, and by their own choosing, would not be wrong). Such a person is not a statement against the harms of the alcohol or drugs they may use, but delivers an indictment against those who delivered to her the hateful messaging which considered through her, shaping the neurological pathways that guide her behaviour.

It is the same with negative drug usage patterns in society - none of them were caused by drugs, themselves, but were created by scientists, doctors, and governments, who then profit from their existence, and use them as false-justification to further the messaging that created them in the first place.

In the end, the Truth itself will require there to be full justice for those who were unfairly subjected to and manipulated by anti-drug propaganda, and who received mistreatment at the hands of those those who peddled that propaganda.



iv.

Also, ironically, when anti-drug propaganda is being administered to a society, there is a growth in sociopathism within that society, and a reduction in intelligence within that society, and the harms put into children and teenagers are those very ones which anti-drug propaganda would have them think come from drugs: Considering is the mechanism behind evolution, and a brain develops its connections through the course of considering. Those connections themselves represent the considerations of a person's mind, and greater Truth is manifest the more considerations are accounted for within an environment - and considerations which resolve into one form concepts. A determination is like a road-block that prevents considering from occurring - and the more determinations held in a mind, the less presence of truth there is in that mind, and the more selfish and sociopathic it is likely to be.

Anti-drug propaganda is not based in truth, but in sentiment-based determinations, disseminated and practised by truth-lacking sociopaths - and its influence is killing of the mind of society, and creating of all kinds of diseases. Conversely, taking many of the drugs anti-drug propaganda frightens people away from commonly greatly improves a healthy development of mind, and fortifies both physical and mental health.

So when anti-drug propaganda told people "this is your brain on drugs", that imagery and message was, in truth, what was being done to the brain of every person who believed that message. While the drugs they were being warned against did and do the opposite - they provide a person with the physio-fuel that makes them healthier, smarter, and more capable for good (though to use it is a person's choice). As I've said, a determination is a falsehood by nature, which reduces consideration (a consideration being a quantum of truth, and a quantum of mind), and which aligns a person's considerations antithetically to the truth.

Doctors and scientist and governments have brain-washed people into being scared of the very thing that cures them - and so they are made to suffer all kinds of artificially-created ailments. But in the end, just as in the beginning, the human brain effectively runs on the effect of cocaine, which is actually literally good by nature. And if a person is encountering an issue within themselves, particularly within their mind, the effect of cocaine would be a reliably good place to start addressing it, as a first recourse. It is good, normal, and healthy for a person to use drugs which they recognize by their own judgement as contributing positively inside of themselves - and no one on the outside is capable of casting a judgement over that.

The Truth is real, and cannot be determined, but can only come to be known by being considered.


Continued in this post: Regarding Cocaine's Applicability for Treating Migraines (2nd Addendum)

Shrapnel

Article: What Causes Autism?

Article: What Causes Autism?


Well, just as medications which alleviate symptoms of depression, anxiety, psychosis, tend to increase dopamine, so also do medications which alleviate symptoms of autism tend to increase dopamine. This all makes sense, since increasing available dopamine increases healthy development in a brain, while lack of dopamine leads to all types of mental stress ailments, general health problems, and impoverished brain development. So I would venture that autism, a development issue, is caused by a pregnant woman experiencing dopamine deficiency during their pregnancy, at least in some regions of their brain.

If so, then addressing the problem at its root would be to increase dopamine during pregnancy, to avoid unwanted development issues.

Of course, having more dopamine leads to improved health and development in general, while lacking dopamine means a greater vulnerability to health issues in general, and impoverished development in specific:
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2016/01/articles-poverty-may-alter-wiring-of.html
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2015/12/articles-stress-could-increase-risk-of.html
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2015/09/managing-and-increasing-dopamine-can.html
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2015/12/am-eclectic-assortment-of-articles.html
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2015/12/a-few-more-for-eclectic-assortment-of.html


And use of cocaine during pregnancy is shown to improve fetus development:
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/24283537_Prenatal_cocaine_increases_dendritic_spine_density_in_cortical_and_subcortical_brain_regions_of_the_rat


Also, cocaine, whose effect is to increase dopamine's availability while inhibiting adrenaline's release, delivers literally the antithetical influence as schizophrenia on brain development, boosting growth in the region associated with learning and memory, and like all dopaminergics, including the "smart drug" modafinil, enhancing a brain's capabilities (which would be relevant to enhancing fetus development):
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17641875
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2016/01/articles-study-suggests-genetics-could.html


And the myth of crack babies, babies being born with issues do to their mother using crack during their pregnancy, has appropriately been debunked:
http://articles.philly.com/2013-07-22/news/40709969_1_hallam-hurt-so-called-crack-babies-funded-study
http://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Family/2013/0725/Crack-baby-development-issues-not-side-effect-of-drug-but-poverty
http://www.businessinsider.com/crack-baby-myth-debunked-2013-7
http://www.salon.com/2013/07/23/longterm_study_debunks_myth_of_the_crack_baby/


It may well be that the very best thing for a pregnant woman to do to prevent health issues for their child, while fortifying their child's development, is put aside time to relax and smoke crack, or to take cocaine, while in their pregnancy.


But medical research cannot be relied upon to inform a public concerning this, because all scientific research, and particularly drug and health research, is egregiously biased, contrived, and unreliable, with at least (I will clarify this in another post) 60% of researchers publishing biased, and therefore False information as conclusions. And when it comes to drug research, I think virtually all conclusions are slanted (and therefore directing away from the truth). I would even say that a medical researcher is, by default, in the position of being an unreliable witness, since they, their field, and their funding providers stand to benefit from falling short of delivering real solutions (and this is a recipe for disaster in Reward-oriented mindsets, who are also sociopathic by nature, and therefore predisposed to being untruthful):
http://www.nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248

Particularly when it comes to drug and health research:
http://www.bmj.com/content/349/bmj.g7015

Which requires government license to study, and governments are not that likely to approve research which they don't like the objectives of, particularly when there is a history of such research being shut down, to go alongside with a history of such research delivering fabricated, or conniving conclusions:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/jun/13/bad-science-cocaine-study
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2016/01/looking-at-instance-of-deliberately.html
http://www.shrapnelreason.com/2014/08/response-to-cocaine-study-bearing.html


I would put forth that 90%+ of what is read as health research is not true at all, and is either wilfully directed, or conducted by people who are sociopathic, who cannot arrive at unbiased conclusions because they have corrupted the connectivity in their brain that gives a person their perception - with the inter-connectivity between all considerations substantiating what is being what manifests truth.


Related post: Cocaine Use During Pregnancy Can Prevent Autism

Shrapnel

The Placebo Effect is Belief Freeing Up Dopamine to Help Healing Consider

Related previous post: Overview of Why Placebo Works, and Isn't Really Placebo After All


This post completes the understanding and the picture of what placebo actually is for human health.



Considering is the means by which a brain accomplishes all work, and dopamine's availability is what gives a brain its capability to consider.

Whatever a person's ailing state is, the brain addresses it by trying to consider its healing - and as it does, everything that's involved in its healing is called into effect. If there is little dopamine available, it will require more effort for a brain to positively address an ailing state. If there is more dopamine available, it will be easier for a brain to address an ailing state, and address it more comprehensively.

When a person believes anything uncertain regarding their health, or anything indefinite, or worrying, the considering processes that stem from those beliefs deplete a person's dopamine availability, reducing a brain's capability to address any afflictions. When a person believes, accepts, has faith and hope that their health is improving, that things are OK, that their medication is real and helpful, the effect on a person's brain is relaxing, resolving and desisting many considering processes and freeing up much dopamine.

The positive belief that a person has of their improving state creates a 'This is' point and understanding in the brain, engaging all the things involved in that concept and considering them towards a unified True, and available dopamine will be allocated towards completing that considering. Freed up dopamine contributes to the considering-unto-resolution any afflicted states, bolstering their overcoming and mending.

The greater a person's genuine belief in their healing, the more their brain will be considering towards that state of being healed - because of Reason, which uses dopamine to bring a person closer towards the state of being healed.

Likewise, just as cocaine boosts all positive mental capabilities by producing a proficient and healthier-than-natural release of a person's own dopamine, it can also be an excellent means to fortify healing from all things in general - whether that's physical wounds, mental health issues, emotional trauma, chronic pain, recovery from surgery...



Dopamine is key to a person's good physical and mental health, and their forward development. But while dopamine is promoting of beneficial physiological maintenance and development, adrenaline is antagonistic upon already-afflicted states. So, the secret formula to maximize speed of health recovery, and positive further development is to restrain adrenaline while proficiently boosting dopamine - which is the effect of cocaine.

Cocaine used to be regarded a miracle cure, useful for treating just about anything. Then sentiments, politics, ideologies (including racial prejudices), uncertainty, and fears came into play, but cocaine never changed. It still is the miraculous curative power it was initially regarded as being, greater in potential to restore and fortify health than any other medicinal means available to this world at this present time.



Cocaine is the penultimate poster-child of what thing is good for a person to put into their body to increase its health, and their positive growth. And all perceived threats regarding cocaine came not from cocaine, but from some of society's reaction to it - just as the outcome to Portugal's decriminalization of all drugs shows that the biggest threat involving drugs has always been the effects created by governmental and institutional opposition to them, and their failure to react sensibly.

There are questions regarding dopaminergics, health, and individual behaviour, and all of them have complete answers and positive resolutions, none of which indict dopamine, or cocaine - whose dopaminergic effect is already fundamental to all positive human experience, accomplishment, and potential. And all mental stress ailments, and many things which are not conventionally perceived to be a matter of mental stress, emerge only downstream from the malnourishment of having a lack of dopamine availability. To address all these things at their root is to accept dopamine as the fundamental mental-task processing-fuel that it is.



Placebo works according to a person's belief because Reason Is, and because dopamine / cocaine is the consideration which enables a brain to accomplish all its work. Placebo works because cocaine works because dopamine works.

In making known the "placebo effect"'s mechanism of action, I have now given full clarity to what has been yet another "long-standing mystery" to those who practice and preach institutional medicine.

Clearly, the understanding I work with is one and the same as truth, while that of those who call themselves scientists evaluates as False next to mine. And, clearly, the means by which I work are confirmed by the connecting of all points and accounting for all things, to be truth, just as by the things those means reveal - but the means of scientific methodology are falsehood-bearing jalopies in the face of reality. Therefore, a single person speaking in Reason is greater than the collection of all not yet in Reason. How many more miracles are needed to be spoken by me?

Shrapnel

Articles: Poverty may alter the wiring of kids’ brains / Children from wealthy families grow up as extroverts, earn more in life

Article: Poverty may alter the wiring of kids’ brains

This is something that I've written about on this blog before, and I've said that the greatest harm done by poverty is the impact it has on a person's dopamine availability, which all development is conditional to.

The added stress in the lives of poor people creates more tasks for their brains, which drags on their dopamine availability, as dopamine is required to make choices, and worries involve lots of perpetual choice-making while a person tries to keep themselves afloat. This drag on a person's dopamine availability is what leads to depression and many other disorders, such as psychosis and anxiety.

Dopamine is what gives a brain its work potential, and when a brain's dopamine availability becomes impoverished, that gets reflected in its development. And poverty's greatest harm is the impact that it has on a person's dopamine availability, with low dopamine leading to all sorts of negative health developments.

Mental stress is literally a lack of available dopamine within a brain, meaning that a brain is trying to do more work than it has the dopamine to properly handle. Boosting dopamine conversely creates the opposite situation as that of a stressed brain, which is why "smart drugs" like modafinil, and other powerful dopaminergics like cocaine very effectively increase a person's cognition, control and accuracy of thought, and their overall working smarts.


Mice Fed with Cocaine Show Growth in Brain Areas Linked with Learning, Memory
Cocaine enhances memory storage in mice
Cocaine self-administration improves performance in a highly demanding water maze task.
Dopamine impacts your willingness to work
Cocaine study that got up the nose of the US
1995 World Health Organization cocaine report

Now, in the reverse situation, where worries aren't challenging a brain's dopamine budget, the opposite outcome occurs.

Article: Children from wealthy families grow up as extroverts, earn more in life

Dopamine's influence is simply like a dial that increases all a person's mental capacities when it is increased, and conversely diminishes all a person's mental capacities when decreased. A person's physical capacities are dependent upon their mental capacities, so these decrease as well with lower dopamine, and increase with higher dopamine.

Dopamine, effectively, is everything to human health, happiness, success, enjoyable experience, control. Because all these things are the expression of signals being able to be assemble, and considerations working with each other - and dopamine is the mechanism that lets any information assemble within a brain, and enables a person to make a choice. Without dopamine, a person can't know, and can't even know what it is they want to know. The human brain is wholly dependent upon having enough dopamine, and without dopamine, a person's positive brain activity stalls, and the person's life is left stagnant or in state of total dependency on things outside of themselves. But with dopamine, everything works.



Back to the second linked-to article, the less available dopamine a person has, the fewer and smaller the considerations they are able to work with at one time without becoming overwhelmed, panicked, stressed, exhausted, etc. The nature of being extroverted is the product of having the dopamine availability to power the sight of mind to see how things come together, to act and navigate comfortably within one's environment.

Also, memory formation and recollection is automatic when there is ample dopamine to handle the considering of experiences, which is what forms memory, and as experiences consider, they become a part of the structure of the brain.

People who grow up in non stressful households, to go on to have a good education and get a good-paying job, often attribute their success to their discipline, their good upbringing, their subscribing the right set of determinations. But as studies show, often the people who are the most functional and who achieve the most success are also the most psychopathic in society - which means they have fewer considerations, which is represented as less connectivity within their brains, which means that these who are among the most successful in society are also actually those who have worked the least, and made the least effort in society - but have constantly been rewarded for it by societal systems that are based on sociopathic determinations.

As I've said, a person's dopamine availability is a far greater determiner for a person's success in life than effort - and that effort only increases as a person's dopamine availability becomes limited.



The lower stress environments that some people grow up in often lead them to mis-attribute their success, and others' failures or states of suffering, to all sorts of determinations they've made themselves, or have been taught. But the reality of it all is that it is only because of how much work each others brain are trying to do, and what impact it has on their dopamine availability.

A determination, while made to form a conclusion that can serve as reason for things, is simultaneously a command to not consider the things regarding which the determination was made. And making determinations puts up many walls in a person's mind and brain. And these walls of 'do not consider' prevent the greater development of a brain.

The determinations a dopamine-rich person makes to rationalize why they succeed and others don't (often made in prejudice against those who haven't succeeded) actually lowers the amount of considering within their brain, and considering is the work that requires dopamine. Therefore, this results in there being more dopamine availability within the brain of a person who shuts down considering by making determinations, and who isn't willing to consider beyond their determinations - but at the same time, their determinations results in them not developing the connections and consideration which results from considering. So they consequently, for all their determinations, strong functionality, and memorized facts, are not particularly insightful, smart, or useful to the truth. But they feel extremely self-assured by their observable successes.



What has happened with society is that, in a tower made up of layers, where each higher layer represents people of a greater complexity of consideration development, smarts, ingenuity, and positive potential, the highest 1/3rd or greater layers have been removed from the top, and placed at the bottom of that tower, because of the determinations and dopamine policies of modern society. The smart people don't even know that they're amazingly smart, because their awareness isn't there due to their dopamine impoverishment as a result of them trying to consider as if true everything in environments built to reward sociopaths for being sociopathic.

I've questioned before how a truthfully considering person could possibly succeed scholastically, when the information presented is simply constructs of static determinations, which don't add up. If a person succeeds in school, even though they're smart by contemporary barometers, they're probably not too smart. Scholastic success is simply the result of having dopamine for fact memorization, which having is regularly the result of being a less considering person.



The lower a person's dopamine availability, the greater effort it takes to do everything. Many successful people, even though they think they've worked hard according to their known experience, are putting out less effort in a week, or month, or year, than many people with low dopamine availability are putting out in a day. And yet society hasn't clued in to the reality that everyone is not working at an equal level, all because of what dopamine is.

So clearly, dopamine cannot be reward, because dopamine comes before all reward, and is enabler for the work that might lead to benefit. As I've long been saying, dopamine is mental task processing fuel, and the means by which the brain accomplishes all work - and without dopamine, work is not possible for a brain, leading to all kinds of suffering, ailment, death, and dependencies.



In the case of doctors, we have people who are of very high dopamine availability, combined with very low considering, very little experience, and a predisposition to making judgements about people of dispositions and experiences that they do not even know or believe exist, based on their ignorant and sociopathic observation. And the result is an ignorance and prejudice-driven industry, which is literally completely unnecessarily liquidating the most dopamine impoverished people, turning them into soylent green, where the soylent green is money.

And, consequently, the people who are doing this are responsible for the states they perpetually treat people for, because their doctrine and prejudices are the barriers that has ensured that the truth of mental stress and its ailments doesn't get addressed.



Because cocaine is the healthier-than-natural release of dopamine within a person's brain, and because increasing dopamine via medication normally has the non-beneficial and stress-worsening consequence of increasing adrenaline, and because all the brain's work is accomplished by having dopamine availability, human are effectively cocaine-based beings - meaning that the human brain runs on, and produces all its health and positive accomplishment by the very effect of cocaine. And when a person has a mental stress ailment, such as depression, anxiety, psychosis, PTSD, bi-polar, autism, schizophrenia, and more... that ailment is directly the outcome and expression of that person, or their parents, having not taken care of their brain and body's own natural cocaine needs.

All of these things are preventable, and addressable. But those practising institutional medicine need to let go of their persistent denial and to stop running away from the truth. They need to stop putting their ideology ahead of truth and people's lives, and be willing to face reality and address the root cause of mental stress and its ailments. And by doing so they will finally be able to stop harming the societies that they live in, and to stop being the real obstacles to genuine health and health treatment in this world.



By this knowledge, Mental Stress, and all its emergent ailments, become choices - both for the individual, and for society.

Shrapnel