Article: "Percocet Ruins Lives", But It Saved This Woman's

Article: Percocet Ruins Lives, But It Saved Mine

If the article's writer better understood what is actually behind the narrative and physiology that suggests a picture of dopaminergics and other drugs as ruining lives, it is likely she would only write the first part of her article's title in parentheses: "Percocet Ruins Lives", But It Saved Mine.

Anyway...

Here's a related post from this blog: Adendum - Migraines are Dopamine Deficiency - and also: The Importance of Tact in Dopaminergic Application - and also: The Importance of Considering the Truth



i.

Imagine seeing a starving person begging a very rich and well-fed person for some food, food that would cost the very rich and well-fed person nothing to give to the starving person, not even their time, because they were paid for the time in which the starving person begged for food from the rich person... and the rich person responded to the starving person, while standing next to a table covered in food, and piling up food onto a plate for themselves, by insisting to the starving person that they've done wrong by thinking they also need food, and that they have a problem of addiction, and that they need to re-evaluate their life in a way that will get them off of food-dependency.


That is a retelling of the exchange that took place in the link-to article, where the woman described:

Last year, while I was at school, I realized that I'd forgotten my pills while visiting home. I didn't notice until, later that week, a migraine came on. After two days of hell, I went to a walk-in clinic not far from campus. The doctor, a thin, grey-haired man, glanced at me through his glasses, and asked, "What brings you in today?"

"Well," I said, "I get migraines, and I've had one for two days now. I left my medication at home over Thanksgiving. I'm going home again next week, so I just need a couple to help me get rid of this headache."

"What do you take?" he asked, without lifting his gaze from the computer screen.
"I have a prescription for Percocet."

He turned and looked at me. "How much do those go for on campus?" he said sarcastically.

"Sorry, what?" I said, confused. I began trying to explain myself. "No, you see, I have a prescription, but I left mine at home and--"

"Ya, I'm sure you do," he said, and proceeded to lecture me about my "addiction," while writing me a prescription to "get me off of it."



So, what if a person who was starving and without access to food was asking somebody with access for food, and the person they asked responded condescendingly and scolded them for having a need of food? Wouldn't such a person who treats another that way qualify as a monster? But the experiences of low dopamine can easily be far more painful and torturous than the experience of starving from lack of food, or dehydration from lack of water.



The conduct of the doctor described by the doctor perfectly resembles what I identified in the post Article: Common brain signature marks autism, attention deficit:

I would presume that a lot of the medical professionals who read this blog don't like it when I write pointed accusations at them, since viewer numbers have always dropped off a steep cliff following such statement since the beginning of the blog, but so what? They're professional murderers and thieves of people's lives, and bringers of suffering to those around the people their doctrine steals the life from. Their entire ideology has been a harmful and indefensible lie, and they've been its advocates. If those whose lives, minds, and dreams have been taken or restrained because of their choices haven't been protected, and neither have been those who truthfully spoke their dopaminergic need, then why should be the egos of those who took those people's lives, minds, and dreams, and who prop up the most malicious and deceptive facade human society ever produced?

Do they condition their willingness to engage the truth upon first having their falseness accommodated and pandered to?


What did Jesus instruct? Was it to hypocritically scold, demean, and disregard whoever asks for something, or to "Give to everyone who asks you", and "Do to others as you would have them do to you"? Did Jesus add an exception of "except where sociopathic granfalloons come into play"?

When doctors base and make their whole lives around denying other people, those most vulnerable and suffering, theirs, as well as keeping them in a state of torture, and condescending, chiding, and shaming them for even just requesting what is their only true relief, how can it be substantiated that the doctors who do this are deserving of anything which they have made for themselves?



ii.

The woman who wrote the linked-to article correctly perceived that the increase in dopamine-availability which oxycodone (the main ingredient in Percocet) provides her is the authentic, needed +1 to her dopamine-deficient state of -1. Or, perhaps the dopamine she receives from the oxycodone in Percocet is only a +6 to her dopamine-deficient state of -17, and yet the difference of being raised to only -11 would still feel like a heavenly relief.

Meanwhile, the typical doctor is probably riding on a baseline dopamine platform of +50, which they produce for themselves by believing that they are good dogs for casting the peer-approved determinations upon other people. And they feel so aggressively entitled to that dopamine-rich state, which is their failure to consider, that it is rare for one of them to open their minds to considering the actual people that they practice their professional rape upon.

To properly care for a person, the person must be considered first. When a doctor is more interested in foisting their dogma upon a person who is suffering, it is not the person they are caring for, but their ideological granfalloon, which they adamantly adhere to so that they can tell themselves what a good dog they are, and shut down all considering work in their brain to induce a greater dopamine-availability. When a doctor acts as the one described by the woman who wrote the linked-to article, they are literally jacking off their brains via their sociopathic stupidity, while chiding a person for recognizing their personal actual need for the same dopamine that the doctor is desperately trying to build up in their science-addled brain.

But since for all things there is an ordering of considerations, and in a case of 'if one then not the other', when a doctor lets their dogmas and granfalloons evaluate as True, so that they can beat a patient with them, then their consideration of the person who is their patient evaluates as False. And without considering the person as they express themselves, they have not cared for the person.



iii.

Also, notice that the doctor described in the woman's article defaulted to a determination about the woman as soon as she described her situation and made her request. The considerations a person puts forth is rolling-out of a blueprint that reveals precisely how their brain is wired. In the case of the doctor described, that person has allocated their determinations to be of greater importance than giving room to let the truth be considered. Because a determination is a falsehood by nature, saying 'these considerations, but not these others', it falsifies the output of any considering that emanates from it:

The Will by which a thing is considered is the Will that is returned at the end of the considering. And the Will placed into a determination is an evaluation of False towards the truth, which is carried through all the considering that streams from that determination, and outputs a conclusion that will be perfectly-antithetical to the truth in some manner, just like in the case of 'dopamine as reward'.

Just as much as it is impossible for a mathematical statement to express a truthful answer if one of its variables is changed from its True form, it is just the same with considering. Determining a false ordering of considerations falsifies the whole work. And it is precisely and only because mathematics obeys the rule of Reason (which I will illustrate at some point) that it works.


 Because the doctor so easily imposed a determination, which he then proceeded to consider as True by act of will, it means that the doctor's mind is wired for falsehood, and that he is highly sociopathic. And because that doctor held their determination as True, from that point onward, he was unable to see anything clearly, and was acting upon a delusion from his own mind. And that delusion harmed the woman who had come to see him, and worsened her dopamine deficiency-based state of suffering.

Normally, when people act on hallucination and are dangerous to other people, they are sometimes locked up and put under observation. Shouldn't doctors be locking themselves up, since their entire ideology is a sociopathic delusion that has harmed, and is continuing to harm many millions of people? By not locking themselves up, to keep the public safe from them and the falsehoods they peddle, they are adding to their hypocrisy.

P.S. - psychology, psychoanalysis, tends to be drivel, but what I speak from shares the same exactness as mathematics, and is why mathematics bears truthful statements. If a doctor imposes a determination which they then consider off of as if it were True, they have formed, and are actively engaging sociopathic connectivity in their brain. And any efforts made though exertion of that falsified ordering of considerations will bear the falsehoods of that circuit passed on in their results. And everything traces back to where it originated, down to the very consideration, its evaluation, and all that made up its environment, including all the furthest reaches of existence.



iv.

Having started this blog due to what I discovered concerning my own severe health ailments, and their successful resolutions, after having spent many, many years as a victim of far too many doctors and specialists, I can state confirmation, that what the woman who wrote the linked-to article described about her experience with a doctor is normal, and that the caring of many, perhaps most doctors is so conditional and superficial that, often, all semblance of it quickly vanishes the moment anything about the doctor's own environment of personal comfort, which is their practice, their feeling of authority, their belief in a dogma, is put to test, even benignly. And the moment that happens, many, many doctors will abuse their position to inflict intimidation, condescension, or spite, even in ways that they fully know can or certainly will be physically or otherwise severely detrimental to a patient. Though there are exceptions, I believe that this describes the temperament of the average doctor, and that their self-assuredness does not come from actually knowing anything, but from the appearance of authority presented by their granfalloon, that they are giving themselves to.

But, when a doctor's caring for patients only exists within the pre-fulfilled context of their personal wants being pandered to, with their title, reputation, office, authority, salary, an easy access to drugs they prevent other people from accessing (depending on where in the world, a doctor is not allowed to write themselves prescriptions. But, a great number of doctors, including ones who are hard-line against writing opioid and stimulant prescriptions to patients, give themselves special prescriptions of these kinds by writing them using names of their family members, that they then pick up themselves, for their own use. Also, there are doctors who write each other friendly bonus prescriptions, thinking as if their special educations make them super-duper good for it), yet they aren't willing to consider anything that puts any of those things at risk, it means that they aren't genuinely caring about other people, but just themselves.



v.

When I read the woman's experience, I am filled with reminder of the awareness that what the doctor aggressively opposes for someone who is most desperately needing of it for her proper, natural health and well-being, has been the foundation for everything that the doctor, with great arrogance, seeks for himself, even through his lecturing of the woman in service of his dogmatic suppositions.

But the difference between the doctor and the woman's pursuit of the same dopamine is that the woman legitimately needed it, and was rightful in acknowledging that and pursuing it, whereas the doctor already had an abundance of it, stored up through the much less legitimate means of circumventing truthful consideration with his determinations. And perhaps he greedily sought more of it by way of congratulating himself for being a good dog by enforcing what is a false and evil ideology, all at the expense of a woman who was suffering specifically because she lacks in availability of that same dopamine - which, for the doctor, doesn't become more available from doing anything right or wrong, good or bad, but from believing to himself that he is now a good dog, resolving any prior considering of the situation and freeing up the dopamine that was being used to connect information required for the sake of that considering.



vi.

I hope that it has become clear to all who read this blog that what a doctor, scientist, or anybody has been justifying as their dopaminergic "reward", their self-pandering entitlement, and their right to feel superior because of their learnedness has actually been nothing more than their colossal inhumane, arrogant stupidity, and selfish bias.

Those who believe 'dopamine as reward' have defined goodness as whatever serves their own personal comfort and bias. Many doctors practice medicine on people because doing so means to them that they've now fulfilled the picture of what is good, and can feel as though they've done their bit, resolving considering in their brain, which delivers them "reward" - and not because they consider the people who have need for help, that they might become empathetic of them. But it is not an action that makes somebody justified or non-justified, but the reason why it was done, with account given for all considerations.

There is a difference between doing what is determined as good because is serves personal reward, and doing what is truly good because to do so is the truth, and so that goodness will be. The former can never be truly good, and the difference is known in the truth.



vii.

In the case of the woman who wrote the article, the doctor who abused her exacerbated her dopamine deficiency by presenting trouble, and non-truthful consideration by his words and attitude, which the woman's brain then had to consider the truth of in the light of a better belief, in order to overcome - and the work of a brain, which is considering, requires dopamine.

"Satan" means 'one who opposes', and this doctor was a satan to this woman, her health, and the truth. But, despite the evils of doctors and their doctrine, look at the final sentence the woman wrote for her article, and notice that she's found the perfect truth, and that the light of the truth has shone through her experience and words:

"I do not have an addiction. I do not have a problem with prescription drugs... I have a solution."

The publishing of her article shows that she did indeed overcome the stress inflicted upon her by the doctor - thanks, in part, to the increase in dopamine-availability that her Percocet provided her with.
But also because she didn't accept the harmful determinations the sociopath doctor imposed upon her, but instead considered her own experience, and had faith in the truth of the matter, which her own experiences taught her.

I think that it is time for society as a whole to overcome the harms and evil of self-"reward"ing doctors, scientists, and their false dogma.

Shrapnel

Article: 'Methylene Blue' may offer new answers in the fight against Alzheimer's

Article: 'Methylene Blue' may offer new answers in the fight against Alzheimer's

Of course, methylene blue is a dopmainergic, meaning it increases dopamine-availability in a brain... with dopamine being the fuel by which a brain processes all information and produces the development that is the result of considering, and the effects of increasing dopamine are increased memory formation and recollection, increased focus, functionality, mental clarity.. and dopamine is the antithetical influence to stress, which anxiety is a form of, as is depression... etc.


So here are some excerpts from the linked-to article:

Their findings, published earlier this week, show that small oral doses of the drug improved memory and brain function in a small number of healthy test subjects.

At Dalhousie University, a recent study found that it can also be an effective and inexpensive add-on treatment for bipolar disorder.

"The patients who were taking the medication felt less depressed," psychiatry professor Dr. Martin Alda told CTV News.

"They felt significantly also less anxious and many of them subjectively felt that their thinking was also more clear."

"Methylene blue has changed my life and I can't say that enough," Boutilier said.

"I just noticed processing improved," Cohen says. "Short term memory improved -- nothing dramatic… just able to remember more things slightly sharper. So, for these reasons, I continue taking it."

Joe Cohen has been self-administering the drug to boost his mental performance.


And another piece of the article says: "Today, it's commonly prescribed to patients with certain blood disorders and psychiatric conditions like schizophrenia."

And, of course, the world's best, healthiest, and most proficient dopaminergic, cocaine, exactly produces growth in the brain regions which schizophrenia correlates to the deterioration of, as well as producing all the linked-to article's aforementioned positives bountifully.



But, back to the article.

So... all the utmost basic and fundamental things that occur any time that dopamine is increased in a person occurs when people take the dopaminergic methylene blue, and the effects of alzheimer's, a mental stress / dopamine-deficiency ailment are subdued by it. I mean, I've said all along that this is what happens, that dopamine increases are the solution to this, and many other ailments, but each time a study finds the exact same outcome to increasing dopamine, they act like it is a new revelation and something that must be studied further to understand... and they take years to study, to form a new effectiveness-reduced pharmaceutical, which they market for the perpetual treatment of the things they refuse to allow the curation of.

It's like they keep running around the same track over, and over, and over, and the answer is plain as day and as obvious as anything ever was in the human race's history on Earth, but they just want to create an alternative-to-truth narrative, thinking that if they simply don't acknowledge the truth, that if they don't look straight at it, that reality will bend to their sociopathic preferences. All these people will face full justice for the things they have not done by the truth.



I can say a lot more about these things, and in some ways I feel like I've only been kicking up the same dust over and over concerning these things, when I still know all else there is to be said. And I know the many things I haven't said, many of which are rudimentary insights. But if what I've already said isn't enough, then it wouldn't make any difference how much more I say, because there is then a clear and defined desire to not engage the truth of this matter. The matter of mental stress ailments is solved, there just needs to be a willingness in people who claim to treat to do good to people who need this solution, in the manner that their brain and body's are designed to receive it, and as it was considered through their evolution to be good.

The cause of mental stress-emergent ailments is dopamine deficiency, to be sure. But the cause of their persistence in society is the sociopathism in the dopamine-plentiful hypocrites who have designated themselves "professionals" in these matters, when the only things they are professional in is evasion of the truth, denial of reality, and subterfuge against humanity.

Shrapnel

Articles: "Could STRESS trigger Alzheimer's" & "Brains can be trained to let go of unwanted thoughts by thinking of them in a new context"

i.

Article: Could STRESS trigger Alzheimer's? Chronic stress 'causes key proteins to cluster in the brain, triggering the disease'

Yes, stress, which is precisely dopamine deficiency down neural pathways which a brain is attempting to consider information through, is mental stress, and yes, alzheimer's is a mental stress-emergent ailment. And yes, preventing stress, such as with cocaine taken with the right consideration, will prevent alzheimer's. And yes, cocaine, together with understanding considering, is panacea for all mental stress-emergent ailments, and will be vital to curing them in this world.


Article: How to banish bad memories: Brains can be trained to let go of unwanted thoughts by thinking of them in a new context

Memories, like all things, are made of considerations. When a person considers, it reorders the considerations of what they're considering, according to how they're being considered. What is helpful and what is harmful can contain the same considerations, but delivered in a different ordering. And all existence, which is made of considerations, adds up to Wholeness, and One, just as Jesus said. Likewise, so does every mind.

Context is the inter-connectivity between considerations, and that inter-connectivity changes if a matter is re-considered. And therefore, what that thing is, also changes. "Thinking of them in a new context" means to reconsider. And as considerations are polar, and considering is the means by which a brain directs formation of its connections, reconsidering creates a new consideration structure, and changes the understanding and meaning of the memory, re-making it as something new. It is a case of 'If one, then not the other'. But in Reason, all things are.

But to consider memories to their positive resolution, sufficient dopamine will be required - and without sufficient dopamine, this work cannot be accomplished in a human brain. And the more dopamine that is available, the easier this work becomes. How long it takes is relative to how much dopamine a person has access to, and whether there is any interference from doctors, scientists, government, police.

And as considerations are polar, as soon as a brain is saturated enough with dopamine, while restraining adrenaline, then those considerations are, of their own accord, going to start considering towards their positive resolution. And this is why I've said that cocaine can be used very effectively to cure PTSD, which is also a mental stress / dopamine deficiency ailment. But each mental stress ailment also involves matters of consideration, because the stress is the difficulty in moving considerations towards their positive resolution.



ii.

If I look for it, there are multiple articles written every day to which I know the answers and truth of. And even if I don't look, sometimes there are still multiple articles that come across my view, regarding research which those working on it don't understand, or are taking in a direction that doesn't lead to the truth. And all these people are studying things for which they've already made themselves ineligible to solve, by starting out by insisting on determinations which falsify the path of considering towards their truths.

The considerations that are considered through a determination that has been given the evaluation of True will be flipped in their polarities, and they will be leading a person towards falsehood regarding the matter that is being considered.

I have solved mental stress,  all the ailments which come from it, and I've also known the truth of mental health, and much beyond. No schooling was required, no funding, and no research teams. These matters were plain and straight-forward, and only needed someone to look at them without bias in their sight, and without personal reward as their motivation.



iii.

Anyone who has a mental stress / dopamine deficiency ailment only received that ailment because a) their consideration structure was vulnerable to incoming considerations b) the determinations of sociopaths are horrendously in-efficient to consider, because they don't evaluate as true, and all the disparities between their disparate parts need to be fully considered, before the matter is resolved, and c) all that considering requires dopamine to accomplish, and without sufficient dopamine, those matter cannot be considered, and they wreak havoc within a brain by imposing False determinations upon the work that the brain is doing. All mental stress is preventable, and curable, through considering, along with the dopaminergic effect of cocaine - but pharmaceutical medications will not work, because they are criminally inadequate in their dopaminergism, and they deliver a very non-healthy dopamine : adrenaline ratio, being inherently designed to capitalize on the existence of people's suffering, and not to move them towards resolution of their suffering.

A person only continues to have a mental stress ailment because of doctors, scientists, government, police, who all have teamed up to ensure that these things continue to exist in this world, while they receive False and undeserved positive reputation for their efforts, and are paid for their evil works. All mental stress was a super easy matter to resolve, as everything points perfectly, without contradiction anywhere, to just one answer. The issue behind mental stress ailments has not been immediately those ailments, but has been the sociopathism existing in the doctors, scientists, government, and police, who have invested their sentiments into a delusion, and who profit off of participating in that sociopathic abomination.



iv.

Jesus called the Pharisees of his day hypocrites, blind guides, and accused them "You strain out a gnat but swallow a camel."

It is also the case with today's doctors, who seek their sense of reward, which they achieve by believing they've adhered to a set of peer-approved determinations, and which is only a freeing up of dopamine, a person's natural cocaine, in response to them preventing their brain from considering the truth.

And while considerations are polar, and lead on in considering of the greater truth, determinations make a person blind to all considerations beyond the determination, which is a falsehood. And so a person who builds themselves upon determinations cannot see the truth, or enter into the truth. They will die because of their determinations, which is their non-willingness to consider the truth. But a person whose considerations lead into the truth will become a ring of truth, and will live forever.

And, like Jesus said "You strain out a gnat but swallow a camel", showing how merely for show, and for a self-gratifying sense of propriety all that the Pharisees did was, in causing great wrong for the sake of the tiniest good, so it is with all of the mental health treatments in this world's existence today: Sociopaths are responsible for the persistence of mental stress ailments, and then they address them with extreme inefficiency and False thinking.

Just as the "war on drugs" has been lost by those waging it every day since its inception, with drugs being victorious over them every day since its inception, so it is with institutional medicine's war against the truth of mental health, stress, dopamine, cocaine.



v.

Why are the people, who have entered into a False doctrine that has been responsible for the disguised murder of hundreds of millions of innocent people over the previous century, paid to perpetuate their falsehoods?

Dressing in a uniform, working in a sterilized environment, receiving lots of peer support, having grants, a big salary, a positive social reputation... none of these things make a person good. It is only being good that makes a person good - and none of the people who have evaluated themselves by doing those things previously listed, are good. They and their influence in this world have been as evil as any - they've only been pretending, while acting out a sociopathic fantasy. The Nazi army is responsible for less death and suffering than Western doctors and institutional medicine, which have not yet been willing to consider the truth ahead of making determinations on what they want it to be, for their own personal exploitation and 'Reward'-pandering - which itself is the release of natural cocaine, and the very thing government, scientists, doctors, police, have prevented from being available in the brains of those who are in need of it.

And in this, those groups are like what Jesus said to the Pharisees of his day: "Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You are like whitewashed tombs, which look beautiful on the outside but on the inside are full of the bones of the dead and everything unclean."


And as I've been saying, I still know everything more.

Shrapnel

Article: I told the truth in my sister's obituary, so that others might choose to live (One Way Dopamine Deficiency Can Kill)

I told the truth in my sister's obituary, so that others might choose to live

i.

To be honest, it wasn't depression that lied to this girl and caused her death, but it was doctors, scientists, and government who lied to her and caused her death. Her death, and the state which provoked it, was entirely preventable, in full, simply by sufficiently increasing the released dopamine within her brain to the level that the work her brain was trying to perform required, while simultaneously inhibiting adren/noradren. She is one of hundreds of millions who have been killed by the falsehoods which doctors, scientists, and government have created, and which they base their conduct upon. The truth would have saved all of their lives.



ii.

From the article:

"I felt like I was in a vacuum in the middle of space with everything I knew being pulled away from me."

This refers to the sister of the girl who endured depression, and not to the depressed girl herself, but it is a bit of the same experience the depressed girl may have felt. Once the sister was faced with a worrying situation, with many things to be considered, the strain on her dopamine availability would have skyrocketed. Her brain would become clogged up with unfinished processes as there would become less and less dopamine to connect considerations with, to produce sense of meaning, purpose, knowing, control, and future sight.

Similarly, as her sister continued on in her dopamine deficiency-induced depressive state, every one of her considerations, represented as synaptic connections within her brain, experienced meaningless when it could not connect to others. And when they all questioned 'Why', they could hear no answer. And the culmination of their loss of hope for life resulted in her own death.

iii.

Also from the article:

"After what seemed like an eternity, the police officers told me plainly: "Aletha is dead." What followed that stark statement was a sudden moment of lucidity in which only one thing mattered: the truth."

The truth is the only thing that mattered before, and knowing it would have seen her never be at risk succumbing to depression. Depression is an artificial and contrived ailment, created by obstructing access to sufficient dopamine within a person's brain.

Dopamine provides the difference between a person's considerations working upwards or falling downwards; between them increasing in inter-connectivity that strengthens a sense of support, and them losing association and all their qualities of hope and meaning dissipating; between a mind growing in clear-lit sightedness, or fading into darkness.

This girl died because nobody let her engage the truth of her brain. It is as if everyone were to tell a person that water was bad for them, that it would kill them, and that they should just ignore the symptoms of dehydration - and so they do, and then they suffer in perpetual agony until they die. Though dehydration would leave them only suffering for weeks until they died, whereas dopamine deficiency would keep a person suffering for years, and suffering every bit just as intensely, and with the possibility for lot more.

iv.

Again, from the article:

"Depression stole decades of our lives together. Depression lies. I have to tell the truth."

No, depression tells the truth. All those things the article says that she thought she was hearing from her depression, they were the considerations which institutional medical doctrine delivered to her, and her brain was considering the truthful meaning of them.

The negative considerations that she experienced in her depression was what the situation truthfully adds up to. A person is only in such a state because their brain is not being provided the dopamine which is required for the amount of work that is being submitted to it, and which it is trying consider to resolution. 

A person's brain is also a living being, and the various areas of a brain, and have their own awarenesses, which they are eager to share with the person the body belongs to, if they are considered into one. A brain's work is considering, and that work needs dopamine to handle. The needed dopamine could be provided, and it is rightful for it to be provided. So why wasn't it provided?:

Is she not worth it? Is there something wrong with her? Is she less than other people? Didn't she like the good things her brain was considering for her? Is her brain defective and incorrect in thinking that the things its trying to resolve are good to resolve? Is there a problem somewhere in her considering (and this will cause many more considerings to commence) Did she hate her brain? Is her brain unworthy in her sight? Did her brain do something wrong? What did she do wrong?

These are all logical and reasonable things for a brain to wonder when it is not being supplied with the dopamine it is deserving of. Ultimately, her lack of dopamine added up to meaning that her life must not be valuable and of worth. By being squarely responsible for the environment that means these considerations, that is what scientists told her, what doctors told her, what government told her, and what the society formed by these harmful people told her. And all that her brain wanted, and rightfully deserved, was dopamine.

Depression was her brain pleading with her to supply it the dopamine it needed to handle and resolve the work it was trying to accomplish. Depression was her brain knowing that it was giving its full self the considering of perfection within her, like her own Jesus, and despite giving absolutely everything to her, she wasn't giving it the one thing it needed to make everything good for them together, as one life. Her brain would have experienced the confusion and desperation of a child being mercilessly suffocated by a parent who they fully loved and had given their full self to serve.

This girl died explicitly for the sake of the prejudices of highly sociopathic, society-deceiving, and self-rewarding doctors, and scientists, and for the sake of their century of lies. She died so that doctors could tell themselves they are good dogs when they feed the lies of institutional medicine to society, causing a shutting-down of considering in doctor's brain once they convince themselves that they are in the right, causing a stream of dopamine to free up within their brains, giving them a "reward"-high . That release of dopamine was not rightfully theirs, and they are undeserving of it. That release of dopamine was stolen from Aletha and millions of others. It was the dopamine that Aletha needed to live, which was taken from her for the self-servingness of doctors, and scientists, and all those that uphold institutional medicine.

This girl was liquidated by doctors and scientists. And contrary to the outward expressions they would make, the doctors and scientists wouldn't have it any other way - and a century of their arrogance didn't have it any other way.

Depression didn't lie to her, because depression was her brain considering the truth of what was happening. But the society formed doctors, scientists, and government lied to her, and had conditioned her to ignore the things that fundamentally mattered - to ignore the desperate pleas and needs of her most special and intimate friend, the one that works perfectly to help create her meaning, potential, success, happiness, dreams...

And by saying that depression lies, guilt is being shifted from where it belongs, which is at the feet of doctors, who are the perpetrators of lies, and to where it doesn't belong - which is, at best, a figment, and at worst, accusing one's own truth-considering mind of being dishonest for wondering the things that the false considerations of doctors truthfully add up to.



v.

And again, from the article:

"The lies of depression can exist only in isolation. Brought out into the open, lies are revealed for what they are."

Isolation is what happens to considerations in a brain when there isn't dopamine enough for them to connect with other considerations to the extent that they can form reasons, together. A lone consideration has no value, no purpose, and no truth. It is reason that lets a consideration enter into all of those things. And dopamine is reason for that connectivity within a brain. Dopamine is truth to a brain's capability to consider. Without it, a consideration falls into darkness. And as life is the movement created by considering, which is one consideration giving itself to another, when a consideration becomes isolated, it dies.

From the article:

"Here is the truth: You have value. You have worth. You are loved. Trust the voices of those who love you. Trust the enormous chorus of voices that say only one thing: You matter. "

Reason's primary principle: Everything necessarily means every else. If the above statements are true, then a brain is worthy of the dopamine it is made to have, and which its work is accomplished by. And if a brain is refused that dopamine, and if a brain is told it is right that it is not being delivered that dopamine, then the above statement can not be true, and everything about the brain's existence will confirm this - because a brain is made to have plenty of dopamine, and dopamine is meant to be available within a brain.

If the above quoted statements are true, then a person must allow its brain the dopamine which is essential to its growth and good health, and to its worthy comfort, and which is a belonging part of it having value, worth, and of being loved. A truth-considering brain cannot be fooled - so long as it is denied the dopamine it needs, it will know that something is missing, and its work will suffer. Otherwise, its considerations will die until it is working beneath its dopamine availability's headroom. But a person is their considerations, and to let them die is to let aspects of the person die. And if some aspects of the person are let to die, then why not the others? And by what authority or arrogance does one or some considerations elects others of the same body to die, while they live? Life is all, or nothing, and institutional medicine is explicitly telling those with mental stress that their lives are not valued by doctors, scientists, and government, other than to serve as their lucrative livestock.

vi.

Teenagers are particularly vulnerable to dopamine deficiency / mental stress because of all the additional work that their brains are performing at this time of heightened development, and consequently, teenage years are among the most valuable for a person to boost their dopamine levels, to fortify the robustness of that development, so that their mind and body will be at its strongest for the rest of their lives.

Other key areas of life that are prime periods for boosting available dopamine availability are during a woman's pregnancy, and also post-childbirth for a woman, and also any other area where a person encounters troubling mental stress, and stress in general.

That stress is a person's brain's workload exceeding the headroom which its available dopamine grants them, and raising available dopamine will raise the headroom that is their brain's healthy work capacity. And doing so will avoid all harms that come from a workload's exceeding of dopamine levels straining a brain and body.

Prevention is the best attitude, and ultimately is the only responsible and reality-based approach.



vii.

Institutional medicine is a lethal racketeering scheme, and doctors are just those stupid, inexperienced, and sociopathic enough to be the oblivious or willing middle-people to pull it off, and who receive benefit for it: Clowns whose entire self-assuredness rests, not in knowing anything, but in sensing authority as existing in the appearance of a peer consensus. They are highly-functional, particularly with fact-memorization, due to having plentiful dopamine-availability, which is due to their being little considering, and due to them constantly issuing themselves the considering-avoiding determination that they're good dogs because they parrot a peer-approved set of things.

Shrapnel

Article: Mental illness mostly caused by life events not genetics, argue psychologists

Article: Mental illness mostly caused by life events not genetics, argue psychologists


To be specific, there are two root causes of mental illness: socipathism, which is the lack of consideration of the truth, and mental stress, which is the lack of released dopamine to handle the workload of considering that a brain is trying to do. And so the mental illness indicated by that above linked-to article is caused by the impact that life events have on a person's dopamine availability. With sufficient dopamine availability, a person will be able to rise above every challenging event.

That overcoming is a brain considering the meaning of every consideration which is a part of the event which a person encountered. And having greater dopamine availability won't change the amount of work which is to be done, but will make every workload weigh less and be handled with greater ease, and in less discomfort.

And genes are outputs of considering, which is the work of a brain that requires dopamine to do, and which suffers when a brain hasn't enough dopamine availability to perform it - and that suffering is then expressed in all the outputs of the processes which had to work without sufficient dopamine. And it is the false doctrines of reward-seeking sociopaths that has created the influences in society which are to blame for the continued existence and prevalence of mental health issues.



It's incredible that however many people (scientists, doctors, psychologists, etc...) have spent 100 years accomplishing absolutely nothing but an endless wild-goose chase of their own preferred determining.

A bunch of dopamine-plentiful people determined that it was better that any number of dopamine deficient people be tortured their whole lives, in pain, unhappiness and despair, conceding experience and opportunity, endlessly enduring agonizing stress and anxiety... all of it just because the dopamine-plentiful people found it preferential to their own comfort and position in society. Those people have been no different than slave owners whose entire fortunes were built on the backs of exploitation of others, and who would not give up their slaves, but would forcefully argue against the abolition of slavery - and they are still doing it.

Keeping dopamine deficiency states in society lets doctors and their ilk pretend that they're deserving of their reputation, their incomes, their self-determined "rewards"... but none of it is true. They are the most dishonourable of people, and their whole state in life has been built upon a lie, fraud, the undetected genocide of innocents and the most vulnerable. Everything that any doctor has ever judged a drug user of being all applies to doctors, themselves: They are in denial of reality, they harm others in pursuit of their goal, their ideology is selfish and only serving of them, they steal from people (their very lives), they cheat people (of their very mind, good health, and again lives)... they are acting out a sociopathic fantasy, and like bumbling idiots pretending that they are anything at all representing good.



This is what a doctor really is the custodian of:
Nixon official: real reason for the drug war was to criminalize black people and hippies

All modern institutional approach to drugs and health treatment is rooted in false and contrived drug propaganda, and is, itself, propaganda. And when governments, whose prerogative has been to use scare tactics to keep people away from looking at criminalized substances objectively, controls drug research licensing, and when pharmaceutical companies, who make their profit from inferior medications, fund the drug research that's available while also lobbying governments, and when a doctor’s greatest qualification for their job is precisely that they have no experience but are dopamine-rich due to being little-considering, what do you think that the expectable outcome from drug research and application will be?

The lie has been too sweet for doctors to pass up. They tell themselves that they deserve the things which that lie promised them, having jumped through the hoops of medical school, having not engaged in all the things they made harsh and harmful judgements against others for doing... they tell themselves that their placement in the lie is their "reward" - and they seek that reward more than they seek to do good for others. That reward, by their own labelling, is a release of dopamine within their brains. And so, in the end, they've been nothing but crack addicts, leeching off society and doing it harm for the purpose of trying to instil as much sense of that "reward" inside of themselves as they can. And their determinations in pursuit of this shut shuts down their considering, leading there to be much dopamine to fuel their depravity. And their depravity is that they have turned a falsehood into trillion-dollar industries, and that their whole livelihoods are built upon the liquidation of the lives of others, under pretence of helping them.

As Jesus said, no person can serve two masters: Either they will love one and hate the other, or vice versa. This is the same as what I said: For all things there is an ordering of considerations. And the final consideration will flip the polarity of all those that came before it and did not acknowledge it. A person who is reward-oriented is not truth-oriented, and a person who serves their own reward will hate the truth, because the truth says that their self-determined reward doesn't exist in the truth: There is no reward for the truth - the truth is, and there is no other. And Reason will flip the polarity of the entire world so that the truth may present in it once again.

Shrapnel

A Crash-Course in the Basics for Truth-Based Human Health Treatment

Dopamine, serotonin, adrenaline, opioids, cannabinoid receptors, GHB receptors... from the day a human is born, even for one that's in their mother's womb, their brain is an ongoing drug bath. And all human experience and productivity are achieved and expressed through the manipulation of drug levels in a person's brain.

i.

Some most basic understanding that is essential for a person to be capable of compassionately and successfully treating people of their stress / dopamine deficiency ailments is as follows:

a)

Dopamine is the means by which a brain does all the work that is considering, which is the work by which a brain and its person develops, learns, memorizes, recalls, decides, etc, and is work that the rest of the body's health is subject to. A person's potential and successes are subject to their brain's access to released and available dopamine:

- Work is only possible for a person and brain in an environment of having enough dopamine for it, and dopamine levels are what form a person's head-room for their work potential: More dopamine equates to a greater work potential, while less dopamine equates to less work potential.

- The weight of any body of work, and the effort required for it from a particular person, is entirely relative to the amount of released dopamine which a person has within themselves: It is possible for something which has a work weight value of +5 to a person of high dopamine availability, to have a work weight value of +500, or greater, to a person of low dopamine availability.

- Lower dopamine means that a brain isn't able to connect as much information at one time, and must address work in piecemeal, rather than in its entirety at once, or using larger concepts.

- Lower dopamine exposes a person's brain and body to greater affliction by keeping the brain in a continuous state of trying to catch up on work, without allowing it reach resolution of work so that it could implement the meaning of its resolutions in ways which create solid foundations for the mental and physical environment, and fortify them against detected vulnerabilities.

- Also, lower dopamine means that a brain isn't able to access larger concepts, such as the concept of a particular objective. Concepts are formed by connecting considerations, and that connecting is reliant on dopamine availability. The more dopamine that can be allocated, the greater number of considerations can be held in positive connection, and worked with simultaneously.

This means that a person's capability to overcome matters, such as emotional, mental, and physical, is relative to the released and available dopamine which they have in their brain. What seems a straight-forward and easily doable matter to a dopamine-plentiful person can appear like an insurmountable mountain to a person with low dopamine availability. And what is easy and straight-forward for a person with lots of dopamine availability is extremely more difficult, and less certain, even impossible, for a person with notably less dopamine availability.


A lot of people with high dopamine availability misjudge their worth by basing their assessment on outward appearance of their accomplishments and productivity relative to the general populace, without ever being aware that many of the people they judge as least motivated, productive, and ambitious, are exerting greater than 50x the effort each day, while accomplishing very little, compared to many of the people who are the greatest achievers by outward appearance. 

And those who are greater achievers are such only by way of having greater dopamine released within their brains, which many of them have precisely because they are less willing to consider fairly and truthfully, but instead make determinations which cater to their pre-existing prejudices, and which serve to establish 'reward' for themselves.

Having the dopamine for work makes it possible, easier, and desirable to accomplish more. Often, a person's sense of visible accomplishment causes them to feel more entitled to good things than those who accomplish little in the eyes of society. They do this because they sought to justify themselves by their determinations - but no one is justified by their determinations, and rather are justified or non-justified according to the consideration by which their works are done, in the sight of all truth.

As said by Jesus: "I tell you the truth, this poor widow has given more than all the others who are making contributions. For they gave a tiny part of their surplus, but she, poor as she is, has given everything she had to live on."

So it is often the case between those who accomplish visibly little, and those who achieve many things for themselves. And many who are doctors, scientists, entrepreneurs, etc, are in fact the most lazy, self-justifying, and entitled-feeling in all society.

b)

“Sober” is a context-dependent term, and ultimately there is no such thing as a sober human being, because all human experience and exertion is manifested through the constant manipulation of all the things which both legal and criminalized drugs equally manipulate within every human's brain. Human life is a drug-fuelled experience, and the only truly sober human is a dead human.

c)

"High" is a relative term: Say the typical scholastic achiever experiences a standard dopamine level of +40, while someone with a depression, or a psychosis, or anxiety has a vastly lower standard dopamine experience level, say +2, or as low as -40. If a person with a severe state of mental stress were to suddenly be in the brain and body of a scholastic achiever, it would feel to them exactly the same as if they were on a large dose of cocaine. But to each person, their standard dopamine experience level gives them their familiarity, from which they shape their expectations and beliefs surrounding what human life is.

That level is quantifiable by the amount of released dopamine a person has relative to the amount of work which their brain is trying to accomplish. The work which a brain is trying to accomplish is not visible by outward appearance, as a brain which is engaging more work than it has dopamine for will throttle, and become stuck. And the experience to the person will be as though they are stagnant, like they don't know what they think or feel about things, and like they can't reach what they sense within their own mind. And their outward appearance can be anything, often appearing as though non-motivated or lazy, when in fact their brain simply doesn't have the dopamine to press upward against the weight of the work that is sitting in its pipelines.

d)

Even though people from all dispositions use a term of stress at various times to describe their state, it is referring to completely distinct considerations, depending upon whom it is being spoken by. A person for whom a +10 dopamine experience level is their consistent normal, will call experiencing a temporary reduction to a +5 dopamine experience level as stress, while a person for whom a +40 dopamine experience level is normal, someone like a typical doctor, will call their exposure to mere +30 dopamine experience level "stressful", and start to expect all kinds of pampering and become unwilling to exert themselves further on anyone's behalf except for their own.

And then, quite often, that doctor will unflinchingly suggest, opine, or assert that someone who feels hopeless and and undeserving of help from people while they are stuck in dopamine experience level of -5, which is the only experience they know of, is an abuser of drugs, which, when they use, might only elevate their dopamine experience level to a mere +2. The real abuse of drugs in these instances is the doctor using their dopamine to impose a false, hypocritical, and harmful determination upon a person who is innocent of what they are accused of.

And, further, doctors will place all kinds of burdens upon the most destitute of people, for them to pursue as their treatment, which they would never consider subjecting themselves to, if the relative work weight were put forth before them. They would balk at it, aghast, as if the proposition were monstrously inhumane and completely irreverent of their person.

As an example, think of the eye-opener of simulated extreme labour pains that some women feel, being given to men. Likewise, doctors have no experience to reference that would make them capable assessors of what is appropriate for mental stress ailment sufferers to be treated with. People are only able to succeed scholastically, to possibly become doctors, due to having a level of dopamine released and available within their brains that makes them entirely virgin and non-relating to the experiences of those suffering mental stress ailments. A doctor has typically never come even close to conceiving what the reality is for people with dopamine deficiency - and their doctrines surrounding dopamine and mental stress treatment are direct reflections of their lack of comprehension and qualification.

The doctors of today, whose doctrine is self-aggrandizing and serves them far more than those they impose it upon, fulfill the role of the Pharisees in Jesus' day: "For they bind heavy burdens, which are grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers."

So, what constitutes as a "high" to a person with a low standard dopamine experience level is actually viewed as a state of stress to one with a high standard dopamine experience level. A scholastically-achieving person, without any mental stress, is very 'high' 24/7, relative to a person suffering a mental stress ailment. But to both of them, their experience will be the only one that they are familiar with, and this leads to people from all dispositions using the same terms while meaning entirely incompatible concepts, without them realizing it.

ii.

Whenever a doctor tells a person that drugs are not an answer, or not a good answer, it is a tell-tale sign that that doctor is the typical institutional fact-regurgitating hack, and has no truthful connectivity in their brain between the considerations which their perceived facts bear upon one another.

Even when counselling is an answer, even when taking a walk is an answer, even when taking a few days of rest is an answer, drugs are still an inalienable part of all those answers, due to the impacts those things have on the drug levels in the person's brain: Directly or indirectly, drugs are a part of the answer.

The human brain is a massive drug bath, and a human will not get from state A to state B apart from engaging a manipulation of the drugs swilling in their brain. And while it can be laborious, long-term, and possibly futile to get that manipulation through available indirect avenues, the same difference can be fulfilled in moments, or in a relatively short period of time, by directly engaging the brain’s drug adjustment requirements.

Drugs are never an answer all on their own, as they supply a brain with its needed considerations to do its work, but they are always a part of the answer, perhaps even the only part that is missing, as they serve to enable and facilitate movement towards the considerations that mean a person’s complete healing – which is movement that is largely unavailable and non-manageable for a person apart from extraneous drug use, as is made evident by the fact that mental stress ailments actually still exist in society after over 100 years of their scientific study.

If doctors can convince people that drugs are not the answer, or not a good answer, then they set themselves up as benefactors to profit off of people’s perpetual illnesses, because drugs are always going to be a primary component to every human health answer. And the people who are convinced that drugs are not an answer are going to perpetually require assistance so long as they avoid the root causes of their issue.

If a person doesn't like having cracked lips, a dry throat, a head-ache, or discomfort permeating their entire body due to dehydration, their options are to either drink water to prevent and resolve those unfavourable conditions, or otherwise endure the outcomes of being insufficiently hydrated. Like-wise, if a person doesn't like having depression, anxiety, psychosis, schizophrenia, bi-polarity, and doesn't like being vulnerable to PTSD, alzheimer's, parkinson's, and a host of other dopamine deficiency-emergent ailments... and also if they also don't like having their potential in life bottle-necked, and them never reaching the level of accomplishment which they see and know is possible, then they can either take control of, and learn to become responsible for their brain and body's natural dynamic dopamine requirements, or otherwise endure the outcomes of not having sufficiently accepted, or tended to their body's fundamental dopamine needs.

A person does not enter into those non-favourable states, apart from having less than optimally tended to their dopamine and consideration needs.

iii.

As I have said, those who call themselves doctors and scientists have done all things wrong. Scientists mock homeopathy and other “new-age” approaches as being fantasy, and call them harmful by way of causing a person to not seek more appropriate health treatment - but doctors and scientists espouse and perform all the exact same air-headedness when they tell and attempt to convince people that drugs are not an answer, or not the answer, or not a good answer. And when scientists and doctors do so, they commit the far greater offence, because, in an act of mental abuse, and in arrogance, they impose their harmful and ignorant determinations upon others, rather than simply exercising domain over their own body by making those choices for themselves.

The only reason a doctor is even in the position to be able to try to convince another person to not view drugs as a solution (though they assuredly have always been) is because the doctor already has enough of the same drugs released available in their brain to keep them out of the afflicted states of the people they might say such things to. So, anyone telling another human that drugs are not an answer is firstly telling that person an ignorant and harmful falsehood, but is also being an egregious hypocrite, as much as there ever was.

No human ever resolved a health issue apart from the engagement drugs, because the physical human body is drug-based, and a continual orgy of drugs for as long as it remains alive - and its life is dependent upon it.

iv.

By the way, considering is movement, and anything which engages consideration is provoking movement, and changing the form of a state – and the difference between any two states is a defined set of considerations. And the state of consideration in a person is the state of their brain-wiring, which directs health or sickness, which delivers capacity to overcome or vulnerability. When a person receives the necessary consideration to improve their state via something that may be classified as homeopathy, or new-age, which they would not have otherwise engaged, then that homeopathy or new-ageness thing would have indeed served as cure. The extent to which this can be productive has never been known by institutional medicine, but everything unfurls into consideration, and there are no limits to what can be done via considering.

But the ability for a human brain to consider exists in an environment of it having ample dopamine availability.

Shrapnel

There is No Such Thing as Too Much Dopamine as an Ailment

i.

Serving as an example of another perfect inaccuracy in medical attribution, there exist recommendations of lowering dopamine to deal with certain behavioural issues, such as impulsive behaviour, including addiction - neither of which are caused by having too much dopamine, but by the connectivity of a brain having considered in a manner, or been collapsed into a manner, which guides behaviour down such avenues. The high dopamine is caused by the low consideration - and not the impulsiveness (which is a product of low consideration) caused by high dopamine.

Diverting attention from the actual root causes of those behaviours, which is the consideration that guides them, to dopamine, has deadly repercussions for millions of people around the world, and creates an atmosphere of ignorance that prevents truthful physiological understanding arising so that and real and positive resolutions can be had.

ii.

Considering is the work of a brain that requires dopamine, and which forms the connections in a brain that guide a person's behaviour - and well-considered connectivity is what normalizes a brain.

A person who has reduced normalization in their brain by making determinations can be vulnerable to impulsive tendencies, and may also have a surplus of dopamine availability from reducing the amount of work their brain is doing. The issue there isn't too much dopamine, but a lack of connection-forming consideration to make use of the dopamine that's available - and this state is called being a sociopath / psychopath.

When a person has impulsive tendencies (which can occur where there is dopamine deficiency as well), the sickness is not the dopamine that is available, but the manner in which the person has considered their mind. Dopamine doesn't make a person impulsive anyway - it is what gives a person all their control over their mind, and their potential for the mental work that is considering. And what they consider will develop the pathway that will guide their behaviours.

It is not justified, or appropriate to blame dopamine availability for particular people's behaviour, and then restrict everyone's access to dopamine so that hundreds of millions of mental stress sufferers are tortured and exploited, just so that sociopaths and psychopaths do not need to admit to and confront their personal flaws and selfishness.

As it is, the people with the problems inside of themselves are the ones designating institutional ailments and treatments. They're saying that any number of innocent people need to suffer and be denied their deserved cure, so that they can continue being well-comforted while playing out a facade.

In an act of ultimate irresponsibility, they are imposing the penalty of their own guilt onto people who have done nothing wrong. And they profit heavily as the main benefactors from the torture it causes those people, both financially, and in ill-gained reputations within society as carers of people - whose problems they are the cause of, as well as obstructions to the needed cure, as if profiteering off the suffering of others is the sociopath's reward for ensuring that the suffering persists.

Now that I have elucidated the matter and corrected the attribution of fault in an impulsive person from dopamine to a lack of sound consideration, there is no longer justification for withholding the proper treatment from those who need it. Sociopaths need to learn to consider, and people with mental stress need powerful dopamine increases.

iii.

If a person has impulsive tendencies, then it isn't directly because of dopamine in any way. Though if a person has allowed pathways to consider which cause impulsiveness, having dopamine available will have a role in helping enable those pathways to be engaged. But having dopamine available is also what will enable it to be corrected by considering - a person cannot make one change in their brain, for good or bad, apart from having available dopamine.

Addressing an issue by clamping down dopamine is only masking the problem, and is not addressing it at its root. And thinking of dopamine reduction as a tool to avoid the problem has very harmful, including deadly consequences for millions of people who require increased dopamine to be healthy and in control of their lives.

Decreasing dopamine is not a solution to anything, and is running away from personal responsibility. And it is only even conjectured to be a solution because those who suggest it are only personally familiar with having a consistent high level of dopamine, and with no alternate experience to contrast their own with, they are left egregiously unfamiliar with dopamine's actual effect and importance - and this makes the things that they propose and impose on other people based in ignorance and hypocrisy.

A person who is familiar with dopamine is not going to choose to lower it to address any specific problem, because lowering it will reduce the capability and quality of a great many things. Lowering dopamine only stands a chance to reduce impulsive behaviour by reducing work potential of a brain enough so that there's no extra capability to engage considerations further than basic awareness. Awareness itself will be decreased, as will positive experience of senses, critical thinking capability, creative expression, visual depth perception, aural articulation, energy, and more.

Lowering dopamine lowers a person's capability to experience, perceive, and engage life, and lowering dopamine to address a particular behavioural problem would be like a person responding to having a messy home by having their sight, smell, and touch disabled so that they don't encounter their messy home's unpleasantness, rather that tending to the mess by cleaning it up.

Lowering dopamine is avoiding a problem, rather than dealing with it, and it is a selfish approach because it also encourages the continued victimization of many people who are being denied the dopamine they fundamentally require to be healthy, and to experience and enjoy life.

Shrapnel

Adendum - Migraines are Dopamine Deficiency - and also: The Importance of Tact in Dopaminergic Application - and also: The Importance of Considering the Truth

Related post: Just a Tip (Regarding news of genetic mutations being responsible for such or such a condition)


i.

Oh, and it should go without saying, but migraines are also a product of there being insufficient dopamine for a brain to handle work that is processing through it, and, yes, sufficiently increasing dopamine availability relative to other things will alleviate a migraine - but try to not also increase adrenaline and noradrenaline at the same time, because that would be counter-productive, and could exacerbate part of the migraine.

To do this is to treat the dopamine deficiency symptom at its root and source. To do anything other is to either be in denial of one's real problem, or to be self-spiting of one's own human being.

The pain of a migraine is a part of a brain's voice, and it is crying in anguish precisely for dopamine, which it essentially needs. Does a person ignore a baby that is screaming in pain if there is some anomaly afflicting it? Why would they act so inhumanely towards their very own brain, leaving it in a state of torture while it tries to do good work for the person? Such is an ultimate irresponsibleness and self-spitefulness. A person who cannot come to grips with the state of being a human is not worthy of being one, and is a danger to themselves, and a harmful influence within society.



ii.

But in all dopaminergic application, tact is all-mattering. Robin Williams, someone who endured various dopamine deficiency ailments, and took cocaine, and yet in the end wasn't helped by it, would be a text-book example of how not to pursue dopaminergism, if the knowledge to develop an understanding of these things to be put into a book had been pursued by any in the previous century, instead of engaging the quintessential sociopathic conduct of insisting sentiment-base determinations to people, to lying to people about the nature of dopamine and dopaminergics and building walls of propaganda and indoctrinating doctors using institutional falsehoods to turn them into agents of fallacy.

Robin Williams could have straight-forwardly been cured of his Parkinson's, anxiety, and depression using cocaine. He, too, was a victim of institutional misinformation on drugs, and of those who perpetuate that misinformation.

One of the most essential things to avoid in dopaminergic application is any sense that it is wrong to take these drugs, however a person feels they would like to take them. Regardless of whether a person harbours insecurities about increasing their dopamine, their brain still fundamentally depends on, and operates on dopamine. When a person is insecure about taking cocaine, or other dopaminergic, which is only from a century of false messaging by doctors, scientists, and government, that uncertainty and worry is a belief held by consideration, which is represented as synaptic connections within their brain.

Considerations have polarity, and receive their identity as relative to one another. And such a belief aligns certain considerations in a negative manner, and for as long as it evaluates as True towards the activity a person is engaging in, all signals relating to that activity will pass through that consideration, and receive an antagonistic influence, a quantum of negative consideration-value, which can infect the whole mind. And increasing adrenaline and noradrenaline will accelerate the considering of those things that are worries, and progressively amplify the presence of negative consideration-value in the brain until a time when things settle down and they can be reconsidered into normalcy. This is where drug-induced anxiety and psychosis come from - there is nothing inherent in the drugs taken themselves that cause these things, but it is a contagion created by doctors, scientists, and government, out of their sociopathic inclinations to attempt to justify their own statuses by demeaning and harming those of others, who they deem as targets for their prejudice.



iii.

All anti-drug propaganda bears a negative consideration-value within society, and the accrued negative consideration-value in society because of the previous century of anti-drug propaganda is tremendous, and it has killed many people, and has destroyed many families.

Despite its awful influence in society, every human being's brain and body still fundamentally runs on the things people have been taught to be scared by - and much unfortunate drug behaviour is no different than a you girl who is abused by their parents, being told she's a worthless slut who won't amount to anything, growing up to become a promiscuous and alcoholic vagrant (though these individual activities, if done within their control and awareness, and by their own choosing, would not be wrong). Such a person is not a statement against the harms of the alcohol or drugs they may use, but delivers an indictment against those who delivered to her the hateful messaging which considered through her, shaping the neurological pathways that guide her behaviour.

It is the same with negative drug usage patterns in society - none of them were caused by drugs, themselves, but were created by scientists, doctors, and governments, who then profit from their existence, and use them as false-justification to further the messaging that created them in the first place.

In the end, the Truth itself will require there to be full justice for those who were unfairly subjected to and manipulated by anti-drug propaganda, and who received mistreatment at the hands of those those who peddled that propaganda.



iv.

Also, ironically, when anti-drug propaganda is being administered to a society, there is a growth in sociopathism within that society, and a reduction in intelligence within that society, and the harms put into children and teenagers are those very ones which anti-drug propaganda would have them think come from drugs: Considering is the mechanism behind evolution, and a brain develops its connections through the course of considering. Those connections themselves represent the considerations of a person's mind, and greater Truth is manifest the more considerations are accounted for within an environment - and considerations which resolve into one form concepts. A determination is like a road-block that prevents considering from occurring - and the more determinations held in a mind, the less presence of truth there is in that mind, and the more selfish and sociopathic it is likely to be.

Anti-drug propaganda is not based in truth, but in sentiment-based determinations, disseminated and practised by truth-lacking sociopaths - and its influence is killing of the mind of society, and creating of all kinds of diseases. Conversely, taking many of the drugs anti-drug propaganda frightens people away from commonly greatly improves a healthy development of mind, and fortifies both physical and mental health.

So when anti-drug propaganda told people "this is your brain on drugs", that imagery and message was, in truth, what was being done to the brain of every person who believed that message. While the drugs they were being warned against did and do the opposite - they provide a person with the physio-fuel that makes them healthier, smarter, and more capable for good (though to use it is a person's choice). As I've said, a determination is a falsehood by nature, which reduces consideration (a consideration being a quantum of truth, and a quantum of mind), and which aligns a person's considerations antithetically to the truth.

Doctors and scientist and governments have brain-washed people into being scared of the very thing that cures them - and so they are made to suffer all kinds of artificially-created ailments. But in the end, just as in the beginning, the human brain effectively runs on the effect of cocaine, which is actually literally good by nature. And if a person is encountering an issue within themselves, particularly within their mind, the effect of cocaine would be a reliably good place to start addressing it, as a first recourse. It is good, normal, and healthy for a person to use drugs which they recognize by their own judgement as contributing positively inside of themselves - and no one on the outside is capable of casting a judgement over that.

The Truth is real, and cannot be determined, but can only come to be known by being considered.


Continued in this post: Regarding Cocaine's Applicability for Treating Migraines (2nd Addendum)

Shrapnel

Just a Tip (Regarding news of genetic mutations being responsible for such or such a condition)

You can view this type of news all over the place, and regarding a host of different ailments and conditions:

Genetic mutation 'is responsible for BOTH migraines and IBS'

Genes are an output of considering, and the work that is considering requires dopamine. If something is going wrong in the development and maintenance of a gene, then there was likely an insufficient availability of dopamine to provide the pathways that were relevant to that gene's creation with enough dopamine.

Further, conditions such as anxiety, depression, psychosis, etc, in all their details, are ultimately merely symptoms and expressions of dopamine deficiency.

Modern medicine has taken a falsehood regarding dopamine, that of it being "reward", rather than physio-fuel, and turned it into trillion-dollar industries, as well as a container for their prejudice. Those complicit in this are mass murderers, and those administering this charade and farce, such as doctors, who uphold the forced obsolescence of people, are no different than nazi guards who held posts at death camps during WW2, who, too, believed they were enforcing a righteous paradigm, and were just doing their job and what they were trained for.

When looking at events in history like the Crusades, people often use that as a notation of how many religion has killed. Well, by the same measure, looking at those who have been killed by decades upon decades of corroborated institutional medical science, through defamation of dopamine, it is true to say that those killed by their science in the previous century number in the hundreds of millions, and those victimized by science number in the billions - and therefore more people have been killed in the name of science than in that of any other dogma.

Humans have not yet achieved a more efficient tool of death, suffering, and inequality than the mischaracterizing of dopamine and dopaminergics. And those delivering these false representations are the most proficient of mass murderers in history.



This post is part of a series:

1. Just a Tip (Regarding news of genetic mutations being responsible for such or such a condition)
2.  Adendum - Migraines are Dopamine Deficiency - and also: The Importance of Tact in Dopaminergic Application - and also: The Importance of Considering the Truth
3. Regarding Cocaine's Applicability for Treating Migraines (2nd Addendum)

Shrapnel

Calling Out Research Duplicity and Falsity for What It Is... and some stuff regarding addiction

In the previous post, I said that I'd speak more regarding the matter of institutional duplicity and bias in framing dopamine increases as a health boon when it comes from some sources (coffee, modafinil, etc), while a threat, and "addictive" when it comes from others (basically any non-licensed dopaminergic use), and so I will.



i.

In the article Mice Fed with Cocaine Show Growth in Brain Areas Linked with Learning, Memory, there was speculated and proposed the idea that the same growth in brain regions associated with memory formation and learning that occurs during cocaine use corresponds to drug-seeking behaviour - implying that cocaine guides a brain to form an addiction.

The suggestion wholly ignores the reality that only a small minority of people develop any behavioural habit from cocaine use, fewer than develop habits to many common prescription medications that are prescribed even to children to help them get better grades in elementary school. It also ignores that the same brain growth occurs from caffeine use, and from modafinil use - but in the latter, that growth is praised as healthily boosting a person's smarts, while regarding cocaine the same growth is talking about as if with distrustful paranoia of ill intent.

Cocaine, caffeine, modafinil, and many others, are all dopaminergics, and the reality is that increasing dopamine simply improves a brain's healthy development, including regarding all the efforts that a person puts their focus towards while engaging the dopamine increase. Because cocaine boosts dopamine in a healthier and more proficient manner than both caffeine and modafinil, the amount of brain development that occurs while taking cocaine is more significant than that which occurs while taking caffeine or modafinil, and or doapminergics. Everything said beyond than that is only sentiment, bias, politics, ideology, non-objectiveness.

The basis for the referred-to sentiment and speculation in the above linked-to article is simply an attempt to rationalize and provide a counter-weight against recognizing and publishing an apparent positive about the subject. It is in no way truthful, or objective. It is propaganda, and an offence to the truth, and a betrayal of the greater subject of truthful human physiology and health.

The reality is that dopamine is the means by which a brain accomplishes all work, and when increasing dopamine with a dopaminergic drug, whatever a person puts their focus towards will receive enhanced development. And not only the things that a person consciously puts effort towards, but also subconscious matters. The whole brain will be improved for work. It is through and through a positive, and is the basis for why Modafinil boosts mental capacities – although modafinil does so nowhere near the extent to which cocaine does. As I said, increasing dopamine is like turning a dial up on all a brain’s power and control of thought, its ability to work with more details at once, its experience processing (which is memory formation) to beneficial resolution, and memory recollection, perception of senses, etc.

ii.

The choice to misrepresent a subject is a fairly common impulsive tendency exhibited by those who conduct medical research (and also in doctors) regarding illicit drugs, where interpretations are typically being tapered in a manner to reinforce a pre-determined negative framing of the subject. In other words, authorized research on illicit drugs is typically conclusions in search of data. And this is for a variety of reasons, one of the bigger ones being that consideration is what overlays and forms the structure that is conduit for emotion, and provides mental articulation - but a sociopath lacks consideration. And so instead of considering things, a sociopath is guided by their ambiguous sentiments, and makes blunt determinations based off of them.

And when a person makes determinations, it polarizes their brain even more, to the point that the person can be looking at the same thing, presented under two different labels, and in one presentation, they will deem the thing to be of no harm, and even a positive characteristic of great boon to health and life, while in the other, will deem the same thing to be nefarious and the cause of every minutest problem that can be spoken for in a person’s health and life - or they'll omit, downplay, or dismiss one particular detail regarding pharmaceutical medications, while while egregiously over-hyping the same detail when it appears in a non-licensed medicine.

Yet the thing will have been exactly the same in both presentations. This is what we see happening regarding dopamine being released via cocaine vs being released via coffee, or modafinil, and actually cocaine is significantly healthier than either coffee or modafinil, and is phenomenally greater at increasing a person’s mental capabilities than either coffee or modafinil.

Yet the exampled prejudist and senseless conduct is par for the course when it comes to researching and reporting on illicit drugs, and really has hardly improved since 1936’s reefer madness – the bullshit today is just more subtly presented, being dressed up with a bunch of technical jargon, which itself is a worthless mass of disconnected determinations.

Many hacks and frauds are willing to use and praise modafinil, while spreading deluded sensationalism regarding cocaine, yet the root mechanism in both of them is one and the same: dopamine. And dopamine is not addictive when released by one dopaminergic and then miraculously not addictive when released by another.

Addiction doesn’t even come into play here, and is itself a false concept – both in the instances of so-called “physical addictions” and also “chemical addictions”. When a doctor or scientist refers to these things, they’re tapping into sentiments within themselves, and not truthful understandings. And the various types of so-called treatments for these things reflects the ambiguity of the understanding regarding what these things actually are, where they come from, and why they’re happening.

A major reason why certain dopaminergic drugs becomes more common for impulsive use than others is exactly because of the same reason why advertising sways opinions and leads to consumer uptake. It’s all a result of the messaging chosen and expressed by doctors, scientists, and government. When these sources tell people that a certain thing is addictive, then Reason’s principle applies as the message is considered through the minds of people who don’t know better, and then there will be an uptick in the number of people who develop behavioural habits regarding that certain thing – even if that certain thing actually does nothing itself to create behavioural habits, such as is the case of cocaine.

Yet a minority of people start using cocaine in a habitual way – some of those cases are completely valid, while others are uncontrolled impulsiveness, and the direct product of years of public brainwashing from doctors and governments.

iii.

Consideration is what normalizes a brain and gives structure to emotion, and consideration is what a sociopath is lacks. Consequently, the more sociopathic a person is, the more they are guided by sentiments and the more easily they can be influenced by the power of suggestion.

This is why so many doctors and scientists write and believe things about illicit drugs such as the example I’ve given at the beginning of this post. Doctors and scientists’ efforts of trying to convince people that a lot of various illicit drugs are addictive, when they’re not at all, is also the reason why behavioural habits are as big of issues that they are in present society. Just as telling a person without understanding of the matter that they're addicted will commence connection-forming considering processes within their brain to reason what that means, telling a person a different, better message would also render a different, better influence in society.

But a lot of what doctors and scientists would judge by appearance to be an “addiction” is nothing more than the sensible practicality of a person who lacks dopamine fundamentally needing it - and there’s no way around that, and to try to avoid that is to be in denial of reality, and a hypocrite. The difference in dopamine between a healthy and functional person, and a person suffering mental stress is the ‘why’ for everything regarding the state of the person with mental stress and their behaviours. Just as a person who is dehydrated in a desert needs water, and their feeling is as such, it is no less the case regarding a person who is enduring dopamine deficiency. And the effects of dopamine deficiency within a human body and brain are terrible, and costly, and life-ransoming.

At the root of it all, despite a small minority of people who use cocaine developing behavioural habits for specific and resolvable reasons, cocaine is non-addictive. And it never was addictive, and it can’t be addictive, because its favourable effect is only the greater and healthier release of the very same dopamine which a person’s brain runs on from the day they are born, and which is present in every mental and physical action they make. It is the means by which all a person’s accomplishments are achieved, and is fundamental to their better mental and physical health. 

If what cocaine does is addicting, then every human being is already an addict, and so the term addiction in regards to cocaine no longer holds any meaning because it doesn’t identify something that’s particular. As I said before, in this present society, those who profess to treat others of mental stress ailment are responsible for the very things they claim to oppose.

Shrapnel