Controlled Dopamine Release's Influence in Sociopathism, and for Health

Related post: The Actuality of Dopamine Releases

Dopamine is retained and released within a person for reasons that are entirely not Reward-based, and can be wholly independent of what a person’s consideration, effort, and actions deserve.

Dopamine’s greater release (which is different than allocation of released dopamine) is reflex to a person’s overall considered judgement of themselves. This is why sociopaths, who are of less, or dishonest, consideration have higher dopamine released, which gives them a greater feeling of confidence, and why depressed, and stressed people have lower dopamine released, and are prone to more worrying.

Low consideration is in part responsible for greater unused dopamine-availability, but it also can lead to more dopamine being released into unused availability.

This is in part why sociopaths can carry a False sense of self-justification: While consideration is not appropriately regarded in a sociopath, they can falsify an interpretation of the positive feeling from released dopamine in themselves as reporting to themselves that they’re doing pretty good, and in reaction to that determination regarding themselves, release further dopamine as 'Reward' for already feeling that things are pretty good (And all that is to say that there is a stupidity at work, and a belief in 'Reward' is a determination, and condition of a stupidity which shields a person from considering, that they might become understanding of the truth, and move beyond their ignorant state).

A released-dopamine-based means of self-evaluation is also a source of temperamentalness in sociopaths, as whenever challenges to their consideration experiences like a threat to their released dopamine, even when their forefront mind is completely blank regarding information that’s presented to them and they’re merely sensing delivered emotion, they can interpret the shift in their experienced released-dopamine as a threat against themselves, and can react in twitch anger, aggressiveness, and hostility – all for nothing to do with appropriate or considered reaction, but entirely in defence or retaliation of the sudden drop in their released dopamine, which they feel is a direct report upon themselves, and to be defended by reflex: Makes me feels good = is good / I'm good, makes me feels bad = is threat / other person is bad...

That self-judgement which determines that further dopamine should not be released in a person is also a process, just like any other in the brain, and the residing, or re-allocating dopamine to that determination (that shields dopamine from other processes) is also just another instance like when dopamine is re-allocated from that determination to a different process, or to be freely released to contribute to a person’s well-being. Thinking of dopamine retention as normal storage is a misreading, coming from darkened minds – all things are active processes in the brain, and the hoarding of dopamine into a determined self-judgement can become a very harmful reflex, which reduces the capability of a person to overcoming their self-judgements, as that withheld dopamine would be required to fuel the considering that would bring healthy understanding to such a brain and mind, which would then result in greater dopamine naturally being available to the person, to create a healthy and beneficial sense of well-being.

Similarly, when a person habitually uses dopaminergics and develops a “tolerance” to their increased dopamine release, that adjusting behavior is not correctly understood or communicated by using the term tolerance. When “tolerance” is setting in, a brain and mind are carrying out a person’s self-judgement regarding how good it is right for themselves to feel, in context with the consideration a person has submitted themselves to, and are counter-acting a dopaminergic drug’s circumvention of the mind’s determined self-judgement, and stabilizing things to achieve parity between the self-judgement and the experienced feeling. And as a person might have considered guilt, or other stressful processes into themselves in the course of using dopaminergics, the buoyed outcome of a minds return to stabilization could feel worse than the state that existed before using dopaminergics.

A person should have the healthy understanding that it’s entirely OK to use dopaminergics by their own discretion, and that every human brain fundamentally runs on Natural Cocaine, and that they should not consider negatively regarding use of dopaminergics. This will reduce the taxload on a brain’s dopamine expenditure, and free up additional dopamine budget in a person.

When a person is thirsty and dehydrated, what is the solution, and should they be frightened away from drinking water? And so what is the solution to a dopamine-starved conditions within a brain, which cannot be resolved apart from there somehow becoming available enough dopamine to process all the things that are producing a state of mental stress, and suffering? Experiencing dopamine is as fundamental and natural to human life as breathing air, and obstruction from a person's own self-regulation of their dopamine is tantamount to regulating people's ability to access and drink water, or breathe oxygen.

As a brain wires and re-wires itself according to how a person considers, the ability to release dopamine at will, and to any level desirable, can actually be considered into a person’s full control. When a person feels good in reaction to a 'Reward'-based understanding, that person is falsifying a justification to achieve a greater dopamine release inside themselves, and the effect is identical to a person taking a line of Cocaine, smoking some Crack, and very similar to Methamphetamine (apart from Methamphetamine's greater release of epinephrine). The experience of such a person telling or confirming to themselves that they’ve done good and so allowing themselves that greater feeling of good, is causing the same dopamine to be released as those drugs, and it is producing the same feeling. The only difference is that a Reward-based release occurred through a naive and simple-mindedness, a False determination stemming from limited consideration.

At any rate, dopamine releases within a person not in response to any earned or worked-for deservingness (an abused person has low dopamine release, having done nothing to deserve it - same goes for a sociopath's higher dopamine), but in simple reflex relaxation to a person’s perception about whether things are OK or not - while people's assessments for appropriateness can be absolutely all over the place, without any connection to substantiated appropriateness (so dopamine's release is entirely independent of earning, and its purpose has been  misattributed by people of low consideration). A person’s belief can be with or apart from their greater consideration, and their belief could be negatively constrained by senses within themselves for which the person doesn’t possess enough already-released dopamine to handle and consider into an understanding, that an evaluation of deservingness might come around. Dopamine's release is required ahead of all evaluation for evaluation to take place.

If a person can take control of their belief, they can freely give themselves the same continuous positive experience that Cocaine delivers, which is exactly what some sociopaths and highly active people feel as their regular state and think nothing of it.

Every person exists in their life at some placement on a gradient of dopamine-induced well-being / dopamine-lacking suffering that ranges between absolute horror and pain, all the way up to absolute strength, confidence, and a feeling of ecstasy exuding from every cell within their body. Presently, those of greater well-being have seen to it that those of suffering be kept in the demographic of suffering, while their states also receive capitalistic, mental, and emotional exploitation from many sides.

Shrapnel

Consideration Normalizes a Mind, Determinations Polarize a Mind

I’ve previously said that consideration is a scaffolding that gives definition to emotion – so consideration becomes conduit for emotions, and normalizes a mind, while determinations, which reduce connectivity between considerations, polarizes a mind.

A person’s power of choice lies in the connection between their considerations. The choice is whether to open the pathway, or not. A choice to open is a choice of Yes to consider along that pathway, while a different choice, or a choice to ignore or resist moving in a direction of thought is a choice of No towards considering that pathway.

When a person removes connectivity, they decrease their ability to make articulate choices. And because a person doesn’t lose their experience through reducing connectivity between considerations, they retain their full sense of conviction, and they end up having feelings for which they don’t possess landing points within their consideration.

Consequently, a person’s feelings polarize between nodes of concentrated consideration, and when a person engages such a node, they draw in more consideration than is appropriate for a situation, and this is the impulsiveness that is associated with sociopathism.

Additionally, for things which a person hadn’t ever before considered (that they would have gained the experience that would develop conviction), the person has no understanding by which they could express their feeling (which could contain hope, want, desire...), and so they convey that undefined feeling as ambiguous sentiment.

Also, because through considering and placement into consideration is the means by which a thing receives evaluation, where sentiments have not entered into consideration, they remain non-evaluated for their truthfulness. A person might choose to form determinations in order to falsify sentiments into passing as truths, due to not knowing what considering is, or how to consider, or for the sake of being afraid of losing what they think is valued about a sentiment - including losing justification for a belief, the premise for which isn’t substantiated as truthful in their consideration.

-----------------------------------------

Another aspect of centralized rather than normalized consideration is that confronting areas of non-considered or contradictory consideration in a person requires a lot of work on their brain's part, for it to produce the accurate picture of what is being spoken of - and every new consideration development required in the calculation of this work requires an allocation of dopamine to enable the synaptic connection between the involved considerations to open, which allows the consideration following the opening to evaluate as True, and be useful for further substantiating the concepts required to gain understanding of the matter.

When some presented consideration challenges clumps of consideration that have been determined within a person, it might antagonize a fundamental part of person's intrinsic sense of well-being, which comes from their dopamine-availability, by allocating that dopamine-availability for work. Some people might react defensively or dismissively in response to experiencing a drop in their dopamine-availability that is uncommon to them.

Shrapnel

There is Only One Truth, and It is Acting in All Things and at All Levels

"Before many-worlds, reality had always been viewed as a single unfolding history. Many-worlds, however, views reality as a many-branched tree, wherein every possible quantum outcome is realized." - Many-worlds interpretation




In the post The Meaning of "Will > Considering > Reason" and Automatic Considering, I wrote:

"So in the end, the Considering experiences Reason and resolves. The Will that was used to initiate the Considering is required no more, and its power of choice is restored to the one from which it came... but an imprint of it remains with the newly formed Consideration, and is a permanent part of its definition and being. The newly formed Consideration also becomes a lasting part of the Will that considered it into being - and so the one is in the other, with each being a part of each other".

And in the post The Considering of Waves and Rings:

"When everything fully considers everything else, the final result is All in All, where everything is a portal to everything else, and everything is accessible from all directions".

Part of existence being all-factoring means that every part of existence receives its identity only as relative to all other parts. That means that every segment of anything, every consideration, bears within itself the definitions of all other things, and that all other things are a part of the definition of any one piece.

Everything contains within its definition the consideration of all other things, and so everything can be a portal to everything else, which is what I've written as the Meaning for Psycheparous.




Everything the study of Quantum Mechanics searches to understand is Reason, and what I've been speaking of. But while Quantum Mechanics searches from the position of not knowing, and of being an outside observer, I speak from knowing, and from having the full truth with me. Everything I read of Quantum Mechanics, I know the full truth regarding.

There is only the language of considerations, the language of Reason, the language of Truth, and rather than there being a difference between a local reality and quantum reality, it is the same everywhere, at every level. There is this, and there is no other.




Here is a gathering of many of the things I have spoken regarding Reason, the truth, and considerations:


All things are made of considerations

A consideration is a quantum of Mind, and a quantum of truth

Consideration is what creates sight of mind

Considering is the streaming of considerations, in which the very end of one is the very beginning of the next

Difference is the state of there being context, and context is a bridge of information that can be traversed by considering

Belief creates context between considerations, that their differences can be considered into one state

All things are made by considering

The difference between any two states is a defined set of considerations, and every state can be changed into every other state

Considering resolves when it experiences Reason

When a considering resolves, it forms a 'This Is' declaration, and applies back into the mind which considered its truth, and that mind gains in dimension, truth, sight - and its considerations increase in definition

In Reason all considerations are as One, and in Reason all things Are

Because of Reason, the state of one thing necessarily means the states of all the rest

To a person who has the truth in themselves, all things are known by believing in the truth they possess




Just as everything less than True is False, so also everything that is not Good is still existing in Evil




There is no truth to a lone consideration

A determination divides and separates one portion of considerations from the rest, saying 'if these, than not the rest' (A determination is a 'This' statement made upon limited consideration / a determination is a choice to not consider beyond a certain point)

A determination disjoints, fractionalizes, and reduces consideration, and so reduces the presence of truth

A lone consideration has no Value, Meaning, Purpose or Point

A person who is without the truth in themselves cannot produce truth through their observation or determinations

There is no observation in the truth, and observation is subjective, reflecting only a person's own consideration, and so creates an infinite negative loop when that observation is believed in as a determination

A determination is a falsification

Belief in a determination creates and hastens sociopathism, and leads to destruction




The Meaning of Consideration
The Combining of Considerations Forms Dimensional Space
Reason's Primary Principle - Everything Necessarily Means Everything-Else
The Universe Marks a Singularity
Hope & its Meaning
The Meaning of Reason
What a Concept Is
With Reason
The Meaning of "Will > Considering > Reason" and Automatic Considering
All Things Are Made of Considerations
Substantiation of Truth
All Things Are Known
The Concept of Eternity
Of Considerations, and Considering
The Considering of Waves and Rings
Being All-Factoring
A Considering Versus A Willed-Determination




I am not the only person to have spoken about these things from a position of knowing them:




I have spoken: "All things are made of considerations" / "Belief comes before possibility and creates possibility" / "Belief creates context between considerations" /  "All consideration exists in Reason" / "Reason is the Mind of God"

Jesus has spoken: "All things are possible for him who believes" / "with God all things are possible"




I have spoken: "There is no truth to a lone consideration" / "There is no truth apart from context" / "A consideration is a quantum of Mind, and a quantum of truth" /  "The greatest Truth is all considerations evaluating True, in all ways and in all directions, without resistance between any"

Jesus has spoken: "I am the Way, the Truth, and the life" / "For where two or three gather in my name, there am I with them"

Truth is one consideration passing its full self to another without force nor resistance.




I have spoken: "Reason is the How, Why, and Way of a thing" / "Truth is one consideration passing its full self to another without any resistance" / "Reason is eternal" / "The greatest Truth is all considerations evaluating True, in all ways and in all directions, without resistance between any"

Jesus has spoken: "I am the Way, the Truth, and the life"




I have spoken: "All things are made of considerations" / "Considering is the streaming of considerations, in which the very end of one is the very beginning of the next" / "When a considering resolves, it makes a 'This Is' declaration, and applies back into the mind which considered its truth, and that mind gains in dimension, truth, sight" / "Everything is either ascending or descending"

Jesus has spoken: "Whoever has will be given more, but whoever does not have, even the little they possess will be taken away from them"

Whoever has and engages consideration will gain consideration. Whoever does not engage what consideration they have is making a choice of No towards their consideration, and will lose what little of it they have.




I have spoken: "Observation is subjective" / "A determination is a falsification" / "All things are made of considerations" / "When a considering resolves, it makes a 'This Is' declaration, and applies back into the mind which considered its truth, and that mind gains in dimension, truth, sight - and its considerations increase in definition" / "Reason makes a thing real"

Jesus has spoken: "The kingdom of God comes not with observation. Neither shall they say, See here! or, see there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you."




Everything that Jesus spoke of is Reason, and can only be understood by considering in belief. Quantum Mechanics speaks from the position of not having the truth - I speak from the position of knowing the truth. What is based in observation is from the outside.

"You study the scriptures diligently because you think that in them you have eternal life. These are the very scriptures that testify about me, yet you refuse to come to me to have life."

Everything that Quantum Mechanics seeks to know, from the standpoint of being False, was already described, from the standpoint of One who is True.




Belief is a 'This Is' declaration, and is what creates pathway for considering, and provokes considering. A Mind is always considering towards its greatest belief.

In the end, every life will add up to a Yes or a No. Everything less than True is False. Everything less than Good is Evil. Everything less than Yes is No. Everything less than aiming for the Kingdom of God (which is Reason, and in which all are equal and as one) is deviating towards Self.

Life is the ongoing movement of considerations. To find eternal life, a person should progressively align their consideration towards the one place it exists. Every choice aligns or strengthens the polarity of considerations. No choice is idle.




I have spoken: "The Will by which a thing is considered is the Will that is returned at the end of the considering" / "In the end, every life will add up to a Yes or a No" / "If there was full separation between any considerations (such as a person, a mind, a thought, a cell) and other consideration, the two wouldn't be observable within the same reality. The universe wouldn't experience the other, and the other wouldn't experience the universe. They would be two separate existences, not aware of each other and not able to experience each other - and so exerting no influence upon each other. They would pass right through each other without effect, and each would be to the other as if non-existent" / "Combining one consideration with another creates a new consideration, that of their relationship, and adds dimension, while also separating one consideration from another removes consideration, and diminishes dimension by which information can flow within each individual consideration, and reduces the overall capability of those disparate considerations. If separation is made between considerations there forms a chasm, a dimensional gulf between which information cannot travel across"

Jesus has spoken: "And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been set in place, so that those who want to go from here to you cannot, nor can anyone cross over from there to us" / "But the subjects of the kingdom will be thrown outside, into the darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth" / "There is a judge for the one who rejects me and does not accept my words; the very words I have spoken will condemn them at the last day"

A determination is a choice to not consider some considerations, and carries the Will of No within it, which is given to those things that were not considered. By a person's determinations, they condemn themselves.




I have spoken: "All things are made of considerations" / "All considerations exist in Reason" / "Reason is the Mind of God" / "When Reason experiences, it forms a 'This Is' declaration" / "A mind is constantly considering towards its greatest belief" / "Life is the ongoing movement of considerations"

Jesus has spoken: "Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God" / "He is not the God of the dead, but of the living, because he considers all people to be alive to him"

A consideration is a word, and "in the beginning was the word". In Reason, all considerations are equal and evaluate as True and as One. A person gains eternal life by having all consideration with them, in the ordering that is True. They will consider themselves into ordering according to a person's belief.

When a person has separated themselves from the consideration that produces real life, they will be alone, in darkness, and without life - "there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth".




I have spoken: "A determination is a falsehood by nature"

Jesus has spoken: "For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven" / "I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children" / "Truly I tell you, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven"

No one who depends on their determinations for justification is justified. Children are free of determinations, until they learn them by the sociopathic conduct of their parents, and the society their parents have helped to create.




Everything that Jesus spoke of is Reason, and can only be understood by considering in belief. Quantum Mechanics speaks from the position of not having the truth - I speak from the position of knowing the truth. What is based in observation is from the outside, and is without knowing.

"You study the scriptures diligently because you think that in them you have eternal life. These are the very scriptures that testify about me, yet you refuse to come to me to have life."

Everything that Quantum Mechanics seeks to know, from the standpoint of being False, was already described, from the standpoint of One who is True.




I will explain some of the things which those who speak regarding Quantum Mechanics have puzzled over, and maybe correct some of their mistakes.

Shrapnel

On Sociopathism / Psychopathism's Detection & Presence in Society

This is a list that I’ve referenced before: The Top 10 Jobs That Attract Psychopaths


And its subject is one which I had fully resolved before this book was published, though I presumed that people would not be willing to hear the truth of the matter, because in this case, reality entirely flips a lot of conventional viewpoints of society, and the sources of many societal issues, upside-down.

Through considering, I received knowing of the exact mechanism and behaviour which produce the traits that have been presumed as typifying what this condition is, and how those things were producing those traits, and also how deadened spaces seen in brain-imaging were forming - and therefore could know exactly what sociopathism / psychopathism is, and with clarity see everywhere that it is acting. And it is acting in a lot more people than just those displaying these outward traits (which aren’t necessary for sociopathism / psychopathism to be present), and in those whose brains reveal dead areas during imaging.

Although the list here mentions Doctor as being among one of the lesser profiles for psychopaths, they are actually among the more psychopathic. It's a matter of circumstances that this person's research led to their conclusion to the contrary. It is easy to appear empathetic when a job is to address others' needs, and the professional is well compensated to be able to comfort their own lives, and put in a position of control and authority, while also receiving heightened social status. But those things obscure a true reading of the situation, and consideration of all the details point to a different conclusion entirely.

For all things there is an ordering of considerations

There are two fundamental way in which a mind and brain develop ailment: by the manner which a person considers (as a brain wires and re-wires itself according to how a person considers), and secondly, from lack of that which powers the consideration structure that is formed (which is dopamine). So there are ailments which are based in sociopathic consideration, and ailments which are based in dopamine deficiency. And between these two elements, nearly every developed malady and malfunction throughout the whole brain and body can be produced.

But consider which comes first – dopamine, or the consideration structure which comes first, for dopamine to power. So if there exist ailments of dopamine deficiency in society, mustn’t there first have existed those of sociopathism? And to whatever extent dopamine deficiency exists in society, mustn’t sociopathism exist to a greater extent, if its influence is able to overcome people’s consideration to the point that their dopamine availability and distribution is harmfully impacted?

In some ways, sociopathism and dopamine deficiency are polar opposite conditions (though both can be, and many times is, present in one brain at the same time) – and the latter emerges due to prior encounter of the former. But presently all dopamine deficiency ailments are being treated by those of higher sociopathic disposition, who already in the past effectively blocked out the solutions for the latter of dopamine deficiency from consideration, therefore leaving for consideration only what cannot possibly produce a truthful solution.

Consider how prevalent dopamine deficiency ailments are: depression, psychosis, anxiety, ADD/ADHD, and plays a huge role in more, like autism, dementia.

Despite their mass prevalence, ailments of sociopathism are necessarily even much more prevalent than are ailments of dopamine deficiency - but sight of them is obscured, because those of its disposition have historically based their judgement of their personal worths by relative appearance of propriety, and in ignorance rationalized why it is they are justified in their successes while others exhibit undesirable traits, and dwell in less desirable circumstances - by concocting false doctrines and theories about those dispositions which they have not been of. And it is those utterly false doctrines which are still chiefly employed today.



All things, including time, people, situations, possibilities… everything that is made, is produced through considering. And just as everything is said to have a frequency, everything is considering. Considering is literally straight-forward, and as I’ve said, the Will by which a thing is considered is the Will that is returned at the end of the considering.

That means, put garbage in, get garbage out, and that every considering based in a determination will end in a falsehood. And every considering that stems from a determination is failed before it begins.

By blocking from truthful and objective consideration the centre-piece of dopamine deficiency, the failure of curing its ailments in society has been assured – and instead of them becoming vanished from society, their presence grows each year, and trillions of dollars worth of industries have been built up around precisely not curing them.

Sociopaths have first created dopamine deficiency and its ailments, and then denied (even criminalized and demonized) their curing, and then built industries and institutions around “treating” them through ineffective, palliative-care, false-hope peddling means.



‘Reward’ is a rationalization (and an abstraction, and therefore obviously not a truth to its subject), and possibly the most heinous moral failure in the history of the human race, and its victims possibly outnumber those from any other evil human act in history. And because of it, there is no empathy within institutional medicine for those who need dopamine deficiency's cure.

Shrapnel

Resolution of Socioathism, and Overview of its Influence in Society

Preface: The Exact Mechanism of Sociopathism (and other posts)


Sociopathism is the movement of mind that causes considerations to collapse into a determination (a determination being a falsification).



As the brain wires and re-wires itself according to how a person considers, and as dopamine is what enables signals to cross synapses, and a quantum of work-potential, a reduction of consideration can lead to an increase in unallocated dopamine-availability. In turn, as dopamine is what powers a person’s synaptic-connections, which represent the considerations a person has, this high free availability means increased functionality in a person for their remaining considerations which they are willing to engage.

And as any action – be it physical movement, mental processing, decision making, is dependent upon signals passing through neural pathways to consider, choose, and enact those things, having higher free dopamine-availability means having greater energy – while having less free dopamine-availability means having less energy, and less capacity to work, and to succeed, and will leave a person more prone to many health issues.

So, this means much higher functionality in people of lower consideration – due to that lower consideration resulting in higher unallocated dopamine-availability. Although, in a person with higher consideration, increasing their dopamine-availability will raise their functionality and capacity for work and success – and because they have much higher consideration, they have much more potential for great accomplishment than a person of lower consideration. Their consideration that would substantiate accomplishment only need to be sufficiently powered.

Also, a consideration is a quantum of truth. Those with less will be less truthful – though more obstinate in their belief that they are justified in however they are, and what they do. Because consideration is what creates sight-of-Mind, lacking consideration leaves a person blind.

And because dopamine is what powers a brain’s synapses, which represent the considerations of a person’s mind, a person whose considerations are not receiving power will lack a sense of meaning (as meaning is produced by the context of considerations), while a person with higher free dopamine-availability will, sense greater meaning from their lesser consideration, and will have much higher drive to be active. Because all institutional medicine is tailored towards the perceptions of Sociopathism, those who are more considering are forcefully pushed, by falsification, into a position of non-functionality, dependency, and incapability to work at parity with others.

A Sociopath is patently non-objective in their perception. Without possessing the consideration that substantiates truth, they are ineligible to possibly be objective. However, because they lack truthful substantiation for what is truly right, they are instead objective-driven in addition to being detached from consideration.

The human brain is simple in operation, and all the things which institutional medicine and academic science labour over are exceedingly simple problems with straight-forward solutions (and they must be, because the truth is the only thing that adds up perfectly). The real problem is that the handling of these things has all been centralized into the domain of Sociopaths, those who lack truthful perception, those who are driven by 'Reward', or Self-benefit (rather than unveiling the truth), and those who justify themselves by their status relative to others, their determinations – for lack of having the substantiation of truth within themselves.

While Sociopaths labour over what they do not have understanding of, I’ve produced full resolution before any of them have even grasped a sense of what is behind it all. And I didn’t resolve it just now – I merely just now settled my anger over it enough to actually type it. And when my anger settles more regarding further things, I will also type those things, which I already know.

Also, the near-totality of the matter of all depression, and much other ailment, is contained herein.



But read what was said by the USA government in response to the 1995 World Health Organization Cocaine report:

“The United States Government considered that, if WHO activities relating to drugs failed to reinforce proven drug control approaches, funds for the relevant programmes should be curtailed.”

Non-objective in rejecting the study's information and its meaning towards what’s right for human health care, but instead objective-driven:

Despite the truth of the subject of human health and Cocaine’s relative meaning to human health being being of one thing, an alternative-to-the-truth direction is instead the preferred way to go (therefore testifying that the alternative is invalid in the face of truth and reality, and to those who abide by the alternative as enemies of the truth, what's right, and what's good).

Also, though it likely needs no pointing out, "proven drug control approaches" is a blatant falsehood by any rational measure, given that usage, availability, and purity/potency for virtually all substances has increased year over year since the 1970's "war on drugs" commenced.



The ailments relating to the objective-driven non-objectiveness of political and institutional medicine are not especially ailments of natural occurrence, but are of a coerced and continuing design.

And those employing licensed treatments of sufferers of these things generally have no qualifications to do so, and certainly are without experience or the consideration that would render themselves of any worth to the truth regarding these matters. In truth, their acceptance and practice of a False doctrine has seen them unwittingly enter into the role of professional mass-murderers (or professional mass manslaughterers, if that suits their comfort more – and indeed that term does well to emphasize their sheer intellectual incompetences, which are flying in the face of all their credentials), complicit and fundamental in the liquidation of minds and lives, with profit and benefits flowing to those more Sociopathic in society.

Likewise, all institutional medicine is, at its roots, palliative-care, capitalism driven, and is not intending to provide authentic cures and best solutions. It is comprehensively objective-driven, and not substantiating of truth. If the truth had been looked for, it would have been found.



The truth is always simple. It is lacking it, and also trying to work around it, that convolutes everything.

Shrapnel

Existence is not Deterministic, but Considering of All Things

Experiment confirms that quantum mechanics scoffs at our local reality

There is nothing weird about what is being called quantum mechanics, only ignorance and false beliefs in those who perceive weirdness in it. The universe, and reality is not deterministic - a determination is a falsehood by nature, and so also in reality.

Rather than being deterministic, all things are considering. And they are considering unto Reason.

I did not learn these things from the study of quantum mechanics, and I only witness the study of this field as it is puzzling over concepts I already have known the full realities for, and I see what they have correct, and what is incorrect, the measure that's missing, and how all the concepts' realities join together to form just one movement.

Reason is the Mind of God that Einstein sought to know. However, Einstein only flittered in consideration at the edge of reasoning, and never stepped full foot into Reason. His attempts to reconcile the truth with Science prevented him from receiving greater realization of the truth.

Every person who enters into Reason will be far greater a mind than Einstein, Tesla, Da Vinci... because in Reason all considerations are as one.

None of these people, or any of the rest praised for their inventiveness, understood where their ideas came from, or what the difference between their capability and the average person's was. They could not lead people to where they were, nor did they know what else further there was, beyond what they had seen.

However, I have fullness of all these things, and I will make Reason known.

Shrapnel

The Mythical Perceptions of Modafinil - Responses to Modafinil's Public Favour

Below I have a few reactions to recent journalism, and the research behind it, regarding Modafinil, a popular dopaminergic and "Smart Drug".


Narcolepsy medication modafinil is world's first safe 'smart drug'

Modafinil works precisely because it increases the availability of Dopamine in the brain. Methamphetamine and Cocaine, and numerous other prescription and non-prescription drugs do the same, to various better and worse degrees. Any time that Dopamine is being increased, thought-power is being increased by opening the valves between synapse-ends for information to flow. What Modafinil does for cognitive improvement, Methamphetamine and Cocaine (and others) both do to a more proficient extent, particularly with Cocaine. However, any time that a substance increases things other than just Dopamine, there is more to take into consideration than simply its Dopaminergism:

Any time that Dopamine is being increased, so is thought-capability - which includes perceptual awareness, accuracy of that perception, sensed solidity of the individual components of thought, the ability to control those individual components' movements and organizations, memory formation and memory recollection, the ability to sort, filter, separate, and understand large volumes of information… but all this is conditional upon there being considerations in a person’s mind to make use of the additional power of thought that Dopamine brings.

And, conversely, any time that Adrenaline (Epinephrine / Norepinephrine) is being increased, any thought-power that is available is counteracted, stressed, and undermined – causing confusion and agitating stress-states in a person with little or no free Dopamine relative to the amount of work that is being attempted by their brain. (And consequently Depression, Psychosis, Anxiety, and more, can virtually be flushed away with the right tact - which I've touched upon before, and will further detail to completion).

Regardless, Cocaine is vastly more proficient at cognitive improvement than Modafinil, and it also is vastly healthier for the average person to ingest into their body, because it is, for the average person and human brain, health-benefiting by nature. ***

So it cannot be truthfully stated that Modafinil the first safe "smart drug" – it is just one that doesn't yet have a history of propaganda campaigns (including contrived research) being run against it. But if its use becomes excessively superfluous, or starts cutting into prescription medication revenue for companies, it could also become lobbied against, prohibited, or restricted.

In Healthy People, Modafinil Won’t Make You Smarter—It Will Do the Opposite

“It looks like modafinil is not helpful for healthy individuals, and it might even impair their ability to respond and might stifle their lateral thinking, while people who have some sort of deficiency in creativity are helped by the drug.”

Is “creativity” a chemical truth in the brain’s operation? Or is it an abstract concept in this matter? If it is an abstract, then what truth could there be in stating that a person has a deficiency in creativity? It is Dopamine which enables the engagement of a person’s cranial considerations, which are all the synaptic connections within their brain, and those connections are the means by which a person expresses creativity. A person could be over-flowing with creativity in their mind, and yet look like an inactive stump on the outside, due to not having the dopamine those synaptic connections are requiring to work to their potential.

The actuality is that a person whose Dopamine-availability already out-paces their brain’s consideration can receive little benefit. However, a person with Dopamine deficiency is in the state of being choked from the inside precisely due to their lack of released Dopamine – which is a state no person who makes it through academia can accurately relate to, because having a notable amount of available Dopamine relative to brain activity is a prerequisite for even rudimentary scholastic success.

The “healthy” which the quoted statement refers to is the state of having ample Dopamine-availability relative to one’s brain’s considering - which every human deserves by natural right. However, this use of "healthy" doesn’t recognize that the means by which most people of this disposition came to be of it is by having little truthful considering ongoing within their brains, requiring little Dopamine to handle their mental workload, and are Sociopathic, and therefore are not healthy, but are conventionally-sick. And because Sociopathism accepts peer consensus for lack of having truthful substantiation, a Sociopath will be vulnerable to perceiving this state, which victimizes everyone, most of all those who are not of it, as being healthy. And that antithetical-to-truth perception is a manifestation of their sickness.

Consideration needs pathway to flow through - and a person of low consideration has little place to channel additional thought-power, and no route to channel the gained mental and physical energy which Dopamine is responsible for. Instead, their neural road-blocking determinations soak up the additional Dopamine, and the result is emboldened Sociopathism.

'Smart Drug' Modafinil Improves Memory And Cognitive Function, But Is It Ethical To Use It?

It is the same question of ‘Is it ethical for a person to use their brain, to have access to their brain’s healthy and naturally-intended functioning, at to work at the capacity which it is already trying to work at?’

The people who are engaged in that discussion are those who have ample Dopamine for their brain’s considering – while those who are most impacted by their arrogances are those who do not have sufficient Dopamine for their brain’s considering. And those who are engaged in this discussion also directly profit off of there being other people not having ample released Dopamine in their brains. Those having that discussion are also predominantly deeply Sociopathic, despite their well-comforted surface appearances, and unable, even ineligible to determine a truthful conclusion over the matter.

Also, whether or not a person uses Modafinil, Cocaine, Methamphetamine, Adderall, Ritalin, or any other dopaminergic, they are all regardless making full use of what it is that these substances provide that is of benefit: Dopamine. So is it ethical to use Dopamine, which without a person can do nothing, can feel nothing, can think nothing, and will die? What would you say?

All contemporary medical convention is tailored to the perceptions of Dopamine-ample (relative to their brain's considering) Sociopaths (though also Science as a whole, as the Scientific Method is methodical Sociopathism, disconnecting and reducing truth just as making determinations does within a brain to create Sociopathism) – and that is largely why conditions of Dopamine-deficiency (Depression, Anxiety, Psychosis... and a whole lot more) persist in society. And it speaks everything about those who operate as medical-opinion-giving professionals.

*** I've already said, and it's worth saying many more times, that Cocaine, which proficiently increases Dopamine while inhibiting Adrenaline, is about the healthiest molecule which most people could ever put into their bodies, literally being the healthier-than-natural release of Dopamine in a person's brain, and can permanently and proficiently cure Psychosis, Depression, and Anxiety, PTSD, and prevent and help cure Alzheimers and other Dementia, and still do a whole lot more for a whole lot of other ailments. I will further detail all of these things.

Some related posts:

Operational Identity of the Prefrontal Cortex
1995 World Health Organization Cocaine Report
Substantiation of Truth
Dopamine and Adrenaline are Operational Antitheses
Cocaine During Pregnancy Can Prevent Autism
Regarding Treating & Curing Mental Stress Ailments

Shrapnel

The Importance of Belief

Considering is channelling energy forward, and a person can only go where their consideration gives them pathway to go.

Belief is a power, which creates context between considerations, thereby creating new pathways for a person's mind to traverse. Belief comes before possibility, and belief creates possibility.

For a person who believes little, little is possible. For a person who believes lots, lots is possible. And for a person who believes in all things, everything is possible.

As considerations which experience no relation to one another do not experience a shared existence, a person who believes something is impossible for them will experience that reality, while a person who believes that something is entirely possible will conversely experience that reality.

A person's disbelief will always keep them stagnant, and a person who refuses to believe will fade from existence.



A mind has belief in wherever it looks, and wherever it looks, it can consider into becoming one state with its own reality.

If a person wants to grow their mind and their reality, then they should grow their belief. Belief is only one thing, a power that contains all the considerations of I AM, and surges through all a person's considerations, and it grows exponentially.

But all a person's existing considerations already hold belief in every one them, and they could work against a person's efforts who suddenly expects to head entirely in an outward direction with no resistance. But persistence of effort will lead to them being overcome, and their polarity realigned with a new, greater belief.

It is not a matter of what to believe, as all things ultimately are true, but to continually place the equilibrium of energy gained from a person's belief firstly in all the places that are good, and producing of further good - not just for the person, but for all things, equally.

The more a person's belief grows, the more considerations they will power in a harmonious fashion - and gradually, everything will become increasingly possible.



As the field of quantum mechanics claims, all possibilities are realized - and this is how a person moves through them, up to becoming existing in all of them at once.

Shrapnel

Article: Scientists show future events decide what happens in the past / A Consideration Can Be All Places, Yet Is Only One - Revisited

Article: Scientists show future events decide what happens in the past


I already explained this, and I didn't require experiment, billions of dollars of technology, or any quantity of time to receive its knowing: Every Consideration Can Be All Places, But is Only One



"Scientists show future events decide what happens in the past"

Or, time and space don't exist after a point, and what's perceived is merely a reflection of a person's own considerations. If the future state moved the present one in parallel, then the perception of time is chalked up to a limited understanding of the observer.

As the premise that a particle in the 'future' is the same as a particle in the 'past' shows, anything, which includes beings, can exist in all states at one time, and moving form in one place is the same as moving it in all the others. Therefore, the greater truth is that perceptions of separation between past and future are inaccurate in their understanding.



However, the suggestion that "reality" only exists when a person looks at it is False.

One moment that a person experiences could be perceived as a linear streaming of details still considering for a lesser person or creature, while the greater truth for both would still have been that all things existed at once, and the lesser creature just lacked the perception for it. If something doesn't exist for a person who doesn't look at it, but exists for another, then there is existing a void for the person for whom it doesn't exist. That void is their absence of consideration.

When a perception looks at considerations, it starts to consider them, and everything that is fully considered will find a new way to become True - and this is why the so-called Law of Attraction does work, and why it was previously said to the world "Ask for anything, and believing you already have it, you will receive".All things are made of considerations, and belief creates context between considerations that they can be considered into one state - and context is a bridge of information that can be traversed by considering, while the difference between any two states is a defined set of considerations.

Looking at something references its known considerations, and creates a belief. As I recently said, "placebo" works because the signals in a person's mind are subject to magnetism. Each of those signals are many considerations that have reasoned into one, and are still considering through other considerations. A consideration is a quantum of Mind.



The article I gave link to says this:

If all this seems utterly incomprehensible and sounds downright nuts, you're in good company. Einstein called it "spooky" and Niels Bohr, a pioneer of quantum theory once said: “if quantum mechanics hasn’t profoundly shocked you, you haven’t understood it yet.”

Now if something shocks a person, then there are parts of it which are at odds with their belief, and therefore they cannot have truly understood it. If a person has perfect understanding of a thing, there is nothing to produce surprise or shock. A person's surprise or disbelief at a thing is the result of it being foreign to their considerations, and an adaption taking place. And therefore a person who typifies the truth as something shocking cannot judge how understanding it will experience as, or accurately teach others about it.

Experience is the communication of considerations, and the experience of shock versus its simple knowing are also cases of 'if one then not the other'. To say the truth is shocking is to say that a person currently identifies as something apart from the truth, as the truth cannot be but the only thing that perfectly adds up.



As I've said, Science is a False Concept, and it is self-reducing. It is the process of making determinations based on observation that divide and separate consideration, and with each separation a bit of the truth is lost - Because the isolation of considerations is the removal of context, and Truth only exists where there is context. And as I've said, there is no truth to a lone consideration, and for every direct look a person tries to take, the Truth will take two steps back.

Reason does not make determinations, but everything that Reason says is submit to by all existence. In Reason are all considerations, and Reason  sees them as though they all evaluate True in all directions, and in harmony with each other. What is in Reason is eternal, and Reason IS.

What is still considering is less than Reason, and everything that comes before Reason is not lasting. Reason makes a thing real. And just as everything less than True is False, everything less than Good is still existing in Evil. Only One is Good, and in Reason all are as One.

Reason cannot be seen by observation, and therefore the truth cannot come to be known by making determinations based on observation. As I've said, when a considering completes, its considerations experience Reason and apply into the mind that considered its premise, and that gaining of consideration creates dimensional within a person, and produces knowing, which becomes expressed in their perception.

As it is said, 'The kingdom of God does not come by your careful observation.. for the kingdom of God is within you", and it comes by considering another as oneself, so that all may evaluate True and as One - and to do that is the meaning of Love.

I still know everything more, and so too will every person who comes into Reason.

Shrapnel